You can completely renovate a home in half an hour. If you don’t believe me, watch TV. It’s all in the magic of editing: the first act shows the renovators swamping a couple with a $50,000 budget with color palette questions; the second act includes the problems, the challenges, and whoops-we’ve-hit-a-water-main; the third act is the unveil as the happy family walks in their completely overhauled home, resplendent with mood lighting, mason jars, and macramé.
Then the credits roll. The TV production cleaning crew comes in; the macramé moves out. Mere props! The audience at home suspects they’re props (“really? on that budget?”), but we don’t care because 1) we like being entertained and 2) there’s something about the life-freshening magic of renovations that we find aspirational. Who doesn’t love a good before-and-after?
Homes are often metaphors in novels because they make such effective mirrors of our interior worlds: a character at a low point is a character who neglects to trim their hedges. A home renovation in a novel often signals a character in transition. In my novel, The Perfect Home, home renovation is slightly different: it’s the audience-facing occupation of husband-and-wife reality TV stars with a renovation show, fixing up other peoples’ houses. Meanwhile, their own suburban Nashville home sits curiously empty.
The idea is to fill it with children. But their challenges—and successes—in doing so end up unraveling the veneer of wholesome home-renovation entertainment they’ve portrayed to the world.
A piece of real estate as subject matter for a novel might not have obvious appeal. Yet somehow it does. It makes sense on a hierarchy-of-needs level: food and shelter are universal experiences, so we watch cooking and renovation shows with fascination.It’s fun to fantasize about how we’d renovate our homes if we had the resources of the characters in these books. It’s fun to imagine what secrets lurk behind the non-load-bearing walls we tear down.
And in the novels below, authors have skillfully used unique real estate situations for all sorts of literary purposes: metaphors, side plots, symbols, and entanglements. It’s everything that makes a novel superior entertainment. (Nothing against reality TV).
“My sister has been dead for nearly fifteen years when I see her on the TV news.” The book begins with one of those cannon-shot openers you know is going to maintain momentum all story long. The long-lost sister is (spoilers) “Mari” now, building an alternative life in New Zealand. Her exploration of a historical house doubles as exploration of her new life. The old house is, to readers, just as mysterious as Mari’s reasons for leaving.
Barbara O’Neal has a knack for taking domestic situations and breathing so much life into the balloon of the story’s emotional stakes that it becomes a page-turner just to see what’s going to pop. In When We Believed in Mermaids, much of the emotional work requires digging up the past—sort of like getting a new appraisal on a property that’s been sitting there for decades.
After her mother’s death, a woman returns to her childhood home. There’s clutter. Evidence of hoarding. The realities of the house serve as evidence of mental illness and the trauma that existed there, a major theme throughout the book. Much like the family it contained, the house looks nice on the inside while the inside is a puzzle of messy secrets that take an entire book to unspool.
It’s not so much a renovation as a de-cluttering project, but the effect is the same. Restoring the beauty of the house—if indeed they ever do—is only possible after untangling the emotions of affairs and tragedies that led to its state of disrepair.
The protagonist, Hattie Kavanaugh, restores homes for a living and gets the opportunity to star in a home renovation show—The Homewreckers. One of the unpleasant surprises during one Tybee Island renovation isn’t termites in the walls—it’s evidence about a disappearance. It’s a genre-blending book where an innocent reality TV show becomes something very different in the eyes of the public.
Having an apartment like the three main characters in Write My Name Across the Sky is unusual. The novel makes constant reference to what a lucky purchase it had been—Manhattan property values being what they are—and the setting doubles as the glue connecting three wayward family members. These three—two daughters and one sister of a deceased songwriter—are, in some ways, are only united by their relation to the woman behind the titular song that paid for the apartment in the first place.
When one character suggests selling this apartment, it feels like such a betrayal of family trust that we feel for the other characters who’d prefer to live there. The apartment is a relic of a lost loved one, a longtime home for Aunt Gloria, and temporary shelter for the talented Willow. That Sam eventually comes around to its appeal says more about her journey than it does the apartment’s.
Dan and Hayley Daley inherit a rundown Victorian-era farmhouse: an easy profit if they can fix it up. Naturally, there’s not a novel there if it’s going to be that easy. What’s unique here is that the house is less a metaphor than a rich mine for all the frustrating—and even funny—challenges of trying to update a house that just doesn’t want to be renovated.
The Last Thing He Told Me begins in a floating home, and the metaphor there is a life about to be swept away in the current. What a great choice, because the effect is instant: Owen’s mysterious “Protect her” letter kicks off a story with riverine momentum. The search unites Hannah and Bailey—not related by blood but through Owen—the same way the floating home forced them into living in close quarters.
A literal House of Horrors here as the protagonist, Maggie Holt, inherits the mansion that had inspired her late father to write a bestselling book about the haunted house. Finding out the causes of the haunting feel a bit like demo day during a renovation—you’re never sure what’s going to turn up behind the walls. The House of Horrors book-within-a-book is a fun way to unravel the mysteries here, including a collapsed kitchen ceiling that reveal a secret love affair. You know. Standard demo day stuff.
Good Girl—the debut novel by award-winning poet Aria Aber—follows nineteen-year-old Nila as she becomes charmed in a Berlin club and falls manically in love with Marlowe, an older brooding American writer. Raised by Afghan refugees, Nila’s childhood remains haunted by the shadows of exile while she yearns to be free and to live life outside of the realms of her room. She follows friends and strangers into dark warehouses and neon dancefloors, and soon stumbles upon an upper echelon world alongside Berlin’s underground scene, finding out that both orbit around art, sex, drugs, God, and secrets. “The club wasn’t really called the Bunker, but that’s what I will call it, because that’s how we experienced it: a shelter from the war of our daily lives, a building in which the history of this city, this country, was being corroded under our feet, where the machines of our bodies could roam free and dream.”
Aber’s novel might be considered a künstlerroman and a bildungsroman. The portrait of the young photographer. A story about an artist becoming herself. But what happens when that self is obscured in lies, grief, and shame? What if the identity she is becoming is only an image of someone else entirely, then what might one be left with in adulthood? Above all, Good Girl proves itself to be much more layered than a genre-defined künstlerroman or bildungsroman. It is a complex, multidimensional story—not only a coming-of-age but a poetic journey that traces a young photographer’s political awakening and how she finds her voice amongst a tsunami of influences. As Nila discovers what it means to be the person you are, she too discovers what it means for that identity to be true.
Between philosophical dialogues and debates on aesthetics and Marxism, the novel is also consistently laced with gorgeous prose, pills, and parties occurring in almost every chapter. However, the real grit and grime of Good Girl lies in what goes unsaid. It’s buried in the silent glimpses and unspoken conversations that pass across the room of wealthy elites at a German fundraiser for Afghan dogs, or the news on a television that plays in the background of Berlin’s bakeries and cafés, or the quiet curiosity Nila feels while wandering Venice as “an uneasy tourist” in a foreign city for the first time—unsure of what to do and how to travel without a purpose or a family member’s funeral.
I spoke to Aria Aber, a poet, about her transition into prose and writing about a pulsing, provocative narrative of a girl growing up, falling down, and rising into the storyteller she was always meant to become
Kyla D. Walker: How did that transition from poetry to prose go for you? And why did you decide to write the novel?
Aria Aber: I started writing the novel in 2020 when I moved back to Berlin because I didn’t have any health insurance here in the U.S. I rented this small apartment in my old neighborhood there. And, of course, the world was shut down. I went on daily walks through the streets where there were all these clubs that I used to frequent a decade prior. And I was overcome with a sense of grief. On the one hand, for the world at large because of the pandemic and all the political upheaval that was happening that year. And on the other hand, it was a very private type of grief for a friend who had passed away. This sense, the inevitable sense of loss, activated my consciousness to an extent where I was experiencing all of these memories and sensations. Some of these chapters, or the first draft, of Good Girl really just poured out of me. Berlin, of course, is such a major character in the novel and being in the city physically led to me focusing the story in Berlin in particular.
I knew that it had to be a novel because I wanted to explore one character’s consciousness and their power dynamics with other characters, which is a little harder to do in poetry—at least in the poetry that I write, which is usually lyrical and focused on a very particular moment of epiphany or realization. And you can’t really maintain the sense of linearity—and political awakening that is important in the novel—within one poem. I also didn’t want to draw too much attention to the form of the book, which is why I decided not to write a novel in verse, which would have been a possibility. But a novel in verse always brings up the conversation of verse versus linearity, so prose allows you to hide the form a little more.
KW: There’s a line that says: “…Nabokov, on the other hand, was one of my favorite writers. He wrote with a lushness that embraced both beauty and irony. I always thought that the poetic intensity of his style stemmed from the fact that he was exiled in English, that he excavated the strangeness of English because he was a foreigner in it.” I just thought that shows how the book is conceptually concerned with the nuances of language: its barriers and the exclusivity and/or accessibility that language can create. Did you know from the start you needed to write this novel originally in English?
I personally think of beauty as something violent rather than just pretty and easily observed.
AA Yes. I always knew that this would have to be written in English, primarily because at the time when I started writing this book, I had made my career in the English language. But I also wanted to highlight the fact that the protagonist, because it is written in first person, is not native to the English language in order to draw attention to the textures and foreignness of the way that I deal with the English language in particular. There is a version of my life in which I might have written this novel in German. And I ended up translating it myself into German. However, all of my writing—be it poetry orfiction or even nonfiction—starts with a melody in my mind that I then translate into language. So it felt the most natural to me to write it in English. I was also invested in discussing two different types of immigrants in the book. On the one hand, we have Nila as this character who is a refugee and who is born in Germany. And, on the other hand, we have an American expat: Marlowe Woods, who sits on the other end of the spectrum as a voluntary economic migrant. I was interested in highlighting the differences of how they are being perceived by German society and the kinds of privileges or disadvantages each of them experience.
KW: My next question is tied to what you mentioned in the way that Nila sees herself throughout the novel. There’s this quote on page 13 that says, “Beauty was a tragic virtue, often abused because we are fooled by it. But I emanated something darker, something uglier. Like a fraught hunger for life.” Does this view of beauty leak into Nila’s photographic perspective on top of how she sees herself? And then does that tragic virtue of beauty carry over into how she selects which images to take?
AA: I think her understanding of beauty is skewed in some ways because she thinks of herself as ugly and undesirable and yet understands that she has some sense of power within her that’s attractive to other people—especially to someone like Marlowe, which I think is her voracious hunger for life. And beauty I personally think of it as something violent rather than just pretty and easily observed. I think of beautyas related to the sublime. So when you experience something that is beautiful, you areoverwhelmed with the sensation of being at the receiving end of it. It might change something in you. It might awaken something in you. It might lead you down a very different path. There are many different ways in which this manifests within the conversations and the thoughts that Nila has in the novel. Beauty can be experienced, I think, when you read a book as well as just being at a party and surrounded by many people. Ultimately the beauty—in a very philosophical and aesthetic sense—that I’m talking about here is a beauty of change and experience that might unlatch something within you. But beauty, and that particular quote that you read, I think, relates to a sense of attractiveness that is more classical that she doesn’t feel connected to.
KW: Speaking of the sublime, too, I was very moved by the role that religion plays throughout Good Girl and this idea of how faith can act as a wall between characters and cause separation. It seems that Nila almost wishes her parents, and especially her mother, had been more religious while she was growing up. I’m curious how this desire and this hope of hers complicate the notion of being “a good girl” or in fact rebelling against that idea.
AA: There are two ways in which I thought about faith in the novel. The first is organized religion, which is not very present in Nila’s nuclear family and which she yearns for because she seeks structure and rules and a very rigid way of experiencing the world. As a person in exile, especially so early on, where she experiences her family to be kind of adolescents as well—not knowing which rules to carry over, whichones to implement—leaves her in a state of confusion and dislocation and only adds to the already quite destabilizing sensations of being a young person in the world. And on the other hand, I think my personal relationship to God and faith—and I instilled a little bit of that in Nila too—is the yearning to be part of something bigger than yourself and to dissolve yourself with a higheressence, which is actually very mystical in nature. She seeks God everywhere, and she doesn’t always find that connection even though, of course, raves and the excessive party culture that she fashions her life around, as well as using consciousness-expanding drugs, allow her to simulate a part of that religious feeling or oceanic feeling. I guess I was interested in the dichotomy between excess and abstinence, between strict rules and unabashed hedonism, and the two drives thatpsychologically manifest in Nila. She’s such a person of extremes. On the one hand, there is this feeling of Eros and the life drive that is leading her down a path ofDionysian filth. Then on the other hand, there is Thanatos, the death drive that makes her a little ashamed and wishes she didn’t exist at all.And the only times when she feels a certain amount of peace within herself and not absolutely overtaken by extremes is when she feels at one with the world, which ultimately is a moment of quietness that we sometimes experience in prayers.
KW: Throughout the novel, there are also these really interesting discussions of fascism, Marxism, aesthetic theory, and gentrification—with Eli studying architecture and Doreen’s activism, among other things that come up. In these scenes in particular, the socioeconomic statuses of the characters start to become clearer and the different ways their perspectives have been formed in Berlin. So, for these characters, what do you think might be the role of the artist within these larger political ideologies?
AA: I don’t think the novel provides a very clear answer on what the responsibility of the artist is. However, I personally—as a very political person—think thatwe do have a responsibility to the world at large regardless of whether we’re artists or not. I don’t think that aesthetics exist in a vacuum divorced from ethics. I think these two things inform each other constantly. And what I wanted to achieve in this novel is to create a character who does get changed by the world, right? Her artistic awakening is subtly linked to her political awakening at the very end. After the NSU violence is uncovered, she has this moment where she’s looking at a photograph of her father and his cousins and a couple of her uncles on a hill in Kabul, and one of the cousins has a camcorder in his hand. But for a moment, she thinks he’s holding a rifle. And that moment to her, I think, is crucial because it’s integral to the sensation that she is part of something bigger than herself. And I don’t discuss this overtly in the novel—what that means symbolically. Mistaking it for a rifle, mistaking it for a machinery of violence that could kill but is actually also just a piece of technology similar to the one that she has chosen as her art medium: a camcorder or a camera. So I do think that those two things are linked, and we at least owe it to the world to let it change us, even if as artists we don’t make art that would be considered political on the surface or didactic in any way.
KW: I wanted us to talk a little bit about what you mentioned about the violence in Berlin, the National Socialist Underground murders. That chapter was so powerful and tragic and especially moved me personally. I’m so thankful that you wrote about it. How did it feel and what was the experience like of writing about these real events that intertwined with the fictional? Was that history inescapable for this story?
AA: It was inescapable, one-hundred percent, because I wanted to write a story that is set at that particular time. And, looking back, it feels like a failed opportunity for Germany to wake up in some way and see itself as the country that it is, which has not very much evolved from where it was many, many decades ago, even though it prides itself on things such as memory culture and having accepted and dealt with its past, with its very racist past, in a good way. I justremember being a young person at that time and feeling the sense of confirmation for all the fears that I was raised with, that I had suspected to be true but hoped secretly might not be true. And I also knew that I wanted to write a novel that ends with an act of right-wing violence. Even beforeI had set on how, I had settled on the timeline and mainly because there aren’t enough, I think, of these kinds of stories and it is a fear that I always harbor that this is just around the corner and will happen. The way I fictionalized it in the novel is to include the burning and the murders: the burning of the bakery and the murders of those two Afghan bakers in Berlin in particular. Because most of the other things that I write about in the novel are actualoccurrences, I wanted to dramatize it for the sake of the narrative and make it closer to Nila’s own life so that she would be forced to experience a political awakening. Having this story be more removed from her as it transpired in real life would have maybe not felt urgent enough for the psychology of this character in particular because she’s so reluctant to accept herself as a politicized body within the world that she inhabits. But also, I didn’t want to spend too much time discussing the murders of real people because it’s still very close to me, and I wanted to be respectful to the actual victims and not sensationalize their deaths, which is why I chose to create a fictional event at the very end. It is such a painful moment in German history.
KW: Now diving a bit deeper into the relationship between Nila and Marlowe, there’s this sense of the shadow of exile that haunts Nila and her parents after they’ve left Afghanistan and are starting their new lives in Berlin. And we talked a bit earlier about this as well—how Marlowe was also an immigrant in Germany though comes from a very different background, but still finds some similarities with Nila. Later, the relationship turns out to be quite toxic and abusive. I’m curious how geopolitics might be playing a role in this particular relationship. How have war and imperialist forces affected the dynamics between them, if at all?
AA: Interestingly, when I first sketched out the novel, I was inspired by Nabokov’s treatment of Lolita. He said, when he set out to write that book, that he was thinking of the characters Humbert and Lolita as the Old World versus the New World—with Lolita representing America and Humbert representing Europe in some way, and how they interact with each other. I don’t think that ultimately manifests in the novel in any productive way, but it’s an interesting framework to think of as a surface, right? And when I set out to write Good Girl, I thought about including this American character in order to also symbolize American imperialism and how it has affected the world and Afghanistan in particular at that time.
This was a great starting out point, even though it became less and less relevant the more fleshed out Marlowe as a character became. I think it definitely plays a role in the ways they interact with each other because he has all of these privileges that he is more or less unaware of, right? He speaks the lingua franca of the world. He’s a white man. He can move through rooms without being detected as a foreigner, which Nila cannot. And yet, at the same time, there is this almost paradoxical yearning for America within Nila herself, but also in her father and her family who are attached to this very antiquated idea of the land of freedom, where anything is possible, which they don’t see for themselves in Germany… I was interested in the nuances of that and how they manifest in her family and why she’s attracted to Marlowe in particular. Part of it is that he is from California, which is the state that her father idolizes so there is that connection and an inherited fascination with the landscape of the West that he brings into her life. And on the other hand, he is also symbolic of everything that she yearns for in terms of artistic freedom and a life that is not dictated by rules but is rather lived in freedom.
One other thing that is quite interesting to me is that Nila, early on in the novel, says that she sees an image of Marlowe in a magazine beforehand and that she remembers that photograph which has made a big impact on her. So she’s quite literally enamored of his image—the surface and everything that he represents there. And the more she gets to know him, the more the image crumbles. He becomes weaker and less successful, or less confident, whereas she gains a sense of confidence and artistic voice. So, their arcs are opposed to each other, which psychologically is very interesting, even though it doesn’t necessarily function with the parallelism of the nation states and how they represent those.
KW: Throughout the book there are several mentions of writers that Nila is reading and being influenced by. Who are some of the writers you were influenced by while writing Good Girl and do they overlap with Nila’s?
AA: Interestingly, the writers that Nila mentions were notpart of my personal syllabus that I used while writing Good Girl. Because I don’t have an MFA in fiction and didn’t have classical training, I had to teach myself how to write a novel. I read a lot of Jean Rhys and Marguerite Duras and James Baldwin because all three of them write these protagonists who are adrift in various cityscapes. So urban melancholia was something that I was trying to learn how to bring across on the page, and at the same time, also this feeling of insatiable desire and erotic fulfillment that they also often seek and don’t always manage to find in other people. So, the sense of loneliness and being adrift in a city was something that I learned, or tried to copy, from those writers.
1: difference in latitude to the south from the last preceding point of reckoning
2: southerly progress
The cicadas began to arrive in the South in May. I suppose “arrive” is the wrong word, as the insects had been in the yard for two years already when my parents bought the property back in 2006, their bodies buried eight or more feet deep in the soil, insect clocks set to a seventeen-year timer. They’d grown older in our unwitting company, outlasting two chickens, four goldfish, three graduating seniors, and at least a couple hundred rabbits. Like billions of their brethren across the country, the cicadas were now emerging in their blackened, red-eyed old age, tymbal subwoofers pumping out this endless, dirge-like song.
“These bugs are seventeen years old,” I tell my mother. “The same age as Airik.”
“Oh really?” she says, actually impressed. “He’s been eating them. I hope they taste good.”
Mom is showing me around the backyard as Airik the shepherd-chow mix shuffles along in our wake, a belly full of his contemporaries. Almost two years have passed since last I came south. While I was away, my younger sister graduated and moved north for college, leaving my parents with an empty nest. Dad has gotten into home surveillance. He’s acquired a fleet of drones which he uses to take aerial snapshots of the neighborhood. (One went AWOL in a neighbor’s tree, and Dad’s been too embarrassed to walk over and ask for it back.) Then there’s the cheap cameras he’s placed around the house, their live footage streamable on his phone. Each night since the pandemic began, Dad’s sent the family group text a screen grab from one of his feeds—usually a pixelated image of Airik asleep on the porch—accompanied by the same, repeating message of “Good night and good luck!”
Mom, for her part, has pivoted from childrearing to plant husbandry. She shows me the vegetable beds out back, each haphazardly planted with Chinese watercress, Chinese chives, Chinese eggplants, tomatoes, strawberries, coriander, a lone bitter melon, some swollen peppers and shriveled string beans. There are white irises in bloom all around us, and a big metal pail filled with dark water and what I think must be lilies.
During the years my siblings and I were growing up here, my parents never seemed to take a shine to the South. They never went on hikes in the Smoky mountains like they do now, or kayaked in the flooded quarry just south of downtown, or had the time to get involved with neighborhood beautification. And yet, I don’t remember them ever complaining about feeling isolated either. “It was very simple,” Dad tells me. He had a three-point plan when he came here: study hard, get a job, raise a family in America—a plan he has executed up to this point. When I ask him if he ever felt unwelcome in Tennessee, he responds adamantly in the negative. Back then Japan was America’s main economic rival, and in his account, Americans thought of China, not Japan, as their main ally in the East. “I always think immigration is the key thing,” he says; letting migrants in should be “compulsory,” as long as the immigrants are as diligent as him.
My father became a citizen the moment he was eligible, and when money was no longer a problem, he and my mother acquired green cards for their parents so they could visit us whenever they wished. The long-term goal was always to bring the whole family over, to have my grandparents and uncles and cousins all settle in Tennessee. That never worked out—not least of which because China is no longer a place that highly-educated Chinese people feel they need to leave. Growing up, I always thought that maybe my parents were lonely here in the South, and that maybe if they’d made more of an effort to assimilate, not just in terms of citizenship, but culture, they wouldn’t have missed their family so much that they needed their family to come over here.
What friends my parents had when I was young were all drawn from the small and frequently drained pool of local Chinese immigrants—friends who were always decamping for other states or reverse migrating back to China. My parents sometimes speak of following suit after they retire, of pulling up stakes like the cicadas are doing now, circling back to the dappled treetops where their own, cyclical lives began. A Chinese treatise on war, the one not written by Sun Tzu, describes a maneuver known as “Slough off the Cicada’s Golden Shell,” in which a retreating force leaves a copy of itself behind on the battlefield to confuse a gullible opponent. Right now, my parents’ backyard is covered in these decoys. They crunch like packing peanuts beneath my feet.
If my parents ever did go back to China, I’d feel like one of the decoys: an amber-colored molt left behind by my predecessors. These shells seem more intact than former selves have any right to be, each with a telltale tear by the head through which their wearers got away. Seeing my parents’ yard covered in cicada shells was reason enough to come home this summer: how a skin deprived of its body still stands, clinging crab-like to fence posts and stems. One brisk rain might wash them away, but up until now, they’ve stayed.
My mind is often drifting southwards even as my body stays sequestered in the North.
I was born and raised in the American South, in a suburb of Knoxville called Farragut. For ten of the past fourteen years, I’ve lived in New England, with the remaining four split between China and Arizona. Yet none of these places have felt like a permanent backdrop to my life in the way that East Tennessee once did. I know this because my mind is often drifting southwards even as my body stays sequestered in the North.I’ll be riding the subway, looking absentmindedly down the length of the train car, and suddenly the entire locomotive spyglass will be filled with this verdigris flush, a green that rushes along beneath the city on unseen tracks, reminding me, invariably, of the South. In other words, the trigger is environmental: the way the air is balanced today, the glossy depth of a field my partner and I pass while driving from one Boston suburb to the next, looking for passable dim sum. This field will look, in the brief glimpse of it I can catch, fresh, perfect, unmown.
And so we come to the crux of the matter: a Southern field I once knew. I hesitate to even describe this field, as it really was a prosaic space, a pastoral interlude in the middle of suburbia, as neutral and inviting as only a field can be. Obviously there was grass in this field; that, and a few trees. I cannot call up specific names for those trees, nor for the many birds, reptiles, and insects that, in addition to me and the cows, must have inhabited that space. Knowing the field in that way never interested me. The field was this outside space, one I did not wish to assimilate into my world, even as I spent hours exploring its expanse. Nowadays, I consider that field—or rather, my attachment to it—as possibly the most Southern thing about me. Although I lack most of the outward tells of Southernness, which is to say I speak unaccented English and have a face that is neither white nor black but yellow, that field places me in the South. My memories of it are full-body ones: overgrown, terrestrial, musical as any sentence by my hometown’s literary hero James Agee, lit up like a landscape shot by Sally Mann.
I used to practice wushu out in the field, far away from all my neighbors’ prying eyes, stretching and high kicking and making patterns with my limbs. For years, I’ve had this recurring dream where I’m back there, dressed in my East Tennessee Wushu Team uniform of sky blue polyester, alone and running. It’s dawn or early evening, the field’s grassy swells covered in fog, and as I run, I start leaping at the crest of each earthen wavelet, and these leaps keep stretching out until I am gliding through air like the warriors in Wuxia films do, a body no longer in touch with the ground, predisposed toward flight.
While I’m no expert at dream analysis, the subconscious speaks pretty loudly in this one. I loved that field, but that field belonged to someone else, a farmer who owned the cattle and harvested the hay. Technically speaking, I was a trespasser on this man’s property, and so my relationship to his field might as well be my relationship to the South as a whole: an enduring fidelity I feel for a space I could never, fully own.
I’ve been thinking more than usual about this: the place which Asians do or don’t have in that part of America which gets defined as the South. Most of the scholars I’ve consulted on the topic tell me that “Asian America” and “the South” rarely, if ever, converge, making the Asians at the center of this Venn Diagram seem like poor navigators, honorary Californians who somehow wound up in Tennessee. There are many reasons for this incongruence (what the editors of an anthology called Asian Americans in Dixie refer to as the Asian Southerner’s “discrepant” status). One is simple demographics. Even though Southern cities like Atlanta and Houston boast large and rapidly growing Asian communities, proportionally fewer Asians live in the South than in the West or Northeast. Another factor might be spin. Asian Americans are consistently seen and represented, even by ourselves, as “new” Americans, and the spaces and timelines we populate are reliably contemporary or futuristic. We are proprietary products, that is, of the long 20th century as well as harbingers of the 21st. Our Oort cloud of associations includes “fusion cuisine,” “forgotten wars,” “globalization,” “foreign imports,” “software engineer,” and “R&D.” On the other hand, the South and its people are famously anti-progressive, old and loamy and deeply rooted in all things. Despite all the hubbub about so-called “New Souths,” Southern identity is perceived by most to be marooned in the before times, somewhere betwixt Civil War and Civil Rights. Asians were here in the South back then as well (see the “Manilla men” of the Louisiana bayous, the handful of indentured coolies who labored on Southern plantations, the eight thousand plus Japanese incarcerated in Arkansas during WWII), and yet our historical presence in these parts has been easy to forget, our present-day contributions limited to a smattering of Indian-owned motels and Chinese-owned grocers.
Asians can rarely tell where they fit within the South’s racial pecking order.
As the critic Leslie Bow writes, Asians in the South have long occupied a kind of “social limbo, a segregation from segregation,” by which she means that Asians can rarely tell where they fit within the South’s racial pecking order. One could of course make the same argument about Asians elsewhere in this country. Outside of a few urban enclaves, aren’t most Asian communities so small as to barely register within any local patchwork of social relations? Perhaps the aberrancy of Asians in the South is simply a difference in degree, then—we feel more like a minority here than elsewhere, and so more existentially adrift. But the difference also has to do with how the South has itself been framed as a space apart, home to the obese, the poor, and the excessively religious; the bigots and the rednecks; the winsome folk singers and daredevil Davy Crocketts. This vast and heterogeneous region has so often been held up and put down as a different, phantasmal America, and so being Asian in this space means embodying an exception within the exception—an anomaly, squared.
One core tenet of Southern distinctiveness is the intense, almost maudlin connection good Southerners are supposed to feel for the land they were raised on. As a college student in the North, I once attended the office hours of a teaching assistant who’d also grown up in the Tennessee Valley. White Southerners I knew at my school often spoke of feeling out of place there, outclassed by an even older WASP elite. (Some of these Southerners even banded together to form a short-lived “Southern Culture Club,” spearheaded by a girl I knew from my freshman dorm who claimed direct descent from Robert E. Lee.) My teacher probably had little interest in discussing Southern identity politics with me, but she also didn’t balk when I asked her about her upbringing in East Tennessee. She told me she’d grown up on a farm north of Fountain City with chickens and goats and brothers who shot squirrels, and said that it was only after she, too, left the South for college that she realized hers was not a “normal” American upbringing. Most of the people my teacher knew growing up were only one or two generations removed from agrarian life. This closeness to the land, or at least the land’s memory, was what distinguished Southerners from everyone else.
Perhaps this is also why the confluence of Southernness and Asianness has continued to elude me. The former is premised on land: stolen land, broken land, land which has been worked over for generations, but land nonetheless. The latter—if it’s built on anything at all—is built on dislocation and diaspora, on the dispersed and fragile networks forged by those who’ve learned to dwell in spaces few and far between.
This is all to say that there are Asian people in the South, millions of them, in fact, but that doesn’t mean they feel Southern.
On the screen porch in Farragut, I sit with the dog and the sweltering air. I rock back and forth in the chair as sunlight sews clever little embroideries into a white wooden table. This is the table where I learned how to write—you can still see the imprint of old words, both Chinese and English, grooved onto its surface—and also the table where I once laid a dead king snake after a long walk through the field, its sleek length banded black and white, one of those perfect found objects of summer.
Airik’s old, but he’s only recently begun to show it. He’s acquired a few things since last I saw him: rheumy eyes, occasional fits of flatulence, a custom-built staircase with a railing leading down into the yard (no one with hands ever uses these stairs, but my parents’ home insurers insisted on the railing for liability reasons). Petting him as he pants, I pick three or four ticks out of his fur, each like a botoxed raisin.
Here we are: a man and his dog on the porch, listening to cicadas. Is there any configuration more Southern than that?
Since none of my friends live in town anymore, I spend most of my time at home just driving around, indulging my private nostalgia while playing the part of the Asian tourist. I go to places I never paid much attention to when I lived here, places called “Founder’s Park” and the “Farragut Folklife Museum” inside of town hall, where one can admire an oil portrait of David Farragut—first admiral of the U.S. Navy, born not far from this spot!—and scope out his wife’s collection of fine china. I even go into Knoxville itself, my hometown’s recently resurgent core: Gay Street and Market Square, a weather kiosk installed in 1912 that no longer tells the weather. I visit one boring municipal museum, and then another, loiter about a park commemorating James Agee just down the street from my parents’ first American apartment. There is a sign by the river welcoming pandemic travelers. “For the Love of Knoxville. Travel Safe. Stay Safe.”
I guess this is “the South,” or my slice of it at least. My South is that austral shiver I get when I hear Dolly Parton’s “The Bridge.” It’s the mountains blued out by distance which are permanently fixed into a folksy still-life in the back of my mind. It’s the field: the field as it was, and as it is. When I’m back in this South, I’m always trying to parse where myth and land part ways. At the Museum of Appalachia, I walk around a barn dubbed the “Appalachian Hall of Fame,” squinting at all the writing on the wall: “These are our people. World renowned, unknown, famous, infamous, interesting, diverse, different. But above all, they are a warm, colorful, and jolly lot. In love with our land, our mountains, our culture.” The barn is stuffed with quilts and old photographs, mandolins with frayed strings, the kind of apocrypha (e.g., a child’s sled owned by the founder of Dunkin Donuts, who years ago vacationed in East Tennessee) that only such institutions care to retain. Here there is a corner devoted to “Misc & Unusual Indian Artifacts,” and beyond that, a bunch of placarded exhibits bearing the colorful stories of Appalachian Hall of Famers, stories like that of Asa Jackson’s “Fabulous Perpetual Motion Machine” and “Old ‘Saupaw’ the Cave Dwelling Hermit and his Little Hanging Cabinet.”
None of these stories speak of Appalachian Asians, or of Asians in the broader South. There is no such “representation” to be had at this museum, unless you count, as I do, the kudzu vines conquering all the nearby trees or the Indian peafowl roaming the grounds, pecking away at some invisible prey.
Several decades ago, another Asian named Choong Soon Kim came to the South in order to study it. Much like my own parents, Kim arrived here as a doctoral student. He wanted to write a treatise on Southern culture, a deep dive into “the ‘innards’ of the South” as told through the refracting lens of race. The resulting book—An Asian Anthropologist in the South: Field Experiences with Blacks, Indians, and Whites—is not so much an objective account of Southern race relations as it is a reflection of how one Asian anthropologist was received in the South.
That reception was not always a warm one. Children followed Kim down the streets of Georgia, chanting “Chinaman, Chinaman.” Multiple informants, mostly educated whites, refused to shake Kim’s hand or answer any of his questions, even as they spoke deferentially to his white colleagues. Someone broke into Kim’s motel room to steal his field notes and left a threatening note on his car. At one point, a cop bluntly told Kim that no foreigner from an “underdeveloped” country should have the gall to question Americans about their ways. And yet Kim refuses to interpret any of these events as racially motivated, writing in his book’s epilogue: “I wish to emphasize that I have never been subjected to [racial discrimination] during my ten years of living in the South.”
Confident as Kim may have been that he had never experienced Southern racism firsthand, he nonetheless concludes that Asianness and Southernness are immiscible entities. Unlike the white anthropologist who tries to “go native,” Kim realized in the field that it was more expedient for him to play up his foreignness. Southerners were more likely to help him with directions and talk his ear off, slowly, about local happenings if they perceived him as a temporary irritant rather than a potential fellow citizen. Kim’s method for getting by in the South was thus to strategically orientalize himself, to “conform to the role of the stereotyped Asian both in my field work and in all other aspects of my life.”
It’s that “all other aspects of my life” bit that gets me, how someone can learn to flourish in a place without ever integrating into its fabric. Although Kim would spend more than three decades in the South before returning to Korea; although he raised his children here; although he owned property in the South, presumably paid taxes to a Southern state, and taught a generation’s worth of Southern students at UT Martin, where he was a professor of sociology until 2001, Kim never came around to seeing himself as a Southerner. It was like his time in the field began the moment he came to the South and didn’t finish until he left it: a thirty-six-year study completed by one “nonimmersed Asian ethnographer.”
I’ve been trying to remind myself on this latest Southern journey that my life and project are not the same as Kim’s, even if both of us link the South in our minds to a field both abstract and real. He stood outside or above it, his field site, trying to master its conditions. I’ve long wanted the opposite: to have the field master me.
Perhaps what I’m delineating is just a generational difference. Kim is my parents, or at least the stereotyped version of them I’ve constructed for easy consumption (terse and hard-working neo-Confucians, unconcerned with social justice and connected always to the old country), while I am their offspring, equally troped: this flighty layabout overfull of misplaced identifications; this second-gen wandering heart desperate to belong.
It seems too direct to ask my parents if they feel like Southerners now, thirty-five years after my father’s arrival. The answer, I fear, is liable to be yes and no at once. My mother tells me that when she moved here, she didn’t really consider how Tennessee might be different from anywhere else in America. And yet being here has changed her. “I think mostly in English now,” she tells me. It took many years for that to happen, but now the sounds in our minds are the same. I ask her if she found it difficult when I was young to communicate with me, a no-brainer kind of question that right after I say it makes us both laugh. “You think it’s hard?” she says, turning the question back on me. I lie and tell her I don’t remember.
Kim reports meeting someone like me in the course of his fieldwork, a Korean American born in the South named Wilson that Kim chastises as only a disappointed parent can. “He appeared Oriental, but knew nothing about the Orient.” And yet this young, oriental man, Southern drawl and all, could also not pass muster as Southern. By the Asian anthropologist’s standards, Wilson was a cultural mongrel lacking any “clearcut identity,” a con artist who didn’t even know he was running a con, this “marginal man belonging nowhere.”
It would be easy for me to compare my own Asian Southernness to bad improv, a mug’s game of representations in which what I’m taken for is rarely what I am. Due to the legacy of redlining, my public school and the tony suburb it served were both overwhelmingly white (Black Knoxvillians all lived in North or East Knoxville and attended schools we suburbanites disparaged as “inner city”). So, yes, what Asians there were in Farragut did stick out, and there were times when I thought of us, me and all the Asians I knew, as propertied squatters with no valid claim to this non-Asian place—a place I had the misfortune of loving as much as I did.
Still, it’s important for me to note that my own Asian identity did not form inside of a vacuum. My parents were early members of the East Tennessee Chinese Association, founded in 1992, and through that association’s various functions, had introduced me to other Chinese immigrants and their kids, some of whom have remained my lifelong friends. The things that bonded me to my fellow Chinese Knoxvillians were not just the strong nuclear forces of race and class and city. It was the baroque specificity of any scene within a scene, all these things I thought no one outside of our tiny East Tennessee x China enclave could understand, things like our aunts smuggling over seeds from Zhejiang; our mothers’ late nineties traffic in VCR tapes, all of Michelle Kwan; or that sigh of relief some of us breathed when it turned out we sucked at violin. It was the lopsided satellites on our porches that gave our visiting grandparents’ access to CCTV, and the better than passable Sichuan restaurant known as Hong Kong House, RIP, which used to sit like an MSG-laced beachhead by Tennessee’s first official state road. It was the miasmic, soul-crushing boredom of Sunday Chinese School weighed against the ethnocentric delights of parties we poopooed to our white friends but secretly relished. It was the magnificent sprawl of those parties, the pool of slip-on shoes at the door, the potluck contributions that deified their casserole containers, the mellifluous blend of Mando-pop karaoke and Super Smash Bros. Melee. It was the dads getting trashed at the weiqi table as the moms counted cards in the kitchen. It was learning the rules to all our parents’ games, but still sticking to Spades instead.
It was also the fact that one day we’d all leave. Whatever this milieu of ours was, it could not be reconciled with where we were, for where we were was in the South. I remember a night right after graduation when I took all my Asian friends with me to the field. We dragged a bunch of hay bales together into a circle, piled all our homework from AP Physics and AP U.S. History and AP Calculus in the middle of that circle, and then we set our homework on fire, because there was a lot of it, and the A’s we’d made no longer mattered. I don’t know what everyone was thinking that night at the bonfire of nerd vanities, but I’m pretty sure it had something to do with how we’d all be gone by summer’s end, off to some college north or west of here. This field in the South could not be ours. This field in the South had been caked on in stygian layers, sedimented in stories of decrepitude and succession, in histories always on the edge of forgetting and Southern people laid low by the weight of their benighted land. We would not be those people. We would be fleet of foot, pecunious. We would run until our yellow and brown bodies were lighter than Southern air, air that everyone knows is heavy.
But that’s only half of the story, the half I’ve been too eager to tell. In all my years of practicing wushu, the move I most wanted to master was called an aerial, a cartwheel performed in midair. I always started the move perfectly, my legs tossing up above me, my arms and shoulders relaxed as I somersaulted into flight. Then something in me would falter. My eyes would make contact with the field below. My hand would shoot down to touch it.
In the town of Rocky Top, Tennessee, I walk past rows of trailer houses, each with at least two “NO TRESPASSING” signs posted. Rocky Top used to be called Lake City before the local council brokered a deal with an investor who wanted to build a water park nearby. The investor promised to sink $100 million into the project, but only if the residents of Lake City agreed to rename their town “Rocky Top” after Tennessee’s official state song. Following a legal skirmish with the estate of the song’s writers, Lake City succeeded at renaming itself Rocky Top—as in “Rocky Top, you’ll always be / Home sweet home to me”—in 2014. The $100 million dollar water park, however, has yet to materialize.
It’s the middle of a hot day, and even the children are sheltering in place. The Thursday special at the Vol’s Diner is catfish, and the antiques store with the native effigy out front just closed. I’m walking past a gas station, feeling light-headed from caffeine, when the thing that always happens starts happening to me. (I don’t mean “always happens in the South,” as these scenes do not discriminate by region.) “Hey,” says a youngish white man biking on the sidewalk, and I’m already crossing the street, hoping my dodge wasn’t too obvious.
“Hey you,” he says again. “Do you understand what I’m saying?”
I walk faster, and the man starts to follow me on his bike. “Motherfucker!” he yells now. “Motherfucker! Chink!”
I keep walking and say nothing, though in my head I’m thinking “fucking meth head” and “redneck piece of shit.” The man on the bike keeps pace with me.
“Go back to where you came from!” “Motherfucker! Chink! Motherfucker! Chink!”
“Well, this is fucking stupid,” I say to no one but myself, turning off the street and breaking into a run. Without thinking it through, I grab a fist-sized rock off the ground and keep running, wondering if those long-ago years of wushu practice might finally come in handy. But the man soon disappears, the day rectified into silence. There is an empty baseball field in front of me, I notice, and a dead tree drawn and quartered by a chain link fence. I go to my car and just sit there for a few minutes, running the AC. I’m already berating myself for not dealing with the situation in a calmer or more confident way. Why had I immediately crossed the street instead of responding to the man’s greeting? Why had I been so quick to pathologize him, that “fucking meth head”? Why had fantasies of violence jumped so readily into my head?
I guess I’m more like Kim than I care to admit. Every time this scene repeats, I try to empathize with the opposition, to rationalize their actions as a neutral observer might, and in so doing, remove their barbs from my skin. I try and do this especially in the South, because in a deeply condescending way, I feel like I owe it to these sad people stuck in sad places, these Rocky Toppers plentiful in pride of place but scarce in everything else. And yet the bitterness in me is also very real, and very Southern. I may be fed up with myself for taking what amounts to schoolyard name-calling so seriously, but I’m even more fed up with them, these men and women who insist on begging the question in the most debasing of ways, these wrathful Southern revenants we honorary whites are supposed to handle with kid gloves or avoid. Why are we not extended, at bare minimum, the benefit of their avoidance? Why is it so hard, when they come calling, to stand where we are and just be?
I’ve been trying to leave the South for almost fourteen years now. Coming back is partly an obligation, a son visiting his aging parents. But truthfully, I feel out of sorts when I’ve been absent from the Valley for too long. My little sector of Appalachia is probably the one place on Earth where I can always tell when something has changed. There’s now a Kung Fu tea right next to Tennessee’s first highway, and a Pho 99 where a Stefano’s Pizza used to be. Near that pho place is Far East, a tiny Chinese grocer where I used to sit on a crackly leather armchair by the door as Mom picked out vegetables, sucking on a gratis Dum-dum. The kindly source of those Dum-dums is now dead (lung cancer, Mom confides), and so we do our shopping at a newer and better-stocked grocer called Sunrise. I always stop outside of Sunrise to read the latest notices pinned to the community message board. Today there are the usual advertisements for badminton lessons, citizenship lawyers, and language exchanges, plus a help wanted sign for Little Caesar’s with the tagline “JOIN THE EMPIRE” printed on it in all caps.
What’s also changed, to my sadness and surprise, is the field. Sometime in the last two years, the farmer sold the land and developers swooped in. The neighborhood will be called “Ivey Farms” when it’s finished. People will live there, and not just in their minds. They will lead lives not unlike the one that I led when I was growing up here, which is to say they will need their own outsides.
I must go and see it, obviously, the field before it’s no longer itself. It looks rather small with freshly paved roads circumnavigating its heart. Much of the ground cover has been stripped away to reveal the land’s livid, red insides, from which bulwarks of wood, soon to be houses, now rise. I think back to all the hours I spent here as a kid, how the field that wasn’t mine still conferred to me a sense of place. I learned my cardinal directions from sitting in that field and adopting its orientation. To the east were always the Smokies, to the west a woodland masking the interstate. My north was a new neighborhood, my south the neighborhood where I still dream. I don’t want to leave yet, but there’s not much left to see. I consider taking a few tufts of grass with me as a keepsake, but that would be morbid, I think, like shaving hairs off a corpse. As I cut back across the dividing line which separates my parents’ neighborhood from the field, I notice I’ve brought a bit of the field back with me, a few grams of Southern soil, pressed into my soles, that I leave behind me now as tracks.
To walk around with a vestigial geography in the mind, to feel shackled to a place whether you want to be or not: these are feelings an Asian Southerner gets from both sides.
Maybe the question is actually less complicated than I’ve made it out to be. You’re either from a place, or you aren’t; you’re Southern, or something else. I haven’t lived in the South since I turned eighteen. Ergo, I’m no longer Southern. What helps me undo this bind is the fact that so much of Southern identity is about missing a place from afar. This is a feeling many Asian Americans are also familiar with, even if the homes they pine for lie further east than Tennessee. To walk around with a vestigial geography in the mind, to feel shackled to a place whether you want to be or not: these are feelings an Asian Southerner gets from both sides.
This is also how I know that an Asian South does exist. I miss it. It’s as simple as that. All the glimmerings of that hybrid strata—the humidity, the cicadas, the scallions bunched up in the yard—and all the habits of mind and body these glimmerings sustain, they’re real. My father likes to talk about how he wanted to be an artist, too, when he was young—not a writer, but the kind of artist who sketches people in the park. He’s very glad he didn’t try to go through with that plan, the path of “crazy people,” he says. But now that he’s older, he’s gotten back into picture-making, using cameras instead of a pen. “I don’t think you could take a picture like this anywhere else,” he says of a heavily-edited image he’s just framed. The picture shows a forest in the Smokies from above, in autumn time, the foliage washed in ruby-red. Dad has affixed a stamp-style yinjian, or signature, to one corner, indicating that this Southern image is his. “Doesn’t it look just like a Chinese painting?”
As for my old dog, he coordinates his dying with the cicadas. By July, they’re all gone, and I’m reading a pamphlet from the pet crematorium warning me to avoid stewing in this “deafening silence.” Mom asks me what I think we should do with the ashes. I tell her we should scatter him in the field before its new tenants move in. When we try and take him out of the urn, though, the lid of the vessel is sealed. “Let’s just leave him on the porch then,” Mom says. He was sleeping there when he passed.
This selection may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Electric Literature is pleased to reveal the cover of Bind Me Tighter Stillby Lara Ehrlich, which will be published by Red Hen Press on September 09, 2025. You can pre-order your copy here.
The youngest of three siren sisters, Ceto is weary of an existence driven by hunger, no better than a fish. She trades her tail for life on land, marries the first man she meets, and bears a daughter, only to discover that domesticity is just as mundane as siren-hood. In search of something more, she flees with her daughter Naia to the ocean, where she establishes a mermaid burlesque and recreates herself, performing as a siren in a tank built into the limestone cliffs overlooking the sea. She trains more sirens, expanding Sirenland from a roadside attraction to a national sensation she rules without opposition—until Naia, at 15, begins to push back against the world Ceto has created and the role she performs in her mother’s shows. A death at Sirenland threatens Ceto’s authority and leads Naia to question whether this women-ruled kingdom is truly as empowering as her mother would have her believe. Bind Me Tighter Still explores power and hunger, sacrifice and motherhood, and celebrates the fierceness of female strength in a male-dominated world.
Here is the cover, photography by Renee Robyn.
Lara Ehrlich: “I took the book’s title from The Odyssey, in which Odysseus implores his men to “Bind me tighter, still” to the mast as their ship approaches the island of the sirens, so he can’t give in to their song. The book—and the cover—subverts the concept of a man needing to be bound to withstand a woman’s allure.
For me, what’s interesting about siren-hood is not the possession of a tail, but the seam where the tail meets human flesh. That’s where the tension lies, both in real sirens and in the sirens of Bind Me Tighter Still—women in Lycra tails performing before an audience. I’m reminded of a scene from Mad Men, where the powerful, sexy Joan—admired in part for her beautiful breasts—removes her bra to reveal the raw welts left by the straps on her shoulders.
I’m fascinated by how the suffocating tightness of the tail constricts flesh in the name of otherworldly beauty, reminiscent of corsets and push-up bras, and how these garments are worn both to invite the viewer’s gaze and, at the same time, to empower the wearer.
Renee Robyn’s photography, and this photograph in particular, convey a similar tension. The woman on the cover is bound, but not in the sense of being powerless. Her restraint is a choice, a performance of vulnerability that is entirely within her control. This inversion of power dynamics is at the heart of the story.”
Four thousand eight hundred for the preparation of the body + three thousand seven hundred ninety-five for the casket + nine hundred eighty for the grave liner + five hundred to open and close the earth + four hundred twenty-five for something called a vault service charge + twelve hundred for two plots including one for my father who was still alive + one hundred for prayer cards + three hundred forty-one dollars and twenty-five cents sales tax. Disclaimer: We do not warrant or claim that the vault you are purchasing is watertight. The stone cost four thousand four hundred eighty-four dollars + three hundred thirteen dollars and eighty-eight cents sales tax, bringing the total cost of my mother’s death to sixteen thousand nine hundred thirty-nine dollars and thirteen cents, not counting, of course, the cost of therapy and the cost of her empty slippers by the door and the cost of my father no longer able to sleep in the bed he’d shared with her and many other costs beyond dollars and sense. But the United States had calculated that my mother’s life, rather her death, was worth nine thousand dollars, thereby decreasing the actual cost to seven thousand nine hundred thirty-nine dollars and thirteen cents, that is, if my father uploaded to DisasterAssistance.gov the required paperwork: receipts for the aforementioned goods and services and a certificate of death that listed the causes. I helped my father by scanning the documents, making sure to include my mother’s disaster number, and then we waited. The expiration date was approaching, but my father had heard nothing. When he called, a robot said: You are very important to us. We’re experiencing a high volume of calls. Please stay on the line. Your wait time is approximately three hours forty-two minutes. My father waited two hours twelve minutes before the line went dead. This is their plan, my father said. They want you to give up, to miss the deadline. Well, I’m ready to hold forever. He called back, and fell asleep while holding, and hours later woke to a human voice, who told him that the death certificate was blurry: acute respiratory failure looked like a cute respite allure and coronavirus pneumonia looked like crown us new mania and the manner of death was natural but the boxes for accident, pending investigation, and could not be determined seemed to have some kind of mark beside them, and in order for them to process my father’s application, we would need to upload the death certificate with higher resolution, and we had failed to upload the back of the certificate. ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HAS A MULTI- COLORED BACKGROUND ON SPECIAL WHITE SECURITY PAPER AND THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA ON BACK THAT TURNS FROM ORANGE TO YELLOW WHEN RUBBED. ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HAS A HIDDEN VOID ON FRONT THAT APPEARS WHEN PHOTOGRAPHED. We tried again, and my father called to make sure it had been received and could be read, but a robot told him the wait was now seven hours seven minutes. The robot was very sorry about the increasing volume of calls. They want to bleed the clock, my father told me. They want you to assume everything’s okay only for you to find out a day late that it’s too late. Just before the dead- line, he got through to a human, not the same human he’d spoken with before, who confirmed that my mother’s death certificate was now clear, and three months later my father received a check for nine thousand dollars, which he used to buy an automatic generator. After my mother died, my father slept in an electric chair that reclined to elevate his diabetic legs and stood him up in the morning. He was afraid of getting stuck. One night, a storm knocked out the power. The generator kicked in and the house came back to life: the lights on the Christmas tree blinked, and voices from the TV, which my father kept on twenty-four hours a day, filled the room’s silence. I need to have it on, my father told me, but only sports and sitcoms. No news, no drama, nothing heavy. ORIGINAL POEM HAS A WHITE BACKGROUND ON RECYCLED PAPER AND THE GREAT SEAL OF THE MISTAKE OF 2020-2023 ON BACK THAT TURNS RED WHEN RUBBED. ORIGINAL HAS A HIDDEN VOID BETWEEN EVERY LINE AND BETWEEN EVERY WORD. TO SEE THE VOID WILL COST YOU SIXTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE DOLLARS AND THIRTEEN CENTS TIMES ONE POINT TWO MILLION.
Quiet Quit
Didn’t bother to set an alarm or make the bed. Coffee grew cold in my cup
while toast burned. Fruit flies swarmed a bowl of bananas turned black.
Dozed on the toilet, book on my lap. Forgot to brush my teeth, forgot the wash a week,
had to soak the reek from toe-holed socks. Forgot my mother’s phone number.
Didn’t bother to tie my laces, fell on my face, chipped two teeth. Let the car run out of gas.
Let the inspection expire. Let the milk expire, ate cereal dry. A nap turned into a two-day sleep.
Then the first buds broke. Catkins of alder trees, cuckoo and bluebell bloom.
Crowned my teeth, darned my socks. Pulled weeds, mulched the base of the alder,
didn’t bother to wash from my hands the smell of wood chips, pine straw, moss. My mother
is buried far away, so I use Google Earth to visit her grave, and the house where she lived,
and the hospital parking lot where I slept in my car and woke to sirens and snow.
I’m trying to make my bed and brush my teeth. I’m trying to remember her voice
before her lungs quit. Song sparrows fly twigs to the flowerbed outside my window.
This morning in overgrown grass under light rain, a butterfly alighted on my face.
Could desire be a form of demonic possession? A superstitious question, I know, but one I’ve seriously considered. Because when I recall the last time I experienced desire for another, nothing seemed impossible. All the positions, the acts that had previously felt out of bounds, that I’d recoiled from, not only stoked my curiosity but also appeared to fall entirely within the realm of possibility. Perfect sense, I concluded. Common sense. My desires, of which I wanted to be a full and willing participant, made up a long list: Anal. Choking. Fisting. Slapping. Edging. Rimming. Being watched, as I touch myself. Being bound. Fellatio in a public place. Period sex, when flow is heaviest. Teabagging in cold morning air, my nose running, birdsong cheering me on. Cunnilingus and fingering from under the table, while dinner turns cold and I get warm.
Maybe that’s why Ellen Hutter’s initial prayer at the beginning of Robert Eggers’ 2024 remake of Nosferatu felt so familiar to me. The sounds she utters afterwards, as she lies dressed in a thin nightgown on bare ground, are even more recognizable. I have uttered an approximation of that prayer, and those moans, varying only in pitch and intensity, have escaped my body.
Thisis a horror movie, but to my surprise, I left the theater feeling aroused. There must be something wrong with me, I thought. After all, isn’t Nosferatu about toxic relationships? Didn’t I just finish watching scene upon scene of gratuitous bloodshed, of murder, of human suffering, of evil triumphing over good? Yet it also struck me as empowering, and one of the most feminist films I’d seen in a while. In Eggers’ hands, the story becomes something more: it’s a monster movie, yes, but it’s also a film about what a woman is willing to sacrifice to sate her appetite—not the vampire’s appetite, but her own.
Ellen’s character is typically remembered more for her final sacrifice than her desire. And no wonder. After the vampire wreaks havoc on the town of Wisborg, Ellen and Professor von Franz come to agree, in secret, that the only way for Count Orlok to be vanquished is through Ellen herself. She must offer her body—and willingly—to satisfy and destroy an otherwise invincible demon. It’s a familiar motif, and also a rather antiquated and yawn-worthy one: the notion of offering up a sacrifice, especially a woman, to save the world, because it’s assumed a woman will always act for the greater good; because a woman will put the needs of others before her own; because by virtue of being a woman, she must atone for the notion of original sin, and feel pity for the suffering of strangers she has no especial reason to care for. Boring, to say nothing of unrealistic.
This is the story of a woman who will stop at nothing to satisfy her desire.
It’s all a bit too comfortable, too convenient, and it’s a testament to Eggers’ filmmaking power that the notion of female self-sacrifice as a heroic gesture comes across as utterly anticlimactic. It’s like a page ripped out of a fable, a fairy tale. In Eggers’ Nosferatu, the sacrifice isn’t the point. This is the story of a woman who will stop at nothing to satisfy her desire. While it’s no surprise that Lily-Rose Depp’s Ellen Hutter exhibits and wields significantly more agency than her 1922 counterpart, what does feel refreshing is that it’s not simply the agency requisite to stepping into the role of a voluntary sacrifice. It’s agency to seek out and plumb the depths of desire, and, most vital, to sacrifice anything and anyone that stands in the way of that desire—be it a marriage, friends, or an entire town.
Like any epic adventure story that has its twists and turns, that has its pitfalls and victims, Nosferatu is about the journey to great, mind-blowing sex, the kind of sex that isn’t typically requisite to marriage and—surely, one of life’s ugly truths—is more probably found outside of it (see also: Halina Reijn’s recent movie Babygirl). This is a film about feeding female desire, and being bold and brazen enough to want satisfaction so badly that everything and everyone must, by necessity, fall to the wayside. Ellen’s desire is so strong that it causes shipwreck, brings plague, kills her beloved friend, Anna, and drives people to madness, even prompting the hard-ass, stick-in-the-mud Friedrich to commit abominations, such as necrophilia on his wife’s corpse. It also weakens and nearly destroys Ellen’s husband, Thomas.
While I’ve no doubt that Ellen loves Thomas and Thomas loves Ellen (cue the violins), in Nosferatu, love does not conquer all. Love is tested, weighed against female desire, and comes out on the losing side. When Thomas fearfully warns Ellen that he knows Orlok is coming for her, she taunts her husband, emasculating him. Though she kneels at his feet, the power and the authority in this scene lie wholly with her. She tells Thomas that he couldn’t satisfy her like the other he could, and I believe her. She’s not haunted. She was never haunted. Well before Ellen Hutter prayed to her “guardian angel,” the monster already existed within her. Herr Knock describes her, early in the film, as sylph-like in her beauty, and it becomes something of a running theme to conclude that Ellen is someone exceptional, a woman not of this world, “not of humankind.” I would disagree, with vehemence. There are varying degrees of Ellen Hutter in all of us. Rather, it is Anna, doll-like, pious, compliant and submissive, who strikes me as being not so much “of humankind” but manufactured from mankind.
Well before Ellen Hutter prayed to her ‘guardian angel,’ the monster already existed within her.
At one point, Count Orlok says, perhaps a bit too modestly, “I am an appetite, nothing more.” But he isn’t just an appetite; he is Ellen’s appetite. And by extension, he is the manifestation of the appetite of any red-blooded woman, whether living in the nineteenth-century or now. This appetite is wonderfully, triumphantly dominant in its monstrosity, in its need and hunger, and in its inexhaustible ruthlessness. It is something to be reveled in, and it isn’t to be ignored, much less dreaded. Female desire is a force that has cowed many a man, made him shrink and shrivel, and brought him face-to-face with his most personal failings, his ineptitude. I have only to think of Thomas Hutter’s attempt at robust sex after Ellen provokes him to the point of anger. Oh, dear Thomas. All that futile, earnest thrusting. It is always an event, like watching a dog chase its own tail, to see an otherwise mild-mannered man erupt, but that scene only more deeply impressed in my mind that, in matters of desire, the logic may hold that something is perhaps better than nothing. Yet it will never replace what truly makes your blood run and your body burn.
I don’t believe it’s Ellen’s supposed “covenant” with Orlok via a prayer that incites the vampire’s wrath when she marries Thomas. That’s the fairy tale and fable element at work again. No, I thought to myself, that’s only a front. And the story, if viewed through an altered lens, becomes an unexpectedly modern one. Thomas may be kind and caring and tender. He is every bit the conventional Prince Charming, a true hero. But he doesn’t fully satisfy his wife, so—what is a girl to do?—she must summon desire from another source. What fairy tales, even the dark ones, don’t go into is that the story doesn’t end with a kiss and a ring and the promise of forever. That’s merely the beginning. The bed is its own threshold, the equivalent of Orlok’s fortress, and the shadow it casts is long. Just as the proverbial dragon needs to be slayed and misunderstandings between lovers unknotted for a couple to unite, female desire also has to be fed—over and over. For me, that is what Nosferatu is really about: what a woman is willing to sacrifice to finally have the chance to achieve a stunning, glorious, life-draining “big O.”
And what Ellen is willing to sacrifice is significant. One of the most memorable losses depicted in the film is the killing of Anna’s daughters. I’m going to veer into the taboo, the verboten, the unthinkable, and say I am convinced it’s both important and necessary that Eggers shows the difficult scene of Orlok holding one of Anna’s children like a ragdoll and draining her blood before casting her corpse away. I’m grateful for that scene because, when I watched it, I felt something unfurl in my chest: that burden of having to care, or of feeling that, because I identify as a woman, I should, by instinct, show concern about things like the welfare of children and other small creatures, that I should feel pity when I see roadkill on the highway or be moved when tragedy befalls the innocent. Ellen knew Orlok’s uncompromising nature; she always knew. I would offer that a portion of the real agency in the film is that she knew, and she let it all happen anyway. These horrors could have been stopped much sooner, but they weren’t.
To this day, motherhood is considered one of the most sacred and foundational pillars of being a woman, propped up and defended as an ideal. But the death of Anna’s children sacrifices that sanctity for female sexual fulfillment. The power of motherhood is thrown, repulsively, almost casually, like a piece of unwanted flesh from the deli counter, right in our faces. Contrast this with the final scene, which depicts Ellen’s deathbed. The sheets are saturated with blood, and instantly, I thought: childbirth. But this isn’t childbirth. This is consummation at its finest. And how quiet and serene the conclusion—even sublime. How masterful and resplendent. How fantastically empowering. Children gone. Annoying, sanctimonious couple dead. Husband sent on a fool’s errand and cuckolded. I’ll speak only for myself when I say I will take the orgasm over the baby any day.
It has always nagged me when I hear of desire being described as dark, as if there were such a thing as the Splenda version of desire or Desire Lite. Of course desire is dark. Of course desire is hard to face, because to confront desire inevitably means pressing one’s nose against the glass and boring one’s eyes as far into the reaches of human nature as one can endure. The whole point of desire is that it is meant to push one’s limits, to test and probe one’s boundaries, not just sexually but in other ways: mentally, emotionally. There was nothing delicate or beautiful about what I felt for the man who awakened my desire, which was so powerful that my body couldn’t contain it. One night on my own, my blood humming beneath my skin, I took a paper-cutting knife, pushed up the blade, and drew a short, straight line down my thigh. When the skin wouldn’t break, I sliced again, then again, until the wound turned liquid and shone in the dark. I touched the blood, tasted it, and my knees shook. It doesn’t seem a coincidence that I came hardest thinking of the man, who treated me the worst, and he didn’t even need to be there when his name, monosyllabic, interchangeable in those fleeting, precious moments with other words, with God, with Fuck, flew out of my throat like a scream. By that point, I had lost count of the number of times I had apologized to him during our meetings. I’m sorry. I’m sorry. I’m sorry. Both in-person and in writing. Variations of: I’m sorry. I’ve done wrong. I’ve made another mistake. I know I’ve disappointed you. I will do better. You’re always right. I remember hanging my head, lowering my voice, and putting my guilty face on. “I apologize,” I said, deliberately adding a small tremor, so he would believe me. I arranged my expression, as the spit gathered in a small swell on my tongue and my knuckles turned white on the wooden chair to hold myself back.
Desire is as complex as it can be dangerous.
My point here is not to support toxic relationships that are often and frequently abusive. It’s that desire is as complex as it can be dangerous.To this end, if I were to take a lesson from Nosferatu, I would argue that self-sacrifice does not mean so much giving up as giving in, of learning more about yourself and of understanding every facet of your body and its needs, especially as a woman. I know too well the little smile Ellen gives Orlok in the moments the sun rises, and he is about to disintegrate. My own body trembling with the aftershock of a climax, warm sweat fast cooling, and the tide of exhaustion lulling me to a dreamless sleep, that is a smile of victory, of saying but not saying, “I’ve won this round. 15 – love.”
No wonder I found the final scene of Nosferatu so invigorating, because I’d like to think that in real life, the equivalent of Ellen Hutter would get out of bed again, dress herself, and go about her business, perhaps make a cup of joe before proceeding to her hot yoga session. Let him do the laundry. Let him replace the sheets—or not, because in less than twelve hours, she’ll return, and they will only get dirty again.
“You’re losing yourself to him,” a friend said to me, seeing that I was changing because I was in the throes of desire for another. “You don’t realize it, but you’re losing yourself. Do you love him more, or do you love yourself more?” I paused and considered. It was true that for some time I had felt drained and tired. With every apology, every supposed misstep, it was as if a sketch of my identity were being slowly erased. Then I said, “I’m not losing myself. I’m finding myself.” Already I understood that the contours of something new was taking shape. I was re-drawing the borders; I was stitching out a fresh sovereignty and sky and marking out what could and could not enter that truly sacred space: the self. I was shuddering through the membrane of my old skin and molting what was no longer useful, while keeping close the priceless life lessons I’d earned. Before ending the call, I added with a brusqueness that startled me, “Oh, and I will always love myself more. Always.”
Terrifying, isn’t it? And so fitting for the horror genre: a woman placing her desire above all else. Above morality. Above wifehood and motherhood. Above even the individual she loves. Months have passed, and my version of Count Orlok is, like the monster cracking apart in the sun, long gone. But the knee-shaking, body-contorting orgasms happily remain. When I scan my bookshelves, I take in what my Orlok has left me. All those valuable tomes, and how I have sunk my teeth into their pages to suck, well, like a vampire, their pulp and their substance. I look at my reflection in the mirror, and I see a different, stronger version of my body. More lean muscle. Cheeks flushed from intense exercise. Forehead and nose dripping sweat. Pleasure, knowledge, health and vitality—all in all, not too bad a result. Which begs this question: I wonder who, in the end, is the real monster in Nosferatu, and what the term “monster” even means within the context of this film. What you see, after all, isn’t always the truth. Who has really been feeding off of whom the whole time? Think, then think again.
Zahid Rafiq’s debut collection The World With Its Mouth Open carries a quiet sense of haunting. Eleven stories bring forth eleven lives, changed by an encounter—with a stranger, personal grief, financial circumstances or the conflict that stains the quotidian conditions in Kashmir.
In the opening story, Nusrat, a pregnant woman, encounters a childhood friend’s older brother, Rajaji, on her way back from the doctor’s appointment and finds herself grieving the girl she used to be. In “The House,” a workman discovers bones as he digs the earth to build the foundation of a new house. He worries about other secrets the earth holds, insisting to dig deeper, and bringing up questions of how to dispose of the remains correctly but the owners have other plans, adamant on making the remnants disappear without the word getting out. In “The Man with the Suitcase,” Salim, a young man on the hunt for a new job is going door to door at local businesses when he catches a glimpse of a stranger with a suitcase. An unknown curiosity makes Salim abandon his employment search and with it, skirting the responsibilities of being the breadwinner and the grief of having lost his older brother, as he goes on a seemingly wild goose chase. Rafiq offers chilling, striking details that expose his characters’ inner turmoil amid the chaos and violence that permeates their land and lives.
In conversation, on a Saturday morning, Zahid tells me he is a reluctant writer—always avoiding getting to the page but pushed to contend with fear and the uncertainty of life when the words arrive. We spoke about restraint in language, vague endings, the uncertainty of our lives, and more.
Bareerah Ghani: I want to begin with the opening story where we meet this pregnant woman who is grieving her previous miscarriages, thinking about how at the time of losing the baby, she’d begun noticing other childless women. It got me thinking about how sometimes loss and grief, instead of making us more isolated, can make us more attuned to the world around us. I would love your thoughts on how grief affects our worldview.
Zahid Rafiq: I think it is different for different people.Some people, I guess, could become bitter.Some people sharpen. Some people become more aware and receptive of the grief of others.Some probably drown in their grief in a way that they no longer are aware of other people’s grief. I wouldn’t like to generalize. As a writer, I am interested in trying to see who these characters are. How do they respond to grief? What does it make of them? How do they relate to themselves and to one another?
BG: In many of your stories, grief is such a prominent thing, and I wonder if you perceive it as one of those emotions that can consume you, that can quite easily become your identity.
ZR: In cultures where there has been a lot of violence, where there is oppression, injustice, grief, sorrow, kind of, become the sea we swim in. It becomes almost like this nature of ours. We go about life, but grief is this ever-present thing – grief, sorrow, melancholy, the bitter aftertaste of things! And in the place these stories are set in, there is a persistence of grief.
BG: And it shows up in your prose, too, in the way there is restraint. Was that intentional?
ZR: To some degree. I would say it was a restraint I wanted to have in life, and it was a restraint I wanted to have in the prose as well. It was partly conscious, or rather, I became conscious of this while working on it, that I’m trying to hold myself back. I realized during the writing that I was reluctant to take certain paths; I think that the reluctance and the restraint are somehow related.
BG: Your stories have this underlying sense of unease and unrest. They often end in very vague ways, and you leave the reader with a lot to figure out on their own, which I love! I’m curious about how you think of endings in life and in fiction?
ZR: In a way, there are no endings. It keeps going on – something comes to an end, and another thing sprouts out of it. But of course there are, at the same time, endings to stories, to relationships, to everything but they are never very clean endings. Like revolutions end, dictatorships end, countries are born, occupations end, but it always merges into something else. There is this constant metamorphosis that keeps happening, so endings are not very clean to me, not clear to me. And the way I write, sometimes I don’t have the endings. But what I want to do is not write a false sentence. I would rather have it end in a manner that isn’t clean. But at least it is true to itself. The sentence is true to itself, and to the story.
And then, some of these endings are also vague because the world I write about is vague and I don’t quite see it all. I’m trying to make sense of it, just as a reader would when reading the book. And in a lot of places, I am aware of the narrowness of my own vision, of how I couldn’t see beyond something, but that was my limitation as I was writing this book. That was where I was.
BG: I understand what you’re saying about this world that your characters inhabit, which is so uncertain, and I couldn’t help but notice that in so many of your stories we have this presence of a stranger, who your characters encounter, and it changes their day or their life in some way. For example, in “The Man with the Suitcase,” the engine of the story is really just, Salim being curious about this stranger he sees on the street and it leads him to confront his grief, and this suggests to me that our lives are a chain reaction to one another and the world around us. Do you believe life in its essence is uncertain and unstable, and we, in our search of material markers of achievement, create a false sense of certainty?
ZR: It’s extremely uncertain. We cover it up with things, with marriages, relationships, decency, morals, ethics, religion, all of it. But you peel off a layer, and it’s scary, the sheer uncertainty that one might not exist tomorrow morning. In certain places, though, one does not have to confront that fact so much, because the layer that covers this uncertainty is smoother, thicker, unblemished. But if you inhabit places which are, in some sense, saturated in violence, then it becomes very clear how fragile one’s existence is, and how fragile everything is. I’m interested in removing the top layer and seeing how does one live when we know that we can die in the evening.
BG: Did you start writing fiction to contend with this uncertainty?
ZR: I don’t know. That’s a hard question, because I wanted to write fiction for a long, long time. It is some kind of a necessity, that I’m aware of. This is in a way my central meaning.
BG: What is the one lesson you’ve acquired from your years of journalism, and applied in your approach to fiction?
ZR: I think some of the restraint that you spoke about earlier comes from there. One of the necessities of doing that job was not to indulge one’s feelings too much, to go out and report. It’s like, you go to these places where terrible things have happened, and you can’t be the first one to cry. And so that forces on you a certain kind of restraint. You must do your work, you must not weep. That job also introduced me to a lot of people, had me see the various layers of the world in which these stories are set, the world from which I write.
BG: I want to talk about the title. It’s beautiful, haunting, and very apt for the stories we get. There’s this undercurrent of paranoia about the world coming to get you. Your characters are constantly battling expectations and anxious thoughts about what others think and how they perceive them. And there’s always that underlying threat that something bad is going to happen, and it makes sense given where they live. I am curious about where you see the line between this being a cynical worldview or a reality, particularly for those living under occupation.
ZR: I would be curious to see how it speaks to someone who lives in a different set of circumstances. I write out of this mass of feeling, of uncertainty, precariousness, fear of confronting these moments when one is asked to show courage, and sometimes one has it, and sometimes one doesn’t. Before writing these stories, I didn’t know them. To be able to expound on them, to be able to say, what does it mean? I don’t know. I don’t think I have the necessary tools to, or even the vision to say much more. And I hope that if there is more to say, it will take another form of another story, because that’s how I want to think. That’s how I like to think – to articulate myself through characters, through brief moments, sentences.
The title came after the book was done. I didn’t want to take a title from one of the stories. It does in some way capture something of this book, that there is something that can swallow these people. They live around a vortex. Sometimes it’s the vortex of doubt. Sometimes it’s the suspicion, not being able to trust another person.
BG: I was particularly taken by the ending for “Dogs,” where the old dog says to the younger one, “Do you think everyone dies the same way? You don’t still think it is those wretched hiccups and the closing of eyes… if only dying were so easy.” It reminded me of Palestinian poet Mosab Abu Toha’s verses, “If you live in Gaza, you die several times.” I’m curious about your interpretation of death and dying, and your thoughts particularly on the dialogue?
ZR: I didn’t really decide on that dialogue. For a lot of these dialogues that the characters in the book say, I would like to believe that it’s their dialogue. I didn’t plan that this character will say this.
Characters said their own things, in some way. So when the old dog says what it did, I was like, Okay, what do you mean, old dog? You want to say anything more about it? But the old dog didn’t say anything more about it. And that’s the truth. And for a while I felt the story was incomplete. And had a few endings in mind but all of them seemed like me trying to make sense of the old dog and the situation and the story, and I was like, I don’t want to do that. That’s where it kind of ended for me.
I’m often not convinced by my own endings to be honest, but I think they’re true. I would like some endings in the traditional sense, endings that tie everything together. Till that happens I guess I am stuck with incomplete, unsatisfying, truths.
BG: I understand where you’re coming from. It does feel organic in your writing as well. It’s one of the things I really liked about this book. The fact that we end kind of mid event.
ZR: And these people, these characters, these dogs – they’re going to continue their life. They’re going to continue with their day. And we just have a sense of these characters. That’s how it is for me.
BG: What is next for you in terms of writing fiction?
ZR: I think another story, probably a novel. I’m hoping a novel. I’m trying to write it but it is this distant cloud of dust that has in it shapes, faces, that has a mood, and I’m trying to get a feel of it, not in the way that I understand it, but in the way that I can speak it and go farther, go closer.
The boy murmured, “Good night,” in a shy breathy singsong. “Good night what?”
“Good night, Grandpa.” Corrected, the boy looked miserable, mounting the stairs slowly, as though slightly lame, while I watched his small scuffing feet in sympathy, helpless to ease his awkwardness.
I was surprised a moment later when Jack said, “We need to talk, Dad,” sounding severe in his demand, because I was thinking of the boy.
“Lovely kid,” I said.
“He’s got a lot on his mind.”
“I was eleven once.” I wanted to say more when Jack interrupted. “He doesn’t need to be told he’s grown a lot since you last saw him.”
“It was meant as a compliment. And that was not exactly what I said.” I was about to say I hate to be misquoted, when Jack spoke again.
“You make these disownable assertions and you always avoid the point.”
I knew I was being scolded, yet I couldn’t help admiring Jack’s precision, especially that neat smack with the back of his hand, disownable.
“He has no control over his height,” Jack was saying. “It’s not a compliment. He’s the smallest boy in his class, and in case you’re interested he’s having a tough time at his new school.”
“I could sense that,” I said, beginning to rise from my chair, gripping the arms, thinking how, in old age, just getting up from a damn chair required a plan in advance for a sequence of moves.
“I’m not through, Dad.”
Feeling scolded again, I sat heavily in protest and held my knees, noticing in my resentful scrutiny that my son’s hair was going gray just above his ears, and that seemed to add to his air of severity.
“It’s your absurd church story.”
I said nothing but found more to criticize in my son’s appearance—the uncombed hair, the sweater pulled out of shape, his expensive but unpolished shoes. Surely such negligence was unacceptable in (as Jack once described himself) a customer care coordinator, who needed to be a convincing authority figure and communicator. Or was he scruffy because his wife was away?
“Absurd how?”
“That you went to church with your old granny as a five-year-old. The long walk through the woods—miles apparently. And then you came to the river . . .”
“I know the story,” I said. “Why are you rehashing it?”
“To emphasize how preposterous it is,” Jack said. “How, at the river your old granny . . .”
“Please.” I raised my hand and wagged my finger like a wiper blade before him, but he persisted.
“. . . put you on her shoulder and waded across the river, until the water brimmed chest high.”
Now I smiled, seeing it clearly—the old granny, the brown river, the small boy braced on her shoulder borne forth in the swift current to the far bank of tall reeds, the church steeple in the distance, like a pepper mill upright in torn clouds, the boy bright-eyed in the purple dawn, clinging to the white frizz on the old woman’s head.
“I was trying to inspire him. It’s about piety. Filial piety and spiritual piety.”
“But it never happened,” Jack said coldly.
“It most certainly happened.” Then I smiled again. “Just not to me.”
“He’s not one of your readers, Dad. He’s a small boy. He’s struggling at school. And he’s impressionable.”
I said, “I never scolded you as you are doing to me now.” I expected Jack to admit this, but instead he shook his head peevishly, looking more aged and careworn, while I sat and twinkled, as though defying him to reply.
“Maybe I never gave you cause to scold me.” Jack had been standing all this time, and now he folded his arms and looked down at me, seated, still defiantly twinkling. “One more thing, Dad. Imagine how much richer your life would be if you listened.”
“I have spent my whole life listening.” And I folded my arms, in mimicry of my son, as though to signal I was about to change the subject. “Some grandparents sell their house and relocate. So that they can be near their grandchildren.”
I saw the eager, futile, clumsy oldies, hovering, babysitting, twitching at the margins of the marriage, cheering the grandchildren’s sports events, reading to them, taking them for ice cream, panting and stumbling to keep up with them, foolishly looking for praise.
“At least I’ve spared you that.”
“Oh, yes, I just remembered. ‘I loathe great acting.’ ‘I hate vacations.’ ‘Politics is choosing the tallest dwarf.’”
I had reddened as my son spoke, mimicking my voice. I said, “He told you, did he?”
“Look, I’m glad you’re here, Dad, even if it’s only a week. Obviously Ben looks up to you. He found you on the internet. He says he wants to read your books.”
“I told him not to. That would spoil things,” I said. Softening my tone, I said, “Does this mean I can’t take him to school anymore?”
“No. I need you to. Laura won’t be back for days. I have to go to work. You came at a good time. Just”—he raised his hand and lowered it like a hatchet to mean Enough. No more.
“I thought we had an understanding,” I said the next day as we walked to school, the boy’s short legs scissoring beside my loping legs. I remembered what Jack had said about Ben being the smallest boy in the class. But he was a beautiful boy, his hair silken, gray-blue eyes, long lashes, pale cheeks; his thin legs, his trousers stylishly tight. Yet even with his quickened stride he could not keep up with me.
Feeling the necessity to explain, but hating having to, I said, “My story about going to church, being carried across the river on my granny’s shoulder—that was supposed to be our secret.”
“Dad asked,” the boy said, his voice hoarse with reluctance.
“Asked what?”
“If you were telling me stories.”
“You could have said, ‘I don’t know.’”
“That wouldn’t be true.”
I saw that the boy was scrupulously honest—how awkward and inconvenient: he will never understand the irony and impressionism in my fiction.
“Right. So if I asked you, ‘Do they talk about me?’ would you tell me?”
“I guess so.”
“What do they say?”
The child’s face tightened, his eyes narrowing, as though looking at something in the distance. He’s trying to remember, I thought at first. But something in the boy’s posture, seeming to duck, making himself small, told me the boy was trying to forget.
“‘He goes on and on about his new book.’” In that believable sentence the boy lapsed into a new voice, which I took to be not Jack’s but Laura’s.
“Heigh-ho,” I said, with a wave of my hand, as though undoing a curse. Then, softly, “Maybe I shouldn’t tell you any more stories.”
The boy was silent but his face contorted for a second with a noticeable twitch, as though an insect had hit his cheek.
“Unless you want me to.”
From the way Ben slowed and trudged I could tell he was pondering this, thinking hard, each footstep like a sudden shifting thought, and I remembered, He’s got a lot on his mind, so I didn’t press him.
At the school gate, he said, “Are you coming to the soccer game this afternoon?” and added, “You don’t have to if you don’t want to.”
“I wouldn’t miss it for anything.”
“Dad never comes—he’s always working.”
‘He’s a customer care coordinator,’ I said, trying not to sound satirical.
“He’s a customer care coordinator,” I said, trying not to sound satirical. But the boy hadn’t heard. He’d sprinted into the schoolyard, in the direction of a dark girl in a blue beret, bigger than he, who smiled when she saw him.
I spent the rest of the day recopying a story I’d written in longhand, thinking, I must remember to tell the boy this. My method was to write a draft in ballpoint, but instead of correcting it line by line I set the pages before me and copied them, correcting as I went, and always the story was enlarged, the dialogue crisper, the descriptions denser. But the light was bad, the chair was wrong, I missed my own desk, and at last I left the house, walking by a longer route to the delicatessen, disliking the idea that I was killing time, and hating the useless hours afterward on a park bench, looking like a futile old man, waiting for the school day to end.
The game had started by the time I got to it. I watched with the mothers, surprised by their youth, admiring how lovely they looked in their enthusiasm. I caught Ben’s eye and waved to him, but I lost interest in the game and turned to the people in the stands, the mothers near me, the students sitting apart—girls and boys together, all races, confident, casually dressed, and I saw among the other spectators the dark girl in the blue beret, her chin in her hands, and now I saw her eager eyes, her pretty lips, her face brightened by her glee watching the game. She stood out from all the others, but she was too young to know how lovely she was, and that her life would be both blessed and cursed by her beauty.
Then, distracted, I grew sad seeing a boy in a necktie and long-sleeved shirt, with spiky hair, sitting apart from the others—the boy I had been, even to the chewed tie; tense, unathletic, puny, hoping not to be noticed. I spent the rest of the game glancing at the dark girl, grieving for the geeky loner.
“When I was eleven,” I said on the walk home, “that was a big year. I fell in love.”
I saw Ben look away, and he began to walk faster.
“She was the new girl in the class, from Holland, amazingly enough. ‘Our Dutch girl’ the teacher called her. She was a bit bigger than me and she had a beautiful face. Marta van de Velde. It was my first experience of love.”
I looked at the boy for a reaction. Still silent, Ben shifted his gym bag from one shoulder to the other. He said, “Did you see my header? Did you see us score that goal at the end?”
“Of course—that was outstanding.”
But I hadn’t seen. I had been thinking of Marta van der Velde, her smooth face and blue eyes, her small prim lips, the way she sat, her twitching lashes when she looked down, her hands clasped on the desktop. What was it that attracted me? Her beauty, certainly, but something else—a suggestion of humor in her watchfulness, and a gentle manner. And her flesh. She was someone I wanted to touch, someone I wished to hold. That was it—to hold her, and be held. I was, at that age, innocent of anything more.
She sat across the aisle, the new girl Marta, in her white blouse with the lace collar and the bunchy skirt and black buckled shoes. And I stared, twisting my chewed tie in my bitten fingers and wishing to hold her—somehow, to lie next to her, as I imagined later, my eyes shut tight, before I went to sleep.
“Why did you like her?”
“Good question!” I said, “It was her smile, her smooth cheeks, her eyes, her pretty fingers. She was sweet. She wasn’t a tease.”
“Is that all?”
“She didn’t look like any of the other girls. And she was nicer than me.”
“In what way?”
“I love these questions, Ben. She was happier. She was better in most ways. She had unusual handwriting—upright and strong. I liked seeing her holding the thick pen in her delicate fingers.”
“There’s a girl in my class, Brady—she’s like that.”
I had been thinking of Marta. I said, “I didn’t know what to say to her.”
“Brady smiles a lot, but she never talks to me. She’s bigger than me. She plays volleyball.” Seeing that I was not responding, he narrowed his eyes and went silent.
But the boy’s silence provoked me, and in some small corner of my brain I recaptured the boy’s words as a whispered echo, the name of the girl.
“Her first name is Brady?”
The boy nodded and said, “But she has her own friends.”
“All I wanted to do was look at her, stare endlessly at her, as you would a work of art. What would you say to a work of art? You’d just stand there like a goofball and admire it and feel small, lost in your fascination.”
Ben said, “We’ve got another game on Friday,” and quickly, “You don’t have to go if you don’t want to.”
“I’ll be there,” I said. “Maybe Brady will be there.”
The boy shrugged, hunching his shoulders, looking smaller.
“I followed her home,” I said.
The boy was trudging again, each slapping footfall like an arrested thought. “I loved her,” I said. “I didn’t know what to do.” The memory possessed me, induced a reverie, and in my concentration I forgot where I was until I got to the walkway of my son’s house. I said, “This is between us.”
“What is?”
“What I just told you.”
“I didn’t understand what you were saying.”
I patted the boy’s smooth cheek, my hand lingering on its warmth.
I counted on seeing Ben: by concentrating on him I understood myself at that age. I had not realized how small I’d been at eleven, and—though I’d also played on the soccer team and competed with the rest of the boys in the gym in phys ed—how puny.
So I grieved for my younger self, but I knew that boy better—the boy I’d been—and I marveled that I’d been so bold as to declare my love for Marta van der Velde. I remembered it: the small brown paper bag of fresh fudge, and the note inside, I love you. I’d covertly raised the lid on her desk before school and left it inside, next to her fat pen, and her pencils and ruler.
Had she known it was from me? I hoped so.
“Do you want to impress Brady?” I asked Ben after school the day before the game. “By playing well? Maybe scoring a goal?”
“I’m a wing,” Ben said. “I pass the ball to the striker.”
“But are you happy to see Brady in the stands?”
“I don’t think about it.”
I nodded—it was just what I would have said, and I was glad once again to be reminded of the habitual evasions of my younger self.
“Of course not, why should you? You’ve got other things to think about,” I said. “Tell me about your English teacher.”
“Mr. Bowlus. He has hairy ears.”
I laughed out loud and began to cough and staggered a little. “Are you all right, Grandpa?”
Too moved to answer, I hugged the boy and then realized that he was trying to twist free.
I was at first puzzled by the smell of bacon the next morning, the clank of a kettle, the bubbling of eggs frying in fat—odors and sounds from the kitchen that seemed intrusive because I was unused to them. Laura, busy at the stove, kept her back turned when I greeted her, saying I was glad to see her. But I was dismayed, because her showing up meant an interruption of my routine with Ben.
Laura said, “Hi!” calling out to me over her shoulder, while shoveling in the skillet with her spatula and whacking it once.
Seeing Jack opening his car door, I hurried to the driveway and said, “I had no idea Laura was coming back so soon.”
“She lives here, Dad. She’s my wife.”
“Maybe I should go.”
I wanted him to protest: No, stay. It’s great having you here.
But he said, “It’s up to you.”
That left me without a reply, and after Jack had gone to work, hearing Laura in the kitchen, talking on the phone as she chopped—What? Onions, carrots—on the butcher block, holding the phone in the crook of her shoulder and ear as she worked, slashing (it seemed to me) harder than necessary, I felt excluded, and superfluous, the chopping sounds like a severe warning.
I had apologized to them for this visit as an interruption, yet I knew they did not allow themselves to be interrupted. They were in motion when I arrived, and they stayed in motion. They did not break their stride. They worked, they went out. We’re seeing friends—wasn’t I a friend?—You have a chance to bond with Ben.
I’d saved them the cost of a babysitter, yet being with Ben was what I wanted. And there was the game.
Searching the stands for the girl I’d seen smiling at Ben that first day in the schoolyard, and at the previous game, I spotted her easily, the blue beret, the cheeks the shade of milky coffee, and bright eyes, the glint of green, dark eyebrows, full lips—a beauty. Her loose tracksuit bulked on her but her hands and wrists were slender. She was smallish, the size of Marta van der Velde—but bigger than Ben; not a woman yet but a girl, unformed, a luminous child, concentrating on the game that had just begun.
She was smallish, the size of Marta van der Velde—but bigger than Ben; not a woman yet but a girl, unformed, a luminous child, concentrating on the game that had just begun.
I followed the game through Brady’s gestures and expressions, the way she clapped when the ball was kicked, her hands over her face, peering through her parted fingers at tense moments, clawing at her beret at the sound of a whistle. She sat with other girls but she seemed oblivious of them, until one of them tapped her arm and pointed behind her. A tall smiling boy dropped beside her and, using his elbow, rocked her sideways, her whole body swaying, as he laughed.
She didn’t object, neither did she speak to him. Her fingers laced together, she averted her eyes, as—I saw—Ben labored to keep the ball between his feet, dancing around it, causing the opposing player to lurch and stumble. But Brady didn’t see Ben’s nimble move. She was distracted, looking down, her hands over her ears. With the tall boy beside her, she’d lost her smile and had stiffened.
Marta in her strange upright handwriting had eventually thanked me for the fudge, but she had never mentioned the note, the words of which now embarrassed me again, more acutely than the first time when, waiting to follow her home, she was nowhere to be seen.
Preoccupied with this memory, my back to the stands, I did not see Brady leave, and the tall boy was gone, too, though I had no way of telling whether they’d left together.
“That’s our first loss,” Ben said afterward. Had there been a scoreboard? I hadn’t noticed.
“I was sitting near Brady,” I said. “She was watching you.”
“Okay,” the boy said without emphasis.
“Isn’t that what you want?”
He was silent, his gym bag bumping his leg. After five steps he said, “I don’t know.”
I was sorry we were nearing the house, where I couldn’t speak to him as I wished. But passing the park bench where I’d killed time two days ago I suggested we sit for a while.
“Marta van der Velde had a friend,” I said, as I sat. “One of the bigger boys. A seventh grader.”
“Did you know him?”
“We didn’t know any of the older boys—not their names. They never spoke to us. Seventh graders were thirteen.”
“We’re all on the playground together,” Ben said.
“I don’t even think he was in our school.”
“Did she like him?”
“I think she was afraid of him. He was big. He made me feel small.”
Saying that I seized the boy’s attention. And I remembered Jack saying, He’s small for his age.
“He met her after school,” I said. “When we came out to the street he was there, waiting. She walked quickly over to him, being obedient, and she seemed afraid of him. He took charge of her, standing so close to her that when I walked by I could barely see her. His arms were around her, as though he was folded over her.”
“Did you say anything?”
“At first I didn’t know what to say.” I was looking closely at Ben. “Then the next day in class I said, ‘I’m going to California. I’m not sure when I’ll be back.’”
The boy squinted and looked doubtful, unprepared for “California.”
“It was a sunny, far-off place—palm trees, and heat, and the Pacific Ocean.”
“It was a lie.”
“It was a hope, Benny. It was a wish.”
I remembered more, another dream, of Africa: I wanted to know what no one else knew. I wanted to go where no one had ever gone. I did not want to be told anything; I wanted to be the teller.
“I felt small,” I said. “I wanted to impress her.”
The boy looked doubtful again, shaking his head slightly, with uncertain eyes.
“I loved her,” I said. “That was my way of telling her.”
And my belief was that if I am prevented from doing what I want to do, I will be unhappy. I knew I needed to be original in order to exist; to distinguish myself in some way to Marta and everyone else, to defend myself in doing this thing, whatever it might be, in art, or writing, or travel, and I knew nothing of any of those things, but if I dared and took a risk I might find out.
“Did you tell anyone?” Ben asked—he was thinking of I loved her.
“I couldn’t,” I said, and I now realized why: because I wanted to keep the secret in my heart. No one knew what it was. If I told anyone they’d tease me and tell me it was a weakness, and try to thwart me, because in the past whenever I revealed something I felt deeply about I was mocked.
“You could have told the girl.”
“Marta van der Velde,” I said. “I wanted her so badly.” I resisted saying that I hated that seventh grader who’d put his arms around her. “For a long time I didn’t want to think about it. I’m thinking about it now in a new way, and it’s very awkward. Do you understand?”
“You’re thinking about it now,” the boy stated plainly, and it seemed in his repeating it that it was proof of his understanding.
“It’s like this,” I said. “You receive something special in a big box. It’s very well packed—a painting, a lamp, a vase—and you unpack it carefully, saving all the wrapping. And when the object is unpacked and looking very small and delicate, you put it aside and take all the tissue, the padding and the Bubble Wrap, the straw and Styrofoam beads and put them all back in the box. But it won’t fit. A third of the stuff lies at your feet.” I found myself giggling sadly. “It just will not fit.”
The boy drew back, looking alarmed, and lifted his gym bag to his thighs as though to protect himself.
“How is it that you can take more out of a box than you can fit back in?” I said, my voice rising.
Clutching his gym bag, the boy looked as though he was going to cry.
“Memories are like that,” I said. “You’ve taken too much out. And you’re stuck with it.” Seeing that the boy seemed frightened and tearful, I said, “But I’m lucky. I became a writer. A writer can always dispose of those extra memories.”
“Where have you been?” Jack said, greeting us at the door, when we got to the house.
“We lost the game,” Ben said.
“Remember when I asked you what your parents said about me?” I asked Ben the next day on the way to school. I had stewed miserably in the night, and slept badly, recalling Marta van der Velde and I’m going to California.
The boy nodded, his face tightening, looking accused.
“‘He goes on and on about his new books,’ you said.”
“They said it,” the boy was swift in his rebuttal.
“It’s true—and you know why?”
He made a face, twisting it, to indicate he didn’t know or didn’t want to venture a guess.
“Because no one else does, Benny,” I said. “I need to keep the thought of my work alive in my mind, and sometimes talk about it, because I’m not sure it’s alive in anyone else’s mind.”
We continued to walk, Ben beside me, trudging again, as always his bewilderment evident in the way his feet moved.
“What else did they say?”
In a reciting voice, the boy said, “‘Writers are never satisfied with their books. But Andre is.’”
I was stung, but I laughed, admiring my son again. So it seemed I had fathered a wit, even if the wit was used against me.
“‘He’s arrogant’; I suppose they say that.”
Ben said, “No—they don’t.”
“But people do. It’s not arrogance—it’s a survival skill.” I thought again of Marta van der Velde. I said, “Do people say to you, ‘I know what you want, little boy!’”
“Sometimes.”
“But they never do. They never know. They used to say that to me. They thought they knew. But they had no idea, because they didn’t know me.” I lowered my head and looked at the boy. “You’re wondering what I wanted.”
The question startled him. He said, “I guess so.”
“I wanted to go where no one else went,” I said. “I wanted to know what no one else knew. I wanted to do what no one else did.”
“How do you do that?”
“By becoming a hero,” I said. “That’s what Marta van der Velde gave me. A wish to be bold. A determination to excel.”
“Action hero,” Ben said.
“I didn’t know that expression.” Then I covered my face. “Oh god, I’ve talked too much. Are you going to tell them? Promise me you won’t.”
“I promise,” he said, looking terrified.
That evening, Jack said, “We’ve got a dinner tonight. Some friends.”
Saying that always sounded to me as though my son was hinting that I was not a friend.
“I’m glad to babysit.”
“No. They’re coming here. They’re expecting you to be here.”
I relaxed at the thought of meeting new people—they might be readers. They were the Strawsons, Jack said: he in marketing, she a teacher. Their son was in Ben’s class.
“I’ll need to get ready,” I said and went up to my room and poured myself a large whiskey. Hearing the doorbell ring I waited until I heard greetings, then drank the last of my whiskey and joined my son and his friends.
“This is my father,” Jack said.
“Andre Parent,” I said and looked closely for any sign of recognition.
We ate, I listened, no questions were directed my way, I smiled and responded at the right moments, and toward the end of the meal Jack said across the table, “I’ve been meaning to ask you guys about your trip.”
“India.” And the man turned to me. “Have you been to India?”
“Many times. All over,” I said. “Wrote about it.”
But the man was still talking, describing his impressions of India, the poor people, the noise, the food, his wife chipping in with, “The crowds, the dust, the heat—you wouldn’t believe the squalor.”
“I just remembered,” I said. “I promised to tell Ben a story.”
“We’ll save you some dessert.”
The boy was too sleepy to listen. I sat by the bed, seeing myself in the boy, conjuring up the image of Marta van der Velde, whom I had not thought of for sixty-five years. Yet it was she who had aroused the desire in me that I took to be love—and it must have been love, because it had inspired my chivalrous wish to be a hero. The inspiration not a book, not a great historical figure, not a rousing speech by a teacher; but a shy pretty Dutch girl, newly arrived, with a smooth face and gray-blue eyes, a compact figure at the desk beside me, who had been claimed by an older boy. She had given me something else to love and long for.
I dozed, and when I woke, Jack was beside me, his hand on my shoulder.
“I must have nodded off.”
I tottered to my room yawning, but, having been abruptly awakened, could not get to sleep for a while. I remembered that Marta van der Velde had the beginnings of a figure—and I smiled in the dark. It was the purest love; nothing had preceded it, nor had I told anyone in my life. But my life is my response to that first love.
I woke late, Ben had gone to school. I regretted that I had missed him, the morning walk, the conversation with the boy that provoked memories.
They had finished breakfast. Laura was tidying. Fussing, putting things in order seemed to be her way of ignoring me, because in the act of tidying she could always blamelessly turn her back to me.
“Did you tell him?” she said.
Jack cleared his throat. “Laura has some friends coming later today. We’ll need your room.”
“Later today” meant I’d have to leave soon. But this sort of rudeness had the effect of making me excessively polite and accommodating, to remove the curse. I became hearty, I said I understood. I went upstairs to my room and gathered my clothes and my whiskey bottle and packed my bag. Then I sat in the parlor with my hands in my lap. I didn’t want to face them. What was there to say? I was being expelled.
“I got your car out of the garage,” Jack said. “It’s a tricky driveway.”
“That was thoughtful.”
“Benny will be sorry he missed you,” Laura called from the next room. I could see she was sorting magazines, flipping them, kneeling, facing away.
“Tell him something for me,” I said. “Tell him I’m going to California. I’m not sure when I’ll be back.”
There’s something particularly tantalizing about glimpsing into the world of the ultra-wealthy—the gleaming facades of their lives, their gilded social circles, and the dizzying power they wield. It’s a world of dazzling excess, but it’s also a world where darkness lurks just beneath the surface. Behind the perfectly curated appearances and million-dollar smiles lie secrets, rivalries, and desires that simmer and crackle like an unstable fault line, ready to erupt.
The obsession with the mega-rich isn’t new, but shows like Succession have sharpened our appetite for peeking behind the velvet curtain. Who really wins in a family bound by blood but driven by ruthless ambition? How far would someone go to protect their fortune—or claim it? Power, control, betrayal: these are the universal ingredients of great thrillers, but in the rarefied air of unimaginable wealth, they become something even darker and more dangerous. The rich, after all, are often as enigmatic as they are powerful—shielded by their privilege, yet exposed to the same human flaws as the rest of us.
When I was writing my novel, The Inheritance, I wanted to explore these very questions—how greed, ambition, and loyalty collide within families. The novel follows the Agarwals, who have gathered together on a private island off the west coast of Scotland ostensibly to celebrate their parents’ 40th wedding anniversary. But when a body is found, it becomes obvious that this reunion is about more than just celebrating family. The patriarch, Raj, is about to retire and sell the family business that he built from scratch. And on this trip, he’s due to announce how he plans to split the proceeds – three hundred million pounds – between his three adult children: the golden child Myra, the martyr son Aseem and the baby of the family, Aisha. All of them are vying for the largest share of the profits and all of them have hidden agendas and secrets they would die to protect. But only one of them is capable of murder…
The Inheritance tells the story of a close-knit but extremely dysfunctional family. Think Succession meets Agatha Christie’s Crooked House, but with a mega-rich Indian family. Who will survive this high-stakes reunion, and who will become a victim of their own greed?
In these 11 thrillers, you’ll find the themes of betrayal, secrecy, and ambition explored with razor-sharp intensity. Whether it’s the perfect family torn apart by scandal, a carefully maintained reputation in freefall, or power struggles that spiral out of control, these stories expose the shadows that haunt the wealthiest among us. The allure of money and power might seem irresistible, but as these novels—and The Inheritance—remind us, the lives of the mega-rich are often built on illusions that hide deep fractures. And in these thrillers, we get to indulge our schadenfreude as we watch those facades crumble.
Big Little Lies begins with a shocking death at an elementary school’s trivia night, rocking a community of affluent parents to their core. They want to know: Was this death an accident, or did something more sinister occur? In an idyllic setting of perfect families, perfect houses, and seemingly perfect lives, the truth is connected to three women whose picture perfect exteriors hide secrets and lies.
The Club is set at the much-anticipated launch party of The Home, a high-end members’ club for celebrities. Chaos ensues as away from the prying eyes of the media, the rich and famous let loose. The atmosphere drips with luxury and glamour, each guest bringing with them secrets, resentments, and hidden agendas. This is a thriller that’s as dark as it is gripping.
A poignant family drama with the pace of a thriller, Lockhart’s novel centers on the Sinclairs, a wealthy family with a perfect veneer, a family full of lies, tragedy, and guilt. The novel’s twisty narrative draws readers into a dark tale of privilege, loss, and betrayal, as the protagonist, Cadence, tries to piece together her fractured memories of the tragic accident that tore her family apart.
Two women, from vastly different backgrounds, find their lives entwined in this novel that delves into the world of luxury, deceit, and revenge. One is a grifter, and the other, a wealthy socialite. Throw in a plot abounding with secrets and you have a twisty thriller that explores the disparity between rich and poor, while building suspense around what happens when the two worlds collide.
Set against the backdrop of Nantucket’s elite, this thriller follows a wedding weekend that quickly takes a dark turn when a murder occurs. Hilderbrand’s exploration of secrets within a privileged family reveals the cracks in their seemingly flawless lives.
This psychological thriller tells the story of Amber Patterson, a woman who infiltrates the life of a wealthy couple with sinister intentions. She is determined to take the place of the perfect, seemingly untouchable wife, and the narrative unravels with shocking twists as Amber’s own secrets are revealed.
Paul Ross is a self-made lawyer who marries Merrill Darling, the daughter of a billionaire, and has gotten used to their lifestyle. But when a financial investigation threatens to bring down the family, Paul has to decide where his loyalties lie. As a former analyst at Goldman Sachs, Cristina Alger draws on her unique insider’s perspective to give us a glimpse into the highest echelons of New York society and the high stakes that often accompany a life of unimaginable wealth and success.
Set against the backdrop of New York City’s exclusive social scene, this novel follows the life of a young woman, Louise, who becomes obsessed with the glamorous and elusive Lavinia. As their friendship becomes more twisted, dark secrets come to light, revealing the cutthroat nature of the city’s elite.
A modern reimagining of Shakespeare’s King Lear, this novel takes place in the world of India’s ultra-wealthy. When an aging hotel tycoon attempts to split his company shares between his three adult daughters, his youngest refuses to play into his wishes, and a family-wide power struggle begins. Taneja’s exploration of family dynamics and the pursuit of power highlights the dangerous consequences of being born into privilege.
The powerful Wadia family controls New Delhi, but their future rests in the hands of three individuals: Sunny, the playboy heir to the family fortune; Ajay, a servant, who was born in poverty; and Neda, a journalist grappling with what is right. Set against the backdrop of India’s political and business elite, this novel paints a vivid picture of the excess, corruption and moral decay that often comes with immense wealth.
Even through the roar and effervescence of the 1920s, everyone in New York has heard of Benjamin and Helen Rask. Together, they have risen to the very top of a world of seemingly endless wealth. But at what cost have they acquired their immense fortune? In Trust, Diaz explores the life of a wealthy financier in the early 20th century, unravelling the complexities of his empire through multiple perspectives. The novel questions the nature of truth, wealth, and the lengths to which the ultra-rich will go to protect their legacies.
Literature often captures the moments between life’s major plot points—the quiet yet profound spaces where we question choices, find love, navigate loss, and search for meaning. The books featured here, published by small presses, are rich in their ability to reflect the textured understanding of both our individual and collective worlds.
From the wreckage of broken families and personal failures to the resilience found in unexpected friendships, healing, and self-discovery, these works carry threads of hope and humanity. They showcase the lyrical, the strange, and the deeply moving ways in which small press authors weave their narratives.
This list, while a mere glimpse of the incredible work produced by small presses, highlights the talent and diversity in today’s literary landscape. These 15 titles invite us to examine our world, our choices, and the stories that shape our lives, offering profound insights.
A paramedic loses her ability to compartmentalize after a terrible accident, while at the same time, her marriage is destabilized by an unplanned pregnancy; a recent college graduate swirls through unemployment and parties until what she assumes is just a temporary retail job upends her life; a deeply unqualified—but well dressed—office worker at a university allows her conventionally unattractive colleague to do her work, but at a cost. Set in the American Midwest, the characters in these stories are linked by the desire for something more than the lives they are currently living, even though they often engage in acts of self-sabotage. Juxtaposing dark humor and lyrical writing, Bell captures the strange but emotionally charged interactions we have with family, coworkers, strangers, and even ourselves to dazzling effect.
Daniel Losman is an American translator living in Copenhagen. While struggling with a difficult translation project, his neighbor dies. Through this tragedy, he meets a woman in his building and begins to develop romantic feelings for her.
At the same time, Losman is separated from the mother of his child. He comes across an advertisement for a study involving a new drug that helps people uncover traumatic memories from their past. Hoping it will help him, and worried that his son might have Tourette’s syndrome like he does, Losman signs up for the study.
As he delves deeper into the study and becomes more involved with the drug, Losman’s translation project continues to fall apart. His search for answers about his past and his desire to protect his son intertwine in a way that is both wild and emotional.
A woman takes a job at a camp for wealthy, wayward boys, who are doomed to repeat their mistakes; a bookstore employee is hired by two women to nanny their teenage daughter and the nanny and child acts as wild as the dogs they release from leashes in the neighborhood; a pastoral Californian commune descends into a suicide cult; and siblings escape to find their father in New York City. Steeped in the longing of paths not taken, and informed by a sometimes brutal sense of the road chosen, Stuber’s stories surface the undercurrent of restlessness—and recklessness—that roils under the veneer of mundanity. The eponymous sad grownups in this collection have not figured out what will make them happier, and Stuber lays their lives bare in raw detail.
A doll with crank-operated hair named Tressie Tessie haunts the stories in this collection. A photo of the doll hovers over the dollmaker’s son as he is dying and falling in love at the same time. Tressie Tessie is on the shelf at a sketchy hotel staffed by an adolescent who should be in school but is truant in order to financially provide for his deeply depressed mother. And when the corpse of Reecie, a beloved family man and race car driver, is paraded around the dirt racing track, the specter of the doll is there too. Across these stories, Troy follows families and individuals in central Missouri as they chose to stay, get out, or return. A compelling collection that echoes both the discordant and the deeply interconnected experiences of small town life in the Midwest.
Jin Lee is an emergency room doctor working during the Covid pandemic. His wife Amy is a novelist struggling with her second book. The Lees have suffered the worst pain of parenthood: the accidental death of their infant child. Their older daughter, ten-year-old Lucie, is also reckoning with heartbreak, and in an attempt to bring joy back into the family home, the family adopts a rabbit—and the process of caring for the animal helps them to heal. But when Amy’s estranged mother comes to live with the Lees after an accident, they are thrust back into disarray, even though Lucie finds a powerful connection with her grandmother. In The Burrow, Cheng peels through layer after layer of grief and regret until she uncovers the core of a family capable of deep forgiveness.
A group of queer moms who share the same sperm donor—nicknamed “Jake Gyllenhaal”—hold annual retreats across the country, where they experience a brush with both danger and celebrity; a newish grad, who really wants to do better in her life, tries to get it together for her partner and build a life in Arizona, only to be dumped anyway; a mom takes her kids on a road trip outside of D.C. during Covid and is forced to reckon with her parenting style. In these eight stories, Crotty takes a deep look at what women give, and what they give up. Each story is a world unto itself, but the collection as a whole is connected through the feeling of being misunderstood.
When Ayşegül Savaş had her first child, she was living in Paris. Her mother visits from Istanbul to help with the baby during a time when Savaş is struggling. In one compelling scene, Savaş shares photos of her home filled with pretty candles and bowls of fruit, even though inside she is melting just like the wax. This collection of short essays chronicles the juxtaposition of the joy of new life with the terror of parenting: when your body is not your own, when you are powerless to help your child, when your nipples are raw but the baby still needs to nurse. There is a frankness in The Wilderness that many readers will appreciate. The “wilderness”—in this instance, the unknown—is present and clear, even if the way out is not. A mesmerizing exploration of new motherhood.
A mother and daughter bond with their husband and father’s second wife; dead parents haunt their daughter’s bedroom door; and a young woman finds power in auto-eroticism. In these stories, Zambrano explores the deep complexity of family dynamics, the dual terror and joy of parenthood, and the particular place that women hold across social structures. Set mostly in India, the collection is linked by desire, heartbreak, and also defiance—the characters find agency even when the world around them tries to deny it. Zambrano is known as a flash fiction writer, but the few longer stories in this book have the same punch and resonance as the very short ones. Written with emotional clarity and an undercurrent of feminist rage, Ruined A Little When We Are Born is not to be missed.
Preteen Sissy is an outcast at her new school. Tormented by bullies, she fights back against one of the boys, and catches the attention of Tegan, a fellow student who glows with confidence. The two become fast, if complicated, friends, both struggling with strained relationships with their mothers. Sissy’s mother battles depression, leaving Sissy to fend for herself. Meanwhile, Tegan’s conflict with her mother is so intense that she stays with her older sister during the school week. Largely unsupervised, the adolescents are free to explore—and they are just starting to realize both the power their bodies have and the dangers that it exposes them to. A coming-of-age story both tender and sophisticated, Amphibian deftly captures the in-between of girlhood and womanhood.
Two math scholars struggle to keep their relationship intact as they navigate the turmoil of multiple cross-country moves, ultimately doomed by Agnes Callard’s idea that “true lovers” want love only out of their respective unhappiness. In the title story, Norbert Wiener’s notion of cybernetics shapes a series of infidelities. In another story, Nietzsche’s Zarathustra makes an appearance on a dating game show. Wahl uses philosophy as a launching point to explore dating, love, coupling, and breakups. Her canny ability to find the emotional core of romantic relationships makes this collection compelling, even for readers who have never picked up a volume of Wittgenstein. Wahl’s characters, often obsessed with their own intellect and degrees, are as fallible as anyone, making this collection both smart and inventive.
Set against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War, which began in 1936 and ended in 1939, Isidro and Mariana are deeply involved the battle against fascism. Isidro has left his small Basque village to join the frontline as a fighter, and Mariana writes extensively against the government, fully aware that her work is putting her and her children in danger. When Isidro and Mariana cross paths, their brief but passionate encounter is emblematic of so many of the relationships in the book: often by chance, but deeply meaningful. Zabalbeascoa’s characters cannot foresee the tragic end to the war, but readers do, and this chilling knowledge adds to the tension in this compelling and hauntingly prescient novel.
West Virginia University Press: Softie: Stories by Megan Howell
A girl is obsessed by her older, predatory lover’s earlobes; a woman tries to convince the absent father of her child to leave the hotel where he is squatting; a teenager gives birth to a child who immediately devours her; a sister is killed by a neighbor’s husband hurtling a mini-fridge into the stairwell as the other sister looks on. In this collection, change is central, whether emotionally, bodily, or fantastically. Magical realism sits side-by-side with hyperrealism in these stories, and Megan Howell weaves in questions of race, class, and gender seamlessly with elements of transmogrification. Even when a caretaker absconds with her charge—once a middle-aged man, now small enough to be sucked up by a vacuum—it still feels relatable. Softie is beautifully infused with longing for connection and acceptance.
A composer tumbles down a steep set of stairs while on a trip in Venice with his wife, a collage artist. He physically survives, but becomes selectively mute. Back home in New York City, the authorities are not convinced the fall was an accident, and they have some questions for the wife. She also has questions—many questions—for her husband, which he either can’t or won’t answer. At the same time, she experiences a nearly manic productivity with her own work, and the canvases pile up. In this meditative novella, Deal weaves together fragments of memory, song lyrics, snippets from magazine articles, and philosophical ideas to build a line of inquiry about what it means to exist as an artist in the world—and how to continue on when a partnership has been shaken. Thoughtful and provocative.
In 1921, Harrell Hickman returns from World War I with shell-shock and an addiction to laudanum. With his parents dead and nothing to keep him in Baltimore, he makes his way west. The young, troubled man finds kindness among travelers, and especially from fellow veterans recovering from the horror of war. On the high plains, he finds support in the owner of a mercantile, and steady work at a sprawling ranch near the Wyoming border. As his distress, fueled by opioids, intensifies, Hickman can neither silence the voices in his head nor escape the way his experiences as a soldier have numbed him to violence. Told in tight, spare prose, The Deadening is a western that offers all the wide open spaces—and tragedies—that come with the genre.
E and M are two sentient stone gargoyles freed from the side of a church church. They are wandering the southwestern United States in search of water when they meet Rose and Dolores, two human climate refugees. The four form an unlikely group, making their way across the scorched desert on a journey to reach an elusive city, hoping for a safer home for them all. Even in this post-apocalyptic landscape, entrepreneurs and academics chase grant money and write reports to try to understand the alchemy that breathed consciousness into statues and animated trees. In this speculative cli-fi novel, Campbell creates a world that feels both fantastical and familiar in what is ultimately a cautionary tale of a warming and drought-stricken earth where its inhabitants are driven to violence in order to survive.
DON’T MISS OUT
Sign up for our newsletter to get submission announcements and stay on top of our best work.
YOUR INBOX IS LIT
Enjoy strange, diverting work from The Commuter on Mondays, absorbing fiction from Recommended Reading on Wednesdays, and a roundup of our best work of the week on Fridays. Personalize your subscription preferences here.