A Crash Course in Diversifying Your Bookshelf

I n the past year, I’ve made a conscious and intentional effort to read in an inclusive and representative way. For me this means reading perspectives that differ from mine, about experiences that are new to me, and learning from people who have lived in ways that offer precious teachings. It also means reading nonfiction and fiction in equal measure. Consuming the news and nonfiction about important but heavy topics can be emotionally draining; whereas poetry and comics can uplift us when we feel weltshmerz or despair.

This is why I’ve put together a list of books by writers, poets, and artists from a range of backgrounds. When read in the order presented, it creates a narrative arc of its own. The list builds from a slow crescendo of more accessible books to heavy-hitters that draw on academic and historical research, finishing with a few books that unearth the kinds of futures we want to create.

These titles will humble you and fill you with wonder. But most important, they will hopefully also inspire you to create your own stories in ways that are most representative of your experiences.

So You Want to Talk about Race by Ijeoma Oluo

If you are a white person, this is essential reading before engaging any racialized or marginalized person in a conversation about race and racism. If you are a person of color, you may find new ways of understanding other racialized people, while also feeling a sense of validation in realizing that your experiences of racism are shared by many others.

I started following Oluo on Twitter last year when I realized that my social media feed was not very representative of my values or the types of thinkers I wanted to learn from. I am always learning so much from her articles and pithy tweets. This book is the epitome of her compassionate yet disciplined teachings on how we can all learn to think, talk, and act in anti-racist ways.

She of the Mountains by Vivek Shraya

In this beautifully illustrated novel, Vivek Shraya gracefully braids two stories together to ponder issues of sexual, gender, and racial identity and to re-imagine the Hindu myth of the elephant god Ganesha.

I immediately felt connected to this book because of the evocative way Shraya portrays how to love oneself as we grow up and into our bodies and minds.

Shraya is also a multi-talented creator who is also a visual artist, poet, musician, and associate professor of creative writing at the University of Calgary. I had a hard time selecting which of her writing to include—her collection of poetry “even this page is white” was also one of my favorite poetry collections on identities and self.

Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race by Reni Eddo-Lodge

Eddo-Lodge’s book has such a brilliant title based on a viral blog post of the same name. I think most people of color can relate to the feeling of not wanting to talk to white people about race at some point in their lives. So steep a cup of tea and sink into Eddo-Lodge’s book to immerse yourself in the historical and current issues of anti-blackness and racism in the motherland of colonialism.

Both Canada and the U.S. can thank Britain and other European countries for the origins of our institutional racism, so it only makes sense for those of us living in these countries to learn about one of the birthplaces of white supremacy.

How Does a Single Blade of Grass Thank the Sun? by Doretta Lau

I grew up mostly in Alberta (the so-called “Texas of Canada”) and then lived in Montreal, Quebec for university before moving to Vancouver, British Columbia in my early 20s.

Once I arrived in B.C., I realized I had never before seen, befriended, or interacted with so many other Asians in Canada. I felt a sense of belonging I had never experienced in Alberta or Montreal. Unfortunately, this was also the time that anti-Asian sentiment started rising in Vancouver.

This slim volume contains short stories that portray the struggles and pleasures of the North American Asian experience in a fresh and dynamic way.

The Solidarity Struggle edited by Mia McKenzie

As I read more books that represented different identities and bore witness to the many ways people are racialized and marginalized, I realized that I did not have a working definition of what meaningful solidarity looked like. How could I, with all of my privileges, even begin to act in solidarity?

The Solidarity Struggle helped me start the conversation with myself. It contains essays and comics by a variety of Canadian and U.S. writers/artists that will get you thinking about what meaningful solidarity looks like for you.

A Place Called No Homeland by Kai Cheng Thom

Kai Cheng Thom and I attended the same university in Montreal and I loved reading her weekly column in the McGill Daily, where I worked as an illustrations editor and contributor.

Thom writes about her identity as a Chinese trans woman in a transphobic world in a way that cuts straight to the heart. This collection of poems by this young Chinese-Canadian literary genius is refreshing, intimate, and unapologetically proud.

The Right to Be Cold: One Woman’s Story of Protecting Her Culture, the Arctic, and the Whole Planet by Sheila Watt-Cloutier

I lived and worked in Iqaluit, Nunavut during my masters degree in public health. During my brief time in the Canadian Arctic, I learned as a qablunaaq from “down south,” about the many Inuit environmental activists protecting their land and animals from the devastating impacts of human-made climate change.

We hear a lot about Greenpeace and other non-Inuit organizations in Canada and the U.S., but those narratives often erases the decades of activism and the current efforts of Inuit people, especially the women, in protecting their native land from exploitation and degradation.

Watt-Cloutier’s memoir recounts her life story as a proud Inuk woman to provide a compelling argument for the importance of protecting the Arctic, not just for the animals, but the strong people that call the ice and tundra home.

American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang

This classic graphic novel provides a nice break from all the text-heavy volumes in the first half of this list. Part of representation and inclusivity is to recognize that everyone learns differently and that some of us may find images more compelling.

Gene depicts the complexities of growing up Asian in predominantly white spaces by integrating the famous Chinese myth of Sun WuKung, the Monkey King. There is also a very poignant telling of the “gross lunch” story that most Asian kids can relate to. I have many sad memories of tossing away a delicious Chinese lunch lovingly prepared by my mother in an attempt to belong in the White Albertan cafeterias; I didn’t realize at the time that I was also tossing away a tiny bit of my sense of self in the process.

Mixed Race Amnesia by Minelle Mahtani

How do mixed race, biracial, or multiracial people feel about these identities and what (if anything) does it mean for them?

Dr. Mahtani interviewed mixed race women in Toronto to center their experiences and to critically discuss how their narratives fit into Canadian and international assumptions around the so-called “post-racial future.”

Salt by Nayyirah Waheed

Life is tough, and some days we need a poem to help pick us up again.

Waheed’s first collection does just that. Simple, short, and poignant, her poetry is an arrow that strikes straight and true. I often go back to this book in between dense chapters in the other nonfiction books on this list. Reading about race and racism can make us sad, make us angry, and often trigger traumatic memories.

Poetry is healing, so take a swig of this bittersweet medicine.

Policing Black Lives: State Violence in Canada from Slavery to Present by Robyn Maynard

If by this point you decide that you’re ready for the full truth and nothing but the truth, dive into Maynard’s detailed historical account of how anti-Blackness is pervasive in most parts of Canada’s institutions.

Canada often sells itself as a beacon of multiculturalism and diversity, and although in ways it is more tolerant than the United States, we can’t ignore the incredible exclusionary and violently racist policies that mark our history and our politics today.

By obscuring our racism behind a neo-liberal veil of tolerance, we are not confronting our own discriminatory policies in a settler-colonial nation that has said historically said “fuck you” more often than “thank you.”

Indian Horse by Richard Wagamese

Even though I moved to Canada as a young child, I did not learn about the horrifically shameful history of the Indian residential schools until I was an adult. Even then a lot of the stories are sugar-coated in white icing, erasing the intergenerational traumas that continue today as a result of the atrocities carried out by Christian institutions and their leaders.

Wagamese’s novel depicts the tragedies of residential schools (although they were more like child labor camps than schools) in the 1960s to ‘70s through the life of Saul Indian Horse, a young First Nations boy who escapes the horrors of the school through his passion for hockey.

This chillingly beautiful book has also been adapted into a movie of the same name.

Running with the Mind of Meditation: Lessons for Training Body and Mind by Sakyong Mipham

And now for something completely different.

Although many of the writers included talk about race, racism, immigration, and other political issues, I bet at least some of them would also like to write about all the other parts of their identities. I like to run and bike, but I rarely see or hear about famous recreational runners or cyclists of color.

Mipham’s musings on running meditation are a reminder that we have to take care of our bodies and minds to recharge, not just so we can be a better advocate and activist for the causes we care about, but because our bodies give us so much on a daily basis and are intrinsically worth caring for.

The Three Body Problem trilogy by Liu Cixin

I wanted to end this playlist with books that look at how to shape humanity’s future.

We know that our past and present are full of racism, violence, and powerful resistance, but what will our world look like in 10 years, 100 years, 1000 years?

Cixin’s delightful and expansive trilogy centers people of color such as Latinx, Chinese, and Australian Aboriginal characters rarely seen in mainstream science fiction. It also respectfully challenges our ideas of masculinity and gender expression in ways that I have never seen in American science fiction while portraying Asian women as prominent scientists and thinkers.

Afrofuturism: the World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture by Ytasha Womack

When it comes to Black and Indigenous people, the very act of surviving is an act of resistance. Imagine a future where Black and Brown people are not only surviving, but thriving and telling our own stories.

Afrofuturism is an artistic movement spanning various areas of the creative spectrum, such as film, music, and the literary and visual arts to imagine Black people in our futures. Womack takes us through the history of the movement from legends such as Sun Ra, Parliament, and Erykah Badu to contemporary innovators like Andre 3000, Missy Elliot, and Janelle Monae.

Afrofuturism reads as the ultimate list of who to watch and listen to as we join together to imagine a future that is inclusive and representative.

Terese Mailhot on How to Talk to Men, Children, and White People

I read Terese Marie Mailhot’s memoir Heart Berries once, then read it twice again. In her book, Mailhot explores the traumas of her life: her impoverished upbringing on the Seabird Island Reservation, the loss of her eldest son in a custody battle, her fractured relationship with her future husband. When the author is hospitalized with a dual diagnosis of PTSD and bipolar II, she requests a notebook as a condition of treatment, and begins writing herself back to health. Mailhot and I spoke last week about the kinds of colonization she’s experienced in her writing career and life in general: what men take from women, what white society expects from other cultures, and why writers devour the insights of others.


Deirdre Sugiuchi: You describe Salish stories, stories told by speakers of the Salish tribes, as being sparse and interested in blank space. Can you describe how this is reflected in your art?

Terese Mailhot: Language is extremely important to us. Every word counts and cannot be convoluted. There’s a lot of power in trying to illustrate the truth of something. I had to render it in a really simple way.

DS: I’m obsessed with process, especially in regards to clarity. Do you have any specific methods to achieve clear prose?

Image result for heart berries by terese marie mailhot

TM: People think I’m experimental. I don’t really like that word. It’s really high-brow compared to what I do, which is strip all of the things that seem like unnecessary contrivance or bravado.

DS: You write from the perspective of a Native writer, but you also address the dominant culture. Can you discuss writing with this double consciousness?

TM: With the essay Indian Sick, I’m writing first to (my husband) Casey. It starts with desperation. Casey is a white man and was raised with some sense of normalcy. That whole essay is trying to navigate and impart the truth of my story to this man who can’t ever fully know the disparities between my circumstances — those of an Indian woman — and his. That letter became about something larger than Casey by the end. By the end it became about my father. I think in the beginning it was really important to bring Casey in and the only way I could do that was by explaining what he couldn’t understand.

I could not look at being Indian; I had to look through it.

It’s the one occasion I felt conflicted about using the second person and speaking to Casey, and a lot of that is the culture of me and everything that signifies why I feel so deeply about my world and the history of genocide that we are dealing with. I think that conflict is present there on the line level, but when I was writing the book, I had to place myself at the center of the story. I could not look at being Indian; I had to look through it.

The audience should always be with me and should never feel like I’m withholding my heart from them, but sometimes I’m not giving them the thing that maybe they expect. A lot of that was the resistance to an MFA aesthetic, a white MFA aesthetic of show don’t tell. There’s a lot of telling in the book.

DS: I never could do an MFA for that reason.

TM: Most are operating within a system of competition, of things that feel so anti-art, so degrading sometimes. They kind of shape you artistically into something that most of the time you are not, especially for people writing outside of old-establishment aesthetics.

DS: Several years ago I read this paper by Sandra Bloom called Bridging the Black Hole of Trauma: The Evolutionary Significance of the Arts which, among other things, addresses the ceremony of creating art in Native American culture. You are clear that your practice of ceremony differs from the tradition with which you were raised, but can you discuss how you use your writing practice as a healing ceremony?

I was less sick when I started purging the truth of what happened to me on the page.

TM: I think the book itself is like an incantation. There are aspects, especially in the latter part of the book, that feel like a spell that conjures my mother. When I read it out loud, especially the passages about my mother, it feels sacred and it feels powerful, and something happened when I started writing that made me feel like a human being and made me feel better about her.

I was able to write the explicit truths of what happened to me. I can’t even speak it, but I can write it. When I start reading the passages about how I was able to say one word “father,” then I was able to say two words, that was literal. I was learning the language of how my father hurt me. There was something about the physical act of writing that made it less visceral. I was less sick when I started purging the truth of what happened to me on the page. I became physically less anemic and I was more able to function in the world.

I think everyone should have that thing that illustrates the nature of themselves in a physical way.

DS: One of the themes in the book was you taking from men, conditioning them, and them taking from you. That list at the end, where you detail how you took back when you were hurt by men, was incredible.

TM: I didn’t know that was going to come. I knew I wanted to write about these things that had happened but I didn’t want to give those men characterization and their own pages. I didn’t want to illustrate all the bad interactions I’ve had with men, just to assert that men had maltreated me and my body and my spirit and my intellect. I listed them, and the way they hurt me, and how I reacted, and doing that without shame was important for me. Making it matter-of-fact was necessary.

DS: You begin by talking about taking from men, but at the end you realize that you have given away too much. Can you discuss how this is reflected in the culture at large, be it on the tribal or social level?

TM: I think straight women sometimes have to negotiate with themselves, asking, is this the best of all possible worlds with men? We’re mistreated so often and victimized so often that sometimes we put up with things we shouldn’t.

It was important to say I was put in a place of exploitation, where I was subjugated and objectified for my body, and then I just fought against that as much as I could, working within that system. I feel like that’s important for a lot of native women to hear: if you want something, to get it from the world however you want it, and I hope and pray that they find true independence from men, not that they are the worst people. There is something so profound in being able to buy yourself dinner and not having to rely on someone.

DS: Your grandmother was a crucial early figure in your life. She attended a reservation school where “parasites and nuns and priests contaminated generations of our people.” Can you discuss the impact of your grandmother going to the reservation school on your family and your culture?

I feel like resilience ascribes this value to certain types of survival that don’t interest me.

TM: Residential school has stripped many indigenous communities of their languages and communal practices and it’s difficult to talk about it because residential schools were mostly led by Christian missionaries and priests, so that has also infected the way we view ourselves as human beings. One thing Christianity gave people was shame. It’s not as if we didn’t have shame before colonization, it’s that shame operated differently. You didn’t need to be contrite. You had to be knowledgeable about the self and there is a distinction. My grandmother had to learn to survive in an environment that wanted to assimilate her into white life, white ways of knowledge and thinking and interacting with the world. After she attended residential school, she moved back to be with her people and she taught nursery and she helped kids. It felt tender to sit next to her and pray, but what wasn’t tender was that she cleaned maniacally. Everything had to be immaculate. The cleaner the environment, the closer you were to God. I would see her cleaning as if somebody was watching her and I remember distinctly thinking this is how she cleaned when the nuns were around.

She spent a long period in a tense environment like that where she was being monitored and shamed when she didn’t do the right thing, and I wonder what kind of grandmother she would have been outside of those parameters and experiences. There’s this thing of being beyond resilience. She was exceptional. I don’t know how I could have lived through what she lived through and have been so kind.

DS: In addition to exploring your childhood in your book, you also explore your relationship with your own children. You describe bonding with your son and nurturing your son even though you did not always have a nurturing relationship with your own mother. You say, “Children can be teachers too.” I know that having my own son impacted me and my connection to my work. How do you think your sons have influenced your art?

TM: They’re just better people than we are. Children are just better. Their job is to push you around and test you, and if you raise your voice, you’ve lost and they know that you’ve lost. When I had Isaiah I was dealing with postpartum depression, and I had subpar healthcare, and I was on my own, and I had just lost my first son. I found myself uncontrollably sad, and I needed help. There wasn’t any. So, I prayed for patience to hold my son, and look at him in the eyes, and not see the son who wasn’t there — or how they looked so much alike. I had to pray for the strength to do it alone. Once I started throwing myself into putting Isaiah first, everything fell into place, and I was able to love without fear. I stopped being scared I wasn’t good enough to be a mother.

I had to learn to love somebody when I felt like I was nothing. I was broke, and loving him wholly without considering losing him, it taught me something about love. He opened my heart in a way that nobody else could have. Nobody else could have made me so tender and human. Him needing me made me a better person. I feel like children do that to us if we answer the call. I feel like when you answer that call, you see how good the world can be.

DS: You discuss resilience in your book, particularly white attitudes about resilience. You say “It’s an Indian condition to be proud of survival but reluctant to call it resilience.”

TM: I don’t like the term. I don’t want to be known for my ability to survive because it’s like they are asking you to get over it as they are calling you resilient. It’s like I’m here smiling but if you were there crying would they still call you resilient? No. But are you still a survivor? Yes.

I feel like resilience ascribes this value to certain types of survival that don’t interest me.

DS: Because it devalues the people who don’t make it?

TM: I’m suspicious of most words people use to define Native people. I feel like it’s really interesting to examine the words they are using.

I always hear the term raw used to describe work by people of color, or by a woman who’s been abused. I’m suspicious of how they are using the word, although I don’t mind the word because I think I try to cultivate art that appears vulnerable. Plus, the idea of resilience is the idea of recovering quickly from something. I feel like, my god, we’re still in the midst of it. We’re not even out of the storm that is colonization.

DS: I read your essay where you discuss decolonizing your narrative as a Native writer. It made me wonder what it would be like if non-colonized people were examined the mindset of colonization thoroughly and regularly, even in today’s world, which is considered “post-colonial.”

TM: I think it’s so weird because a lot of times during workshop, even when I do fellowships, and when I go to this really nice place where there’s a lot of young writers and there’s a lot of older writers who are trying to finish their books, sometimes I’ll have a cohort, a friend who writes about their experiences and they come from a different culture, like Korea or India, and immediately the whole room, even the POC writers, will sometimes be like, “Wow you gave me some insight into the world of x.” That’s not a writer’s job. Our job is to make art. Was it good on its own merit? That’s what’s important to talk about. That to me feels like decolonization because people want to colonize work. They want the insight. They want the experience of it. They want to devour it and own it. Later, when they talk they want to be able to say, “Oh let me tell you this fun fact about x culture. I just read this essay.” I feel like that is a very western thing, to want to colonize the insight gained from experience, and know it and own it and possess it and then impart it to other people as an authority. I think it’s important for people to understand that my work is supposed to connect you to me as a human being and I want to be treated so afterwards, you know? Not as a cultural artifact.

My Butch Lesbian Mom, Bruce Springsteen

When we say Bruce Springsteen is Dad Rock, what kind of father are we talking about? An average man made affable in retrospect? A bullseye for blame? A boss, a cop, a drill sergeant? Or better yet, a Daddy, suggestive of the erotic hidden behind the familial?

Though I know plenty of moms whose devotion to Bruce runs fiercer than any dad could know, there’s a reason why we think of Springsteen as Dad Rock and not Mom Rock. The reason is that historically, over Springsteen’s nearly 50-year career, the dads have laid claim. In Springsteen, straight white dads of a certain age have seen their ultimate dad fantasy: in the words of Helena Fitzgerald, writing about Springsteen’s ultimate dadliness in Catapult, “All a dad has to do to be a hero is show up.” But my broke, queer generation has little compassion for the Boomer nonsense of better days, especially when their nostalgia renders them fonder of their own childhoods than their actual children’s futures.

That interpretation of Springsteen’s significance is reductive, hampered by both generational and gender barriers. Behind the assumption that his music speaks for the disaffected male, hard up and laid off, hides the assumption that class problems are either genderless or primarily a cis male concern — but queer Springsteen fans see through that lie. Maggie Nelson has written about the “many-gendered mothers of the heart,” a form of queer kinship that is both an intimacy and an identification. Springsteen has been our cis male Boomer dad for way too long. It’s time to consider the possibility that he might be our butch lesbian mom.

Springsteen has been our cis male Boomer dad for way too long. It’s time to consider the possibility that he might be our butch lesbian mom.

I am not the first to note Springsteen’s queer or even specifically lesbian appeal. If you are queer and the stereotypical Springsteen fan has always seemed to be the wrong side of Daddy to you, consider that tramps like us are especially born to run. He is not only for us, but also stands with us, and in a fashion, could even be one of us. The best male rock stars are barely, or many, gendered, and seldom straight: Prince, Bowie, Jagger. Consider Todd Haynes’ biopic of Bob Dylan, I’m Not There, where the most convincing and curious portrayal of the star belonged to Cate Blanchett. And yet, Bruce (a butcher name there never was) is harder to claim as ours. Even if he shared a hot kiss with saxophonist Clarence Clemons at every concert, even if he wrote a song for Donna Summer to protest the racism and homophobia of the anti-disco movement, even if he sang a song called “My Lover Man,” even if he admits in his memoir that his Born in the USA look of bandanas and muscles was “Christopher Street leather bar” gay, the ardent identification of the dads seems to disallow any other kind of desire for him. But in the same way you can know that you are gay before you know what it means, from a young age, I recognized Bruce Springsteen as the butch mother of my hungry heart.

When I look at Springsteen, I might think Daddy, but I think Mommi, too. In the same way his protest song “Born in the USA” has been misread as patriotic, his approach to masculinity has been misread as cis male, when it is in fact too performative to be anything but genderqueer. (I’m not saying that Bruce himself is genderqueer, to be clear, but his showmanship is.) Perhaps this is why I have never felt left out of his music because I identify as a queer woman — though I do feel left out of the fandom sometimes, in spite of my Central Jersey birthright, because I feel that the army of dads (and straight, white dads specifically) have claimed him so decisively. Much like Chris Christie on the beach, their fandom takes up all the space on what should be an abundant shoreline of possibility.

In the same way you can know that you are gay before you know what it means, from a young age, I recognized Bruce Springsteen as the butch mother of my hungry heart.

Crowning a cis, straight white male as a butch icon is admittedly giving them more than their share — must everything be about them? As Hilton Als rightly asks in his review of Springsteen on Broadway, is it even “possible for straight white men to empathize with anything other than themselves?” But there is a disarming, queer playfulness in the art of labeling straight men as lesbians in disguise. It’s a statement of protest that masculinity doesn’t belong to cis men. The Toast was once a great agora of declaring famous cis straight men as either lesbian icons, singers of lesbian anthems, or themselves just regular old lesbians. Mallory Ortberg, in particular, has kept this art alive. Over at BuzzFeed, Shannon Keating has recently identified Jack from Titanic as a role model for baby soft butches, and Grace Perry has examined the lesbian attraction to Harry Styles. But the fun isn’t limited to snatching straight men from the strictures of heterosexuality. After the death of George Michael, Deb Schwartz paid her respects to our butch queen in pearls, may he rest in freedom.

It takes a certain amount of queer clairvoyance to sense a lesbian vibe from an obvious non-lesbian. The heart of butchness, however, is sometimes more literally worn on its sleeve. Als notes that Springsteen’s “butch persona” allows him to reveal the smoke and mirrors behind the construct of masculinity. It also allows him a sense of empathy. As Walt Whitman wrote, “Agonies are one of my changes of garments / I do not ask the wounded person how he feels, I myself become the wounded person.” And as with that other American poet, masculinity in Springsteen is as much a costume as it is a work uniform. Butchness is a way of wearing masculinity that plays on revealing and concealing emotion, an emotional identification as much as a sartorial choice.

The butchness Springsteen wears covers up hurt and vulnerability like a soft t-shirt under a leather jacket.

The butchness Springsteen wears covers up hurt and vulnerability like a soft t-shirt under a leather jacket. Look at the cover of Darkness on the Edge of Town, the album that taught me not only how to dress, but how to stare. In his tight jeans, v-neck tee, and leather jacket, Bruce poses in front of a floral wallpaper, not a hot rod or a bike. Add to that messy wavy hair, biker boots, and a flannel unbuttoned a little too far, and I had my look down. Fortunately for me, each of those items I inherited from my mother, who loved menswear and told me there were no rules for how to dress. I was free to believe that what looked hot on him would look hot on me, too, free to shrug off the old confusion of wanting him versus wanting to be him. Depending on my mood, I was prepared to be a soft butch by day and a hard femme by night. All I needed was my girl. You better get it straight, darling.

When I listened to Springsteen in my adolescence, I didn’t switch the pronouns, and in turn learned something about the mutability of gender, the ease with which you could identify with the man singing or the woman to whom he sang, or even that there were more options than those two roles. There was possibility for me in these songs, a possibility of something that looked like equality for all expressions of gender, and permission that if I needed to feel like a gender different than the one I was told to take, I could. There is the possibility for those of us who do not identify as men to hear these songs about, allegedly, straight male desire and still see something of ours in them. I’ve been listening to “Thunder Road” my whole life, for example, but it never occured to me to identify with Mary. I was the aggressive one waiting with the car, making my butch plea to coax out my closeted femme crush to run away with me. The song is beloved because the stakes are dire yet the win feels assured. Growing up without the omnipotent cultural promise of a happy romantic ending afforded to straights, it was always hard to imagine what it would feel like to be promised a win. But perhaps in “Thunder Road,” their happy ending is only promised so long as queerness remains subtext.

Sometimes queer love only promises disappointment, late nights wondering whether it is better to speak when you know it will turn out badly. Consider “I’m on Fire,” a song which performs its gender roles to a T: “Hey little girl, is your Daddy home?” It’s a song of butch torment and “bad desire,” of messing around with a straight girl with a boyfriend and knowing your love is futile, even if it runs hotter than his. This bad desire lashes out until you let it out: “At night I wake up with the sheets soaking wet / and a freight train running through the middle of my head / Only you can cool my desire.” Here’s Sappho, in counterpoint: “You came and I was crazy for you / and you cooled my mind that burned with longing.” It is hard to imagine straight desire feeling this bad, but if anyone can convince me, it’s Bruce.

The butch/femme pair is a classic rock n’ roll dyad, with its shades of soft and stone. Unlike an imposed gender binary, the butch/femme pair inherits no violence and is based on adoration and complementarity rather than hierarchy. (The femme is just as much a take on femininity as butchness is to masculinity — it’s not a catchall term for women.) The pair has roots in the post-war, working-class lesbian bars that probably bore some bizzaro resemblance to the sort Bruce had to drag his dad out of, as he narrates in his memoir. In the novel Stone Butch Blues, Leslie Feinberg describes these bars as places of solace and rowdiness, safety and danger, considering the violent police raids to which such bars were always subject. When I first read Stone Butch Blues, it felt like a companion text to (or better, a dyke reboot of) Darkness on the Edge of Town or The River, insofar as it not only establishes queerness as a working class concern but it also traces the history of the queer struggle as concomitant with class struggle. Springsteen’s own fraught relation to masculinity is inseparable from the class-related concerns of labor and exhaustion that all genders share, but experience differently. The will to fight against the desperation to leave, the urgency of repressed pain breaking through, the drive for survival that runs hotter than hope — all the familiar themes are there.

In Stone Butch Blues, as in Springsteen’s music, intergenerational poverty and exploitation are the impediments to making it out alive, and in a body that feels like yours. The difference is, in the novel, the laid-off factory workers and union rabble rousers are not only cis, white, straight men. The protagonist, Jess, forges solidarity with the indigenous people of this country, with black civil rights crusaders, with sex workers, and perhaps with the greatest difficulty, with her own burgeoning queer community as she tries on new words to describe her relation to gender and desire. Springsteen gives voice to these communities, too, but the voice of the dads who sing along loudest tend to drown out the others. The butchness that Springsteen wears only becomes legible through the queer love and class struggle that a writer like Feinberg describes. It’s a toughness that gets forged by police beatings, pink slips, poverty, winter. A toughness that can protect love.

What Do Bruce Springsteen and Chance the Rapper Have in Common?

The stakes in a Springsteen song are nothing short of survival: “it ain’t no sin to be glad you’re alive.” But survival isn’t promised equally. Hanif Willis-Abdurraqib writes of going to The River tour after making a trip to Ferguson, Missouri, and observes that the future Springsteen calls for, celebratory and forgiving, is so often stolen from black youths. It is for this reason that I feel compelled to wrest Springsteen’s music from the tractor beam identification of the dads. They might be on their last chance power drive, but no one gets more chances than white men. The rest of us, and some more than others, are desperate for a future we can believe in, a future that looks like possibility, an open road leading to the horizon.

My actual mother is the one who taught me how to love Springsteen. Her stories of listening to his music when she was my age were different than my father’s, less rosy: stories of staying home and crying and listening to “Sandy” while her deadbeat boyfriend went to Point Pleasant for the Fourth of July without her. “Fuckin’ Bob,” she still shakes her head. We recently took each other to see Springsteen on Broadway as a Christmas present. Unsure of the dress code, I wore my biker boots, a leather skirt, and my Darkness on the Edge of Town t-shirt with the sleeves cut off. At one moment in his monologue, he listed local venues he had played with his first band, the Castilles, and mentioned Marlboro Psychiatric Hospital. In a stage whisper, my mother said to me, “Your grandmother was there.” My grandmother, who died too young when I was eight, likely never saw Springsteen, in the hospital or otherwise. But I could imagine her, an in-patient of grief and alcoholism and bad luck, unimpressed with the young man and his guitar and his will to live. For a moment, I smiled at the thought of three generations of us at Springsteen concerts, but it passed, for the many-gendered mothers of my heart are not much interested in nostalgia. Better to keep your eyes on the road, on the future, roll down the window and let the wind blow back your hair. Like Orpheus and Eurydice, let the men look back — let’s get lost instead. His music, taken to be anthemic of white male culture, expresses wisdom I’ve never learned from men. And because I did not so much interpret through a queer lens as I never knew any other way to think, his masculine burdens translated themselves into my butch virtues.

Springsteen’s music, taken to be anthemic of white male culture, expresses wisdom I’ve never learned from men. His masculine burdens translated themselves into my butch virtues.

Towards the end of Stone Butch Blues, Jess finds a kindred spirit in her trans woman neighbor, Ruth. It’s unclear whether or not their relationship will be sexual, but there is love between them, and desire, too, the kind Springsteen promises will greet you when you’ve honed your roughness into readiness. They discuss Ruth’s painting of the sky: “It’s not going to be day or night, Jess, It’s always going to be that moment of infinite possibility that connects them.” To me, this is the darkness on the edge of town, where the line between desperation and hope are obscured. Maybe it’s always been easy for me to queer Springsteen songs because, as with queer culture, his yearning to make it seems so impossible, and yet just on the horizon. Queer theorist José Muñoz writes that “we may never touch queerness, but we can feel it as the warm illumination of a horizon imbued with possibility.” The “we” he proposes is a community of those for whom the here and now isn’t enough, who believe in a promised land but know that that belief is hard won and hard kept, for the bad desire is just on the edge of the possible and survival isn’t promised. My personal Springsteen anthem is “The Promised Land,” queer for me every time I sing along: “Mister, I ain’t a boy, no, I’m a man, and I believe in the promised land.” (Not to mention the drama, my god: “Take a knife and cut this pain from my heart!”)

You can argue that these themes are universal. Everybody’s got a hungry heart, after all, even those who are never taught that their desires are bad. But saying that art speaks to everybody can easily erase particulars and lose its bite in the urge to universalize. Springsteen might be the one true daddy, but Daddy doesn’t mean the same thing to everybody. And anyway, the toughness he preaches reminds me more of my mother and grandmother—tougher than the rest, sure, but a toughness that is only the leather exterior of vulnerability.

The Patron Saint of Healers, Whores & Righteous Thieves

“Elegy to Gabrielle”

by Kelly Barnhill

Curator’s note: The following pages were found in a cave on an islet eleven miles southwest of Barbados. The narrative is, of course, incomplete, disjointed, and unreliable, as is the information contained within its pages. There is no record of Brother Marcel Renau living in the Monastery of the Holy Veil during the years in question. There is a record of the order for the execution of a Gabrielle Belain in St. Pierre in 1698; however, no documentation of the actual execution exists. Some of this narrative is indecipherable. Some is lost forever. Most, if not all, is blatantly untrue, the ravings of a lost sailor gone mad without water. As to the conditions in which these writings were found: this too remains a puzzle. The cave was dry and protected and utterly empty except for three things: a human skeleton, curled in the corner as though sleeping; a two-foot length of human hair, braided tightly with a length of ribbon and a length of rope, laid across the hands of the dead man; and an oiled and locked box made of teak, in which these documents were found. Across the lid of the box the following words had been roughly scratched into the wood, as though with a crude knife or a sharp rock: “Bonsoir, Papa.”

Two days before Gabrielle Belain (the pirate, the witch, the revolutionary) was to be executed, a red bird flew low over the fish market, startling four mules, ten chickens, countless matrons, and the Lord High Constable. It flew in a wide spiral higher and higher until it reached the window of the tower where my beloved Gabrielle awaited her fate. People say that she came to the window, that the shadows from the bars cut across her lovely face. People say that she reached out a delicate, slightly freckled hand to the bird’s mouth. People say that she began to sing.

I stood in the hallway with the two guards, negotiating the transfer of food, water, and absolution across the threshold of the wood and iron door that blocked Gabrielle from the world. I did not see the bird. I did not hear song. But I believe them both to be real. This is the nature of existence: We believe, and it is. Perhaps God will turn His back on me for writing such heresy, but I swear it’s the truth. Gabrielle, like her mother before her, was a Saint Among Men, a living manifestation of the power of God. People believed it, therefore it was true, and no demonstration of the cynical power of bureaucrats and governments and states could unbelieve their believing.

Gabrielle Belain, at the age of ten, walked from the cottage where she lived with her mother past the Pleasure House to the shore. The moon, a thin slash on a glittering sky, cast a pale light on the foamy sand. She peered out onto the water. The ship, hidden in darkness, was still there, its black sails furled and lashed to the tethered boom, its tarred hull creaking in the waves. She could feel it. Actually, there was never a time when she could not feel it. Even when it was as far away as Portugal or Easter Island or the far tip of the continent, she knew where the ship was. And she knew she belonged to it.

Four porpoises bobbed in the waves, waiting for the child to wade in. They made no sound, but watched, their black eyes flashing over the bubbling surf. A mongrel dog, nearly as tall as the girl, whined piteously and rubbed its nose to her shoulder.

“You can’t come,” she said.

The dog growled in response.

Gabrielle shrugged. “Fine,” she said. “Please yourself. I won’t wait for you.” She waded in, caught hold of a porpoise fin, and swam out into the darkness, the dog paddling and sputtering behind her.

The sailors on the quiet ship watched the sky, listened to the wind. They waited. They had been waiting for ten years.

By the time Gabrielle was thirteen, she was the ship’s navigator. By the time she was fifteen, she was captain, and a scourge to princes and merchants and slave traders. By the time she was eighteen, she was in prison — chained, starved, and measured and weighed for hanging.

At night, I see their hands. I do not see their faces. I pray, with my rattling breath, with the slow ooze of my blistered skin, with my vanishing, worthless life, that I may see their faces again before I die. For now, I must content myself with hands. The hands of Gabrielle, who thwarted governors, generals, and even the king himself, and the hands of her mother, who healed, who prayed, and God help me, who loved me. Once. But oh! Once!

Gabrielle’s mother, Marguerite Belain, came from France to Martinique in the cover and care of my order as we sailed across the ocean to establish a new fortress of prayer and learning in the lush, fragrant islands of the New World. It was not our intention to harbor a fugitive, let alone a female fugitive. We learned of Marguerite’s detention through our contacts with the Sisters of the Seventh Sorrow, several of whom waited upon the new and most beloved lover of the young and guileless king. Although the mistress had managed to bear children in her previous marriage, with the king she was weak-wombed, and her babes flowed, purple and shrunken, into her monthly rags with much weeping and sorrow in the royal chambers. Marguerite was summoned to the bed of the mistress, her womb now quickening once again.

“Please,” the mistress begged, tears flowing down those alabaster cheeks. “Please,” she said, her marble mouth, carved always in an expression of supercilious disdain, now trembling, cracking, breaking to bits.

Marguerite laid her hands on the belly of the king’s beloved. She saw the child, its limbs curled tightly in its liquid world. The womb, she knew, would not hold. She saw, however, that it could, that the path to wholeness was clear, and that the child could be born, saved, if certain steps were taken immediately.

But that was not all she saw.

She also saw the child, its grasping hands, its cold, cold eye. She saw the child as it grew in the seat of authority and money and military might. She saw the youth who would set his teeth upon the quivering world and tear upon its beating heart. She saw a man who would bring men to their knees, who would stand upon the throats of women, whose hunger for power would never cease.

“I cannot save this child,” Marguerite said, her leaf green eyes averted to the ground.

“You can,” the mistress said, her granite lips remaking themselves. “And you will.”

But Marguerite would not, and she was duly imprisoned for the duration of the pregnancy, until upon the birth she would be guillotined as a murderess if the child did not live and as a charlatan if it did.

It did not. But it did not matter: Marguerite had been spirited away, disguised in our habit and smuggled onto our ship of seafaring brethren before the palace ever did turn black with mourning.

I helped her escape, my Brothers and I. I placed our rough robes over those blessed shoulders, and helped her to wind her hair into the darkness of the cowl. I pulled it low over her face, hiding her from the world, and took her hand as we hurried through the city’s underground corridors, never stopping until we made it to the harbor, and hid her in an empty wine barrel on our ship. I told myself that the thudding of my heart was due to the urgency of our action. I told myself that the hand that I held in my hand was beloved because we are all beloved by God. To be human is to lie, after all. Our minds tell lies to our hearts and our hearts tell lies to our souls.

It was on the eighteenth day of our voyage that Marguerite gave me leave into her chamber. It was unasked for and yet longed for all the same, and came to me the way any miracle occurs — in a moment of astonishment and deep joy. On that same day — indeed, that same moment — a storm swirled from nowhere, sending the wind and sea to hurl themselves against the groaning hull, and striking the starboard deck with lightning.

Was it the feeble lover, I wondered, or the lightning that produced such a child when she bore a babe with glittering eyes?

Gabrielle. My child. I am supposed to say the issue of my sin, but I cannot. How can sin produce a child such as this?

On the morning of the forty-first day, a ship with black sails appeared in the distance. By noon we could see the glint of curved swords, the ragged snarl of ravenous teeth. By midafternoon, the ship had lashed itself to ours and the men climbed aboard. In anticipation of their arrival, we set food and drink on the deck and opened several — although not all — of our moneyboxes, allowing our gold to shine in the sun. We huddled together before the mainmast, our fingers following prayer after prayer on our well-worn rosaries. I reached for Marguerite, but she was gone.

A man limped from their ship to ours. A man whose face curled in upon itself, whose lashless eyes peered coldly from a sagging brow, whose mouth set itself in a grim, ragged gash in a pitiless jaw. A mouth like an unhealed wound.

Marguerite approached and stood before him. “You are he,” she said.

He stared at her, his cold eyes widening softly with curiosity. “I am,” he said. He was proud, of course. Who else would he be? Or, more importantly, who else would he desire to be? He reached for the cowl that hid the top of her head and shadowed her face and pulled it off. Her hair, the color of wheat, spilled out, poured over the rough cloth that hid her body from the world, pooled over her hands, and around her feet. “And you, apparently, are she.”

She did not answer, but laid her hands upon his cheeks instead. She looked intently into his face, and he returned her gaze, his hard eyes light with tears. “You’re sick,” she said. “You have been for . . . ever so long. And sad as well. I cannot heal the sadness, but I can heal the sickness. He too suffers.” She pointed to the pockmarked man holding a knife to the throat of our beloved Abbot. “And he, and he.” She pointed to other men on the ship. Walking over to the youngest man, who leaned greenly against the starboard gunnels, she laid her hand on his shoulder. “You, my love, I cannot save. I am so sorry.” Tears slipped down her cream and nutmeg skin. The man — barely a man, a boy, in truth — bowed his head sadly. “But I can make it so it will not hurt.” She took his hand, and squeezed it in her own. She brought her pale lips to his smooth brown cheek and kissed him. He nodded and smiled.

Marguerite ordered a bucket to be lowered and filled with seawater. She laid the bucket at the feet of the captain. Dipping her hands in the water, she anointed his head, then his hands and his feet. She laid her ear upon his neck, then his heart, then his belly. Then, scooping seawater into her left hand, she asked the pirate captain to spit into its center. He did, and immediately the water became light, and the light became feathers, and the feathers became a red bird with a green beak who howled its name to the sky. It flew straight up, circled the mainmast, and spiraled down, settling on the captain’s right shoulder.

“Don’t lose him,” she said to the captain.

In this way she healed those who were sick, and soothed the one who was dying, giving each his own familiar: a one-eared cat, an air-breathing fish, a blue albatross, and a silver snake.

When she finished, she turned to the captain. “Now you will return to your ship and we will continue our journey.”

The captain nodded and smiled. “Of course, madam. But the child in your womb will return to us. She was conceived on the sea and will return to the sea. When she is old enough we will not come for her. We will not need to. She will find us.”

Marguerite blinked, bit her lip so hard she drew blood, and returned to the hold without a word. She did not emerge until we made land.

Our brethren that had preceded us met us on the quay and led us to the temporary shelters that crouched, like lichen, on the rock. That the new church with its accompanying cloister and school were unfinished, we knew. But the extent of the disorder was an unconcealed shock to all of us, especially our poor Brother Abbot, whose face was stricken at the sight of the mossy stones upon the ground.

Brother Builder hung his head for the shame of it. “This is a place of entropy and decay,” he muttered to me when the Abbot had gone. “Split wood will not dry, but erupts with mushrooms, though it has heated and cured for days. Cleared land, burned to the ground, will sprout within the hour with plants that we cannot identify or name — but all our seeds have rotted. Keystones crack from the weight of ivy and sweet, heavy blossoms that were not there the night before. The land, it seems, does not wish us to build.”

The Abbot contacted the Governor, who conscripted paid laborers at our insistence — freemen and indentured, Taino and grim-faced Huguenots — to assist with the building, and soon we had not only church and cloister, but library, bindery, stables, root cellars, barrel houses, and distilleries.

Desperately, I hoped that Marguerite would be allowed to stay. I hoped that the Abbot would build her a cottage by the sea where she could keep a garden and sew for the abbey. Of course, she could not. The Abbot gave her a temporary shelter to herself, forcing many of the brethren to squeeze together on narrow cots, but no one grumbled. At the end of our first month on the island, she left without saying good-bye. I saw her on the road as the sun was rising, her satchel slung across her back. Her hair was uncovered and fell in a loose plait down her back, curling at the tops of her boots. I saw her and called her name. She turned and waved but said nothing. She did not need to. The sunlight bearing down on her small frame illuminated at last that to which I had been blind. Her belly had begun to swell.

Gabrielle was born in the vegetable garden that separated the Pleasure House from the small cottage where Marguerite lived and worked. Though the prostitutes gave her shelter in exchange for her skills as a cook, a gardener, and a healer, it soon became clear that her gifts were greater and more numerous than originally thought. As Marguerite’s pregnancy progressed, the gardens surrounding the Pleasure House thrived beyond all imaginings.

Guavas grew to the size of infants, berries spilled across the lawns, staining the stone walkways and steps a rich, dark red, like blood coursing into a beating heart. Vines, thick and strong as saplings, snaked upward along the whitewashed plaster, erupting in multi-colored petals that fluttered from the roof like flags.

Marguerite, when the time came, knelt among the casaba melons and lifted her small hands to the bright sky. Immediately, a cloud of butterflies alighted on her fingers, her heaving shoulders, her rivers of gold hair, as the babe kicked, pressed, and slipped into the bundle of leaves that cradled her to the welcoming earth.

The girls of the Pleasure House saw this. They told the story to everyone. Everyone believed it.

After Gabrielle was born, Marguerite scooped up the afterbirth and buried it at the foot of the guava tree. The girls of the Pleasure House gathered about her to wash the baby, to wheedle the new mother to bed, but Marguerite would not have it. She brought the baby to the spot where the placenta was buried.

“You see this?” she said to the baby. “You are rooted. Here. And here you will stay. The captain can believe what he will, but you are not a thing of water. You are a child of earth. And of me. And I am here.” And with that she went inside and nursed her baby.

Though I assume it was well known that the babe with glittering eyes was the product of the one time (but oh! Once!) that Marguerite Belain consented to love me, we had chosen to believe that the child was a miracle, conceived of lightning, of sea, of the healing goodness of her mother. And in that believing, it became true. Gabrielle was not mine.

For months, the Abbot sent a convoy of monks to the little cottage behind the Pleasure House to argue in favor of a baptism for the child. Marguerite would not consent. No water, save from the spring that bubbled a mile inland, would touch Gabrielle. She would not bathe in the sea. She would not taste or touch water that came from any but her mother’s hand.

“She will be rooted,” she said. “And she will never float away.” After a time, the girls of the Pleasure House emerged to shoo us off. They had all of them grown in health and beauty since Marguerite’s arrival. Their faces freshened, their hair grew bright and strong, and any whiff of the pox or madness or both had dissipated and disappeared. Moreover, their guests, arriving in the throes of hunger and lust, went away sated, soothed, and alive. They became better men. They were gentler with their wives, loving with their children. They fixed the roof of the church, rebuilt the washed-out roads, took in their neighbors after disasters. They lived long, healthy, happy lives and died rich.

Gabrielle Belain was never baptized, though in my dreams, I held that glittering child in my arms and waded into the sea to my waist. In my dream, I scooped up the sea in my right hand and let it run over the red curls of the child that was mine and not mine. Mostly not mine. In my dream, a red bird circled down from the sky, hovered for a moment before us, and kissed her rose-bud mouth.

When Gabrielle was six years old, she wandered out of the garden and down the road to the town square. Her red curls shone with ribbon and oil, and her frock was blue and pretty and new. The girls of the Pleasure House, none of whom bore children of their own, doted on the child, spoiling her with dresses and hats and dolls and sweets. To be fair, though, the girl did not spoil, but only grew in sweetness and spark.

On the road, Gabrielle saw a mongrel dog that had been lamed in a fight. It was enormous, almost the size of a pony, with grizzled fur hanging about its wide, snarling mouth. It panted under the star apple tree, whining and showing its teeth. Gabrielle approached the animal, looked up at the branches heavy with fruit, and held out her hand. A star apple, dark and smooth, fell neatly into her little hand, its skin already bursting with sweet juice. She knelt before the dog.

“Eat,” she said. The dog ate. Immediately, it stood, healed, nuzzled its new mistress, shaking its tail earnestly, and allowed her to climb upon its back. In the market square, people stopped and stared at the pretty little girl riding the mongrel dog. They offered her sweets and fruits and bits of fabric that might please a little child. She came to the fishmonger’s stall. The fishmonger, an old, sour man, was in the middle of negotiating a price with an older, sourer man, and did not notice Gabrielle. A large marlin, quite dead, leaned over the side of the cart, its angled mouth slightly open as though attempting to breathe. Gabrielle, a tender child, put her hand to her mouth and blew the fish a kiss. The fishmonger, satisfied that he had successfully bilked his customer out of more gold than he had made all the week before, looked down and was amazed to see his fish flapping and twisting in the rough-hewn cart. The marlin leapt into the air and gave the customer a sure smack against his wrinkled cheek, before hurling itself onto the cobbled path and wriggling its way to the dock. Similarly, the other fish began to wiggle and jump, tumbling and churning against each other in a jumbled mass toward freedom. People gawked and pointed and gathered as the fishmonger vainly tried to gather the fish in his arms, but he had no idea what to do without the aid of his nets, and his nets were being mended by his foulmouthed wife in their little hovel by the sea.

Gabrielle and her dog, realizing that there was nothing more to see, moved closer to the fine house and tower that served as the Governor’s residence and court and prison. To the side of the deeply polished doors, carved with curving branches and flowers and images of France, was the raised dais where men and women and children in chains stood silently, waiting to be priced, purchased, and hauled away. The man in the powdered wig who called out the fine qualities of the man in chains on his left did not notice the little girl riding the dog. But the man in chains did. She looked up at him, her freckled nose wrinkled in concentration, her green eyes squinting in the sun. She smiled at the man in chains and waved at him. He did not smile back — how could he? — but his eye caught the child’s gaze and held it. Gabrielle watched his hands open and close, open and close, as though grasping and regrasping something invisible, endurable, and true. Something that could not be taken away.

The child began to sing — softly at first. And at first no one noticed. I stood in the receiving room of the Governor’s mansion, waiting to receive dictation for letters going to the governors of other Caribbean territories, to the Mayor and High Inquisitor of New Orleans, and to the advisors to the king himself. This was our tribute to the Governor: rum, wine, transcribed books, and my hands. And for these gifts he left us mostly alone to live and work as pleased God.

Through the window I saw the child who came to me nightly in dreams. I heard the song. I sang too.

The people in the square, distracted by the escaping fish, did not notice the growing cloud of birds that blew in from the sea on one side and the forest on the other. They did not notice how the birds circled over the place where the people stood, waiting to be sold. They did not notice the bright cacophony of feathers, beaks, and talons descending on the dais.

Two big albatrosses upset the traders’ moneyboxes, sending gold spilling onto the dirt. A thousand finches flew in the faces of the guards and officers keeping watch over the square. A dozen parrots landed on the ground next to Gabrielle and sang along with her, though badly and off-key. And hundreds of other birds — and not just birds of the island, birds from everywhere, birds of every type, species, description, and name — spiraled around every man, woman, and child, obscuring vision and confounding hand, foot, and reckoning, before alighting suddenly skyward and vanishing in the low clouds. Gabrielle, her song ended, rode slowly away, as though nothing out of the ordinary had happened. It was several moments before anyone realized that the dais was now empty, and each soul waiting for sale had vanished, utterly. All that was left was an assortment of empty chains lying on the ground.

For weeks after, the Governor, who had invested heavily in the slave-bearing ship and had lost a considerable sum in the disappearing cargo, sent interrogators, spies, and thieves into every home in the town, and while no one knew what had happened or why, everyone commented on the strange, beautiful little girl riding a mongrel dog.

From his balcony atop the mansion, the Governor could see the road that led away from the town, through the groves of fruit trees, through forest, to the Pleasure House and the little cottage surrounded by outrageously fertile gardens. He could see the golden-haired woman with her redheaded child. His breath was a cold wind, his face a merciless wave. A storm gathered in the town, preparing to crush my little Gabrielle.

I went with the Abbot to the cottage behind the Pleasure House, prepared to plead our case. It was not the first time. As the grumblings from the mansion grew louder and more insistent, we wrote letters in secret, sending them to the other islands and to France. Marguerite, dressed in a plain white linen shift, her golden hair braided and looped around her waist like a belt, laid out plates laden with fruit and bread and fish. Gabrielle sat in the corner on a little sleeping pallet. She was nine now and able to read. She came to the abbey often to look at Bibles and maps and poetry. What she read, she memorized. Once she was heard reciting the entire book of Psalms while perched high in a tree gathering nuts.

“Eat,” Marguerite said to us, sitting opposite on the wooden bench and taking out her sewing.

“Later,” the Abbot said, waving the plate away impatiently with his left hand. “Your child is not safe here anymore. You know this, my daughter. The Governor has his spies and assassins everywhere. We could hide her in the abbey, but for how long? It is only at my intercession that he has not come this far down the road, but neither of you is safe within a mile of the town.”

“We need nothing from town,” Marguerite said, filling our glasses with wine. “Drink,” she commanded.

I brought my fist to the table. Gabrielle sat up with a start. “No,” I said. “She cannot stay. I will accompany her back to France, and the Sisters of the Seventh Sorrow will protect her and educate her. No one will know whose child she is. No one will know of the Governor’s hatred. She will be safe.”

Marguerite took my fist and eased it open, laying her palm upon my palm. She looked at the Abbot and then at me.

“She is rooted here. I rooted her myself. She will not go to the sea. There is nothing more to say. Now. Eat.”

We ate. And drank. The wine tasted of flowers, of love, of mother’s milk, of sweat and flesh and dreaming. The food tasted like thought, like memory, like the pale whisperings of God. I dreamed of Gabrielle, growing, walking upon the water, standing with a sword against the sun. I dreamed of the taste of Marguerite’s mouth.

The Abbot and I woke under a tree next to the abbey’s stable.

There was no need to say anything, so we went in for matins.

The next day, a ship with black sails appeared a mile out to sea. The girls of the Pleasure House reported that Marguerite went to the shore, screaming at the ship to depart. It did not. She called to the wind, to the ocean, to the birds, but no one assisted. The ship stayed where it was.

Soldiers came for Gabrielle. Marguerite saw them come. She stood on the roof of her house and raised her hands to the growing clouds. The soldiers looked up and saw that the sky rained flower petals. The petals came down in thick torrents, blinding all who were outdoors. With the petals came seeds and saplings, rooting themselves firmly in the overripe earth. The soldiers scattered, wandering blindly into the forest. Most never returned.

The next day, a thicket of trees grew up around the Pleasure House and the little cottage behind, along with a labyrinthine network of footpaths and trails. Few knew the way in or out. Whether the girls of the Pleasure House grumbled about this, no one knew. They appeared to have no trouble negotiating their way through the thicket, and trained a young boy, the son of the oyster diver, to stand at the entrance and guide men. If an agent of the Governor approached, the boy darted into the trees and disappeared. He was never followed.

The morning of Gabrielle’s tenth birthday, a storm raged from the west, then from the north, then from the east. Everyone on the island prepared for the worst. Anything that could be lashed was lashed. We boarded ourselves in, or ran for high ground. Outside, the wind howled and thrashed against our houses and buildings. The sea churned and swelled before rearing up and crashing down upon the island. Most of the buildings remained more or less intact. At the abbey, the chapel flooded, as did the library, though most of the collection was saved. Several animals died when the smaller stable collapsed.

Once the rains subsided, I journeyed through the thick and cloying mud to check on Marguerite. I found her kneeling in the vegetable patch, weeping as though her heart would break. I knelt down next to her, though I don’t think she noticed me at first. Her pale hands covered her face, and tears ran down her long fingers like pearls. She turned, looked at me full in the face with an expression of such sadness that I found myself weeping though I did not know why.

“The guava tree,” she said. “The sea took it away.”

It was true. Instead of the broad smooth trunk and the reaching branches, a hole gaped before us like a wound. Even the roots were gone.

“There is nothing to hold her here,” she said. And for the first time since the night in the ship’s hold during the storm all those years ago, I reached my arm across her back and coaxed her head to my shoulder. Her hair smelled of cloves and loam and salt. Gabrielle stood on the rocks at the shore, gathering seaweed into a basket to be used for soup. Her dog stayed close to her heels, as though Gabrielle might, at any moment, go skipping away. From time to time, the child peered out at the water, her eyes fixed on the rim of the ocean, or perhaps on something hovering just past the horizon — something that Marguerite and I could not see.

Two weeks later, Gabrielle Belain was gone. She slipped out to sea on the back of a porpoise, and she did not return to the island, except at last in chains in the belly of a prison ship.

From the window in the library, I saw the ship with black sails unfurl itself, draw its anchors, and sail away. From the forest surrounding the Pleasure House, a sound erupted, echoing across the shore, down the road, and deep into the wild lands of the island’s interior. A deep, mournful, sorrowing cry. A dark cloud emerged over the forest and grew quickly across the island, heavy with rain and lightning. It rained for eighteen days. The road washed away, as did the foundations of houses, as well as gardens and huts that had not been securely fastened to the ground.

The Abbot went alone to the place where Marguerite wept. He brought no one with him, but when he returned, the sun reappeared, and Marguerite returned to her work healing sickness and coaxing abundance from the ground.

Every day, she made boats out of leaf and flower and moss, and every day she set them in the waves and watched them disappear across the sea.

Some years later, shortly after Gabrielle reached her fifteenth year, the captain called Gabrielle to his quarters when the pain in his chest grew intolerable.

“The weight of the world, my girl, rests upon my chest, and even your mother wouldn’t be able to fix it this time. That’s saying something, isn’t it?” He laughed, which became a cough, which became a cry of pain.

Gabrielle said nothing, but took his hand between her own and held it as though praying. There was no use arguing. She could see the life paths in other people, and was able to find detours and shortcuts when available to avoid illness or pain or even death. There was no alternate route for her beloved captain. His path would end here.

The red bird whined in its cage, flapping its wings piteously. “I thought that bird would die with me, but he looks like he’s in the prime of his life. Don’t lose him, girl.” He did not explain, and she did not ask.

The captain died, naming Gabrielle his successor, which the crew accepted as both wise and inevitable. As captain, Gabrielle Belain emptied many of the ships heading toward the holdings of the Governor, as well as redirected ships with human cargo, placing maps, compasses, swords, and ship wheels in the palms of hands that once bore chains, and setting the would-be slavers adrift with only a day’s worth of food and water and a book of prayers to help them to repent. The freed ships followed flocks of birds toward home, and Gabrielle prayed that they made it safely. The Governor lost thousands, and thousands more, until he was at the brink of ruination, though he attempted to hide it. This caused the pirates no end of delight.

The red bird remained in his cage for two years next to the portal in the captain’s quarters, though it hurt Gabrielle to see it so imprisoned and alone. Finally, after tiring of his constant complaining, she brought the cage on deck to give the poor thing a chance to see the sun. The mongrel dog growled, then whined for days, but Gabrielle did not notice. There the bird remained on days when it was fine, for another year, until finally, Gabrielle whispered to the bird that if he promised to return, she would let him out for an hour at sundown. The bird promised, and obeyed every day for ten days. But on the eleventh day, the red bird did not return to its cage.

The next morning, a mercenary’s ship approached from the north, and fired a shot into the starboard hull. It was their first hit since the crew’s meeting with Marguerite Belain eighteen years and nine months earlier. The ship listed, fought back, and barely escaped intact. Gabrielle stood on the mast step and peered through her spyglass to Martinique. A storm cloud churned and spread, widening over the thrashing sea.

Down in the ship’s hold, Gabrielle rummaged and searched until she found the empty rum barrel where she had placed the boats made of leaf and flower and moss, which she had fished out of the water when no one was looking. She took one, then thought better of it and took ten and threw them into the water. In the waning light she watched them move swiftly on the calm sea, sailing as one toward Martinique.

Gabrielle Belain (the witch, the revolutionary, the pirate) became the obsession of the Governor, who enlisted the assistance of every military officer loyal to him, every mercenary he could afford, and every captain in possession of a supply of cannons and a crew unconcerned about raising a sword to the child of a Saint Among Men. The third, of course, was most difficult to come by. A soldier will do as he is told, but a seaman is beholden to his conscience and his soul.

For many years, it did not matter. Ships sent out to overtake the ship with black sails, navigated and subsequently commanded by the girl with red hair, flanked as always by a mongrel dog, found themselves floundering and lost. Their compasses suddenly became inoperable, their maps wiped themselves clean, birds landed in massive clouds and ripped their sails to shreds.

In the beauty and comfort of the Governor’s mansion, I took the dictation of a man sick with rage and frustration. His hair thinned and grew gray and yellow by degrees. His flesh sagged about the neck and jowls, while swelling at the middle. As he recited his dictation, he moved about the room like a dying tiger in a very small cage, his movements quick, erratic, and painful.

When Gabrielle was a child and still living on the island, she was to the poor Governor an unfortunately located tick, a maddening bite impossible to scratch. When she boarded the pirate ship and gained the ear of a captain who was both a matchless sailor and ravenous for French gold, she became for the Governor an object of madness. He outlawed the propagation of redheaded children. He made the act of bringing fish back to life a crime punishable by death. He forbade the use of Gabrielle as a given name, and ordered any resident with the name of Gabrielle to change it instantly. He sent spies to infiltrate the wood surrounding the Pleasure House, but the spies were useless. They could have told him, of course, that Marguerite Belain went to the surf every morning to set upon the waves a small boat that sailed straight and true to the far horizon, though it had no sail. They could have told the Governor that every night a blue albatross came to Marguerite’s garden and whispered in her ear.

They told him no such thing. Marguerite instead led the spies into her home, where she fed them and gave them drink. Then, she led them to the Pleasure House. They would appear a few days later, sleeping on the road, or wandering through the market, examining fish.

The Governor, gesticulating wildly, dictated a letter to the king, asking for more ships with which to capture or kill the pirate Gabrielle Belain. He detailed the crimes of the pirate — twenty-five ships relieved of their tax gold, eighteen slave ships either freed or vanished altogether, rum houses raided, sugar fields burned — all these things I wrote to his satisfaction, confident that the king would, as usual, do nothing. In the midst of our audience, however, a young man threw open the doors without announcing himself and without apologizing. The Governor, sputtering with rage, threw his fist upon the desk. The young man did not stop.

“The black ship,” he said, “has been lamed.”

The Governor stood without breathing. “Lamed,” he said, “when?”

“Last night. They hailed the Medallion, who brought the message presently. They have taken refuge on the lee of St. Vincent. The injury to the black ship is grave and will take several days, I am told, to remedy.”

“And the ship who lamed it. Is it sound?”

“They lost a mast to cannon fire, but the ship, crew, and instruments are sound. Nothing lost, nothing.” The young man paused. “Strange.

The Governor walked across the room, threw the doors open with such force that he cracked one down the middle. Whether he noticed or not, he did not acknowledge, nor did he take leave of me. The young man also left without a word. I laid my pages on the table and went to the window, the prayers for the intercession of the Blessed Mother tumbling from my lips. I stood at the window and watched as rumors of lightning whispered at the sky.

On the first of May, 1698, the ship with black sails was surrounded and beaten, its deck boarded and its crew put in irons. Messages were sent to the islands of France, England, and Spain that Gabrielle Belain (the pirate, the witch, the revolutionary) had been captured at last, and her execution had been duly scheduled. The citizens of Saint-Pierre brought flowers and breads and wine to the edge of the wood surrounding the Pleasure House. They lifted their children onto their shoulders that they might catch a glimpse of the woman who was once the girl who brought the fish to life, and who rode on the back of a porpoise, and who inherited the saintly, healing hands of her mother.

The day before Gabrielle Belain was to be executed, a large red bird visited the window, hovered on the sill, and kissed her mouth through the bars. This the people saw. This the people believed. In that moment, Gabrielle began to sing. She did not stop.

The Governor, as he welcomed representatives from neighboring protectorates and principalities, attempted the pomp and protocol befitting such a meeting. He heard the song of the girl pirate in the tower. His foreign guests did not, even as it grew louder and louder. The Governor rattled his sword, ran a shaking hand through his thinning, yellowed hair. He attempted to smile, as the song grew even louder.

The people in the market square heard the song as well. They heard a song of flowers that grew into boats that brought bread to hungry children. They heard a song of a tree that bore fruit for anyone who was hungry, of a cup that brought water to any who thirsted. She sang of a kiss that set the flesh to burning, and the burning to seed, and the seed to sprout and flower and heavily fruit. The people heard the song and sorrowed for the redheaded child, barely a woman now, who would die in the morning.

The song kept the Governor awake all night. He paced and cursed. He made singing illegal. He made music a crime worthy of death. Were it not for the celebrations planned around the scheduled execution of the pirate, he would have slit her throat then and there, but dignitaries had arrived for a death march, and a death march they would see.

In the moments before the dawn crept over the edge of the sky, the Governor consented that I would be allowed into Gabrielle’s cell to administer baptism, absolution, and last rites. Gabrielle stood at the window where she had stood all night and the previous day, the song still spilling from her lovely mouth, though quietly now, barely a breath upon her tongue. I offered her three sacraments, and three sacraments she refused, though she consented to hold my hand. I thought she did this to comfort herself, a moment of tenderness for a girl about to die. When the soldiers came to take her to the gallows, she turned to embrace me for the first time. She placed her mouth to my ear and whispered, “Don’t follow.”

So I did not. I let the soldiers take her away. I did not fight and I did not follow. I sat on the floor of the tower and wept.

Gabrielle, still singing, walked without struggle in the company of soldiers, all of whom begged her for forgiveness. All of whom told her stories of how her mother had saved a member of their family or blessed their gardens with abundance. Whether she listened, I do not know. I remained in the tower. All I know are the stories people later told.

They say that she walked with her eyes on the ground, her mouth still moving in song. They say she stepped up onto the platform as the constable read the charges against her. He had several pages of them, and the people began to shift and fuss in their viewing area. As the constable read, Gabrielle’s song grew louder. No one noticed a boat approaching in the harbor. A boat made of flowers and moss and leaves. A boat with no sail, though it moved swift and sure with a woman standing tall at its center.

Gabrielle’s song grew louder, until with a sudden cry, she threw her chained hands into the air and tossed her red hair back. A mass of birds — gulls, martins, doves, owls, bullfinches — appeared as a great cloud overhead and descended over and around the girl, blocking her from view. The Governor ordered his men to shoot. They did, but the flock numbered in the thousands of thousands, so while the square was littered in dead birds, the cloud rose nonetheless, the girl suspended in its center, and moved to the small craft floating in the harbor.

The Governor, his rage clamping hard around his throat and heart, ordered his ships boarded, ordered his cannons loaded, ordered his archers to shoot at will, but the craft bearing the two women skimmed across the water and vanished from sight.

This I learned from the people in the square, and this I believe, though the Governor issued a proclamation that the execution was a success, that the pirate Gabrielle Belain was dead, and that anyone who claimed otherwise risked imprisonment. Everyone, of course, claimed otherwise. No one was imprisoned.

That night, I stole gold from the coffers of the Abbey and walked down the road to the harbor. My beloved Abbot knew, I’m certain. The stores where such treasures are kept are always locked, but the Abbot left them unlocked and did not send for me after my crime. I purchased a small skiff and set sail by midday.

I am, alas, no sailor. My map, one that I copied myself, paled, faded, and vanished to a pure white page on the third day of my voyage. I dropped my compass into the sea, where it was promptly devoured by a passing fish. I have searched for a boat made of leaf, but I have found only salt. I have searched for two faces that I have loved. Gabrielle. Marguerite. The things I have loved. The scratch of quill to paper. The Abbot. France. Martinique. Perhaps it is all one. One curve of a wanton hip of a guileless god. Or perhaps my believing it is one has made it one. Perhaps this is the nature of things.

I do not know — nor, indeed, does it matter that I know — whether these words shall ever be read. It is not, as our beloved Abbot told me again and again, the reading that saves, but the writing: it is in the writing that the Word is Flesh. In our Order, we have copied, transcribed, and preserved words — both God’s and Man’s — for the last thousand years. Now, as I expire here in this waste of water and wind and endless sky, I write of my own disappearing, and this, my last lettering, will likely fade, drift, and vanish into the open mouth of the ravenous sea.

I have dreamed of their hands. I dream of their hands. I dream of a garden overripe and wild. Of a woman gathering the sea into her hands and letting it fall in many colored petals to a green, green earth. I dream of words on a page transforming to birds, and birds transforming to children, and children transforming to stars.

Tayari Jones Writes About People with Problems, Not Problems with People

Tayari Jones’ first novel Leaving Atlanta didn’t only introduce me to a new favorite author; it also taught me a lot from a craft standpoint. The book follows the story of three children during a time of great fear, capturing the heightened awareness of a threat and also the reality that life doesn’t end when tragedy strikes. As a reader, I was emotionally gutted. Jones’ attention to people and situations as well as a very expert knowledge on story construction kept pushing me to probe deeper as a writer.

An American Marriage: A Novel: Jones, Tayari: 9781616201340: Amazon.com:  Books

I’ve read every novel Jones has published since Leaving Atlanta, and while I’m still a huge fan of her first novel, the material she tackles and the people she creates get better with each new book — from The Untelling to Silver Sparrow to her latest, An American Marriage. American Marriage poses a lot of discussion in terms of race, gender, and societal expectations. Feelings may very well run the gamut as you hear from Celestial, Roy, and Andre — a love triangle that has resonances far beyond mere romance. Celestial and Roy are a young married couple, still almost newlyweds when Roy is falsely accused and later incarcerated. While the world for Roy stands still behind bars, it continues to spin for Celestial. Celestial’s role as wife is an unbearable weight forcing her to consider the kind of love she and Roy do have. When Roy is released, the tensions between him, Celestial, and Andre (Celestial’s childhood friend and new beau) come to a head.

I spoke to Tayari about dealing with social issues in An American Marriage, reader reactions to the book, and how expectation, be it of genre or character, challenges readers to appreciate the larger story and its delivery.


Jennifer Baker: While An American Marriage centers on the core characters’ relationships, it’s not necessarily a social justice-y novel that focuses on the issues of incarceration.

Tayari Jones: Social justice is not a character. Every person who is impacted by social issues is also busy living a life. When people say, “it’s about them and not about the issue,” I feel like every good novel is about the people.

Just like in my first novel on the Atlanta child murders, I was not so much interested in whodunit. I was interested in to whom was it done. What it was like for people growing up in Atlanta in that time. How did it affect their coming of age? In this novel I’m really interested in the way Celestial and Roy’s young marriage has been impacted by this major racial injustice, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s a marriage. And how the marriage works or fails depends on the two people.

Every person who is impacted by social issues is also busy living a life.

JB: But you don’t ignore the issue.

TJ: No, the issue is part of their lives. My mentor used to tell me, “Write about people and their problems. Don’t write about problems and their people.” So Celestial and Roy are real people with a problem.

JB: And you also bring Andre into it. It’s about the marriage, but Andre is a factor that we can’t ignore.

TJ: It’s a love triangle. I put Andre’s voice in because there were things happening to Andre. Also I just like the guy. But I needed to have two male voices because I didn’t like the way it started to feel like Roy was standing in for “the Black man.”

Just putting Andre in there — giving more than one voice a Black male experience — it took a lot of pressure off of each of them not to have to function symbolically. It allowed them each to function more as individuals.

JB: Another thing that comes up is the dictation of behavior and the expectation from family. Celestial and Andre deal with that a lot.

TJ: I think they all do. It’s just that Celestial and Andre are not doing what people want. And Roy, for example, all his life everyone who has met him has thrown him a parade. His whole life. All his life everyone has been so excited about him because I think he represents Black male progress in a way that people like. I think he doesn’t realize the extent to which he is influenced by societal and familial…. For him he wouldn’t describe it as pressure, I think he’d describe it as influence. But he has just been on the right side of what people have always wanted for him his whole life. Whereas Celestial is a woman trying to make her own way, she is constantly butting up against people’s expectations that is not affirming.

46 Books By Women of Color to Read in 2018

JB: Why did you decide to make Celestial an artist? Because that comes into play for their marriage too.

TJ: To make Celestial an artist was a hard decision for me. I decided to make her an artist and Roy would be her subject. And if you think about it Roy is delighted with her art when he feels it celebrates him in an uncomplicated way. Like when she’s making dolls that look like him as a baby. He loves that. But when she makes a doll that reflects his situation in prison and she receives accolades for it, it makes him uncomfortable.

JB: But she also doesn’t talk about where it comes from.

TJ: She doesn’t talk about him. She talks about how she’s interested in mass incarceration and wrongful imprisonment. But she doesn’t say his name. So even though he’s inspired the art, it doesn’t reflect him in the way he wants to be reflected. But then he says something interesting to her: “I’m gonna tell you, no amount of art has ever gotten anyone out of prison,” when she says she wants to raise awareness about the issue. And as an artist myself I thought there are limits to what art can accomplish. It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t make art. It doesn’t mean art isn’t valuable. But when Roy says that to her, it humbled me as a writer.

JB: That’s another thing Celestial has to argue for as well. She keeps asking Roy “Can’t you understand?”

TJ: This is her life’s work. This is the thing I’ve been working toward all my life. But the fact of incarceration makes anything she enjoys seem almost criminal. And then you think about that metaphorically as an African American narrative. For any of our pleasures when our brethren and sistren are in such distress: Is there a built-in guilt factor with our own mobility?

JB: Do you think readers have a hard time grasping at that because of those predetermined notions of protecting men, as in ‘women do this to protect men’? Just like Celestial’s father seems to be that representative who wants to protect Roy. He keeps leaning on the big societal issues, that he was just at the wrong time and wrong place…

TJ: “…and the least you can do is to preserve yourself in amber for him.” It’s as though people can only think of her support system in one way, which is romantically/sexually. And she says she is not going to deny her sexuality, then it’s like you’re horrible, you’re abandoning him. There’s only one way she can be supportive? And I kind of think that’s unfair to her.

JB: I’m a woman who reacted to that and thought/felt certain way. I wanna say felt because maybe that’s where it’s coming from? People are feeling a certain way?

TJ: Yes, and I think there’s also a challenge in expectation of genre. Because when you say it’s a novel involving wrongful incarceration you assume the novel is an issue novel about a fight to freedom. You have to know how the characters are positioned. So when a novel kind of challenges expectation of genre it is frustrating to the reader on some level. I think the reader has to power through to read something different from what she was expecting.

I think the reader has to power through to read something different from what she was expecting.

JB: And how was that for you to write and feel, in the end, “This is exactly where this needs to be”?

TJ: The last 50 pages or so were really hard for me because I had to figure how all three of these people who I feel are very sincere in their intentions — how could they all walk away from this sadder but wiser? I felt like they were my 3 children and I had to make sure they all get a gift under the tree. And it has to be believable and it has to be real. So my question was: How can we move forward into the future together? And so I had to figure it out. It was a hard question.

’Cause at first I was saying “This is a love triangle, someone’s gotta lose.” Then I realized that was the wrong way to think about it.

JB: Because losing meant something else?

TJ: It made getting the girl or not getting the girl the measure of the experience. And as Andre says Celestial is not something like a wallet. The expectation of genre means if you say something is a love triangle it means who gets the girl? Who gets the guy? And I had to take that genre expectation out of my own head. And the question is: How can they each move forward whole?

That genre expectation is very, very difficult. If a story has a detective in it, you think it’s a detective story. So if you have a novel with a detective and they don’t solve the crime at the end you’d be very frustrated because of your expectation of genre. It can be a fine book with an emotional ending, but if you don’t know whodunit you feel like the book didn’t honor “the contract with the reader.” And I realized that when Roy was wrongfully incarcerated I was setting a certain contract. When I decided it was a love triangle I was making another contract. So I had to renegotiate both those contracts in order to write this book.

If a story has a detective in it, you think it’s a detective story. So if you have a novel with a detective and they don’t solve the crime at the end you’d be very frustrated because of your expectation of genre.

JB: I think people are also consistently focusing on the incarceration.

TJ: I think that’s absolutely true. And incarceration is such a gendered situation. I think they’re thinking that because it begins with Roy’s voice, because it’s read as a book about a man they don’t see that it’s a book about gender even though men have a gender as well.

So much of this is about masculinity. It’s about fatherhood. I feel that’s what makes Roy able to go on with life is that he has to reconfigure his understanding of self and masculinity. He thinks that to be a free man is to exert dominance over his household. But what he learns to be a free human being means that you’re a person who can exercise empathy. That being empathetic is not a luxury. That it is a core tenet of your humanity. And with that you are a free. That’s what he has to learn. So he has to set down these antiquated, Odysseus ideas for what it means to have a triumphant homecoming, what it is to be a free person.

How Does a Tragedy Become Art?

Capturing the most joyous, life-changing moments on camera is either a stroke of luck or the result of careful planning. The tragic instants that alter lives, however, are rarely images we want to frame; when they are caught on film, we’re left with certain questions: what to do with this tangible reminder of sadness? Who exactly owns the rights to this moment? The person, their family, the capturer?

Purchase the novel.

The protagonist in Rachel Lyon’s debut novel Self-Portrait with Boy, Lu, takes a photograph that accidentally captures a young boy’s final moments. From there, she is faced with a dilemma. Does she exhibit the haunting but beautiful photograph to further her art career? Or keep it private and protect the family’s emotions?

In addition to exploring what role art should or should not play in tragedy, Lyon also focuses her novel on the gentrification of her childhood neighborhood, Dumbo, in the early 1990s. These two themes provide a formidable narrative of passion, struggle, and art.

I spoke with the author about the place for tragedy in art, and where she sees finds fiction in her realities.

Adam Vitcavage: Where did you get the idea for the photograph that is at the center of Lu’s story?

Rachel Lyon: I grew up in a building similar to Lu’s building in the book in Dumbo. Before I was really old enough to understand what was happening, a boy did fall from the roof and died. I wasn’t aware that that happened at the time. I found out about it in my twenties when I was writing more seriously. It became a generative image for me.

AV: When you found about the incident, did you immediately start writing about it?

RL: I don’t think I knew I immediately wanted to write about it. I did want to write about Dumbo because the neighborhood meant a lot to me. It disappeared very quickly after we moved out. It was transformed and the landscape looks very different now. I knew I wanted to write about that space and that time. The tragedy became kind of an anchor.

Suicidal Ideation and Who We Allow to Be Real

AV: When I first saw the title of the book and read the synopsis, I started to think about a lot of tragedies that became art or pop culture. The Falling Man from 9/11 comes to mind. Esquire wrote an article a few years back; it was a documentary; DeLillo has a book about it. Did you draw inspiration from how events like were incorporated into narratives?

RL: I was thinking about the Falling Man—I read that Don DeLillo book in grad school. It’s a strange, interesting novel. In undergrad, I took this course on ekphrasis writing, which is writing about other art forms and writing toward other art forms in some way. It was a natural extension of that approach.

AV: Do you feel if there is any event that is too personal to capture for art or to portray publicly?

RL: I think there are two answers. On one hand, if it’s someone else’s personal story it becomes debatable. We start talking about crossing boundaries in art and who gets to tell whose stories. Those are the questions raised in my book.

But there is also the question of whether anything of one’s own is too personal to make art from? That is only a reasonable question if we consider of how much perspective you can give something. There are personal things I can’t write about because I don’t understand them yet. They’re too deep inside of me. I have no way of putting them in words, nor giving them the kind of wisdom and perspective I want to give anything I write about. You can’t objectively understand things that are too personal to you.

Is anything of one’s own too personal to make art from?

There is a photo I saw while researching this book. It was a picture of a corpse. A naked corpse with a tag on his toe and you can see his penis. It’s really intense. I was thinking about the photographer when I was writing Lu’s story. I think all of those questions about crossing boundaries and using the story of a stranger and even a friend are really interesting. I don’t know if there is a right answer.

AV: The photo you bring up is interesting because a few months ago a YouTuber faced a lot of controversy about filming a hanged body in Japan’s suicide forest. How he presented it deserved the controversy but deep down I was thinking, “What if National Geographic sent someone on assignment and photographed the same body?” When does tragedy become okay in media?

RL: Yeah, you think about the monk setting himself on fire in Saigon during the Vietnam War and the power that image carried with it for awareness and change. Photography is a way of soliciting these strong feelings. I think context is everything.

AV: How do you use people’s stories to shape your own fiction?

RL: I like to quote to my students that old chestnut: good writers borrow and great writers steal. I don’t want to treat anyone disrespectfully. For instance, I purposefully didn’t want to learn anything about the family of the actual boy who died in Dumbo. I wanted to keep this fictional and keep it my story. I didn’t want to cross any boundaries.

I wanted to keep this fictional and keep it my story. I didn’t want to cross any boundaries.

You know I’m not a mother, I never lost anyone that close to me. It was hard for me to approach that grief when I was writing Kate and dealing with this grieving character. It was a kind of feeling that I found it hard to conceive of. Fortunately, I was writing in Lu’s voice, but when I was writing Kate’s dialogue and working on her character, I talked to someone who has lost people who are very, very close to her. I used some of her language there. I’m sure she recognizes her voice in certain parts of it and I hope she feels it was portrayed accurately and it feels true to her.

AV: With this lady, how did you broach the subject of you writing her experience into the book?

RL: We’re friends. We were talking about her life and so on. I did tell her that what she said was useful for me in terms of the book and that I would like to incorporate it. I can’t not bring in what I read, hear, see, and talk about into my work. Our brain is a big pile of junk and you take from it what you will and that’s what creates the novel.

Double Take: ‘The Epiphany Machine’ Takes Tragicomedy Into Terrifying New Corners

AV: Is the book you set out to write the book we know it as now?

RL: It changed a lot. I worked on it for a long time. Longer than I realized actually. A little while ago I was going through files on my computer and I came across some documents I had written before I went to grad school; so, around 2008 and possibly even earlier. There were dribs and drabs. I had this idea for a novel called The Love Artist which was about a character named alternatively Louise and Lucy who was using love as her medium and hurting people along the way. That was one concept that fizzled out. There was another document that was just a woman visiting her parents and there was a long scene of her driving up a highway in an old car. That made it into the book eventually. That was one of the oldest sections and it is outside of the plot but ended up in there.

Portrait has been through a lot of iterations. The penultimate draft was all in third person that had different POVs in it of three or four characters. When I got to the end of that draft I realized I needed to simplify. I went back and started writing chronologically from the beginning—all from Lu’s voice—once I figured out the plot.

AV: After that third person draft and going back, what was that process like? Was it as simple as changing the tense or did you completely re-write it?

RL: I had completed that penultimate draft and I knew it was a mess, but I just wanted it to be okay. I was listening to this podcast at the time called A Tiny Sense of Accomplishment which is Sherman Alexi and Jess Walter in conversation. They talk about process and share works in progress. It was fun to hear them hear them read their works in progress out loud and how they’re frustrated.

Sherman Alexi told this anecdote in one episode where he was a guest professor at an MFA or summer program and this woman working on a novel asked him from some advice about a novel that wasn’t coming together. She wanted to know how to finish it. He remembered something he heard about a filmmaker who would write his screenplays by taking a piece of lined paper and numbering it from one to forty five. Each page would be a scene and by the end of it that would be a story. Alexi said a novel would have more scenes than a movie so he suggested to number pages one to sixty scenes and go from there. She came back years later and she said it worked.

I could see the whole plot of the novel in front of me. I hadn’t been able to see before.

I heard that and I was struggling myself so I tried this whole sixty scenes thing. It works pretty well. I could see the whole plot of the novel in front of me. I hadn’t been able to see before. I kept the whole document minimized and I spent the next year and three months writing again with that outline.

AV: When you’re writing this draft, are you editing as you go?

RL: I made a rule for myself that I wasn’t allowed to edit as I was producing new material. I couldn’t get bogged down that way. I tried to write the whole draft. There were inevitably times when I had writer’s block and I just needed to edit.

I wrote the final line and spent thirty-six manic hours going back and copy-editing before sending it to the person who became my agent.

AV: Going forward with your writing, is this a process you’re going to continue with?

RL: In a way. I’m not going to do the sixty scenes because it’s hard to know exactly how many scenes you’ll need. For the current novel I’m working on, I’m writing chronologically. More or less. I started it that way and got to 150 pages. Now I jumped to the end. I’m going to have to spend some months filling in the middle third.

7 Books to Remind You That Life Goes On for Women After 70

Netflix’s Grace and Frankie just dropped its fourth season, which means a whole lot of people are binge watching the adventures of two 70-something friends (and their gay ex-husbands). Jane Fonda’s Grace and Lily Tomlin’s Frankie are decades older than most of the women we see in leading television roles, but they easily carry the show—and though they’re frank and humorous about the challenges of aging, they’re never the butt of the joke.

It’s rare to see senior women on TV at all, let alone dating, doing drugs, running a business, and having fun with their friends. If you’re hungry for more content like Grace and Frankie, you may be out of luck on the small screen—but we’ve rounded up seven novels whose over-70 protagonists do more than just reminisce and wait to die. If you are, know, or just want to become a fierce old lady, start here.

The Summer Book, Tove Jansson

Jansson showed her keen understanding of the complex and sometimes dark inner worlds of children in her beloved Moomintroll series. In The Summer Book, she also explores the emotions and experience of adult caregivers—specifically, an elderly woman looking after her six-year-old granddaughter on a small Finnish island. Their story is told in a series of luminous vignettes that highlight the pair’s strong personalities, warm relationship, and simple pleasures.

Florence Gordon, Brian Morton

The eponymous protagonist of Morton’s novel may be 75, but she has no interest in slowing—or calming—down. Lifelong feminist Florence is irreverent, accomplished, sometimes ferocious, and committed to living an independent life, but must still reckon with the way her fate (and feelings) are bound up with her family’s.

Like a Mule Bringing Ice Cream to the Sun, Sarah Ladipo Manyika

Former English professor Dr. Morayo Da Silva, going on 75 years old, spends some of this novel reflecting on her past in Nigeria—but the rest of it navigating her present as she lives alone in San Francisco, dealing with the challenges of an aging body and the benefits of a clear memory and determined mind. Deeply engaged with the world and community around her, Morayo tells her own story but is joined by some of the people who have touched her life (and vice versa).

Two Old Women, Velma Wallis

This novel, based on a legend from the indigenous Gwich’in people of Alaska, pits two elderly women against conditions that would test even the young and healthy. Sa’ (75) and Ch’idzigyaak (80) are abandoned by their tribe in the treacherous winter tundra. Rather than despair over this betrayal, the two find ways to hunt, cook, shelter, travel, and stay warm, and wind up as symbols of perseverance—and the importance of the elderly—to the tribe members who tried to leave them behind.

Arsenic and Old Lace, Joseph Kesselring

Listen, for some of us an active old age means travel and yoga, and for others it means poisoning people in your parlor. The important thing is keeping busy. In this classic play (later a classic movie), the elderly Brewster sisters turn out to have a cellar full of corpses—but, you know, in a funny way.

An Unnecessary Woman, Rabih Alameddine

Beirut native Aaliya Sobhi is 72, estranged from her husband, and seemingly invisible to her family—but she has a rich inner life, thanks to her passion for translating literature. The novel is more interior monologue than plot, covering Aaliya’s memories of her youth in wartime Beirut but also her feverish, secretive, and very much still vital love of words.

The Hearing Trumpet, Leonora Carrington

At 92, Marian Leatherby is unable to resist being committed to an institution by her family (though she can hear them plotting, thanks to the gift of an ornate ear trumpet). But her life is far from constrained, as the institution turns out to be a surreal and somewhat sinister wonderland. This strange and fantastic novel shows that otherworldly adventures are not limited to the young.

Through Books, I Learned to Love the Natural World I Never Saw

Novel Gazing is Electric Literature’s personal essay series about the way reading shapes our lives. This time, we asked: What’s a book that made you fall in love?

I once painted a half-shell of coriander seed into a ladybug beetle and pretended it was my pet. I placed it on the leaf of a potted plant, left it alone for a while, then came back, moved it onto another leaf and left it alone again. I did this for a few days, and I remember adults cooing over how sweet the beetle was, or how clever it was for me to have looked at a seed and seen an animal. I remember feeling small, sorry for myself, and quite silly. Despite my best efforts, I couldn’t trick myself with the fiction I had created: the beetle was on a bottom leaf in the morning, and now it’s up on top, it must be alive, it must be the kind of magic that only works when you’re not looking.

I grew up in Dubai, which is hard on a child with an imagination. I often describe my world as one of concrete boxes — the climate was nearly always too hot to explore outdoors, so I never played more than a few meters away from air conditioning, sealed windows, and paved floors. Not much grew that was not planted and obsessively watered. Wet soil would desiccate within a matter of hours of sun. Animals were city-hardy, the sort that stole from trash cans and lipped from condensation dripping off air conditioning boxes, or the sort that lived in under sinks and within the walls.

I read, wildly, overcompensating for my uninspired surroundings. I took everything I encountered in books for literal truth. If I were a city person — and a desert city person at that — I was also a woodsman, a flower fairy, a dragon tamer, a dolphin. If I read, I was alive.

Along came a boy.

He was untameably curious and, when I first met him, he just happened to have discovered a mother scorpion in the back of his garden, carrying dozens of babies on her back — each one a perfect, miniature reproduction of its parent, from pincers to venom-tipped tail. I’d never seen such a remarkable thing before, and neither had the boy. Enthralled with what he’d found, he decided to catch the mother and her babies and bring them home in a matchbox to learn more about them. Lunch was served, the boy’s family gathered, and the matchbox temporarily forgotten. Eventually, the boy’s older brother rummaged about for a cigarette and matches. Of course, he picked up the wrong matchbox. Of course, the scorpion and her babies got out. In the pandemonium that ensued, of course, the family dog bit the cook on the ankle.

The first time I read this story, I laughed out loud — in the middle of an English comprehension test at school. It was excerpted from the loosely autobiographical novel, My Family and Other Animals, by Gerald Durrell, an account of young Gerry Durrell’s life on the Greek island of Corfu, some years before World War II. I was a preteen when I read the story, around the same age as Gerry in the novel. I remember making a note of the book’s title, one of the only times I’ve learned something of value from a school test. I hunted down a copy of the book, and it remains one of my most treasured companions.

My Family is equal parts a comic retelling of a family of eccentrics and a love letter to the Mediterranean wilds of Corfu. Gerry’s widowed mother moves her family from England to escape the dreary weather, and tries her best to keep calm with gardening and experimental feasts while her children convert the rest of their new home in service to their divergent passions. Gerry’s older siblings include an aspiring actress, a huntsman in training, and a long-suffering novelist — the later-famous Lawrence Durrell. The family’s histrionics over the course of the book include inadvisable Gothic romances, guns going off at odd hours of the night, and hosting guests of delicate, excitable dispositions. Once, a night of drunkenness nearly leads to a bed nearly catching fire, occupant included.

Gerry, for his part, brings animals, alive and dead, into the family fold. Apart from scorpions, the Durrell family plays reluctant host to a pair of magpies, a tortoise, a gull, several dogs, terrapins, an owl, and water snakes, to name a few. His room contains birds’ nests, interesting shells, specimen jars teeming with ditch-water invertebrates, pinned insect collections, and a badly taxidermied bat. Despite their misgivings about turning the homestead into a menagerie, the family encourage their precocious youngest in his inquiries, arranging the odd tutor here and there to guide the boy, but otherwise allowing him to roam the island unfettered.

Thus, we experience Corfu through the unfiltered lens of a child scientist. Gerald Durrell would go on to become a naturalist and zookeeper, but his early academic training is enviously free of such mundanities as classrooms and examinations. Gerry rambles from tidepools to hilltops, climbs trees, pokes in ditches and hollows, and rows a rotund, homemade boat around the island’s shore. He learns Greek by befriending neighbors and tradesfolk. He learns about animal diets and relationships, hunting and hiding behaviors, anatomy and locomotion through obsessive observation. He collects, dissects, preserves, and raises animals purely out of curiosity and wonderment.

Oh, to be so bold as to love a creature down to its cellular workings and up and out to the very limits of its habitat! I didn’t know it was possible. Or rather, I didn’t know it was possible in real life. Durrell’s book, a novelized nonfiction, suggested to me that it was hardly eccentric to be the sort of child who would make friends with a housefly in a classroom, just to watch it sponge sweat off your skin, just so you could study how its tongue worked. Or that if you find a baby bat fallen from a light fixture in a stairwell, it’s perfectly normal not to squeal in horror, but to pick it up and wonder how to nurse it back to health.

By Gerry’s example, I gave myself sanction to be a sort of naturalist even in my land of limited resources. Dubai’s naturally arid climate does not support a great diversity of species, but humans cannot settle in places that don’t support some kind of life. I studied the cracks in walls and pavements, and poked around in hedgerows and potted plants. I practiced love for ants and feral cats, the corpses of geckos and fallen feathers. I kept guppies to watch them birth live young. I kept a snail rescued from an orchid imported from Thailand. I tried to raise a hawk moth caterpillar on the leaves of the bush I found it crawling upon. I killed it, because I was still learning.

By Gerry’s example, I gave myself sanction to be a sort of naturalist even in my land of limited resources.

Midsummers in Dubai, surface temperatures hot enough to fry eggs, I’d return to My Family and Other Animals as a vacationer does, fleeing bad weather for better climes, ready to dip my toes in sea water and comb field grasses for beetles. I considered Gerry a dear friend, a compatriot who understood that entertainment and enchantment isn’t manufactured but found, uncontrolled and unheeding of an audience, wherever an animal makes a burrow or disembowels its prey, wherever there is water, and light, and a little space to breathe. I’ve had many fantasies growing up, but none so poignant as that of living in the real world, a world made vivid in Durrell’s writing, a world in which I coexisted with the stuff our collective mythologies — beasts that flew, that leapt, beasts that slithered and dissolved into the sea.

In a continuing trend, more of us will grow up in urban environments in the decades to come, and more of what we consider wild and alive and non-construct will exist on the periphery of our daily lives, so alien as to be unintelligible. Yet nature persists in the green spaces of our gardens and our city parks. It builds its nests above our air conditioning units and encrusts the plumbing leading out of our homes. It thrives under our fingernails and upon our skin. Every so often, a hawk moth will alight above the door jamb and we must pause and take in its mottled wings, its inscrutable eyes, the aerodynamic weight of its body. Every blue moon, a nightjar will take rest on the balcony, trying to look like a tree stump protruding from the metal railing, and we must linger behind the curtains and watch it sleep.

Nature persists in books. There’s a particular hypnosis that occurs when reading that I think is very similar to that which occurs while watching an animal go about its business. It’s a state of empathy — you’re imagining yourself through the eyes of a character in the book. In the woods, in a city, you spy an animal, and you’re imagining yourself with six legs, with fins, with a beak.

There’s a particular hypnosis that occurs when reading that I think is very similar to that which occurs while watching an animal go about its business.

Durrell’s book taught me that the written word and the natural world coexisted and kept each other alive. Since his lifetime, and especially so in mine, I fear the loss that we are creating through ecosystem destruction. I fear our loss of empathy. How can we feel what we do not experience? How can we love what we do not know? Nature is a map we’ve torn up, and we’ve lost so many pieces. When we put it back together again, what should we scrawl in the empty spaces? Here were komodo dragons. Dodos. A thousand species of rainforest frogs. A million species of solitary bees.

Those who know me as an adult would not be surprised that I collect animal bones and unusually shaped seeds out of compulsion. Or that I keep tadpoles in a small tank on my bookshelf. That there are dozens of iridescent insects and one sadly dead hummingbird in my freezer, that a tree appears in every third poem I’ve written, or that I wear a magnifying loupe around my neck when I’m out about town, in case of lichens. I do it to pay homage to childhood, to a universal spirit of inquiry so often quashed in children before it can take root. I do it to affirm that it is possible, necessary even, to bear witness to this world we’re given, where none of us is alive alone.

Harnessing the Anger of a Generation

An excerpt from ‘Passage’

After a heated conversation about how either of them could shoot better than most of the players on the Knicks, Warrior and his father returned to the living room with warmed plates of food. Warrior’s mouth watered as he ate. His father always cooked with spices upon spices — pepper, garlic, butter, brown sugar, and hot sauce were everywhere. The chicken, cooked till browned, of course, fell off the bone, and the yellow saffron rice and bright orange yams were so good they even looked pretty. “Damn, Daddy. . . This . . . is . . . good,” Warrior said, licking his fingers.

His father smiled with pride. “You know it is.”

Then Warrior and his father sat in absolute silence. Warrior sank deeper into the burgundy couch, his father in the cherry wood rocking chair. In the absence of voices, the hum of the refrigerator, the tick of the clock, and the creak of the chair kept the beat, and his father rocked.

Warrior finished eating and leaned back into the couch. The living room was filled with instruments of every kind. A piano was in the far corner; one of his father’s basses sat at his feet, a guitar lay on top of the piano, a banjo with one broken string leaned against the wall, and drums were everywhere. Near the shelves piled high with books, was an entire silver and light honey brown drum set. There were congas of all sizes sitting around the room, waiting.

Warrior looked at a photograph of a smoky Blues joint. In the picture people were grindin’, legs wrapped around each other, as the saxophone player on the makeshift stage blew filthy notes. A few feet away on the same wall hung a dark, black-and-white photograph of Nelson Mandela looking out from behind bars in his jail cell. The shadows of the bars cast lines across his face as his eyes looked out in the distance.

“I saw Mandela on TV the other day, talking about how when he was a child he never thought he’d be where he is today. He thought he would be a shepherd out in the countryside,” Warrior said as his father finished the last of his dinner.

“A man can’t run from destiny. And his wasn’t bein’ no shepherd. That brutha is a baad cat, one for history,” his father said, wiping his mouth with the back of his hand.

Warrior stared at the photograph, slowly shaking his head. “Spent twenty years in prison, and then they came to him and told him, ‘Mandela, if you swear you won’t start no trouble, if you swear to make peace, we’ll let you out.’”

His father continued Warrior’s thought, “And Mandela just looked at ’em and said, ‘No thank you. I come out on my own terms, or I don’t come out at all. Prisoners cannot negotiate.’”

Warrior finished where his father left off. “And then he turned around and walked back into his cell for seven more years.” Warrior’s father nodded solemnly.

Warrior brought his eyes down from the picture. “People always say, ‘That brother was hard.’ But he wasn’t hard, he was strong. There’s a difference. He knew that he was the symbol of a movement. A living martyr for liberation, and his position was non-negotiable. Period. If they broke him, they’d be breaking a whole lot more than a man, they’d be breaking a people. He knew that,” Warrior said.

“He spent twenty-seven years in jail to be free,” said Warrior’s father. “Twenty-seven years,” he said through his tightened jaw.

“That’s the only hope for this country,” Warrior said. “Only a leader with his moral righteousness, a leader who knows the pain of war but also is not afraid of it, can grab the ear a the youth. If someone doesn’t come along who can reach those filled with rage, the invisible walls are gonna crumble, and America’s gonna see the face of what it’s created. The pain’s gonna be brought to their front door, and ain’t no soldiers gonna have the power to stop it. I’m not sayin’ what I think should happen, I’m sayin’ what I think shouldn’t happen, I’m sayin’ what’s gonna happen.”

Warrior’s father responded to his son’s words. “You’ve come up with a angry generation, son. Angry at broken promises, and angry at the situation you found yourselves in. It’s a righteous anger, but it’s gotta be harnessed, directed, or else it’ll take hold a you, and get inside a you like death. And I seen some that ain’t never freed themselves from its grips.” Warrior sat quietly for a few moments, his eyes studying the wooden floors, and then he looked up into his father’s face. “They asked a senator the other day how quickly the violence and bloodshed would end if the children dying were the sons and daughters of senators and congressmen, and he said, ‘It would have ended yesterday.’ So when they say that they want to deal with our anger peacefully, without any bloodshed, what they mean is that they don’t want any of their bloodshed. ’Cause while we been talking, our blood’s been flowing in the streets for years, like a river.” Warrior’s words cut through his father, and he met his son’s eyes with force.

“There must be another path to follow besides making them feel the pain we’ve felt. They can’t never know that kinda pain. We’ve been losing our children for years now. I wouldn’t wish the death of one’s children on my worst enemy. The loss of a child is a bitter pill to swallow. You hear me? A bitter pill.” Warrior’s father spit out the last words.

Warrior slowly dropped his eyes from his father’s. He looked down at his hands and said, “That’s true, Daddy. But when a child ceases to dream ’cause he spends all his time thinkin’ about whether or not he’s gonna die, a fourteen-year old being hopeless, that’s a bitter pill to swallow too.”

After a few moments of silence, Warrior’s father picked up the bass that lay at his feet, and his fingers freed the music. He stared off into space as Warrior now lay down on the couch — the only piece of furniture in the house long enough to hold his frame. Warrior closed his eyes, released the tension in his body, and listened to the soft moan of the bass.

They sat there for hours, listening to the horn of Bird, and the smooth trumpet of Miles. They talked and laughed, telling and retelling history, cloaked as family stories. They told tales they both knew, and argued about the lies. Warrior fell asleep with warmed liquor in his stomach, voices in his head, and the flow of the bass in his ears, his father’s hands still freeing the song.

About the Author

Khary Lazarre-White is a writer, social justice advocate, attorney, and activist who has dedicated his life to the educational outcome and opportunities for young people of color at key life stages. His support base is far-reaching and diverse, built over the past twenty-two years as co-founder and executive director of The Brotherhood/Sister Sol. He has received awards for his work, including the Oprah Winfrey Angel Network Use Your Life Award, the Ford Foundation Leadership for a Changing World Award, awards from Black Girls Rock! and the Andrew Goodman Foundation, and a Resident Fellowship Award to the Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center. Khary Lazarre-White is a highly influential presence among national policymakers and broadcast, print, and social media outlets. He has written for the Huffington Post, NYU Press, Nation Books, and MSNBC.com, and has edited three books, The Brotherhood Speaks, Voices of the Brotherhood/Sister Sol, and Off the Subject. He lives in Harlem, New York City. Passage is his first novel.

This excerpt comes from the novel PASSAGE, published by Seven Stories Press and appears here by permission of the publisher. Copyright © Lazarre-White 2017. All rights reserved.

17 Literary Podcasts to Ease Your Commute

Stuck in bumper to bumper traffic with that same Ed Sheeran song playing on the radio for the hundredth time and giving you earworms for days? Rush hour subway too packed for you to immerse yourself in Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment without a stranger’s elbow obscuring half the page (rude much, fellow commuter)? We have just the solution: literary podcasts! From candid interview with your favorite authors to humorous reviews of romance novels, these audio recordings will ensure that you will have a pleasant and semi-intellectual commute (disclaimer: increased intelligence not guaranteed). So plug in your headphones or blast your speakers, tune out the world and get lost with these 17 audiotastic literary podcasts!

AAWW Radio By Asian American Writers’ Workshop

From the website: “AAWW Radio features curated audio from current and past literary events with authors like Maxine Hong Kingston, Roxane Gay, Amitav Ghosh, and Hanya Yanagihara at the Asian American Writers’ Workshop, a national nonprofit dedicated to the idea that Asian American stories deserve to be told. AAWW has got it all: from avant-garde poetry to post-colonial politics, feminist comics to lyric verse, literary fiction to dispatches from the racial justice left.”

Banging Book Club By Hannah Witton, Lucy Moon, and Leena Norms

Banging Book Club describes its hosts as “the baddest bitches in the sex book genre who want to take you along for the ride.” Every month, they get together to discuss a book on gender and sex from light-hearted book reviews (spoiler-free!) to tackling intersectional feminism and how white women can do better while highlighting the best bits and revealing a bit about their own experiences with all things banging.

Between The Covers by David Naimon

David Naimon hosts Portland-based podcast Between the Covers, engaging in thought-provoking interviews with a wide range of contemporary authors from Pulitzer Prize–winners like Colson Whitehead to emerging novelists like Eunsong Kim. Burning House Press praised David as a host who “engages deeply with each writer’s work and always gives his listeners a new way of thinking about complex issues related to literature, life, and society.”

Book Fight by Tom McAllister, and Mike Ingram

The Book Fight podcast is, in a nutshell, writers talking about books. Books we love. Books we hate. Books that inspire us, baffle us, infuriate us. These are the conversations writers have at the bar, which is to say they’re both unflinchingly honest and open to tangents, misdirection, general silliness. Each episode starts with a particular book, story or essay, chosen either by Tom or Mike or by guests which generally serve as a jumping-off points for larger discussions about writing and reading: craft issues, the ins and outs of publishing, the contemporary lit scene, such as it is.”

Freedom, Books, Flowers & the Moon by the Times Literary Supplement

Hosted by the editors of the Times Literary Supplement and “inspired by Oscar Wilde’s question, “With freedom, books, flowers, and the moon, who could not be happy?” the TLS brings a wide-ranging “esoteric yet solid” weekly podcast on books and ideas.” In the latest episode, the hosts and their guests expounded on everything from “the unrequited love, and painful experiments on frogs, of Prussian polymath Alexander von Humboldt” to “the seething malevolence beneath American ‘niceness’.”

The Guardian Books by Claire Armitstead, Richard Lea, and Sian Cain

Featuring authors like Penelope Lively, Stephen Fry, and Neil Gaiman with topics from “poetry for the mind and gastronomy for the belly” to “the future of literary fiction,” The Guardian Books is a weekly podcast presented by the Guardian book editors who delve into “the world of books, poetry and great writing”. Featuring incisive interviews with prominent writers and thoughtful examinations into contemporary writing themes and movements, this is the book lover’s ideal companion.

KCRW’s Bookworm by Michael Silverblatt

“A must for the serious reader, Bookworm showcases writers of fiction and poetry — the established, new or emerging — all interviewed with insight and precision by the show’s host and guiding spirit, Michael Silverblatt” who provides “intellectual, accessible, and provocative literary conversations.”

Literary Disco by Rider Strong, Julia Pistell, and Tod Goldberg

Hosted by “three good friends who also happen to be huge book nerds,” Rider, Julia, and Tod read books, stories, and essays and engage in heated arguments about them. From nonfiction books about food culture to classic children’s books, no genre is off limits. Hello Giggles called Literary Disco “smart, thoughtful, hilarious, and sometimes ridiculous in the best possible way.”

fiction/non/fiction by Lit Hub

Hosted by writers V.V. Ganeshananthan and Whitney Terrell, fiction/non/fiction “interprets current events through the lens of literature and features conversations with writers of all stripes, from novelists and poets to journalists and essayists.” Episodes feature nuanced and in-depth discussions on wide-ranging contemporary affairs from censorship and the language of immigration to Colin Kaepernick and what it means to take the knee.

Lit Up by Angela Ledgerwood

“Lit Up is a podcast about books, writers and all things literary where no topic is off the table and no conversation is too weird, too personal or too controversial. Angela Ledgerwood goes beyond the book and ask the authors who are sparking the world’s cultural conversations what they’re reading and what they are thinking, and sometimes, the truth about who they really are. Lit Up always provide a candid takes on what’s new and exciting on and off the page.” Recent guests include Jennifer Egan, Salman Rushdie, and Ann Kendrick.

Literary Friction by Carrie Plitt and Octavia Bright

“Literary Friction is a conversation about books and ideas based in London. Each month Carrie Plitt & Octavia Bright interview an author about their book and build the show around a related theme — anything from resistance to corpses to race in British literature. Listen in for lively discussion, book recommendations and a little music too.” Recent authors featured include Karl Ove Knausgård, Sally Rooney & Dana Spiotta.

Minorities in Publishing by Jennifer Baker

Hosted by Electric Lit’s own contributing editor Jennifer Baker, Minorities in Publishing “discusses the lack of diversity in the book publishing industry with publishing professionals, authors and others in the literary scene. In addition to talking about the greater systemic issues of marginalized representation in media, MiP also discuss guests’ personal experiences in their respective field as well as provide information of what to expect as an emerging writer/professional in this business.”

Otherppl by Brad Listi

Otherppl presents “in-depth interviews with today’s leading authors, poets, and screenwriters.” Writer Julia Jackson raved: “Brad Listi’s podcast has made me hit the pause button on my iTunes, blow off social obligations, and sit my ass down in a chair and write. The show is funny, insightful, entertaining, affirming, and, more than anything — inspiring. It easily one of the best podcasts on the web.”

Overdue by Andrew Cunningham and Craig Getting

Is there a large stack of to-be-reads piling up precariously on your bedside table? Do I hear a yes? Then Overdue, a podcast about the books you’ve been meaning to read, is tailored just for you! Every Monday, hosts Andrew and Craig “tackle a new title from their backlog. Classic literature, obscure plays, goofy murder mysteries: they’ll read it all, one overdue book at a time.”

The Paris Review

Journey though an audio odyssey through the life and times of The Paris Review, featuring a phantasmagoric blend of classic stories and poems; interviews with the likes of James Baldwin, Jack Kerouac, and Dorothy Parker; and new work and original readings by the cutting-edge writers of our time.” Episode 10 featured “David Sedaris reading Frank O’Hara, Mary-Louis Parker reading Joy Williams, Dakota Johnson reading Roberto Bolaño, John Ashbery scored by musician Steve Gunn and and The Paris Review’s Southern Editor John Jeremiah Sullivan singing Robert Johnson.”

Reading Women by Kendra Winchester and Autumn Privett

“The phrase ‘women’s literature’ is often associated with fluffy novels about women looking for mates or covers with lipstick and glitter on them. It’s high time that women reclaim the phrase. The goal of the Reading Women podcast is to bring previously anonymous women to the forefront of your TBR stack. Each month Kendra Winchester and Autumn Privett pick a theme and then discuss several books in a book club-style podcast. Listen to Reading Women to discover amazing female authors who are giving voice to a part of the world’s population that has been largely overlooked.”

So Many Damn Books by Christopher Hermelin and Drew Broussard

“Christopher Hermelin and Drew Broussard recognized kindred literary spirits in those snarky-yet-insightful comments they were both posting about books and reading. And then it happened. An idea was born, over cheap beer in a SoHo dive bar. It would be a podcast unlike any other. So Many Damn Books blends the high and the low, the wicked and the divine, the sober and the not-so-sober, the famous and the infamous. Author guests, special drinks, and more book recs than you can shake a stick at — what more could you need?”