Our Family History, Packed in Mom’s Garage

“You’ll Be Honest, You’ll Be Brave”
by Kelli Jo Ford

Justine pulled into Lula’s as the morning sun began to glow behind the hills. She sat in her truck trying to massage the feeling back into her legs after the long drive, as sleepy birds chirped from the power line on the far side of the gravel road. After being on the Cherokee Nation’s list for so long that she forgot she was on it, her mother Lula had finally gotten her dream house in the country. The small three-bedroom rancher with green shutters overlooked Little Locust Creek, where a cloud of fog wafted into the humid air, leaving a dreamy haze over everything. Under different circumstances it would be a peaceful place to come home to.

Sheila already had her purse on her arm when Justine stepped stiffly inside. Sheila’s eyes looked tired, but her bun, teased and sprayed at the back of her head, didn’t betray a single stray hair. She gave Justine a long hug.

“Sorry I have to get to work, Teeny,” Sheila said. “I wish I could stay with you.”

“Don’t know what we’d do without you,” Justine said. She looked toward the closed bedroom door. No matter how Justine tried to square things in her mind or heart, coming home broke her open. She was not accustomed to being unable to contain what spilled out. “How is she?”

“Sleeping now,” Sheila said, leading Justine into the kitchen. “She hasn’t had a spell since right after I got here yesterday.” Sheila opened the fridge and pulled out a big mason jar of brown liquid. “I made her some bone broth. That might perk her up some.”

Justine hugged Sheila again and began to cry. She could rest her head on Sheila’s, so she did.

Sheila, tiny and full of movement even at rest, always made Justine think of her daughter Reney. Sheila had gone back to the church—and Samuel—after Justine and Reney moved back to Texas that last time. With baby crow’s-feet in the corners of her eyes, Sheila could have been nearly any one of the women Justine grew up with, perpetually on the verge of middle age and capable of anything from banging out a hymn on the piano to tying up her skirt and tacking a shingle back in place to making a pot of beans for sick neighbors with a baby on her hip.

Reney, meanwhile, was aging in reverse, it seemed. After she’d left that prick, she traversed the country picking up work as banquet waitstaff wherever she decided to pass time. Now she was a college student in Portland, Oregon, of all places. Finding herself.

“We’ve got to trust the Lord,” Sheila said. “All we can do.”

“Y’all go to the doctor now, don’t you?” Justine said. “Can’t you talk to Mama?” She eased herself into a chair at the same kitchen table she’d eaten at as a girl, picked up a packet of syrup from a bowl, and began to fiddle with it.

“She’s old-time Holiness like Daddy. Plus . . .” Sheila said with shrug, “she’s too ornery.” She smiled. “She’ll be happy to see you. She talks about you, Josie, and Dee all the time.”

“I don’t know why she won’t go to Tennessee and live with them. There’s Holiness churches out there. Beautiful country. Two daughters who love her.”

“Whoa, sufficient unto the day!” Sheila said, smiling and waving her hands to show she wanted no part of that argument. “Samuel went and got her car. Amazingly, it’s not much worse for the wear. Muddy mainly, a couple of scrapes, but fine.”

“That’s about right,” Justine said.

“I know, isn’t that something!” Sheila laughed and shook her head in wonder. “God is good.” She gathered her keys and headed toward the door. “Samuel will bring the car over later today.”

“Wish he wouldn’t.”

“I’m not brave enough to fight that battle either,” Sheila said as she closed the front door and left them alone.

Justine stood in Lula’s doorway a long time before going in and sitting on the edge of the bed. When Lula woke up, she smiled.

“Miss my baby.” Lula ran her tongue around her dry lips. “I suppose they told you I had a spell?” She looked toward the wall. “Sheila said my car isn’t here?”

“No, Mama,” Justine said. “Your car isn’t here.”

Lula patted Justine’s hand, closed her eyes, and said, “We will get it tomorrow.”


When Justine had gotten the call from Dee, her oldest sister, she’d been on the phone with Reney, putting another new zip code in her address book so she could send the old photos Reney’d been asking for. Justine clicked over, and before she could get out a hello, Dee’s voice cut in.

Lula had the seizure while she was out on one of her countryside drives, taking in scenery she’d seen a million times—probably on her way home from McDonald’s. Thankfully, she’d only run through somebody’s barbed wire fence. No one was hurt, though she was still having the seizure when a man stopped and called 911. Lula came to in the back of the ambulance and demanded to be brought home.

“When can you get up there?” Dee asked.

Justine closed her address book, put fifty dollars in Reney’s card, and sealed it shut.

“Teeny?”

“This is why I wish she’d come out there with y’all,” Justine started in. “Or at the very least, let them take her to the hospital. At least we’d have time to figure out a couple things.”

“You know we can’t make her do anything she doesn’t want to do,” Dee said.

“The bank’s going to come get my truck if I don’t get their check mailed,” Justine said. She could hear Dee tapping on computer keys.

“I’m looking for tickets for me and Josie, but I don’t know when we can get there.”

“I don’t know how long I can stay,” Justine said, but when she got off the phone, she set about doing all the things she needed to do: leaving a message for her boss, shoving Reney’s pictures and card into a box to mail later, writing Pitch a list he’d ignore, grabbing the bills that most desperately needed to be paid, running deodorant across her armpits because she just got off work and didn’t have time to shower, slinging shit into a bag, running by the Smokehouse to grab some brisket and beans since Lula ran the roads too much to stock a cupboard, and, finally, driving through the night.

Now here Justine sat, back in Beulah Springs, propped up on a pillow next to Lula, reading her the Gospel of John as she dozed. After Samuel dropped off the car, she had hidden the keys behind a dusty can of commodity orange juice in a kitchen cabinet. By evening, Lula was up, pouring herself Mountain Dew and wanting to ride to McDonald’s. Justine microwaved her a plate of brisket and beans and told her to be thankful she wasn’t wrapped around a telephone pole. Feeling bad for that one, she’d then taken her for a drive to watch the sun set over Tenkiller.

Justine was sitting in the living room flipping though a Reader’s Digest when Dee and Josie showed up late that night. They came in dragging suitcases and bag after bag of crap. They’d already stopped by Walmart and bought the store. Josie carried in a television with a built-in DVD player.

“You know Mama’s going to lose her mind when she sees that thing,” Justine said.

“I told her.” Dee dropped her purse beside the couch and plopped next to Justine.

“I’m not showing it to her, are you?” whispered Josie, as she heaved the box into the other bedroom and closed the door.

“How is she?” Dee asked. “The car doesn’t look so bad.”

“You know,” Justine said. “Still slow and groggy but getting back right.” She tossed the Reader’s Digest aside. “Whatever that is.”

Dee ran her fingers through the short hair she kept dyed strawberry blonde. Bracelets on her wrist jangled. “Bless her heart,” she said finally. “And yours. She driving you crazy yet?”

“Asking for her keys,” Justine said. “That’s all she’s really worried about. She knows she shouldn’t be driving.”

“Can’t nobody tell that woman what to do,” Josie said, forgetting to whisper as she walked into the kitchen. She had already dressed in her satin pajamas and had a sleep mask propped on her forehead. “About like somebody else I know, huh, Teeny?”

Justine and Dee shushed her at the same time.

“I’m just saying, the woman’s hardheaded. She’s going to do what she’s going to do, whether it’s run the roads or flush her meds.” Josie had come back into the living room with a plate of cold brisket. “I don’t know how we lasted sixteen or eighteen or however many years with her.” She sat on the other side of Dee and sawed on the meat with the side of her fork.

“You both left my ass as quick as you could,” Justine said. She was trying to make a joke, but it didn’t come out right.

Dee put an arm around her and pulled her closer.

“Mama did the best she could,” Justine said. “But the way we were raised up . . . it’s kept us from . . .” She had that feeling again. She wanted to get in her truck, point it south, and turn the radio up so loud she could not think. She could point it west for all she cared, as long as she got gone.

“At least Granny was here,” she said, finally. “For my sake and Mama’s.” She was crying again, and now so were her sisters. “I’d handle being beaten every day better than what went on inside my head.” She wiped her face.

“Mama tried that too,” Josie said.

Dee whacked her with a pillow.

“Hell,” Justine said. “I don’t even know what goes on inside my head.”


By Sunday, Lula was back to herself, or so the sisters thought. She threw them a curve and skipped Sunday school. After exchanging a round of looks and whispers, they took her to McDonald’s for her beloved flapjacks and then piled back in the car and drove her to Brushy Mountain. Lula didn’t say much unless she was pointing out a bird or a rock formation she probably could have mapped. Dee and Josie oohed and aahed, pretending the scrub hills were as majestic as Lula thought. Justine did her best to keep quiet.

By the time they got back to the house, Justine’s back was on fire. Since she’d hurt it slinging a broken pallet into the dumpster at work, she couldn’t sit long, and the drive up had just about done her in. She did best when she kept moving, so she decided to work in the garage, which was stacked with boxes they’d hauled over from the attic of the last rent house. Dee and Josie got busy in the flower beds, and when Lula wasn’t dozing, she stood over them giving directions.

It was a fight to get Lula to let anything go. Ketchup packets and McDonald’s napkins bulged from kitchen drawers; stacks of Styrofoam coffee cups lined the counters. The garage wasn’t much better. Half the crap was junk, useless stuff that lacked even sentimental value. The other half: photo albums and Lula’s old artwork that had been left in the heat. If Lula didn’t care any more about it than this, Justine figured she could clean it up and take what she wanted for Reney. She told herself she was saving the trouble of having to do it later, with the added benefit of getting to it before her sisters. She told herself she wasn’t worried about getting caught.

When she leaned her ear to the thin door that separated Lula’s bedroom from the garage, she heard nothing from inside but the pull chain clinking against the light in the ceiling fan. She adjusted the box fan whirling in the heat of the open garage door. Then she wiped sweat from her forehead and dug into a dusty cardboard box with DREFT stamped on the outside. Pulling out a warped photo album, she listened for Lula one more time. Then she dusted off the cover and started flipping.

She stopped at a photo of Reney, who couldn’t have been more than two, sitting on Granny’s lap. Reney was doing this thing she’d always done to whoever was holding her: pinching and rubbing elbow skin. But Granny, of course, was wearing long sleeves, so it was really polyester that Reney was rubbing.

In Portland, Reney was taking on debt to study books she could have read for free, as far as Justine could tell. Her Reney, who after high school had become such a hard woman, so cautious with money and closed off. Sometimes it seemed this kid she’d more or less grown up with, the girl she’d loved and fought with and rocked in the night—her daughter, her very soul—was a whole different person.

Reney called whatever it was she was going through her rebirth. She lived in a communal house of some sort and dated two different men that she called feminists. She’d taken to asking questions about her “Cherokee heritage” when she called home, wanting to hear old stories. Justine had stories aplenty; few that she cared to tell. Nonetheless, she found herself telling them all.

It was often late at night when Reney called. She asked for Justine’s advice, something she’d never done back home. They could talk for hours now that she was gone. Justine wondered what Reney was doing right then. She thought about calling her.

Justine jumped when she heard footsteps. She shoved the album into the box she’d set aside for Reney and felt relieved to see Dee standing beneath the garage door.

“We’re about to go to Walmart. Need anything?”

“Again?” Justine said. She stood and stretched her back. “Josie better take that damn TV back.”

“I told her, but you know—”

“You know what?” Josie said, peering over Dee’s shoulder. She was the middle sister but had always behaved more like the baby.

“Mama finds your devil box, all hell’s going to break loose,” Justine said, going back to her sorting.

“She finds my TV, I’m directing her to the ice chest full of Coors Light in your truck.”

“You can’t even get any channels out here,” Justine said.

“I’ve got a whole season of ER. Clooney’s an Oklahoma boy, you know. We’re the same age. If I’d played my cards right and not run off with old whatshisname, maybe we would have got married.”

“Bullshit,” Justine said. “Bring back bleach. Did you see the bathroom? I swear Mama’s eyes are slipping. Her nose too.”

“Well her ears aren’t, so you two better pipe down,” Dee said.


Justine was in a groove when Lula opened the door leading from her bedroom into the garage. She wore house shoes, but her hair was neatly braided. She held bobby pins in her mouth as she wrapped her braid around itself on the top of her head. Justine noticed a piece of paper stuck to her cheek. It looked like a tiny curled tail growing out of her face. Justine was compelled to go wipe it away—she knew it would embarrass Lula—but she was feeling annoyed at her own fear over nearly being caught.

“You need your rest, Mama,” Justine said.

“I get lonesome for my girls. Thought you all might like to drive to McDonald’s.”

“Dee and Josie went to the store,” Justine said. “I’m sorting through all this junk.”

“Those folks behind the counter love me,” Lula said. “They treat me like a queen.” The paper stuck fast to Lula’s cheek as she spoke. It looked like it had come from inside the ring of a spiral notebook.

“I know, Mama,” Justine said. “Maybe later.”

She thought Lula was about to go back inside and leave her be, but then she stepped down into the garage. Lula scanned the boxes and garbage bags and then peered into the box Justine had been working in before moving to an untied kitchen trash bag.

Using her index finger, she shifted the trash bag open and pulled out a little Indian doll. The braided hair had come undone and matted. The faux buckskin dress came apart at the touch, and the nose had been chewed away to white plastic. The most intact thing about it was the bold lettering spelling China on the doll’s underparts.

“Mama, that thing’s been in a box for twenty years. Mice got to it.”

“Well, I’d appreciate you not throwing away my belongings,” Lula said. She carried the doll back into her bedroom.

Justine was so relieved at not being accused of stealing what she wanted before Lula died that she ignored the urge to barge through the now closed door and argue. Instead, she dug the album out again and flipped back to the picture of Reney and Granny.

It struck her that unless Granny was caught in a moment with one of her half sisters, she rarely smiled in photos. Even in this picture with Reney, who Justine knew was one of Granny’s secret favorites, her lips turned downward in a soft C.

The Granny of the photograph—old Granny—was a gentle woman who tucked her laughter into all of the places in their house that lacked. But “old Granny” had been far from a pushover. When it had gone bad with Lula, Granny acted as Justine’s and her sisters’ buffer.

Justine turned the page to a faded picture of Uncle Thorpe and his gang of kids—her cousins. The boys wore long pants and long sleeves and crew cuts. The girls were in long cotton dresses and pigtails. Most of them were barefoot— they’d probably been playing outside before whoever had the camera rounded them up and told them to freeze. She wiped a smudge over John Joseph, the cousin who’d been closest to her in age and her best friend. She smiled at the thought of the two of them fighting over who got to memorize “Jesus wept” for Sunday school.

In the picture, John Joseph stood off to the side a little, caught midstruggle, leaning back trying to hold a full-grown German shepherd. His hands hardly met around the dog’s barrel chest, and the dog’s outstretched legs were planted firmly on the ground. The movement must have caused John Joseph to be out of focus. There weren’t a lot of pictures of him, and this one was out here, ruining in the garage.

Justine shook her head and stood up to rub her back as she scanned the garage. She set the album back into Reney’s box before moving to another corner. There was no telling what had been lost.

She knelt before a new box and pulled out another picture of her granny. She was young in this one, her hair still black, her skin dark brown. She stood in a wooden wagon full of watermelons with Justine’s grandfather, a severe-looking white man in a cowboy hat and rolled-up blue jeans.

Justine squinted into the photograph, trying to imagine her grandmother so young. She had been a maid in a big ranch house when she’d met Justine’s grandfather, a barn hand who Justine knew had been a terrible drinker. It wasn’t hard to imagine Granny’s strength. She was kind, but she was not soft. That’s where Lula got it, where Justine got it, and Reney, too, Justine figured, though she’d done her damnedest to keep Reney from ever having to access that kind of strength. Granny had been brought up in Indian orphanages and, later, Indian boarding schools. She’d never taught her grandchildren the language beyond basic greetings. She simply said that life was harder for those who spoke it.

Justine thought of all the times she’d bought herself or Reney language tapes and materials at the Cherokee Nation gift shop. You could probably start a library if you gathered up the books, flash cards, and tape sets that she’d purchased over the years, only to stash them on a bookshelf until they made their way to boxes in the heat of her own garage.

This time, she didn’t even peek over her shoulder as she slid the photo inside the album in the box of thieved treasures. She took out a manila envelope with folded pieces of paper inside. From it, she pulled one of Lula’s charcoal teepee drawings. She marveled over her mother’s talent. No matter how many sets of pastels or pencils Justine sent her, Lula would not—said she could not—draw any longer.

Justine put the teepee in Reney’s box, too, and set the manila envelope to the side. In the bottom of the Dreft box was a leather journal, stiff with age. She thought it was one of Lula’s diaries, which Justine always felt bad about reading, though she could never help herself. Filled with Lula’s perfect cursive, the diaries spoke of deep loneliness and sorrows. It was a side of Lula that she didn’t reveal to anyone, as far as Justine could tell. Justine checked the door and opened the book. She nearly gasped when she saw the writing inside. She hadn’t seen her grandmother’s sweet scribbly handwriting in years. It looked like Granny had used the book as a record of their days, no matter how mundane.

May 25—In Hominy with Celia all week. Caught perch and catfish—big mess. Celia’s baby son graduated high school today.

May 30—Sweet Service tonight. Bro. Buzzard came and preached good.

June 2—Sister Irene picked us up for church but had to leave early for a sick little one.
Thorpe gave us a ride home.

June 3—Lula made a cowgirl cake for Reney’s birthday, so pretty. Reney is always sweet and precious. She stayed all night here again.

At that entry, Justine set the book down and cried so hard she had to pinch the top of her nose to keep quiet. After Reney divorced, she’d started calling Granny her soul mate. She said Granny came to her in dreams and had ever since they’d moved to Texas when she was a little girl. In taking Reney to Texas, Justine knew she’d taken her away from Granny, who, it turned out, had been Reney’s buffer too.

Reney had tried her best to follow in Justine’s footsteps in her sorry choice of men, and the more Justine pushed her to do better, the more Reney dug in. Until she let go and drove off without a word.

“Are you ready to go to McDonald’s?” Lula stuck her head out the door, surprising Justine again.

Justine jerked her shirt over her eyes and pinched them dry.

“Teeny?”

“McDonald’s is disgusting,” Justine said. “You need to take better care of yourself.”

Lula leaned heavily on the doorway to ease down into the garage. “Is everything okay?” she asked.

“Mother,” Justine nearly shouted. She took a breath then continued: “I’m fine.”

Her mother cupped Justine’s cheeks, as if Justine were a little girl and Lula were checking her face for cake icing. Justine wouldn’t meet her eyes. Instead, she studied the piece of paper, still stuck to Lula’s face. Lula must have fallen asleep studying her Bible and drooled.

“Mama loves you, Justine,” Lula said. “But only Jesus can make it all better.” She turned to go but came back and said, “Please don’t throw away my belongings.” Then she passed through the open garage door and climbed into the dented-up Pontiac.

“Where’d you get those keys?” Justine asked.

“I can rummage through my belongings too,” Lula said. Then she settled into the driver’s seat and started down the hill.

Justine picked up the box she’d been filling with treasures and sat with it in front of the fan. She pulled the rest of Lula’s artwork from the manila envelope. There was a smaller envelope inside, too, labeled “Teeny” in Lula’s looping letters. It was her High School Equivalency Certificate, lost nearly as soon as she’d gotten it all those years ago after Reney was born. She’d always been embarrassed to say she had only a GED, but right now, she felt proud of the yellowed piece of paper, saved all these years by Lula. She remembered what it meant when she got it. She was sixteen, but she could get a good factory job, a job with benefits. She could take care of Reney. She could help Granny and Lula.

She wiped the sweat from her face and pushed her hair behind her ears. Then she spread her GED on the floor before her, smoothing its creases. She placed a rock on top to keep it from blowing away. She added her grandmother’s journal and Lula’s drawings, all of them she could find. She placed the old pictures around everything, too, finding stones and knickknacks to place on each one. A pressed cardinal feather fell from an album. Justine sat there for some time, smoothing the feather between her fingers, letting the wind blow heat over her and her makeshift altar.

She looked back toward the road, where dust from Lula’s car was still settling. Justine knew she should have taken her mother to McDonald’s, where Lula was certain the pimple- faced kids saw her as royalty and not as the strange woman in a long dress who over-enunciated her order and huddled over her flapjacks. Now it was too late. But maybe tomorrow.

The Words That Will Bring Us Through the Chaos

I read Octavia E. Butler’s short story collection Bloodchild and Other Stories in the last year of my father’s life. He was in treatment for Stage IV colorectal cancer in Loma Linda, California—our home country of Malawi had only two oncologists at the time of his diagnosis in December 2016—and so I did a lot of reading on what effectively became my regular commute between Philadelphia, where I have lived for the last nine years, and Los Angeles, the nearest major airport to Loma Linda. The book was recommended to me by a friend from college when I’d gone to visit her in Michigan for her dissertation defense party, and I read the collection slowly over many flights to visit my father while he was in treatment, trips that became so frequent I quietly dubbed the route The Cancer Commute. 

The story that stuck with me the most, “Speech Sounds,” is set in a post-apocalyptic Los Angeles; the main character, Rye, has spent the last three years just surviving, but not much more than that. She lives alone, having lost her husband and three children to a disease that killed most of the population and left survivors either unable to speak or unable to read. Rye can still speak, and so she has lost her ability to read—but speaking is worse than useless, as she has no one else to talk to, and has learned over three years in the now-wasteland of Los Angeles that displaying her ability to speak would invite violently jealous aggression from others who could not. 

The Los Angeles of “Speech Sounds,” then, is in a near-total breakdown. When my family first moved back to our home country of Malawi from Canada after its troubled transition to democracy in 1994, there was a similar thread of breakdown that seemed to weave itself through everything. My new school had signs on the backs of its classroom doors with instructions for both fires and riots, and my new friends talked often about the violent unrest of the year before, when they’d had to hide in the school library as gunshots rang out in the neighborhood outside the school gates on a particularly violent day. Not wanting to appear soft in a new environment—in Canada the most unsettling thing to happen to anyone I’d known was a classmate having his bike stolen once—I stayed quiet through all of their recollections, and then asked my father some weeks later about what had happened before we’d returned to Malawi. 

My father’s assigned driver was rumored to have been a member of the former government’s paramilitary wing. After my father and two of my uncles were hijacked at gunpoint one night on their way home from a business trip, my father hired a bodyguard, too. They had been fortunate to survive their ordeal; three months later one of the guidance counselors at my school and her husband were also hijacked, but did not make it. My siblings and I never left the house after sunset: one of the few times I remember ever being allowed to go out at night in my adolescence was when I went to a school dance with a friend whose father owned the country’s best-known private security firm, and was personally in the car both to and from the school grounds. And if Dad had to drive by himself at night he always carried his gun with him. Thankfully he only had to use it once. 


Although I kept coming back to “Speech Sounds,” I really didn’t care for the main character, Rye. I think I found it annoying, grating even, that her existential baseline was so barely above survival, and that she seemed so hardened and cold, even if that orientation was understandable in the story’s context. In my own life while Dad was sick, though I often felt like I was barely going through the motions, I also tried to lean into joy when I could, whereas it seemed like Rye was almost allergic to it—assiduously protecting her solitude, insistently shirking the help of a man who could see she was in danger on the Washington Boulevard bus she’d attempted to board, until the looming threat of assault meant she had no choice but to allow him to protect her. 

Contrary to Rye, in that particular time of our family’s breakdown, I swung more energetically at life than I had before. I was in two friends’ weddings, as maid of honor in one and as the officiant of the other; I traveled for work events, I went to friends’ birthday dinners, I met colleagues for happy hours. It didn’t seem right that cancer, having already appropriated my father’s body and stolen our family’s future together, should also be able to obliterate the life I had spent years building into a castle of love and personal pride. And as clichéd as it sounds I look back on that time as a period of a life particularly well-lived, perhaps to the point of exhaustion or even past it, but with a determination I consider in retrospect to be admirable—no matter the disease’s chosen course, cancer would be insistently kept outside of the gates, unable to destroy the order I had so painstakingly constructed within. 


When states began instituting their formal stay-at-home orders in March, I found myself feeling concerned at how unconcerned I was. Not about COVID-19—it scared me then and scares me now. It was that folks around me seemed to be extraordinarily anxious about being in isolation, and I was not; I adapted immediately to it, with such ease that I realized this wasn’t quite new to me. With my parents being so protective of us in Malawi, my siblings and I were acculturated early to making our home our fortress; more recently, the final month of my father’s life in Loma Linda, October 2018, had effectively been its own quarantine, with our activities confined to our apartment building, the grocery store, and the hospital. 

My recollection of the importance of structure in chaos is what made going into isolation as easy as it was for me.

After nearly two years of building a life in Loma Linda around Dad’s illness, we had developed routines and structure that shepherded us through that time of cataclysm. My recollection of the importance of structure in chaos is what made going into isolation as easy as it was for me. I knew that routine was the difference between being able to get up and being emotionally flattened by the fearsome surrounding reality, and I quickly made an infinitely-habitable fortress of my Philadelphia apartment, which felt, at least in imagination, like it was keeping the danger outside at bay. I got up at the same time every day, showered and changed and brushed my teeth, ate the same food I always ate at the same time I always did, cleaned and laundered as I normally would have. I went shopping once a week at the local Giant Heirloom Market, and twice a month at the further away but still walkable Trader Joe’s; I went for daily walks, first in the evenings, then in the mornings as the weather became warmer. I took on volunteer work distributing lunch in my neighborhood with a Philly-area nonprofit, Mighty Writers, that teaches writing to pre-school through 12th grade students from underserved communities, and later accepted a teaching commission from them, to teach a virtual class on news literacy in the COVID-19 era. Even though I knew the disease was rattling at all of our gates, I really felt as though insistent routine would keep those gates firmly locked.

So when the protests against the killing of George Floyd began, I was oblivious in my apartment fortress to the violent unrest that rapidly followed; it was only when the curfew alert flashed across my phone screen that I realized that things must have become a lot more serious in Philly than I’d imagined. “Something must have popped off,” I murmured out loud, entirely to myself in my small one-bedroom apartment. And it very much had—a Google search revealed overturned police cruisers, smashed store fronts, burning cars, and violent clashes between cops and protesters. That night loud explosions were heard all over the city; the news the next day claimed that a cluster of ATMs had been blown up in a series of cash thefts, but the explosions have continued every night since, and those of us who live in the city think it must be something else.

Rye, too, kept assiduous order in her life, which is perhaps what took her so long to accept the help of the stranger just outside the Washington Boulevard bus. She has her routines—the house she stays in, the fresh food she grows, the canned food she forages for and stores. Her routines in her solitude are what have kept her alive, and she didn’t want to now have to think about potentially adding someone else into that mix. But the stranger—whom she privately calls Obsidian for the smooth black rock he shows her in lieu of a spoken name—is kind, and she realizes that she can either choose the risk of trusting him or the certainty of being assaulted by the other former bus passengers. For me, it wasn’t strangers I struggled to let in, but friends. During the lockdown, friends with cars offered to bring me groceries and I declined. When the city began to fall apart at the beginning of the protests and riots, two friends who lived outside the city separately called me to offer their places as temporary refuge, but I declined those offers, too. I would feel more disoriented at someone else’s house, even if far away from the chaos, than I then did in my apartment, and I needed the feeling of security more than I needed the actual certainty that I was far away from looming destruction. 

The hardness is her attempt to protect herself in a world where everything that used to protect her is gone.

In the first few months after Dad’s death I was like this too. Then, it wasn’t as much about needing to protect an established order; it was about protecting what little order I had left in my life since he’d left my life. I committed what little energy I had left after the whirlwind of the previous two years toward that project. I turned down all but the most meaningful invitations: I went to my friend Alex’s Passover Seder, but not drinks with an acquaintance who was briefly passing through the city; I went to my friend Jules’s wedding, but not for Saturday movie night at Josh and Lynn’s. I showed up at work, but barely did any, staring blankly at my screen for much of the day and taking walks often, occasionally going to cry in the tree-lined walkway around the corner from the office building. Keeping oriented and forward-facing was my full-time work back then; everything else felt like noise, like the fight that broke out on the Washington Boulevard bus that first brought Obsidian into Rye’s life. If Rye seemed cold at first encountering her in “Speech Sounds,” I finally came to understand that she was not so much cold as she was desperate not to fall apart; the coldness is merely her riot shield, the hardness is her attempt to protect herself in a world where everything that used to protect her is gone, as the person who most protected me in the world now was, too. 


The language of “Speech Sounds” is notably desolate and spare, skirting atop the surface of the action, saying only the most necessary words to convey meaning. But one gets the sense that even if she were able to safely speak in a way that others could understand, Rye still wouldn’t have the words for her particular grief: at her entire family lost, at her former self destroyed by the illness, at the world around her having disintegrated into a worst case scenario version of itself. Perhaps, in ceasing to speak, she is recreating the safety and security that was ripped from her when the virus first took hold three years before. Her silence protects her, in other words, and my memory of that final year with Dad—especially the last six months—feels similarly protectively silent.

By then, Dad’s exhaustion had begun to steal his mind from him. We could no longer talk the way we used to, long into the night, over a bowl of fresh fruit in the living room while watching an Al Jazeera documentary special, or in the kitchen over a cup of tea. He would instead sleep nearly all day, and when he wasn’t asleep he said very little, his sentences more and more clipped, his focus disappearing mid-thought. I found myself having to slow down my speech, make my voice slightly louder, sometimes explaining things multiple times, all of which felt searingly painful. My father had four degrees—five if you counted his intermediary masters on the way to gaining his Ph.D.—and part of the closeness in our relationship, complex as it was, had been the constant feeling of playing catch-up to the speed of his mind. It wasn’t so much that I was dismayed at having caught up to him—it was that he had started to leave the race, but not of his own will.

I learned to stop trying so hard to speak in a way that he could easily comprehend, and to just be glad to be silently in his company.

Cancer, between the disease itself and exhaustion of the treatment regimen, was effectively shorting out his body and his mind. By June of 2018—four months before he died—I learned to stop trying so hard to speak in a way that he could easily comprehend, and to just be glad to be silently in his company, whether he was awake or asleep. I’d queue up the various afternoon Judge shows he and my mother had come to enjoy hate-watching—“these people have nothing better to do than cause trouble for themselves?” he used to say on the increasingly rare occasions that he was awake at that time—and would have them on in the background while he slept. Occasionally I would also cook while watching those shows, either the lunch he’d missed while napping or else early dinner preparation; it was something I began to do a lot more in my final visits in those final months. Perhaps cooking for him was a way of telling him I loved him without me having to speak the words. Nonetheless I began to miss my father a long time before his body decided it had finally had enough, on the final Monday in October, just as the day’s last rays disappeared over the nearby San Bernardino mountains.


Whenever I was back home visiting my parents in Malawi, Dad always seemed to be several steps ahead of the latest threatened boit of chaos. Not just through his job and connections, but also because of his sharp instincts about the directions that any imminent winds of chaos might bend in. Whenever he spoke of approaching trouble—electricity and fuel shortages, a rash of violent robberies, death threats from the government after voicing his opinion too loudly again—he always made light of it, because he’d already assessed it and figured out what he was going to do with it by the time he vocalized his thoughts. The levity he applied to situations like that was not mere levity, but home policy: whatever was going on in the world outside our walls, it wouldn’t be allowed to destabilize us within them. I thus always understood danger in Malawi to be something that happened around us, but never directly to us. Now in this moment the U.S. I didn’t know whether to believe the danger was merely acting around me, or would soon be upon me. 

The atmosphere in Philadelphia was charged—charged with excitement, charged with anger, charged with nerves. What I did not expect, though, was to find my days charged with grief. I cried in the mornings, I cried listening to my favorite playlists, and had the class I teach on Tuesdays been a college class and not a class of teenagers with a Philadelphia non-profit, I would have canceled class that day, the first Tuesday after the protests began. I didn’t know where it was coming from. I am a Black woman in America, and to live in this body in this country is, on an existential level, to live inside an American-made cauldron of grief every day. I am used to that. And I was enraged at white America for it having had to take watching a man’s life be slowly choked out of him by the unrelenting knee of an agent of the law before they would believe that racial oppression in America didn’t end with the signing of the Civil Rights Act. But it wasn’t all of that that was making me cry. 

To live in this body in this country is, on an existential level, to live inside an American-made cauldron of grief every day.

Then I had a particularly vivid dream of my father, in the middle of that first week of nightly curfews and explosions. Nothing particularly special happened in the dream—he was going somewhere, and I was following him; he looked healthy, pre-cancer healthy, which I was happy about, as for a long time my dreams of him were only of him in his cancer-stricken body. He was happy in the dream, I remember that, and glad to see me, but we never made it to where we were going, because I woke up. And in that moment of waking, that drop of my heart when I realized he wasn’t really here, I simultaneously understood exactly why I was so wracked with grief as potent as those first weeks after he died—because for the first time since he died I felt palpably unsafe. I had to find out on my own the information my father would have once found out for me; attempt to rest assured in my own political threat analyses when I would have asked him for his; plan my own stockpiling, when he would have once just sent me a list without me even asking for it. In a time of real danger he wasn’t here to protect me against what might be coming.


For a brief moment in “Speech Sounds,” Rye begins to dream of a life for herself and Obsidian: “Now she did not have to go to Pasadena… Now she did not have to find out for certain whether she was as alone as she feared. Now she was not alone.” It was in these moments, with her guard down, that I liked her the most; every time I’ve re-read the story, especially in the early period after Dad died, I insistently liked her best in the parts where she admitted to herself that she didn’t want to tough life out by herself anymore. Maybe because it was what I needed to do for myself; even as I didn’t have much energy for people, I simultaneously secretly wished for my shell of grief to be not just embraced as so many friends did do, but to be shattered, to stop feeling as though I was walking in a universe parallel to the one everyone around me was in, everything that had held meaning to me suddenly feeling hollow, any language I had standing insufficient to the circumstance. 

But Rye’s reason to live turns out not to be Obsidian—he ends up being murdered, just moments after she had been fantasizing about their future together. Her reason to live turns out to be the two children of the unknown woman he was killed trying to protect—children Rye tries to leave behind at first, for fear of once again having hope snatched away from her just as quickly as it arrived. But she realizes she has to go back for them, as without an adult to protect them they would be unlikely to survive: “She would have to take the children home with her. She would not be able to live with any other decision.” In returning for the children—as well as the bodies of their mother and of Obsidian, so she can bury them in her backyard—Rye reconnects herself with core elements of her pre-illness world: caring for children, burying the dead. And it is critical that this moment occurs immediately after the moment where she nearly severs her connection to that same world, in considering leaving all four bodies, both living and dead, behind. Moving forward despite grief and loss is like that—eventually finding new things to care for, while simultaneously seeking to revive the parts of oneself thought to be lost to the immediate task of survival. The months immediately after Dad died were filled with such moments for me, too: fork-in-the-road moments in which I had to choose to lean into the life around me, or to reject it. I chose, in most cases, the actions that brought me back into the world of the living again, figuring my heart would catch up in time. Largely, it did.

As Rye begins to move the children’s mother toward her car, the dead woman’s daughter suddenly screams, “No!” In shock, Rye drops the body; she realizes the children can speak, and in that moment her blind faith that taking them home with her would be the only right thing to do crystalizes instantly into purpose. Importantly, though, her new understanding of her life’s meaning arrived after her decision to live. And perhaps my own instinctive understanding of how purpose in a life can often show up after the decision to just do something is what drove me to keep moving, too—whether trucking through my ongoing grief, or sorting through the chaos of this particular moment in history. Her reason for actively living, rather than merely surviving, arrived through Obsidian, but not directly from him; perhaps the hole that is left in us when someone we love leaves us is not a mortal wound, then, but a door. Rye doesn’t know if the children are immune to the disease or if it has simply run its course and any children born after its initial impact are unaffected. But she also doesn’t care—she simply wants to take care of them, to protect them and teach them what she knows. The last line of “Speech Sounds” is Rye telling the two kids she has taken home with her, “It’s okay for you to talk to me.” If we choose to walk through the door that loss creates, our lives might very well find new light.


In these protests it is not that people have finally spoken: most have been speaking for a long time, and some for their whole lives.

In the protests, the country heard the protesters’ grief. For a life forced brutally to its end by an agent of the state; for all the lives lost before whose worth had been so casually written off, the truths of their deaths overwritten. For all the lives still being lived, that have been silently consigned by the state to that same continuum of perceived worthlessness and ongoing historical disregard. I was too far away from any of the protests to be able to audibly hear them, yet they nonetheless felt loud, as booming as the explosion sounds displacing those early summer nights. But if the nighttime explosions rattled me, then the daytime protests rattled the country, and thus I was—even at my most scared—deeply glad. The images coming through my phone screen hour by hour felt apocalyptic (one of the students in my class later said he believed we were actually in the end times, living out the prophecy of the Book of Revelation) but a necessary apocalypse, an end to a world where a part of the population binds brutality with silence and the other part are commanded to comply. In these protests it is not that people have finally spoken: some of them have, certainly, but most have been speaking for a long time, and some for their whole lives. It is that this particular death—which happened in the eye of an unprecedented countrywide shutdown for which the entire country was brought to a standstill, and in that national silence was forced to finally see truth—shattered the comprehension barrier between speakers and their willfully unhearing audience. Finally, the audience heard the speakers; and finally, the audience began themselves to speak out, too. Thus grief brought comprehension, unsteady as it still feels, and even the possibility of hope, despite our remembrance of so many past hopes for real change shattered. Hope in the life of the nation we live in, hope in the newly-bound lives of the children and Rye.


At the end of the class that happened during the first week of the protests, one of my students asked me, “Do you think things are going to get better?” No, I wanted to say. It’s going to get a lot worse. Except I couldn’t; the average age in the class is 15, and as hopeless as I felt it felt wrong to bring them along in my hopelessness. They’re too young. Three of the students’ screens had the video cut; the other three stared at me expectantly, and I understood, staring back at them, that what I said in that moment mattered more than I’d ever meant it to when I had first accepted the class assignment six weeks prior. “It’s going to get complicated,” I said. “But with everything you have all told me in class I am really confident that you all are going to be a part of making it better, and together we will.” The student who had asked the question nodded a little and leaned back, and I took that to be as good a sign of approval as I would ever get.  And, in seeing their belief, I found myself—despite my own decided lack of hope—believing it too.

My father enjoyed the feeling of triumphing over chaos; to him, becoming derailed by unexpected circumstances wasn’t an acceptable human reality so much as it indicated a personal failure to appropriately adapt to one’s reality. But cancer was a chaos that none of us could triumph over despite our best routines and best battle strategies, and now I live in a world without him. Yet he is the one who taught me how to built fortresses amidst disorientation, how to pluck life’s solutions out of chaos; in those ways he never left, and in those ways he gave me the ability to turn on my own capacity for protection, and bring it to the students I have come to really care about. Rye will bury Obsidian and the toddlers’ mother in her backyard next to her husband and children, but as brief as his sojourn through her life was, he will not leave her either; thanks to his decision to protect her in the moment she badly needed it, she has now arrived in the children’s lives to do the same for them. He will always be there, guiding her protective hand. And though my father is now buried in the garden behind his parents’ house he will always be here too, gently pressing his own protective hand into the sunlight around my fortress, encouraging me to continue to speak. 

So You Want to Write in the Second Person

Welcome to Read Like a Writer, a series that examines a different element of the craft of fiction writing in each installment, using examples from the Recommended Reading archives. Each month, the editors of Recommended Reading—Halimah Marcus, Brandon Taylor, and Erin Bartnett—will select a few stories that illustrate a specific technique, style, or writing challenge such as how to write a story with only one character, use the first person plural “town” POV, or write an ending that is surprising yet inevitable.

The challenges to writing second person fiction do not apply only to second person fiction, which is to say that they have to do with persuading the reader to abandon their doubt. All of fiction involves overcoming the resistance readers have toward circumstances that conflict with their own sense of reality. The difference is, second person has to overcome this resistance hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of times as the story unfolds. In a fantasy story, we might have to accept, broadly, the premise that magic exists or that dragonfolk walk among us. But in a second person story, we have to accept, in a really minute way, that yes, you do lift your hand to your face to wipe sweat from your brow when you are not doing that at all. 

Second person fiction is confrontational. It forces the narrator and the reader into an alignment of opposition. In third person or first person, the reader is free to identify with the narrator at their own leisure, guided of course by the rhythms of the narration itself. Consider the way that Jane Austen coaxes us, in moments of great emotion, to identify with Anne Eliot in Persuasion, but when the moment passes, we ebb away from her and to a more aloof narrative distance. But in second person fiction, the reader is forced into identification with a character for the duration of the story. You are a young, West Indian woman being told how to wash in clothes in Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl.” You are a privileged white guy on a coke bender in Bright Lights, Big City. You are a witty adulteress in Lorrie Moore’s “How to Be an Other Woman.” There is no room to breathe in the second person. We do not flow in and around the character so much as hurtle along through the narrative space, the world of the story rising up to meet us like passing cars on the highway. What makes second person so challenging to write is that the author must overcome the reader’s response to this forced identification with the you of the story

But that identification is one of the great strengths of second person. The author can force the reader into a position of uncomfortable subjectivity or implication. Or the author can, with a few deft strokes, conjure the eerie, oblique angle between a person who has been traumatized and their sense of themself. Yes, second person is a POV that discomforts in part because it refuses to erase the artifice inherent in storytelling, but this artifice, when done successfully, gives the story a three-dimensional aspect. Second person stories can be playfully meta or crushingly profound. 

Below, you will find a sampling of second person stories from the Recommended Reading Archives, selected by the editors. —BT


How Does a Person Become a Nun? A Practical Guide by Blair Hurley

Blair Hurley demonstrates the formal play possible with second person in “How Does a Person Become a Nun?” The story’s structure is drawn from the set of steps one makes toward taking vows. The reader watches as Molly and her mother, who is an Easter/Christmas Catholic and a feminist, grapple with Molly’s apparent calling. 

As editor Erin Bartnett says in her introduction to the story: “Written entirely in the second person, ‘your mother’ is the one who cries, ‘Why do you have to punish yourself to be good?’ And ‘you’ are the one who wants ‘to explain to your mother that you have a sensual life too: you are seeking a greater intimacy with God.’ You, the reader, by way of Hurley’s lyrical prose, are lulled into identifying with Molly. But no, wait, of course, not youyou don’t want to be a nun, do you? The magic trick of this back-and-forth between recognition and alienation, is that you end up feeling, at the most intimate level, what it must be like to be Molly and also what it’s like to be her mother.” —BT

The Bird Is a System” by Gabrielle Hovendon

An easy way to piss off someone born in the early- to mid-1980s is to call them a millennial. The bounds of the generation are technically 1981 to 1996, but few people born before 1986 are willing to identify as such. This defensiveness is a compelling reason for “The Bird is a System” by Gabrielle Hovendon, a story about millennial malaise, to be written in second person. Every person who reads it—even, or especially, the millennials—will resist believing “you” applies to them. 

The narrator, a recent college graduate, is working at a down-and-out owl sanctuary while she contemplates her life goals, purpose, and romantic possibilities. Throughout the story, the narrator capitalizes phrases like “Thrive Under Pressure,” “Following a Nontraditional Path,” and “Building Character.” One has the impression that these phrases are not organic to her, they are inherited from parents and career counselors; people who have placed expectations on her that she has been unable to fulfill. People who started most of their sentences  with “you should” and “you have to.” Along with the second person, these phrases signify the distance between her life as it is happening, shoveling owl shit and flinging mouse carcasses, and her life as she expected it, which, she begins to realize, she never bothered to picture with any specificity. 

Hovendon also makes excellent use of the transportive properties of the second person, finding unexpected beauty in the owl sanctuary: “All around you, the evening insect sounds were beginning. Lightning bugs speckled the aviary.” As the narrator gives herself over to indecision, to the particular joys of being in medias res, so too does the reader give themselves over to the second person’s direct address. Maybe it isn’t so bad to be an aimless twentysomething, a life full of possibility ahead of you. —HM

Maroon” by Ladi Opaluwa

“Maroon” by Ladi Opaluwa is a story about sexual violence, an experience that defies narration. The narrator, a 19-year-old unnamed woman, is studying in her dorm room, listening to a thunderstorm outside, when she is interrupted by an uninvited visitor: “You did not hear Pastor James knock.” The sentence is simply and immediately terrifying. Every time I read it, I feel that knock in the bottom of my lungs. Pastor James, we come to learn, is the leader of the Spring Living fellowship that the narrator is also a part of. 

In this story, the second person POV is operating on complex registers. The second person creates a reflective but separate experience of the trauma for the narrator to relate, as one would describe the face in the mirror. You, but not you. But Ladi Opaluwa also deftly uses the second person to subvert the power dynamic, putting the narrator in control of the storytelling, and submerging the reader into the immediacy of being acted upon: “You knew where he was going but wanted to be sure, to wait and see, to be a spectator over yourself, a witness to your own calamity.” It makes the reader “a spectator over yourself” in a visceral way, and asks what it means to witness. —EB

The Most Anticipated Debuts of the Second Half of 2020

There’s no doubt COVID-19 has forever changed the world as we know it. A small slice of life that had to shift trajectory is the publishing industry.

Debut authors are especially struggling as the books they have worked on for countless years are released into a world without in-person book tours or physical bookstore browsing. Many indie bookstores have shifted to virtual programming to help authors promote their books and connect with readers. My own site Debutiful, where readers can discover new authors, interviewed an additional fifteen authors whose tours were canceled due to the pandemic.

These efforts from the literary community are one step to helping these newly published authors pursue their art. Another small and simple step readers can take to support debut writers is by pre-ordering their books. Luckily, the second half of 2020 has just as many amazing debuts as the first half. 

July 

Inheritors by Asako Serizawa

Inheritors by Asako Serizawa

Set between Japan and the U.S. across 150 years, O. Henry award-winner Asako Serizawa’s interconnected stories look at the reverberations of World War II from the eyes of the colonized and the colonizers. 

Crooked Hallelujah by Kelli Jo Ford

Kelli Jo Ford, the 2019 Plimpton Prize winner, weaves a story of four generations of women from the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Page after page, she offers devastating plot and astonishing language. 

The Bright Lands by John Fram

A friend recently pointed out that I only seem to gush about queer stories set in a rural location. That’s exactly what Fram’s debut novel is. He expertly crafts a slice of new Americana about queer life in a small town where secrets and anxieties come to a head in a way that changes the community forever.

The Heart and Other Monsters by Rose Andersen

After her younger sister died of a heroin overdose in 2013, Andersen began exploring their shared past. It starts narrow in scope—a portrait of a dysfunctional family—and expands to tackle the opioid crisis in our country.  

August 

Luster

Luster by Raven Leilani

Sometimes there’s a book that everyone in the publishing world is talking about. Luster is that book. Leilani’s novel is about a young Black woman, struggling to make it as an artist, who finds herself in the middle of a white couple’s open marriage. 

Tomboyland by Melissa Faliveno

In this essay collection about identity, class, sex, and gender, you’ll find deeply personal revelations that anyone can connect with. Each essay offers a unique perspective on topics we’ve all thought about, whether we’re a tomboy from the suburbs, a straight mountain man, or anything in between. Because there is no binary. 

The All-Night Sun by Diane Zinna

The All-Night Sun by Diane Zinna

In The All-Night Sun, a lonely college teacher, Lauren, finds herself in an intense friendship with a new charismatic student, Siri, in her class. Lauren follows Siri on a trip back to her home in Sweden, only for their friendship to unravel, culminating in an explosive Midsummer.  

Born to be Public by Greg Mania

Greg Mania is one of the funniest up-and-coming writers cranking out work and he is finally releasing his laugh-out-loud memoir. He’s won script writing competitions, interviewed authors and celebrities (most notably Kathy Griffin). Come for the laughs, stay for the heartwarming story of coming out in the most millennial way possible. 

This House is a Body by Shruti Swamy

O. Henry award-winner Shruti Swamy blurs reality over the course of a dozen stories set in America and India. Swamy has a knack for creating captivating stories filled with unforgettable characters, but what makes this collection truly mesmerizing is her ability to play with structure and reinvent herself story to story.

Winter Counts by David Heska Wanbli Weiden

In Winter Counts, Virgil Wounded Horse serves as an enforcer-for-hire on the Rosebud Indian Reservation in South Dakota who gets tangled up with drug dealers based out of Denver. This gritty thriller is filled with the twists and turns expected from a crime novel, but Weiden also offers deeper insight into racial identity and the violence that Native Americans face on a regular basis.

September

Bestiary by K-Ming Chang

Bestiary by K-Ming Chang

A tiger spirit haunts generations of a Tawainese family in Chang’s mythical debut. A tale of queer desire and family secrets, Bestiary is a kaleidoscopic tale of the women in this family as the youngest eventually finds herself in America decades later.

These Violent Delights by Micah Nemerever

This campus novel set in 1970s Pittsburgh—about two college students whose codependent friendship is tinged with cruelty—is far from quiet. Pitched as a “taut Hitchcockian story,” readers who need some thrill in their life will find this page-turner very binge-able. Micah Nemerever showcases a lot of skills on the pages, but it is the intricate plotting that propels this novel forward.

Fifty Words for Rain by Asha Lemmie

Fifty Words for Rain by Asha Lemmie

The story is about an outsider seeking belonging in post-World War II Japan. Nori is the daughter of a black GI and a Japanese aristocrat, raised in isolation by her grandparents who are ashamed of her dark skin. When her older half-brother arrives to claim his inheritance, Nori finds herself questioning her sequestered life and wondering if she can be truly accepted by society.

Dancing With the Octopus by Debora Harding

When she was 14, Debora Harding was kidnapped and left for dead. Against all odds, she survived but the trauma never left her. As an adult, she decides to meet her incarcerated kidnapper to understand his history and motivations. A gripping memoir, Dancing With the Octopus is both a heartbreaking reconstruction of a crime and a powerful account of healing from trauma. 

Each of Us is Killers by Jenny Bhatt

The stories in Jenny Bhatt’s debut collection explore characters in Midwest America, India, and England as they seek to fulfill their hopes and dreams. Bhatt places her characters in the cracks of society and doesn’t give them a clear cut identity. This ambiguity is the driving force in most of her stories, questioning the societal expectations forced upon BIPOC individuals.

Un-American by Hafizah Geter

The poems in this debut collection are both lyrical and narrative. Nigerian American poet Hafizah Geter writes about confronting racism and trying to fit into a country that doesn’t seem to want her. Geter also delves into queerness, loss, and migration over the course of nearly three dozen poems.

October

At Night All Blood Is Black by David Diop, translated by Anna Moschovakis

French Senegalese author David Diop’s English language debut was selected by students in France to win the Prix Goncourt des Lyceens Award. At Night All Blood Is Black tells the story of a Senegalese man who finds himself confronting the horrors of the trenches when he is drafted in the French army during World War I. Diop’s novel offers profound insight into the overlooked history of Senegalese soldiers who fought in the French army during the war. 

November

The Orchard by David Hopen

A devout Jewish student comes of age in David Hopen’s debut about a teenager who moves from ultra-orthodox Brooklyn to a fancy Miami suburb. As Ari Eden enrolls in a wealthy Jewish academy and enters the secular world, he experiences culture shock and begins testing the boundaries of his religious beliefs.

Eartheater by Dolores Reyes, translated by Julia Sanches

The award for best elevator pitch goes to this novel: an Argentinian woman is drawn to eating earth and when she does, she gets visions of missing and murdered people. It becomes part magical realist murder-mystery but more importantly, it’s an exploration of the people who are left behind and forgotten by society.

Nights When Nothing Happened

Nights When Nothing Happened by Simon Han

Simon Han’s debut novel follows a Chinese family living in Texas who seem to be living their American Dream. But that illusion quickly unravels when their young daughter begins sleepwalking, setting off a series of unexpected events and bringing low-buried secrets to the surface.

Is Technology Your Friend or Your Enemy?

Tracy O’Neill’s new novel, Quotients, is the global story of Alexandra Chen and Jeremy Jordan: their growing love, their sealed pasts, their connections to vast intelligence agencies, their hopes to feel whole while still withholding. They marry, move, change careers, adopt. They try not to lie, so they mislead. Of the novel’s background, of the shifting, insidious space behind, and often between, Jeremy and Alexandra—well, this is the world. History. Reality. The world of the 7/7 London Bombings, of call centers and hedge funds and catfishing and social media obsessions, of The Troubles, Operation Banner, the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment. The tension within this landscape produces an accomplished work of art with encyclopedic reach and poetic concision. 

Quotients by Tracy O'Neill

On the page, O’Neill is a constructer of both bright high-rises and pulse-deep perceptions. She makes connections between continents of information. She unpacks the words that form a name. A lemon is “a great yellow orb.” Family advice is “legacy wisdom.” The application process for an adoption: “To become a family, their hands filled blanks.” A couple lies to avoid “becoming quotients.” On the phone, I found O’Neill—a National Book Foundation 5 Under 35 honoree—to be just as insightful as her narrator. We talked about some of the book’s themes, such as the value of privacy, the construction of the self, the misleading comfort in numbers. 

The book’s cover—a lined landscape of slightly tilted geometry—has the same dramatic ambiguity as its title: “quotients,” a word from the language of mathematics, a referential language, a system of clamped meanings—yet, as word alone, “quotients” takes on a dislocated longing, a lyrical grief.


Alexander Sammartino: There’s a scene late in Quotients when two characters are talking about posting on the novel’s social media platform, the cleverly named Cathexis. One character asks: “What’s the worst that could happen if strangers knew the happiest part of your life?” And his friend responds: “Anything you say can and will be held against you.”

I thought we could start the interview here, with a discussion on the value of privacy, since this feels like a central tension in the book—that is, the characters in Quotients often seem to be either struggling to obtain privacy, or, having obtained it, are struggling with the consequences of privacy. Privacy also feels like the ultimate existential struggle in the information age: what meaning, if any, can be found in the unseen life. 

So I want to begin by asking, do you believe there is something sacred in privacy? And, if so, what specifically do you think is important about privacy to the characters in Quotients

Tracy O’Neill: We have the obvious problem of surveillance capitalism. But I think privacy is also important to being able to experiment with thought and affect, to play with and consider ideas that perhaps are not going to be your permanent position on a particular subject, and grow from discussing and processing them, as in—-just for one example—therapy. So this is not just about public life but also in our personal lives. The characters in Quotients—many are trying to find a stronger sense of self or stronger relationships. And I think that feeling safe to take risks in both regards matters. 

In the Information Age, information that we give is used often not in the way that we intend, whether that is to sell us things, on mortgage decisions, or to track and discipline political speech. Think about how facial recognition technology—built with images from platforms like Flickr where users wanted to simply share moments of their personal lives—has been used to identify protesters. We are in a terrible position right now where online spaces that we use for communication and expression are weaponized against free speech. 

When we look at this current moment—people, say, having Zoom events, or kids using video conferencing for school—we don’t yet know what some of that data will be used for. Then the question becomes: how do we feel safe to cultivate our identities, express ourselves freely, or risk connection in online spheres where information may be used for something other than what we wish it to be? Some of the characters in this book want to push back against violence in their lives, but they don’t know if they can safely.

AS: I love this distinction between surveillance capitalism and a notion of self, and I think both are explored in Quotients: you’re able to show these external consequences related to privacy, but also for the characters what’s at stake personally, emotionally, spiritually. And I think there’s this interesting tension there, because in our most private moments—that’s when we’re able to commit acts of great dishonesty. That’s true of the relationship at the heart of the novel, with Jeremy and Alexandra. I’m wondering if you can say a little more about that—about how, in our private moments, when we are capable of defining ourselves, we are able to most betray those we love. 

TO: That tension is so central to the book. Early on, a lot of the cautiousness in Alexandra’s character has to do with her sense of always being perceived: there’s a way in which she’s anticipating a gaze on her. And that makes her even more secretive. There are a couple of moments in the narrative where she’s sort of testing the boundary to see how Jeremy would perceive something that she is considering saying or considering talking about, and he tends to fail these little tests because he is also performing this role in which he is not somebody who has a rather large secret about his own past in intelligence work. 

In this book, it’s not that I wanted to suggest that privacy is unimpeachably the most important value, but, rather, that privacy is valuable specifically because it may afford openness in certain ways that the characters tend not to take. I don’t know if that answers your question.

AS: It totally does. 

I also thought it was brilliant to have the narrative time be Jeremy and Alexandra’s relationship, how they’re our point of access to these bigger organizations. Can you talk a bit about that decision? 

We are in a terrible position right now where online spaces that we use for communication and expression are weaponized against free speech.

TO: I have asked myself a lot of questions about what the novel is supposed to do as a form, generally. What makes the novel matter. What effects are supposed to occur in the reader. And although I suspect that we have undervalued certain things that the novel can do—like presenting a political rhetoric, or ideas—I acknowledge that most people are probably reading with the sense that fiction’s primary recommendation is its ability to confer emotion, or the feeling of feeling. 

I wanted to use this relationship in order to accomplish that function and simultaneously be working in these other modes which are often associated with other forms of discourse or text, like journalism or scholarship. I was thinking about their difficulties in forming a loving, safe family as synecdochic for our difficulties in forming a society of love and safety.

AS: Your novel reminded me about something that is so inherently special to the form, something the novel can do far better than film, which is the ability to show the consequences of time passing. I think this is partly a result of you choosing to foreground Jeremy and Alexandra’s relationship, how we see this couple age together, the consequences that come with age. 

What’s also interesting about this relationship is that both people, within their respective communities, are outsiders: Alexandra is an Asian American woman in London; Jeremy is, well, because of his secrets, his history in intelligence work, he also remains an outsider. I was wondering what connections you saw in their histories? That is, what made you conceive of this relationship, between these two people, with these sets of properties?

TO: Both of these characters are very aware of surfaces. The way in which people perceive them is both different from who they are and a part of how they negotiate their identities. So I think one of the ways in which they’re similar—and maybe they don’t even entirely sense this about each other—is that they’re always trying to represent themselves to others in a way that will ferry them toward love, security, happiness. At the same time, their relationship fails at moments they’re secretive with each other. If they were to sort of pull back the scrim, they might find each other to be more empathetic than they anticipate.

AS: To shift a bit here, I want to ask about the 7/7 London bombings, which, in the timeline in the novel, happen early on. What drew you to that specific event for Quotients?

TO: I was interested in writing about a terrorist event that was not on American soil, because it was important to me that this was a book that had a global plot. I wanted to get at the way in which the moment that we live in is not only an information age but also an age of globalization. 

The 7/7 Attacks were not centered around a single location, like in the way that we conceive of 9/11 being centered around the Twin Towers. They were suited to portraying that sense of being surrounded by terror, the sense the characters have that when a terrible thing happens, it doesn’t mean another terrible thing isn’t going to happen.

AS: So I also want to ask about The Troubles. At one point Wright, a former spy, says: “Everywhere is Belfast with a different flag.” What brought you to The Troubles?

TO: I wanted to step away from conceiving of terrorism as grounded in jihadi extremism, which I think we’ve too often tended to do, at least in the United States. It was important to me that in The Troubles there is some moral ambiguity tied to the use of terrorism for the purpose of Northern Irish independence. In this book, I was really trying to critique some of the ways in which our attraction to and reliance on data, categorization, and quantification often elides a more complicated picture. So I was interested in the Troubles because there is not a completely neat overlap between the Protestant-Catholic divide and the divide over self-determination. You also have people fighting each other who look like each other, and that you can’t see the ideological difference—was almost an oblique tie to how the identities of people online are made anonymous.

There’s also that the Good Friday Agreement was only a couple of years after the internet became commercially available. It could be said to coincide with the transition into the Information Age. 

AS: I want to talk about two sentences that I love. 

Here’s one, which comes from a scene when Jeremy, at a bar in New York, is watching the bartender cut a lemon: “Jeremy watched the man scalp an arc of skin off a great yellow orb.” 

Also, from the prologue, when Jeremy is working in a call center: “Sound huddles waves into intimacy.”

Can you talk about these sentences, as well as about your relationship to language as a writer?

TO: I’m often thinking about sentences in a few ways. 

The first example you gave—“Jeremy watched a man scalp an arc of skin off a great yellow orb.”—is an example of a circumlocutionary technique. It is trying to get at the feeling of feeling, the textures of experience. In that sentence, yes, there is the physical description of what’s happening, but it’s also that we are seeing this moment through Jeremy’s consciousness. This is a man who has the stuff of war so deeply entrenched in his psyche that it becomes his reference point. Scalping. There’s a violence to it.

When information is extracted and then militarized or used for surveillance capitalism, we aren’t made safer.

That other sentence—“Sound huddles waves into intimacy.”—I want to build out this psychological and thematic substrate. It’s a scientific fact I gloss, but I’m trying to project a larger thematic note about what happens in the book and also get at the way Jeremy is thinking about intimacy. In this prologue, he’s involved in some magical thinking. He’s bargaining. He’s thinking if he’s a good enough guy, then nothing bad is going to happen to Alexandra. I hope the magical thinking is made slightly more emphatic by using that language of science as a counterpoint. 

Syntactically I am often trying to create a shift, a plot of sorts, so that a reader’s understanding of what is happening in the course of a sentence changes. I don’t want someone to read the first half of a sentence and anticipate the second half all the time. I’m using sound to drive the work forward rhythmically and also create certain groupings, senses of pattern and anomaly. That is particularly important in this work, which is about people trying to see patterns but finding their stories don’t fit into the schemas.

AS: I know we began the interview with this broader discussion of privacy, so to end I thought we might talk about our larger cultural obsession with knowledge and how that appears in Quotients. 

Of course in some sense numbers are symptoms of our yearning for omniscience, and I was thinking of how we see this in your characters. For example, Alexandra has an app that lets her track her mother’s purchases and general online activity. You write: “Now she could see where the money went, she could see what her mother wrote, and it mollified something to know she could know.”

So, lastly, I want to ask: what do you think is mollified in our ability to know? Both for these characters, and, maybe, more broadly, at this particular cultural moment?

TO: All of these characters are facing a world that feels very dangerous. Part of that danger is not knowing what is true or who to trust. They don’t know if they can trust online friends, their governments, their loved ones. 

Early in the book, Lyle and his friend Bri are bantering. They invoke Hannah Arendt: “If everybody always lies to you, the consequence is not that everyone believes the lies, it’s that no one believes anything any longer, and with such people you can then do what you please.” The characters in Quotients are facing the potential to be immobilized by misinformation and disinformation. How can you call out state violence when you don’t know what’s true? How can you know who to affiliate with, who your community or your family or friends are, online? How does that affect how you love? How can you speak freely if your signal boosting becomes data collected by police to then target protest? And how does that affect how you politically organize? 

One of the things the characters want mollified for them is a sense that their worlds can be trusted and that therefore they can exert agency in their lives. It comes down to this fundamental question about whether they can enjoy a level of self-determination, create bonds, invest in a better future. They want to lead lives that feel existentially worthwhile, but they confuse information and knowledge.

Throughout this book I wanted to trouble that distinction. I wanted to convey that when information is extracted and then militarized or used for surveillance capitalism, we aren’t made safer. We have to gamble love in our relationships, love in our communities and global politics without falling back on the myth that weaponized information will save us.

8 Anti-Capitalist Sci-Fi and Fantasy Novels

Karl Marx may be famous for his thorough, analytic attack on capitalism (see: all three volumes and the 1000-plus pages of Das Kapital), but let’s be real: it’s not the most exciting to read. What if, just as a thought experiment, our works that reimagined current structures of power also had robots?

Speculative fiction immerses the reader in an alternate universe, hooking us in with a stirring narrative and intricate world-building—or the good stories do, anyways. Along the way, it can also challenge us to take a good look at our own reality, and question with an imaginative, open mind: how can we strive to create social structures that are not focused on white, patriarchal, cisgendered, and capitalist systems of inequity? 

As poet Lucille Clifton says, “We cannot create what we can’t imagine.” Imagination is an integral element to envisioning concrete change, one that goes hand in hand with hope. Although certain magical elements like talking griffins and time travel might be out of reach (at least for the present moment), fantasy and sci-fi novels allow us to imagine worlds that we can aspire towards. Whether through a satire that exposes the ridiculousness of banking or a steampunk rewriting of the Congo’s history, the authors below have found ways to critically examine capitalism—and its alternatives—in speculative fiction. 

Everfair by Nisi Shawl

A speculative fantasy set in neo-Victorian times, Shawl’s highly-acclaimed novel imagines “Everfair,” a safe haven in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In Shawl’s version of the late 19th-century, the Fabian Socialists—a real-life British group—and African-American missionaries band together to purchase a region of the Congo from King Leopold II (whose statue was recently defaced and removed from Antwerp, as a part of the global protest against racism). This region, Everfair, is set aside for formerly enslaved people and refugees, who are fleeing from King Leopold II’s brutal, exploitative colonization of the Congo. The residents of Everfair band together to try and create an anti-colonial utopia. Told from a wide range of characters and backed up with meticulous research, Shawlcreates a kaleidoscopic, engrossing, and inclusive reimagination of what history could have been. “I had been confronted with the idea that steampunk valorized colonization and empire, and I really wanted to spit in its face for doing that,” Shawl states; through her rewritten history of the Congo, Shawl challenges systems of imperialism and capitalism. 

Parable of the Sower

Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler

Although written in 1993, Parable of the Sower’s vision of the 2020s rings bleakly true: renowned sci-fi writer Butler grounds her novel in a collapsing society, plagued by climate change, wealth inequality, and attacks on minorities. Her protagonist, Lauren Oya Olamina, grows up in a sheltered bubble near L.A., away from the demise of U.S. capitalism; Lauren also has “hyperempathy,” a condition that renders her both vulnerable and incredibly sensitive to others’ emotions. However, when her home is destroyed, Lauren must pursue a new vision for community. While Butler paints an acutely dark picture of capitalistic greed, she also offers a hope-filled alternative to dystopia, or ways to transform society beyond these destructive models. And if one book of this universe doesn’t sound like enough for you, Lauren’s journey continues in Butler’s sequel, Parable of the Talents.

Making Money by Terry Pratchett

If you stop to think about it, isn’t the concept of a credit card ridiculous? Pratchett’s characters would certainly agree. Pratchett’s Discworld series, as the Guardian noted, “started out as a very funny fantasy spoof [that] quickly became the finest satirical series running.” This installment follows con-man Moist von Lipwig (who first appeared in Pratchett’s spoof on the postal system, Going Postal), as he gets roped into the world of banking. The Discworld capital, Ankh-Morpork, is just being introduced to—you guessed it—paper money. However, citizens remain distrustful of the new system, opting for stamps as currency rather than use the Royal Mint. Cue the Financial Revolution, with Golem Trust miscommunications, a Chief Cashier that may be a vampire, and banking chaos. In his signature satirical style, Pratchett points out the absurdities of the modern financial system we take for granted. 

Dark Lord of Derkholm by Diana Wynne Jones

When Derk, a placid magician farmer, and his ragtag family (one sorceress wife, two human children, and five speaking griffins) are somehow put in charge of organizing the “Pilgrim Parties,” everything starts going awry. The Pilgrim Parties are a live-action tour where citizens from Earth can visit to fulfill their own fantasy adventure. However, these tours come at the cost of the agrarian land’s citizens, such as Derk’s family. After all, someone needs to act out the part of the Dark Lord, and transform their comfortable home into foreboding ruins. More seriously, peasants’ homes are routinely pillaged, and the land is suffering at the cost of providing entertainment. The only person benefiting from this exploitative system is an ordinary-looking businessman from Earth, Mr. Chesney, who is armed with economic savviness, malicious desire for profit—and a powerful demon. So, how to stop his reign of business terror? If you thought Jones’s books were just for children, think again. Dark Lord of Derkholm is a rollicking adventure filled with high fantasy and humor, but also examines the damaging effects of the tourism industry and capitalistic intent. 

Autonomous by Annalee Newitz

In Newitz’s vision of a technological future, pharmaceutical businesses dominate the world—after much of humanity has been decimated through plagues (yikes); here everything can be owned, patented, and/or programmed. Autonomous follows Jack Chen, a Robin Hood-like “pirate” who develops and distributes free drugs to help the public. When Jack accidentally delivers a lethal drug that makes people into workaholics, driving them to insanity or physical unsafety, she must try to find a reverse cure—and discovers a dangerous secret about the pharmaceutical industry along the way. Meanwhile, the companies send a robot and military agent to track Jack down. Newitz’s framework of work “productivity” as a deadly drug is one we can all afford to keep in mind, as our workplaces and gig economy culture become increasingly focused on production alone. Autonomous is a thoughtful exploration on the dangers of consumerism, as well as a nuanced exploration of AI (robot sexuality is another integral theme). 

Foundryside by Robert Jackson Bennett

Foundryside by Robert Jackson Bennett

In Foundryside’s city of Tevanne, magic, or “scriving,” has become industrialized and controlled by the Merchant Houses. The Merchant Houses have used scriving to encode everyday objects; as a result, Tevanne runs like a brutal, well-oiled machine. All this may change when Sancia, a young thief with an ability to sense scriving, is sent to steal an artifact of immense power. This artifact, responsible for generating the codes for the current system, is equally capable of revolutionizing and rewriting the world of Tevanne. (Not to bring in too much Marx here, but Bennett’s “artifact” really reminds me of the famous quote in The Communist Manifesto, where Marx and Engels proclaim that the tools for overthrowing the bourgeoisie will grow from the very system of capitalism itself.) Using magic as a framework, Foundryside—the first book in Bennett’s series—doesn’t shy away from examining the ethics of capitalism and the consequences of corporatization. 

The Dispossessed by Ursula Le Guin

If we are talking about speculative fiction and potential utopias, Ursula Le Guin cannot be left off of this list. In The Dispossessed’s universe, the planets of Anarres and Urras have been long divided by political rifts. Anarres is based in anarcho-syndicalism, an ideological system that prioritizes the worker and seeks to abolish the wage system. Urras, on the other hand, is split between two warring factions: a capitalist, patriarchal state and a closed-off, authoritarian government. Shevek, a physicist from Anarres, seeks to peacefully unite the Anarres and Urras, and end the centuries-old tradition of hate and mistrust. Reflecting on her work in 2017, Le Guin wrote of The Dispossessed, “I started by reading a whole mess of utopias and learning something about pacifism and Gandhi and nonviolent resistance. This led me to the nonviolent anarchist writers [with whom] I felt a great, immediate affinity … So, when I realised that nobody had yet written an anarchist utopia, I finally began to see what my book might be.” Although other anarchist utopias have been published after The Dispossessed’s publication 1974, Le Guin’s novel remains a classic sci-fi text. 

The Fifth Season by N. K. Jemisin

As we’ve seen above, “anti-capitalism” is usually directly associated with, well, political and economic structures. However, as Marxist postcolonial scholars have continuously noted, “capitalism” doesn’t exist in a vacuum from the other societal systems of oppression; racism is an inherent building block of capitalism. Jemisin’s much-acclaimed novel is, at its heart, an exploration of oppression. Set in “Stillness,” a bleak supercontinent that is regularly ravaged by climate catastrophe and caste systems dominate society, The Fifth Season focuses on three female “orogene” narrators. The orogenes are a caste that has the power to control the earth’s energies; the rest of the population depend on their powers to help subdue climate crises, while simultaneously exploiting them for their own benefit and treating them inhumanely—orogenes are subjected regularly to systematic murders. As the New York Times notes, “Systems of power stalk [Jemisin’s] protagonists, often embodied as gods and primeval forces … When escape comes in her novels, it is not a merely personal victory … Her heroes [are] smashing through oppressive systems and leaving them behind like shed skins.” Even within this dystopian landscape, Jemisin allows room for change, showing various ways to revolutionize and dismantle the system—whether that is an underground community or a utopian deserted island society. 

Everybody Ejaculates

If you read almost any pre-WWI novel, you’ll find liberal use of the word “ejaculated” in moments of intense dialogue. Prior to the early 1900s, authors often used it to denote an exclamation; in the words of the OED, to ejaculate can mean “to utter suddenly.” This literary supercut repurposes these sudden utterances from 35 novels including The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Anne of Green Gables, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, and Riders of the Purple Sage.

Climactic Literature: A Literary Supercut           

“Oh, Jem!” Jane ejaculated.

“Ah!” ejaculated Grace.

“Humph!” ejaculated Mrs. Thorne.

“Humph!” ejaculated Chet’s mother.

“Dolly!” ejaculated Mrs. Boncassen. “She’s a woman, through and through, if ever thar was one.”

“She is,” ejaculated Keith, looking meditatively at the stove.

“Very glad, very glad!” she ejaculated.

“Good lord!” ejaculated the old man, sitting down feebly and staring.

“Brian!” ejaculated the banker. (The clerk ejaculated the length of his toothpick.)

“Me?” ejaculated the Society Editor, disdainfully.

“As sure as I’m in this room!” he ejaculated.

“But—me!” ejaculated Victor, rolling his eyes upwards in astonishment.

“Confusion!” ejaculated Piers.

“It was a confession,” I ejaculated.

“Heaven give me patience!” ejaculated Penrose.

“Never!” ejaculated Hippy fervently.

“Never!” ejaculated Pendry and Mail together, Tonkin smoking in silence.

Phillip gasped and stared in amazement. “Dondersteen!” he ejaculated loudly, and nearly dropped his half-conscious and swaying burden on the ground.

“What’s that?” ejaculated Joseph Stagg in a sharp tone.

“A comet of gold!” ejaculated the captain. “Thatsh good!”

Freddie nearly rolled out of his chair.

The father of Samoylov threw himself back, and ejaculated broken words behind his wife’s ear. The mother ejaculated in a sudden burst of excitement; she minded less his somewhat rude ejaculation: “Ho! Ho! South! South! The vervloekte Keerl! the plepshurk! the smeerlap!”

“What on earth does this mean?” I ejaculated.

“Can’t you see with your own eyes?” he ejaculated, attempting to walk on.

“Ha!” ejaculated the old lady.

“Hum!” ejaculated Mr. Stagg.

“O Lord!” ejaculated Titmouse, involuntarily, and almost unconsciously, staring stupidly at Gammon. Mr. Gammon soon felt the presence of his secret.

“Lord, Mr. Gammon!” ejaculated Titmouse, passing his hand hastily over his damp forehead—his agitation visibly increasing. Gammon gazed at him for a moment with fury; and “Good thunder!” they ejaculated.

“Great God!” ejaculated the others.

Dinmont at length got up, and, having shaken his huge dreadnought greatcoat, as a Newfoundland dog does his shaggy hide when he comes out of the water, ejaculated. The Little Russian ejaculated. Aunt Nettie, of course, ejaculated, “goodness gracious!” and laughed.

Ben Zoof broke out into the most vehement ejaculations.

“Gentle!” ejaculated Bartlemy, the artist, with profound conviction.

“He’s our little pet,” said Rob. “Come here, Ben, dear. Ben Zoof!” he called aloud.

“Ben who?” inquired the major.

“Zoof! Ben Zoof!” ejaculated Servadac, who could scarcely shout loud enough to relieve his pent-up feelings. “That’s our—our nice—gentle—oh, dear me!—our nice, gentle, old Ben.”

“Well, this is a pretty piece of business!” ejaculated Marilla.

“Incredible!” ejaculated the colonel.

“Incredible!” echoed the major. But of a sudden he ejaculated. “God bless my soul!” ejaculated that startled gentleman adventurer, and collapsed onto a settee as if his legs had been mown from under him.

“Holy cats!” he ejaculated.

“Brother!” ejaculated the other.

“Bless my soul!” ejaculated the landlord, in bewilderment. “Where did he come from?”

“Bless me! Yes!” ejaculated the hardware man finally.

“Humph!” ejaculated the hardware dealer again.

“Eh wow! Eh wow!” ejaculated the honest farmer, as he looked round upon his friend’s miserable apartment and wretched accommodation—“What’s this o’t! what’s this o’t!” he ejaculated.

The place was, in fact, becoming less tenable. Members of the congregation were interjecting, “Glory Hallelujah!” “Praise be His Name!” and the other worshipful ejaculations which make a sort of running accompaniment on such occasions.

“Great Heavens above!” ejaculated Piers.

“Heaven be praised!” ejaculated the captain, and he went on in the tones of a keen excitement.

The Dominie groaned deeply, and ejaculated.

At this unexpected and involuntary explosion of his weapon, the Dominie exclaimed, “Prodigious!” which is his usual ejaculation when astonished. “Great God!” ejaculated the others, but “Pro-di-gi-ous!” was the only ejaculation they ever extorted from the much-enduring man. This escaped my notice at the time, you may easily believe; but in talking over the scene afterwards, Hazlewood made us very merry with Dominie’s ignorant but zealous valor.

The good Dominie uttered his usual ejaculation of “Prodigious!” and then strode back to his post.

Hazlewood seconded him with great spirit. “Oh, your Excellency,” ejaculated the orderly, “look there! look there!” Then pointed to a table, upon which was some cold meat, and a spirit lamp, and a captain of the 8th Artillery & two officers who had presumed to do their duty.

Hazlewood longed to accompany the military. The Dominie looked upon him with that sort of surprise with which we can conceive a tame bear might regard his future associate, the monkey, on their being first introduced to each other. Sir Robert Hazlewood was rather puzzled at this intimation. “Please!” he ejaculated.

But the other heeded not, and with head thrown back against the wall, and brawny chest expanded, almost drowned the rest of the voices by his marvellous roars. Then with an ejaculation of “Here goes!” he jumped over the intervening crack of space and landed in the middle of us like a sack of coal. Had I not been seated really I think he would have knocked me off the rock.

“Cursed friar!” I ejaculated mentally.

“Well, I never!” ejaculated Abner Balberry.

“For Heaven’s sake!” ejaculated Aunt Nettie. “Thanks to the saints no further harm was done,” ejaculated the old lady shuddering. And with this compassionate ejaculation, she retreated into her own premises. (No wonder the girls ejaculated at her smartness.)

The good Dominie stretched out with a murmur of relief and comfort. The ground felt like the softest couch. “Hullo!” he ejaculated softly.

“You!” ejaculated Halicarnassus, contemptuously.

“The devil!” ejaculated Pritchen.

As for the Dominie, my father took an opportunity of begging to exchange snuff-boxes with him. The honest gentleman was much flattered with the proposal, extolled the beauty of his snuff-box excessively, smiled at the snuff box fondly, caressing it with his finger.

My father looked at him again. “This snuff box, to which so great a value is attached!  How did you get such a… Gold!” he ejaculated, but the Dominie made no answer.

Peter meanwhile was looking at the snuffbox, which the priest still held in his hand, and admiring its brave repoussé work of leaves and flowers, and the escutcheon engraved on the lid. “My that’s fine!” he ejaculated, wiping the perspiration from his forehead with the sleeve of his coat.

The Dominie groaned. “Wait. I’ll tell you the whole story. You shall see for yourself.”

“Go on,” ejaculated Tregear.

“Yes, yes, yes,” cried Tinfoil, “where did you get such a thing as this?”

“Oh!” I cried.

The Duchessa’s eyes were intent. “The story—? Tell me the story,” she pronounced in a breath, with imperious eagerness.

He told his story accordingly, often interrupted by ejaculations.


Source texts in order of appearance:

In the Closed Room by Frances Hodgson Burnett
Grace Harlowe’s First Year at Overton College by Jessie Graham Flower
Esther by Rosa Nouchette Carey
Carolyn of the Corners by Ruth Belmore Endicott
The Duke’s Children by Antholy Trollope
The Frontiersman by H. A. Cody
My Antonia by Willa Cather
Woven with the Ship by Cyrus Townsend Brady
The Re-Creation of Brian Kent by Harold Bell Wright
I Walked in Arden by Jack Crawford
Missy By Dana Gatlin
From Farm To Fortune, Or, Nat Nason’s Strange Experience by Horatio Alger, Jr.
The Bars of Iron by Ethel May Dell
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Bernard Brooks’ Adventure by Horatio Alger, Jr.
The Adventures of Dick Trevanion by Herbert Strang
The Land of Joy by Ralph Henry Barbour
The Laughing Cavalier by Baroness Orczy
Off on a Comet or Hectory Servadac by Jules Verne
The Little Warrior by P. G. Wodehouse
Mother by Maksim Gorky
Grisly Grisell by Charlotte M. Yonge
The Laughing Cavalier by Baroness Orczy
Gala-Days by Gail Hamilton
Ten Thousand a-Year: Volume 3 by Samuel Warren
The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane
Guy Mannering by Sir Walter Scott
The Little Grey House by Marion Ames Taggart
Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maud Montgomery
The Hunchback of Notre Dame by Victor Hugo
Hilda Lessways by Arnold Bennett
When the World Shook by H. Rider Haggard
A Christian Woman by Emilia Pardo Bazán
The Ivory Snuff Box by Arnold Fredericks
Riders of the Purple Sage by Zane Grey
The Cardinal’s Snuff-Box by Henry Harland

The Untold POC History of California

Rishi Reddi takes “epic” to the next level with this untold PoC history of California. Passage West is a novel of California, of the U.S.-Mexico border, and of America, that you probably had no idea you needed in your life. The novel begins with Karak Singh on his deathbed in a Los Angeles hospital in 1974 bequeathing a box of “of things only you and I know about” to his old friend and farming partner, Ram Singh. 

The letters send the Punjab, India-born Ram back to 1913 and to his early days as an immigrant in America. Reddi then introduces us to the early farming landscape of California’s Imperial Valley—and to the Sikhs, Japanese, and Mexicans who work the land as sharecroppers and laborers—and their white overlords. As they raise cotton and cantaloupes out of the desert sand, their lives are challenged by shifting legal realities, anti-immigration fervor, fragile harvests, and lopsided sales deals. World War I intrudes and sends two of the community’s young men, Amarjeet, and his Japanese American friend, Harry to the European trenches. 

The war’s end brings more racism and new laws against land ownership by “aliens”—which leads to severe losses and eventually, to a murder. Passage West edges over 400 pages but Reddi’s prose, measured and with exquisite attention to sonics of accents and multiple languages, makes it a pleasure. The exacting renditions of the immigrants’ newly acquired languages, be it Spanish or English, charm and lay bare the bewilderment of living in another tongue. More than once it cleaved my heart. Take this line, for example, from the Japanese farmer Tomoya Moriyama upon being evicted from his land, shortly after his American-born son dies in World War I: “What country take only son and not let you to stay?” 

I spoke to Reddi about writing a global history, imagining lone women, and to whom any land ever really belongs. 


J.R. Ramakrishnan: While it’s centered in California, your novel has a global scopethe Punjab, Manila, France, and Mexico are some of the places your characters have been. Where did this story begin for you?

Rishi Reddi: I had originally wanted to write about a love triangle between a newlywed Punjabi man who temporarily comes to the US to make money (Ram), and the wife he leaves behind (Padma), and a Mexican woman who has fought in her country’s revolution (Adela). But my research into the 1910s opened many other doors: the revolutionary Ghadar party’s global movement to overthrow the British in India; the adventures of America’s World War I troops in France, and the manner in which that war intersected with the 1918 pandemic. The more I learned about the South Asian experience of those years, the more I felt that the depiction of that historic moment through these characters needed to touch upon all these factors. 

JRR: You’ve woven together multiple histories—–British India, early South Asian immigration to the U.S., California farming, the Mexican Revolution, World War I, Spanish Flu, and much else. The characters who experience these events are on the precarious fringes of life. How long did it take to research the historical settings, and how did you go about it? 

RR: I started with trying to flesh out my protagonists, Ram and Karak, and I read a few studies by sociologists about the communities formed by South Asian immigrants at this time. I also looked at many contemporaneous newspaper articles, magazines, governmental reports, transcripts of court cases and Congressional testimony, and even the lyrics of musical scores. It was fascinating to find how much South Asians and the subcontinent had captured the imaginations of folks living in America. The most important part of my exploration led me to the grown children of the real men who had lived in California in the 1910s and ‘20s. These children shared their family stories with me. My research came in fits and starts and took me a long time, about a decade. I wanted the novel to depict the lives of everyday, ordinary people, as well as the historical figures we still know about today.

JRR: Ram is an outsider in the U.S. but he’s also an outsider in the farm in that he is part Hindu and not Sikh like the rest of the farm family. His father was Sikh but he wasn’t raised in the tradition. Ram seems defined by his fatherlessness. Would you tell us about how you shaped Ram’s identity (of mixed religion and othered to the Sikhs), especially as he himself expresses concerns about miscegenation later on in the novel?

RR: I am not Sikh and was not raised in the faith, so I cannot speak about the religion from an insider’s perspective. But if one reads about the history of the religion, one finds, in earlier years, a fluidity between the Sikh and Hindu communities in India. Among certain strata of Punjabi society, there was intermarriage and, it seems, mutual respect.  The relationship between Sikhism and Hinduism is complex and has been the subject of significant research and scholarly writing. Ram’s identity as half Sikh and half Hindu might symbolize some of this complexity and search for identity within each faith. I am not sure that Ram would have experienced his parents’ interfaith marriage to be akin to his interfaith love affair with Adela…. It’s an interesting question you present! I do think that his initial attraction to Jivan is rooted in his grief over never having known his own father, who was an observant Sikh.

JRR: There are two scenes that seem quite important in the depiction of Sikh identity. The first is when Jivan throws his British army medals into the Salton Sea, and the second is when Karak asks Rosa, his soon-to-be Mexican wife to cut off his hair. I was wondering if you could talk about these scenes and how you chose to describe the realities of maintaining historical identity and culture in America?

RR: During my research, I read that both of these incidents had actually occurred to real men, although in slightly different form. When I learned of them, I thought there was no better way to dramatize the tension between loss of cultural identity and the pressures of assimilation. I had to include them in the book.

JRR: I was so hopeful for Padma, Ram’s wife left behind in India. Can you share a little about how you imagined her?

RR: Padma may be the character that suffers and loses the most in the book, and her life is emblematic of so many South Asian women who were left behind while their husbands went abroad for work. Because of the collective family structure, their desires, hopes, and dreams often went unrecognized and unrealized. When people today think of these women, they don’t allow themselves to imagine the fullness of their internal world: how did Padma cope with her loneliness? Couldn’t she have had a secret sweetheart—which may have been unfathomable in strict society, but nevertheless would occur? Couldn’t she have had a talent, a skill, a sense of humor, or an intelligence for which she would be known? Of course she would. 

I wanted to give Padma a powerful voice in the novel, but that was difficult to do in a tale that focused on men’s experience in western lands. So I chose to represent her point of view directly—through her own letters. I wrote her epilogue in its final form years ago. I knew that was the emotional note on which I wanted to end the book. Padma, fittingly, has the last word.

JRR: Adela was also super intriguing. She is a widow of a man who fought in the Mexican Revolution. I was horrified when Ram cast her aside. Who/what inspired her?

RR: In creating the character of Adela, I was inspired by the stories of the real soldaderas, Mexican women who filled a wide variety of roles during the Revolution, including that of a soldier on the frontlines. Some were camp followers who provided emotional and sexual comfort for the male soldiers, some were spouses who traveled with their children in tow. I thought of Adela as initially following her husband into battle, but then taking up arms herself, in an idealistic bid for freedom. 

JRR: The scene of the Angel Island immigration interview that Padma undergoes is upsetting. Most people might be less aware of the history of Angel Island, perhaps maybe because Ellis Island is the story of old-time immigration that is the preferred, more European one. Could you talk about how this piece of the story came together? It was incredibly interesting that you had one of the immigration officers be a Punjabi American. It recalled for me the Latino border patrol agents who police the US-Mexico border in our contemporary moment. 

The story of the arrival of Spaniards and Chinese and other Asian groups has always occupied an inferior role in the U.S. narrative.

RR: Throughout the writing of Passage West, I was interested in the way that the mythologized history of US immigration follows the European trail, and is founded on the early Dutch and British presence in the Eastern states. The story of immigration in Western parts of the U.S., the arrival of Spaniards and Chinese and other Asian groups, has always occupied an inferior role in the US narrative. The early South Asians— students, traders, revolutionaries, intellectuals, farmers, and laborers were significant (if not numerous) members of this western landscape. The idea for the U.S. immigration employee of Indian origin came to me after I read an account of the ship Komagata Maru in Vancouver, during which at least one Punjabi man was suspected to be working for the Canadian government against Punjabi immigrant interests.

JRR: World War I enters the novel when Amarjeet, Jivan’s nephew, and Harry, the son of the Moriyama family who farm the neighboring plot, enlist. I can’t think of many books which portray PoC in WWI. The situation seems somewhat more representative with WWII (The English Patient, backstory of White Teeth, Miracle at St. Anna, etc) beyond the Tom Hanks versions/The Bridge on River Kwai/Changi Prison narratives. Was it your intent from the start to have WWI be a part of the novel?

RR: We know that President Woodrow Wilson actively encouraged immigrants from all nations, including Japan and China, to become part of the US military, and undertook a propaganda campaign to that end. My research revealed that there were numerous men of South Asian descent that had enlisted in the US Army during WWI. We have some records of those men, and we also have records of South Asian American publications that were encouraging men to enlist because of the skills that they would learn in the military. This fact was too compelling to leave out of my novel. I chose to include it because I think that many Punjabi men, especially those who came from families with a military background, would have considered the army as an employment option. 

JRR: It’s been a while since I cried in the course of any book but I did when Moriyamas got the news of Harry’s death after believing he was coming home, having been honored for his bravery after saving a racist fellow soldier. What a devastating moment! Then, things get worse for the Moriyamas with Alien Land Law and the family lose their farm. The question of belonging and to whom land belong seems to be very much at the heart of the novel. You have Karak’s grandfather who loses land in India and Karak meditates on the different previous owners of the farm from the U.S. government to the King of Spain to its indigenous forebears. Jivan asks: “Who belongs in what place on this earth? The British did not belong in India…Perhaps he did not belong in the Imperial Valley either.” It seems that you’ve lived many places yourself and I wonder what your personal take is on Jivan’s question? 

RR: I lived in many different cities and three different continents during my growing-up years, and have not been able to answer that question. I think that’s why I have Jivan ask it…. I’d love a good answer!

7 Dark Thrillers About Friendships Gone Wrong

I braved the dating scene for nearly five years in New York, but it was a friend breakup that hurt me the most during those tumultuous early-20s. It felt so sudden, so cataclysmic, so altogether unexplainable. I found myself wanting so badly a chance to have another conversation—to get some sort of closure. A years-long friendship was over in a flash over what felt at the time like a big miscommunication. It all blew up over email on a Tuesday morning, and I found myself in my boss’s office, failing to hold back tears, before I could even step out for lunch. The end of my romantic entanglements were relatively tame and healthy in comparison.

All the Broken People by Leah Konen

When I set out to write my first thriller, All the Broken People, I knew I wanted to center the intricacies and intimacies of female friendship. The book follows Lucy, a Brooklyn woman who flees to the country and gets more than she bargained for when she helps her new best friend, Vera, fake her husband’s death. The blossoming codependent friendship between the two women has all the tension, intrigue and betrayal of a complex love affair—and the circle of women and friendships that surround them add plenty of interconnected drama to the mix. Kirkus even highlighted many of the friend-to-frenemy imbroglios, noting the “webs that slowly contract, strangling characters in the threads.”

Here are a few of my favorite thrillers about friendships gone wrong: 

Behind Her Eyes by Sarah Pinborough

It’s your classic girl meets boy but the boy is her boss and his wife is about to become her new best friend story. Though the love triangle is firmly set-up between single-mom Louise, her boss David, and David’s beautiful wife Adele, the true sparks and tension come through in the battle of wits between these two unlikely friends. Add an ending that’s unlike anything you’ve ever read in a suspense novel, and you’ve got a manically modern and inventive read.

The Herd

The Herd by Andrea Bartz

Two sisters. Four college friends. One elite women’s coworking space. One dead body. What could possibly go wrong? Andrea Bartz’s follow-up to The Lost Night is rife with the complexities of female friendship—she expertly turns up the tension with long-hidden secrets, jealousies, blackmail, and betrayal. 

Social Creature by Tara Isabella Burton

Social Creature by Tara Isabella Burton

Everything changes for scrappy, barely-scraping by Louise when the wealthy, enigmatic Lavinia hires her as an SAT tutor for her younger sister. A one-off job quickly morphs into a wildly toxic and codependent friendship—and obsession—that opens doors, both financial and literary, for the increasingly manipulative and dangerous Louise. It’s a lavish New York City novel that ushers in a new brand of millennial-centric noir. 

The Hunting Party by Lucy Foley

This classic closed-door murder mystery in the tradition of Agatha Christie and Ruth Ware follows a group of 30-something Oxford alums on a snowed-in New Year’s getaway at a rugged estate in the Scottish Highlands. When one of them turns up dead, tensions rise as these friends are forced to come to terms with decades of secrets and betrayals, from adultery to stalking. The drama between the self-absorbed and manipulative Miranda and her reserved best friend Katie is particularly juicy. 

Force of Nature by Jane Harper

A corporate retreat in remote bushland goes awry when one of five women turns up missing on a days-long hike. Detective Aaron Falk is on the case, as the missing woman is a whistleblower set to help him take down her corrupt company. As this slow-burn mystery unfolds, we get a look into the complicated friendships, secrets, and duplicities that keep tensions simmering among this quintet of women. 

The First Mistake by Sandie Jones

When Alice, the brains behind a successful interior design firm, suspects her husband, Nathan, of cheating on her, she turns to her best friend, Beth, for solace and comfort—but while her husband has plenty of secrets of his own, Alice will soon discover her confidante does, too.

The Family Upstairs

The Family Upstairs by Lisa Jewell

In Lisa Jewell’s compelling domestic suspense, 25-year-old Libby inherits a multi-million dollar estate in London’s tony Chelsea neighborhood. The catch? 25 years ago, the police were called to the house with reports of a baby crying. Downstairs, three people were dead and the four other children were gone. Though family drama dominates this who- and whydunnit, the catalyst is a toxic friendship that manages to tear apart a family from within. 

Like the Salons It’s Named For, “Tertulia” Is a Political Meeting Disguised as a Party

I’ve been to many a tertulia in my life. In Costa Rica, these informal literary, artistic, or intellectual gatherings are as common and important as Sunday mass, and just as enlightening. Recently, thanks to Vincent Toro, I’ve experienced two types of tertulias I hadn’t thought possible—the first, his unforgettable new collection titled Tertulia, and the second, this unforgettable interview with him. But like all those intimate, late-night gatherings, I could convene with Vincent about his poetry, his inspirations, and the deeply personal and unapologetically political nature of his art. With his book like the background melody of a guitar played by a good friend, he and I sat across from each other digitally and invoked our own healing, illuminating tertulia. 


John Manuel Arias: We who are Latin American know very well what it is—this incredible communing of friends, of minds, celebrating what is art and what is political and how they intersect. I’d love to know, what has your experience been with tertulias? Do they differ based on geography, on language?

Tertulia by Vincent Toro

Vincent Toro: I have to admit that I wasn’t aware of the tertulia—as word, event, and concept—until I was in my thirties. My grandmother frequently had gatherings in her house in Puerto Rico that were clearly tertulias, if no one was overtly calling them by that name. 

Back in college I was also participating in what could also be categorized as tertulias. My schoolmates and I were bored and broke, and were itching to do something that wasn’t a school sponsored club event or fraternity party. I don’t know how it was initiated, but we found ourselves gathering on weekends in the dorm bathrooms to share poems and stories we wrote, hold musical jam sessions, perform improv, and play surrealist games. In many respects, my path as an artist was forged from what we did to occupy ourselves with those gatherings.

It wasn’t until later that I came to know of tertulias as a Spanish and Latin American tradition with a centuries-old history. In learning about them, I’ve come to understand that they do differ based on cultural and geographic circumstances. The Latin American tertulias seem to be rather more intentional in their outcome. The participants are well aware that they are building community and creating an experience from which one can develop. Back in college, we weren’t considering how our gatherings could be put to some larger use. As “Americanos,” our gatherings tend toward the brazen and the raucous. We weren’t being mindful of how these gatherings could be impactful. But the Latin American tertulias, though also committed to joy and play, have a decidedly political bent to them. The tertulias were acts of civil disobedience in places where fascist regimes were repressing people and prohibiting large groups from holding public meetings and events. So I think what is at stake is different, and as a result how the tertulias are enacted, what they represent, and what is spawned from them is quite a different thing. 

The tertulias were acts of civil disobedience in places where fascist regimes were prohibiting public meetings and events.

JMA: I want to celebrate the musicality in the collection—one of my favorite parts of a tertulia is someone whipping out their guitar to accompany the voice of a drunken friend. There are many references to music throughout—discos, demo versions, club mixes—how does music inform the form and rhythm of your poetry?

VT: The music is everything. Poetry is, at its core, music. Sound is what draws me into a poem. There is music in other writing, but poetry centers music in a way that other writing genres do not (except for maybe theater, which is fundamentally poetry spoken in many voices). 

I’ve often confessed that I am a poet because I was not able to become a musician. Music is an absolute obsession of mine. With poetry I can create a kind of music, though it never fully subdues that longing I have within me to have been a great singer or instrumentalist. The influence of the music I love is spilling out on every page of my books, to be honest. The records I was listening to when I was working on these collections impacted the formal structures of the poem, their syntax and rhythms, and their thematic elements. Tertulia is in many respects a dialogue with the music, films, and books I was digesting at the time I was crafting those poems. 

And I should also say that this intimacy with music is essential to my revision process. I perform the poems out loud and listen to their music and melody to shape and polish the poems. As I tell my students, the poem on the page is sheet music, it is a map, a blueprint from which to draw out the performance of the poem. 

JMA: This musicality shows up in two important families of poems—your “Cicastristes” series (which still haunt me; they’re beautiful), and your “Areyto” series. The latter has me especially fascinated. For those who don’t know, Areytos are essentially Taíno epics, sung to celebrate past heroes, danced to honor their deeds. I’d love to know why the precolonial areyto in these poems? 

VT: I decided in the early stages of composing my first book that I would use the areyto as a conceptual engine for all my poetry. My aim is for all my books to have “areyto” poems included in them. I suppose I imagine all my poems as areytos. But I title certain poems with the word for a very specific reason rooted in my anti-colonial ideology. The areytos were powerful cultural agents for Taíno people. They were events that unified the tribes. They were celebratory and they were instructional. The areytos not only celebrated heroes, but also offered prophecy and, like all theater, provided the community with a lens through which to reflect upon itself. The areytos are actually a kind of precursor to the tertulia, one with entirely indigenous origins. During the colonization, the invaders acted to deliberately eliminate the areytos, because they knew that the areyto was a source of power for the Taínos, that erase them would be a way of erasing their history and thus dominating them. As an act of preservation of that history, I use “areyto” to title poems that I feel embody their elements and their design (at least as far as we know what they looked and sounded like from the salvaged history). 

JMA: It’s impossible to be a Latinx person and not weave politics into your poetry. That is definitely true as a Boricua, as Puerto Rico is still a colony of the American empire, and especially after the tragedy of Hurricane María. “Puerto Rico Is Burning Its Dead” is particularly devastating, and becomes the most seething criticism of the empire’s neglect of the island, and your people. How do your own politics inform the way you write about Puerto Rico?

VT: I am first and foremost the offspring of the Nuyorican poets. Like them, I am a diasporic Boricua. My relationship to the island is one of a distant relative. With regard to the founding Nuyorican poets, their poems were charged with a longing to return to the island, to reclaim Puerto Rico as their home. Poets like Pedro Pietri, Sandra Maria Estevez, and Piri Thomas write Puerto Rico as the treasure that was taken from us. This idealization of the island was a necessary response for displaced people who have been stripped of homeland, history, and culture through forced occupation. 

I am first and foremost the offspring of the Nuyorican poets. My relationship to the island is one of a distant relative.

Much of my poetry unabashedly takes up this performance of Puerto Rico as idealized motherland, but I try to be cognizant of my position as a New York–born Puerto Rican. Puerto Rican writers born and raised on the island, and later generations of diasporic Puerto Ricans, they still exalt the island and its culture, but they bravely also engage with its complexities and its problems. I have tried to commit to that in my more recent writings. I still have a political and personal need to make music of the island as idealized homeland, but I am also trying to get “closer to it” by using my work to try to understand the reality of those who live on the island and therefore feel the impact of colonization in a much more direct fashion. 

Even with “Puerto Rico is Burning Its Dead,” the impetus for writing that poem was born out of the anxiety I was feeling about our family here in the States losing communication with our family on the island after the hurricane. We did not know for several days if everyone was okay. This uncertainty was stressful, but I understood that my worry was nothing compared to what my family, and everyone on the island, was experiencing. There’s just no equating those two distinct circumstances. And yet there is a connection there, one that is truly and deeply felt. 

JMA: I took special notice of your “Core Curriculum Standards” series, where the settings are often schools, and explore themes of masculinity, class difference, and even empire. I know you are an educator. How does observing what is happening in school systems now, as well as your own schoolyard experiences, play into these poems?

VT: A good number of the poems were composed in classrooms next to my students as they were writing. Their content came from our discussions and our project work. For the past 20 years I have served as a social justice arts educator. I teach art—creative writing and theater—through a process that balances the teaching of craft with how to use that craft for the aims of social change. Social justice pedagogy is equal parts artistic practice and civic practice. In this method, art is not a product, but a process to understand the world and create healthy paths to change. 

We tackle some really difficult issues, and I have to say it is quite inspiring to watch, for example, a room full of fifth graders discuss sexism, or to listen to high school students share research for their poems on U.S. immigration policies. I have found the only way to conduct this kind of work successfully is to also “take the class” with my students. I do the work that I challenge them to, work that requires compassion and courage from all participants. A good number of the poems in the book were a result of my doing this work alongside my students. 

If my poems are gritos, then these poems are gritos about the systemic violence I witness in the education system. This violence, to be clear, is not a violence that students commit on each other. This violence is a violence committed by powerful adults on children. We often hear rhetoric from adults in leadership positions about how children are precious, and yet their attacks on the safety and growth of young people through their policies reveals that they actually do not believe them to be precious at all. Especially if those children are black and brown. 

But I want to be clear: the adults I am talking about are not the ones teaching in the classrooms. Teachers are doing the good work. They should be honored. I’m talking about the so-called “education reform” politicians, the corporate leaders and executive administrators who feel that an education should be provided only if they can profit from it. 

JMA: One of the poems that stood out to me—that continues to wrack my brain and challenges me to do the work—is “On Money.” This year at AWP in San Antonio, I took a Lyft to the convention center, and the driver began telling me about himself—he was Cuban, he had been in the States for about 20 years, without his family. He also told me he had been a lawyer back in Cuba. And he was a Christian (that he made sure to repeat). He then began saying that he was writing a book about how Capitalism is the ultimate expression of Christianity—the subjugation of all the world and its species as was mandated by God in the Old Testament. I saw that striking resemblance in “On Money.” 

Many people have expressed that they don’t understand metaphor. Yet their entire life is organized around the belief in metaphor that is money.

VT:  I have no answers about money, so I don’t know what the reader should extract from the poem. I guess I hope that the poem will do for the reader is to ignite an impulse within them to conduct their own inquiry about money, its value, its function, and its meaning.

There is, maybe, a parallel idea that I am attempting to confront in “On Money.” Money—as a thing, as an idea—has always troubled me. I recall being a child and trying to understand how money could prevent people from getting things that they should fundamentally have a right to, like food, shelter, medical care, and education. In my working-class family, money was a powerfully oppressive force that often tore at the connection we had to each other. This has motivated me to try to learn about how money actually operates and why humans created the machine of money to organize their world. Primarily, I wanted to comprehend how money gets its value. I read a number of texts on economics and money, and what I found was that even economists don’t seem to know what gives money its value. But one text I read, Money: A Biography by Felix Martin, was quite explicit in saying that money is not a thing, it is a representation, a symbol, and what gives it its value is human beings faith in its value. Or, at least, that is what I deduced from the book. I guess in that sense I understand your Lyft driver, for faith is considered a religious act and Christianity is a religion. Both money and religion depend on faith.

This led me to a great irony: in my work as a poet and literature teacher, so many people young and old have expressed that they don’t understand metaphor. Yet their entire life is organized around the belief in metaphor that is money. Money is a symbol of human need and desire, it is a metaphor bridging that need and desired with an object that one thinks might fulfill that need. It is a representation, a promise. But it is not the thing itself.