Page 37 – Electric Literature

Whatever’s Killing the Cattle Is Killing Him Too

Posted on August 11, 2025October 7, 2025 by Preety Sidhu

“The Cattleman” by Aaron Gwyn

The little Angus heifer was lying in the shade of a black oak in the south pasture, legs tucked beneath her and her head a half foot off the ground. JR cranked down the window and sat with the pickup idling, watching the cow. She was a three-year-old and he’d never known her to be sick, but the way she had her head canted was very strange. Her open mouth was strange.

“Do you think it’s heatstroke?” Mary Louise asked.

“Don’t know,” JR told his wife. “Worth taking a look.”

He pushed the column shifter into park, fetched his hat from the bench seat beside him, opened the door, and stepped out.

He waded through the switchgrass, squaring the hat on his head. Within ten yards of the heifer, he felt the hair stand on the back of his neck and he stopped as though he’d struck a wall.

The first thing he noticed was the cow’s left ear was missing and the next thing he noticed was her left eye was gone. She wasn’t breathing.

JR moved forward slowly and began to circle the heifer. When he rounded her far side, he stopped once more and then squatted, reaching for the ground to steady himself. A rectangular swatch of hide had been sheared from her back. By a scalpel, looked like. Or a box cutter. He got to his feet and studied the bare earth beneath the tree. He’d had coyotes pull down calves over the years—yearlings, mostly—but there were no coyote tracks in the dirt, no tracks of any kind, not even the cow’s.

He heard the truck door slam and turned to see Mary Louise walking around the vehicle’s front end.

“Don’t come up here!” he called.

She stopped and stood there with her eyebrows arched. He asked her to get back in the pickup and Mary Louise said, “Did she fall?”

“Momma,” he said, “get back in the truck for me.” But his wife only crossed her arms.

JR glanced back at the heifer. Flies crawled across her flank and stifle. Flies swarmed around her parted lips. A breeze stirred the leaves overhead and there was the tang of urine in the air. He looked at the tree line across the pasture, then at the road that wound up toward the house. Cicadas buzzed from the buffalo grass. Birds called from the oaks. He started for the pickup, staggering slightly, frightened in a way he didn’t understand.

JR stood at the kitchen counter, flipping through the phone book. He could hear Mary Louise’s sewing machine upstairs, the click and chug of the treadle. His shirt was soaked in sweat.

When Sheriff Bledsoe pulled up the driveway in his cruiser, he walked out and shook the man’s hand.

Bledsoe said, “Cindy says you got a calf down?”

“Be better just to show you,” JR told him, and the two of them climbed in the old Ford and started down the dirt road that ran through the woods.

Bledsoe was a short man with thinning hair and a face that always seemed to be sunburned. He looked over at JR and said, “And how is Mary Louise?”

“Well,” said JR, “right now she’s kind of rattled.”

The sheriff didn’t seem to hear him. He said, “We saw her over at the bake sale last weekend. Wanted to see if she had any of those little tarts she makes, but Patty was in a hurry.”

JR nodded. He could feel the sheriff looking at him, waiting for a response, but he wasn’t about to talk bake sales with everything he’d seen that morning. After a few moments, Bledsoe turned to regard the pines blurring past the passenger window.

Then he said, “It’s a cow we’re going down here to look at?”

“Cow,” JR said.

He stopped the truck in the road a couple dozen yards from the oak tree in the pasture. The heifer was just as he’d left her, and when they came walking up, Bledsoe cupped his mouth in one hand and whispered something JR couldn’t hear. They stood there for half a quiet minute, staring at the striated ribbon of muscle and fat where the patch of hide had been cut away.

The sheriff said, “I never seen a dead animal with its head raised like that.”

JR told him he hadn’t either.

“This is how you found her?” Bledsoe asked.

“Exactly how I found her, bout ten o’clock this morning.”

“Remember when you saw her before that?”

“Feeding time yesterday evening,” said JR, “down at the barn.”

Bledsoe had stooped and begun to study the ground. He said, “Wasn’t coyotes.”

“No,” said JR, “I’m confident of that.”

The sheriff stepped closer and took a knee beside the carcass. He pulled a pen from his shirt pocket and prodded the heifer’s mouth with its tip, pressing her lower jaw down a few inches. His face flushed and he glanced up at JR.

“Come look at this,” he said.

JR walked over and knelt beside Bledsoe and saw what he’d missed before: the cow’s tongue had been sliced away below the root.

The creep of something climbed his backbone, joint by joint. He thought it was like coming home after a long trip to find your house ransacked, your drawers pilfered, muddy boot prints in your bed.

He said, “I hope you’re able to locate whoever did this ‘fore I do, Jack.”

“Well,” said the sheriff, “I don’t blame you feeling that way. You ain’t had a run-in with anybody, have you?”

“I don’t have run-ins,” JR said.

“I know it,” Bledsoe told him. “Those your tracks?” He was pointing the pen at a pair of prints in the soft earth under the tree.

“Them are mine,” JR said. “I’d known what I was walking up on, I’d’ve called you first.”

The sheriff nodded. He palmed his thighs, rose with a grunt, and stood there gripping the pen in one hand like a wand.

Then he said, “I reckon you already did a head count.”

“Did one first thing,” JR told him. “My Brahmans are up in the corral and the Angus and Black Baldies are in the west pasture. All accounted for.”

“Nothing else out of place?”

“Nothing,” JR said.

Bledsoe shook his head. “I never seen anything like it,” he said.

“No,” said JR.

“If we could figure out how to get her loaded, you might haul her in to Dr. Thrasher.”

JR looked at the man. “What would that do?”

“Hell, I don’t know,” said the sheriff. “I’d think a vet could tell you more than I could. This is the damnedest thing I ever seen.”

On the way back up to the house, Bledsoe sat silent as a sundial, staring at the dashboard. He still had the pen in his right hand and JR realized the sheriff wasn’t going to put it back in his pocket. Something about that troubled him worse than everything he’d seen that morning. Bledsoe hadn’t wanted to touch the heifer, and he didn’t want to touch anything that had. As though it might wear off on him.

“Wasn’t any blood,” the sheriff mumbled.

“What’s that?” JR asked.

“Blood,” said the sheriff. “I didn’t see a single drop.”

JR lifted his boot off the gas pedal and let the pickup roll to a stop, then just sat with his hands on the steering wheel. Crows cawed from the black oaks. A squirrel darted from the tree line, paused in the road with its ears twitching, then leapt back into the brush.

JR said, “I want you to listen at me, Jack. I’m going to find out who done this. I aim to treat it like a full-time job.”

“I can appreciate that,” Bledsoe said.

“Tell you something else. I catch somebody stepping foot on my property, it ain’t going to be no conversation. I’ll wear the ground out with him.”

Bledsoe nodded and cleared his throat. “I’m going to act like I didn’t hear that,” he said, “but if you shoot some ole boy for trespassing, you drag him in your house before you call us.”

“Is that right?” said JR.

“That’s right,” the sheriff said. “And you didn’t get that from me.”

They were sitting out on the deck after supper, watching the sunset reflect off the pond.

“And you don’t think it could’ve been a bobcat?” Mary Louise said.

JR shook his head and set his coffee mug on the little table between them. “It was a perfect patch cut off that heifer,” he told her. “Bobcats don’t carry pocketknives, last time I checked.”

Mary Louise brought the blue porcelain cup to her lips, blew into it, then tilted the cup, and sipped. She wore a nest of tight brown curls and in her plump, pretty face were a pair of hazel eyes.

“What did Jack have to say?”

“Not much,” said JR. “Seemed pretty baffled by the whole deal.”

“Well,” Mary Louise said, smoothing a hand over the left leg of her slacks, “I am too.”

Then into the quiet she said, “Where did you bury her?”

“Out on the pasture under that tree.”

“You don’t think the coyotes will dig her up?”

“Don’t know,” he said. “I cut down about five foot with the front-end loader. They’d have to work at it.”

Mary Louise said, “We ought to start shutting the gate down at the road. Of an evening, anyway.”

“Already done it.”

“Did you padlock it?”

“Padlocked it.”

They sat for several moments and then Mary Louise said, “Maybe it was teenagers.”

“Maybe.”

“Drunk teenagers pulling a prank.”

JR said, “Me and George Northcutt pulled a prank or two when we was kids. Never would’ve occurred to us to mess with a man’s cattle.”

“These kids now are different.”

“I mean that.”

“I saw this thing on TV,” she said. “There were people in Tulsa stringing cats to fences and a policeman said it was a Satanic deal.”

“Satanic?”

Mary Louise nodded. Then she said, “I don’t see how somebody could come in and do all that without Gretchen and Moses barking their heads off.”

“I thought about that,” he said. “Maybe they didn’t come up the drive.”

“You think they came through the woods?”

“Might’ve.”

Mary Louise seemed to consider that. She said, “If there was ever a reason to move into town, I don’t—”

“Momma,” he said, “don’t start.”

“Why not?”

“We’ve had that conversation,” he said.

“Yes,” she told him, “and we’re fixing to have it again.”

It’d become a sore spot between them and JR knew she couldn’t keep herself from prodding it.

“You know how I feel about this,” he said.

“And you know how I feel about throwing money out the window on your cows.” Her face had gone flushed. She brushed a piece of lint off her blouse.

He sipped his coffee. “They’re our cows,” he said.

“And is this our ranch?”

“You know it is.”

“I don’t know any such thing,” she said, her words coming a little faster, a little higher in pitch. “I’d like to be able to get something from the store without driving into Seminole. I’d like to meet Margaret and Lucille for lunch.”

“You meet them pretty regular,” JR said, trying to think of something that might put this to bed.

“Sitting out here on this farm,” she told him, “while you go around playing cowboy.”

She’d said that to him before and it always stung. He stood and tossed the last of his coffee over the porch rail, then turned and started for the door. He’d just opened it when she said, “JR?”

He glanced back at her and thought her face looked more troubled than mad: brow furrowed, eyes slightly wet.

“This has scared me something awful,” she said. “I don’t like knowing someone’s been on the place.”

“I don’t either,” he told her. “There’s nothing about it to like.”

He’d been looking for the Brahman going on three days, a little yearling named Belinda. It’d been two weeks since he’d found the mutilated heifer in the south pasture, and he was walking the fence line on the west side of his property, long about the shank of the afternoon. He glanced up and saw two turkey buzzards wheeling in the cobalt sky and knew he was about to come on something dead. He threaded his way through the brambles on the edge of the blackjack forest and went downhill through the oaks toward the creek.

He glanced up and saw two turkey buzzards wheeling in the cobalt sky and knew he was about to come on something dead.

The yearling was on her side in a brown bed of leaves, bloated, all four legs stretched out straight as a string. The air reeked of rotting flesh, sickly sweet. He approached from the animal’s rear, scanning the ground for tracks, and when he looked up, he saw there was an oval-shaped cavity where the cow’s vulva had been. He stood there, eyes watering from the smell. There was no doubt in his mind the cuts had been made by some sort of razor. He didn’t see a speck of blood. He turned and went back the way he’d come, stepping in his own boot prints, and when he returned a few hours later, Sheriff Bledsoe was with him.

It was Sunday and the man was out of uniform, but he’d brought a camera. He circled the heifer, taking pictures. He photographed the body, and he photographed the forest floor, then he asked JR to lift one of his feet off the ground, and he photographed the boot sole. When he was done, he capped the lens, and stood with the camera hanging from its leather strap, biting at his lower lip. He looked at JR.

“Left ear and eye,” said Bledsoe. “Just like the other.”

“Tongue too.”

“Tongue too,” the sheriff said.

JR pointed at the cow’s hind end. “They even cut out her business.”

“I seen that,” Bledsoe said, tapping his index finger against the camera’s lens cover.

“Jack,” said JR, “whoever’s doing this has done it before.”

“Meaning what?”

“Meaning it’s a smart chance it’s happening to someone else around here.”

The sheriff stood with the thumb of his left hand hooked in the rear pocket of his jeans. He said, “I think you might have something there. If I was to hold a meeting, would you mind telling folks what’s been going on?”

JR reached and scratched the whiskers on his cheek. “I reckon I could.” The sun beat down on them. “I don’t like a crowd,” he added.

“Don’t have to be nothing formal,” Bledsoe told him. “Just tell everybody what you seen. If there’s other ranchers have this happening, we might get an idea or two.”

“All right,” said JR.

“All right,” Bledsoe said. “I’ll go ahead and ask Buzz Gillespie to run it in the paper, and I believe I might get Brother Keith to mention it at service tonight.”

“I appreciate that,” JR said, but he was already worried what Mary Louise would say when he told her about the cow. She was liable to start in on him, demanding he sell the ranch. It’d be a real dust up and he didn’t know he had the wherewithal for that.

In fact, he knew he didn’t.

Friday evening, they gathered at the library down the street from the courthouse: Robert Gist and his wife, Lucille; George Northcutt and his. Ruth Martin was there with her grandson. Gene McQueen, Lois and Johnny Shoemaker, all three of the Buford brothers and their father, Gerald. Herb Gunter, Dr. Thrasher, Sandy Prince who owned the dog kennel north of town. Dennis Wisnatt came in swaying slightly; the man was often drunk. Turning to look back at the crowd who’d assembled, JR saw OU ballcaps, John Deere ballcaps, a cowboy hat or two, and then he saw Betsy and Phillip Harjo walk in and take seats at the far side of the room. They were Seminole, the only Native people in attendance. JR had known Philip for thirty years. The man was combat veteran, World War II and Korea; he’d been in the Marine division that’d taken Guadalcanal.

Just after seven, Sheriff Bledsoe approached the lectern and informed the audience about the mutilated heifers, then asked JR to speak.

JR and Mary Louise were sitting in the front row of folding chairs and he stood to face the crowd. He didn’t know what to do with his hands, ended up crossing them behind his back, holding his left wrist in his right palm. A panicked thought blossomed in his brain, the notion that the person responsible for carving up his cattle might be seated in this room.

When he was done telling them, the sheriff said, “Thing that struck me, there wasn’t any blood. And I mean not a single drop.”

“Coyotes,” said Johnny Shoemaker from the back of the room, pronouncing the word like a two-syllable slur: ki-oats.

“There weren’t any tracks,” Bledsoe told him. “And I’ve never known coyotes to drink blood.”

Robert Gist raised a hand and the sheriff nodded to him. Gist said, “Did the heifer looked like it’d been scrounged?”

“Well, that’s another thing,” said Bledsoe, “wasn’t none of that. Didn’t even look like the buzzards had been at her.”

“What about the tongue?” Dennis Wisnatt asked.

“Yes,” said Bledsoe, “Mr. Stewart mentioned it’d been cut—but we don’t mean chewed on. Looked like someone had done it with shears.”

Couples began mumbling to each other. JR glanced at Phillip Harjo and thought he saw something come into the man’s eyes, a faraway expression, slight crinkling of his brow. He looked as though he might say something, but he didn’t.

“Now,” said the sheriff, “that was enough to cause me concern, but then this past weekend Mr. Stewart found another one.” He turned to JR. “You mind talking about that?”

“So,” said JR, “this was a little yearling that had been missing a few days. Ended up finding her down by the creek and it was the same sort of deal: left eye, left ear, swatch of hide.”

“And her privates,” added the sheriff. “Whoever done this cut them out like a surgeon and there wasn’t tracks or blood, either one.”

JR saw several women in the audience cross their arms and then Ed Thrasher raised his hand.

“Yessir,” Bledsoe said.

The veterinarian said, “If I could, I’d like to take a look at the body.”

“Well,” said Bledsoe, “here’s the deal: that heifer was in the woods about a mile from the road and it wasn’t no way we could get a pickup in to tump her out. I believe Mr. Stewart buried her.”

“I did,” said JR. “Took me three hours to dig the grave and I had to use a pry bar to lever her into it.”

“It happens again,” said Dr. Thrasher, “I want you to call me.”

JR nodded.

“Now,” said the sheriff, “I didn’t call y’all down here to cause a panic, but me and Mr. Stewart thought if this was happening to him, it might be happening to some of you. If you know anything, I’d sure like to hear it. You don’t want to talk in front of everybody, you can call me at home.”

JR stood beside Bledsoe, watching the crowd. Most of the faces staring at him looked puzzled or uneasy. A few looked disgusted. Only Phillip Harjo looked unsurprised by what he’d heard. He sat there in his OSU ballcap, both hands cradling his left knee. He turned to his wife and whispered something.

The sheriff said, “Anyone had stock go missing?”

Men began to shake their heads and Gerald Buford said, “We do a head count ever morning. We hadn’t had nothing like what you’re talking about.”

Johnny Shoemaker said, “Any sumbitch comes traipsing around my place without a by-your-leave is going to end up with a bad case of lead poisoning. I’ll give him a load of double-ought buck.”

Several men smiled and Lois Shoemaker’s face went red.

Gene McQueen said, “JR, I hate hearing this. That sort of thing would eat me plumb up. Whoever’s behind this ought to be doing a stretch in McAlester, you ask me. There’s a reason ranchers used to make cattle rustlers the guest of honor at a string party.”

Robert Gist said, “Hear, hear.”

“Just awful,” said George Northcutt.

“Terrible,” Ruth Martin said.

“Now,” said the sheriff, “I want y’all to listen at me. I got a herd myownself and I’d be lying if I told you this hasn’t put me off my feed. But that’s no call for anyone to get crossways with the law over it. You see anything out of the ordinary, you call our dispatch. Me or one of my deputies will be there quick as a minnow can swim a dipper. Bad as you might want to, you can’t go shooting somebody over a cow.”

Every man but Phillip Harjo—the only person present who’d ever shot anyone—looked rankled.

“What if they was to come in our house?” Herb Gunter said.

“That’s a different story,” Bledsoe said. “If you’re in your home defending yourself, the law’s behind you and I am too. That’s always been the case. I just don’t want this turning into a corpse and cartridge occasion.”

JR watched the sheriff. Bledsoe seemed to be addressing everyone, but he was staring at Johnny Shoemaker.

“All right then,” Bledsoe said, “that’s all I got for you. Appreciate everybody coming down. Y’all see anything out of fix, you call. Otherwise, have a good evening.”

JR drove down the gravel road at dusk with the season’s last fireflies tracing luminous arcs in the pastures. He’d called Phillip Harjo 30 minutes before, asked if he could stop by, and Harjo had said, “Come see me, yeah.”

The land went rolling out east of JR’s ranch. He topped one hill and descended into the valley beneath, his mind following similar contours, cresting and plunging, the sun setting behind him, blue twilight ahead. He’d half begun to wonder if an oil company wasn’t behind his carved-up cattle, some yack trying to spook him into selling, and the thought made him feel crazy—it was a crazy thought to have. One man alone couldn’t have accomplished all he’d seen, and two or more would’ve left some trace, tire tracks, all manner of sign. He’d considered the possible motivations of his neighbors, weighing each man’s interests until he’d begun to suspect them, every one—which was foolish—and he’d started keeping a pistol on him at all hours, a Dan Wesson .357 revolver; it lay on the bench seat beside him now. He woke at odd hours and peered out the windows of his house.

He’d considered the possible motivations of his neighbors, weighing each man’s interests until he’d begun to suspect them, every one—which was foolish.

He turned south onto a red dirt road that cut through the black oak forest, sagging barbed wire fences on sun-bleached posts, the bar ditches overgrown, limbs hanging above the narrow lane thick enough to make night early.

When he pulled in at a well-kept drive that wound through the cedars, he crossed a cattle-guard, then crossed another, and stopped in front of a two-story cabin. He’d been there before, but never inside. Lifting the column shifter, he pushed it all the way to the left, and then just sat, trying to gather himself. He glanced at the pistol, then hit the glove compartment button, leaned down, and stowed the revolver atop the papers and tire gauges and pairs of needle-nosed pliers. An old pocketknife he’d forgotten. A roll of nickels. When he sat up, he saw that Harjo had stepped out on the porch. The man raised a hand in greeting, and JR opened his door to get out.

They sat at a twin-slab table beside a large window that looked out into the woods. JR thought the cabin was a jim-dandy—more lodge than ranch house—with walls of lacquered pine and cedar crossbeams above. Mounted deer heads. Calfskin rugs. An upright piano in the living room and the entire house lit by electric lamps in walls sconces that resembled the old kerosene ones in the shotgun shanty he’d grown up in. Seminole was a boomtown then, the streets a mud quagmire, wooden derricks like a ghastly forest, far as the eye could see.

Betsy Harjo served them coffee and fried pies. Her blue-black hair was parted in the center and worn in long braids down her back. She had dark, dazzling eyes that stared out from a face that must have been older than it looked. JR thought she could’ve been any age between thirty and fifty-five—it was hard to say. She asked after Mary Louise and then about their son in Oklahoma City and then she nodded at her husband and went upstairs.

The two of them talked for a while about the assassination attempt on President Ford the previous week and then they talked about Patty Hearst who’d been arrested in San Francisco. When JR finished his coffee, he looked at Harjo and asked what he’d made of the meeting on Friday.

“Oh,” Harjo said, “that was something. John Shoemaker’s kind of funny, enit?”

“He’s worse than that,” JR said, and a few silent moments passed. A crow cawed from out in the night. He could just hear the muffled sound of a pumpjack engine, a faint, muted chug.

He said, “Phillip, it sort of seemed to me like you might’ve had some thoughts on what all’s been happening over at my place. Understand you not wanting to air your lungs in public, but I’d appreciate listening to anything you’d have to say.”

Harjo sipped his coffee, turned his head and glanced out the window where their reflections hung in the glass. Then he looked at JR and said, “Everyone talking about coyotes and outlaws. Gerald, I think it was? He wouldn’t know a bandit from a bull’s foot.”

“Have to agree with you there,” JR said. He picked a piece of crust off his plate and put it in his mouth, chewing slowly before speaking again. “I ain’t discussed this outside the family, but I’ve had a dozen oil companies try to buy me out so they could come in and drill. Mary’s wanted me to sell for a few years now and move us into town. Appreciate you not telling that around.”

“I don’t talk other people’s business,” Harjo said.

“I know you don’t. I’m just saying.”

“You able to turn a profit?” Harjo asked. “It wasn’t for these wells of mine, I wouldn’t have any cows at all.”

JR shook his head and exhaled a long breath. “I’ve lost a thousand dollars a year on my herd, but the ranch has been in the family since 1911. I hoped to pass it on to my boy, but he don’t care nothing about cattle. Can’t say I blame him. Sure ain’t no money in it. But I’d hate to see it go to some petroleum company. It’s Stewart land.”

Harjo was watching him with his calm, steady eyes. He said, “Reckon whose it was before?”

“Beg pardon?” JR said.

“Before the Rush, it was our land. Seminole land.”

“Well,” said JR, “I don’t mean to get into all that.”

“Why’s that?”

“I just don’t see it pertains.”

“No?” said Harjo.

“No,” said JR.

Harjo leaned back in his chair. “Since I was young,” he said, “I’ve heard our elders speak about these matters. There is a good deal of bitterness, you understand. They call your people chiselers. I would not say so. You had the property from your father and your father had it from his. But now a terrible thing has happened and you feel some great affliction.” He looked at JR. “This is how the Seminole have felt for generations.”

JR stared at the crumbs on his plate. “I don’t see how that helps.”

Harjo leaned forward and braced his forearms against the table’s edge. He said, “You own your mineral rights?”

“Surface and mineral,” JR said.

“What’s your acreage?”

“Six hundred and forty.”

“Whole section.”

“Whole section,” JR said.

Harjo glanced up at the ceiling, as if calculating figures in his head. Then he looked at JR. “I would buy it,” he said.

JR had heard him just fine, but he was so stunned he asked Harjo to come again.

“Your place,” said Harjo. “I would buy it from you.”

JR felt like he’d been splashed with hot water, anger scalding his face. Yes, I see, he thought. I can see it now.

He pushed his chair back and stood.

“Mr. Harjo,” he said, “I thank you for your time. You tell Miss Betsy I appreciate the refreshments.”

He crossed the room without waiting for a response, a kind of electricity coursing through him, the air all but crackling with it, and he’d just placed his hand on the doorknob when he heard Harjo say, “You think about it, yeah?”

JR opened the door and stepped out.

But JR didn’t see how Harjo could’ve carved up his cattle. He’d suspected so many culprits it drove him distracted. Probably, the smart thing would be to contact the OSBI, but when he called Bledsoe to float the idea, the sheriff said, “We could do that. We certainly could. But you really want the State Bureau poking around your property?”

“What about the Feds?” JR asked.

Bledsoe snorted. He said, “Them ole boys couldn’t drive nails in a snow bank. I wouldn’t let them step foot on my place.”

By the time he hung up the phone, he was wondering if the sheriff was involved, though that went against everything he’d ever known about Jack Bledsoe.

He’d heard folks talk about paranoia, but he’d never felt it until now: a chill behind your breastbone, wouldn’t seem to thaw. His people had come out of Howell County, Missouri; before that, Tennessee—Appalachian hill-folk, a long line of Scots-Irish bootleggers, long riders, barroom brawlers. They were fractious, short-tempered, at times. Certainly clannish. But not exactly paranoid. It was just good sense to assume anyone who wasn’t family was trying to fix your flint.

He wasn’t thinking clearly, wasn’t really sleeping. When he managed to drift off, he’d dream of a forest glade festooned with cattle teeth, a floor of white incisors. He dreamt of a boneyard pasture and a black sun in a scarlet sky or an owl on a low branch with a needle in its human hands.

Every morning, he did a head count of his beef and show cattle, and he did another in the afternoon. His Angus cows had always been a bit skeersome, but his Brahmans were little more than pets. He’d thread his way among the silver bodies, touching each blue-gray hump. He felt like he was going a little mad. One night at the supper table, Mary Louise looked over at him and said, “Why, JR.”

She was pointing at his plate with the tines of the fork she held, and he glanced down to see that he’d picked the bones out of the chicken wings he’d been eating and arranged them atop his mashed potatoes like a cairn.

Then he woke one morning from a dream he couldn’t recall and heard rain lashing the side of the house. Mary Louise was still asleep in the bed beside him, her face slack and her lips parted, her bosom rising and falling, rising and falling.

He stood at the window watching the gray sheets of rain. It was a real toad-strangler; he could hardly see twenty yards. He dressed and went in the kitchen to make coffee and by the time he’d sat down, the rain had stopped. He pulled on his rubber boots, tucked his jeans into the leg covers and went to do his morning count.

The Brahmans were under the eaves of the cowshed he’d built just outside the yard. His chow dogs were whining and pawing the fence, and he let down the tailgate of the truck for them to hop into the bed, then drove up to the hay barn in the west pasture where his Angus and Black Baldies would gather during a storm. He parked in the bay and did his count, came up one short, did the count again, and then a third time. One of the Angus steers was missing.

He couldn’t drive to the south pasture without the pickup bogging down, and by the time he got back to the house, a soft drizzle had begun to fall. He went inside to get his slicker.

Mary Louise wasn’t in the kitchen and she wasn’t in the living room and when he walked down the hall to their bedroom, the bed was made and all the pillows arranged against the headboard. He opened the closet and got his slicker from its hanger, then went back up the hallway and poked his head out into the garage: her car was sitting right there.

He stood in the living room numbly. Drops of rain beaded the windows.

“Momma,” he called, “you in here?” He listened to his voice Doppler along the wood-paneled walls. He walked down the hall and went upstairs.

The guest bathroom was empty, as was Jonathan’s old room. He knocked on the door of Mary Louise’s sewing room, then opened it and stepped inside. Without knowing why, he closed the door behind him and stood in the center of the room.

She enjoyed working in here because of the light from the south-facing windows. Her dress mannequin was in the corner—a headless torso on a walnut stand—and her antique sewing machine sat on its mahogany table against the wall. She’d been after him for a new electric model, but he liked that she did things the old way. The noise of the foot treadle was a comfort to him.

He heard a door slam downstairs, and he was about to walk out when, outside, Gretchen and Moses began to howl. He stepped over to the window. Water dripped from the eaves and through the light screen of rain he saw the dogs standing at the fence that enclosed the yard, ears back and hackles raised, rucking up a chorus. Out in the pasture, not fifty yards away, the Angus steer lay on its belly in a rumpled patch of bluestem, its legs bent at crazy angles, as if it had been dropped from a great height. From the bridge of its nose all the way around its lower jaw, a circle of the black hide had been sheared away.

He stood there, watching, trying to ignore the howling. Nothing he’d done, no one he’d spoken to, had brought him any closer to an answer, and suddenly he knew this would keep happening until his entire herd was gone. Turning, his eye fell on the sewing dummy again. The charcoal-colored dress Mary Louise was making hung over the torso like loose flaps of flesh and he saw how perfect the joinery, how precise the cuts. He stepped over and fingered the cloth. On a small table, beside bolts of fabric, lay a set of stainless steel X-ACTO knives. He glanced out the window at the mutilated steer, then back at the dummy, and the hair rose along his forearms. His heart began hammering against the thin wall of his chest and he could hear blood rushing in his ears.

Ain’t no way, he thought. Little woman, wife and mother, no more hurt in her than a sparrow. Georgie on her bosom in the hospital not three hours old and her face lit up like a sunbeam. She’d held him just the same after he went through that windshield down in Bowlegs, summer of ’62, had changed out his bedpan for two weeks while he was laid up, never once crinkled her nose. Thirty years and hadn’t asked for anything but some cash for the sewing store or not to have to sit around on a failing farm while he—

He looked out the window and he could see Mary Louise’s face that day in the south pasture, calm as a millpond. Wouldn’t listen to him. Wanted to see for herself.

Go around playing cowboy.

He stared at the bolt of fabric on her worktable, the cuts so clean.

“Ain’t no way,” he whispered, as if speaking the words would make them true.

A man makes decisions about what to believe and he makes decisions about what he won’t. He would auction off the herd, sell his ranch to Harjo or one of the oilmen, whoever made the best offer. His grandfather was a cattleman, his father too, but his days of raising cattle were over. He could stand knowing someone was dismembering his stock. He could stand suspecting his friends, his neighbors, even the sheriff. But his wife of thirty years? That was the last feather.

He heard Mary Louise on the stairs. “Daddy,” she called, “are you up here?”

That was a good question, he thought. All he’d wanted was to figure out what was happening to his cows, but now he decided he didn’t need to know. Wasn’t going to think about that anymore, wasn’t going to do it.

JR turned from the window and started across the room.

“Yes,” he said, and his voice sounded strange to him. He reached for the knob and opened the door.

Rickey Fayne and Carrie R. Moore on Writing the Blackness of the South

Posted on August 11, 2025August 7, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

Fiction often involves movement—in both the literal and figurative sense. The reader, accumulating pages, follows a character’s emotional and physical journey. The writer, accumulating drafts, goes in search of an elusive answer to a difficult question. For us—Rickey Fayne and Carrie R. Moore—fiction pays homage to places left and longed for, especially when it comes to the South.

In the winter of 2021, I met Rickey at the Michener Center for Writers. Like so many of our peers, I felt shaken by the pandemic, taking classes on Zoom and trying to write without the in-person communities MFAs often promise. Then– Rickey’s manuscript appeared in workshop. It reimagined the story of the Devil, who in Rickey’s telling, received a deal from Jesus: free Black folk from legacies of slavery and earn the chance to reenter heaven. Rickey’s pages were soulful, relentlessly honest, full of profound grace. I read as the Devil pursued generations of the Laurent family, offering each descendant a shaky salvation in the hopes of earning freedom for them both. Rickey’s work reminded me of home, of the South as I knew it. He was writing the way I hoped to, which is to say, he was complicating the people and places I loved. For years after that class, we traded work before we ever met in person. Now, his manuscript has become the novel The Devil Three Times, which was released May 13 by Little, Brown.

– Carrie R. Moore

I first encountered Carrie’s writing in a novel writing workshop. She shared a draft of her novel about two teens’ troubled relationship to their home, an all-black town known the world over for their stained glass. I tore through it in half a day in awe of Carrie’s prose. Her descriptions were rich, evocative, and kinetic. But what I was most taken with was the deep sense of place, the way this town felt alive. She’d written a book that catered to my readerly tastes. I feel the same about her debut short story collection Make Your Way Home, out from Tin House July 15^th. Here, Carrie turns her attention to real places all throughout the South, delving into their histories, and peopling them with characters as tangible as anyone you might meet out on the street. I am beyond thrilled that her writing is finally out in the world.

– Rickey Fayne

Now, in the summer of our debuts, we decided to interview each other about how we arrived at our characters, the complexities of desires, and getting back home.

Carrie R. Moore: The Devil Three Times is so daring with its religious references (to this practicing Christian, in particular!). I’m floored by the amount of complexity it affords the Devil. He’s unsettling, and at the same time, I have a deep empathy for your version of him. Was there anything that pursued you as you wrote the novel? Something you just couldn’t shake until you’d gotten it right on the page?

Rickey Fayne: I was terrified of the Devil when I was kid. One of the things that separates the Black church from mainstream Christianity is the emphasis on immanence over transcendence. It’s as if the figures in the Bible are still living and you might one day encounter them in the world. I thought that one day I was going to turn the corner and he was going to be there waiting with a bargain for my soul too good to refuse. I could feel the shame that would be visited upon me when that happened. Part of my motivation for writing the Devil in this way was to pay homage to this attribute of Black religion and to find a way to forgive myself for not being perfect. I think a lot of people who grew up in the church were made to feel guilt for actions both real and imagined. If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, what hope do any of us have? None. But, if there’s hope for the Devil, there’s hope for everyone.

CRM: I definitely feel that sensation in your novel, especially the sense of shame that affects so many of the characters, whether they struggle with addiction, passing, or desire for the wrong person. And of course, there’s the Devil’s shame in his separation from God. It’s hard not to feel shame when being imperfect has such a cost, when you’ve been shunned or kicked out of someplace meaningful, like heaven in the Devil’s case.

RF: Where do your own characters come from? Do you see or hear them first, or do you start with a situation and allow that to give rise to them?

CRM: They come from emotional extremes. Much of Make Your Way Home arose from my own inner turmoil, from moments when I felt like I was struggling with multiple ways of being. In my twenties, I wouldn’t just feel anger or disappointment or acute self-awareness. I would almost watch myself having those emotions and try to suppress them, as if that would afford me safety or control. I remember a specific instance where a former friend of mine said something deeply disappointing and hurtful about Black women’s desirability. Half of me felt a profound, unshakable anger. But the other half was aware of how easily people perceive Black women as angry, and this was the half that wanted to project some more positive emotion, even if my rage was justified and pretending otherwise wore me out.

I gave those internal conflicts to my characters. Cherie in “Naturale” has my anger. Claire in “How Does Your Garden Grow?” has my fear of trusting others. Damonia in “Gather Here Again” has my simultaneous hope and apathy for a better future in this country. Every character is born from one emotion or another that I’ve wrestled with late into the night. It’s not that I see or hear my characters, but I feel them, if that makes sense. Hopefully, that doesn’t sound crazy.

If there’s hope for the Devil, there’s hope for everyone.
Rickey Fayne

RF: It most certainly doesn’t. I know exactly what you mean. I think this is what Du Bois was trying to get at with his talk of double-consciousness, the “seeing one’s self through the eyes of another” of it all. But, more often than not, we spend so much time worrying about the “double” that we forget consciousness. Which is why I love your stories so much. You’re mapping out the inner life of Black feeling over the Southern landscape and working toward a deeper understanding of what unites us as Black Southerners outside the experience of race and it’s a joy to behold.

CRM: I deeply appreciate that. How do your characters come to you?

RF: It’s similar for me. I think of many of the characters in The Devil Three Times as versions of myself that might have existed if time and circumstance had had something else to say. All of them have something of my own feeling and experience. Reverend Walter’s eulogy for Lucille, his mother, is something akin to what I might have said if I’d had it in me to stand up at my own father’s funeral. Lucy’s having to choose between her art and her familial obligations mirrors how I felt when I looked up and realized that I’d spent the last few years of my grandparents lives on a dissertation only a handful of people would ever read. I don’t know that I was aware of these connections as I was writing but, once they were down, and I was able to look back over them they were disconcertingly obvious.

CRM: I can feel that realness in your characters. My favorite writers put their distress and unanswerable questions in their work.

RF: Speaking of unanswerable questions, I’m curious about what first compelled you to write about the South. In each of your stories, even before I’m told where I am, I can feel the South in the logic of thought, the rendering of image, the rhythm of speech. Then, once I’m pulled into the story, I see it in the presentness of the past and the problems your characters face. Why do you turn to the South over and over again?

CRM: I’m deeply interested in uncomfortable intimacies, in moments where you get so close that you can’t ignore a truth that makes you flinch. I was born and raised in the Atlanta area, which means the South has many warm memories for me. It’s where I ate tomatoes from my aunt’s garden and grew up alongside my cousins and first realized how easy it was to drive and suddenly end up in the mountains or at the beach. I have a deep love for the places and people that made me. And at the same time, I can’t ignore the way the South has been romanticized: moonlight and magnolias, the plantation wedding, the glamorization of the Confederacy. While conducting research for this collection, there were many times when I would encounter some law or historical event that absolutely horrified me, that was worse than anything I could’ve imagined. At their core, the stories in the collection are love stories—but they have to be honest. I write about the Black South again and again because I want to get that balance right. I’m always trying to make sense of the relationship between past and present.

Did you feel something similar while writing The Devil Three Times? My approach was to include as many stories as I could within the collection, but I can’t help but notice what the scope of your novel allows you to do in terms of time and its impact on the Laurent family.

RF: I did. What the past means for the present is always at the forefront of my mind when I write. At the same time, one of the most important revelations for me as a reader was that people throughout human history have largely worried about and wanted the same sorts of things. I wanted to show how historical forces inflect the worries and wants of one family over the course of hundreds of years. So although the external pressures bearing down on the characters toward the end of the book look very different from what their ancestors faced during slavery, emancipation, Reconstruction, and the Civil Rights era, internally they are all going through the same sorts of things. We used to sit around eating whole tomatoes fresh from the garden too, sprinkling salt onto them as we went, and I like to imagine our ancestors, no matter how bad things were, found time to do the same.

CRM: So true. With the first of my stories in the collection, “When We Go, We Go Downstream,” that feeling was the only way I could even begin to write characters who were enslaved, since there’s so much potential for a failure of research and imagination. What I wanted most was to capture my characters’ central human experiences. Even if liberation was the goal, I kept wondering about the small ways they’d try to take care of themselves, their inclinations toward family, the loves they would have craved. I kept seeking their interior lives. For many of the characters in the collection, actually, that became different forms of love and connecting with another person.

RF: It’s so interesting that you cite love as the unifying factor of your collection. I hadn’t thought about it in that way before but I definitely see it. I’m curious about this idea of uncomfortable intimacy, when I hear the term, I can’t help but think of the interpersonal dynamics in your stories, particularly “All Skin is Clothing,” where the younger brother sees his older sister as an extension of himself, or “Cottonmouths,” where the mother and daughter share pregnancies—that last scene where the daughter pours her mother tea gave me chills. Can you say more about what drew you to explore that kind of relationship? Is it still love when it goes that far? Or does it become something else?

CRM: My characters are looking for love in its best sense—what they want is for someone to know them for the entirety of who they are, to make space for their joys and hurts and vulnerabilities. Complete safety, in other words. And still that’s one-sided. They haven’t yet learned love as an act of service or, more specifically, how to give and receive care at the same time. The younger brother character in “All Skin is Clothing” is so emotionally wounded by experiencing gunfire that he sees his sister as a refuge. He’s right to. He’s a child who’s been through a harrowing experience. The same is true of Twyla in “Cottonmouths.” She only wants to be close to her mother as her pregnancy thrusts her into early womanhood. I’m always interested in how our needs—even when justified—can unsettle other people or become burdensome. I’m writing about how you get so close to another person through a continuous process of sharing and asking—until they get weary and have to take a step back. I’m interested in love as work.

RF: That’s interesting, I was more interested in what desire does to a person. At some point in my education, I was introduced to Lacan’s idea that desire is lack. But this idea is kind of reductive. In grad school, I encountered the work of Deleuze and Guattari and found more to grasp in their idea that desire is a productive force, the only means by which one entity may strive to become other than what it is. Lack presupposes a state of perfection to which one might return, whereas “becoming” is an open-ended process that could, potentially, lead to heretofore unimagined possibilities.

CRM: I love that. Whenever I write something that verges on the romantic, I’m always thinking about what that love—or perhaps desire—will mean to those characters, even outside the particular relationship.

RF: Exactly, we all have a story we tell ourselves about who we are, what we value, and what our limits are. After you develop intense feelings for someone else, your grip on the narrative slackens. Desire allows you to imagine alternative ways of being, to see life with fresh eyes and know that they’re capable of more. This sort of change can be positive or negative. For James—one of the few characters in the book who comes to understand that love is work—these intense feelings help him realize that he can do difficult things. For Porter, James’s brother, the after-effect of desire is the realization that he can leave all his problems behind.

CRM: Your characters’ personal relationships to desire—and its dark side—is one of the most intriguing elements to track throughout the Laurent family’s generations. Without giving too much away, some of the characters—such as Asa and Louis—initially lust after people who aren’t “technically” blood relatives, though this soon changes over the generations. Eventually, the limit stretches, until what counts as “sin” becomes particular to each character. Even then, what matters more is how they think of themselves in the wake of their actions. It’s astonishing.

RF: I’m thinking now about the title of your collection, Make Your Way Home, the epigraph from Jesmyn Ward, and something you said once about leaving the South, seeing it for what it was and is, and then returning. Did you know before you started writing what you wanted to write about all this or did you have to get it all down first to understand it?

I can’t ignore the way the South has been romanticized: moonlight and magnolias, the plantation wedding, the glamorization of the Confederacy.
Carrie R. Moore

CRM: I didn’t know, at first. I only knew I wanted to write about how multi-faceted the South really is, in terms of Black cultures and geographies. Much later, I realized I was writing about creating a home in a hostile environment, whether that hostility involved political and historical forces or interpersonal relationships. If I were to guess, based on how well I got to know you and your work during our time in our MFA, I’d imagine that’s true for you too.

The last word in my story collection was always “back.” Tell me, how did you arrive at the last word of your novel: “home”?

RF: When I was living at home, all I thought about was how much I wanted to get away. It wasn’t until I left that I realized what that place meant for me. I grew up at the intersection of Fayne Rd and Fayne Ln on land my family has lived on for almost two hundred years. By the time I came along it was filled with people who loved and wanted nothing but the best for me but, by the time I finally realized this, most of what made home home—my grandparents, my aunts, uncles, and cousins,—was gone. That is part of how I identify with the Devil. He didn’t realize Heaven was paradise until he left and by then it was too late to go back. Of course, I didn’t see any of this until I was several drafts in, which is when I wrote that last section. It came to me fully formed, all at once and it wasn’t until after I typed that last word that everything clicked.

CRM: My story is the same as yours. I grew up in Georgia, then began college in California, where I thought my life would begin. I wanted to make movies, then write novels. From there, the South called out to me. It kept showing up in my work.

But I think writing allows for that. If it can’t return you home, it can get you close.

The Cultural and Political Obsession With Trans People Is Harming My Community

Posted on August 8, 2025August 6, 2025 by EL Assistant2

In the early aughts—when I was in high school—my friends and I often chose Claire’s as our meetup location at the mall. We perused the accessories and sometimes could even afford to buy a trendy charm bracelet or puka shell necklace. One humid summer night in Cleveland, a copper arm band caught my eye. It was the kind of thing I imagined Cleopatra might have worn, curled several times around the upper arm, each end adorned with the ruby-eyed head of a snake. The ornament looked out of place hanging from a shelf in Claire’s, as out of place as I felt standing there in a polo shirt and loose cargo shorts, gawking at it. I tried it on, walking around the store, glancing in every mirror. My friends were running late. After a few minutes I stood in front of where I’d found it, considering if I’d really wear it if I purchased it.

“It’s fine for you to try that on as long as you don’t buy it.” A saleswoman had crept up behind me. She was Black, with graying hair pulled back into a tight bun, and she wore stockings, and the sensible, kitten-heeled shoes of a woman who never missed her Sunday church service. I didn’t know her, and yet I knew her very well.

“I’m sorry?”

“You wouldn’t actually buy that. You’re not a girl; it’s not for you.”

She had clocked me.

“No, ma’am, I guess not.”

I typically felt invisible, but with one glance, one comment, this woman let me know that she could see me for what I was—and what I wasn’t.

I placed the arm band into her outstretched hand and rushed from the store, my eyes lowered to the ground as I frantically texted my friends to meet me elsewhere. I was angry and embarrassed, but mostly I felt exposed. I’d been standing by myself in a store meant for teenage girls in a suburban mall in middle America. I typically felt invisible, but with one glance, one comment, this woman let me know that she could see me for what I was—and what I wasn’t.

A year later, a friend and I visited a different mall, a fancier mall, one that didn’t even have a Claire’s. We walked around, he and I, deep in conversation about sexual identity and stereotypes, when he asked me quite calmly, if I had ever considered the idea that I might actually be a girl—one who’d simply been born into the wrong body.

I considered his question. His tone was gentle, but his query was sharp, pointed, and it lodged itself inside of me. I was aware of their existence—because of the T in the acronym LGBT, and because I’d seen episodes of The Nanny and Will and Grace—but trans people had always been, to me, more theoretical than real.

Being “trans” seemed an unthinkable way to move through the world. I was already Black, and gay, and the son of a well-known Baptist minister. I was a high-school senior who had somehow managed to survive at a deeply conservative all boys prep school. Soon I would be a freshman at a progressive liberal arts college outside Philadelphia. I had worked hard in school, convinced that leaving Cleveland and never looking back was the only answer if I wanted to live my best Black queer life. This college—a campus where The Princeton Review said it was easier to come out as queer than as a Republican—was my reward. I wanted to step into the freedom of the real world, and distance myself from the context in which I was raised. I was not looking for further marginalization.

I told my friend that I was not transgender, but his question punctured me like a bullet that wouldn’t, or couldn’t, be removed.

I first had the idea for an essay series centering trans and gender non-conforming writers of color in the fall of 2021. I had recently been named the Editor-in-chief of Electric Literature, a groundbreaking digital literary magazine with an annual readership of more than 3 million. A few months earlier, I’d publicly disclosed my identity as a trans woman, something I’d been preparing to do for two years in response to a question I’d been asking myself for sixteen. When I was named to this new role, I was widely celebrated as the first Black, openly transgender woman to helm a major literary publication.

Around this time, the comedian Dave Chappelle released a new Netflix special, The Closer, in which he pitted the Black community and the LGBTQ community against each other, arguing that queer white people are better off in contemporary American society than Black people and often participate in the racist marginalization of Black people. The role played by different marginalized groups in each other’s oppression deserves a richly considered and nuanced conversation, but instead, Chappelle completely erased the existence of those who live at the intersection of Black and queer identities.

Around this same time, Chimamanda Ngozie Adichie published an essay which doubled down on an evasive response she gave when asked whether or not a trans woman is a woman: “…My feeling is that trans women are trans women.” This puzzled me. As a woman who claims to be in alliance with the LGBTQ+ community, her choice to write the essay felt like an intentional anti-trans dog whistle to her global army of supporters, many of whom are self-identified terfs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists).

For all the dialogue surrounding trans identity, the loudest voices in this conversation were never trans people, and in particular, never trans people of color.

But Chappelle infuriated me. The popularity of his special, and the conversation it ignited, remained a major talking point in news media for weeks. Netflix defended the special, resulting in a walkout by their trans employees. Over weeks of social media and news media discourse, what I noticed was this: for all the dialogue surrounding trans identity, the loudest voices in this conversation were never trans people, and in particular, never trans people of color. We were the existential center of a cultural boiling point—and our voices were almost nowhere to be found.

From my fury was born Both/And, a series of fifteen essays published online by Electric Literature, with the goal of elevating emerging trans and gender nonconforming writers of color to a national literary platform. But there was one key distinction—these writers would have the unique opportunity to be edited by a trans writer of color. Electric Literature quickly fundraised to support the series, meeting and then exceeding our goal in just one week, proving that writers and readers alike were hungry for these essays. The popularity of the series, which was published on electricliterature.com in 2023, as well as the ever-growing far-right political targeting of the LGBTQ+ community, further proves how necessary these essays are.

A few nights ago, Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election, during which Republicans spent hundreds of millions of dollars on anti-trans ads. As I watched the results, my heart fell from my chest. I knew what was coming, and predictably, less than twelve hours later, I tuned into morning shows where I saw political pundits—from both parties—blaming the trans community for the election results. Early analysis saw folks saying that the Democratic party was out of touch with the majority of American voters, that it was too woke, that American families didn’t want grown men playing sports against little girls. The absurdity of that statement aside, I kept thinking to myself, But I’m an American voter, too.

What followed was a profound sense of displacement, politically speaking. While my values are progressive, I have always been a voter motivated by pragmatism and harm reduction. I was raised in a Black, middle class family of churchgoers by parents born between the silent and the baby boomer generations. I was raised to vote in every election. And I was raised to vote without attaching a grave sense of preciousness to that vote. It wasn’t necessary to agree with everything my chosen political candidate said, in part because voting wasn’t supposed to be the sum of my political engagement. It was a chess move, a means to an end, and it was the bare minimum. More simply put, I have always been a registered voter, and I have always voted for the Democratic ticket. Given my values, this means I have also, always, held a deep sense of frustration at the party’s continued pursuit of moderate white voters.

I have always worried that when it comes to policy, measures that affirmed and protected my existence would end up on the chopping block.

Being Black, and being queer, I have always worried that when it comes to policy, measures that affirmed and protected my existence would end up on the chopping block. And very often, that’s exactly what happened. But in recent years, public opinion has shifted. Marriage equality, for instance, has been legal for nearly a decade, and folks have largely realized that their heterosexual marriages were never in danger. Perhaps it was the optimism of youth, or the stability of democracy, but I never looked into the future fearing what it held for me, or my community. When faced with the possibility of a rebooted Trump administration, I felt strongly that Kamala Harris needed to win if I was to maintain any sense of safety.

Whenever progress is made, there’s corresponding backlash. Right now we live in a time of unprecedented targeting against the LGBTQ+ community, and yet we stand on the precipice of an even darker era. Being a writer, I turn to literature in times of darkness—the writing of it, and more importantly, the reading of it. In the face of a political class that, at best, hesitates to stand beside us, and at worst works to bring about our ruin, I introduce you to the brilliant writers in this anthology, all of whom live at the fraught intersection of race and gender identity.

Each of these essays is a wonder, something taken from the heart of its writer and flung, with delicious abandon, into this world. Each essay leaves an imprint, promising to reverberate inside the reader. There is Akwaeke Emezi, who meditates on what it means to be beautiful across gender, and Tanaïs, who writes about the fantasy of making feverish love to another femme, to mark the occasion of a landmark birthday. Meredith Talusan remembers a casual hookup that awakened the woman within, and Gabrielle Bellot travels to Hawaii with her wife, where the eruption of a volcano inspires her inner goddess. These are just a handful of the essays that turn their gaze inward, and backward, straddling—and sometimes weaving—what it means to be man or woman, masc or femme.

There are also essays that turn their gaze fearlessly forward, conjuring the sort of tender, loving future we so rarely get to live. Zeyn Joukhadar considers what it means to be part of a future their ancestors never lived to see. Kaia Ball dreams about their estranged father coming out as trans, and finding a way to accept them. Jonah Wu brings the reader along as he jumps from the proverbial cliff into the world of hormone replacement therapy, embracing a more masculine future. And A.L. Major considers the cost of creating the life, and family, of their choosing.

Historically, trans people have been forced to imagine, or conjure, representation of ourselves into existing narratives that never sought to include us, often using the stories and fictional lives of canonically cishet characters as foundations for possible trans stories. Both/And is unabashed in its portrayal of the fullness of our lives. These essays consider imagination and fantasy as real-world liberation, the heightened visibility and invisibility of trans bodies, trans joy, laughter and love, and trans rage, revenge, and loss.

My community is under vicious attack on every level, but we refuse to disappear, and I refuse to allow our stories, and our lives, to be erased.

At Electric Literature, we believe that literature has the power to shape public consciousness. Storytelling breaks down barriers in numerous ways; perhaps the most powerful being the building of empathy. My community is under vicious attack on every level, but we refuse to disappear, and I refuse to allow our stories, and our lives, to be erased. The time is now for trans and gender nonconforming writers of color to amplify our own voices on our own terms. While the culture is obsessed with us, that obsession has been weaponized in an effort to legislate us out of existence. But it simply won’t work because we’re already here. We’ve been here, telling our stories in our own words, our voices rising to the rafters, ringing so loud that we’re impossible to ignore.

7 Novels That Prove Writers Can Make the Best Protagonists

Posted on August 8, 2025August 6, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

We’ve all heard the groaning, whether in reviews, in books and articles, or on social media: The writer-protagonist is out of touch, navel gazing, insular, unimaginative…The critiques go on and on. These days, any book that features a writer as the main character seems to face this blanket assessment before the spine in question has even been cracked.

Sometimes the critique is valid, but I’d argue that we also need protagonists who are writers, that some stories can only be told through a writer. The writer-protagonist in a novel might be the engine of the book, its central obsession. Or they might be used as a frame that expands the world of the central story. Or they could be a single brushstroke at the end that changes what you’ve just read. To me, the possibilities seem almost endless, and each writer-protagonist offers nuance to the elements of fiction.

My debut novel, Atomic Hearts, is about a writer. The book follows Gertie at two points in her life. In the first, she’s sixteen and spending a secret-filled summer in Sioux Falls with her father, who is struggling with an opioid addiction. She finds escape in the pages of a fantasy novel she’s trying to write, about a girl transported to another world. In the second, when Gertie is thirty-one, we find her trying to find a way, through her novel-in-progress, to reconcile herself with that fateful summer. Teenage Gertie struggles with the ever-darker worlds of her life and her fantasy novel, while adult Gertie’s rejection of fantasy becomes a barrier to inspiration. But it’s through Gertie’s writing that she learns, in different ways, to define what’s real, what’s imagined, and to know when the boundary between the two should be blurred. The books on this list—and many others that fit this theme—were an inspiration to me as I wrote Atomic Hearts. They loom large in my imagination, showing why, and how, writer-protagonists can dispel common knee-jerk reactions to become a tool of versatility in a novel.

Mind of Winter by Laura Kasischke

On Christmas morning in Mind of Winter, Holly Judge wakes up with the scrap of a line of a poem in her head. She feels, for the first time in years, a physical urge to write. From there, a single snowy day unfolds in a nightmarish spiral as Holly moves from room to room preparing for the arrival of company, searching for the time to write, and wondering at her daughter’s increasingly odd behavior. The book’s ending changes everything, but it’s Holly’s internal musings about poetry and the sense that there is an invisible, physical forcefield keeping Holly from sitting down to work on a poem that make the story vibrate with an odd electricity. That Holly is a poet becomes a tool of mystery in the novel. We feel her muscles twitching toward a pen, but she never quite gets there. It’s discomfort (in a good way) from beginning to end.

All My Puny Sorrows by Miriam Toews

As Yoli’s sister Elf tries again and again to die, Yoli is trying to write “the real book.” Yoli, best known for her Rodeo Rhonda series, is in financial straits after her latest divorce, and meanwhile Elf begs to be taken to Switzerland—a place where she’d have the right to die. As Yoli’s resistance to Elf’s idea deteriorates, she starts to wonder how she might pay for such a trip. The answer is to furiously, in a span of days, write another installment of Rodeo Rhonda. All My Puny Sorrows is of course about so much more than the economics of writing, but Yoli’s financial maneuvering—in a way, to save her sister by helping her kill herself—is a devastating, unglamorous, desperate look at the writing life as a means to make money for ourselves and our families.

Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler

The year in which Parable of the Sower begins (2024) has come and gone, but its message and predictions are increasingly true. Lauren Oya Olamina, the novel’s first-person protagonist, lives in a walled neighborhood outside of Los Angeles and imagines a philosophy that defines God as Change, which she eventually calls Earthseed: The Books of the Living. Passages from Earthseed frame each chapter, but the novel is also told through Lauren’s journal entries. Lauren also suffers from hyperempathy, a disorder where she feels the physical pain of those near her—which is fitting, for a writer of philosophy, to experience so closely the feelings of others. Following the devastation of Lauren’s neighborhood, she heads north with a group of survivors—and she brings her belief system, which reshapes not just the post-apocalyptic world she lives in but also the idea of God and faith. The blend of formal philosophy and personal writing connects us intimately to Lauren while expanding our view of what survival really means. Parable of the Sower shows how hope begins with words, and how one can transform words into change.

Red Pill by Hari Kunzru

The narrator of Red Pill leaves his family in New York for a three-month residency at the Deuter Center in Germany, ostensibly to work on a project called “The Lyric I”—but he realizes soon that he has no interest in working on this project; in his words, he just “wanted a break.” So, instead of writing, he binges a cop show called Blue Lives alone in his room—which is antithetical to the Deuter Center’s philosophy of communal work spaces. As he binges, he comes to feel his writing is meaningless, and he grows increasingly paranoid that someone is watching him. When by chance he meets the creator of Blue Lives, Anton, he’s certain that Anton is “red-pilling” his viewers. The narrator also feels he’s meant to expose Anton and save the world from Anton’s alt-right worldview. Is the narrator insane, or is what he fears true? Is it possible to know the difference in a world driven by madness? (Adding to the nightmare is the fact the Deuter Center is located across a lake from the villa where the Final Solution was planned.) But threading through Red Pill’s grim, triumphless plot is an autofictional layer: It’s not just the story of a writer; it’s a story the narrator is writing down for us, the readers. Though relentless in its study of our political danger, Red Pill still holds on to the idea that through writing we can try to tell our stories, even if the madness of the world feels both like it’s been with us forever and like it’s just getting started.

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell

Fangirl starts on Cath’s first day of college at the University of Nebraska, but we learn that for years she’s been writing fanfiction online for a wizard series under the name Magicath. Many readers are likely drawn to this YA book for the romance between Cath and her roommate’s ex-boyfriend, Levi, but what I loved was the way storytelling, for Cath, plays crucially into her formation of self as she takes her first steps into adulthood. Cath clings to the idea she can keep writing her fanfiction, even as her college fiction class—and, more and more, her own identity as a writer—encourage her to expand into her own imagination. Fangirl is by no means a perfect novel—fears (and jokes about) sexual assault by random strangers on a dark sidewalk are so exaggerated they end up making the real everyday threats faced by women and girls, and perpetrated most often by the men they know, seem unserious. But in its approach to the development of a young writer, Fangirl is a touching journey. We see writing as a means of coming of age, and by the end we glimpse the beginning of one writer’s quest to find her own voice.

Atonement by Ian McEwan

One night in 1935, when Briony is an imaginative 13-year-old, she accuses the son of her family’s servant, Robbie, of committing a crime he’s innocent of. In general, Briony has a natural inclination toward storytelling; and in particular her mind on that night is influenced by a moment she witnessed between her sister, Cecilia, and Robbie earlier that day. In 1940, Cecilia is a nurse and estranged from her family. Robbie’s enlistment is a condition of his release from prison. And Briony, a nurse-in-training, is still a writer. (In a rejection letter from a periodical, with an appearance by Elizabeth Bowen, we read a critique of a scene recognizable as one we’ve read earlier in the book.) While writing is central to Briony throughout the novel, it’s Atonement’s extraordinary metafictional twist of an ending (which I dare not give away to readers out there who don’t know) that to me emphasizes the lengths we’ll go, the detours we’ll take, in life as in writing, to try to find the right ending. It’s a book whose metafictional elements make it so famous it feels almost unnecessary to include it on a reading list 25 years after its publication, but it was probably the first book I read, back in college, that made me realize just how important metafiction can be to a novel.

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

It’s made clear at several moments in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale that the first-person narrator known to us only as Offred is offering the reader a story. (“Because I’m telling you this story I will your existence. I tell, therefore you are.”) We know from Offred’s telling that before her capture and conscription as a handmaid to one of Gilead’s “commanders” she worked in a library. She loved books when she was still allowed to have them. While perhaps not professionally a “writer,” Offred is certainly a storyteller with a literary sensibility, one whose voice the architects of Gilead are trying their hardest to silence. In the book’s epilogue, set in 2195 at an academic conference, a Professor Pieixoto of Cambridge University delivers a keynote address on the subject of his discovery and transcription of a collection of thirty cassette tapes found in a footlocker in what used to be Maine, which his partner academic has coined “The Handmaid’s Tale,” which is an intentionally vulgar pun on tail: “That being, to some extent, the bone, as it were, of contention, in that phase of Gileadean society of which our saga treats.”

Near the end of his keynote, Professor Pieixoto scolds Offred for not describing more of the “workings” of the Gileadean empire, or better yet, printing off pages from Commander Waterford’s computer. From this epilogue we learn, for certain, that Gilead has fallen; that Offred was able to record her story, and possibly make it as far as Maine in her escape; and that the world after the fall of Gilead is just as misogynistic, that the academics have little regard for their “anonymous author,” and that Gilead’s worldview was not eradicated, just made, once again, latent.

This postscript changes one’s reading of the pages before it, but to me Pieixoto’s callous critiques enhance the feeling that Offred’s voice is her own. She tells her story as she wishes, and as she is able in her circumstances to tell it. And in Offred’s time, as in our own, telling one’s story is an act of resistance.

I Refused to Accept What My Body Couldn’t Do

Posted on August 7, 2025August 6, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

The Last Try

My husband and I first met our reproductive endocrinologist (RE) on a cool, weakly lit March afternoon. He sat behind a large desk with a tropical fish tank that spanned the length and height of the wall behind him. I’d come straight from a class and was wearing a jean skirt and leather boots because I needed him to know how sexy and alive I felt. Only in pregnancy is thirty-five considered “geriatric.” At thirty-three, I was still fertile and open to possibilities. Unlike those other women in the waiting room, I wasn’t desperate. I didn’t really need him. I would portray an image of strength. My voice wouldn’t crack, I wouldn’t cry.

Sitting there, I realized I found the doctor attractive. Short, compact and muscular, he pulsed with a sexual energy, as if he could compact the world’s energy in his hands and BOOM, produce a baby. He could definitely help us.

He started with a long series of questions about my health history and our fertility struggles. I did most of the talking with Scott adding details here and there. Each time I spoke, the RE seemed a little impatient, as if he’d heard it all before. He wanted to know how long we’d been trying to have a baby (three and a half years), how old I was when we started trying (twenty-nine), how long it had taken to achieve the first pregnancy (about a year) and then, the second (another year). I tried to focus on what he was saying instead of the brightly colored fish that swam behind his head.

“And the first pregnancy ended—?” He paused. “I’m sorry. I have to ask,” he said.

I was glad for his sensitivity, but that didn’t make it easier.

“About seven weeks,” I said. No matter how often I went over these losses, I was surprised by the depth of emotion that still pooled beneath the surface. Strange details, a secret history. The bathroom I stopped at after teaching my class on the morning the bleeding had started, the old, ugly yellow tiles on the floor at my feet, the shuttle I’d taken up the hill to the parking lot and how sure I was that the student who got on after me could see the pain and fear on my face.

No matter how often I went over these losses, I was surprised by the depth of emotion that still pooled beneath the surface.

“And what happened then?” he said, gently.

I told him how I’d called the doctor’s office and a nurse had suggested rest. How the bleeding had continued and I’d ended up in the ER because I didn’t know how painful a miscarriage would be. I said I’d had a fever and threw up. I didn’t say how the doctor in the ER had put his hand on my leg and said he understood how hard it was, or how I’d appreciated that tenderness.

I looked around the room and tried to focus on the facts. Paper, fluorescent lights, folders, desk, black dress shoes poking out from underneath the desk.

I told him we’d started trying again a few months later and that I’d gotten pregnant for the second time about eight months after that. I said that for two years I’d gone to acupuncture, watched my diet, tried to relax, gone to yoga, tried not to worry, tried to forget how important this all was. I wanted him to see I’d been so, so good.

“And the second pregnancy—what happened then?”

He looked up and pushed a box of tissues toward me.

“I’m sorry, but this is important.”

“We were so happy when we heard a heartbeat at the first ultrasound around eight weeks,” I began.

Scott squeezed my hand.

“I’d been really nauseated the entire time. Then, right around the twelve-week mark, the nausea disappeared. I thought it was normal.”

I pulled a tissue from the box and wiped at my nose.

“We had the second ultrasound in the thirteenth week,” I continued. “We went in thinking everything was fine. That we made it through. But then there was no heartbeat.”

That one sentence conveyed so little about the actual moment. It seemed my clear-eyed strength could not save me from the sudden flood of memories: the OB’s cold instruments and her magenta dress, the way the air had suddenly flattened when she said she couldn’t find a heartbeat. How I’d thought she was wrong at first, that she was mistaken or talking to someone else, how her eyes had filled with tears.

It wasn’t this doctor’s job to care about all that. I held my breath, afraid that if I breathed, it would all come rushing out.

“I’m sorry,” he said again, softly.

We went through the rest quickly. The D & C after the second miscarriage to see if we could determine what had gone wrong and how the tests were inconclusive, and then, later, more remedies, tests and procedures.

“We’ve never had any answers,” I said.

At the end, he took me in for an ultrasound. As he moved the transducer wand around inside of me, he announced that my uterus looked good—really good.

“Nice, smooth lining here,” he said. And I felt proud and happy, as if I were responsible for my fine-looking uterus, as if it were a sign.

Back in his office, he scratched a few more things into my chart and when he finally spoke, it seemed he wanted me to understand the seriousness of my situation.

“At 33, with your history of two miscarriages and no pregnancies in the two years, things don’t look great,” he said.

I stiffened, skeptical. Wasn’t it his job to scare us, to make us believe the only way forward was with his help?

“But what are our chances of conceiving on our own?” I said. “I mean, considering I’ve gotten pregnant twice already?”

“I’d say between 1-2% each month,” he said.

That math didn’t compute. I realized I’d been half expecting him to say that we didn’t need his help. That we should just keep trying on our own and eventually it would happen. Fertility treatments were for couples with a diagnosed problem. We didn’t have a diagnosis, which I wanted to believe meant it would eventually just happen. But now I realized this doctor with all his tests and data had the upper hand. He had the precedence of the hundreds of women he’d worked with before me. Numbers don’t lie. Perhaps, he knew my body better than I did.

He said that IUI, or intrauterine insemination, would be a good place to start. Since we’d managed to get pregnant twice already, maybe we just needed a little help, and IUI was cheaper than IVF. He knew neither procedure would be covered by our HMO insurance. I’d start on Clomid to encourage the production of more egg follicles, and we could try a few rounds.

I studied the family portraits that lined the walls above his head. His beloved wife’s hand on his shoulder, their four beautiful children arrayed around them. I saw now that they had procreated in the bloom of youth. His triathlon calves and lush head of hair, her satisfied smile, said all this. I imagined their mansion and pool, the elite private schools for their children and a Porsche parked along their rose-lined driveway.

I saw now that they had procreated in the bloom of youth.

I thought of our dirty old house and felt a flush of shame. There was the kitchen faucet that sprayed water from the handle and our overgrown lawn. The dusty, unpaved alley, our cheap flooring and windows that leaked whenever it rained. Comparatively, our life decisions suddenly seemed misguided. The way we’d sought meaning over money, our teaching jobs and dreams of art, our sensible shared car with its 150,000 miles. The picnics, camping trips and thrift stores. I saw it all so clearly now. We needed more money, and we needed our youth back. We needed better plans, better hair, better teeth, clean countertops. But it was too late now.

That spring, Scott and I had completed a series of foster-to-adopt classes and an adoption home study, which meant we were almost certified to become foster and adoptive parents with LA County. After three and a half years of trying to get pregnant, it seemed it was time to move on. We’d always agreed that we would adopt if we were unable to conceive. But instead of feeling excitement as we neared the end of our certification process, I’d begun to wonder what if. What if we adopted a child and that journey was full of uncertainty and loss, and what if we encountered special difficulties with our adopted child, would I wonder what might have happened if we’d tried fertility medicine? I didn’t want to live with regrets.

I also couldn’t seem to shake a longing to experience pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding, to see what our biological child would look like, whether this imaginary child would have Scott’s sense of humor or endless curiosity, my pessimism or shyness. I have trouble explaining this desire even now, how overpowering it was, and why, instead of waning, it had only intensified over the many years we’d tried and failed to conceive a baby. Maybe it was simply about not getting what I wanted. Maybe it was a compulsion to keep striving for something that always seemed just out of reach, a stubborn belief that my hard work and persistence would be rewarded. Maybe it was simply that I had always pictured myself as a mother someday, or at least having the power to make that choice, and I couldn’t yet accept that my body couldn’t do it.

Before that meeting at the fertility clinic, we’d been planning to spend the summer in Mexico where we would attend language school and travel. After the meeting, we decided to keep our Mexico plan but instead of becoming foster-to-adopt parents upon our return, we’d begin fertility treatments.

We’d thought one last fling before adopting a child would be fun, but we were also hoping, I think, that I might get pregnant while we were away. Maybe in Mexico it would be possible to forget about getting pregnant, which many of my friends and family still believed was the answer. Just relax, they said, which was more than a little annoying –it felt impossible. I couldn’t forget how badly I wanted a baby after three years of trying for one. I felt as though they were reducing a real medical problem to an issue of positive thinking, essentially blaming me for my failure. The problem was, I so easily fell into the same magical thinking too.

For four weeks, Scott and I studied Spanish and lived with a host family in the city of Oaxaca. After class each day in the afternoon heat, we wandered the cobblestone streets. In the town zócalo, a teacher’s strike was playing out. Soldiers rode around in the backs of pickup trucks, their guns pointed out toward the sidewalks where we walked. We stopped at bookstores and museums. We sat under trees. We ate tlayudas and tacos on the street. We went to the annual Guelaguetza arts festival and were delighted when Lila Downs took a seat in front of us.

After the month was over, we travelled to the Yucatan. In Tulum, we stayed at a small hotel and caught taxis to the beach. We waded into the turquoise water and slept under the shade of a palapa. The heat was all-consuming. In the afternoons, moody clouds gathered overhead while parrots, parakeets, Yucatan jays and blue-crowned Motmots called out from the jungle. Sometimes, lightning and thunder broke across the sky and then rain fell in great torrents like waterfalls.

A small soaking pool sat in the middle of the courtyard at our hotel. The pool had smooth concrete walls, white tile and an arbor with a vine of flowers for shade. We’d sit there in the afternoons, usually just the two of us, ordering drinks from the bar and watching the other guests. The hotel was half-empty in the middle of hurricane season, and I felt empty too—empty and aimless, but also, free. I sat close to Scott in the cool water, book in one hand, my other resting on his muscular thigh or grazing his swim trunks. When we returned to our room, we were hungry, sick with lust and love. Afterward, I’d feel salty and ironed-out lying next to him under the fan, still heavy with need. I realized I didn’t care about babies anymore. The rest of my life, I decided, I just wanted to feel this way. I wanted pleasure, not pain. I wanted to be in my body and fully in the world.

I wanted pleasure, not pain. I wanted to be in my body and fully in the world.

At dusk, we trekked to town, mud splattered across our calves from the wet streets. I wore dresses that came off easily. We played cards and drank beer, cracking jokes and people-watching in hot, humid bars. We gossiped and practiced our Spanish, and forbade each other from speaking of children. We’d spent years trying to conceive a baby, years that now felt wasted. Away from home, I saw the possibility of forward momentum. Yes, there was a melancholy in my life that wasn’t there before, but here, my sadness took on an exquisitely breakable quality like pain that becomes pleasure, like exoskeletons crushed to sand. Outside of me somehow.

But when the summer ended, we came home to our regular lives. I still was not pregnant. My best friend was about to give birth to her second child, and I helped throw a baby shower for her. I’d started thinking about getting pregnant when she gave birth to her first child, and now four years later, she was having her second. The familiar longing returned. I wanted to know what my friends and coworkers knew, what my sister, mother and cousins knew. It was inexplicable, this biological pining, an unshakeable baby fever.

I was also newly hopeful. I now had a secret weapon that my friends knew nothing about. Baby showers were difficult. I always felt like an outsider as I listened to the incessant talk of breastfeeding and childbirth, sleepless nights and teething toddlers. But now I had science and technology on my side. Surely, my turn was coming.

A package of medical supplies arrived sometime that fall after three failed IUI’s and we’d made the decision to move on to IVF. When I unpacked it all, my medications consumed half of our kitchen table. There were bandages, alcohol swabs, sharps, a sharps container, syringes, folic acid and baby aspirin. There were vials of Menopur for injections that would hopefully stimulate extra egg follicles, boxes of Endometrin and Estrace to strengthen the lining of the uterus. The side effects, I noticed, were all the same: breast tenderness, headache, nausea, irritability and drowsiness. They were also signs of pregnancy, which meant, I realized, that I’d be obsessing over whether treatments were working or if it was simply the hormones.

I texted a photo to Scott. I thought this might be the beginning of a series of photos documenting the life of our child. Look! I’d say to our future child. Isn’t it funny this is how you were conceived?

I made the hormone injections Scott’s job because it was something he could physically engage in after all this time. He hated causing me pain, but his discomfort gave me some small pleasure—maybe now he would understand how hard this had been for me.

One night I had to do the injection myself because I was teaching late and the timing of the shot had to be exact. Ten minutes before class, I unlocked the faculty restroom and entered, glad to find it empty. Inside a stall, I sat with my back against the wall facing the toilet. I removed my supplies from a paper bag and arranged them on a paper towel that I laid on the tile floor: swab, syringe, needle, vial of follicle stimulating hormones. The nurse had shown me how to attach the needle to the syringe, puncture the bladder, turn it upside down and pull the solution into the syringe. I flicked it with my fingertip to remove the air bubbles. I unzipped my pants and pinched an unbruised section of skin on my belly. The bruises didn’t have time to heal between injections, but still, belly was better than thigh—more than once, a jolt of pain had exploded through my leg when Scott had hit a nerve. It wasn’t the idea of pain that bothered me now though. It was my uterus and ovaries somewhere behind the skin, a fear that the needle would reach all the way inside of me. I took another breath and poked my skin with the needle. It bounced off, and a bright dot of blood appeared. I can’t do this, I thought. But not doing it was not an option.

I took another breath. This time I jabbed with more force and like that, the needle slid right in. I laughed out loud as I watched as the fluid disappear under my skin. I’d done it! This one impossible thing that would make other things possible.

A couple of weeks later, I found myself back in my RE’s office to see how many follicles I’d grown. The more follicles you produce, the better the chances of IVF success. Scott couldn’t get away from work that morning, so my best friend had come with me. When the doctor walked in, I felt suddenly foolish. Grown women shouldn’t need hand-holding, his face seemed to say. I should be able to take things in stride. I should be witty, warm, sensitive, self-aware and mature, possessing the wisdom that comes with age, but also a youthful optimism and energy, all while maintaining my sense of humor. In other words, good. Deserving of motherhood. And yet here I was, weepy and weak, a big baby, with my hand-holding friend.

I tried to decipher the images on the computer screen as he measured each follicle and wrote down numbers in my chart.

“Well, I don’t see too many,” he said, finally. “I’m surprised. I’d expect to see more for a woman your age.”

He looked up, saw that I was crying and handed me a tissue.

“It’s not bad though,” he said. “Fine, really. We have enough to continue.” He paused. “Hey, you have a plan, remember? If this doesn’t work, you’ll adopt.”

I nodded. But I hated his tone of pity. And I hated how it sounded as if he’d already given up.

IVF makes you feel like you are finally getting close. After months or years of going about it the old-fashioned way, you feel powerful enlisting the help of science. When I was ingesting all those pills, making appointments and preparing syringes, showing up at the clinic several times a week for blood draws or ultrasounds, I felt like I was working toward something. And after the veins in my arms became sore and bruised, and even after the time a nurse who was filling in for the phlebotomist one Sunday morning couldn’t find my vein and stabbed the needle over and over into the crease of my arm, I didn’t give up. I felt grateful to be doing something measurable and exact.

And yet here I was, weepy and weak, a big baby, with my hand-holding friend.

I wondered if my real problem was one of class and race. Were I not a white, middle-class, American woman with a sense that I was entitled to certain things in life, would I have been so surprised by my bad luck? I might have been forced to move on because other options were out of reach. Perhaps it was selfish or emblematic of my privilege that I spent so many years obsessed with having a baby, so much time and money spent chasing something that just wasn’t meant to be. But in the clinic waiting room, I saw a demographic that matched that of my neighborhood in Southern California. It was a racially-diverse group of working- and middle-class women, all of us accompanied by sisters, mothers, aunts and friends, boxes of tissues nearby, our anxious partners staring at the screens on their phones. They were women like me. I realized that the desperation of wanting a baby and being unable to have one is universal, even if solutions are not.

When the holidays came, we waited for the results of a blood test to see if our first round of IVF had worked. We were in Texas visiting my family, a trip I’d hoped would be a distraction during the two-week wait, which is the period of time between embryo transfer and pregnancy test. Every microsecond of those two weeks had been consumed by doubt and uncertainty, excitement and despair, every twinge a cause for extended analysis. I compared each bodily sensation to what I could remember from my two pregnancies. Were those implantation cramps or period cramps? Was I extra hungry? Were my boobs extra sore?

We were staying with my sister and her husband and though they knew that we were waiting for our IVF results, my parents didn’t know. My parents had driven back to Dallas after Christmas, and I was glad. My mother hadn’t inquired about my fertility treatments since the first time I’d mentioned it, and I didn’t bring it up. I think she viewed it as a private matter, and I felt relieved to not have to talk about it.

After my first miscarriage, she’d cried softly into the phone.

“I’m so sorry,” she said. “I just don’t understand. None of the women in our family have had trouble getting pregnant.”

I felt a familiar clenching in my chest, like something twisting or breaking. It was a comment that recalled all the ways she thought I’d failed at womanhood, something I’d heard from her before. I was different from my older sister and different from her. As I was going through puberty, she’d mused out loud, more than once, about why I was so tall and flat-chested, or why I was so sensitive and shy. And now, why I couldn’t have a baby.

After my second miscarriage, she’d asked about the tests we’d had.

“Did they find out what’s wrong with you?” she’d said over the phone.

Even though I’d learned in adulthood to love all my imperfect body was capable of, to love the pleasure it gave me and others, the experience of going through infertility had revived all my old insecurities, and my mother’s questions hit this raw, tender place. Perhaps my infertility was a sign that my womanhood was flawed, that my mother had been right all along. There was a natural flaw that I couldn’t fix, some innate stubbornness or immaturity, and it was also, somehow, my fault.

My mother was trying to deal with her own shock, I think. She was trying to understand. She wanted me to know she was concerned, that I was loved. But I wanted her to tell me it was going to be okay, that I’d done everything right, that there was nothing wrong with me. That I’d make a great mom someday. I wanted to be mothered.

On the day of the pregnancy test, I woke up early. Scott and I dressed quickly and drove thirty minutes to a medical clinic that would do blood work on New Year’s Eve. A few hours later, my cell phone rang. I sat down on the bed in my sister’s guestroom and answered it, Scott sitting next to me.

“I’m sorry, Kathleen,” the nurse said. Suddenly, every piece of bad news I’d ever had blew in all at once, like a crack of thunder.

That afternoon, we walked for a long time. The suburban streets of my sister’s neighborhood were empty and quiet, and the winter trees looked arthritic in the cold dusk. I shoved my gloved hands into my pockets and wiggled my fingers in the holes of the lining in my coat.

My dictionary tells me that the word pitiful means deserving of or arousing pity, something lamentable or mournful. Despicable, contemptible or miserable. But none of these seem exactly right. I felt pathetic. After five years, my situation had become redundant. I wondered if listening to me had become burdensome. Surely, I was exhausting to my friends and family. A pitiful version of a woman, a faulty link in the ancestral line. But maybe what I hated most was needing everyone so badly.

That spring brought another failed round of IVF with frozen embryos leftover from the first round, and then a third and final round with fresh embryos. Since money was an issue (i.e., credit card almost maxed out), my cousin, who happened to be in the middle of her own IVF struggle, generously offered me all of her leftover medication. Her excellent health insurance had paid for fertility treatments so she could get more medication. My doctor found a way to work her medication into my protocol and also enrolled me in a study that would help cover the cost of the remaining drugs. He said we’d be more aggressive with the medication on this last round, which would hopefully stimulate more follicles.

But I did not grow more follicles and after laboratory fertilization, we ended up with four embryos, exactly the same number as the first round. The doctor scheduled my last transfer at 5:00 a.m. on a Sunday to fit it in around a triathlon he had later that morning. My acupuncturist, who’d seen me every week for two years and had listened to me on some of my hardest days, agreed to meet us at the clinic at that early hour. The acupuncture treatment would cost another $400 hundred dollars, but since it had been proven to increase IVF odds, it seemed worth it.

I felt pathetic. After five years, my situation had become redundant.

The office suite was quiet and dark when we arrived, and a nurse led us to the transfer room. The acupuncturist put on some drumming music I liked and gently began tapping needles into my skin. One between my eyes and another on the top of my skull, which were my favorite points because of the intense and immediate release of pressure in my head, like steam from a vent. She placed a few needles on each leg near my shins and knees. I closed my eyes and tried to breathe.

Afterward, Scott came back in the room. The three of us cracked jokes about the doctor showing up in running shorts with sweatbands on his wrists and forehead. Scott made increasingly ludicrous suggestions about the doctor’s potential attire and what else he might demand of his staff at 5 a.m. It felt good to laugh. I was optimistic: we had four good embryos, and I felt healthy and hopeful.

The doctor came in looking spry and healthy and shook each of our hands in turn. At our first embryo transfer, his question about whether we wanted to transfer one or two embryos had surprised us. It was not a question Scott and I had discussed and for a moment, we’d felt triumphant. Not only would I get pregnant, I’d have twins! This time, sobered by experience, we said we wanted to use all four embryos.

I lay back on the table, and the doctor threaded the catheter through my cervix. I felt a slight fluttering sensation when he released the embryos into my uterus and then, it was over. Compared to other treatments and tests I’d undergone to become pregnant, this was the gentlest. I felt almost nothing. No passion, no pain. I tried to enjoy it. I was a receptacle, an empty room, a vessel. Afterward, we followed protocol and waited for twenty minutes. I remained lying down on the table and Scott held my hand. We were quiet.

When I can no longer write about this, I spend the morning going over my old charts, and I begin to see myself the way I suspect my RE saw me. I become a patient, a body, a problem, columns of numbers in a chart. White blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, platelet count, absolute neutrophils, lymphocytes, basophils. I read his terse, practical notes from our first meeting: infertility, SAB x 2 SAB, discussed treatment option, Plan 01 +/- IUI, Heparin in pregnancy.

It’s my experience he recorded there but devoid of all emotion. If only it could have been so straightforward, if only I could have been an efficient machine, scientific, neutral and predictable. But I see the intangibles in between the lines of my chart. His desire to make my dreams come true, my own emotions and embodied experience, and the grand, existential mystery of conception.

In the old files, I also find a computer printout of our embryos in pyrotechnic color. Colored in aqua, hot pink, red and yellow, they looked like bulbous, tropical fruits. My first round of IVF had produced just four viable embryos. Some women get as many as eight or nine. Embryos are graded on a scale of one to four, four being the highest. The grade is based on how many cells have developed by day three and how distinct the cells look, i.e. whether the edges show fragmentation. A “perfect” day three embryo has eight cells, no fragmentation, and evenly sized cells. I’m not sure what grade mine received, but I knew they weren’t perfect.

When I examine them now, I notice two that look pretty good with six cells each, blooming on top of each other like little chrysanthemums. But even these good ones have smaller blobs breaking free from the main mass. The other two have just four cells and show a lot more fragmentation, little breaks and uneven edges, crevices and dark creases.

In the old files, I also find a computer printout of our embryos in pyrotechnic color.

On another printout I see the two frozen embryos we used in the second round that were in even worse shape. They look sad and featureless. One is collapsed on one side, like a deflated balloon. Another is wrinkled and lopsided with dark spots like tiny moons circling the main clump. Despite all this, I’m struck by a sense of possibility. For all those years of trying to get pregnant, I’m reminded that we could make embryos. And suddenly, I feel an inexplicable sliver of hope.

It was June when we found out our last round failed. Almost a year had passed since we’d started fertility treatments. In that time, we’d endured six failed treatments between IUI and IVF, and we both knew we’d come to the end. The hormones had made me unbearable to myself and to Scott. We were out of money, patience and emotional reserves. After taking four containers of sharps to the hazardous waste facility and then vacuuming under all the beds, after clearing out the hand-me-down maternity clothes I’d been stuffing in closets for the last five years and throwing out all the extra syringes and empty pill bottles, the house felt empty. School was out, and both of us were off for the summer. With no more IVF appointments or acupuncture, I suddenly had so much free time.

I’d never wanted to call myself infertile. Infertile meant you’d never have kids. Infertile meant you had a diagnosis. Infertile meant you were incapable of getting pregnant. I’d struggled to accept I was any of those things. But that was what I’d become: broken and imperfect, infertile. Barren.

I felt sad and moved slowly, as if I were swimming underwater. I wandered the rooms of our house, angry and irritable. In the evenings, Scott and I lay wrapped together on the couch watching violent, fantastical TV shows. Vampire shows and detective shows and serial killer shows. I liked feeling a manufactured fear in my chest. I spent hours at the library enjoying the air-conditioning and checking out novels. At night, I stayed up late, stretched out on the couch with my books and a gin and tonic, crying over the plotlines.

And yet. After all the injections, blood draws and anesthesia, after all the hormones, charting of temperatures, giant pills and bitter Chinese herbs, after all the appointments and scheduling and the years of monitoring of my caffeine, sugar and alcohol intake, there was an immense relief running alongside this sadness. And the depth of this relief surprised me. This period of waiting had been burning me up. Now, the burning would stop.

I decided to paint a wall in our living room and spent days putting up sample patches of paint: dandelion, tangerine, sky blue, sage. Scott knew to steer clear of this project. Nothing seemed right. I sat on the couch staring at the bright colors, as if there were an answer there. I liked standing at the sink to wash the paintbrushes, and I liked feeling the cool water that ran over the bristles and how the paint flowed out, lighter and lighter, until it was clear.

After I finally settled on a mushroom color and painted it on, I sat and stared at the new wall. I felt fragile and hollowed out, but there was also a small flutter in my belly. I recognized it as lightness, maybe even joy. I wondered that something as small and pointless as painting a wall could fill me with such a sense of possibility. For years, I’d been at the mercy of a powerful, unknown force. It’d been a long waiting period full of ambiguity. It’d been so long since I felt any sense of agency over my own life. But now I realized I still had choices.

I would not get pregnant, or experience my body being everything for my child.

Even on the question of children. If I even still wanted children, which I wasn’t sure that I did, it wasn’t going to be the way my friends had done it. Instead of panic, I felt a small sense of acceptance at this thought. So my children would not look like me. So I would not give birth. I would not get pregnant, or experience my body being everything for my child. I would live with that grief the rest of my life. Well, so what—so fucking what? The end game had always been parenthood, not getting pregnant. I could still become a parent. I’d always known that, but now I felt it in my body.

Somehow too, Scott and I had remained partners. We still loved each other. We basically still had everything: our health, our dreams, our home, our jobs, our friends and family, our community. Yes, I’d struggled. Yes, I’d wanted to move toward what I saw as more love and more life. There’d been harrowing detours and blockades, but I could keep moving.

I had to accept that my body was fragile, infertile and tragic. But I saw it so clearly now: it was also profoundly, and gloriously, alive.

8 Books in Which a Party Changes Everything

Posted on August 7, 2025August 6, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

Even at the loudest parties—say one of Gatsby’s, with the grotesque and glittering abundance, the “salads of harlequin designs” and “floating rounds of cocktails”—it’s often the private conversations and murmured asides that move a story along. Equally thrilling are dinner parties of an entirely different scale: a tense group of couples at a modest table, or the family holiday during which the lacquer of politeness cracks and the truth seeps out. Among my favorite things about reading fiction is how many parties I can attend without having to leave my house.

In my debut novel, The Other Wife, one of the ways I came to understand the characters was to place them in social situations in which they were supposed to have fun. The desire to be seen as a “really fun person” drives many of the narrator’s decisions. As I wrote about her time in college, I noticed how often the appearance of joy, especially at parties, demanded her effort and calculation. I started to wonder more about the way party scenes work on the page. Parties, I realized, demand two distinct registers—a broad sense of the event and a narrow focus on the interpersonal—and offer writers a great opportunity to create a mess.

As a reader, I’m not especially interested in the parties that go as planned. In the books listed below, each writer uses a party’s celebratory chaos as a backdrop for something important, whether dramatic conflict or quiet realization, to brilliant effect. The party is a tool that puts characters under pressure—to impress as hosts, to perform as happy celebrants. In the hands of these skilled authors, parties build to become spectacular displays of literary talent and social insight.

Choose This Now by Nicole Haroutunian

Haroutunian’s collection of linked stories focuses on friends Taline and Valerie (“Tal and Val”) as they navigate college and the years that follow. In “Twenty-One,” the opening story, an egg strikes Val in the temple as she and Val make their way to a Halloween party, presaging more extreme events to come. Once they finally arrive, the festivities themselves take a surprising and violent turn that will haunt Val for years. Haroutunian’s precise, understated prose sets up the questions that expand in the fourteen stories that follow: what does it feel like to grow older, to mature? How do people grapple with ambition, both artistic and personal? How do the relationships of early adulthood evolve? How does one salvage the pleasure and wash away the rest? That last question is top of mind for Val in “Twenty-One” as she cleans her face: “I want to remove egg, retain glitter.”

The Late Americans by Brandon Taylor

Taylor’s second novel, set in Iowa City, follows a range of people at various stages of financial, professional, and artistic success. Fear of debt and the fact of debt cast a shadow over this landscape; the financial preoccupation feels especially vivid when Fyodor, who works in meat processing, attends a party at a gallery. Gazing at his fellow party attendees, Fyodor thinks: “They were anonymous, elegant people who seemed part of a different species […] Nothing in his life had anything to do with this place.” Fyodor’s anguish leads to a public outburst. In a gallery at a party, Fyodor becomes—unwittingly, and unbidden—his own temporary installation, a thing to be observed. Later, in the car, he asks his (sometimes) boyfriend, Timo, “‘Did you have a good time?’” The question reads as both perfunctory and absurd, and Timo’s response: “‘No, as a matter of fact, I didn’t,’” is unsurprising. This brief exchange holds several of the novel’s overarching questions, as does the landscape of the party itself: questions of money and pleasure, public behavior and private sorrow.

The Stories of John Cheever by John Cheever

This story collection, winner of the 1979 Pulitzer Prize, is chock-full of parties; one wonders how many times the word “gin” appears. There are fundraisers and dinners, vacations and holidays, often set in the suburbs of New York City, and there is always a sizzling undercurrent of desire—sometimes for another person, sometimes for escape from the party, sometimes, somehow, for what is already there. Under the sparkly décor and chiming glass, these stories are piercing, haunting, and deeply melancholy. Cheever’s masterful ability to build tension allows seemingly cheery exchanges (“‘Why, thank you for coming!’”) to introduce a worrisome chill to the sprawling gatherings. Insincerity blazes as brightly as the jewelry at these endless social events. This quote from “The Children” says it all: “It was not the Mackenzies’ idea of a good party. Helen Jackson tried unsuccessfully to draw them into the circle of hearty, if meaningless, smiles, salutations, and handshakes upon which that party, like every other, was rigged.”

Seating Arrangements by Maggie Shipstead

Shipstead’s debut, set in an East Coast island town, follows the Van Meter family—Winn, Biddy, and their daughters Daphne and Livia—over the course of Daphne’s wedding weekend. The novel is playful in its treatment of the Van Meters’ extensive wealth and avoids deriding it. Shipstead takes care to truly develop these characters, both acknowledging their material comfort and exploring the limitless hunger for more that persists despite all they have. For Winn, this desire includes a reckless, if often comic, desire for Agatha, one of Daphne’s bridesmaids. The beauty of the Van Meters’ world is rendered without excluding its fissures and flaws; a glossy aspirational tale this is not. As he prepares to join his family on the island, Winn is wary of what lies ahead: “[N]ot a straightforward exercise in familial peacekeeping and obligatory cheer but a treacherous puzzle, full of opportunities for the wrong thing to be said or done.”

Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout

One of Strout’s most complex and unforgettable characters, Olive Kitteridge anchors the majority of these linked stories set in the fictional town of Crosby, Maine. Olive is jarringly blunt, but she is also consumed by compassion for her neighbors, and is often the voice, or offers the literal hand, that hauls people out of despair. At her son’s wedding reception, Olive finds even the slightest sensory detail to be antagonistic: other people’s clothing, the sound of a door closing, the odor of a guest’s perfume. Against the backdrop of the wedding—a “smallish, pleasant affair”—and the reception that follows, Strout reveals that beneath Olive’s gruff refusal to play along is deep-seated fear. Of the newlyweds, Olive has an astonishing flicker of silent insight: “They think they’re finished with loneliness.” Overwhelmed with conflicted feelings for her son—her desire for his happiness, and her doubt that he may have found it—she hides away from the party in his bedroom. Even lying on a bed in the middle of a party, she cannot achieve the solitude or peace she’s seeking—people keep coming to the door. Strout uses the chatter and fragrance of the party, the niceties and rituals, to put Olive’s thoughts about love and fear in sharp relief.

Friends of the Museum by Heather McGowan

Friends of the Museum is a gorgeous and very funny whirlwind of a novel, packed with characters aplenty—there are enough of them to justify a “Cast of Characters” list before the novel begins. This is just right for the occasion at hand: The hours preceding a fundraising gala at a New York City museum. Pivoting rapidly from one character to the next, McGowan drums up the frenetic energy required to pull off such a magnificent event. The novel’s commitment to such a range of voices—from the Curator of Film to the Chief Security Officer—reflects the enormous volume of labor and planning behind these major events and institutions. As McGowan intuitively knows, they are also the perfect, insular setting for scandals, of which there are many, all exacerbated by the fact of the gala itself. The demands of the party push each character to their limit; the occasion drains them of pretense and forces their secrets into the carefully curated light.

Wild Houses by Colin Barrett

Barrett’s novel follows two superb story collections (Young Skins and Homesickness) and features a cast of unnerving, violent, clever characters. Dev Hendrick—quiet son of an ill, absent father and dead mother—agrees to let his home serve as a satellite for criminal enterprise. Barrett presents the story out of chronological order, and deepens the painful suspense—what will happen to Doll English?—by describing the party at which Doll is kidnapped in exacting, granular detail. Excruciatingly, Doll spends several minutes at this ill-fated gathering describing an earlier party, in which his brother “‘did tear the lobe a bit’” on another man’s ear. In the world Barrett creates in these pages, social activity is always laced with potential danger.

Three Stages of Amazement by Carol Edgarian

Set in an ever-changing, beautifully rendered San Francisco, Edgarian’s novel is the story of Charlie Pepper and Lena Rusch and their family, friends, and colleagues. Within minutes of meeting Lena and Charlie, the reader is ushered into the first of several parties, a New Year’s Eve celebration hosted at the Pepper/Rusch home. Edgarian uses the event to introduce a rich and varied group of characters and circumstances, including the crucial conflict: Charlie, a surgeon who needs funding for a medical invention, secures that funding from Lena’s wealthy, paternal uncle, Cal. Lena happens to detest Cal for his long-ago affair with her mother; worse, Cal employs Lena’s ex. A second party, in honor of Cal’s daughter’s engagement, brings Lena and her ex together, raising the stakes and complicating Lena’s life and marriage.

God Is a Gator and He’s Watching Reruns

Posted on August 6, 2025July 30, 2025 by Preety Sidhu

Through Possession

On the news a man holds an alligator like an infant.
In his home there is a jacuzzi tub in the living room
for the alligator to water-rest while the man watches
Gilligan’s Island or MacGyver. At one point
he puts the gator’s face to his own and smooches
it all over like unexpected rain. The gator blinks
his thin lily lids in reception. In considering aﬀection,
I think first of touch then of obsession — I do not
know softness without longing, and although
the alligator is far from soft, his entire constitution
communicates love. My lover collects . . .
perhaps the sentence stops there. I too extend
myself through objects though mine is most of
a gathering, some of a worshiping — talismans
that remind me of my mother or the saint
I believe my mother to be, martyred and mine.
I take a midterm this week in the form
of an oﬀice conversation — just the two of us
talking ego, waxing God. The balance is oﬀ, the power
in his favor, and every gland of my body sweats
in shame of my self-centered approach to artmaking
— how I see myself inside and in-middle, very little
Lord. He says there is no inside/outside, no self-
separate, that if I am in right relation, if I am in gift-giving,
(and this he encourages, but softly) then I too love
beyond physicality. The alligator could be my child —
Frankenstein’s monster my chance at grace.
I believe my precious things are material tethers
to acts of creative and saving gestures. I did not say this
first, the professor did during the midterm, and because
I hoard quips, sentiments, heart-moments, perspectives,
and the rest — a compulsion to know so much from
so many somatic spaces — I become the light-echo
of a star that died billions of salty years ago.
It makes no sense really no sense no sense
since too much light resurrects the dead,
and if the dead come back,
what do I do with my blasphemous treasures?
Where does the grace go?
And who will tuck the gator in at night?

Midrash While Woman

Genesis 1-3

Click to enlarge

Rax King Is Embracing the Mess

Posted on August 6, 2025August 5, 2025 by EL Assistant2

Now, I’m not an astrology girlie—which I think is technically a finable offense here in Los Angeles. But I do think the stars performed some elaborate cosmic choreography to ensure I shared a timeline with Rax King. Underneath her name, her email signature declares her the “Unofficial Writer-in-Residence at The Cheesecake Factory”—which confirms that we were also destined to become friends.

The James Beard Award-nominated writer and author of the wildly celebrated and critically lauded collection Tacky has bestowed upon us mere mortals a new banger. In Sloppy, King dives headfirst into the gloriously complicated parts of life: addiction, heartbreak, ADHD, grief, sex work—all the things (to quote my favorite musical, Chicago) we hold near and dear to our hearts. From her parents’ deep commitment to 12-step sobriety to her own indulgences like shoplifting from Brandy Melville, she explores the tangled web of addiction, impulsivity, and mental health with unvarnished honesty, sharp humor, and a refusal to tidy anything up for the sake of comfort.

A messy blessing sent from above, Rax King reminds us that embracing the mess is the truest form of grace.

Greg Mania: Like ‘“tacky,” I’ve always identified with “sloppy”—and I don’t see that changing, no matter how therapized, financially literate, or otherwise “grown-up” I get. How has your own relationship to tacky evolved alongside your claiming of sloppy? And what’s it been like to reconcile both as permanent parts of who you are?

Rax King: Well, “tacky” and “sloppy” are both words with somewhat negative connotations. Tacky things are understood to be in poor taste, while sloppy ones are understood as dirty or messy. These are two qualities of mine that I used to wish I didn’t have. I wanted to be the sweet, thoughtful, ladylike person, which is very funny to remember now—I can’t even picture myself as ladylike in my imagination. I probably could have become that person if I had the willpower for such a significant character overhaul, but we both know I don’t. It was either change or reconcile and, predictably enough, I picked the easier option.

Whatever flaws are in me, I now have to accept they’re inescapable.

GM: You call reconciliation the “easier option,” but it feels like there’s deep work in claiming these identities. Besides writing this book, what did that reconciliation actually look like for you—and do you still find yourself having to reconcile with those parts of yourself?

RK: Reconciliation of my, shall we say, less admirable traits is certainly an ongoing process. Actually, sobriety has helped a lot because, without substance abuse to fall back on, I have nowhere to hide from myself. Whatever flaws are in me, I now have to accept they’re inescapable. In practice, I’ll admit that means I spend a lot of time groaning and squirming, feeling mortified as I triage old memories that I never dealt with, but it’s better this way than living in a constant cycle of blackouts and hangovers.

GM: You and I both write about the messy truth of things—obsession, sex, desire, heartbreak, identity. But Sloppy feels like such a confident deep-dive into that territory. When did you know this was the book you had to write next?

RK: I quit drinking, and it was as if that “messy truth of things” had been waiting for me to sober up before it beat the shit out of me. In active addiction, it was easy to either glamorize my constant self-sabotage, or to numb myself from its effects before they could really wound me. In sobriety, all I could do was try to understand those ugly tendencies so I could repair the damage they’d done. So I guess Sloppy is me presenting my findings—the sloppiness undergirding all my choices, good and bad, and the changes I’ve had to make in order to live with it.

GM: Did sobriety change how you write—not just what you write about, but the actual process?

RK: I definitely had to find some new processes in sobriety. We tend to mythologize the roustabout writer who can only access his genius under the influence of his chosen drug, and that mythology allowed me to mask my self-destructiveness behind this guise of nobility, as if it were actually brave and appropriate for me to only write mid-blackout. These days, maybe because the inside of my head is quieter, I also demand that my workspaces be quieter—dead silent, ideally. It’s the only way I can retreat inward the way I think most of us have to do in order to write well.

GM: The first chapter hit me hard—I also lived with undiagnosed ADHD until adulthood, and getting that diagnosis made my whole childhood and adolescence click into place. I was diagnosed two years ago, and I’m still figuring out how to live with it. How is your life with it now?

RK: Oh, it’s great! I’m completely fixed! No, I mean, it’s a relief to at least know something is wrong with me—not something nebulous and impossible, but this specific, knowable, treatable thing. But at the end of the day, even if I can treat the problem, I can’t make it go away. They say that when you’re sober, you really need to watch your sobriety, because your addiction is out in the alley waiting for you and doing push-ups. A similar thing is true of ADHD for me. I have to make it a priority to hold it in check as sternly as possible, because the second I let my guard down, ADHD will come for me—and it’s stronger than I am.

GM: Another thing we have in common: taking our clothes off for money—and stepping into a persona to do it. You were a stripper; I was a go-go dancer. What did that version of you teach you about performance, identity, or control? And how do you relate to persona now?

My biggest takeaway as a stripper was that men are disappointingly easy to manipulate.

RK: Honestly, my biggest takeaway as a stripper was that men are disappointingly easy to manipulate. I think I had been in their thrall until then, desperate for their attention, miserable whenever I felt like I was losing it. And a big part of what made those early relationships with men so hypnotizing was that I kept thinking of them as creatures essentially unlike myself. Like, they fell for me for reasons I didn’t understand, and lost interest for equally unknowable reasons. But in strip clubs, you learn how to effortlessly push their buttons—you have to, your income depends on it. Those jobs demystified men in a way that was mostly good, because it was a huge time suck to be constantly in the throes of one incomprehensible heartbreak or another, but there was also an element in it of learning that Santa Claus wasn’t real or something.

GM: Let’s see—drugs and alcohol, sex and messy relationships, service industry jobs, money chaos… all things I’ve also lived, and all things you write about with so much heart, humor, and clarity. But before Sloppy took its final shape, were there times you wrote just to process—before you knew what was publishable? And what did that kind of writing teach you about what belonged in the book?

RK: I’m always writing just to process, so the answer to that question is yes, sort of—but the writing I do to process almost never makes it to publication. Oddball pieces might, like if I happen to generate a good sentence while I’m sob-writing, but it’s mostly important to me to maintain a firewall between therapeutic writing and the stuff I share with the world. I always tell my students that it’s inadvisable to write from an open wound. Good personal writing always feels like the author is exploring some dark corner of herself, trying to shine a light into it so she can map it out properly, but before I show people the fruits of that exploration, I want to make sure the dark corners are safe to investigate!

GM: How do you know when writing has crossed the threshold from therapeutic to ready for readers?

RK: I tend to maintain a fairly strict firewall between writing-as-therapy and writing-as-offering-to-readers. Some of the therapeutic stuff does cross that threshold, but it happens almost by accident—like, in trying to heal myself, I tell myself things I didn’t know I knew, and some of those insights feel book-ready, and others feel like things I really should have learned sometime in the anonymous LiveJournal years.

GM: You also write about grief—how memory can live inside the background noise of an object, like your father’s ashtrays, which suddenly become so present they feel almost haunted. When did you feel ready to write about that loss? And as a writer whose voice is naturally funny, do you feel like you need to metabolize grief with humor before it can live on the page?

I tend to maintain a fairly strict firewall between writing-as-therapy and writing-as-offering-to-readers.

RK: I started writing about my grief for my dad before I even got his ashes back from the funeral home, and I can’t even reread those early words about it, that’s how full of pain they are. At this point, he’s dead seven years—the grief isn’t gone, it’ll never be gone, but it’s not so lacerating that I can’t face it with humor by now. Although, that said, my grief vented itself through humor pretty frequently in the weeks after he died. I used to tell people very bluntly that my dad was dead, and then I’d burst into hysterical laughter for no reason I (or they) could understand. It was wildly inappropriate, which only made me laugh harder. Nothing was funny, but that made me feel like everything was.

GM: If Samantha Irby is my mom, you’re absolutely my sister. Who else would you cast in our literary family tree of funny writers?

RK: Aww, I love this idea! Definitely Kristen Arnett is on the family tree, and Melissa Lozada-Oliva, and Mattie Lubchansky. And I’d be quite remiss if I didn’t shout out the great Tommy Pico, who made me cry laughing when he read at Franklin Park about a million years ago.

GM: Tommy Pico—interesting, I’ll make a note to check out his work later tonight… when I go to his apartment… where I pretty much live… because I’m sleeping with him. Seriously though, how does writing alongside these and other writers shape your voice and your work?

RK: Most of the writers I admire, their voices are reminiscent in some way of the way they actually speak. That’s been hugely influential for me, this idea that the sound of one’s own natural voice can be transmitted to the page without passing through too many layers of self-conscious manipulation, and that’s the way I try to write.

GM: Sloppy is a love letter to messy, complicated personhood. What’s something you’re still learning to claim or embrace about yourself as you move forward?

RK: Ha, wouldn’t you like to know! If you’re reading this, I want you to assume I’m fixed and therefore normal now.

7 Books that Explore the Love, Hate, Desire, and Revenge of Animals

Posted on August 5, 2025August 2, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

About two months ago, my 6-year-old daughter asked me, “Dad, if you could have any superpower in the whole world, which would it be?” The ability to fly immediately popped up and why wouldn’t it? It would be sublime. But after some consideration, I answered, “I’d like to have the ability to talk to animals.” She asked why, and I told her I want to know how they feel and what they think about everything. It’s become a recurring topic of conversation between us since.

Animals play an integral role in my novel Habitat. The book is made up of nine linked narratives and the closest thing to a recurring character throughout is the clones of a celebrity dog that stars on a science fiction television show, and the descendants of those clones a century later. I was listening to a Neil Young song, “Like an Inca,” around the time the book began gelling together. The beginning of the song sat with me while I finished writing the book and it serves as the epigraph. It involves two animals from different species discussing the downfall of a human civilization. The lyric helped me perceive animals as not only the victims of humanity in the world of Habitat, but also our observers, those historians who survive us, forever watching us rise and fall, again and again.

This is a list of books that engage with animals in different ways, probing their behaviors and our relationship to them, our sympathies for and atrocities against them. These books attempt to think about animals as they naturally exist and encounter the world. And, if the first selection on the list stands out, know that I chose it for personal and autobiographical reasons—it was an early and confusing reading experience. Who knows, it may have even jumpstarted my interest in the portrayal of animals in fiction.

Jaws by Peter Benchley

I read this book nearly forty years ago, when I was too young to be reading it. I was at an age when any novelization of a film or franchise that I loved was paper gold, a glorious reincarnation of the movie. While a shark does play a large role, the novel spends more time with the non-shark hunting lives of its characters, exploring their alcoholism and extramarital affairs. The mayor in both the film and the novel is hellbent on keeping the beaches open for the summer surge. However, in the novel, he’s being pressured by the mafia, who have invested heavily in the Amity Island beach community. This may have been the first reading experience in which I felt like the book “isn’t really about” the shark, a childhood realization that, in retrospect, prepared me for novels like Moby Dick. Still, at the time, Jaws bewildered me.

“A Full-Service Shelter” from Sing to It by Amy Hempel

An epigraph precedes this short story (originally published in Recommended Reading!)…

“They knew me as the one who shot reeking crap out of cages with a hose.”
-Leonard Michaels, “In the Fifties”

And then the first line: “They knew me as the one who shot reeking crap out of cages with a hose—and liked it.” This beginning puts the reader into the perspective of an animal-loving narrator and sets up a story that focuses on the feelings, the fears, and the allegiances of the dogs in this high-kill shelter. Each paragraph begins with either “They knew us as…” or “They knew me as…” The result is ten heart-breaking and heart-warming pages for anyone who’s ever cared about a dog, or any animal for that matter. It chronicles the ups and downs of caged dogs who are likely to be euthanized. It’s a story that speaks for them, loves them, and expresses profound confusion in the face of a world that allows them to be killed. I often revisit this collection when I need some help jumpstarting a day of my own writing.

The Only Good Indians by Stephen Graham

I’ve never encountered a book by Stephen Graham Jones I didn’t like. Every book is a new departure in horror writing, exploring subgenres, and experimenting with plot and structures. The Only Good Indians is broken up into three sections and centers around an incident from ten years earlier when four friends, all adolescent boys, illegally ambushed and shot a herd of elk, including a pregnant mother elk. Ten years later, tragedies start befalling the grown men and those close to them. At the same time, they begin to have visions of a vengeful elk. Throughout the novel, Jones weaves in Blackfeet culture and questions about violence against women and the natural world. The Only Good Indians can be read, from a human perspective, as a horror novel, but through an elk’s eyes it might be read as an action revenge story about a magical elk spirit with “a very particular set of skills.”

Vasko Popa—Selected Poems: Homage to the Lame Wolf by Vasko Popa, translated by Charles Simic

Vasko Popa (1922-1991) was a Serbian poet who incorporated surrealism and Serbian folklore into his modernist style, exploring the significance of the wolf and the relationship between the Serbian orthodox church and earlier folkloric beliefs and traditions.

This collection, which I adore, is broken up into eleven parts, featuring several series of poems that touch upon the figure of the wolf. St. Sava, the founder of the Serbian orthodox church, is shown both reconstituting the wolf in service of his religion and being himself transformed by the symbol of the wolf.

In one series of poems, “Wolf’s Earth,” a father and son debate whether the wolf that they witness intertwined with the Earth is attempting to devour the Earth or protect and admire her: “Does he have a sweet tooth/For her bitter flesh/Or is he just praying to her beauty.”

The figure of the wolf in these poems is beyond our control or understanding—a symbol of a past that cannot be rewritten or forgotten despite the many ways it must contend with the present.

Raccoon by Daniel Heath Justice

A few years ago, I wouldn’t have thought I needed a study devoted to the raccoon, but after reading Justice’s book, I came to understand the impactful role the animal has played in our planet’s global and cultural history. It’s part of Reaktion Books’ Animal series, which has published over a hundred such books about the natural and cultural history of different animal species. Raccoon is an incredible examination of the animal that delves into its natural history, symbolism and cultural origins, appropriation to perpetuate racial stereotypes and hatred, and myriad other ways it has impacted the human world.

One of the many illuminating takeaways about the raccoon is its resilience and adaptability. The raccoon of today lives in a world that, if we were in its paws, would be in a post-apocalyptic landscape. Its natural habitat has been largely destroyed by the bottomless expansionism of human civilization. And despite this, the raccoon has adapted and learned to survive. With powerful physical dexterity, an omnivorous appetite, and an evolving intelligence, raccoons have an innate ability to create new and thriving homes in the wake of loss and exile. We could learn a lot from them because, as Justice considers in his epilogue, the future may be raccoon.

The Bees by Laline Paull

The Bees immerses the reader in the dystopian tale of an authoritarian regime in transition. The protagonist is a bee named Flora 717 and the story is set almost exclusively inside of a single beehive, which imposes a strict hierarchy on its members. Bees of the upper castes are named after specific plants, but those born of a lower caste are all named Flora. Most Floras are relegated to sanitation for their entire lives, removing waste and dead bees for the hive. But Flora 717 is assigned to different jobs throughout the novel: working in the nursery for the Sage (a group of priestesses), a stint in sanitation, and then making her way to foraging. These reassignments allow the reader to explore both the physical spaces of the hive as well as the architecture and motivations of the different castes, uncovering the ruthless political agendas ever-present in a hive whose Queen is ailing. The more we see of the hive and its bees, the more the novel reveals itself to be as a much a story about the real lives of bees as it is a metaphor for the fascist machinations of human power struggles. A political thriller in a beehive, a compelling protagonist, and an author whose extensive research seamlessly holds together all its parts—I couldn’t put it down.

An Immense World by Ed Yong

Of all the books on this list, Ed Yong’s exploration of animals’ senses brings me closest to the experience of communicating with them. Yong begins by imagining a human joining an elephant, mouse, robin, owl, bat, rattlesnake, spider, and mosquito in a room, and then describes the sensory experience of each animal. While all occupy the same space, their individual experiences highlight the different ways in which they sense an environment and alter our understanding of how they might feel.

An important distinction Yong makes concerning what we understand and don’t understand about animals’ behavior and senses is that while we may be able to discover, biologically, how an animal “reacts to what it senses,” we don’t know “how it feels.” In the chapter on “Pain,” Yong writes: “Imagine your entire body became delicate to the touch whenever you stubbed your toe: That’s a squid’s reality.”

For anyone seeking a better understanding of how animals experience the world—not how we experience animals in a vast network of ecologies making up a world that we think belongs to us but how they might feel—I can’t recommend An Immense World enough. It’s a wondrous journey.

The Quiet Motion of the World Informs “Feller”

Posted on August 5, 2025July 30, 2025 by Intern Electric Lit

I first read Denton Loving’s latest collection of poetry, Feller, shortly after the sun rose, on my back porch. It was one of those seasonally cool summer mornings. The wind was stirring. Branches were gently swaying. Squirrels and chipmunks were mingling below my birdfeeders out in the yard, and a couple of blue jays, in conversation, were making use of one of the old birdbaths. They were nourishing the weeds below as much as they were themselves. My dog was in my lap, taking it in. It was the perfect kind of reading experience for Feller, a collection of poetry that beautifully observes the life of the natural world. Often, it feels like an ode sung to Appalachia.

In Feller, Loving explores many of the complexities of our shared experience. There are poems here, like “The Moon Was Only a Rumor,” that make me feel connection, that ineffable thing we’re always looking for. Another poem, “Returning,” one of the book’s standouts, does the same thing for the idea of home. I could feel that too. At other times, Feller shifts to explore longing—which pops up again and again—and love, such as in the exquisite “The Octopus School of Poetry.” This is a book that you feel as you read—even when you put it away, its images and moments linger.

Loving and I were able to connect and discuss the progression of his work, poetic warmth, place, and more.

Bradley Sides: I’m sure many readers will come into Feller having read your previous collection, 2023’s Tamp. I’m always curious about the process of closing one book and beginning another—and how the two works are in conversation with one another. Can you talk about what shifted you into Feller and how you see it as both separate and similar to your previous book?

Denton Loving: I always have a lot of projects going on at the same time. In the case of these two books, Tamp and Feller, I was moving back and forth within the same period of years, writing poems about my dad and my grief after his passing, and then switching gears to write about whatever else was on my mind.

The poems that eventually became Tamp came out of me trying to process my grief. I never set out to write a book about my dad, but there was a point when I realized I had enough poems about my dad to make a book. A bit later, I suddenly knew that Tamp was finished. It wasn’t that I had written all I had to say about my dad or about grief. I could write a dozen books about my dad. But perhaps the intensity of my loss had subsided.

It was only after Tamp was completely finished—when I could take a long look at all of the poems that were left—that the shape of Feller emerged. My process is to be as organic as possible and let the book reveal itself to me.

In comparing the two books, I think my voice is fairly consistent. I think there are threads that overlap in both books, for instance, my attention to nature and particularly to the place where I live. Tamp was a very personal book, but Feller feels personal in a different way, perhaps more deeply revealing. Many of the poems in Tamp were things I wanted to share about my dad and our relationship. Many of the poems in Feller come from a more private place, and express emotions I didn’t want to write about. But the poems called for it.

BS: When Electric Literature hosted the cover reveal for Feller a few weeks back, I was really intrigued by what you said about the title: “Feller won out because I was playing with the word’s multiple meanings, and I loved that the word is so colloquial and brings with it a feeling of intimacy. It was through that framework that I could most imagine a reader diving into these poems, hopefully finding and applying layers of meaning as they read.” I love that idea of a title helping with a book’s intimacy. Outside of language, what are some of the other ways you gain intimacy with your readers in Feller?

DL: When I teach poetry workshops, I often start the sessions by talking about how I like to think of a poem as a secret. It’s a secret that is being shared widely. But it’s coming from somewhere very deep inside the poet’s being. That’s how my more successful poems are, anyway: deeply personal but bursting to escape.

Another way to think of this is to allow myself to be vulnerable. That means, for me, that I have to sometimes put away the idea of publishing the poem. When I’m writing, I don’t want to give space to worrying what people will think when they read certain things. So sometimes I convince myself that I won’t publish the poem, that I just need to write the poem for myself but don’t ever have to show it to anyone. By the time the poem is finished, I usually come around to sending it out into the world. Because it’s exactly that piece of vulnerability that usually makes the poem succeed. And if you can’t allow yourself to be vulnerable in the poem, then what’s the point?

Many of the poems in Feller express emotions I didn’t want to write about. But the poems called for it.

BS: Do you ever worry of being too personal or too vulnerable—or is that just not really a thing as far as you are concerned?

DL: On a personal level, yeah, I definitely worry about revealing too much. Like I said, I almost always convince myself to send those poems out for publication, but some poems make me feel really uncomfortable to share. I felt that way about everything I wrote when I first started thinking about publication, many years ago. My philosophy ever since the beginning has been to embrace that uncomfortable feeling. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy.

Now let me answer from a craft angle. In thinking about my own drafts and the rough drafts I’ve read from friends and students, I think poems that are exceptionally vulnerable are usually very tied to our emotions. If the poem hasn’t had time to cool down, those emotions come out of a vulnerable space and can come across as melodramatic. So that’s an argument for giving the poem whatever time it needs, and for revising your work, and for finding really good readers who will help you know how the poem is coming across.

BS: As Feller opens, you give us a series of poems—“Bluebird Dreams of Red Fox,” “Bluebird Dreams Red Fox Has Wings,” “Bluebird Flies Too Close to Red Fox,” and “Bluebird Removes Red Fox’s Tooth”—that explore the natural world, while also tackling topics such as desire and closeness. I want to hone in on the natural world first. It is abundantly apparent that you have a special bond with nature. Has that always been the case?

DL: I can’t say that I was one of those kids who lived in the woods and knew all the birds and trees, etc. I wasn’t. I was more of an indoor kid, living a very interior life, inspired fairly equally by television and books. But even so, the natural world was always really present for me, both physically and psychologically.

One reason is because my parents made a conscious choice to raise me in a rural setting, on a farm near the woods. There were animals there, both wild and domesticated. We raised big gardens and planted an orchard. All of that was important to my parents, especially my dad. He really had been one of those kids who spent most of his time outside. I still marvel at the way he could identify trees by their bark.

It took me a long time to fully appreciate everything my parents taught me, but as I’ve grown older, I’m more observant and more interested in what’s around me. I’m also just more interested in the connectivity of the natural world, especially in the fraught age we live in where the environment is changing in drastic and dramatic ways.

BS: I previously mentioned “desire.” As I was reading, I kept marking poems that explore this topic in some variation—we see it from humans, animals, and just the world. “Thirst” and “Breach” are examples of two that come to mind, but there are many here. Is it the universal shared experience of desire that makes you explore it? Or something else altogether?

DL: I started my writing career with fiction, where I was taught that every character should desire something. It can be as small as a glass of water, but it is desire in whatever form it takes that motivates character and creates action. So maybe I’ve carried that into my poetry. You mentioned “Thirst” which literally is about the desire for water. But metaphorically, it’s about a past relationship, and how the brain obsesses over what’s absent. I think you’re right, I am interested in writing about desire. It’s universal. I’m also interested in the many different ways desire manifests. Sometimes it’s about romantic love, sometimes about friendship and basic connection. The poem “Returning” explores a conundrum I often have in life which is centered around place. There are so many times in my life when I’m home that I’m plotting to leave. I love to travel and explore, and there are so many places I want to visit. I want to go see my friends who live all over the country. And yet, when I’m traveling, I get homesick. I often just can’t wait to get back to my house and my boring routine. And that’s something I’m especially interested in when it comes to desire and wanting—the way our desires twist us up and play games with us, and the way we want things that we know are bad for us or won’t work.

If the poem hasn’t had time to cool down, those emotions come out of a vulnerable space and can come across as melodramatic. That’s an argument for giving the poem whatever time it needs.

BS: Traveling is one of the things that inspires my writing the most. Since you mentioned it, I’m curious how else traveling impacts your work, if it does.

DL: Travel just generally opens our minds, right? As a writer, it so often yields new material, in both directions. There’s the material that comes from entering new spaces and learning new things. And, on the other hand, being away helps me appreciate home more, which I think leads me to some important moments of wonder. I see the place I’m from in different ways after returning from somewhere else.

BS: You live in Appalachia and your work is often classified as part of the Appalachian literary tradition. Your poetry respects the place you know, and at the same time you are also able to expand that place. The result, for me, is that your poetry feels both of home and of the bigger world, too. In one poem, for example, you plant us under a chestnut tree. In another, we are in “sticky Kentucky,”and among the songs of the whippoorwill in a third. But at other times, you also allude to Mount Athos, Xanadu, and Montañas de San Miguel.

I’m curious how you view place and its impact on writing. Is it ever limiting? Is the way we write about it a gateway to understanding something or connecting with someone beyond the regions from which we write?

DL: Place is foundational to all of my work, both my poetry and prose. Just this weekend, I taught a workshop about writing place-based poetry. It’s something I’ve thought a lot about—I live by Eudora Welty’s words: “One place understood helps us understand all places better.” That doesn’t mean that I claim to understand everything about this place where I live—neither the eighty acres of farmland and orchard and woods where I literally live, nor in the larger sense, this corner of Appalachia with its complex environment, history and socioeconomics. But it’s my place, and it’s a gift to understand it to the extent that I do. No one else is positioned to know it in exactly the same way. So it feels almost like a duty to honor that in my writing. But not in a limiting way. As a younger writer, I struggled to understand why anyone would care about this place, which maybe felt less glamorous or less interesting to a younger me than nearly every other place. Now I see it as endlessly fascinating. And as a differentiator, or as I said before, a gift. Addressing sense of place in my work allows me to share this place with people who don’t know it. Likewise, I feel entranced when I read work that helps me know places that are unfamiliar to me. It’s definitely more of a gateway than any kind of limitation.

BS: I love that: “Addressing sense of place in my work allows me to share this place with people who don’t know it.” Who are some of the writers you think of that present place really well?

I don’t consciously set out to observe the world. But I’m in the world, and I find it impossible to ignore everything in motion around me.

DL: This is a dangerous question because there’s no way I can include everyone. I’ll say that Maurice Manning’s work has been an inspiration and a model for me since I first started writing poems. Everything he writes is shaped by place in one way or another. Ron Rash, also. Some of the other poets I met early in my career who inspired me to try poetry are George Ella Lyon, Anne Shelby, Jane Hicks and Jesse Graves. All four of them write so well about place. Joy Priest, Annie Woodford, John Davis, Jr., Kari Gunter-Seymour, but there are so many others. And I’m limiting myself here to poets. There are so many fantastic prose writers whose work is inspired by a sense of place. I’ll end this list with Jennifer Stewart Miller, who is another poet who consistently inspires me and has taught me so much. Her poem, “This poem has a highway in it,” is the first example I always teach in my workshops about writing about place.

BS: Feller ends with “Rosy Maple Moth,” which is such a beautiful poem about moths and life. Truly, I’ve probably read this poem a dozen times. I’m so moved by it, and it’s absolutely the perfect poem to end the book. Reading it makes me realize how like, my goodness, this world, when we look hard enough, is full of small wonders, but we have to take the time to look.

I want to close by asking you about your own relationship to the act of observation. How much time do you spend just looking and listening and seeing our world?

DL: I don’t consciously set out to observe the world, or not as much as I should. But I’m in the world, and I find it impossible to ignore everything in motion around me. Today, for example, the farmers in my community were rushing to put up the first cuttings of hay before rain sets in, and the smell of fresh cut and curing hay was everywhere in the air. In the mowed fields, vultures combed through the piles of hay searching for the snakes and rodents that get caught in the mowing. An indigo bunting flew across the gravel road, its blue feathers shining in the June sun as it swooped down in front of my car and back up before it disappeared into the trees. I saw a fox slink out of the woods behind my house, and a mockingbird was divebombing the little fox, warning it away from its nest. There is always something happening around here, and that’s true for all places. We just have to be open to seeing it. The rosy maple moth is a great example. I spent the majority of my life never coming into contact, or more likely just never noticing these moths, and then one day, they appeared in front of me. And they refused to be ignored.

SEARCH

SEARCH

Whatever’s Killing the Cattle Is Killing Him Too

“The Cattleman” by Aaron Gwyn

Rickey Fayne and Carrie R. Moore on Writing the Blackness of the South

The Cultural and Political Obsession With Trans People Is Harming My Community

7 Novels That Prove Writers Can Make the Best Protagonists

Mind of Winter by Laura Kasischke

All My Puny Sorrows by Miriam Toews

Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler

Red Pill by Hari Kunzru

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell

Atonement by Ian McEwan

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

I Refused to Accept What My Body Couldn’t Do

The Last Try

8 Books in Which a Party Changes Everything

Choose This Now by Nicole Haroutunian

The Late Americans by Brandon Taylor

The Stories of John Cheever by John Cheever

Seating Arrangements by Maggie Shipstead

Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout

Friends of the Museum by Heather McGowan

Wild Houses by Colin Barrett

Three Stages of Amazement by Carol Edgarian

God Is a Gator and He’s Watching Reruns

Through Possession

Midrash While Woman

Rax King Is Embracing the Mess

7 Books that Explore the Love, Hate, Desire, and Revenge of Animals

Jaws by Peter Benchley

“A Full-Service Shelter” from Sing to It by Amy Hempel

The Only Good Indians by Stephen Graham

Vasko Popa—Selected Poems: Homage to the Lame Wolf by Vasko Popa, translated by Charles Simic

Raccoon by Daniel Heath Justice

The Bees by Laline Paull

An Immense World by Ed Yong

The Quiet Motion of the World Informs “Feller”

“The Cattleman” by Aaron Gwyn

Mind of Winter by Laura Kasischke

All My Puny Sorrows by Miriam Toews

Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler

Red Pill by Hari Kunzru

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell

Atonement by Ian McEwan

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

The Last Try

Choose This Now by Nicole Haroutunian

The Late Americans by Brandon Taylor

The Stories of John Cheever by John Cheever

Seating Arrangements by Maggie Shipstead

Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout

Friends of the Museum by Heather McGowan

Wild Houses by Colin Barrett

Three Stages of Amazement by Carol Edgarian

Through Possession

Midrash While Woman

Jaws by Peter Benchley

“A Full-Service Shelter” from Sing to It by Amy Hempel

The Only Good Indians by Stephen Graham

Vasko Popa—Selected Poems: Homage to the Lame Wolf by Vasko Popa, translated by Charles Simic

Raccoon by Daniel Heath Justice

The Bees by Laline Paull

An Immense World by Ed Yong

DON’T MISS OUT

YOUR INBOX IS LIT