REVIEW: No Other by Mark Gluth

Mark Gluth’s No Other details a family’s downfall. Irreparably split by its patriarch’s suicide early in the novel, the family attempts to cleave together, but these misunderstood characters never quite learn each other’s motivations.

This is surely a dysfunctional family: Karen, the mother is a drunk. Tuesday, her oldest daughter, finds her father dead after he commits suicide. Hague, their son, observes his damaged family and berates himself for not knowing how help or to fix it. When Karen falls and Hague gets hurt, we see Karen’s selfishness:

Something slipped and she was back on her back. His balance was off and he fell forward. It was his brow that hit the coffee table’s edge. He heard it as it happened. Karen yelped. He was kneeling, reeling. He touched his head where it hurt. His skin peeled back. Something stuck to his brow. Her voice was this dull him beneath the ringing in his ears. What she said was that she was worried that she had really hurt herself.

Karen has been dealt a bad hand, but she is mean to her children. Hague internalizes the family’s lot. “Karen slapped Tuesday.” Gluth tells us. “She thought it was reasonable though she’d forgotten the reason. It was how drunk she was.” So it goes for most of the book, but a few revelations in the second half show us that we can’t take any of the character’s actions at face value. There is more to Karen than her role as the nasty drunk or the bad mother. Gluth’s strengths as a writer elevate this story above being a simple tale about how a family falls apart.

Gluth’s direct and declarative writing style gives No Other a stream-of-consciousness touch despite its constantly shifting third person point of view. The first part of the book is told from the perspective of Hague.

He poured some dog food into a bowl. He walked outside and set it down. The sky was a screen. It was all faded spray from the sun. He walked inside, flicked the knob on the TV. It was static. He stood in the kitchen and opened the fridge then the cupboard. The stove smelled like it was burning while he made macaroni and cheese. He dumped ketchup in a mound on his plate. He walked around the house. When he got into the static it was because he didn’t hear it until he forced himself to. He thought that meant that it was everywhere. It awed him.

Gluth’s narration allows us to understand how it is that his family misreads Hague. As well, the piling-on of these simple sentences also provides opportunities for striking, poetic observations. Often a sentence describing setting or character action is followed up with an explanation: “The sun hit the bleachers but he couldn’t feel it. It was the air.” Though these almost child-like statements aren’t meant to function as anything symbolic, their collective effect shows us that these characters create meaning out of the observable. Their lack of concern for metaphor is, itself, revealing.

No Other is structured in such a way that important facts come too late and often to the reader, rather than the characters who need the facts the most. This is the tragedy of No Other: Gluth uses the element of time to downplay major plot points. This echoes the way his novel works on a sentence level; he downplays his subjects using understatement. About midway into the book we switch from Hague to Tuesday, and learn, simply, “When Tuesday was alone she turned on the furnace and all the lights. On Christmas she just slept because she didn’t have to work. When she woke up it’d been a year…” Another tragedy had befallen the family. Tuesday, by then also self-destructive and repeating her mother’s behaviors that drove her away, is powerless against the tragedy her family has piled on.

This is a beautiful novel on a sentence level, and certainly a book for anyone who likes fiction without overdone narration or forced metaphor. The candor of Gluth’s narrative style makes for many striking passages. “Her thoughts were images strung from moods,” he says at one point, and later, “She said It will only be a couple of days. She said she loved her. After she hugged her Tuesday was emptied of everything except anxiety.” In No Other, Gluth shows us that the world doesn’t need to be forced into literary form to have meaning. His aim is to have us watch the family split along the hairline cracks forming between each bond. Once it begins, there is no stopping their undoing and watching it happen is sad. But the beauty of Gluth’s prose offers many opportunities for pause. He finds beauty in simple observations, often in the gaps between things. “The door opened,” he says. “It let in people and light.”

To purchase No Other, click here to be directed to Sator Press’s site.

Sunday Sundries: Literary Links from Around the Web (Dec. 28th)

Looking for some Sunday reading? Here are some literary links from around the web that you might have missed:

Kirkus profiles the space opera Culture books of the late Iain M. Banks

Boing Boing looks at how Ishiguro wrote The Remains of the Day in a month

Apparently readers are getting tired of celebrity memoirs (queue tiny Paris Hilton-branded violin)

From the Electric Literature vaults: A Christmas Card from Etgar Keret

How Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett collaborated on Good Omens

Speaking of Neil Gaiman, Christmas is passed but here’s Gaiman reading A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens

The Toast continues being hilarious with the passive-aggressive guide to book gifting

Ploughshares profiles some new exciting lit mags — including our own Okey-Panky!

The Times takes a look at the work of crime-master Raymond Chandler

Making the jump from SF films to SF books

Naomi Klein says the rise of dystopian fiction is a warning we should heed

Did you get a Kindle or Nook for Xmas? The Millions has a handy guide to your new e-reader

Neil Gaiman reads “A Christmas Carol” for Christmas

It’s Christmas Eve and what better way to celebrate than listened to acclaimed author Neil Gaiman read “A Christmas Carol” by Charles Dickens? The above audio courtesy of the New York Public Library.

Deathwinked

by Vedran Husić, recommended by Fine Arts Work Center

I hear, the axe has bloomed,
I hear, the place is not nameable,
I hear, they call life
our only refuge.

Paul Celan, “I Hear, the axe has bloomed”

We called sniper alley the alley of wolves. We were young and boys and had nicknames for everything, first of all the girls. There was the Nanny, the Epilogue, and the Soulcrusher. We thought these nicknames very clever, breathless with truth. We were thirteen and easily excited. To be killed by a sniper meant to be deathwinked, a verb. I came up with that. I had a minimum understanding of poetry, a maximum amount of fear.

We ran across the alley of wolves to test our recent manhood, among other things. We ran because there was nothing better to do. We ran because it was more bearable than standing still. We were young and anxious to be brave. We were practicing martyrs. Our fathers were gone; mine gone forever, heaven-swallowed one winter night at the front. Miralem’s father was still at the front, firing his gun at the threatening distance. All three of us dreamed of soldierhood and feared that the war would soon run out. Edin’s father had come back from the front and was gone in yet another way, halfway between the gone of Miralem’s father and the never coming back of my father. He was crazy, according to the completely not insane. He spoke the names of the dead, but not in his sleep, like normal people. He confused the living for the dead, which worried the living. We all smiled at him and pitied him the best we could. We smiled at him and measured our sanity against his truth. Edin took it all in stride, in run, explaining it away through philosophy, intellectualizing the problem until the problem grew wings. His father’s rants did not bother him, but it bothered his family, who wanted to institutionalize the father. But there were no institutions left. Edin argued that to call somebody insane was ridiculous in time of war. Nobody in his family listened to him; he was thirteen, which is its own form of insanity.

Our fathers were gone, and our mothers had no authority over us. We loved them, our unreluctant Slavic mothers, but we loved our courage more. “War is our true mother,” Edin once said, inspired and dumbfounded. “Unable to give birth, men make war,” he said another time. Edin was the oldest by a month, a small lifetime, had slow blue eyes, and spoke deliberately, like a drunk wanting to be understood. He liked Kierkegaard; he liked the idea of Kierkegaard. He argued about religion, for and against it. His father had taught philosophy and was now insane, or within untiring reach of insanity. His family had been wealthy, but now money did not matter, had lost meaning. It was wartime and everything was free, and everybody on the eastern side of Mostar was equal as the dead are equal. The dream of Communism bloomed among casual shell bursts and articulate sniper fire, on the eastern side of a town without bridges. Eastsiders have nothing to lose but their lives, and an afterworld to gain. Alley-runners of all countries unite!

The family library lay in rubble, but some of the books had been saved, and being the only books left, they were many times read and meticulously understood by Edin. Edin came up with the name “alley of wolves” and it had been his idea to run across it. To impress the Epilogue more than anything else. Larger reasons became apparent only later, and by virtue of their late arrival sounded like excuses. Ideas were Edin’s guardian angels; he had a whole tear-bright choir of them. Beyond the grave there will be singing. He had bulletproof testosterone. A missionary’s courage. There were doubters to convert to something less than doubt. There were detractors to prove wrong. And death proved everybody wrong, eventually, always. We congregated near a spilling set of trashcans, behind buildings bruised by mortar fire. Houses in every state of uninhabitable lined the alley on one side, walls left to stand as monuments to futility, while on the other side stood nothing, open space and a gravel path leading down to the river. And up ahead, the nothing-goal, more desolated houses and the mute storefronts of empty shops, and the stone remains of a mosque, with its third of a minaret, and the promise of intermission and the burden, almost motherly, of the run back. A small and narrow street, strewn with garbage and garbage-scented, our ground of play. These adjectives come easy, self-compounded at birth.

Mostar, my city, you are far from me now, but I peek through the spyglass and you appear so near. In my third floor apartment, in the neverdesperate America of my childhood dreams, at my desk, armed with pencil and paper, sensitive as a landmine, fumbling similes like live grenades, I, the young, triple-tongued poet, write down the name of my birthcity like the name of a former lover. Mostar. Mostar, my city, stunned quiet. They took the Most, threw it into the river and made you unnamable. My city, one night you went dark all around me. You trembled and could not be embraced. The bombs fell on you, near-constant and heartbeatloud. I recommend war-tourism to any artist, poet especially, a month or so of up-close-death, a month, or twenty-three, of dark-houred explosions in a world maddened by sirens. You’ll never lack material, or have to account for sudden mood swings, and you’ll never lose at those drunken games between friends, intimate games, those poetic games of whosufferedmost.

Three floors are enough to kill a man. The truthhearing poet gives the truthsharpened tip of his pencil a lick, he writes: “Three floors are enough to kill a man/There can be no hate without memory/To love is to imagine/In the white noise of other feelings.” That with his pencil the poet writes the truth is implied, was implied, is implied no longer. He gives the pencil another swift lick, he writes: “All children pretend/Their games are serious/All games have rules/Even the games of animals/Have rules.” Our game had but a few rules. If you ran last yesterday, you must run first today. That was one rule. If you ran across the alley to the other side, you must run back. That was rule number two, for there was another way back, sniper-less but long. And there were rules of which we were ignorant, the secret rules of the sniper. But whether the sniper followed any rules was left to debate. Sundays we did not run. Yesterday, Miralem had run last; he would run first today. Who would run second was decided by a coin toss. Edin would run second. I, last. Tomorrow I would run first. Tomorrow I would not run.

The time leading up to the first run was the happiest time of the day, our concentration lax, our muscles fearful and limber, the words between us intimate, unexpected, binding. Sometimes we sang. It was morning, during the week of lentil soup. Miralem stretched his arms and legs, while Edin and I sat on opposing stubs of stone arguing in war-hushed tones. The blue sky promised no rain, and the sun looked a blotchy and vague yellow. Miralem threw one arm behind his back and pressed the bent elbow with his other hand, his legs wide apart, his torso stout and armless. The amber-sheen of autumn leaves, the gazelle-like wind, the abashed leaf-rustle, they all spoke in different languages about the same things. Beauty. Nature. Truth. Poetry. We spoke of philosophy, Edin and I, while Miralem quietly and thoughtfully stretched, and in the new dawn’s unraveling silence, under a sky morningpureblue, the sniper fired the first shot of a long day. Bullet, trashcan, a metal ping almost adorable, almost loud. We turned our heads toward the sound, then toward each other, then back. We resumed our conversation and Miralem joined us. He was arguably pretty, one of those who narrowed their eyes when they grinned, one of those who gestured with their fists. His eyes were green, a little blue, and he had a full Slavic forehead, broad and thought-pale. He was short but athletic; he was short and had a temper. He did not like tall girls. He did not like the Soulcrusher, with whom I played games in death-proof basements. There we spoiled each other for our future selves. He brought daily lilies for the Nanny and kissed her deeply, with a more meaningful tongue, with more daring and saliva than I ever did Selma. I write her name like the name of something lost. She knew how to swing the hips she did not have. She knew how to haggle good enough and long enough to make you give up everything. With her smile she fooled you into laughing at yourself. With her laughing eyes she crushed your soul. She dreamed of a husband with money. She dreamed of big hips. A skirtful of memories, everything I have, for a handful of her skirt.

Miralem had played soccer before the war, before the cemetery turn of every idle field, before the dead packed stadiums; he was fast, his run was urgent and blind, it was a sprint, and he ran with his head down. And yesterday he’d tripped and fallen a yard or so from safety. The sniper had fired and missed. He did not fire again. A little dust rose, it settled. Miralem was on the other side by then, bent over, with his hands on his knees, breathing greedily. He did not fire again as if to let us take in the full magnitude of his miss, or to impress us with his patience. The confidence of those with death on their side, how could we ever understand it? Miralem said nothing when we got to him, his tender calm edging on some kind of bewilderment, and after the run back, we walked home in silence, and parted from each other in silence, the silence of raised stakes. Now Miralem ridiculed the sniper, saying that he missed because he was a bad shot, and not on purpose, saying he was some fat, pimply boy playing at war, and not a man of many battles, not a man at all, just a novice at death and not worth the fantasy of our revenge. But Edin wouldn’t have it. No, to him he was a man and a master, a Machiavellian sniper-prince, with a nihilist’s love of beauty; his aim is steady and true, he shoots you with a shot made of lead, his slit eye is Catholic blue. Edin had read his Celan, saved from the rubble. Death is a master from the Balkans. But it is more intimate than that. He is a close relation, the mysterious uncle bearing strange gifts at each prophetic visit, the one who winks at you behind your parent’s back. We were brought up on his knee, on the black milk of his wisdom. Our blood is his blood. The one who waltzes you across the alley of wolves, the one who lets you stand on his feet as you move against each other in this gently wicked dance. Our songs are his songs. He sings into your hair as you dance. He whispers in your ear, forbids you to stop.

Miralem ran across the alley, with his head down, with his head only slightly lifted toward the end. Alive on the other side, he grinned at us, his eyes almost closed. Then it was gone, the grin, memory-wiped, collapsed into a thinking pout. The sniper had not fired. Sometimes he didn’t. And when he didn’t he blessed our run with innocence, like running before the war. Sometimes that was what we wanted. We had run for a month now, had been in this war for years, and weren’t getting any wiser. So why not go back? To a time of sparrow-enswirled minarets and non-firewood lindens, to a time of packed café terraces and their murmur like rushing water, when death and its mirror image, life in war, were as distant as nightmares after waking. In front of our buildings, punched blue and black by rockets, was a large courtyard, and this courtyard had been the setting of our first game, a game of collection. Under the spell of sunlight and tall grass, we’d search for bullet shells and find also glinting syringes, uncapped bottles of pills, an occasional limb abstracted from the body. One day, we found a mortar shell the size of a baby seal, unexploded. We dared each other to touch it. Edin moved toward it, extending an unsteady finger. “BOOM,” Miralem yelled at the point of contact, and Edin jumped back. Miralem laughed and Edin fumed. They fought it out, and afterwards both fumed. And as they sat on opposite sides of the projectile, not looking at each other, I got up from my seat and placed my palm against its belly. The metal was scorched by the sun and felt smooth and naked to the touch. I let my fingers linger haughtily, waiting for them to notice. I felt an upward rush of courage, like a declaration. Miralem and Edin joined me, our three hands pressed against the hot metal in a silent oath. That was when we knew we wanted to be soldiers and never die.

Beyond the broken-down stores and houses, beyond the kneeling minaret, on the side which we first ran to reach, was their headquarters, in the sandbagged gymnasium of a shell-bitten and nearly roofless elementary school. We peeked on three soldiers, all three young; we watched them gather by a corner table, watched two of them sit on upturned milk crates and the other stand; watched them eat lentil soup from a can that was warmed by old-fashioned fire; watched them listen to a portable radio as they ate with no hope of satiation; watched their hands busily scratch and their lips seldom move; watched all three turn toward the radio when the human voice got lost behind an unrelenting tearing of sandpaper. The soldiers went back to patrol the rubble and we watched them walk away, toward danger, unafraid and amused. There was something solemn about their amusement, something sensual and elusive about the way they carried themselves, in their warstained boots and burden-heavy uniforms, something eerily casual about the guns slung over their shoulders, lustful and sentimental about their lack of helmets. What bleak respect we had for them, all God-like and dusty-loined. They were not so much defenders of our city as defenders of our dream of the city. The odds were against them, but the crowd on their side, the cheer of the wind in the trees.

We wandered about for a while, wasting time before our run back. It was getting to be noon, the shadows growing long and ragged. Women appeared on the street, braving their way to market, located makeshift in one of the rear classrooms, smuggled goods. Once, we had looked for ingredients to make a cake for my birthday and found nothing but a nestful of eggs. We had the party in a basement, with no cake, but with many candles, more than was my age. In another yard, a new breed of child explorers rummaged for shells in the overgrown grass, their pockets full of singing. Farther east, toward Stolac, a blue-grey tower of smoke had risen, straying from its origin, swallowing houses whole along its path. We saw the absence of the bridge and a gentle curve of river below. The Old Bridge was gone, but the Neretva River was still here, flowing bright and prewar green. The river doesn’t care. The river has seen worse. The river is not concerned with what we throw in it: debris, bodies, blood, and stone, the water stitches it all to a mend, never stopping to wonder what we send downriverflowing. We climbed a garage and flopped down on our bellies. With our voices love-timid, our stares remote, we looked over our half of the city. Behind us, the boughs of a large tree whose name we had not yet learned shielded us from danger. Green mountains and hills enclosed us on all sides, separating us from our enemies but not from ourselves. The piled smoke rose still higher, spread out greater than a cathedral, more clouded than the idea of God. Sparrows chirped, crests chirped, gunfire chirped. The waxwing had flown south, summer was over. The dandelions had been beheaded; the lilies had hanged themselves. It was autumn now and nothing bloomed, except the yearlong ax.

Miralem was on the starting side again, alive and well and one day braver, while Edin stood on the edge of safety, waiting to run. He stood just behind a little shop, its interior grey and plundered. Before the war, I’d run there to get emergency Vegeta for my mother, and sometimes its owner, old and Hellenic Mr. Salemović, would call me into the back and ask me to stack some items for him, rewarding my impromptu work with free candy. I remember red jars of Ajvar, tall glass bottles of Laro Juice, and those compact silver cans of Eva Sardines, with a waving walrus dressed as a sailor on the blue cover. I remember Dorina Chocolates and Bananko Bars, Bajadera Pralines and Napolitanke Wafers, and Jaffa Cookies with their chocolate skins and orange jelly hearts. I remember a balance scale on the counter, with numerous dust-colored weights in increasing sizes of mass; I remember the slow sway of its thin shoulders, the delicate movements of its plates, their eventual, hard-earned symmetry. One surging whiff of Vegeta and I’m back in a light-filled kitchen, beside my mother who smells of red vegetables and spices, standing innocently in the way and marveling at her instinctual measurements. Just one whiff and I remember my mother, half-orphaned by one war, wholly divorced by another, tasting the sauce and smiling down at me her expert opinion. Music comes from the living room, where my father is taking his afternoon nap. This tells me that we already ate, that the food being prepared is for tomorrow, that despite the Sunday texture of this memory, this is more likely a work day, a day my mother will end at the hospital, where she will begin the new day, working at her typewriter, giving injections, changing sheets. The number of coffee cups on the table tells me there will be guests, our next-door neighbors, a Catholic man who always guessed the card in my hand and his Muslim wife who could read the future in the muddy remnants of the coffee.

Edin stood on the brink of danger, waiting to prove his bravery. But in war everybody is brave, even the coward. Even the sniper at his post, beguiling the fates. The three soldiers patrolling the rubble, they were braving another day of boredom, their courage doomed. Huddled around the radio, they waited for the news to tell them what they already knew. The war will not end today. The children in the tall grass, in the bloom of their inexperience, they were brave without knowing. The women in search of food, carrying their grief inside them like a long pregnancy, their bravery no conciliation for their loss. Everybody is brave in wartime. Everybody wise, even the fool with his warning. We were just braver, the answered prayers of our patient tormenters. Victims of our own death-mined wisdom. Strange prideful lambs, we made our courage our God. Like every rose is a flower, every Slav boy is an Icarus.

Edin was on the verge of his run, waiting for a favorable sign that only he knew how to tell. Then, suddenly, he was off, his footsteps echoing bluntly in the empty street, his thin vicious elbows stabbing the air behind him. The sniper fired and Edin crashed to the soundless asphalt.

Deathwinked.

I thought I screamed, I thought I tore my mouth with my voice, but my cry, its angular fury, was only imagined. I took a couple of steps toward Edin, to soothe the distance between us, but Miralem raised his palm and I obeyed. We looked on from the disbelief of safety, looked at his unflinching body, waiting for loyalty to move us, for fear to release us, for courage to break us free. I wiped my tears on my sleeve; I looked at Miralem and knew. He lowered his hand and we ran. A new game had begun, a game of retrieval. I grabbed Edin under his armpits and Miralem grabbed him by his ankles. We carried Edin home, running. The sun was in my eyes; I thought I would trip. I felt the weight of his body like never before. The sniper did not fire.

And now? What now? Why stop one’s war story in mid-exhalation? Why bring in the present to take revenge on the past? The past, which is our only refuge. Now my sleep is fragmented by nightmares. Now I’m ghost-weary, my tongue a cripple. Now I lean out of my window and think about ending this chance-riddled life, but can never keep my eyes closed long enough. Now I walk barefoot in my apartment trying to catch in a mason jar every flicker of my insanity. Now I sit at my desk and write.

The sniper did not fire.

Now that the war is over we laugh that it ever began. But even now we hunger for the right man to lead us down the wrong path again. For even now, in some small, divided village, a Milošević is waiting to be stubbornly born.

Now the exhumed graves are again silenced with our soil.

Now the past is burned like sheets of infidelity.

Now, in comfortable prisons, under supervision kind and condescending, sworn enemies bond over a game of cards.

REVIEW: Love Me Back by Merritt Tierce

by Courtney Maum

When I started reading Merritt Tierce’s debut novel about a self-destructive waitress, by page four I thought Tierce had penned the greatest restaurant book on earth. By page six, when protagonist Marie is telling a man she’s had a threesome with and his fiancé about the Christmas dinner specials, I had the shivers: when the fiancé reels about how heavy Marie’s tray looks, Marie quips “If I throw my back out I’ve got your man’s number,” to customers delighted to have landed the table manned by the smart girl. From the get-go, it’s clear that this is an author who understands the perverse power that comes from allowing our female bodies to be used. Which is to say: this is a book that talks about how powerful and fragile and dangerous it is to be a woman living, working, and reproducing in the world we know today.

Love Me Back is restaurant fiction, but it’s mother fiction, too. We meet Marie when she’s a single mom working at a four-star Dallas steakhouse, but we get glimpses of her life when she was a younger and less careful waitress at chain places like Chili’s where she gets fired for selling Vicodin leftover from a dental job. Our Marie is unflappable behind her apron’s armor, so time-tested and ass-grabbed that Danny, the drug-addled general manager at the steakhouse (called “The Restaurant”) assures her that she’s “golden” there. But on her time off, the one constant that hums through this woman’s spiraling body is the siren pull of the baby daughter she didn’t expect, but birthed, and loved, and abandoned, and loves, and keeps abandoning again.

In a book so visceral and vitriolic that Tierce’s insights come at you like thrown acid, it’s hard to pin down the one thing that should make you read it. But for the mothers out there, Tierce has captured the frantic desire to both protect and expel these creatures that come out screaming, red-faced from us, expecting the whole world. Marie is a young mother with a lifetime of truly terrible decisions at her back, and the thing that is so heart-wrenching about her struggle is that Marie is at her most maternal when she’s demoralizing herself.

In an unnamed chapter towards the novel’s end, having ignored her ex-husband’s calls that carry news of their daughter’s illness, Marie returns home with a sex-partner she calls “The Hateful Man” and unplugs her ringing phone to allow him to fuck her doggy style against the couch. When he goes at her too hard and hurts his cock, Marie’s remorse is only for her girl: “I’m sorry, I said again, and I put on my clothes. All I could think about was you, feverish, hurting, wanting me.” Another time, after a threesome with a fellow waiter and his brother that kept her up all night, she returns home to shower and take a morning-after pill and call her daughter who’s getting up for school. “I hear her high-pitched voice say Hi Mama and I hear her crunching toast. I ask her what kind of jelly she’s having today.” During one of the rare days when Marie has her daughter with her, Marie brands her neck with a fondue skewer while her daughter watches re-runs of The Cosby Show, waiting for the laugh track to cover the sound of her burning skin. “You ask to touch it and you are fascinated by how the blister feels full but fragile. You say it’s gross but you want to do it again. You are skeptical. You say I should go to the doctor. You say What kind of bug would do that?”

The things that Marie does are gross, and the fact that she keeps doing them makes them more disturbing still. The inability of Marie to process the young life she’s expected to manage is summed up coarsely midway through the book when her four year-old — an early reader — is helping Marie memorize the different cow parts she needs to know for work. “You have a lisp and I tell you to say brisket over and over just so I can hear it. But when you fall asleep I go into the bathroom and do lines off the map of the steer…. You are so warm but I can’t stop shivering. I feel a soaring bliss — I adore you — I feel a plummeting ugly resentment — I am a pile of shit falling endlessly down a dark shaft.”

Marie is preternaturally gifted at her job, so collected and imperturbable, she’s often put on private room duty to man the escapades of show-off high rollers, thirty men or more. In her free time, she drops off work clothes to be starched and rehearses the ingredients in the chef’s hoisin sauce leading some of her colleagues to wonder, why can’t she nail down the mother thing if she’s so good at this? Why is she shirking her most important job?

“I don’t know what to give her,” she answers to the restaurant’s top grossing waiter and her favorite lover, Cal, when he asks why her daughter isn’t with her. Cal calls bullshit, saying you give “as much as you can”, with love and attention to start. “I want to do it right,” Marie says. “Not much as I can, just right.”

But Love Me Back dares to question what “right” looks like. In a three month time span, Marie fucked (fucked, not slept with) over thirty men who either work at or patronized the steakhouse, and snorted her weight’s worth in coke, but when she’s at her job, she’s “golden” — a currency that’s melted down to pay for her daughter’s after-school care and health insurance, with a third leftover for the child’s dad. On alternate weekends, her daughter gets dropped off at The Restaurant to enjoy a Shirley Temple before going home to her mother’s clean apartment, where Marie is so consumed by love for this creature she’s created, she cuts initials into her skin and presses hot iron to her flesh while her daughter watches TV. Not since Isabelle Hupert in The Piano Teacher have we encountered a woman so incapable of bearing the weight of being loved.

If we can wish one thing for Marie and her creator, Merritt Tierce, it’s that this book will put the term “unlikeable character” to rest. I didn’t like this bone-worked, maddening, cavernous mother, I loved her all the way to her rotted core, and rooted for her — still root for — this modern woman doing the worst version of her best.

REVIEW: Our Love Will Go the Way of the Salmon by Cameron Pierce

Cameron Pierce’s Our Love Will Go the Way of the Salmon is an assortment of fish stories — big lies and tall tales. The collection certainly questions both fiction’s purpose and its allure. Pierce’s Our Love features fish in a variety of contexts. In some stories, the fish are main characters; in others, the fish are merely setting or background detail. Though the collection could benefit from a stronger sense of connection between the tales, Our Love reminds us of man’s primal drive for dominance and sport.

Pierce’s characters are risk-takers. Some, like the couple on the run in “Let Love In,” are willing to give up security in favor of achieving a big break. Fishing (or trying to obtain fish) serves as a point of connection for many of the characters — often binding children to their parents well into adulthood. This is a device used by Pierce to raise questions of mortality, and to ground his characters through the act of killing, whether it be for sport or food. Collectively, Pierce’s stories can be taken as an example of the many ways we try to distract ourselves with diversions, how we use shared experience and hobbies to help us relate to each other.

We first see the generational connection in the title story. A grandson takes his wheelchair-bound grandmother fishing, reliving memories of their fishing trips from the past. Together, they reel in the biggest fish they’ve ever caught:

“Come on out, you bastard!”she shouted, muscling a trout toward the shore with her frail arms. That was Grandma. Crippled and blind, but totally mad for fish. My very own Captain Ahab.”

The fish on the line drags them into the water, lifting Grandma from her chair. When the story ends, her grandson looks back to the dock and sees that Grandma is missing. The big fish both brings them together and is the reason for their separation. Pierce returns several times to the idea of storytelling, which pairs nicely with the theme of fishing, and is a way for him to explore the archetypal struggle of man vs. beast. Use of the motif of fishing raises questions about death, risk, and lying. Fishing becomes a more trivial way to resolve man’s need to capture and kill, as it isn’t barbarous enough that most people find it objectionable.

“We didn’t understand the chasms that could open up inside a man and swallow him whole and unless you were there in that jungle yourself, you may never understand the particular chasm we faced. So when people like you ask me what it was like, I try not to let my feelings known. And I sure as hell never tell them the story of the best man I ever knew. But I’m gonna tell you now, because sometimes the lie gets old.”

Characters in Our Love are constantly pondering their own existence. In “The Bass Fisherman’s Wife,” a speculative and humorous examination of the seductive draw of fisherman to fish, Pierce writes of a man who loves his wife without hesitation, saying, “For sixteen years they’d lived as man and wife. Could they live as man and bass?” Without giving the end away, “The Bass” includes a delightful transformational element reminiscent of Aimee Bender’s work. Yet for several other stories like it, Our Love loses its footing. Tales without the strong emotional resonance of familial relationships feel less connected to a thematic ideal and more like they were selected for their literal relevance as stories of fish.

But with “Easiest Kites there are to Fly,” Pierce delivers what becomes his strongest emotional message. A man begins to hallucinate that he is seeing fish. A heightened emotional state following his father’s death brings this on.

“The man didn’t get it either. Another darkness had entered his life. At his daddy’s funeral, an unexpected visitor had showed. That unspeakable fish they caught years before hovered above his daddy’s coffin. Nobody else noticed or acknowledged, but the man, he wept in fear. His wife squeezed his hand and wept harder herself. People around him issued little nods as if to say, ‘We feel you, son. We feel your pain.’When the fish lowered itself onto the coffin, sliming the lacquered lid, the man could no longer contain himself. He cried out, ‘Go away.’

“People thought he spoke of pain and death. Go away, pain. Go away, death. But the man had no beef with pain or death. No move could ever be made in life without inflicting hurt on someone or something else.”

Here, as in many of the other stories, Pierce pushes characters into difficult situations in order to explore their pain.This is when he does his best work. Where for some, fishing is a means of escape, for others it represents madness and obsession.His collection is given weight by this idea of balance — equal and opposite actions — for every time one person advances, another is left behind.

Fish stories and memories haunt these characters’ lives and many are unable to escapetheir own fears and base drives. Pierce’s characters tell stories that are not to be believed. Our Love Will Go the Way of the Salmon challenges our understanding of why we seek out opportunities to kill for sport. Does it say something about us that we bond while hunting lesser animals? For Pierce, fishing is both calming hobby and barbarous obsession. His characters are caught somewhere in between.

Sunday Sundries: Literary Links from Around the Web (Dec. 21st)

Looking for some Sunday reading? Here are some literary links from around the web that you might have missed:

President Obama says he is “in the middle of a wonderful book that was recently released called Redeployment, by Phil Klay.” (Redeployment made our list of the 25 best collections of 2014.)

There was a dust-up over the onerous The Toast writer contracts this week.

Flavorwire wonders what Amazon’s bestsellers say about American culture in 2014.

Speaking of Amazon, they pulled a book recently because the author used too many hyphens.

Paul Muldoon takes a look at the letters and poems of Samuel Beckett.

If you love tiny books, here’s the most amazing library you will ever see.

There’s a new Kelly Link story online at McSweeney’s!

James Patterson makes good on his promise to donate 1 million to indie bookstores.

George R. R. Martin gets furious at Sony for canceling The Interview after North Korean threats.

The Guardian looks at the best cups of tea in literature (yes, the Mad Hatter’s tea party is listed).

Nell Zink talks to The Paris Review about living off of writing.

Justin Taylor looks at William H. Gass’s On Being Blue.

The Rumpus argues that rejection is wonderful for writers.

Making Poetic Sport of the Wounded

by Ravi Mangla

don-delillo-end-zone-197x300

When asked for my favorite Don DeLillo novel (a question that has yet to manifest in the natural course of conversation), I invariably respond with End Zone. A deep cut from the DeLillo library, the book is markedly different than its predecessor (the oft-brilliant Americana): slimmer, sharper, more disciplined, and leavened with his peculiar brand of gallows humor. The themes that come to dominate his later works — namely, a preoccupation with nuclear armament and its apocalyptic consequences — first take root in End Zone. It wouldn’t be a stretch to call it the Great American Football Novel, as so little competition exists (unless we’re counting Matt Christopher titles). The lack of literary interest in the game is surprising, since it serves as the perfect lens through which to examine our fractured state: its ingrained prejudices, gender distortions, money lust, and, above all, the culture of brute violence that has come under increased scrutiny of late.

The lack of literary interest in the game is surprising, since it serves as the perfect lens through which to examine our fractured state: its ingrained prejudices, gender distortions, money lust, and, above all, the culture of brute violence that has come under increased scrutiny of late.

My own love affair with football started early, around seven or eight. I had a shrine dedicated to the Miami Dolphins in the corner of my bedroom, with ephemera ranging from felt pennants to signed photos of my favorite players. I never missed a game on television. Losses reduced me to inconsolable fits of angst and suffering. Sundays passed with trepidation in my household. Bad news meant a storm, and my parents had to be prepared to batten down the hatches.

This zealous fandom continued for the next decade or so. I traveled to Florida to watch their training camp, attended conventions, managed fantasy teams, and even started a football blog (everything short of a porpoise tattoo). It wasn’t until the Richie Incognito bullying scandal that my passion for the game began to level off. Reading Incognito’s racist and homophobic messages to teammate Jonathan Martin opened my eyes to the gladiatorial mentality and language of violence cultivated in NFL locker rooms. Instead of denouncing the actions of Incognito, players vilified Martin for reporting the abuses and seeking emotional support. When Dolphins General Manager Jeff Ireland was notified of the ongoing harassment, he advised Martin to punch Incognito in the face. Because apparently that’s what real men do.

This newfound disillusionment with the game was only compounded by SportsCenter’s daily screenings of Jadeveon Clowney’s thundering tackle on Michigan running back Vincent Smith, which earned Clowney an ESPY award and instant celebrity (the YouTube video of the tackle has logged over five million views). My last iota of interest in the sport was atomized following the Ray Rice assault charges and the NFL’s abysmal attempt to sweep the incriminating evidence under the rug. Mind you, this is not a new tactic in the NFL playbook. Former Bears GM Jerry Angelo recently admitted to concealing “hundreds and hundreds” of abuse cases during his tenure with the team. For many executives, the decision of whether to report a violent crime is less a moral concern than a monetary one.

Against-Football-210x300

In August, Steve Almond released Against Football: One Fan’s Reluctant Manifesto. The book documents Almond’s own disenchantment with the game and its malignant influence on our culture. An extended chapter is dedicated to the prevalence of brain injuries among former players and the dubious ethics of watching athletes incur repeated blows to the head. Almond offers several prospective changes to curb the most dangerous aspects of the sport, including legislation prohibiting players younger than sixteen from engaging in full contact and imposing a weight limit on participants. Recent studies estimate the average lifespan for an offensive lineman is 52 years, with one in three players experiencing cognitive problems at a significantly younger age than the average person. Combine that with an elevated rate of suicide and chronic pain from bone and ligament damage and you’ve got a veritable minefield of post-retirement health risks for players to navigate. Unfortunately this is not something likely to be remedied with a few simple tweaks to the rules. Physical pain is endemic to the sport and any changes implemented by the league are bound to be disappointingly small and entirely inadequate.

It would be naive for me to claim that watching football inures us to violence, as anyone can tell you there’s a seismic difference between televised violence and experiencing it firsthand. My issue is more with the symbolic qualities of the sport, its embodiment of all the injustices in this country, from corporate tax loopholes (the NFL is a tax-exempt organization) to the war on drugs (the league doles out harsher punishments for drug use than it does for domestic violence) to its history of institutional racism (even with the Rooney Rule, minority coaches and executives are routinely overlooked). The attitudes and practices of the league run so contrary to my personal politics that I can no longer in good conscience allow the sport my patronage.

The attitudes and practices of the league run so contrary to my personal politics that I can no longer in good conscience allow the sport my patronage.

The game came on and we all watched it, marveling at the pros, how easily they did the things we stumbled over. In slow motion the game’s violence became almost tender, a series of lovely and sensual assaults. The camera held on fallen men, on men about to be hit, on those who did the hitting. It was a loving relationship with just a trace of mockery; the camera lingered a big too long, making poetic sport of the wounded. We laughed at the most acrobatic spills and the hardest tackles and at the meanness of some of it, the gang tackles and cheap shots. We laughed especially at the meanness.

Perhaps more than any other sports novel End Zone captures the self-conscious machismo and hyper-militarized speak of the locker room environment (“They’re out to get us. They’ll bleach our skulls with hydrosulfite.” “They’ll rip off our clothes and piss on our bare feet.”) In the heat of West Texas, toughness is valued above all else. Cecil Rector’s dislocated shoulder is corrected with a crude harness. Ron Steeples is knocked out cold and later shepherded back into the game. Jimmy Fife is teased over a ruptured spleen. The tolerance of physical pain is akin to religious rite. Injuries are worn like badges of honor. Players are lured to the program by the promise of pain and sacrifice. Even Gary Harkness, the story’s protagonist, searches for meaning in the game, a reigning sense of order. They believe by surrendering themselves to a collective identity they can be absolved of fear and uncertainty. By uniting toward a common goal they can rise above their individual limitations. Fans of the game seek a similar salve, a means to transcend the mundanities of their day. But like the dizzying hits that are slowly grinding brains into a grayish pulp, I fear how our continued consumption will wear on our own minds.