TALES FROM THE MELBOURNE WRITERS FESTIVAL

1. Guests pile into the Melbourne Town Hall on the opening night. Joss Wheadon, the man behind the cult television series Buffy, gave a late night keynote address. 2. DBC Pierre reads his work as part of Dog’s Tails, a story telling night held at a dark Melbourne bar. Pierre’s new book, Lights out in Wonderland, was launched during the festival.


More Photos Here.

If DBC Pierre wasn’t twelve scotches into a bender before he went on stage, I have lost a substantial wager. The guy won a Booker prize, I get it, he’s a locomotive of ability. I also get the whole Hunter S. Thompson drunk-while-being-funny-on-stage-thing. The lighting was low, adding to the vibe, and having the story telling event held at the Toft in Town, one of Melbourne’s most exhausting bars to find, also added to the drama. But I did like his voice, which at times thought would be better suited to one of those fragrance adds, where Orlando bloom rolls around in the sand trying to nail Miley Cyrus. A great voice – really exceptional. But the story he told about lizards drinking at bars, losing their limbs like lizards obviously would, was achingly confusing, and ten minutes later, I was still unsure what to think. When he finished, I guess I finally got it, as much as one could get DBC Pierre’s insanity. I had a suspicion I could see what all the fuss was about, though, from listening to the oooh’s and ahhhh’s as Pierre made cracks about being half drunk. He’s a lunatic, clearly. A wonderful, adorable, admirable lunatic, but totally off the reservation. The festival committee was wise to bring him out, Melbourne loves that shit. To some degree the crowd fitted to his style perfectly. Melbourne is the hipster capital of Australia, and the audience was made up of equal quantities of irony and fixed gear bicycles, I’m guessing, his people. After DBC swam off stage in a drunken whoosh, the audience clapped the precise number of times they heard his name mentioned during the festival, (seventeen thousand). In a way he was lucky. If the event was held during the day, he’d have been crucified by the crazy English literature teachers who swarmed the festival, demanding to know everyone’s process, while refusing to hand back the microphone once their question was asked.

After his reading I went to the bar to get a drink (I needed one). My editor, Chris Flynn, was introducing another guest on stage. It was there I met Beowulf Sheehan (yes, that’s his real name), who was leaning heavily over a bunker sized camera. Jenny Niven, the program manager for the festival, invited him to Melbourne from his post in New York to photograph the authors throughout the event – portraits only. He looked like an older version of Cheddar Bob from 8 mile.

“I’ve got a hit list,” he said. “Gotta shoot seventy guests, names are all here.” He slid the piece of paper in my direction.
“I think I’ve seen your photos,” I said. “You shot Brett Easton Ellis, right?”
“Nah,” he said. “That would have been great though. I would have loved to.”

Ellis, who now resembles a more jovial Drew Carey, had come to the Melbourne Writers Festival a week before it started, (go figure that one out.) His sessions were qwerky and scattered, where he often talked about everything except the questions that were asked of him. Personally, I think it was a shame the festival couldn’t get both DBC Pierre and Ellis to chair a session together, on, say, healthcare reform, if nothing more than to promote the use of grade A narcotics as a shoehorn into the literature business. Ellis tickets sold out fast, and fans came from all over town to hear the guy talk about his new book, Imperial Bedrooms, the sequel to his first book, Less Than Zero.

The city of Melbourne almost exclusively runs on coffee, that and black leather jackets, and before anyone had a chance to get their morning motivation, an intimate session was held called The Morning Fix, a carryover event from last year, based on its overwhelming success. It’s an opportunity for authors of all types, except perhaps for the ones with difficult publicists, to chat about writing and read from their new books, which they would, as the host said, be signing at the back of the room. One notable Fix session was the first, and a seemingly odd one to mention at all. The event showcased Benjamin Law, a writer I thought I’d dislike, based on what I speculated his book would be like, a non-fictional account about his family growing up in Brisbane. My wife was reading his book at the time, and I was convinced, based on his tweets, that he had written a self indulgent book about his family, with the hopes of gaining celebrity at their expense. In the end, I couldn’t have been more wrong.

Law is much humbler in person than he is on the internet, and one could be forgiven for confusing the two personalities for totally different people. His debut book, Family Law, is a haunting surprise. The stories of his family are beautifully comical and intimate, and the lunacy of the book is relatable to someone who imagines their own parents to be hysterical. The story he read for the session was about killing cockroaches and was a fine example. Why he didn’t choose to immortalise the characters into fiction though, is a question I wondered about. It’s certainly a more common theme with writers, passing their autobiographies off as fiction. I think he made the right choice, ultimately, and was honest about it, which I found absolutely commendable. The kudus he’s receiving for the book is undoubtedly well deserved. In what can only be described as show and tell, Law dragged his mother around the festival, a woman who’s now a celebrity in her own right, even making an appearance on morning television. During the Text Publishing party held on opening night, Law’s mother grabbed my arm firmly, telling me the values of raising children with a stay at home parent, and that I must promise her I would not subject my children to the apathy of childcare. After chatting to her for a while, I could see the necessity of book. He would have been mad not to write it.

The morning fix session also introduced me to a shaky spoken Singaporean writer, Kim Cheng Boey, who seemed to hold more stories in what he didn’t say than what he did. He spoke of Singapore and how it’s changed, but carefully, as if he was waiting for someone to twist his arm so he could finally unload a secret. He spoke of childhood, family, and becoming a man. He often talked in riddles and metaphor, quoting Proust and philosophers, but in an earnest, unpretentious way, making me think he was just geared differently, a little like a Godard film.

Somewhere during the festival, I found myself alongside Andy Murdoch, a journalist from MX magazine, about to attend a session on childhood with Benjamin Law, Alex Miller, and Sonya Hartnett. Law appeared to be the token youth for the event, and vocally acknowledged it. It went as expected, with Miller talking of finding Tolstoy and Dostoevsky (of course), Hartnett holding up books about horses, and Law offering, what I found, was a more relevant an honest account of reading during his teens which closely resembled my own. Often with authors at these festivals, you can get the impression they feel obliged to sound clever, you know, what authors are supposed to sound like. This particular panel was an eclectic mix of honesty, publicity and nostalgia.

“What did you read in high school, Ben?”
“Nothing really, I was busy doing other shit.”
He didn’t say that, but that’s what he meant.

Law then went on to talk about how at some point, he found Stephen King, and how he loved the mental release of the worlds King created. It reminded me of how people under duress often find religion. That same, oh I get it, what-have-I-been-missing-all-my-life moment. I could relate in a way. I never read in high school, not really, and found the solitude of similar books a crowbar into the world of writing, which I was told by my English teacher, was not really my thing.

Hartnett seemed offended at the mention of King as a savoir, and a little shocked to hear Ben’s admiration, finally scoffing that King was an awful writer, and expecting the crowd to erupt with confirmation and chime in accordingly. The awkwardness was noted. Andy and I looked at one another when she said it, wondering what would lead her to say such a thing. Kings literary ability and her own tastes aside, it seemed off form to reduce someone’s love for a writer publicly, when they had just seconds before, spoken so highly of them. It seemed odd, and slightly competitive. I have a suspicion if King had been a festival guest, of which he would have been a headline act, perhaps even the keynote speaker, Hartnett would have chosen her words more carefully, or at least more diplomatically.

The last moment of note was something that caught me by surprise. I was maintaining a pretty viscous illusion to be writing something very worthwhile (I was dicking around on twitter), when Jenny, the festival program manager, came and sat down at my table in the greenroom to see how I was going. She looked exhausted. Jenny worked at the PEN festival in New York, and had joined the Melbourne Writers Festival recently from China, where she spent time running Bookworm in Beijing. We got talking about how things were going, when a quaint old man wobbled in, the kind you’d expect to be the professor at a university who loves nothing more than teaching Egyptology. It was Jostein Gaarder, the Norwegian author of Sophie’s Worlds, a book that’s sold around twenty million copies.

“Sophie’s world!” I said. “That guy, right there?”

It was a moment I wasn’t ready for. I felt comfortable interviewing authors who were blisteringly famous, lit giants and celebrities in their own right, but he was different, the book did something profound for me, something that until that moment, I had forgotten all about.

I stumbled across Sophie’s World after a juvenile relationship went south, and if I was really honest about it, I think it was the first book I really read. I was probably twenty.

The book started me on a binge, almost a decade long, of reading one book after another. It was the catalyst, and much like Stephen King was to Benjamin Law, It was a way for me to transition from one place to another. The creator of that experience was right in front of me, struggling to open the biscuit tin.

To see Jostein Gaarder shuffle over to the kettle in the green room, fiddling awkwardly, burning his hands, reminded me what power books can have over people’s lives and how normal and superhuman the masters of those books can appear when you see them in the flesh. It’s what festivals are all about. They’re about giving opportunities to fans and guests to find new loves, new Sophie’s Worlds, new Stephen Kings, which I guess is why the Melbourne Writers Festival Kids program is so effective and one I found to be a truly valuable endeavour.

If nothing else, the festivals night life is obviously the most elaborate, and the most heinous. Last year, for instance, I found myself drunk at a bar with Wells Tower, only to find myself on a tram, moments later, heading to Fitzroy with the young novelest Jon Bauer and writer Luke May, where we read a copy of McSweeney’s #32 to the patrons of Melbourne’s fine public transportation system. The next week, I read Towers Book, Everything Ravaged, Everything Burned, and was unbelievably impressed – I had found a new friend. This year, I suspect my memories of a wasted DBC Pierre will hold just as strong, and who knows, I might even buy his ridiculously sounding book.

–Brad Dunn is a Melbourne based writer who’s work has appeared in journals and magazines in Australia and overseas, including TorpedoThe Wooden Toy Quarterly, and culture guide, ThreeThousand. http://www.dontthrowbatteries.com
Photography: Jim Lee. Courtesy of Melbourne Writers Festival

JEWCY’s The Greatest 3-Minute Guilt Stories Ever

1. Kosher hunks of meat: Our own Scott Lindenbaum, The Faster Times & BlackBook’s Adam Wilson, The Full Ginsberg & McSweeney’s Jared Bloom, and Harvard Sailing Team and Snakes member Adam Lustick (who has way more YouTube views than you ever will). 2. Jewcy.com’s Editor-in-Chief Jason Diamond, bad Jew and The Daily Beast’s Rebecca Dana, and Jewcy’s publisher Jacob Harris.


Poisson Rouge was the scene of last night’s “Jewcy Presents: The Greatest 3-Minute Guilt Stories Ever.” It was a good crowd in a good atmosphere—upbeat, congenial, casual. Thirteen choice writers shared their pieces about guilt, which were supposed to be under three minutes but, as reader Adam Wilson pointed out, it’s a pretty tall order to ask Jews to confine a story to a mere three minutes. Most of the writings were either nonfiction or fiction written by the reader especially for the event, although there was some poetry (Melissa Broder), some fiction by someone else [Ben Greenman, who was “nonexistent”, a.k.a. in Ireland, but we listened to a recording of him reading “The Death of a Clerk” by Chekov on an iPod, except Cherviakov became Conan O’Brian and Brizzhalov became Larry King (you can read this story for yourself in Greenman’s new book, Celebrity Chekov)], and even a holiday tale written by good Jews’ favorite monger of guilt: their mother (Rachel Shukert, author of Everything is Going to be Great).

If this night was based on the assumption that Jews are good at guilt, then I’d like to add two more sweeping generalizations about Jews, and these fine young Semites in particular:

1)      Jews love death. Over the course of the stories/poems, at least one cat, two grandfathers, and several dozen biblical characters met their demise. And, every time that one of these characters/animals/actual people died, the majority of the audience laughed.

1. The only poet in the room: the lovely Melissa Broder, author of When You Say One Thing but Mean Your Mother.

2)      Jews are fucking funny. Some topics that were covered last night:

  • Jason Diamond (who hosted the event) inadvertently showing his girlfriend’s roommate his poop.
  • Jared Bloom’s affinity for Team Jacob (fine, this was a Torah reference, and had nothing to do with Twilight).
  • Scott Lindenbaum’s adventures with acid, wayward women, and getting beat up by one particularly wayward woman in the nude.
  • Rebecca Dana’s Hassidic rabbi roommate’s consumption of raw bacon.
  • The fact that you should never say “I’m like a cat and you’re the milk” to a woman while going down on her, and you should especially never say this to Jami Attenberg (author of The Melting Season).

Oh, and also, this is to Maris Kreizman’s (of Slaughterhouse 90210) parents: Your daughter’s piece was actually about sex. Additionally, she owns — and uses— a vibrator.

–Julia Jackson is working on her MFA in fiction at Brooklyn College, and is a regular contributor for Electric Dish.

Illustrators Wild at Belcourt

1. Illustrators Joanna Nebrosky & André da Loba, with artist Lisel Ashlock creeping in the background. 2. Wild scene of illustration admirers.


Another night, another wild literary event. This time it was a release party for artist Joanna Neborsky, whose book is a collection of twenty-eight drawing & collage illustrations inspired by the Novels in Three Lines of “suspected terrorist, art-world tastemaker, and literary instigator” Félix Fénéon. [Neborsky also created an EL single-sentence animation accompanying Patrick DeWitt's story "The Bastard"] Literary world, you’re wearing us out, with release parties like these, we’ll never get any rest.

1. Wanted photo of this woman with an amazing hat. Turned out to be Joanna’s grandmother. 2. Books & Booksellers.

1. Max & Arthur who followed a flyer they found in Park Slope on Sunday to the release. 2. Publisher Mark Batty with an adult beverage.


Covered by Anna Prushinskaya.

“People Unlike Airplanes” by Jim Hanas

“This, or this?” the young woman asked, tapping her nails on two photographs arrayed on the fold-out tray between herself and the subject—a man who had been complaining since at least Kansas City that the blood-pressure cuff was irritating his eczema. He rolled his head and looked out the window, down on what must have been Denver.

“This,” he said, indicating one of the pictures with a nod.
“I’ll need a hand signal,” she said. “For the cameras.”

The man tapped an electrode-wrapped forefinger on one of the photos. The woman propped her glasses on her nose and recorded his response before arranging two more photographs on the tray.

“This, or this?” she repeated, tapping her nails to draw the man’s attention back from what must have been Boulder. The man was tired of answering questions and was glad it wouldn’t be much longer before they landed. The knot of his tie had slid to half-mast and moist stains bloomed where his arms met his torso. He wanted to change his shirt. How much longer, exactly, would it be?
“I’ll ask the questions,” the woman said, again tapping her nails on the tray.

The young woman’s lab coat was sexy, the man thought without considering the pictures. The hum of the engines was sexy and the woman’s incessantly tapping nails—these were sexy, too. He considered her knees, which were the color of carrot cake, as they appeared between her blue lab coat and her tall, tight boots, and he contemplated having sex with her—right then and there—in the aisle of the modified Airbus 320 in which he now found himself more or less imprisoned.

“It’s time for your taste test,” said another woman who appeared at his side with a serving cart. She placed two tiny paper cups of fizzy, brown liquid on the fold-out tray. Bill Hammerling took a sip from each cup before the woman opposite him tapped their rims with her nails.
“This, or this?”

He smiled but the young woman did not smile back.

Simmons had been in rooms like this before. Lots of times. As a teenager, he had groped at the breasts and buttoned flies of girls named Kat, and Kate, and Katie, and Katherine in rooms more or less exactly like this one. Such rooms—right inside the front door, just off the foyer—were never used, in his experience, except for such hapless late-night purposes. Children were forbidden from entering rooms like these, he remembered, and growing up he had witnessed many homes engulfed in jubilant chaos—littered with board games, piles of laundry, and slot-racing tracks—that somehow stopped at the threshold of this room. Looking through the doorway, then like now, was like staring into the soothing waters of an aquarium.

He had been shown in by a boy on the front lawn who was busy driving a softball deep into the freshly laid sod with a lacrosse stick. He was probably thirteen. His blonde hair was tangled and he smelled like stale hockey equipment. He grudgingly stomped up the stairs to get his stepmother, while Simmons braced for her arrival.

He had never met Bill Hammerling’s wife before, not this one, and he had not seen Bill himself in ten years, although his name had still jumped off the page. Bill had done well. The faux Queen Anne in which Simmons now stood was among the first to be completed in the surrounding development, and the home—elevated on a slight hillock—was plainly visible from the Tudor model home that marked the entrance to the neighborhood. Simmons had weaved his way toward it carefully, slaloming through the wooden stakes that marked the future placement of streets and driveways. The streets were not yet marked, but Bill’s circular driveway was clearly labeled—with both name and address—on a mailbox poised atop a length of anchor chain welded to maintain the posture of an angry cobra.

Kitty Hammerling was girlish, Simmons noted as she appeared at the top of the steps.

“Can I help you?” she asked.

Her blonde hair was pulled into a ponytail high on the back of her head, and she might have been mistaken for a college student—in her khaki Capri’s and oversized T-shirt tied to the side—if not for an enormous trio of diamonds that hung from her wedding ring.

Simmons’ paramilitary appearance no doubt took her by surprise. The company’s founders were Navy men, and they had imparted to FreeBird Airlines a martial structure. Everyone wore uniforms, although the one Simmons wore was barely distinguishable from those worn by pharmacists or busboys. It consisted of a crisp white shirt with basic cotton epaulets and an embossed crest positioned above his heart. The second Mrs. Hammerling (or was she the third?) might have easily mistaken him for the exterminator.

“There’s been an accident,” Simmons said. He held out an arm to suggest they might talk more comfortably in the forbidden room, the room that he had understood since childhood was for important matters only—the appearance of clergy, funerals and christenings, and matters like this.

Kitty Hammerling turned ashen as she understood that this was no good. She perched on the edge of the white couch while Simmons took one of the stiff chairs, his aluminum briefcase sandwiched between his ankles.

“Bill’s plane has gone down,” he said.

Kitty Hammerling started to cry.

Simmons didn’t know what to do. He had thought about it for the entire drive and had still failed to come up with an answer. He leaned forward and rested his elbows on his knees, like he might reach out and touch her if it became necessary, although he didn’t know when, exactly, that would be. He wondered what FreeBird’s legal department would recommend.

She covered her face and he could see that her fingers were unusually long and that the thin bones in the backs of her hands pulsed under her soft, tanned skin like gently throbbing veins. She had dark, fine hair on her forearms, he could now see, and also on her cheeks.

She got up and left the room. Simmons remained seated and wondered if he should leave. Maybe that’s what she expected—for him to leave. He closed his eyes and tried to remember the opening line of the prayer for the Can having gone down but could only remember the last: “People, unlike airplanes, look larger from farther away,” the unofficial motto of FreeBird Airlines.

Like most mottos, it meant different things to different people. To FreeBird’s clients, it meant that consumers’ cherished preferences might seem inscrutable from a distance, but never fear, they could be made clear by well-conceived batteries of tests administered to captive audiences of air travelers who agreed to submit to such scrutiny in exchange for free flights to demographically rich destinations like Indianapolis, Chicago, and (until this morning) Los Angeles. To FreeBird’s army of commission-starved account executives, it meant that a client might seem unapproachable—unsellable—from a distance, but close up, each was as vulnerable as the next to FreeBird’s ingenious sales pitch. And to FreeBird’s passengers? Great care was taken to ensure that FreeBird’s passengers never heard the unofficial motto.

Kitty Hammerling returned, clutching a wad of tissues.

“I brought Bill’s file,” Simmons offered as he eased it out of his briefcase. It was in a worn interoffice folder, its crimson string wound tightly around the two-ply fastening-disk. It had been carefully edited to preserve Bill’s preferences for salmon (the color) and Magneto (the font), and to redact his fascination with the tanning cream and tall black boots that had been indirectly tested (ambiently, as they say) on his ill-fated flight. (“Leering” was the word that appeared again and again in the qualitatives.)
“That’s nice,” his wife managed, although Simmons could tell it provided little comfort. While people often put great stock in their loved ones’ files, there was still this sting.
“Did you know him?” she asked quietly.
“We were in the Navy.”
“In the gulf?”
“And the straits, too. Persian. Tonkin. Gibraltar. Hormuz.”
“You were close?” she asked.
“As close as you can be and not talk in ten years,” Simmons said.
She smiled weakly.
“That’s his son?” Simmons asked.

She nodded, grinding back more tears. It was clear that the boy’s only link to his stepmother was through his father and without him, they might not get along so well.

Mrs. Hammerling suddenly wilted, like she was about to faint, and Simmons forgot all about FreeBird’s lawyers as he leaned forward and grabbed her elbows, hoping to steady her, as the front door slammed and the scent of hockey equipment leaked into the clean white room.

“You’ve got to help me tell him,” she whispered, and Simmons realized that the boy—slouching into view now, smirking—was at once the largest and smallest creature in the known universe. Smaller than the whale, smaller than the elephant, yet still larger than the lowly airplane.

–Jim Hanas is the author of the short story collection Why They Cried – forthcoming this month as a Joyland eBook from ECW Press – from which this excerpt was taken. He reads tonight at McNally Jackson Books in Manhattan with Joyland co-founder Emily Schultz, Zoe Whithall, and Amanda Stern.

Photo courtesy of http://www.aviationspectator.com/

Copper Canyon LISTENING PARTY

1. Poet Ari Kalinowski at the bar beforehand. 2. Poets Ken Walker and Mary Austin Speaker.

Poetry-exclusive  Copper Canyon Press staged a listening party at Littlefield in Gowanus Sunday evening, 1.4 miles from Borough Hall, in the rain, on a side street of casketmakers, hours after the Brooklyn Book Festival had closed its doors and stacked its chairs. In 2005 Copper Canyon made waves when its books garnered both a Pulitzer Prize and a National Book Award, and the press is known for its consistently top tier publications and its non-profit financial structure. Readers at the event were Ben Lerner (Angle of Yaw, Mean Free Path),  Brenda Shaughnessy (Human Dark with Sugar, Interior with Sudden Joy),  Chris Martin, (American Music), and  Mark Bibbins (The Dance of No Hard Feelings), a cross-section of Copper Canyon’s upcoming best and brightest poets. In fact, of any event affiliated with this year’s Fest, the listening party lineup constituted the most relevant poets writing the most rigorous poetry to appear in Brooklyn this weekend. Maybe next year organizers will see fit to include this much heavy-lifting in the Festival’s general programing.

Read the rest of this entry »

ALL THINGS BROOKLYN BOOKFEST

BORDER CROSSING

Maaza Mengiste (left) + Shteyngart & Urrea Blurs (right)

Maaza Mengiste (left) + Shteyngart & Urrea blurs (right)

On account of the rain that washed over the second half of the Brooklyn Book Festival, the International Stage was relocated to a lecture hall inside St. Francis College. The fluorescent lighting overhead made the new Border Crossing venue seem more classroom than literary lounge. “Welcome to Econ 101,” said moderator Robert Spillman (Tin House) to open the evening’s seminar.

The writers themselves served as lessons in geography and history: Luís Alberto Urrea (Into the Beautiful North) was born in Tijuana, Maaza Mengiste (Beneath the Lion’s Gaze) hails from Ethiopia, and Gary Shteyngart (Super Sad True Love Story) is a product of “St. Leninsburg.”

In spite of their dissimilar backgrounds, as “international writers” the trio had much in common. They all found that a new location was beneficial to their understanding of the places they portray in their work.

Mengiste used distance as a tool, one that offers new perspective and authority. Urrea said that while writing Hummingbird’s Daughter, “some of the most specific things about Mexico came to me in France.” Shteyngart added that he preferred to write in locations where he didn’t speak the language.

“I wrote most of [Super Sad True Love Story] in Italy—where they speak Spanish, I think.”

The writers all agreed they had trouble being labeled by their backgrounds.  “Mexicans call me a gringo, while Americans call me a Mexican writer,” Urrea said.

Shteygart claimed the Russian reviews of his novel read “Balding traitors betrays motherland.” But he did see some benefit. “Being an immigrant writer is lucrative,” Shteyngart said, adding that his publisher has a literary bat signal that illuminates the skyline whenever an international panel needs an oppressed writer.

Shteyngart also reflected on the premonitions of his satire (much of Super Sad True Love Story had to be rewritten because what seemed absurd when he was writing in 2006 came true in 2008). “That’s the trouble of being a smart ass: reality moves much too fast,” said Shteyngart.  “After this I’m just going to be a blogger.”

Covered by Benjamin Samuel.

PRIMAL IMPULSES AND PROSE

1. MG. 2.Writer Charles and emerging adult Abigail, waiting in line for The World in Fiction panel, with Jabari Asim, Russell Banks, and Mona Simpson.

People were lining up around the block, in the (almost) rain, preceding the Primal Impulses and Prose panel. “This is a booky clusterfuck!” I texted my editor. And it was.

Each of the three panelists (Mary Gaitskill, Ben Greenman, & Simon Van Booy) read a selection showcasing some kind of Primal Impulse. This led to an emotionally intense reading, so it was nice when Ben Greenman deviated from said topic for a moment to read his short “Blurbs”, which, as the piece states for itself, was kind of like if the blurbs from “The Bridges of Madison County and the blurbs from Infinite Jest” met and had a baby. Gaitskill managed to take a few breaks from looking intense and severe, and even smiled a couple times and cracked a few jokes. I appreciated her deflection of moderator Harold Augenbraum’s  question, who asked something about her intent when repeating the word “soul” so often in her story “Mirror Ball.” She said it wasn’t artistic – it was unavoidable. It was what the story was about, like how they use the word “ring” a lot in The Lord of the Rings.

POETRY AND PROSE

Monica Ferrell, Phillip Lopate, Katha Pollitt, and Maureen N. McLane took on the topic of “Poetry and Prose” and how the two forms informed and differed from each other. “One thing sends me to the other,” stated Pollitt. “…and they don’t always help each other. Sometimes poetry helps out the prose, but not the other way around.” Lopate said that poetry starts, for him, as a “churning in (his) gut”, and Ferrell agreed, saying that both her poetry and fiction writing required some sort of other-wordly inspiration, but poetry was more of a rhythm thing, while fiction had to do with a line of dialogue, or the ways that two characters interact. This was a group, as moderator Meghan O’Rourke described, that was “polymorphously perverse.”

THE WORLD IN FICTION

By 4 p.m. the crowd was soaked, many of them having just stood in the rain to hear Sarah Silverman and David Rakoff in front of the courthouse. Inside the building, Jabari Asim, Russell Banks, and Mona Simpson prepared to discuss The World in Fiction. The three panelists agreed that they preferred to write about characters that were on the fringe of major sociological events, or perhaps in the middle of them. As Banks said, one of fiction’s greatest strengths is that it is able to make dignified the inner lives of human beings, in a way that other art forms cannot. Because of this, he is able to get inside such difficult characters as the one in his upcoming novel, The Lost Memory of Skin, which is about a convicted sex offender living under the causeway in Miami. The authors also discussed why they preferred to write fictional narratives about events that happened to them in their own lives. Simpson said she preferred fiction because “life is too messy” and fiction gives it some structure.

Covered by Julia Jackson.

ONE STORY, ONE BOROUGH

1. One Story, One Borough-ers. 2. Not “acoustically wet,” just rainy.


Earlier this week, in the lead up to the Brooklyn Book Festival, One Story magazine dispatched volunteers to Brooklyn subway stations to hand out back issues featuring three Brooklyn-based writers. This Sunday those writers were on hand at BookFest to read from their work. However, because of rain that had already fallen and more rain that was yet to fall, the “One Story, One Borough” event was moved from an outdoor stage into the atrium of the Brooklyn Borough Hall.

All three readers tackled the new surroundings head on. James Hannaham (God Says No), up first and reading from his story “Interrupted Serenade,” noted that the atrium was the most “acoustically wet” space he’d ever read in and, though claiming not to be a singer, offered a few bars of “Amazing Grace” to take advantage of the vibrato.

Reif Larsen (The Selected Works of T.S. Spivet), reading from his story “The Puppet,” used the institutional echo to set the scene for his reading, inviting the audience to imagine the bombed-out library in 1995 Sarajevo that figures in the end of his story. Mr. Larsen then unflinchingly read from a separate, library-less scene much earlier in “The Puppet.”

Nonetheless, the scene-setting approach was stirring enough that Caedra Scott-Flaherty, the final reader, invoked it herself, ironically asking the crowd to imagine the echoing atrium as a car driving south through Mexico. Silently, and without fuss, the crowd rose to the challenge.

After the readings, when alerted to the Brooklyn-based motif of the event, Mr. Hannaham admitted that he thought the readers being locals was a matter of convenience, not theme. He lives only a short walk from the Borough Hall plaza where the festival was held. But the rain made nothing convenient on Sunday. Mr. Hannaham took the train to his relocated reading.

Covered by Judson Merrill.

FINDING THE FUNNY

1. Hodgman, bringing chair to justice. 2. All panelists, preparing with care.

Predictably, the writers on the Brooklyn Book Festival’s panel Finding the Funny: The Humor of the Everyday immediately turned the hallowed Borough Hall Courtroom into a circus. Humorists John Hodgman (The Areas of My Expertise), Sloane Crosley (How Did You Get This Number), and Kristen Schaal and Rich Blomquist (The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex) immediately took the initiative to move from the tables on the floor to preside over their audience from judge’s table above.

Microphones were rewired, chairs passed around, and seating rearranged while Hodgman appealed to the audience. “Does anyone here have a copy of my book?” It wasn’t a poll, he’d forgotten to bring a copy with him.

When all was settled and sufficiently feng shui, moderator Dan Fierman (GQ) called court into session by comparing comedy to pornography. “What does it for you, doesn’t necessarily do it for me.”

After reading from a borrowed copy of his compendium Areas of my Expertise, Hodgman threw the paperback into the audience—he drew the line of at the hardcover, though, that’d be going to far.

“This book will save lives,” said Schaal, who read an ode inspired by the Vagina Monologues. Never before has a taint been saluted in a courtroom without the speaker being held in contempt.

Asked by the audience whether he was concerned about exposing his best material on Twitter, Hodgman (who has close to 450,000 followers) said there was nothing to be gained by holding back material, adding “if you’re holding back, you’re ashamed of it.”

That’s what she said.

Covered by Benjamin Samuel.

The Literature of Dread

A miserable memory. The year, I think, was 1970. I was six, maybe seven. My father was a foreign correspondent for the Associated Press, stationed in Paris, and I attended a French primary school.

The French school system at the time was the same old-fashioned authoritarian institution that had inspired defiant works of art like The 400 Blows and Zero de Conduite. French schools were still rigidly centralized—it was said that the Minister of National Education could look at his watch at any hour of the school day and know what lesson was being taught in every classroom in the country. The system allowed corporal punishment even for trivial infractions.

Punishment in our school was administered in a sadistically protracted manner: the misbehaving pupil, rather than being disciplined right away by the teacher, was placed in the hall, just outside the doorway of the classroom. The principal made his rounds of the corridors several times an hour and spanked every child he found cowering in the doorways.

One day the teacher put me in the hall for doodling in my notebook instead of copying the lesson plan. The punishment was painful—four sharp blows on the bottom with a stiff open palm. Grimmer still was the humiliation of being returned to the classroom with a faceful of hot tears to endure the silent jeering of classmates and the teacher’s triumphant smugness. But worst of all was the anticipation. The school occupied a big, imposing old building, and if a lot of children misbehaved that period and you found yourself at the far end of the principal’s circuit, it could take him quite a while to reach you. The corridors were wide and curving, the floors were uncarpeted and the ceilings were high; you could hear the principal’s heavy footsteps long before you saw him. I remember trying to make myself invisible by flattening my body against the doorway and praying, though our family was not religious, to be spared.

This experience was my introduction to the psychology of dread, which I think of as not just as extreme, paralyzing fear, but fear of the imminent, of the inevitable. As when an animal is first caught in a trap, in the state of dread, the body and the mind are immobilized and wildly active at the same time.

The apprentice writer receives a great deal of instruction in the ways of suspense: he is taught to delay his climactic points, to put switchbacks, twists, and false bottoms in the plot; possibly, like Brian De Palma or Shirley Jackson, to save the greatest shock for the very end. Plotted on a graph, the well-made suspenseful work of fiction or film might look like a series of progressively higher peaks.

Suspense is a pleasurable emotion, dependent on convention. As Hitchcock put it:

Some people are talking about baseball—they don’t know it but there’s a bomb under the table. The conversation has suddenly become charged. The bomb must never go off…you’ve deprived the audience of release: a foot touches the bomb, out the window it goes, just in time.

Other artists break this convention and there is a large body count, but, almost always, someone is spared. And it is our nature that we always identify with living characters; just as in our dreams, we can never really die.

But dread negates suspense. There is no pleasurable uncertainty—no escape—because the outcome is foreknown. The work which is based not on suspense but on dread, if plotted on a graph would look like a steadily rising straight line ending in a preordained point. Or it might resemble something else—a piece of music like Ravel’s Bolero—a reiteration of the same melody but progressively louder, more intense, more emphatic.

The great imminent, inevitable experience in life is, of course, death. ‘Most things never happen; this one will,’ wrote Philip Larkin, the poet laureate of dread.

In fiction or dramatic art, dread often makes itself felt in the form of dramatic irony, where we know something the characters don’t. In Greek tragedies like Oedipus Rex, dramatic irony confirms, with heavy regret, that those who defy the gods are destined for a dire end. In fiction, comics, and movies based on fundamentalist religion, dramatic irony shows us that the characters who have not accepted fundamentalist tenets are hellfire bait, though they are of course unaware of it.

In Aharon Appelfeld’s novel, Badenheim 1939, dramatic irony becomes something more complex.

The title tells us that we are in a spa in the German-speaking world on the eve of the Second World War. Ten pages in, we know that this is a resort town for the Jewish middle class and that its occupants pay little attention to the approaching conflict. The faceless functionaries of the Sanitation Department mysteriously show up, register all persons of Jewish ancestry, and encourage them to emigrate to Poland. The residents of Badenheim, rather than making preparations to flee, marvel at the Sanitation Department’s efficiency and professionalism. In other words, within a few chapters, we know, as the book’s characters do not, that they are doomed.

The characters are, as most of us would be, too caught up in their own worries and status anxieties to notice the greater danger lurking. They resist moving to Poland not because it would mean extinction but because Poland is associated with low-status Ostjuden – Eastern European Jews.

Badenheim 1939 is, like almost all narratives written by Holocaust survivors, a deeply unconsoling work. Unlike, say, the film of Schindler’s List (about which one critic remarked that only Steven Spielberg could make a feel-good movie about the Holocaust), there is no redemptive moral, no triumph of the human spirit.

There is also no depiction of brutality, or even of the camps themselves. When this novel was published in 1980, renderings of the camps had reached a critical mass, and every writer who described them risked producing a kind of Holocaust pornography. So there are no camps, but there is also no afterwards from which we might draw perspective or consolation. There is only the increasingly airless and fantastical atmosphere in the mountain town, and the persistent denial and illusioned optimism of the residents. At the very end of the book, when they are on a train to the camps, one of characters remarks hopefully, “If the coaches are so dirty, it must mean we have not so far to go.”

By not giving us the worst, in other words, Appelfeld lets us imagine the worst.

Badenheim 1939 is in its tightly controlled way, a very angry work, but Appelfeld uses dramatic irony to an empathetic end: because we know the ultimate fate of Badenheim’s residents before they do, we keenly feel the dread –we suffer, as much as readers who are removed, safe and comfortable can be said to suffer–before the characters do.

I can think of no other work of art, even King Lear, in which the feeling of dread is so viscerally persistent. Reading Badenheim 1939 corresponds to Andrew Solomon’s evocation of the paralyzing anxiety of a major depression:


If you trip or slip, there is a moment, before your hand shoots out to break your fall, when you feel the earth rushing up at you and you cannot help yourself — a passing, fraction-of-a-second horror.[It’s like that] hour after hour.

Here, the fate of the residents of Badenheim is the earth rushing up at you hour after hour, the about-to-happen, that imminent terrible event.

* * *

John Broening’s Column Note.

—John Broening is a chef and writer based in Denver, Colorado. His work has appeared in the Baltimore Sun, the Baltimore City Paper, Gastronomica, Edible Front Range, and the Denver Post, for whom he writes a weekly column about food.

Photo: A still from The 400 Blows.

Lit Crawl 2010…!

So we were running late, and only caught the tail end of our first event of Lit Crawl NYC, which was Soft Skull Night at Solas. Julia did manage to hear enough of Richard Poplak’s piece to know that it was about Kazakhstan and Borat, which was weird considering she’d been watching it the night before.

1. SWAP NYC contingent gathered at the Yippie Cafe, before we moved on to the street. 2. Writer & editor of The Rumpus Stephen Elliott, reading under a tree, accompanied by the sound of motorcycles.

Read the rest of this entry »

John Waters & Carolyn Kellogg at Coco66

1. Gloria & Jennifer, who attended the Waters event to support their friend Carolyn Kellogg. Fave Waters movies: Hairspray & Crybaby. 2. Rob & Paulina. Rob wants you to know that he wears glasses, and reading is fun.

Last night marked the beginning of the Brooklyn Book Festival weekend, and brought acclaimed cult film director John Waters to Greenpoint to discuss, among other things, the release of his new book Role Models with LA Times staff writer Carolyn Kellogg. The event was held in the back room of Coco66, and felt more like a rock show than a literary event—fitting for a man like Waters. The room was packed, which made sense considering tickets ($25, and included a copy of Role Models) sold out the preceding Monday. Waters spoke with Kellogg on stage and then answered some audience questions before signing books and taking pictures with his adoring fans.

Read the rest of this entry »

BK BOOKFEST: Just the Kickoff

Aside from running out of batteries just a few pics in (thanks for being my back-up, iPhone) and taking almost no notes (sparse scribbles about silver foxes), covering Greenlight’s Brooklyn Indie Party, the kickoff event for Brooklyn Bookfest, went off without a hitch.

“Celebrating the spirit of independence” were A Public Space, Akashic Books, Archipelago, Armchair/Shotgun, BOMB Magazine, Hanging Loose Press, Ig Publishing, Melville House, One Story, powerHouse Books, Tin House, and EL, with Johnny Temple and Dave Tompkins on the turntables.

1. Scene at the EL Office prior to BK Indie Party. Looks like tea time, but it’s not. 2. Scene at Greenlight, taken on approach to wine line, which ends on the other side of this crowd.

Read the rest of this entry »