The City Where One Wrong Word Can Kill You

Posted on by 007595

Double Take is a literary criticism series in which two readers tackle a highly-anticipated book’s innermost themes, successes, failures, trappings, and surprises. In this edition, Amy Brady and Adam Morgan explore the dark, surreal novel Amatka, by the Swedish master of weird fiction, Karin Tidbeck.

First introduced to English readers by Ann and Jeff VanderMeer (via her short story collection, Jagannath), Karin Tidbeck’s novel Amatka follows an investigator named Vanja who travels to the frigid colony of Amatka, where language — both written and spoken—has immense power. But beneath the city’s peaceful veneer, long-held secrets are beginning to surface that could destroy everything. Amy Brady and Adam Morgan discuss Tidbeck’s unique brand of worldconjuring, her Scandinavian influences, and how successfully she incorporates elements of mystery, surrealism, and poetry.

Amy Brady: When Vanja first arrives at the Amatka colony, I wondered where we were in time and space. In some ways, Amatka is much like our world, but it also differs in significant ways: Amatka is one of only four colonies of human beings in existence (a fifth colony, we learn, was destroyed), and almost every material thing — including furniture, eating utensils, even the buildings themselves — is made out of a strange sludge that takes on whatever shape it’s labeled with. To form a wall, for instance, a member of the colony would point at the sludge, call it a wall, and then write the word WALL on it for good measure. One of Amatka’s biggest collective fears, then, is calling something by the wrong name.

This is a world where language is a source of tremendous power.

What’s fascinating is that compared to some dystopias — say, Gilead in The Handmaid’s Tale — Amatka doesn’t always seem so bad. Yes, on the one hand, women are almost forced to have children, who are then raised independently of their parents. But on the other hand, women are allowed to hold positions of power, no one bats an eye at same-sex relationships, and no one seems to be going hungry, despite their limited resources.

So as the story unfolded and Vanja became increasingly unhappy with what she perceived as limits to her freedom, I found myself wondering: Is escaping the colonies really a better choice? I can’t remember the last time I felt this ambiguous about a dystopian world’s moral framework or its potential for change. And that feels like an exciting shift for the genre.

I can’t remember the last time I felt this ambiguous about a dystopian world’s moral framework or its potential for change.

Adam Morgan: You’re right, Tidbeck’s dystopia isn’t as violent as the ones we’ve become familiar with in popular culture. The horror of Amatka is much quieter — between the lines and behind the scenes — but I could still feel it from the first pages, when Vanja is traveling on a windowless train with no idea what kind of landscape awaits her outside. That quiet evocation of dread hangs in the air throughout the book, and it reminded me of Brian Evenson’s short stories…so much so that I pictured this novel’s librarian, Evgen, as Brian Evenson.

I did wonder if a world where families are forced to sever emotional ties soon after childbirth was an exaggeration of Tidbeck’s native Swedish culture, which really de-emphasizes the role of family in public life, at least compared to the U.S. and the U.K. Amatka’s authoritarian system of government, however—the invisible “committees” issuing orders from a secure tower — struck me as the inverse of Scandinavian egalitarianism, so I can see why a progressive writer in Malmö might find fascism (even well-meaning fascism for the “greater good”) quite disturbing.

As to where we are in time and space, at first I thought Amatka was just a fictional Scandinavian city in some bleak future where parts of the world were slowly being recolonized. And then I thought it was an alien planet. And then I thought it was some kind of O’Neill cylinder in space. By the end of the book, I still wasn’t sure, and while I typically delight in narrative ambiguities, the trail of bread crumbs Tidbeck left us regarding Amatka’s geography (or should I say cosmology?) created an appetite that was never sated.

Perhaps I expected too much from a 200-page novel, though the scope and level of detail here sometimes felt like a short story stretched over too much mycopaper (that’s an Amatkan joke — trust me, it’s hilarious once you’ve read the book).

How did you feel about balance of mystery, suspense, and closure?

AB: The mysteries of what, exactly, the shape-shifting goop is and where it came from delighted me. By telling us so little, Tidbeck created an unnerving tension that snaked through the whole book. I kept wondering: Is the goop alive? Will it exact revenge on the humans who force it into shapes? We never get concrete answers, and I like that choice, because it suggests that the characters might still be in danger, even by the book’s end. A more pat conclusion that explains away the mystery of the goop would have been too heavy-handed for my taste.

But that said, there were other enigmas that felt less connected to the central narrative and left me wanting more satisfactory explanations — the machinery in the tunnels, for example, and the nightly freezing of the lake. Tidbeck describes these things with brilliant detail, but I felt like I was never rewarded for my curiosity.

By telling us so little, Tidbeck created an unnerving tension that snaked through the whole book.

One thing I really loved about the book was its celebration of poetry. I suppose the ending could be interpreted (without giving too much away) as a triumph of poetic language over the prosaic. What did you make of the fact that even in post-apocalyptic Amatka, where resources were limited, poets managed to publish their work? And a follow-up question: If you could make manifest any poem by writing it on a heap of mystery goop, which poem would you choose?

AM: That’s a really good way of putting it: I never felt rewarded for my curiosity. And it’s not that I wanted “answers” to the mysteries in a teleological way (e.g., the finale of LOST), but I did want greater detail and more exploration of the environment, since Tidbeck drops all these hints that there’s more than meets the eye.

In Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation, for instance, even if we ignore the rest of the trilogy, he rewards our curiosity about the tunnel and the crawler by giving us a very detailed encounter before the end of the novel. We don’t get “answers” (who needs those?), but he gives us the experience we’ve been craving since page one: to explore and experience. We never really got to explore or experience Amatka beyond vague impressions, though Tidbeck certainly spark our curiosity.

The poetry metaphor is a good one, given that this book (and Amatka itself) operates on what Kelly Link would call night-time logic, which certainly makes its way into speculative fiction but has always felt poetic to me. I found it really interesting that, as you say, a civilization with only so much paper would preserve poetry, though perhaps that’s another artifact of Tidbeck’s Scandinavian foundation. Poetry, and literature in general, is not the niche leisure market there that it is here in the States, and many Scandinavian writers make a decent living thanks to massive governmental investments in the arts.

I’m wondering too about your thoughts on the end of the book. Without giving anything away, Vanja and Amatka’s fate felt rather deus ex machina to me. While I really enjoyed the narrative threads Tidbeck had woven for the first 150 pages (as well as the form they took), most of them simply dissolved in the last few chapters, like unmarked tubes of toothpaste (last Amatkan joke, I swear).

AB: Your insights into how Amatka’s civilization maps ideologically on to Scandinavia’s are especially interesting in light of the region’s dominance of the 2017 World Press Freedom Index. Of the countries surveyed, Norway tops the list with the most media-related freedoms, followed closely by Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. This is a region that values its freedoms to speak and write, and Amatka, for all its sci-fi and fantasy elements, holds a similar reverence for language. Capital punishment in Amatka, after all, isn’t death — it’s losing the ability to form words.

As an American reading this book, I couldn’t help but think of how our own freedoms of expression are under attack: there’s the administration’s treatment of the press, the possible elimination of the NEA and NEH, and of course the systemic weakening of our country’s humanities and journalism programs. These are not the signs of a nation that values language. Wanna guess where the United States falls on the Index? Forty-three. We’re number 43.

So, what did I make of the ending? I think you’re right — it left a lot of ends loose and twisting in the wind. And that was frustrating. But looked at another way, the story also culminated in a poetic vision that seemed very much in line with the book’s suspicion of literalism. For me, at least, the climactic ending was hard to “see” in a way that the rest of the book wasn’t: The action was blurry, and Vanja’s participation in it was at times hard to decipher. But rather than weakening the story, the vagueness, I felt, reinforced its themes. To paraphrase Emily Dickinson, Tidbeck told all the truth about Amatka in those final moments, but she told it slant.

As an American reading this book, I couldn’t help but think of how our own freedoms of expression are under attack.

The book left me feeling some ambiguity toward Vanja, however. There’s so much to admire about her (especially her bravery), but at times she seemed to be making choices based on her own, nebulous dissatisfaction with life instead of anything rooted in society around her. What did you make of her?

AM: I appreciated Vanja’s agency, particularly after reading so much dystopian fiction where the heroine just gets bounced around from horror to horror. In terms of characterization, though, Tidbeck’s approach reminded me of science fiction writers like Arthur C. Clarke and Kim Stanley Robinson, for whom protagonists often serve as neutral point-of-view vessels. But I don’t mean that as a critique, and here in Amatka (as in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Aurora), Vanja’s aloofness is narratively justified. On some level this is a story about the horrors of emptiness, wordlessness, and formlessness, after all.

In the end, despite the places where my appetite wasn’t quite sated, I think we both really liked this book. It’s a unique reading experience — a sharp, understated glimpse at a terrifying world. The fact that I wanted more is a testament to how fascinated and invested I was in what’s there. I hope Tidbeck’s next book is 100–150 pages longer. Either way, I’ll be reading it.

10 Stories for the Back to School Season

Posted on by 007595

The back-to-school sensation hits many more of us than the returning teachers and students. Suddenly, stores are full of stationary supplies and advertisements are no longer for swimwear and getaways, but uniforms and unnecessary dorm-room decor. For some, the feeling might bring a twinge of nostalgia; for others, the unwelcome knock of memories from the most awkward years.

In the throes of mid-August, we’ve unlocked 10 stories from the Recommended Reading archives that will bring readers back to school without having to enter the building. These stories envision schools of the future and recall the institutions of the past; they sympathize with the adjunct professor, the terrified elementary student, the awkward teen, and the flustered parent. School might be approaching and summer ending, but there’s no reason to stop your pleasure reading. For just $5 a month, members of Electric Literature get access to the complete Recommended Reading archives of over 270 stories — and year-round open submissions. Membership is tax-deductible, helps us pay writers, and keeps all of our new content free. So if you like what you’ve read, please join today!

“Maroon” by Ladi Opaluwa

Recommended by Electric Literature

“You did not hear Pastor James knock,” writes Opaluwa in the opening paragraph of “Maroon.” And so we enter a story, written boldly in the second person, that follows the buildup to a rape we feel will happen — though we can’t, like the unnamed student victim, say exactly how we know this. The young woman’s narrative in “Maroon” sears because it is visceral, but her voice also insists that the story could be yours. It is a reminder that while school can be a safe haven, it can also be a place where we are most vulnerable to abuse of power.

“Tributaries” by Ramona Ausubel

Recommended by Electric Literature

In “Tributaries” love erupts as a new appendage, a “love-arm.” Ausubel investigates this reality through three tragic characters: a husband exhausted by his missing love-arm and the “debts and balances” of his life; his wife who, while young lovers preen each others’ love-arms, must oil her husband’s prosthesis; and their daughter’s teacher who has loved frenetically and suffers from a type of love-induced leprosy.

“Passing Each Other in Halls,” by Matt de la Peña

Recommended by One Teen Story

The story follows the course of one loopy night in Los Angeles, as the narrator and his friend P.J. prowl the streets and the clubs, talking tough but feeling vulnerable, reminiscing about high school and worrying about their prospects after their friends have left them for college. Peña’s narrator is — perhaps secretly — into vulnerability. He’s an aspiring poet, a romantic—who still isn’t confident in his kissing abilities.

“The School” by Donald Barthelme

Recommended by Steven Polansky

In Barthelme’s “The School” the best-laid plans for student enrichment—and a well-meaning teacher’s most earnest ideas—result in a failure and tragedy every time. This is a lesson in and of itself, and yet after all the dead trees and goldfish, even (spoiler!) dead children, perhaps the real lesson is that the children never lose their willingness to try, try again. “To describe it is to sound ridiculous,” writes Polansky in his introduction. “[It’s] a very funny story about death and the negation of meaning, and the only story ever written, by anyone, in which a resurrected gerbil is the bringer of hope.”

“Our Education” by Lincoln Michel

Recommended by Electric Literature

So many of childhood fantasies are, from the perspective of a worry-prone adult, nightmares: running away, becoming an orphan, living in a boxcar. Yet the realities of such disorder eventually trump our desire for it; any kid who has tried to run away knows the feeling of getting half way down the block with a backpack and thinking, in a word, crap. This is the moment in which we find the narrator of Lincoln Michel’s tale of scholastic anarchy. He is trapped in a school from which the teachers have all disappeared, but in his case, there is no option to break the fantasy, to go home.

“Reading In The Schools” by Hannah Rahimi

Original fiction, recommended by Electric Literature

This is the story of Abby who, in the midst of a divorce and recently relocated back to her parents’ home, is casting about for a sense of purpose. She lands as a Reader in the Schools, tasked with reading to a small child for an hour each week. It is a task that she is perhaps unqualified for — not because she lacks the requisite literacy, but rather because she’s in what she terms “a funny phase” in life — and she soon finds herself outmatched by the wonderfully prickly, seven-year-old Magda.

“Nadia” by Brit Bennett

Recommended by Angela Flournoy, excerpted from the novel THE MOTHERS

“Nadia” is a story about the ways that grief can send you reeling, and how the people we meet during grief’s bleakest moments can feel like the antidote to our pain, a solution to the unsolvable problem of loss. Shortly after a visit to a strip club while bunking off school, Nadia runs into Luke. “He didn’t treat her like everyone else at school, who either sidestepped her or spoke to her like she was some fragile thing one harsh word away from breaking,” writes Bennett. As Nadia works through the loss of her mother, she finds solace with an unexpected partner.

“All the Keys to All the Doors” by Clare Beams

Recommended by Megan Mayhew Bergman

Beams tells of the aging Cele, a benefactor and an unofficial elderwoman of a rather perfect town that is brought to a halt after a tragedy at the local school — the heart of Cele’s idyllic world. “All the Keys to All the Doors,” writes Bergman, reaches out to contemporary pain and asks a devastating and universal question: What is it like to “live with unlivable things”?

“Wait Till You See Me Dance” by Deb Olin Unferth

Recommended by Rebecca Schiff

Unferth, writes Rebecca Schiff is “a sentence-level dazzler who knows how to tell a story.” In this piece and in typical Unferthian style, an adjunct professor keeps repeating to her English 99 class that their final “will be graded by outside sources,” a phrase that absolves her of responsibility. Yet, she confides in the reader: “These outside sources were supposed to be mysterious, were maybe not even people…” In Unferth’s work, suspense grows out of sentences. Being playful on the page can be a matter of life and death.

“The Great Disaster” by Alanna Schubach

Original fiction recommended by Electric Literature

“The Great Disaster” unfolds through the eyes of a group of school children in a small American town after a large flood has struck their valley, bringing chaos and destruction and leaving behind dead bodies, mud, and mold. The children are too young to grasp the political, economic, and geographic implications of the tragedy, and yet they are just young enough to understand, viscerally, it’s philosophical and spiritual consequences. In this way, Schubach creates the perfect narrators for an intimate reading of a global event.

About Recommended Reading

Recommended Reading is the weekly fiction magazine of Electric Literature, publishing here every Wednesday morning. In addition to featuring our own recommendations of original, previously unpublished fiction, we invite established authors, indie presses, and literary magazines to recommend great work from their pages, past and present. The Recommended Reading Commuter, which publishes every Monday, is our home for flash and graphic narrative, and poetry. For access to year-round submissions, join our membership program on Drip, and follow Recommended Reading on Medium to get every issue straight to your feed. RecommendedReading is supported by the Amazon Literary Partnership, the New York State Council on the Arts, and the National Endowment for the Arts. For other links from Electric Literature, follow us, or sign up for our eNewsletter.

Indie Bookstore Demonstrates How to Deal With the Alt-Right

Posted on by 007595

Bluestockings is a feminist bookstore, cafe, and activist center in New York City—basically, a gathering place for progressive ideals. So it’s probably no surprise that it would be targeted by alt-right types. Fortunately, the vandalism was more ideological than physical: attempting to sneak copies of a white supremacist memoir onto the shelves.

As usual for a group whose main tenet is “everyone’s fucking me over but me,” the intentions of this…protest?…are a little muddy. Were they trying to impugn Bluestockings? To help Yiannopoulos’ real book sales match his fantasy ones? Eh, who literally ever knows. But in any event, Bluestockings’ response, both in the moment and on Facebook, is a model for how businesses and organizations can commit to dealing with people who espouse white supremacy in the name of (their understanding of) free speech.

It could even work for individuals. “Uncle George, Thanksgiving is open to people who ascribe to a range of ideologies; however, there is no room for alt-right propaganda or the endorsement of white supremacists’ views in our space.” It has a nice ring, don’t you think?

The Life Magazine Reporter and the Nazi-Hunting Spy

Posted on by 007595

In June of 1956, Life magazine published a themed issue proclaiming the “Air Age.” It featured stunt pilots, military maneuvers and new world records; reporters rode along in the latest chrome aircraft. Terry Turner was a fresh face at the weekly’s Manhattan headquarters, straight out of Northwestern’s School of Journalism and just starting a family with new wife Leanne. She came from Green Bay, where her father managed a department store and belonged to the Packers’ front office. Terry came from the family farm in Powell, Wyoming. His father later decamped to San Diego, but Powell today looks much as it did in the ’50s. Its most prominent institutions are the county fair office, a meat processing plant and a dealer of exclusively American cars. There’s an RV garage, and of course a cemetery. The shops do brisk business in cowlick, coal, and gluten-free oats. Its churches host a couple of the more zealous sects, and the same proprietress has run the same drive-in since 1949. Her name is Pokey, and against her husband’s wishes, she’s gone digital.

When Terry began at Life, the magazine was enjoying some of its greatest success. Capitalizing on the potential of photojournalism, its glossy pages had already held work by Dorothea Lange and Henri Cartier-Bresson, illustrations by Norman Rockwell and prose from Dorothy Parker. Now it ran photo-essays by Gordon Parks and stories from Ernest Hemingway. In 1955, it published the serialized memoirs of Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur. But if it weren’t for the era’s ads and selection of celebrity portraits, the magazine’s subjects then might blend in with today’s news: lethal violence against young Black men; debates about security versus civil liberties; refugees, pipelines, robots, the Oscars. Still, there are Peron and Nasser, Brando and Garbo — and some of my favorites: Anna Magnani in her ever-rumpled slip, the Dodgers’ move to Los Angeles and soon, revolution in Cuba.

One thing is conspicuously missing from the 1950s coverage: post-Holocaust justice. After the Nuremberg trials of 1946, the magazine’s last article on German reconstruction had appeared the following year. The vanguard of the master race weren’t as photogenic as Sugar Ray Robinson or even Sputnik, but with many war criminals still at large, their absence from a decade’s worth of news is unnerving. Pressure built over that time, and June of 1956 became a tipping point in the pursuit of Nazi war criminals.

One thing is conspicuously missing from Life’s 1950s coverage: post-Holocaust justice.

That month, a letter of special commendation arrived at the U.S. Counter Intelligence Corps headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. Dale Johnson was serving his two-year deployment with the Army’s 66th Military Intelligence Brigade; he’d arrived at Wallace Barracks the previous year after training at Fort Holabird in Baltimore. Dale had enlisted straight out of college in Nebraska, where he majored in education. He’d grown up in Lincoln, where his father was a mail carrier and his mother developed film at a camera store in town. In Stuttgart, Dale’s small investigative unit conducted a classified research mission “which led to successful resolution in the capture of highly valued individuals,” according to headquarters’ letter. At the time, the investigators themselves couldn’t know exactly whom the authorities had arrested from among their queries. With the operation ongoing, the press and the public could know even less.

For Germans, the needs for justice on one hand and reconstruction on the other were at odds for some years following the war. Many war criminals remained in West Germany undetected; some even entered the civil service under altered identities. Others with strategic skills joined the U.S. Cold War effort under Operation Paperclip. At the time, German authorities also lacked a satisfactory way to prosecute the offenders they managed to locate. The Allies had run the Nuremberg trials, the U.S. the Dachau trials, Poland the Auschwitz set of 1947. But Germany tried perpetrators in its domestic court system, where murder was narrowly defined and in this context, difficult to prove. The prosecution had to demonstrate that the killer had acted on personal initiative, and the defense almost always won with a claim of befehlnotstand (“following orders”). Hannah Arendt’s later conceptualization of evil’s banality had little traction in Germany then, where the public held to an image of war criminals as virulently racist sadists and not the rank and file.

From Bieber to Embalming and Back Again

Spring of 1956 saw the investigation of a former SS officer who’d been involved in mass executions on Germany’s border with Lithuania. He was, of course, “following orders,” but through an alignment of factors his case had begun to attract notice from Jewish groups, occupying forces and fellow West Germans. In June, the region’s lead prosecutor sent a memo known as the Stuttgart Directive to other area officials, essentially stating that the buck would stop there. Finally, the German legal system began to examine war crimes as acts of methodical genocide (the warrant for Adolf Eichmann’s arrest dates to this juncture). A collaborative investigation was in order: the U.S. held millions of captured Nazi documents. The project revealed the Lithuania-area officer as part of an SS team that had killed 5000 people within a small border region in the summer of 1941. German prosecutors tried the group’s ten most horrific offenders, and got an unprecedented ten convictions, albeit with lighter sentences than hoped. Struck by the case, journalists called for increased accountability. The West German government responded by creating a central war crimes office in 1958, and soon lifted the statute of limitations. The Frankfurt-Auschwitz trials would follow.

Nazi war crimes returned to the pages of Life, with articles on Hitler’s last hours and The Diary of Anne Frank. In June of 1960, Israeli agents arrested Adolf Eichmann in Argentina. By the time the magazine printed Eichmann’s confession later that year, young Terry Turner had moved to Denver to head Life’s regional bureau. His family, now with two little boys, joined a Baptist church, where Terry became a deacon. He was close in age to the new associate pastor, Dale Johnson, who had attended seminary in California after his time in the military. Dale described his Army stint as transformative, but kept tight lips about the work he’d done in Stuttgart, even as the two became friends.

The international hunt for war criminals could hardly have seemed further away from Terry’s post that fall. He may have been ascending the ranks, but even the magazine’s contemporaneous cover stories on Jimmy Hoffa and Kim Novak were remote from the regional fare: school football in Kansas, an especially long cattle drive in Nebraska, the vagaries of mining town life in Montana.

Occasionally though, there was opportunity for adventure. The “Air Age” issue had been indicative of a cultural obsession: from the 1940s to the 1960s, the magazine contained a feature on aviation in almost every issue. Few of these inspire confidence; the vast majority of the stories from the ’50s are about all manner of spectacular accidents. “Crash,” “ordeal” and “tragedy” are the words that crop up most (with “disaster,” “peril” and “horror” close behind). Yet the unquenchable optimism around all things aerodynamic appears to have equaled only Cold War paranoia for reliable journalistic themes in those days. Commerce, engineering, defense and recreation, all rolled into winged vessels, proved irresistible for politicians, advertisers and the collective imagination. Seaplanes! Ramjets! Astrochimps! The potential seemed endless, even as beloved rock stars and entire sports teams joined the toll along with occupants of crash sites: a Brooklyn neighborhood, a convent full of nuns, a small town that got hit three times within as many years.

Commerce, engineering, defense and recreation, all rolled into winged vessels, proved irresistible for politicians, advertisers and the collective imagination.

On the job that winter, Terry gamely rode along to Mexico with a group of Wyoming flyers. But his particular pilot didn’t quite make it back. Instead, their two-seater went down in the Wyoming wilderness, killing both men on impact. The week before, the magazine had carried two pieces on the need for improving air safety. The week after, it ran his obituary. He was 29. Celebrated U.N. chief Dag Hammarskjold was on the cover — soon to die in a plane crash as well — and Eichmann’s trial began a month later. By then, gentle Dale was busy bringing aid to the young widow and her children. The following summer Dale Johnson and Leanne Turner married, and when the church moved Dale to Wyoming, the four made the transition together.

After more children, foster-children and their reassignment to California, the Johnsons’ eldest son would move back to Denver and return with a child of his own. She’d grow accustomed to hearing “Home on the Range” and “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” as lullabies, and when interviewing the retired Reverend for a family history project in grade school, would be more concerned with the dramaturgy of the video than the details of his time in Germany. Wasn’t every grandpa a Nazi-hunting spy? He made award-winning cookies.

11 Books That Will Transport You to the NYC Demimonde

Posted on by 007595

Most people have a dream epoch, a bygone era that they venerate and romanticize, thinking, if only I’d been around for that. My pedestaled place on the space/time continuum was always New York City in the mid-1970s and early 1980s, a time I was much too young to experience, but which captured my imagination via books, films, and music. New York City was gritty then; often, it was just dangerous, and elected officials didn’t seem to care, as evidenced when Mayor Abe Beame famously asked President Ford for federal funds to save the city from bankruptcy: FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD, newspaper headlines screeched. Against this backdrop, a creative demimonde flourished. Unlike today’s New York City, one could still move there to be an artist, not just look like an artist while spending all of one’s time working to pay the rent. But romance isn’t reality — it’s the gloss, the selected parts a scrim to project one’s desires or salve one’s feelings of inadequacy. The art seemed accessible to me, because it wasn’t academic, and the glamor was piss-elegant. The artists I admired reflected the roughness of the city around them, and as I recount in my new book, Girls Gone Old, when I moved to New York City, I sought out what remained of that roughness. Perhaps it was because of their art that I was never afraid.

The following is a list of 11 books that recall the subterranean art world of New York City in the 1970s and ‘80s.

Support Electric Lit: Become a Member!

1. Valerie Solanas: The Defiant Life of the Woman Who Wrote SCUM / Breanne Fahs

Best known for her attempted assassination of Andy Warhol, Valerie Solanas was first and foremost a writer. Living in a series of cheap motel rooms, government subsidized apartments, and on the street, Solanas hung out at the 11th St. Blimpie’s, and supported herself and her writing through panhandling and prostitution. Fahs’ excellent biography details Solanas’ life after her release from the hospital where she spent three years following the Warhol shooting; her quarrels with the 1970s feminists who she felt were trying to exploit her; her writings for the small presses; and her dedication to publishing a proper version of her SCUM Manifesto.

2. Captured: A Film & Video History of the Lower East Side / Clayton Patterson

In the introduction to Captured Clayton Patterson writes, “One of the challenges of this book was to give a history to people who had not received the recognition they had earned…People who were in everything, but remembered in nothing.” Patterson surmounts the challenge — Captured is a phone-book sized tome. Over sixty contributors reflect on the vagaries of low-budget, no-budget filmmaking in New York City. “It’s not that I can sit here and define mainstream for you,” artist Jeffrey Lerer says, “but I know what it isn’t. Here’s what happens. I do this…They come and say, “If you’re willing to tilt this four degrees, we’ll back you.”

3. Bad Reputation / Penny Arcade

In Bad Reputation Penny Arcade tells of a conversation she had with photographer Nan Goldin after both women were invited to speak on panel about transgressive art. “By the way, what is transgressive art?” Goldin asked. “Transgressive art,” Arcade replied, “is what academics call what you and I call real life.” Bad Reputation is a collection of interviews, plays, and performance pieces documenting Arcade’s 40 plus years as a downtown provocateur. “The ’60s were spear-headed by a working-class entrepreneurial bunch of artists — Warhol, John Vaccaro, Jack Smith,” Arcade says. “But after The Talking Heads, people were going to art school, and I found it very hard to make my way.”

4. My Face for the World to See / Candy Darling

In the early 1960s, Bette Davis famously placed an ad in a Hollywood trade paper, “Thirty years acting experience…Wants steady employment in Hollywood.” Candy Darling made a mock-up of what may have been her own version of Davis’s ad: “Once popular off off Broadway and Underground Star seeks work.” Only 29 at the time of her death, the transgender actress never found the mainstream acceptance she yearned for after starring roles in the Andy Warhol films, Women in Revolt and Flesh. My Face for the World to See is an amalgamation of journal entries, notes, and photographs. “As a girl you are entitled to certain hopes, certain needs. You have a right to expect that there will be a special place for you. These feelings are luxuries to me,” Darling wrote.

5. Airless Spaces / Shulamith Firestone

In 1970, Shulamith Firestone wrote the groundbreaking feminist treatise, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. It would be almost thirty years before the publication of her next and final book, Airless Spaces. A collection of short, haunting essays bridging Firestone’s experiences in the years in-between, it is divided into five sections: HOSPITAL, POST-HOSPITAL, LOSERS, OBITS, and SUICIDES I HAVE KNOWN. After attending Firestone’s funeral, Susan Faludi wrote in The New Yorker, “It was hard to say which moment the mourners were there to mark: the passing of Firestone or that of a whole generation of feminists who had been unable to thrive in the world they had done so much to create.”

Literature’s Great Alternative Families

6. Edgewise: A Picture of Cookie Mueller / Chloe Griffin

In her own essays and stories, fun and madness seemed to envelop writer and actress Cookie Mueller’s life like a cloak. Edgewise: A Picture of Cookie Mueller is the oral history of Mueller’s life, told through interviews with people who knew her. Driven and ambitious, she supplemented her art world earnings by dealing drugs out of her Bleecker St. apartment, and go-go dancing. After a long term relationship with a woman, she met her husband in Italy; they were both HIV-positive. Edgewise fleshes out the portrait of a woman who seemed to want the world to remember her laughing. Chris Kraus recalls the struggle Mueller faced getting her book Walking Through Clear Water on A Pool Painted Black published: “Everybody adored Cookie, but when push came to shove, all these agents and editors said, ‘Well, you could rewrite it this way, we want to see this.’ Nobody wanted to just publish the book the way she wrote it.” A friend details the anguish Cookie felt as an artist, forced to confront her weakening. “When she was still healthy, when she could still talk, she said, ‘I’m losing my physical ability — you know how I’m a physical person. I’m not going to be able to walk…I’m not going to be able to talk, and I’m a communicator, I’m a writer.’”

7. Fire in the Belly: The Life and Times of David Wojnarowicz / Cynthia Carr

“The feeling of the new art is fugitive…here for the moment, gone forever. It’s only truly valuable before it’s surrounded by the mystique of money, while it’s still owned by the culture,” poet Rene Ricard wrote in 1982. David Wojnarowicz’s early art was truly “fugitive”: working with spray paint, he utilized the walls of the ruined, destined to be demolished West Side Piers as a canvas. Carr, a Wojnarowicz confidante and long-time writer for the Village Voice, details David’s life in a New York City on the cusp of gentrification — gentrification brought in part by the outside world’s interest in the downtown art scene where he made his name. “David once told me that he used to long for acceptance from other people. Then he began to value the way he didn’t fit in. He realized that this uneasiness with the world was where his work came from,” Carr writes. Fire in the Belly is the definitive biography of a man whose first memory was the sound of a police siren; it’s also a requiem for a generation of New York City artists lost to AIDS.

8. The Piers / Alvin Baltrop

Alvin Baltrop worked odd jobs — as a street vendor, a jewelry designer, a printer, and a taxi driver. The Piers is an evocative and unforgettable book of his photographs documenting the decadent lost world of art and anonymous sex that co-mingled at the crumbing West Side Piers. Baltrop struggled against the racism of the white art world, and his photographs remained largely unseen until after his death. If one is not aware of the sexual abandonment that existed alongside the ruin of the West Side Piers, Baltrop’s photos can provoke awe: they’re like looking in at a bacchanal at the end of the world. Baltrop’s pictures also carry a brutal, spooky sadness: the freedom felt by many gay men at the Piers would be fleeting, due to the ravages brought by AIDS.

9. I Dreamed I Was a Very Clean Tramp / Richard Hell

“I got to live the ideal I’d had in mind when I came to New York to be a poet — to have a well placed platform for saying things to the world, and an audience that thrived on it and wanted to have sex with me because of it, and I ran my own life and had no boss. And there were drugs and money,” Richard Hell writes, giving name to the dream at the heart of his book I Dreamed I Was a Very Clean Tramp. The charismatic, handsome front man had a considerable and often overlooked influence on the aesthetic stylings of punk. Hell rejects the typical biographic structure, opting to tell his story in sometimes dizzying lyrical fragments. Much was offered to Hell creatively in the 1970s and ‘80s, and he comes across as satisfied with how he squandered some of those offerings. His years of drug addiction were “hopelessness, depravity and fun,” and “a downfall…I embraced.” Some of his most colorful reminisces involve women. Cookie Mueller was “non-judgmental. She had a lot of respect for criminals;” Nan Goldin “lived and worked in the gay and wild-kids art gutter.” “Defeat was more true to existence than illusionary ‘success,’” Hell writes.

10. Totem of the Depraved / Nick Zedd

In his memoir, Totem of the Depraved, underground filmmaker Nick Zedd writes, “As I watch the roaches crawling on my bed, I’m wondering when I’ll have enough money to finish the film I started over a year ago. That it should take me a year to finish a 10 minute film due to lack of cash bespeaks the ignorance of a world which would vomit out diseased fungus like Blue Velvet.” In the face of much economic adversity, Zedd remains dedicated to his art. Landlords are his primary enemy; fellow filmmakers and apathetic journalists make up a secondary tier. Throughout the book, it’s his relationships with willing females that save him from the streets. (He refers to his “seduction” of women as “a survival strategy.”) “I discovered that being an underground filmmaker makes me less than nothing. With the world so corroded by an entertainment industry that is so restrictive and reactionary… I feel no more influential than a homeless person asleep in front of the White House,” Zedd writes.

11. Wait For Me At the Bottom of the Pool: The Writings of Jack Smith / edited by J. Hoberman and Edward Leffingwell

In a letter to a German film school, Smith wrote, “My films are not conceptual or art-school cutie-pie; they have the broadest appeal (as did Art before the silver-spray democracy of the schools.)” A collection of scripts, letters, essays, and interviews, Wait For Me offers insight into the notoriously prickly, yet highly influential underground filmmaker and performance artist. Smith had his own language — rife with repetitive adjectives (“moldy,” “pasty,”) and avatars (tortured penguins, pigs, lobsters) used as ciphers for deeper feelings. “Do you ever worry about a particular subtlety in your films not being understood?” Smith was asked in an interview. “How can you not…understand the movements and gestures?” Smith replied, before adding, “The appeal is not to the understanding, anyway.”

About the Author

Fiona Helmsley is the author of the new essay collection, Girls Gone Old. Her writing can be found (or is forthcoming) in various anthologies like Ladyland and The Best Sex Writing of the Year and online at websites like The Weeklings, Jezebel, The Hairpin, Hazlitt and The Rumpus. A multiple Pushcart nominee, her book of essays and stories, My Body Would be the Kindest of Strangers, was released in 2015.

Finally, You Can Buy Audiobooks for Your Dog

Posted on by 007595

Plus, the ACLU will defend Milo Yiannopoulos’ right to free speech and ‘Dawn’ and ‘Neuromancer’ are coming to TV

The weekend is looking up for pups, sci-fi fans, and Milo Yiannopoulos. (Two out of three ain’t bad.) Audible for Dogs’ catered selection of titles promises to calm antsy and sad dogs left at home by owners, the ACLU has filed a lawsuit in defense of Yiannopoulos’ right to advertise his book on the DC metro, and Octavia Butler’s Dawn and William Gibson’s Neuromancer will be coming to small screens near you.

Audible and Cesar Millan release dog-friendly audiobooks

Do you have a stressed pupper, or just one that’s always wanted to finish Pride and Prejudice? Thankfully, Amazon has devised a way to ease the minds of our furry friends while their owners are out of the house. Dubbed Audible for Dogs, the service has a rotating selection of titles sure to keep dogs engaged and combat loneliness. The company conducted research on 100 dogs in partnership with infamous dog whisperer Cesar Millan and his Dog Psychology Center in Santa Clarita, California, discovering that 76% of participating owners observed that their dogs relaxed with audiobooks. Among the curated titles are classics such as Huckleberry Finn so your fluffy pal can contemplate life outside the crate; Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime: Stories from a South African Childhood to bring your pooch up to speed on racial tensions; and W. Bruce Cameron’s A Dog’s Purpose to calm (or perhaps trigger) your pup’s existential crisis. Heckin’ great.

[Mental Floss/Kirstin Fawcett]

The ACLU files lawsuit for Yiannopoulos’ right to free speech

A plot twist has arisen in the never-ending saga regarding professional whiny gadfly/white supremacist Milo Yiannopoulos’ book. This week, he got some support from what might seem like an unlikely corner: the American Civil Liberties Union, usually not a fan of hate speech. Just last month, the former Breitbart editor’s self-published memoir, Dangerous, was released amidst criticism and scathing reviews. Yiannopoulos filed a lawsuit shortly thereafter against publishing powerhouse Simon & Schuster for dropping his book, claiming defamation. And now, yet another lawsuit has been filed — this time, on behalf of Yiannopoulos, by the ACLU. The civil rights organization has accused the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority of violating the white nationalist’s right to free speech by refusing to let him promote his book on the metro. This prohibition stems from the WMATA guidelines, which forbid ads that are “intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying opinions.” Yiannopoulos isn’t the only client the ACLU is representing; abortion and birth control provider Carafem and the animal advocacy group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are also being represented in the lawsuit. Though the ACLU has stated that the organization is against many of the values Milo espouses, it says it is adamant about the preservation of the First Amendment. (Unlike many entities that get to decide whether they take money for ad space based on any criteria they fancy, WMATA is actually a government organization.)

[HuffPost/Curtis M. Wong]

Octavia Butler’s ‘Dawn’ and William Gibson’s ‘Neuromancer’ are coming to small screens

Two new sci-fi adaptations are on the horizon! Ava DuVernay’s new project, alongside Charles D. King and Victoria Mahoney, will bring Octavia Butler’s novel Dawn to television. The project will bring to life the story of Lilith, an African-American woman who works with aliens to resurrect the human race 250 years after nuclear war. Although the TV rights were optioned in 2015, the adaptation fell through. Dawn is the first in Butler’s Lilith’s Brood trilogy; there’s no word yet on whether the series will continue into later books, or for that matter how the show will handle the novel’s copious amounts of alien-human sex. Also coming to small screens is an adaptation of William Gibson’s sci-fi novel, Neuromancer. Deadpool director Tim Miller has signed with Fox to lead this project, with X-Men franchise architect Simon Kinberg set to produce. Neuromancer is a cyberpunk classic that follows a former hacker hunting a rogue AI through the novel’s virtual world, “the Matrix.” (Yes, but Neuromancer did it first.) Like Dawn, the project has been a target for adaptation before, but previous attempts failed. Hopefully now people are hungrier for visions of any future besides the one we’re currently facing.

[Variety/Erin Nyren]

Stop Using Autistic Characters as Plot Devices

Posted on by 007595

In the middle of my 8th-grade year, I somehow found time in my busy schedule of academic excellence, teen angst, increasing social isolation, and constant overwhelmed meltdowns to watch a 1993 drama called House of Cards.

The film starred Kathleen Turner as the mother of Sally, a young girl who stopped speaking after her father died and started building intricate playing card houses around herself. Tommy Lee Jones played some sort of expert who showed up to diagnose Sally with autism and lend support as Turner valiantly fought this wretched affliction and tried to reach her child. It was terrible, pandering shlock, full of pathos introduced with all of the subtlety of someone sweetening their coffee with an unscrewed sugar dispenser.

As a budding film snob, I loathed it. As a confused and isolated girl who was starting to worry that she’d never figure out how to understand other people, though, I was enthralled. House of Cards wasn’t intended for people who identified with Sally; it had been crafted to appeal to those who wanted to cry over the misfortune of people who weren’t like them. But I imposed my own fears and dreams onto it, and I crafted my own image of autism out of it. “I wish I was autistic,” I whined to my parents, my one friend, and anyone else who would listen. “Because then people wouldn’t expect so much of me.”

Thirteen years later, my prayers were answered, Saint Teresa of Avila-style, when I was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Thirteen years and a day later, I learned that whatever vision I’d had of a diagnosis inspiring empathy and compassion and occasional indulgence from those around me was — much like House of Cards and Rain Man and every portrayal of autism I’d grown up watching — a work of fiction.

“You start pretty much from scratch when you work with an autistic child,” Ivar Lovaas, the clinical psychologist who founded Applied Behavior Analysis, told Psychology Today in 1974. (Science writer Steve Silberman quotes the interview in his book NeuroTribes, which you can read for more background on what passed for autism research in the ‘70s.) “You have a person in the physical sense — they have hair, a nose, and a mouth — but they are not people in the psychological sense. One way to look at the job of helping autistic kids is to see it as a matter of constructing a person. You have the raw materials, but you have to build the person.”

This idea of the autistic as a mere body, as cumbersome raw material that someone else must shape into a semblance of personhood, permeates every facet of autistic existence. It’s in the studies about us, baked into the hypotheses and methods of non-autistic scientists, who start by putting subjects through batteries of invasive tests instead of asking them questions. (Approximately 75% of us can talk and all of us can communicate in some form.) It’s in the media about us; journalists interview parents and experts, but rarely quote an autistic person on the subject of their own lives. It’s in our treatments, where children undergoing “applied behavior analysis” are subjected to up to 40 hours of training, akin to dog training, every week. It’s in the charities that appoint themselves our spokespeople and portray autism as a vengeful demon that possess us and ravages our families. “I’m visible in your children, but if I can help it, I am invisible to you until it’s too late,” a disembodied voice that identifies itself as Autism intones in “I Am Autism,” a 2009 promotional video for Autism Speaks. The autistic child is somehow a vessel for autism, a shell.

So it’s hardly a surprise — even if it is a constant disappointment — that the art and entertainment about us follows this philosophy. Our empty shells become the blank canvas or blank page. Our raw materials become the fodder for non-autistic creators who piece together characters based on our most noticeable and most stereotyped behaviors, or on a fiction — like the one I grew up with — of what autism means. If we have no internal lives, then artists are free to make them for us, or to use us as tools for providing depth and motivation to the non-autistic characters, the real ones. If we aren’t people in the psychological sense, then obviously we’re not part of the thinking, judging, listening audience. We can be objects in a non-autistic character’s journey, or we can be the projection of a non-autistic’s fears, but we couldn’t possibly be heroes. We couldn’t be viewers or readers. And we certainly couldn’t be artists ourselves with our own stories to tell.

We can be objects in a non-autistic character’s journey, or we can be the projection of a non-autistic’s fears, but we couldn’t possibly be heroes.

Almost three decades after Rain Man, narratives about autistic people remain dominated by non-autistic writers, directors, and actors. The ostensible visionaries who make these works, who are able to imagine autistic people as math savant assassins or savant doctors, never seem to have quite enough imagination to envision us as producers or consumers. While autistic novelists exist and are publishing work that speaks to their real lives, the books about autistic or autistic-coded protagonists that receive the most attention are those like Ginny Moon and The Rosie Project: books by non-autistic writers that either imagine or parody the autistic experience. The Accountant, the 2016 action film that starred Ben Affleck as a brilliant but awkward autistic accountant/assassin, consulted Autism Speaks while making the film, but did not employ any autistic creatives. Presumably the same will go for its sequel, which was recently greenlit. Atypical, the new Netflix dramedy about an 18-year-old autistic boy who decides that he wants to try dating, followed this pattern as well. Autistic performers were considered for the lead role, but it eventually went to non-autistic actor Keir Gilchrist. The show’s Twitter account claims that one of the other actors in the show and a member of their social media team are on the spectrum, but the people most directly involved in creating the narrative and bringing it to the screen are only guessing about its main character’s internal life. The Good Doctor, a drama about a young autistic savant working as a surgeon that premieres this fall on ABC, appears to have even less autistic involvement.

At least a portion of this work is likely being produced with good intentions, but without our input or even a respect for the fact that we might have our own stories, the bulk of it is everything that Lovaas and so many other experts and armchair experts have said that we are: empty, soulless, and lacking in empathy.

For the careless or the self-serving writer, an autistic character is nothing more than a writing exercise or a thought experiment. It can be a way for someone to demonstrate how visionary they are by assuming the voice of a character who is supposed to be voiceless (which is sort of the esthetic equivalent of setting up a charity for autistic children, failing to appoint any autistic people to leadership positions for the majority of your existence, and having the gall to call it Autism Speaks). Or it can be a way to demonstrate how clever they are by mimicking the by mimicking the tics and stereotypes that they’ve witnessed — or maybe even studied with the help with a non-autistic expert in the field — and shaping them into quirky prose and whimsically-placed diagrams. Even characters in good books by good writers, like Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time and Jennifer Egan’s A Visit From the Goon Squad, can sometimes feel more like a collection of symptoms and behaviors — a thought in pictures, a repetitive tic, a missed social cue — than a person.

It’s not just outdated beliefs about our internal lives or lack thereof that limit and distort autism-related narratives, though. Preconceptions about our place in the world are perhaps even more disheartening and disturbing. In life, we are often discussed in terms of the imposition our existence places on others. We are a burden to our parents, the cause of so many divorces, and a drain on education and health systems. When empathy is present in news stories or nonfiction essays about us, it is for the people who love us and must deal with us — even when they kill us.

In art, this concept of the autistic person as something that happens to someone turns us into objects, plot devices, catalysts at best. The heroes of stories that are ostensibly about us are instead the people around us, who are given humanity and character development at our expense. It’s an idea that can trip up even the most empathetic creators — “I Am Autism” was directed by Gravity and Children of Men filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón. And it’s the driving concept behind even some of the most beloved work about autism. Rain Man isn’t really about Dustin Hoffman’s Raymond; it’s about his brother Charlie’s journey and how Raymond makes him feel. The 2015 romantic dramedy Jane Wants A Boyfriend, which was somewhat lauded for its take on a woman with Asperger’s looking for romance, is truly about Jane’s sister’s journey as she struggles to deal with Jane. Atypical is at least partially Sam’s story, but it’s also about how his autism affects his family. Our characters exist to make their characters feel something. And our stories exist to make audiences who identify with those non-autistic characters feel amused, entertained, or inspired.

Our characters exist to make their characters feel something.

There’s a glaring contrast between these works and a pair of young adult novels by autistic authors that I recently had the pleasure of reading. In both The State of Grace, by Rachael Lucas, and On The Edge of Gone, by Corrine Duyvis, autism is not a quirk or a hook but a living, breathing part of the worlds the writers have created. Lucas and Duyvis’ autistic characters have some of the outward symptoms and habits that non-autistic creators latch onto, but these inform the plot and meld with the characters’ rich inner lives. Their autistic characters navigate their own stories, forming more complex portraits of the autistic as a person in both the physical and psychological sense. These books aren’t just better representation. They’re simply more interesting than anything a non-autistic has envisioned so far.

I don’t believe that non-autistic people shouldn’t write about us at all, but I’ve yet to find much evidence that they can. Taking on characters and experiences outside of your own is supposed to be one of the great, mind-expanding purposes of the artistic process, and yet so much of what I see and read about autism feels limited and limiting. It’s a exercise that’s about as creative and mature as a confused, petulant teenager watching a bad film in the ’90s, figuring that she now knew everything about being autistic, and concluding that having this condition would somehow magically solve all of her problems.

There’s nothing bold, brave, clever or inspiring about accepting commonly-held beliefs about us at face value and perpetuating them. There’s nothing groundbreaking about using us as objects to satisfy a the creative urges of a writer and the demands of an audience that doesn’t want to be challenged. There’s nothing remotely humanizing about an entire subgenre about a certain type of person that’s made without any participation from those people at all.

Autism can be isolating, but it’s even more isolating to watch these hollow plot contrivances made in the images of people like me be used solely for the entertainment of people who aren’t. It’s also frustrating, because it doesn’t have to be that way. I understand the power of art to open people’s minds and stoke empathy for people outside of your worldview — after all, as someone who isn’t naturally good at acting “normal,” I’ve always used books, television, and movies to help me understand non-autistic people’s perspectives and motivations. I’m ready for the world to return the favor and eager for other people to benefit from that experience as much as I have.

I want non-autistic writers to ask themselves what their motivation is when they decide to write about us. Is it a test of their skill, or do they actually want to get to know us? And if it’s the latter, I want them to actually try. I want them to read our work, to listen to our complaints about what we’ve seen so far. I want them to force themselves to truly think about what life is like for us. I want both writers and audiences to ask themselves what it feels like to be us — not just what it feels like to be near us. I want stories about being us to matter as much as stories about being near us do now.

I want all of this, because most of all, I want the next little Sarah to be able to watch a film and — instead of a caricature or a punchline — see herself.

Is Roxane Gay’s ‘Hunger’ a Memoir or a Polemic?

Posted on by 007595

“Double Take” is our literary criticism series wherein two readers tackle a highly-anticipated book’s innermost themes, successes, failures, trappings, and surprises. In this edition, Electric Literature contributors Natalie Coleman and Apoorva Tadepalli discuss Roxane Gay’s Hunger: A Memoir of (My) Body.

I n Hunger, Roxane Gay bares all, writing from her innermost depths to come to grips with the nightmares of her past and how they’ve shaped her present and future. Gay has written a truly harrowing and unabashed depiction of what it means to live with and within the body we are born into and tasked to understand.

Natalie Coleman is a writer living in New York. She tweets at @_nataliecoleman. Apoorva Tadepalli is a graduate student of Cultural Reporting and Criticism at NYU. She is from Bombay and lives, of course, in Brooklyn. She tweets at @storyshaped.

Natalie Coleman: Books that deal with weight loss, even if they talk of appetite, often know nothing of desire. Roxane Gay’s new memoir, Hunger: A Memoir of (My) Body serves as a taxonomy of its author’s insatiable desires: for food and sex, kindness and freedom, love and respect. It is a book about the human need to consume and be consumed, as well as the pleasure — and pain — that comes from indulging. “The story of my life is wanting, hungering for what I cannot have or, perhaps, wanting what I dare not allow myself to have,” Gay writes.

Gay revisits each phase of her life as a large woman, from her lonely years as an overweight adolescent through the unhealthy relationships and eating disorders that shadowed her adulthood. We first see a young Roxane as the happy girl from a loving, middle-class Haitian-American family. The little girl grows up quickly after being brutally gang-raped as a twelve-year-old girl in a cabin in the woods. From then on, Gay made herself bigger: She ate herself into an invisibility that could only come from making herself large and undesirable, as she saw herself. Gay formed her body into a bastion, eating until she felt safe, until her skin stretched and resembled nothing of the girl she once was.

Roxane Gay’s new memoir, Hunger: A Memoir of (My) Body serves as a taxonomy of its author’s insatiable desires: for food and sex, kindness and freedom, love and respect.

In fragmentary chapters, Gay meditates on the burden of living with her “unruly body” — a term she adopts for its rebellious spirit — and the daily trials of simply existing in a fat body. But ultimately it is a story of her own particular body. As Gay said recently in an interview with Guernica, “This is a memoir, not a polemic, and I’m not a spokesperson for the fat community by any stretch, nor would they want me to be.”

Apoorva Tadepalli: No, she’s not a spokesperson for any community. Her career has kind of been defined by a sort of humble, individual voice that is good at finding fresh ways to talk about the “underdog,” while still remaining relatable. I think the most important and interesting thing to note about Roxane Gay, looking at both this book and her career since it really took off, is what a genius she has been at reading and responding to the conversations of the zeitgeist. She created a version of a good feminist in order to posit herself as a bad one, and this is brilliant because it makes her a trustworthy critic. She is trustworthy when she talks about her body, and the body — her sexual desires; the effects of being touched in certain ways, both violent and not; the significance of clothes and popular clothing in our consumerist culture; the connection between food, cooking, her adolescent shyness and her relationship with her family — because she carefully details very familiar experiences in a very raw and honest way.

In this modest way, she is the perfect Tumblr idol: She’s always been able, as she continues to do in this book, to combine pop culture with feminist theory with teenage girl crazes — and she was talking about identity politics and body positivity when it was still really the conversation of the underdog, or of the socially handicapped, or of the lonely fangirls intimately familiar with the dark corners of the internet. And as this book indicates, that is a space and a conversation she understands very deeply, perhaps instinctively as a cultural critic — and in theory, it is a space and conversation that are imperative to any cultural conversation.

Support Electric Lit: Become a Member!

On the other hand, I’m unsure of how I feel about the book given its timing. Much of the book, which critiques beauty standards and rape culture through both cultural commentary and personal history, is both essential and true. But to a great degree, it is also a repetition — of both her own work as well as of the conversations of our time. I think I would have found the book much more moving had I read it five or ten years ago; at this point, I think it is natural for a reader, or maybe it’s just me, to find the language of identity politics — like the use of “patriarchy” or “male gaze,” for example — that she uses to make her statements, a little flat and a little obvious.

NC: I agree with you there, in that when Gay shifted into politicized discussions of feminism and body positivity movements, it wasn’t persuasive. There’s almost the sense that — for anyone who’s read Bad Feminist, or even Gay’s Twitter feed — we’ve covered this territory with her before as a reader. But still, I think Gay transcends the Tumblr feedback loop of self-affirmation. Though she may speak to the interests of the community on Tumblr — who seem to regard her as a divining rod of all that is feminist — I found the memoir free from the public figure we’ve come to (think we) know. This book is an exposure, a flash bulb illuminating the corners of Gay’s mind, the closed doors, the rough edges.

Gay’s writing can feel deflated by an overuse of cliché and repetitive phrasing, though I agree with how Hannah Black addressed this in Bookforum: “A critique of her style would be elitist and pointless — her many fans love her regardless, and her work does not ask to be read as literary.” As a reader, I don’t need literary language to fathom the shame Gay feels when she is introduced to a family friend who has never met her and sees reflected in their eyes the disbelief that Gay could come from such a fit, beautiful family. Even from her own blood, she is relegated.

Roxane Gay created a version of a good feminist in order to posit herself as a bad one, and this is brilliant because it makes her a trustworthy critic.

For me, much of the memoir’s honesty lies in the prosaic description of favored, and sometimes heartbreaking, memories, like when Gay describes how her mother spent hours smoothing out her angular, little head with the steady stroke of her hand. Toward the end of the book, Gay searches for her assailant online, finding his social media profiles and job title. She learns everything about the person he became and even calls him at the office, hanging up after a long pause of charged silence. This need to find him, to see the man he became, was a moment of clarity for me when I realized that this book is a way for Gay to acquit herself from the ensnaring memories of her past.

Later in her life, when Gay became a successful writer, she attended a literary event in New York during her book tour for Bad Feminist. The venue, Housing Works, where she was scheduled to be on a panel, had no preparations for Gay’s size. As the event began, she suffered through a humiliating attempt to raise herself onto the raised stage platform, requiring help from another panelist. “To tell the story of my body is to tell you about shame,” she writes, and this shame is one that many large women and men will find familiar, the shame that accompanies the literal navigation of a fat body.

At times, the act of reading Hunger can feel like an imposition, as though you are spying on Gay as she whispers secret shames to herself in the mirror. These revelations can be harrowing, like the details of her years spent binging and purging her meals, when her hair began falling out, her knuckles sliced by the points of her teeth. But sometimes the whispers read more like a personal mantra, repeating endlessly phrases like “I ate to get bigger, to become invisible” or “to hide in plain sight” which, after each appearance on the page, lose their potency.

AT: Hannah Black’s comment is really interesting — it does describe Gay’s style, which is very plain-spoken. While at times this plainspokenness slips into stylistic carelessness — like the paragraphs where every sentence begins with “I”, or where the same adjective, like “awkward” or “cruel” is used multiple times in the span of a few sentences — there is something extremely likable about her, both as a person and as a narrator, and maybe this is because the two are not very different. Almost every review of the book praised in particular its honesty, and this is connected to the straightforward tone and the “mundane” descriptions, which are riveting.

She is, for example, very invested in cooking — like, the enthusiastic, over-descriptive, joyful kind of invested. I couldn’t put the book down while she was talking about Ina Garten’s cooking show, the tips Ina offers, the specific brownie she makes for a group of construction workers, the fact that she loves rhetorical questions, or Gay’s own experiences with cooking, using Blue Apron, and the step-by-step process of making her first meal (cannellini bean and escarole salad with crispy potatoes). These details, sometimes several pages of them, speak for themselves and only strengthen the connection she trying to make between her relationship to cooking and the broader theme of hunger. “When the potatoes were ready, they went onto a baking sheet and I drizzled them with olive oil, salt, and pepper. They baked at 500 degrees for twenty-five minutes and my kitchen got unbearably hot,” she writes.

“I began thinking about the melancholy of cooking for yourself when you are single and living alone. One of the many reasons it took me so long to learn how to cook and learn to enjoy cooking is that it often feels like such a waste to go to all that trouble for myself. Dinner would not wait for melancholy, so after rinsing and draining the beans, I softened a yellow onion, then assembled the salad, adding tomato, the beans, the lettuce, the dressing, all served over the crispy potatoes.”

I give such a long quote because I think that this sort of ritualistic, visceral experience of the world that she shows us is really powerful, and very inspiring, in terms of both writing style as well as life. It makes very clear, without explicitly saying so, that she is grappling with self-care and productivity, and social attitudes towards these things. She does the same when she describes clothes, her love of fashion, the cuts and colors and styles she likes — and also what getting dressed feels like for her, the “performance” of it, how she has two wardrobes (one for her everyday clothes and one for the clothes she doesn’t have the courage to wear), how she enjoys staring at her dress slacks and not putting them on — and the vivid, precise moments when clothes are put on. “My throat constricts. The clothes shrink. Sleeves become tourniquets. Slacks become shackles.” It is an exhausting procedure and very intimate to read about. And then finally when she says, “Sometimes, I decide on an outfit and leave my bedroom. It’s a mundane moment, but for me it is not,” something about it just makes complete, immediate sense and almost glows.

The act of reading Hunger can feel like an imposition, as though you are spying on Gay as she whispers secret shames to herself in the mirror.

NC: I really enjoyed reading Gay’s description of her wardrobe and the struggle with finding clothing she’s comfortable with. The dearth of wearable, stylish clothing for large women has been well covered, but Gay’s writing pinpoints the small moments when your desire for the way you want to look doesn’t comport with reality. She wishes to wear beautiful clothing: patterned shirts in unique styles, dresses in brilliant colors. As you mention, she has a separate wardrobe filled with dream garments. I, too, keep around two or three pieces of clothing that I adore, but can’t wear — fitted lace dresses that scold me from the corner of my closet, reminding me that they are unattainable for my current body. Gay wants to feel pretty, she wants to feel comfortable in lipstick and low-cut tops. “Fierce vanity smolders in the cave of my chest,” she writes. “I want to look good. I want to feel good. I want to be beautiful in this body I am in.”

I think you’re right about Gay’s attempts to practice self-care. For years, the act of eating was time to binge, to control what was going on around her. It wasn’t about nutrition or feeding the body. It was an act of pure desire, followed by immediate shame. For her, eating was temporarily filling, but ultimately unfulfilling, a never-ending cycle of disappointment. To break her unhealthy eating habits and replace them with patient, organized eating marked the beginning of Gay’s effort to restructure her life around health, rather than the fulfillment of a hollow desire.

For so long, the desires of Gay’s body have been on the horizon line, forever unattainable and just beyond her grasp. She punished herself for her trauma, finding intimacy in the arms of people who were bad for her. “For far too long, I did not know desire. I simply gave myself, gave my body, to whoever offered me even the faintest of interest,” she writes. After her rape, Gay became forever detached from her own skin. Her body was removed from who she was: a frame to live in, but not to live a life in.

AT: That’s a good way to phrase it — that tension is really what drives the book. The life that she lives in her body is often defined by the ways in which she can take ownership of it — “take my body back,” as she calls it. One of my favorite chapters is the one about her tattoos. She has several, and they don’t have particularly significant meanings, which I think is interesting because, as she points out, tattoos are more about the experience of getting marked than they are about the actual design that you then have on your body forever. The experience is a very specifically and strangely amorous one, because of what she calls the “controlled surrender” of it. These moments of willingly turning herself over to a stranger for them to inflict pain on her as they will are some of the interesting ways that she deeply explores her body’s needs and the possible ways of creating a life inside her body. “Here, in the middle of my life, I would do things differently if I had to do it all again, but I would still have tattoos,” she says, and we get a sense of the imperfect intimacy she has created with herself over time that the book sort of turns on.

The life that she lives in her body is often defined by the ways in which she can take ownership of it — “take my body back,” as she calls it.

This is also what makes her myriad relationships significant in the book. When she moved to Michigan she started playing poker at a casino, and one of the men there followed her home once, and then again and again, standing on her porch and talking to her through her screen door while she stared out at him from inside, and it took her a long time to realize that he was not stalking her but trying to ask her out, and longer still to realize, after they started dating, that he wasn’t going to hurt her. This is how many of the characters in her life function in the book. We understand her, and the way she struggles with and sometimes denies herself happiness, through the people around her who sometimes hurt her and sometimes don’t — and vice versa.

NC: Exactly, and what I loved most about her writing on relationships was her absolute refusal to explain and give excuses for her choice in partner, even when those choices may have been a mistake. When Gay was 19 years old, she came out to her parents over the phone. She was in a relationship with one woman, but vying to be with another, one who treated her horribly. Gay was “a gaping wound of need,” and threw herself into relationships with people who continuously beat her down — even one who criticised the way she walked, breathed, even slept. She admits that at times, she chose relationships that made her into a victim. Coming out to her parents, she thought she knew what she wanted, that she was attracted to women (Gay now identifies as bisexual) but she admits that the truth is always messy, and that she “wanted to do everything in my power to remove the possibility of being with men from my life.”

Her relationships can be very unhealthy, but she doesn’t concern herself with psychoanalyzing her actions. Instead, she writes about her relationships as a reflection of who she was at that time, like a measurment of her growth, and each one reveals a Roxane that is more focused on herself and less on giving herself to others. Gay writes about the need to force herself to feel attracted to anyone who showed any interest in her: the fear that, if she did not reciprocate, she would have lost her only chance to be with someone, to be intimate, to be loved. These admissions define Gay’s suffering: the belief that her self-formed fortress of a body is not so much a protection as it is a cage barring her from genuine love and happiness.

There is something about having an unruly body that withholds you from tenderness, and Gay’s life of abuse is an example of this. Those who see an imperfect body as less — than human, than valuable — often treat that body brutally. Whether you are overweight or disabled or elderly or even a different race, the disconnect between them and your unwelcome, unknown body leads to an unrestrained roughness, dealt physically and emotionally. For Gay, her body is a means of protection, but it has also brought her a great deal of pain in relationships. “Lovers were often rough with me as if that was the only way they could understand touching a body as fat as mine,” she writes. “I accepted this because I did not deserve kindness or a gentle touch.”

Roxane Gay Is Feeling Ambitious

AT: Gay’s own tenderness is a really significant part of this book and the narrative voice; we witness acts of violence towards her that shape her tenderness, and we also witness acts of tenderness towards her that trigger her detachment. At the end of the day, the book in many ways is her gentle touch towards herself, and indirectly towards us, that she has craved from others: an attentive and unjudging document of a life.

It reminds me of what she told Guernica about this being a memoir, not a polemic — she is not, as she says, a spokesperson for the fat community and she is absolutely not advocating for thinness; and it’s through her life experience that she challenges our culture’s toxic understanding of “health” and the way we often mix it up with some imagined ethical code for how to live life. And what makes her a likeable and interesting narrator, of course, is not that she can or cannot lose weight but that she doesn’t want to.

At the same time, I think the tenderness of the book, especially the ending — where she talks, among other things, about healing — is also polemical, in a way, maybe unintentionally. “I am as healed as I am ever going to be,” she says, and “doing the best she can to love well and be loved well, to live well and be human and good.” But the fact that her healing has been imperfect and messy is in itself a kind of “perfect resolution,” which I found a little predictable and therefore disappointing. But it’s also a resolution that subtly calls for a better understanding of what healing can be and how self-love can work, and in this way it can be called a “body positive” work too, which is why I think it’s a kind of polemic as well as a memoir. Healing and self-love are important in our culture, and she responds to this, sincerely and acutely. We need kind people who can tell us, and posit to the world, that it is okay to be messy and incomplete, and for our healing to be messy and incomplete, as long as we do the best we can. We’ve always needed that. Understandable, because it’s true — but I don’t think it’s new.

We need kind people who can tell us, and posit to the world, that it is okay to be messy and incomplete, and for our healing to be messy and incomplete, as long as we do the best we can.

NC: Right, because there is no skinny, smiling Roxane waiting for us at the end of the book, drowning inside a giant pair of Levis. Instead, we encounter a woman equally as happy, who also happens to be unchanged physically. The book does not promise a personal revelation, and Gay isn’t concerned with the book’s universal impact. Her personal story isn’t meant to inspire readers to lose weight as some attempt at happiness, but rather Gay is showing us that freedom can come from accepting our own hunger.

At the end of the book, Gay begins the long battle of “tearing down” her walls, as she writes in the final chapter. Her hunger, which will always be a part of her, is no longer something she must succumb to; instead, her desire is the source of her strength.

60 Years of Elmore Leonard on Screen

Posted on by 007595

We look back at the crime master’s legacy and rank the 10 best movies and shows from a flashy, sexy, foul-mouthed oeuvre

clockwise from left Pam Grier, Timothy Olyphant, Walton Goggins, Rene Russo, John Travolta, and boom, back to Pam Grier

What makes for a great Elmore Leonard adaptation? After 60 years of hustlers, gun-slingers and femme fatales — that’s right, they’ve been adapting his work since 1957 — we can distill a few lessons on how best to bring the crime master’s work to the screen. In five basic steps:

(1) Embrace the chit-chat.

(2) Film somewhere sunny.

(3) Film in restaurants, bars, diners, coffee shops, and more bars.

(4) Hire Samuel L. Jackson. Or Pam Grier. Ideally both at the same time.

(5) When in doubt, throw somebody in the trunk of a car.

That’s pretty much the established wisdom. But what is the right ratio of caper to cool? What’s that perfect balance where an (almost absurdly) intricate plot plays out with enough space for the characters to breathe and let loose and just bullshit in that inimitable way that made Leonard’s material so iconic? The beloved author, one of the genre’s great craftsmen, has tempted many a screenwriter over the years. The results have been hit-or-miss. For every Travolta turn there’s a Caruso made-for-TV flick dragging the oeuvre down. But overall the track record is pretty impressive, especially if you like your crimes to play out in attractive climes, perpetrated by small-time hustlers with rakish lawmen on the trail. The last couple years, the pop culture has remained sadly outside the Leonard universe, ever since the end of FX’s long running hillybilly noir hit, Justified. The hiatus ends this weekend, when Epix launches Chris O’Dowd as Chili Palmer in a new adaptation of Leonard’s Get Shorty. How does the new iteration stack up against the old? Can O’Dowd come out of Travolta’s shadow? We’ll see.

For now we’ve taken it on ourselves to count down the top-10 adaptations of Leonard’s novels and stories. So, put on your cowboy hat, roll down your convertible top, and get ready for some flashy, sexy, fast-talking mayhem.

1. Jackie Brown (1997)

Can you think of a better pairing of director and source material? Leonard and Tarantino were a match made in a chatty, sleazy, violent heaven, and the author himself considered Jackie Brown the best of the many adaptations of his work. The 1997 flick boasted a jaw-dropping cast, starring Pam Grier at her most powerful, savoring every second of those long, slow Tarantino tracking shots. Who ever walked through an airport with more style? Not a damn person. Years later, Leonard told Martin Amis that Tarantino was nervous about having taken so many liberties in adapting the 1992 novel, Rum Punch. According to the author: “Quentin Tarantino, just before he started to shoot, said, ‘I’ve been afraid to call you for the last year.’ I said, ‘Why? Because you changed the title of my book? And you’re casting a black woman in the lead?’ And he said, ‘Yeah.’ And I said, ‘You’re a filmmaker. You can do whatever you want.’ I said, ‘I think Pam Grier is a terrific idea. Go ahead.’ I was very pleased with the results, too.” Now that’s a solid working relationship.

2. Justified (2010–2015)

Justified — built out of Leonard’s short story “Fire in the Hole,” about US Marshal Raylan Givens chasing fugitives in his hometown hills of Kentucky — finally wrapped in 2015, after six seasons on the air. What began as a fairly run-of-the-mill procedural transformed into an ambitious serial, and one of the most enjoyable programs on TV. (It also seemed to be following a full-employment model for any actor who ever appeared in HBO’s Deadwood.) Timothy Olyphant as Raylan, the sly, wry gunslinger, was a revelation: a charmer with a conscience but more than willing to put the toe of his boot up your ass. But the show’s secondary characters were the real feast, with Damon Herriman as the unforgettable Dewey Crowe and Walton Goggins as Boyd Crowder, who began as a stock villain but would eventually build a case as the show’s co-lead. There wasn’t much source material for Graham Yost and the writing staff to go on with Justified, but they always kept true to the spirit of Leonard’s work, reportedly wearing WWED wrist bands so that whenever they hit a bind in the plot or characterization, they would remember to ask, “What Would Elmore Do?” And the admiration was mutual, too. Leonard called the show “terrific” and told a 2012 FX panel that, “I’m amazed sometimes that they’ve got the characters better than I put them on paper…My god, it’s a lot better than what I would have written in the scene, you know.” Leonard even went so far as to write his final novel, Raylan, inspired by the show’s ideas and Olyphant’s work as Marshal Givens.

3. Get Shorty (1995)

Barry Sonnenfeld’s 1995 Get Shorty is probably the purist Leonard adaptation around: a snappy satire dripping with cool customers, hapless losers, and schemers of all stripe, all hopping between Miami, Las Vegas, and Hollywood in a madcap plot that’s really just a vehicle for a certain skewed and colorful worldview. And let’s get real: John Travolta is one of the ultimate Leonard actors. His Chili Palmer is preternaturally cool and endearing, a Bensonhurst tough guy seduced by Hollywood lore (seduced by Rene Russo, too, because who wouldn’t be?) and oddly expert at navigating the ins-and-outs of a troubled studio production. Throw in turns by Danny DeVito, Delroy Lindo, Gene Hackman, James Gandolfini, and yes, Bette Middler, too, and you have the makings of a damn entertaining Leonard romp, one that holds up surprisingly well all these years later and is just about always available for streaming on one service or another.

4. Out of Sight (1998)

This 1998 adaptation is best remembered for the heat emanating off its co-stars, George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez. And with good reason. Even Leonard owned it at the time: ‘’You put Jennifer Lopez in it,” the author said, “that’s going to make it sexy.’’ The movie’s opening sets the tone with one of the great meet-cutes in modern film history, as Clooney and Lopez are thrown in the trunk of the same car and get to know one another in those almost intolerably close confines. (It’s a fine line between claustrophobic and erotically charged, turns out.) Scott Frank, who also adapted Get Shorty for the screen, wrote the screenplay for Out of Sight, too, and brings the same zip to Leonard’s scenes. And Steven Soderbergh, fresh off a string of indie hits, proved with this one that nobody was more capable of telling a flashy, fun heist story (and thus the Ocean’s franchise was reborn…)

5. 3:10 to Yuma (1957)

3:10 to Yuma is the original, and still among the best Leonard flicks. Adapted from a short story in Dime Western Magazine, the 1957 film was directed by Delmer Daves and had about as striking a visual style as you’re likely to come across in any classic or modern Western. The story is simple — a prisoner needs to be escorted to a train; a good man takes the job, and the forces of evil and corruption align against him — but the suspense is astonishing. Glenn Ford and Van Heflin put on a master class in Old West drama, while Felicia Farr makes a damn fine barmaid/damsel. And for some trivia: the movie was such a hit in Cuba, of all places, “Yuma” has apparently become an everyday slang term on the island. That’s a pretty impressive cultural reach for a story that’s been around for more than six decades.

Ranking Every John Le Carré Adaptation

6. 3:10 to Yuma (2007)

A solid, almost inspired remake, all things considered. Christian Bale and Russell Crowe don the white and black hats and do their level best to exude the rugged morality and style that made the American West into a myth. The most interesting feature, though, might be James Mangold’s direction. Yuma, it turns out, was his apprentice project, with 2017’s Logan the payoff.

7. Hombre (1967)

Hombre doesn’t enjoy 3:10 to Yuma’s elevated status in the canon, but it brought to the screen a considerable style of its own and drummed up a leading role just about worthy of its lead actor, Paul Newman, who played John Russell, the gunslinger raised by Indians and forced to reckon with the cruel winds of change sweeping across the West. Plus it’s worth seeing what Martin Ritt (Hud, The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, Norma Rae) does with a Western.

8. Be Cool (2005)

Look, is this just a re-tread of Get Shorty without any special panache or perspective of its own? Sure, but so what? It gives us one more spin with Travolta as Chili Palmer. And it was the first movie where Dwayne Johnson, currently reigning as the world’s most magnetic movie star, proved that he was more than just a set of pecs and in fact had real comedic acting chops. Oh, and if Vince Vaughn had better advisors, he would find a way to only act in Doug Liman movies or stories set within the expanded Elmore Leonard universe.

9. The Big Bounce (2004)

Leonard’s first crime novel was twice forgettably adapted, once in 1969 and again in 2004. It’s hard to give one film an edge over the other, especially since hardly anyone alive has seen the 1969 version, although the New York Times called it a “hothouse item about swinging sex and crime, junior division,” which admittedly sounds…okay? Leonard cited the 2004 version as one of the worst adaptations of his work. “I know The Big Bounce was bad,” he told an FX panel back in 2012. “I don’t think anybody in the picture knew what it was about. The second time it was made they shot it in Hawaii and they would cut to surfers when they’d run out of ideas.” Still, the latter movie stars Owen Wilson and Morgan Freeman, not a bad pairing, and ‘when in doubt, cut to surfers’ isn’t really all that terrible a maxim for moviemaking, is it? Better than cutting to not-surfers.

10. Gold Coast (1997)

By all means, tune in for David Caruso and the South Florida scenery, but if you decide to stick around, it’ll be for Marg Helgenberger as the sultry widow. This was Leonard’s first trip to South Florida’s underbelly — a crime story about hustlers, mobsters, and real estate. The adaptation first aired on Showtime, way back before the Golden Era of TV. It was mostly a Miami Vice nostalgia vehicle for Caruso, looking also to capitalize on Leonard’s spike in popularity in the mid-90’s. Is this going to change your life or your opinion of Leonard’s place in the crime pantheon? Probably not, but you could do worse. And after all, how many authors have 10 great adaptations?

Honorable Mention

Killshot (2008)

This one barely made it to theaters, having pulled off the somewhat difficult trick of making an Elmore Leonard story dull. But then again Mickey Rourke and Diane Lane in any sort of crime flick are almost worth the price of admission.

Valdez is Coming (1971)

Burt Lancaster is Valdez. And He. Is. Coming.

Electric Literature Seeks Editorial Intern for Fall 2017

Posted on by 007595

The deadline for Applications has been extended to September 8!

Electric Literature internships introduce undergraduate and graduate students, emerging writers, and aspiring publishing professionals to digital publishing and the New York literary scene. Because we are a small, not-for-profit publisher, we provide unique opportunities for professional development and resume-building.

As an Electric Literature intern, you are encouraged to become involved in any aspect of our work that interests you. You’ll sort mail and go to the post office, but you’ll also do things like contribute to editorial decisions, write for the site, and attend cool literary events.

Responsibilities:

  • Comb the web and social media for breaking literary news
  • Write daily news items for electricliterature.com
  • Staff events (including our table at the Brooklyn Book Festival on September 17)
  • Select images to pair with articles
  • Format, copy edit, and draft articles
  • Update contact databases
  • Fulfill online merchandise sales
  • Transcribe interviews
  • Write and schedule social media posts
  • Perform other administrative tasks
  • Open mail and catalogue books

Skills:

  • Personal experience using Medium, Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram — professional experience is a plus
  • Excellent writing skills and a unique point of view
  • Basic understanding of Photoshop and inDesign
  • Firm grasp of grammar and spelling
  • Organized and fastidious

The ideal candidate:

  • Has an educational background in journalism, literature, or creative writing
  • Has prior internship or entry-level job experience at another publishing, media, or non-profit organization
  • Participates in the contemporary literary scene
  • Regularly reads literary magazines and literary websites (including but not limited to Recommended Reading and electricliterature.com)
  • Believes strongly in the Electric Literature mission: To expand the influence of literature in popular culture by fostering lively and innovative literary conversations and making exceptional writing accessible to new audiences
  • Is hard-working, pays great attention to detail, and can work independently
  • Writes clearly and with personality
  • Has an eye for design and knows what images will grab reader’s attention

This is a part time internship (10–20 hours/week). There is no stipend, but interns will be paid for pieces they contribute the site. Candidates must be able to come to our office in Downtown Brooklyn at least 2 days/week. We are happy to work with universities and MFA programs to provide course credit, though you do not need to be a student to apply. This four-month internship runs from September 5 through December 22 (exact dates are flexible, and there may be an opportunity to extend the internship into 2018).

To apply, please send a the following to editors@electricliterature.com with the subject “INTERNSHIP APPLICATION: Your Name” by midnight on Friday, September 8, 2017.

  1. A cover letter and resume
  2. A sample Scuttlebutt post, along the lines of “Readers are Superior Lovers” or “Steve Bannon’s Touchstone Book is a Xenophobic, Racist French Novel.” Choose a news story you think will be relevant and interesting to Electric Literature readers.
  3. Complete the social media test below. (Copy and paste into a new document.)

Electric Literature Social Media Test

  1. Create a shareable image for this quote: “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” — James Baldwin
  2. Electric Literature just announced the Bodega Project, with the support of the New York City Department of Public Affairs. Write a tweet sharing the news and linking to a source with more information.
  3. Create a Facebook post about this article: “11 Fictional Restaurants We Wish Existed.”
  4. Write a Facebook post and a Tweet about this article: “Literature Needs Angry Female Heroes.”
  5. Write a tweet and a Facebook post encouraging readers to become members of Electric Literature.
  6. Create an Instagram post and a tweet promoting Papercuts: A Party Game for the Rude and Well-Read.
  7. Write a link roundup of 5 articles not published on Electric Literature, with at least one sentence about each.