SCANDAL! The New Yorker Rejects Its Own Story

This was bound to happen sooner or later. At The Review Review, author David Cameron reveals that he disguised an old New Yorker story, re-submitted it with a new title and byline, and was rejected at every turn.

The logic? “If the New Yorker is the most desirable literary magazine in the world, and if the New Yorker can have any short story the New Yorker wants, then whatever story the New Yorker gets would — logically — be so intrinsically desirable that all lesser literary pubs (e.g., everyone) would pine for it. Just like the prettiest girl at the dance: the guy she picks is the guy chicks dig. Basic deduction 101.”

What do the results say about the subjectivity of art? The fallibility of editors? The slushpile quagmire? Who knows, but everyone loves a scandal. Refresh your schadenfreude here.

***
 — Benjamin Samuel is the co-editor of Electric Literature. He plagiarizes Justin Bieber’s tweets here.

More Like This

What If Breaking Students to Build Them Back Up Only Breaks Them Down?

I experienced my college essay course not only as a threat to my personal style, but also as a threat to what writing—and writing education—could be

Oct 15 - Helen Betya Rubinstein

Lydia Millet’s Writerly Evolution Is All About Being More Shameless

The prolific Pulitzer Prize finalist discusses writing outdoors, being brutally honest about writer’s block, and saying no to line edits

Oct 13 - Electric Literature
Thank You!