12 Books for Sports Fanatics

Posted on by 007595

The very first fragments of the book that would become True were written over 20 years ago as part of a planned non-fiction book about soccer in America that, even before I was 20 pages in, had become a fiction book about rival soccer teams in a Los Angeles amateur league. Those first soccer files were lost several computers ago, but the world of pick-up soccer in Los Angeles continued to obsess me.

Purchase the novel

Three years ago I returned to the material, but for some reason, this time I was writing as a female soccer player, one so talented she could dominate in pick up soccer games with men. Her life story, how she came to be this girl who played on dusty, far-flung pitches on weekday afternoons, turned out to be the story I wanted to tell. Why had nobody heard of the best soccer player of her generation? She was the female soccer equivalent of basketball playground legends like Joe Hammond or Earl Manigault. While I was writing, I wasn’t thinking of the potential pitfalls of writing a female main character or the commercial risks of writing a sports novel. Sports novels seldom make the bestseller list.

From the memoir of an NFL wide receiver to a novel about a chess player struggling with addiction, here are twelve books about sports that have stayed with me,

The Queen’s Gambit by Walter Tevis

The protagonist, Beth Harmon, is a brilliant chess player struggling with addiction. The descriptions of orphan Beth Harmon’s discovery of chess and her steady climb up to Bobby Fisher levels of chess dominance provide a natural and comfortable narrative structure. Tevis is masterful in his depiction of Beth’s peculiar genius and unique talent. The lexicon of chess gambits and moves could easily alienate a general reader, yet through the lens of Beth’s intense and peculiar intelligence — today, Beth would be described as on the spectrum — the story exerts a magnetic pull.

“202 Checkmates” by Rion Amilcar Scott

The Southpaw by Mark Harris

Bang the Drum Slowly is the much better known and praised of Mark Harris’ novels, but its precursor, The Southpaw, is less sentimental and more ambitious. Narrated by a young prospect, Henry Wiggins, climbing the New York Mammoth’s system, The Southpaw is a coming-of-age novel wrapped around the story of Sam Yale, a veteran pitcher near the end of his career, idolized by young Henry Wiggins. Yale, an aged, angry tyro, can’t help but challenge the adoration of the young naif. “I just play for the money I do not need and fornicate for the kicks I never get,” Yale tells Wiggins, “If I was to write a book they would never print it. It would be five words long. It would say, Do Not Fuck With Me.”

Fat City by Leonard Gardner

It’s impossible to exclude Gardner’s only book from this list. It’s a sports novel in the way that, say, Double Indemnity is an insurance novel. Gardner’s Billy Tully and Ernie Munger are fighters so low-down on the bill that when they fight on the road, their trainer puts them on a bus and wishes them luck. The book is set in the kind of dive bars, fleabag hotels, and strawberry fields familiar to Jack London and John Steinbeck, only Gardner has the courage to shy away from redemption for his failed and never-was boxers. The ring beckons as redemption, and Gardner has the courage the deny his characters any such salvation.

Slow Getting Up by Nate Jackson

Nate Jackson, a bottom of the roster tight end and wide receiver for the Denver Broncos, was never a household name and that’s what makes his book about the realities of life in the NFL so captivating. Jackson’s NFL is a cynical and manipulative entertainment conglomerate that exploits athletes like Jackson who know full well the price they are paying and would eagerly do it again. What makes Jackson’s book so fascinating is that awareness at the price he is paying, mentally and bodily, yet he ultimately concludes, reluctantly, that the intoxication of living this alpha-male version of the American dream is fully worth the price. Jackson writes with a surprising wit, and rejects your sympathy even as he is explaining how players feel compelled to take any medication or injection they can to get out on the field. It’s the most honest book I’ve read about the National Football League.

Solo: A Memoir of Hope by Hope Solo with Ann Killion

Hope Solo’s tumultuous history with the United States Women’s National Team, her frequent and public disputes with coaches and players, and her legal troubles, have made her a controversial figure who is also, inconvertibly, the best goalie in women’s soccer history. Her life story tells of when she was kidnapped by her father at age seven, the rival girls she has punched in the face, and names the teammates she despises. It’s rare to read an athlete be this candid about her struggles.

A Fan’s Notes by Frederick Exley

Exley’s fictional memoir of obsessive fandom foresaw the future of American sports and the obsessive identification with gridiron heroes that has by now become accepted behavior. Believe it or not, there were decades during which you could go to a football game and nobody would be wearing his or her favorite player’s jersey. Exley’s tragic memoir, during which his obsessions with Frank Gifford and the New York Giants became an escape from his debilitating depression, provide a remarkable snapshot of where American sports fandom was heading, even as Exley himself was wise enough to warn that his own compulsion was destroying him.

9 Stories About Sports, Games, and Gamesmanship

Down and Dirty: The Life and Crimes of Oklahoma Football by Charles Thompson and Allan Sonnenschein

During the 1980s, Barry Switzer’s Oklahoma Sooners were the best team in college football, running an impossible to stop wishbone offense built around fleet-footed quarterbacks recruited by dubious means. When Heisman-frontrunner Jamelle Holleway was injured in 1987, Charles Thompson stepped in to lead the Sooners to an 11–1 record and the Orange Bowl. Down and Dirty tells the inside story of those teams, the money players were receiving, the crack-smoking in limousines outside country clubs where Holleway and Thompson were about to give motivational anti-drug talks, and Thompson’s eventual arrest by the FBI for selling cocaine to an undercover agent. One of my favorite sections of the book was Thompson describing his childhood in Lawton, Oklahoma, where he ran for money as drug dealers and bookies would bet on young boys in footraces.

I Am Third by Gale Sayers with Al Silverman

I am including this book because it’s the sports biography I read as a young boy that left a powerful impression on me and humanized a larger than life athlete. Young boys and girls of a certain type read these kinds of sanitized sports biographies and, inevitably, some of them will stick with us even as we reach adulthood. I will never forget Gale Sayers receiving a free hamburger for every touchdown he scored in high school, and eventually eating seven “Pookie” burgers after one game. Also, this book contained the powerful chapter “Pic”, about Brian Piccolo, the running back who would pass away from cancer, that would become the basis for the movie Brian’s Song. How could a young boy resist?

Soccer Against the Enemy: How the World’s Most Popular Sport Starts and Fuels Revolutions and Keeps Dictators in Power by Simon Kuper

Well before How Soccer Explains the World by Franklin Foer, there was this masterpiece by Kuper, who wrote about the variations and obsessions of soccer fans around the world and the very real class, religious, and national boundaries that are defined by loyalties to and for specific clubs. His book was written just before the total dominance of a dozen or so super clubs would change club soccer into a far more commercial endeavor. His description of the cultural differences of how the sport is played and watched around the world are still relevant today. The racism of the Ukraine, the Ajax developmental system, the Italian catenaccio defense, it’s all here, told in first person and vivid prose.

Pistol: The Life of Pete Maravich by Mark Kriegel

While I was writing True, I often thought of this book, in part because Maravish so much resembles the protagonist of my novel in that his sport was his sanctuary and the rest of his life outside of basketball always seemed to be turning to shit. Maravich spent his life outside of basketball searching for meaning, exploring yoga, Hinduism and even becoming a UFO obsessive at one point. Kriegel’s book deftly explains how Maravich’s family of origin and in particular his father, Press Maravich, created both the perfect basketball player and a deeply broken human being.

Sandy Koufax: A Lefty’s Legacy by Jane Leavy

I didn’t remember the subtitle to this book, and now find it odd, as the enigma that is Sandy Koufax somehow survives even this beautifully written account of one of our most beloved athletes. Leavy uses the nine innings and 27 batters of Koufax’s 1965 perfect game against the Chicago Cubs as the structure of the biography, using each at-bat and put-out as a prism to tell more and more of the lefty’s life story. The Koufax that emerges is the most complete picture yet, but Koufax himself remains somehow, tantalizingly elusive. The book takes on a beautiful, almost romantic quality as Leavy attempts to tease out the man. Certain figures somehow escape even the best writer’s attempt to capture their essence. Leavy’s masterpiece is perhaps one of my favorite types of books; a lovely, well-crafted, search that ultimately never quite finds its subject but leaves the reader honored at having witnessed the attempt.

Ghosts of Manila:The Fateful Blood Feud Between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier by Mark Kram Jr.

This history of Thrilla in Manilla, perhaps the most famous boxing match in history, is built around Kram’s spectacular reporting for Sports Illustrated on Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier in the 1970s. His deadline piece for the magazine, “Lawdy, Lawdy, He’s Great,” is one of the best pieces of prose ever dictated down a telephone to an editor just hours after the fight was over. “It was only a moment, sliding past the eyes like the sudden shifting of light and shadow, but long years from now it will remain a pure and moving glimpse of hard reality, and if Muhammad Ali could have turned his eyes upon himself, what first and final truth would he have seen.” And it goes on, with scenes involving Fernando and Imelda Marcos, the fight itself, and both Ali and a blinded Frazier after the fateful bell for the 15th. Over three years writing for Sports Illustrated, my dream was to write a piece as good. I never came close.

About the Author

New York Times bestselling author Karl Taro Greenfeld penned the novels The Subprimes and Triburbia, a New York Times Editor’s Choice. His memoir, Boy Alone, was a Washington Post Best Book of the Year. Karl has also written Dr. J: The Autobiography (co-authored with Julius Erving), NowTrends, China Syndrome, Standard Deviations, and Speed Tribes. His prize-winning writing has appeared in Harper’s Magazine, the Atlantic, the Paris Review, Vogue, GQ, the New York Times, and others. His books have been translated into twelve languages.

The New ‘Fahrenheit 451’ Movie Fails to Reckon with Bradbury’s Racism

Posted on by 007595

This piece contains spoilers for the new Fahrenheit 451 film on HBO.

I first read Fahrenheit 451 as an eleven-year-old bookworm, working my way through every scrap of written material available to me. It was the summer of 1995, and I’d never heard of the internet, so this meant trawling the big cardboard boxes overflowing with old paperbacks that had been stashed away in our garage. Taking a classic escapist route from my bad home life, I devoured them all — bleak dystopian novels, science textbooks well beyond my grade level, explicit romances that had my teachers asking my mother if that was really appropriate for a kid my age. A classmate once caught sight of me with a copy of Little Women and wrinkled her nose in distaste. “Why do you always read such weird old books?” she asked. I didn’t have any explanation — I just knew I couldn’t help it. Books unlocked new ideas, new possibilities, and I couldn’t get enough. It was only natural that a book set in a world where books were forbidden, where reading was a secret act of revolution against a hostile society, would fascinate me.

I still have that same copy of Fahrenheit 451 — a trade paperback edition printed circa 1993, whose creased cover and flammable pages are already yellowed and crumbling. I reread it prior to watching the new film version, starring Michael B. Jordan as protagonist Guy Montag, and Michael Shannon as his boss — and ultimately, the bad guy — Captain Beatty. The novel was largely as I remembered it, until I got to the end. At the back of the book, there are a few pages Bradbury wrote decades later, in 1979, where he gets into what he thinks the real threat to literature is. I’d forgotten that reading this coda as a child always left me feeling uncomfortable, in a way I couldn’t fully interpret yet.

In the coda, Bradbury is angry about what he describes as censorship, but there are a lot of different complaints all jostled together under that one big umbrella. There’s anger at the editors of Ballantine Books, who removed the words “damn” and “hell” from their edition of Fahrenheit 451. There’s anger at anthology editors who bowdlerized great authors when putting together a compilation of the classics for school readers. But most of his anger is aimed at the threat he believes to be posed by minorities.

He is angry at a “solemn young Vassar lady” who asked whether he might write more female characters. He is angry at other readers who disapprove of how he wrote “the blacks” in one of his stories. He is angry at “the Irish,” “the Chicano intellectuals,” at “every minority” that has some perspective on his stories at variance with his. In his own words, every last one of them “feels it has the will, the right, the duty to douse the kerosene, light the fuse…. Fire-Captain Beatty, in my novel Fahrenheit 451, described how the books were burned first by minorities, each ripping a page or a paragraph from this book, then that, until the day came when the books were empty and the minds shut and the libraries closed forever.”

In the coda, most of Bradbury’s anger is aimed at the threat he believes to be posed by minorities.

Beatty serves as the conduit for these views in the novel. In words that could have been spoken by the author himself, he tells the protagonist Montag, “Once, books appealed to a few people, here, there, everywhere. They could afford to be different. The world was roomy. But then the world got full of eyes and elbows and mouths. Double, triple, quadruple population. Films and radios, magazines, books leveled down to a sort of pastepudding norm, do you follow me?” Too many cooks spoil the intellect, it seems. Can’t have too many people reading, it’ll ruin it for the rest of us.

A few pages later, Beatty continues in this vein: “Bigger the population, the more minorities. Don’t step on the toes of the dog lovers, the cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico…. All the minor minor minorities with their navels to be kept clean.” This, he explains, is why magazines became “vanilla tapioca” and books became “dishwater,” although he grants that comic books and porn continue to do quite nicely.

Of course, this is a novel: the author’s ideas do not have to align with those of his characters. Based on his coda, though, I suspect these views are a pretty accurate picture of the inside of Bradbury’s head. The author was a legendary crank, and probably wasn’t a big fan of anyone who didn’t live up to his intellectual standards. The book takes this to a horrifying extreme: after Montag joins a small band of nomadic professors (all men), who hail from Harvard, UCLA, Columbia, and other elite universities, they all watch as the city they have fled is bombed out of existence. All the illiterate citizens left behind are obliterated: “the explosion rid itself of them in its own unreasonable way.” Literary types might call this a deus ex machina. It’s not exactly subtle.

Reading this passage now feels sickening. A story I once believed to be about the importance of staying open-minded and intellectually curious is unmistakably steeped in elitist, supremacist thinking, in which the hopeful vision of the future is one in which only men who went to good schools survive. This must feel like an even deeper betrayal to a person of color.

A story I once believed to be about the importance of staying open-minded and intellectually curious is unmistakably steeped in elitist, supremacist thinking.

As of this writing, the new film version, available on HBO, has a 32% critics’ rating and a 26% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes. This is stunningly bad for a movie based on a classic novel and helmed by two stars fresh off wildly successful movies. Adapting the book for modern audiences must have been a challenge: there’s a lot that was changed, and a lot of that doesn’t quite gel. In particular, other critics have pointed out the clumsy attempts to update the film to reflect modern technology. Early on, the book-burning firemen collect and burn a pile of computers and server equipment that had been successfully uploading scanned books… presumably to remote cloud storage, where others would still be able to access them? If so, that trail is never followed; the burning is treated as a complete victory.

What few critics have touched on, however, is the casting. Jordan initially hesitated to take on the role of Montag, telling IndieWire, “I wasn’t really interested in playing an authority figure,” given relations between the police and the African-American community. He came around after deciding that an authority figure with an arc that leads him to support the resistance was a valuable story to tell now. However, the movie tiptoes around this idea, where it could resonate powerfully.

For example, we periodically see images of Frederick Douglass throughout the movie, alternately being burned or uploaded for preservation. A former slave who learned to read in secret as an act of rebellion, Douglass might be a natural source of inspiration for Montag. But we never hear his name, and Montag never encounters his words.

A former slave who learned to read in secret as an act of rebellion, Frederick Douglass might be a natural source of inspiration for Montag. But we never hear his name, and Montag never encounters his words.

Only one scene directly addresses Montag’s race. The firemen have discovered a massive cache of books in an old woman’s house in the woods. Picture a grandparent’s summer cabin: countless classic paperbacks spilling off tables, weighing down half-broken bookshelves, piling up in stacks on the floor. Tonally, the moment where an awestruck Montag takes in the sight of that many books for the first time is half big library reveal from Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, half episode of Hoarders.

In this scene, Beatty, who has his own secret lust for literature, teases Montag with the books, picking them up at random and offering them to Montag before telling him of the dangers that they pose. “Ah, see? Huck Finn, and his n_____ friend,” he says, the camera panning away from the actor’s face as the slur is pronounced. “The whites knew that you blacks were offended, so what did we do? We burned it.” The movie has made a subtle shift here — while Bradbury lays the blame on minorities, here it is ambiguous. Who is being blamed for the pivot to censorship: offended black people, or overreacting whites?

The movie has made a subtle shift here — while Bradbury lays the blame on minorities, here it is ambiguous.

Beatty moves on to a new book. “Oh, and then Native Son comes along, and the whites didn’t appreciate that one all that much, so they burned it too.”

“Why didn’t they like it?” Montag asks, his eyes wide. Beatty looks at him, then looks away. Moments later, he intones, “We are not born equal, Guy, so we must be made equal by the fire, and then, we can be happy,” as he contemplates a copy of Mein Kampf.

The movie doesn’t attempt to explore the questions this exchange must have raised for Montag. Instead, his consciousness is expanded by reading Dostoyevsky’s Notes from Underground with his romantic interest Clarisse, who is played by the Algerian actor Sofia Boutella and who, thank God, is not a 17-year-old girl (as in the book), but a complicated double agent. When Montag finally meets up with other members of the resistance — inexplicably referred to as “Eels” throughout the movie — they ask him why he is risking everything to join them. His answer is confusing. Something about how he remembers sitting by the ocean as a kid, pouring sand endlessly through a sieve, “like my whole life passed right through me and I missed it. I’m not gonna let that happen again.” It’s a weird image — one we never see in the multiple flashbacks we get of his childhood — and it makes his motivation not one of resistance against oppression, but of self-blame.

The Literary Roots of the Incel Movement

The movie smartly updates the members of the resistance from an interchangeable band of Ivy Leaguers to a diverse group whose intellectual bona fides are not proven by their degrees, but by the books they have memorized. They’re led by Khandi Alexander, who has memorized every word of Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon. Other authors preserved by the Eels include Rumi, James Baldwin, Chairman Mao, Zadie Smith — clearly a deliberate departure from the old-school Western canon that Bradbury largely focuses on in his book. Going by his coda, he would have found this irritating: “For it is a mad world and it will get madder if we allow the minorities… to interfere with aesthetics.”

Perhaps this is why the movie never quite gels: it wants to sound the same alarm as the book, warning that control of ideas is a slippery slope, but the book exists in a time when the loudest cries of “censorship” come from a dominant culture in no real danger of being erased. The film tries to broaden the book’s definition both of literature worth saving, and of the readers fighting to save it — but it does so through winks and nudges rather than asserting this message out loud. To commit fully to Bradbury’s views on intellectual freedom is to accept an exclusionary stance that doesn’t play nicely with what few social justice-oriented moments the movie does include.

To commit fully to Bradbury’s views on intellectual freedom is to accept an exclusionary stance that doesn’t play nicely with what few social justice-oriented moments the movie does include.

Imagine, instead, a retelling that amplifies voices forgotten by the Western canon Bradbury championed. Imagine a story of a dystopian society where a person of color encountered the words of their ancestors for the first time — literature that has frequently been suppressed in real life — and found something that spoke to them personally. Imagine Khandi Alexander’s character telling us why Toni Morrison spoke to her so deeply that she committed every word to heart. Imagine Montag actually reading the words of Richard Wright and Frederick Douglass, and finding out for himself why they made white people angry. In this retelling, more readers and more voices don’t water down literature to an insipid norm. They bring it to life — bursting with powerful ideas from all different perspectives, and all the more revolutionary because of it. What an incendiary story that would be.

Always Pee After Sex with a Merman

Posted on by 007595

Several years ago, writer Chelsea Hodson introduced me to Melissa Broder’s poetry. I picked up Meat Heart, and fell in love with the collection’s apocalyptic charisma: “There appears a hinge in every young woman’s life / when ponies fly out of her soul, her tongue catches fire, / a wet corsage falls from the ceiling. Your ponytail / will not protect you.” I devoured Meat Heart and When You Say One Thing But Mean Your Mother, then pre-ordered Scarecrone, then waited for more.

In 2015, Broder revealed herself as the voice behind @SoSadToday, a darkly comic Twitter account hyped by Katy Perry and Miley Cyrus, now boasting over 650,000 followers. @SoSadToday gained popularity through its narrator’s frank yet funny tweets about depression and desire, like “love in the time of anxiety disorder”, “*whispers during sex* i hate having a body”, “fuck me in the middle of a cookie sandwich”, or (a personal favorite) “feel like satan would have sex with me and then message me 5 months later like ‘hey’ and talk about music.” After Broder’s unmasking, a poignant personal essay collection of the same name followed in 2016.

Purchase the novel

This year, Broder brings us her debut novel, The Pisces, in which an academic, Lucy, becomes enamored of a merman, Theo, on the shores of Venice Beach. The novel deals in romance, obsession, group therapy, and the complications of mer-sex.

“The difference between love and _______ is makebelieve,” Broder wrote in her 2014 poem, “Shiny Eyes.” Love, makebelieve, and blankness permeate The Pisces as well. Between Lucy’s existential anxieties and her lover’s literal tail, The Pisces is charged with mythologies both personal and universal.

Melissa Broder and I talked over the phone about physical dissolution, capitalist magic, and sex with mythical creatures, our conversation occasionally punctuated by her dog, Pickle, barking at his canine enemy down the street.

Deirdre Coyle: You’ve said that you were never a big mermaid fan. What are your favorite mythological creatures? Are there any you find more fuckable than mermen?

Melissa Broder: Not to fuck, but I love a Pegasus. Not to have sex with, just to be my companion. In terms of fucking, I would say my top is Apollo because he’s a twink, and he reminds me of a wild skater boy of the sun. We’d hook up once and then I’d never hear from him again, which is very hot.

I feel like Circe from the Odyssey. One time, I hooked up with a woman and we had the exact same boobs, and it really freaked me out. Circe turns Odysseus’ men to swine, but then she feels guilty and turns them back. And that’s something I could totally see myself doing. So I feel like Circe and I would hook up, and then we’d realize we’re very similar, and then we’d just become friends.

‘Circe’ Shows Us How Storytelling Is Power—And How That Power Can Be Seized

I think the Kraken, that giant squid? I’ve always had a thing for Ursula the Sea Witch; she’s so hot. You know that painting, The Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife? It’s hot. I mean, come on, you gotta get with the giant squid.

So I’d say those three, and maybe, if I was feeling frisky, Cerberus, the hound of hell. I just read this book called The Bridegroom Was a Dog by Yoko Tawada; it’s a New Directions book. The woman has sex with a dog, but you’re never really sure if this character is fully a dog, or just has dog attributes, you know? It’s a dog personified. And I feel that way about Cerberus; it’s not like really fucking a dog. It’s a hybrid, something with dog attributes.

I’d probably be more inclined to have sex with all of those guys before I’d have sex with a merman. But Theo is pretty hot. I’d fuck Theo.

I mean, come on, you gotta get with the giant squid.

DC: In Celtic mythology, the mermaids of are supposed to be really beautiful, while the mermen are described as being grotesque and monstrous. They’re really ugly and that may be why the mermaids prefer to hook up with sailors. That obviously doesn’t apply to Theo, because he’s hot, but I was wondering if there were any particular merpeople mythologies that you drew from while writing him?

MB: No, because I needed to create Theo the way I needed to create Theo. First of all, I needed him to be a character who would turn me on, so I could write hot sex scenes. So I built him how I wanted him to be built, and I’m sure there are mer-fundamentalists who are gonna be like, “No.” But, you know, that’s what the imagination is for. I mean, I knew some things about mer-lore and mer-mythology, but not so much about mermen, actually. I always joke, when people ask how similar I am to Lucy, I’m like, “Well, I’ve never fucked a merman, so.” But I’ve also said there are mermen on Tinder. And certainly the gross mermen you’re describing are. Recently, I keep getting hit on in the supermarket by these dudes who are the same dude over and over again. And I get really angry and mean. Not just that they’re trying to talk to me, but also because I’m like, why can’t you just be young and attractive? Then maybe I would tolerate you in stereo for a minute. I’m mad that the people who are hitting on me are the ugly mermen, and not the hot mermen.

I’m mad that the people who are hitting on me are the ugly mermen, and not the hot mermen.

DC: If you’re gonna get hit on by a rando in the supermarket, they could at least be hot.

MB: Yeah, like if a merman’s gonna hit on you in the granola bar aisle? Come on, man. So I find myself being really mean, which is interesting because in the book, Lucy has a really hard time saying “no” when she’s in sexual situations that she doesn’t like. She appears to be giving consent, right? But inside, she’s like, “Ugh.” But she doesn’t understand why she doesn’t say “no.” And I’ve felt that way too sometimes, with not only sexual situations, but also just interactions with people in the world. So it can feel really liberating to not give a fuck, and to be like, “Get away from me.”

DC: I love it. I think women are socialized to make people comfortable, and that makes it hard to yell at creeps, even when they’re objectively being creepy.

MB: Yeah. But then sometimes you’ve had enough and something takes over within you.

DC: And that’s great. Even on Lucy’s first Tinder date, she goes out with a creepy guy, and she goes home with him, but doesn’t want to have sex with him. It’s a really funny scene even though it’s also describing a very creepy reality, where she feels like she can’t leave. She watches him masturbate, and that’s her way of getting out of the situation. But she’s still having this internal monologue about wanting to leave.

MB: I’m actually writing a piece about this right now, exploring what it is within us that — when there’s no threat of violence — that doesn’t say, “Wait, stop. I don’t want to be doing this.” For myself, it’s almost like sometimes I don’t value my own reality. It’s like, “Well, let’s just finish this up and we’ll be done.” It seems easier. Instead of being like, “Stop. I’m out of here.”

DC: Not creating conflict.

MB: Yeah.

DC: Lucy gets a U.T.I. after a bad date, because she doesn’t pee after sex. It’s terrible for the character, but I love that you wrote about that. I couldn’t think of any other novel where a character gets a U.T.I., or even a yeast infection, but it’s such a common experience.

MB: Yeah, that definitely happens after not a “good” sex scene. But even with the “good” sex scenes, I’m committed to a sort of “pleasure realism,” I like to call it. Sometimes I’ll be reading erotica, or literary erotica, and the woman comes on page 121. And I’m like, I wouldn’t have come ’til page 138. Whether you’re having sex with a merman, or you’re having sex with a human, sometimes it takes a long time to have an orgasm. You should always pee after sex. And sometimes, the U.T.I. in my own life has been more profound than the sexual experience, and a more lasting memory. So I find that those details are important to include.

DC: Physical dissolution has a lot of appeal in the book, which is also something you’ve written about in your poetry, and on Twitter. There’s a scene where Lucy says, “I certainly understood the prison of the body…[I] tried to sustain that gift I had given, which was to disappear in the nothingness and thus no longer have to be aware of it.” I think that describes something difficult to put into words but extremely relatable. Do you ever find creative work to allow that sense of physical dissolution?

MB: Sometimes when you’re in the flow of writing, you do get to vanish into it. And, you know, it’s the quest for a higher power, the desire to escape oneself. I feel like it’s all the same. It’s just a question of what we make our higher power, you know? ’Cause I’ve made so many things my higher power, and Lucy obviously makes sex and love her higher power. And the problem with that is that it works really well but it’s not sustainable, because we’re reliant on something outside ourselves to get out of ourselves, when in truth, there’s also that place deep within ourselves where we can escape having a body. And it’s probably the same place that we find outside of ourselves, but it’s not contingent on anything ephemeral, or any other person, place, or thing we have to buy or ingest or consume to get there. But it seems so much easier to go outside ourselves for it, because all that shit’s right there — and who wants to go within? For myself, like Lucy, my greatest fear is disappearing, or dissolving. And my greatest wish is disappearing or dissolving. It’s like Lucy says, there are two kinds of vanishing.

For myself, like Lucy, my greatest fear is disappearing, or dissolving. And my greatest wish is disappearing or dissolving.

DC: In that vein, I also really liked the scenes about “capitalist magic” as a way to search outside yourself for that vanishing. Personally, I’m super into the idea that buying something will make me spiritually whole. And I like that that showed up at the beginning of the book, when Lucy first moves to Venice and finds the New Age store. And she kind of replaces crystals with sex and love.

MB: Yeah. And it’s all the same, right? It’s all the same. It is such a delicious thought, like, oh if I just purchase this thing, then I will be rendered whole. But then you take it home and it just becomes more crap after a while, and you just need another crystal. Not to say that I don’t love crystals, and I think they’re things of beauty, and they probably can be harnessed. But I think that when we look to anything outside ourselves to be the thing — there is no the thing. There are things. And perhaps there’s a daily recipe of different things to keep us afloat.

Venice is such a ripe place for capitalist magic. It is perhaps the epicenter. You go into the boutiques, you go into the crystal shops, and it’s like, oh, the answer is all here. I just have to buy this candle that is said to bring financial stability…for 40 dollars. So there’s a little bit of judgment about it in the book, but a lot of it’s just compassion for that human instinct. And it’s funny! It’s so human.

DC: What made you decide to set the book in Venice?

MB: Well, I lived there for four years. I was working from home, and I was three blocks from the beach, so it was almost like, I couldn’t not set the book in Venice. I was steeped in Venice. I’m actually working on another book right now and that’s set in Venice, too. Venice is such a character. I mean, I didn’t want to move to L.A. [from New York], but then I moved to Venice and really loved it. Being from the East Coast, maybe for the whole time I was living [in Venice], I was very aware of where I was living. Even living in New York, after a couple of years, I forgot I was living in New York. It’s just home, it’s just your stuff. But in Venice, I remained aware of how special it is, how unique it is, how totally nuts it is, for so many reasons.

Lucy obviously makes sex and love her higher power. And the problem with that is that it works really well but it’s not sustainable, because we’re reliant on something outside ourselves to get out of ourselves.

DC: Lucy’s relationships with women in The Pisces have a redemptive quality that provides a really nice foil to the toxic relationships that she’s having with men, especially in the beginning of the book. I was revisiting your collection, Scarecrone, after reading The Pisces, and there’s a line in the poem “Mythic” that reads, “I brought my holes and all the men / flew up inside. / What got left behind are women / who will save me.” I think Lucy’s relationship with Claire — and I don’t want to get into spoiler territory here — was a particularly interesting foil to Lucy’s romantic relationships.

MB: Yeah. I mean it’s funny because a lot of people have said, “Oh, Claire is horrific!” I’m like, Claire is the funnest friend you could ever have. I would be friends with Claire in four seconds. But I do believe in the power of women to save each other’s lives. I’ve experienced it many times over, and sometimes it can even be strangers. Sometimes — like in Lucy’s case, in group therapy — you can get the message that will save your life from someone you cannot stand. You just never know where the message is going to come from, and you only have to hear one thing. And sometimes you can be completely resistant to the messenger, and be repulsed by the messenger, perhaps because the messenger — like the women in group therapy — reflects things about you, your own vulnerabilities, and you’re like, “Ew! How can this person be putting their vulnerabilities out there?” Because you have not gotten to a comfortable place where you can put your own vulnerabilities out there, like Lucy. She’s just like, “Ugh, disgusting! So weak and unappealing.” And that’s not to say that all the characters in the group are likeable. But just because the messenger doesn’t look or seem like who we think they should look or seem like, or just because we don’t agree with everything they say, doesn’t mean they might not have one message for us that’s of profound value. And I think Lucy comes to realize that.

DC: So I kind of wanted to end on a goth note.

MB: Nice.

DC: In one scene, Theo describes Lucy as “gloomy yet charming,” and “gently death-ish.” And I felt like that could also describe your internet presence, especially with @SoSadToday, and it’s something that resonates with a lot of people. How do you find that balance in your work, between being gloomy and charming?

MB: Well, I think the ability to charm about gloom and depression is definitely a privilege. Because there have been times in my life where the window shade goes all the way up, and it’s like my eyeball is pressed against death, and there isn’t any space, or there doesn’t feel like there’s any space to charm about it. So when the blind goes down just a little, and you can get a little distance, I feel this way about writing, and it’s why I love to write and why I love humor; I love control, and there are certain things like death that I’m never gonna have control over, but that illusion of control is very sweet. And writing has given me the ability to live in that illusion of control, and that may be an illusion. But it’s also given me the ability to reframe narrative of the past, which is not so much an illusion. You get to reconstruct narrative, and you get to find out what you know. I don’t really know how I do it, and how I maintain the balance, but I can tell you why I do it. That is because I have a great fear of the unknown, and a great fear of life and death equally. Writing gives me the illusion of being moored.

7 Mysterious Libraries in Literature

Posted on by 007595

Libraries have always been mysterious, almost mystical places to me. There’s something about the sheer vastness of them, the seemingly infinite number of books they protect and keep, that inspires a sense of wonder, making each visit feel like a quest for ancient secrets. Whenever I step into one, I always wander the stacks, choosing books by some invisible pull rather than by the author’s name or the catalog. It’s not efficient, but I can’t help it. It feels more magical this way.

Purchase the novel

This fascination even crept into my debut novel, The Book of M, in which humanity has been struck down by a phenomenon that is causing people’s shadows to disappear. Amid the devastation, one of the places the survivors gather in the hope of restoring the world is a library.

Looking back, where else would those characters have gone? No other place could have been more enduring, more full of secret power, than a library. Here are seven of my favorite books set in mysterious libraries:

The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón

This novel has everything a book lover could want: a hidden library called the “Cemetery of Lost Books” that admits only the most special readers, but they can take just one book, and must become its keeper forever; a young boy in love; a father who runs a charming, crumbling bookshop; a shady antique book appraiser; a lauded author who’s disappeared, and whose work is being methodically erased from the world; and a rescued novel that becomes a dangerous quest for truth. Set against the backdrop of Barcelona during the Spanish Civil War, The Shadow of the Wind is at turns innocent, romantic, and breathlessly gripping.

Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World by Haruki Murakami

In this library, the objects kept on the shelves to be read aren’t books — they’re unicorn skulls. The novel is a split between an almost recognizable modern world and a timeless fantastical one, in which one man unlocks hidden portions of his brain to transport classified information during a data war while another wakes up memory-less in a strange, idyllic town where unicorns roam the grass outside the gates and the people living inside diligently perform their assigned civil duties without knowing why. This library is the duty that falls to the second character — he must care for the skulls and also learn to read them, for each skull contains a dream. As both men struggle to understand the forces at work, their fates slowly weave together. Dreamy and beyond explanation, it’s a little like Johnny Mnemonic meets Kafka, but with a beautiful nightmarishness that only Murakami can pull off.

The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman

In this series, a massive library that exists outside of time employs a secret sect of librarians (spies, really) to enter all the parallel universes and collect their rare and important books. Sometimes the missions are straightforward, but sometimes the books are dangerous, or magical, or have become the only copy left of their kind — which makes the collecting much more difficult. Librarian Irene finds herself in over her head when she’s tasked with collecting a particularly powerful book in a universe where magic is commonplace and exists alongside industrial technology. In addition to surviving the chaos of the city in which her book is hidden, she must learn to work with her new assistant, a gifted young man named Kai with secrets of his own, navigate the spidery web of intra-library politics, and most of all, avoid the sinister Alberich, the only librarian to have turned against the library and survived — and who is after the very same book.

The Library of Shadows by Mikkel Birkegaard

After his estranged father passes away, Jon inherits his Copenhagen bookshop and although he knows nothing about books, he decides to continue the old man’s legacy. He soon discovers that the shop actually hides a secret society of people who have the ability to work psychic magic through books. These “lectors” can trace their power back to the ultimate library of them all, the Library of Alexandria, and are divided into two categories: transmitters, who are able to transmit intense emotions to a person listening to them read, and receivers, who are able to sense word for word what any person is reading, even if they’re not speaking out loud. For centuries, these lectors have used their magic for good, but some of the more ambitious members have broken off into a faction called the Shadow Organization, to use their power for personal gain — by manipulating the minds of public figures. When more murders occur, Jon realizes his father’s death was not as innocent as it first had seemed, and that there must be a reason the Shadow Organization is now after him.

The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins

This might be the most mysterious of all the libraries on the list, because the novel’s library is also the universe. Or perhaps even more than that. The Library is ruled by a godlike figure called simply “Father,” who has divided all knowledge into twelve catalogs, which are intensely studied by one librarian each. But these librarians aren’t usual librarians — they were kidnapped as children by Father and bound to the Library — and these catalogs aren’t the usual subjects. Yes, there is one for math and engineering, but there’s also one for all possible futures, for mind control, for animal ambassadorship, and for death. One librarian can speak every language in the world, another can time travel, and yet another can create ghosts. It’s thrilling. The Library and its strange catalogs alone would have been enough to keep me reading, but when Father suddenly disappears, leaving the librarians and the world vulnerable to a plethora of divine enemies — that’s when things get really weird. Trust me when I say that this one cannot be missed.

Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore by Robin Sloan

The title of this one would make you think it’s about a bookstore rather than a library (and it is) but there’s also a wonderful vault of secret books hidden in a medieval basement, the spines literally chained to their shelves so they can’t be stolen. Clay finds himself working at a bookstore that has two faces — by day, it’s unremarkable and almost never sells anything, but by night, it’s visited by a very specific set of patrons who ask only for books from the back room. Clay soon discovers by snooping around that those books are written in code, and that there’s a secret race to unlock their contents. When he cracks the first key faster than anyone else, he suddenly finds himself sneaking into that medieval basement library and getting caught in the middle of a secret society’s obsessive quest to decipher the ultimate text.

Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Tom Sweterlitsch

This is the most sci-fi library of the bunch, but it’s just as intriguing as its more fantastical shelf-mates. The story takes place in the near future, a decade after a terrorist bombing has destroyed Pittsburgh. As a memorial to those lost, the Archive is created: an immersive, 3-D virtual simulation of the entire city before the blast, cobbled together from CCTV cameras, people’s memories, and every scrap of recovered data. Mourners and tourists alike can wander the streets, enter buildings, and see ghostly reproductions of the victims. It’s a horrifying, addictive idea that I couldn’t get enough of. Neither can the main character, Dominic a detective, who lost his wife in the attack and spends most of his time grieving and visiting fragmented scenes of her inside of the Archive. But when he discovers an anomaly in the data, that every appearance of another woman who was murdered before the bombing is being systematically deleted from the simulation, he finds himself drawn even deeper into the Archive — and into danger — than he ever could have imagined.

8 Road Trip Novels for People Who Want to Travel Without Leaving the House

Posted on by 007595

If you’re anything like me, the idea of spending hours upon hours in small metal box on wheels with either too much or too little AC does not sound like a good time. Personally, I feel carsick after fifteen minutes on the subway to work. Don’t even ask about a week long tour of scenic cornfields in the American Northwest. “But you have to road trip at least once in your life,” say my college buddies who don’t have licenses and want me to be the second driver on a speed run to Disney World. And to that I say: I have been on road trips, plenty of them. In my opinion, a vicarious road trip from the comfort of my couch is the the best road trip. Here are eight road trip novels worth a weekend at home.

On the Road by Jack Kerouac

Written in 1957, the daddy of all road trip novels traces a trip that took Kerouac and his friends across the U.S. This roman à clef features lightly fictionalized versions of some of the best known figures of the Beat generation — Allen Ginsberg, Neal Cassady, William S. Burroughs, and especially Jack Kerouac himself as the narrator Sal Paradise. Paradise makes his way through major cities across the country and comes into contact with the emerging rhythms of late twentieth century America: jazz culture, questions of gender and sexual identity, poverty crises, and the duality of loneliness with freedom on an open road.

America For Beginners by Leah Franqui

Pival Sengupta books a trip with the First Class India USA Destination Vacation Tour Company, but the only sight she wants to see is the face of her long lost son. For a year, Pival believed him to be dead — as she was told by her traditionalist husband, who could not bare the shame of a gay son. With her husband gone now too, Pival lands in New York and embarks a surprisingly challenging trek from East Coast to West, learning about the radically different country that became her son’s home and hoping that along with forging new bonds she can mend the one she lost a year ago.

The Wangs Vs. The World by Jade Chang

Rich businessman Charles Wang goes from having more money than he knows what to do with to losing his home, all but one of his cars, and his apparently tenuous grasp on the American Dream. With no money and no better options, Wang packs up his two children and their stepmother on a road trip from Bel-Air to his eldest child’s home in upstate New York. Rather than breaking the family apart, this financial catastrophe brings them closer together in a tale about defying stereotypes, navigating displacement, and discovering the meaning of “home.” In an interview with Electric Lit, Jade Chang considered her debut novel “an immigrant novel that gave the big middle finger to the traditional immigrant novel that we see in America.”

Wild: A Journey from Lost to Found by Cheryl Strayed

Call it reckless, call it insane, but at 22 years old Cheryl Strayed had a backpack and nothing tying her to home. With her mother recently deceased and her marriage wrecked, Cheryl jumped on the wildest impulse she had: a solo hike along the Pacific Crest Trail. (It’s still a road trip! Nobody said you had to be driving.) This trip would drag her through extreme weather and past deadly creatures, from the Mojave Desert in California, to Oregon, and all the way up to Washington state. It may have been dangerous, but this trip gave Cheryl the fears, pleasures, and ultimately the experiences that would heal her of past pains and teach her to survive.

As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner

A classic from the 1930s, As I lay Dying follows the Bundren family in a wild stream of consciousness ride to deliver their dead mother’s corpse to her hometown of Jefferson, Mississippi. As the July heat rots Addie Bundren in her coffin, the members of an already dysfunctional family spiral further into their own distinct brands of madness, exposing the baseness, or even at times nobility, that lies beneath the flesh. This twisted novel delves into the struggles of grief, the conflicts of familial identity, and the strange parallels between birth and death that will leave you disturbed the next time you lie down to sleep.

Flaming Iguanas by Erika Lopez

This self-described “Illustrated All-Girl Road Novel Thing” is the first in Lopez’s Mad Dog Rodriguez trilogy. Jolene “Tomato” Rodriguez hops on her motorcycle for a cross country trip from New Jersey to San Francisco in search of who knows what: love, the meaning of life, a post office? This hilariously written novel is a quick read filled great art, attitude, and quotable moments about female sexuality and wacky shenanigans. What’s not to love about punk rock women with roaring bikes?

Under the Skin by Michel Faber

Hitchhiking hasn’t been a good idea since the ’70s, but that doesn’t stop Isserley, a female driver on the Scottish Highlands, from picking up men in need of a ride. On the road, she lends a sympathetic ear to their woes and gently questions them about loved ones before knocking the innocent hitchhikers out with drugs and shipping her soon-to-be-processed food stock off to her home world. As a professional alien abductor, Isserley takes her job very seriously, which as you can guess becomes complicated when she begins to view humans less like sheep and more like her own people. Alien or not, we all deal with class divide, process beauty, and love our families in the same way. Under the Skin depicts some of the least alien aliens you’ll ever see.

The Road by Cormac McCarthy

Written by the author who we all thought died but didn’t, The Road takes place after an apocalyptic event leaves humanity near extinct, and an unnamed father and son traverse a now barren America in an attempt to survive the coming winter. As is with most apocalyptic tales these days, the greatest threat to the pair’s survival is not wild animals or the lack of wifi, but the few other humans also roaming the roads. Between cannibals, thieves, and families just as desperate as the father and son themselves, only the unfounded hope of “something better” at the end of the journey keeps them going down their path. There is nothing like a treacherous trip through a post-apocalyptic dystopian America to wreck your faith in humanity.

The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Bus Ride

Posted on by 007595

We Are the Ones on the Bus

We have been on the bus for years. The bus is modern, a double-decker coach with a narrow stairway, and can accommodate exactly one hundred passengers, not including the drivers. Each of us has a seat. Above each seat is a switch for a light and a vent for air, heating or cooling depending on the climate. Beneath each seat is an outlet for chargers and a space for a bag, about the size of an average backpack. The cushions on the seats have vibrant patterns, vaguely reminiscent of the carpeting in movie theaters. The bus is neither comfortable nor uncomfortable. The bus is neither spacious nor cramped. The bus is approximately half full. At the front of the bus is a trash receptacle, where crumpled wrappers and peels and rinds can be thrown away after meals have been eaten. At the back of the bus is a bathroom, which has a mirror where makeup can be applied in the morning and removed in the evening. We sleep in the seats, using bunched towels for pillows, sometimes wadded jackets or sweatpants. People in cars occasionally stare at us before passing us on the highway.

None of us were born on the bus. Each of us chose to board, climbing onto the bus at a desolate stop on a foggy turnpike, or a dusty road, or a sunny lane, or a rainy intersection, hurrying down the aisle with a furtive glance at the other passengers. We have been on the bus ever since. Some months ago an elderly passenger with silver stubble and tortoiseshell eyeglasses who was known to have a fondness for salted caramel candies suffered a massive coronary and perished on the stairway, spilling a handful of caramels onto the steps, and was removed from the bus later that night by a pair of paramedics, but other than that none of us have ever died on the bus. Each of us possesses a ticket, with the glorious destination printed in metallic lettering beneath the name of the company. Some of the tickets have fraying edges, worn apart by superstitious rubbing, while other tickets are in mint condition, kept in wallets for protection. In the years that we have been on the bus we have seen all manner of sights out the windows. Skyscrapers gleaming in cities with magnificent boulevards, picturesque towns, quaint villages, craggy snowcapped mountains tinted indigo by the dusk, grassy rolling hills smoldering pink in the dawn, dew glittering on plains, mist drifting across marshes, sunbathers in bikinis lying on sandy beaches, surfers in wetsuits sitting on rocky outcroppings, dark clouds flickering with heat lightning, hail falling onto streets of bobbing umbrellas, snow flurrying through crowds of hooded parkas, uniformed bands marching in spectacular parades, thrill seekers cheering on carnival rides, anglers fishing from docks crusted with barnacles, horseback riders galloping wildly across windswept ranches, gamblers streaming into shimmering casinos, sunlight sparkling across the chrome hulls in sprawling trailer parks, stars twinkling above glassy lakes teeming with rickety cottages, homey farmhouses with children climbing on rusted tractors, weathered bungalows with children swaying in hammocks between the trees, suburban mansions with children bouncing on trampolines in the yards, people standing near grain silos, people walking around water towers, curving skate ramps spattered with vivid graffiti, ancient railroad bridges overgrown with flowering weeds, fireworks, rainbows, and towering billboards. All noise from outside the bus is muffled. The inside of the bus is profoundly quiet. Conversations are held in hushed murmurs. We wear headphones when we want to listen to music. Music never plays over the speakers of the bus. The drivers rarely make announcements, only when the bus is making a pit stop at a gas station or a rest area, and even then only to announce the time that the bus will depart again. With a sense of reverence, even a feeling of anxiety, each of us makes careful note of the time announced.

We hurry off of the bus the second that the doors accordion apart. Each pit stop is exactly one hour. We have that time, and that time only, to shower, to get haircuts, to wash clothing, to buy food and toiletries and medications. Because these are the only occasions on which we are able to interact with the world beyond the windows of the bus, the pit stops are a powerful experience for us, almost transcendental. After years of nearly constant motion, the sense of motionlessness is disorienting, standing there stock-still in a gas station or a rest area, staring at a colorful display of candy bars, or salted nuts, or ice creams, or greasy frankfurters rotating behind glistening glass. The mystical churning of a slushy machine. The cryptic hum of a soda dispenser. Ordinary people chat and laugh with each other in the aisles. As we shop for supplies, we smile at the ordinary people sometimes, longing frantically for some connection. To feel kinship. To feel companionship. Though we try to look friendly, we can feel that the smiles are frightening, radiating pain and desperation.

None of us have to ride the bus. We have no obligation. We could leave the bus whenever we wanted, could join any of those happy communities of stationary people. But if we left the bus, that would mean we would never arrive where the bus is going. The possibility of reaching that destination consumes us. Casting one last glance at the gas station or the rest area, we climb back onto the bus, and we settle into the seats, hearts full of despair and ambition. The engine comes to life with a roar. The bus glides back onto the highway, and we gaze out the windows at the dazzling blur of neon and fluorescence, the headlights and taillights and glowing signs. The bus may never arrive. We know that. But the bus may arrive. We are exhilarated, are utterly enraptured, by the promise of the tickets that we possess. Even managing to find the bus once was a miracle. Some days ago as the bus pulled out of the parking lot of a truck stop at the designated time, a murmur passed through the bus, scattered gasps and exclamations, and all of us turned toward the windows in shock to see a passenger bolting from the doors of the truck stop a minute too late, her hair still damp from a shower, wearing only shorts and a bra and a single flip-flop, running after the bus with her arms outstretched, waving and pleading for the bus to come back, then stumbling over a curb and collapsing onto the pavement, shaking her head and clutching her chest and weeping as she watched the bus vanish into the distance and we watched her become part of the background. That horrible look on her face, realizing she had been left behind, is the thing that we fear most in the world.

About the Author

Matthew Baker is the author of Hybrid Creatures, a collection of stories written in hybrid languages, and the children’s novel If You Find This, which was a Booklist Top Ten Debut of 2015 and an Edgar Award Nominee for 2016. His fiction has appeared in publications such as American Short Fiction, New England Review, One Story, Electric Literature, and Best of the Net. Born in Michigan, he currently lives in New York City, where he teaches at New York University. Visit him online at: www.mwektaehtabr.com

“We Are the Ones on the Bus” is published here by permission of the author, Matthew Baker. Copyright © Matthew Baker 2018. All rights reserved.

8 Books About Alaska for People Who Don’t Watch Reality TV

Posted on by 007595

You may have heard that Alaska is large. This is true. If you cut up a map of the United States, you’d find that the next three largest states (Texas, California, and Montana) would fit within the acreage of the 49th. You may also have heard that Alaska is a frozen wasteland populated by loners who spend their time hunting caribou to feed their families and sled dogs through the ten-month winter while waiting for gold-panning season to arrive. This is not true. Alaska accounts for half of the country’s coastline and that’s where most of its population lives, in small cities and towns.

Purchase the novel

A few years ago, I decided to retrace the Harriman Expedition of 1899, in which a luxury steamship loaded with two dozen of America’s leading naturalists spent a summer following the coast of the Last Frontier. The 1899 expedition was bankrolled by railroad tycoon Edward Harriman, and traveled with a collection of 500 books on Alaska. (Unlike me, they had stevedores to carry their trunks and a comfortable smoking lounge to read in.) I connected the dots of their journey by traveling thousands of miles on the Alaska Marine Ferries (the state’s version of Greyhound buses).

By the time I was done, I’d slept in more than twenty towns and wrote a book about it: Tip of the Iceberg: My 3,000-Mile Journey Around Wild Alaska, the Last Great American Frontier. Along the way I amassed a small collection of books that collectively give a pretty good sense of what draws people to Alaska and what keeps them there. Here are eight books about Alaska, the last great American frontier:

Coming into the Country by John McPhee

This is the book that almost every Alaskan recommends when asked for suggestions, and for a good reason: no piece of writing by an Outsider (as Alaskans call those unfortunate enough to live elsewhere) better captures the forty-ninth state’s uniqueness and ethos of rugged individualism. Plus it’s funny.

Fishcamp by Nancy Lord

Outside of Anchorage and Juneau, Alaskans tend to rest up in the winter and pack as much action into the short summer months as possible. This impressionistic portrait of the rhythms of the quintessential Alaska summer activity, salmon fishing, beautifully captures the feeling of long, hard days outdoors and the satisfaction earned from what Alaskans call subsistence — feeding yourself through your own labor.

Travels in Alaska by John Muir

A million people will visit the Inside Passage on cruise ships this summer, and every one of them is going to see the spectacular mountains and glaciers that Muir introduced to the world. The vivid descriptions of nature and sense of wonder hold up well after a century. Sadly, Muir’s namesake glacier has retreated thirty miles since the Harriman Expedition saw it in 1899.

Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer

The book that launched a thousand hitchhikers. The seekers who head north searching for solitude and solace from civilization are sometimes known as “End of the Roaders.” Krakauer brilliantly captures the allure of Alaska’s remoteness, and the skepticism the state’s residents feel toward those who arrive unprepared to survive when nature gets angry.

If You Lived Here, I’d Know Your Name by Heather Lende

Lende is a newspaper reporter (among other occupations; Alaskans are champion multi-taskers) in Haines, and her book’s title is strictly factual. Alaskan towns are filled with quirky characters of every sociopolitical stripe, and they tend to get along out of necessity.

Not One Drop by Riki Ott

This account by environmentalist Ott of the crisis and aftermath of the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster tells how the town of Cordova — reachable only by air or water — was nearly destroyed by corporate malfeasance.

Going to Extremes by Joe McGinniss

McGinniss spent a year living and traveling in Alaska around the time oil began to flow through the Trans-Alaska Pipeline in the late 70s. But the portraits he paints of dreamers and dropouts and the plans they made for One Big Score could have been written yesterday.

Pilgrim’s Wilderness by Tom Kizzia

Not everyone who comes north to live off the grid is a lovable goofball. This chilling account tells the story of Papa Pilgrim, a fundamentalist Christian with fifteen children, a very dark past, and little patience for government interference in his affairs.

Just Admit It, You Wrote a Memoir

Posted on by 007595

In March, I attended a conversation between Sheila Heti and Chris Kraus at the Murmrr Ballroom in Brooklyn. During the Q&A, a woman writer from the audience asked the two how they think about the lines between memoir, fiction, and “autofiction,” or fictionalized autobiography — a question that the asker said she struggled with herself. Heti and Kraus were unanimous on a few points: that autofiction is a needless term, as all fiction draws on the writer’s experience, and that memoir is “repugnant.”

Listening to their responses, I was struck by the strength of their objections to “memoir.” I related — my own forthcoming book, drawn from my life, is subtitled “A Novel from Poems” rather than “A Memoir,” because I balked at the term, which felt heavy and in some ways inaccurate. But Heti and Kraus seemed to hate the term with a fervor that surprised me. I returned to a question I’ve asked myself many times before: Why are we so uncomfortable with memoir? Why does the word itself sound both sentimental and unserious? And why do women writers in particular feel so compelled to reject that label even when their narrators share their names and friends and professions?

Why are we so uncomfortable with memoir? Why does the word itself sound both sentimental and unserious?

Of course, it would be an exaggeration to say that memoir is generally hated. Really, the opposite is true. In The Limits of Autobiography, Leigh Gilmore argues that, at the turn of the millennium, memoir became “the genre”: she notes that, between the 1940s and the 1990s, the number of new autobiographies and memoirs released per year tripled; in addition, scholars joined novelists and memoirists in the writing about personal experience. Now, autobiographies from celebrities and politicians regularly top nonfiction best-seller lists, and much of the growth in book sales is attributed to nonfiction.

But that boom in memoir is accompanied by a discomfort with it — and judgment of it. Even the slipperiness between the respectable term “autobiography” and the more treacly-sounding “memoir” tells us as much.

The word “memoir” has straightforward origins — it comes from the French mémoire, memory. But Heti and Kraus’ visceral reaction to the term indicates that it has taken on a much more specific meaning. The two writers explained their distaste for the genre in similar ways: Heti said that a memoir is not symbolic (a point she reiterated in a recent interview). Kraus said that a memoir attempts to tell the story of one life, and that she is more interested in dialogue and relationships.

At other points in their conversation, they touched on a related topic: Heti said that readers often mistake her novel How Should a Person Be for self-help, and then tell her she wasn’t helpful — that she isn’t qualified to give them advice. This is another assumption about memoir: that its writers suggest they have lived exemplary lives, ones others may want to strive and imitate. (Some readers may even assume that young people cannot and should not write memoirs.) Our celebration of the lives of the rich and famous must contribute to this conception, and the current boom in self-help books, how-to guides, and inspirational literature compounds it further. This may seem to be a bit of a contradiction: memoir has negative associations with sentimentality, yet also demands of its authors the demonstration of expertise. And perhaps this very contradiction is part of what makes the term seem weighty, if not repugnant.

Objections to memoir thus paint it as a limited genre, one that tries to make sense of an individual life in a neat, straightforward way so that it can serve as an example. Listening to Heti and Kraus, it feels that memoir is pitted against writing that is “literary” (symbolic, shaped, crafted), formally experimental, and innovative. By following the path of a singular life so closely, they argue, it closes itself off to the stranger details and contradictions that make lives and literature interesting in the first place.

Objections to memoir paint it as a limited genre, one that tries to make sense of an individual life in a neat, straightforward way.

Indeed, recent works of nonfiction or fiction drawn from life go by many other names: we call Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts “auto-analysis,” Heidi Julavits’ The Folded Clock a “diary,” Heti’s How Should a Person Be “a novel from life.” I read lots of essay collections, and have noticed that their fragmented forms save them from the label “memoir,” too.

And of course, there is that other term “autofiction,” writing about the self that refuses the label of nonfiction altogether. Kraus said that all fiction comes from a writer’s experience; why do we need a special term for it? There’s a logic to this argument — no one would call James Joyce’s The Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man autofiction, after all. While the term has been attached to many celebrated (male) writers — Sebald, Amis — it can also serve to imply that a novelist has taken the easy way out, simply changing around some details from their life instead of coming up with something truly creative and new. In the introduction to a special issue of Women and Performance (1999), Leslie Satin writes that autobiography “has been feminized.” Satin goes on: “This feminized state has perpetuated the criticism so often leveled at female writers of fiction, that their writings are, however veiled, (merely) autobiographical.” For women writers who have faced this charge, it makes sense to reject any label that implies their work is merely self-oriented — to insist that their books are not autofiction, but fiction.

The literary and the autobiographical have had a vexed history since well before the late 20th-century memoir boom. At the height of Modernism, T. S. Eliot’s “Traditional the Individual Talent” and Gertrude Stein’s The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas both demonstrated their culture’s distaste for autobiography, memoir, and “confessional” literature, albeit in different ways. Eliot argues that writing from one’s personal experience prevents one from contributing to and reshaping literary tradition. Stein’s fictional autobiography of her partner, by contrast, is a send-up of autobiography as a genre. Throughout, the fictional narrator, Toklas, shares Stein’s thoughts on autobiography:

For some time now many people, and publishers, have been asking Gertrude Stein to write her autobiography and she had always replied, not possibly. She began to tease me and say that I should write my autobiography. Just think, she would say, what a lot of money you would make. She then began to invent titles for my autobiography. My Life with the Great, Wives of Geniuses I have Sat With, My Twenty-five Years With Gertrude Stein.

Stein knows an autobiography could bring her fame and wealth, but as a literary innovator, a “genius,” it’s distasteful. However, she encourages her partner to write one: Toklas, the “wife” in their relationship, could write about her feminized perspective — her time with other wives, her time observing Stein’s genius. And so, in a send-up of the genre, Stein simply writes from Toklas’ perspective. The book was immensely popular, because of its satire against autobiography, as well as because of its real disclosures of modernist friendships and conflicts: the book includes conversations with Picasso, and criticisms of Hemingway.

By the time that Eliot and Stein rejected the personal, memoir had begun to be coded as female. Memoir flourished as a genre in the 19th century, and by the early 20th century, was mainstream. Romanticists wrote from personal experience, and John Stuart Mill and others wrote spiritual autobiographies. When Oscar Wilde was questioned about his plays while on trial for indecent behavior, the line between autobiography and fiction became a legal question, and his autobiographical De Profundis, written from prison, inflamed public interest in his relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas, and associated the genre with homsexuality (then “sexual inversion”) in the public imagination. Women writers of the period also included autobiographical elements in their novels and periodical publications. Regardless of the gender of the writers, the genre itself became negatively associated with the feminine as it became popular.

Regardless of the gender of the writers, the genre itself became negatively associated with the feminine as it became popular.

As Andreas Huyssen and others have argued, modernism constructed itself in opposition to a mass culture that it strongly coded as female. It is well-chronicled that Eliot and his contemporaries rejected the 19th century to make literature new; in After the Great Divide, Huyssen argues that modernism associated “inferior literature” with one set of terms — it is “subjective, emotional, passive,” and female” — and “genuine, authentic literature” with another — it is “objective, ironic, “in control of…aesthetic means,” and male. (It does not escape me that the history of modernism I outline here is a particular history, and a white history. I focus on it here not to exclude other modernisms, but to trace the history of a dominant cultural narrative that I think influences our definitions and associations today.)

In the early 20th century, memoir’s very popularity made it sentimental, naïve, and “easy” (to read and to write). Modernism opposed itself to those terms, and when modernist writers did write from their life experience, their work blurred the line between truth and fiction, memory and invention, enough to evade the labels “memoir” and “autobiography.”

Moving into the mid–20th century, audiences continued to crave memoir; it seemed to intersect with the literary once again with the rise of the Confessional School. It’s worth remembering, though, that even Sylvia Plath said her famous poem “Daddy” was “spoken by a girl with an Electra complex” — as in, another girl, but not herself. For years, women writers like Stein and Plath have performed confession while also denying it.

For years, women writers like Stein and Plath have performed confession while also denying it.

Now, a century after the initial ascent of literary modernism and on the other side of deconstruction and postmodernism, one might assume that “memoir” has taken on new valences — that the literary/innovative is no longer so opposed to the subjective or to the “popular.” That “women’s writing” has no less value than that other, adjective-free “writing.” A recent resurgence of essay collections, as well as the reception of the innovative nonfiction titles I’ve mentioned, suggests we’ve made some progress. We prize “difficulty” much less than we used to, and are more open to the idea that all selves are constructed, whether in literature or in life. But the continuing negative connotations of the term “memoir” suggests to me that we have a way to go towards dismantling the idea that self-referential work has less value because of its appeal to readers who identify as women.

First, I wonder if it might be time to reconsider memoir’s association with self-help. When an author presents her life as potentially instructive, does it have to be didactic? Heti’s new novel Motherhood seems to hold open the promise of non-didactic self-help. I don’t mean to suggest that the book is not a novel or that it should be labeled memoir. However, it’s obvious that many readers and reviewers have struggled to separate the narrator from Heti herself, and have read it as a treatise of whether or not to have a child. Indeed, I know many friends and acquaintances reading it hoping to get advice. On Instagram, Miranda July says it is:

A book for all of you who are considering having a baby, who had a baby, who didn’t have a baby, who didn’t want a baby, who don’t know what they want but the clock is ticking anyway. This topic is finally tackled as if it were the most important decision in your life. Because, um. How lucky are we that one of our foremost thinkers took this upon herself, for years, in real time, wrestling every day and living to tell.

Heti, July implies, thinks through this from her own perspective to help the reader in their own thinking — as undecided and undecidable as the question of motherhood may remain, even for Heti herself. And why shouldn’t writers acknowledge that readers want this?

Beyond literary fiction, I think about literary self-help columns including Cheryl Strayed and Steve Almond’s Dear Sugar, Dorothea Lasky and Alexander Dimitrov’s Ask the Astro Poets, and Heather Havrilesky’s Ask Polly. These writers carefully read the letters and follow-up with advice that draws on their own experience as readers and writers (and, in the case of Lasky and Dimitrov, astrologers). There’s a hunger for well-wrought advice from writers, I think — and it doesn’t have to answer a question definitively. While self-help may demand a standard of perfection from the individual who doles it out, these writers’ columns (and podcasts) suggest that our standard is changing: we want advice from writers who can admit their flaws and mistakes. Often, seeing a writer think through the problem through the lens of their own experience is what’s most valuable. So why shouldn’t works of memoir and literary fiction acknowledge that readers often seek advice and help? Advice can stem from writer’s experience, as well as the gaps, contradictions, and uncertainties in that experience. I’d like to see more work of this kind — experimental self-help literature.

Why shouldn’t works of memoir and literary fiction acknowledge that readers often seek advice and help?

Second, I wonder what would happen if women and nonbinary writers with literary sensibilities embraced that “women’s genre,” memoir. After all, our lives are all shaped by the symbolic significance we inscribe to certain experiences, relationships, and objects. Our personal histories contain much more than fact: they’re also constructed of out the lies we tell ourselves, knowingly and unknowingly; by the things we distort; by our dreams and fantasies and delusions. We know that our memories contain so much more than truth; what if we let our memoirs do so, too?

Are Conservative Titles Using Shady Tricks to Get Onto the Bestseller List?

Posted on by 007595

The pen is mightier than the sword. But what about the dagger? Conservative titles are showing up on the New York Times bestseller list marked with dagger symbols (this one: †), which indicate that a book cracked the top sellers thanks to bulk orders. In other words, people are buying several dozen or more books at a time. Does this mean something a little weird is going on? Well, it might.

The method by which the New York Times compiles its list of best sellers is shrouded in as much mystery as the recipe for Coca Cola or the number of licks to the center of a Tootsie Pop. According to the New York Times’s own “About the Best Sellers” info page, the Times gets the data for its list from specific book vendors who remain, for the most part, confidential. Though the numbers aren’t verified, it’s believed you have to sell between 5,000 and 10,000 books in a week to vendors in the paper’s established “book universe,” which includes “well-established vendors as well as emerging ones. The sales venues for print books include national, regional and local chains representing tens of thousands of storefronts; many hundreds of independent book retailers; scores of online and multimedia entertainment retailers; supermarkets, university, gift and big-box department stores; and newsstands.” When we reached out for clarification, the Times gave us a simile: “If we were to equate The New York Times best seller lists with covering baseball, we would include the major leagues, minor leagues and all the way down to the little leagues while doing what we can to exclude any attempts made by people to manipulate the lists.”

Because people do try to manipulate the list. A lot. The list is easy to scam if you’re okay with some public scorn. Mitt Romney bulked up his numbers by requiring his book tour hosts to sell between $25,000 and $50,000 worth of his 2010 book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness. The most recent public scamming strategy was carried out by the author of Handbook for Mortals, Lani Sarem. The book made it to the top of the Fiction Bestseller List, beating out The Hate U Give, without even being available for sale. (As some consolation, the book was eventually removed from the bestseller list.) How did Lani Sarem get on the list? By calling up independent bookstores to confirm they were reporting their sales to The New York Times, and then ordering specific quantities of books through those stores — orders large enough to make an impact but small enough to fall under the bulk order radar.

Here’s where the dagger comes in. The New York Times knows its system for gathering weekly data is open to abuse, which is why it’s come up with the dagger system. If the New York Times believes a book has made its way onto the list in a way that seems “suspicious,” it places a small dagger symbol next to the title: “Institutional, special interest, group or bulk purchases, if and when they are included, are at the discretion of The New York Times Best-Seller List Desk editors based on standards for inclusion that encompass proprietary vetting and audit protocols, corroborative reporting and other statistical determinations. When included, such bulk purchases appear with a dagger (†).”

These daggers are important to watch, because they indicate that someone is paying a lot of money to make sure books such as The Empire State by the political commentator Jerome R. Corsi (a book on the secret conspiracy to undermine the Trump presidency) get on the list, regardless of how many people actually read them.

Emily Pullen, a former manager at WORD bookstore in Brooklyn and current receiving administrator for the New York Public Library Shop, brought our attention to some of the titles ending up on the Bestseller Nonfiction List for April 22nd. There are a lot of conservative titles on the list. But conservative titles have a tendency to sell a lot of copies, so that’s not a cause for concern. However, look right next to four of the titles, and there’s that little dagger.

Striking but not totally out of the ordinary. After all, the symbol was incorporated in part because there is a precedent for this kind of spurious behavior. But when a bestseller from that week— Our 50 State Border Crisis by Howard Buffet — showed up at the New York Public Library with a donation slip from Howard G. Buffet’s own non-profit foundation, Pullen wondered whether Buffet was bulk-ordering his way onto the list using his organization’s funds. Pullen posted this Instagram (below) of a letter she found in a book donated to the library. She wrote: “The author’s nonprofit foundation bought the book through B&N and had it shipped to a branch library’s donation center.” She speculates that: “They purchase in a way that gets reported to NYT, can write it off most likely, and maybe it will get into circulation at a library.”

We reached out to Emily Pullen and Barnes & Noble for comment, but neither responded to us before the publication of this piece.

Why does it matter? Well, whether we like it or not, the list has a lot of power when it comes to book sales and author preeminence. While there are many best seller lists out there, with their own (often more transparent) methodologies, it means a lot to be able to call oneself a “New York Times Best Selling Author.” According to a report cited by Vox, to appear on the Times list can change a writer’s career: “Appearing on the New York Times’s best-seller list increased debut authors’ sales by 57 percent. On average, it increased sales by 13 or 14 percent.” The list also has a lot of cultural power for readers: if a book shows up on the New York Times list, there’s an imperative (in certain circles) that you know about it. In my own experience working at a bookstore this was true. Every week we’d receive the New York Times Book Review, and turn to the best seller list. We had to make sure we had copies of every book on the list in the store. And sure enough, that same weekend people would come in looking for those books more than any other.

When we reached out to the New York Times Best Seller Desk to learn more about how they use discretion when including those titles on the bestseller list, we got what appears to be a standard reply from the desk:

“Our best-seller lists and the editorial decisions of The Times’s book editors and critics are entirely independent…This means our lists are not a judgment of literary merit made by the editors of the best-seller lists, who remain impartial to the results. These are best-seller lists, not best-reviewed lists.”

And on the breakdown of political titles:

“In the last year, politicians and commentators who identify as conservative have performed as well as, if not better than, liberal ones on our lists…The author who has had the most rankings at №1 and greatest number of rankings on our hardcover nonfiction list is Mr. [Bill] O’Reilly, the noted conservative commentator. Since the spring of 2008, he has spent 57 weeks at №1 on our hardcover nonfiction list and ranked over 1,272 times across all of our lists.”

Whether we like it or understand it or believe it’s fair, the New York Times best seller list is something we should pay attention to if we care about how books get around to the people who need them and read them. The pen is mighty. But so are these daggers. And in a political climate mired in media controversy, it’s more important than ever that we look out for where the daggers get drawn.

The Literary Roots of the Incel Movement

Posted on by 007595

One month ago yesterday, Alek Minassian drove through a Toronto shopping district in a rented van, killing ten people and injuring sixteen more. Analysis of Minassian’s online activity — where he participated in forums for the involuntarily celibate, or incels — quickly revealed the attack’s motivation: he was avenging himself on the women (apparently all of us) who had rejected him. He declared that with his act of terrorism, the “incel rebellion” had begun — although he was not the first self-described incel to use his sexlessness as an excuse for acts of mass violence.

Though the subsequent rash of media analysis might lead you to think otherwise, none of this is new — not even the term “incel,” which was first coined in 1993 by a queer Canadian woman when she created a website for people who identified as involuntary celibates to share their thoughts and feelings. The incel community that exists today on reddit, 4chan, and incel.me is an inchoate and ever-evolving group, which seems to change shape with every attempt to characterize it. The genealogy of today’s incel grows more complex the more you dig (he is descended from both the aggressively misogynist Pick Up Artist community and the slightly more sympathetic “love-shy” community). What members of all these groups share, of course, is their sense of their own alienation from women and their (almost always deeply misogynistic) conviction that this alienation has negatively affected their lives in myriad profound ways.

The sentiments offered by participants in such forums range from standard misogynist cliche, to violent hatred for women, to deep ambivalence and confusion about all aspects of human sexuality. At best, these communities are desperately sad and at worst — and lately we’ve been seeing them at their worst — incel and related forums rationalize and even celebrate the rape and murder of women, and advocate state mandated “sexual redistribution of women” (the rationale behind which, amazingly, has been echoed by several prominent right-wing thinkers lately).

I am writing this on May 23rd, the fourth anniversary of Elliot Rodger’s Isla Vista spree killing, a set of murders explicitly motivated by the perpetrator’s extreme hatred of women and the men he perceived as more sexually successful than he. As of the time of writing, 10:09 am, there are multiple posts on the front page of incel.me celebrating Rodger as a hero (many more will surely show up throughout the day). Posters are discussing what kind of vanilla latte Rodger would have liked (hot or cold), congratulating each other on the anniversary (which they’re calling “The Supreme Gentleman’s Day” and “The Day of Retribution”), and making playlists of his favorite songs (they call these ’80s pop songs “Elliotcore”). Where did these young men get the idea that male pathos (stereotypically defined by them as sexual frustration) is so pathetic, so worthy of tribute? One possible answer to the question, one we don’t discuss very much, is our culture’s literary history. The incel isn’t just a monstrous birth of our casually cruel and anonymous internet culture. He is also a product of Anglo-American literary culture, which (particularly in the twentieth century) treats the topic of male sexual frustration as if it is of prime importance to us all.

The incel is a product of a literary culture that treats the topic of male sexual frustration as if it is of prime importance to us all.

Think of the literature you read in high school. One source of Hamlet’s insanity, those around him find it natural to assume, is his sexual frustration with Ophelia. Multiple characters in the play scheme to bring the two together, hoping that if she puts out he’ll calm the fuck down and not kill everyone. The plots of a number of other “classic” novels, from Great Expectations and A Tale of Two Cities to The Great Gatsby, are driven by a (white) male character’s frustrated desire with a remote woman. Holden Caulfield’s ramble through New York is punctuated by his obsessive recollections of Jane Gallagher, the girl he respected too much to try to fuck. Tim O’Brien’s collection The Things They Carried lingers on the story of Jimmy Cross and his obsession with a woman named Martha, whom he knew before he was drafted. Cross is depicted as a genuine figure of pathos: a normal, relatable man caught in a terrible position who uses fantasy as a way to manage the horrors of his war experience. He remembers touching Martha’s knee one night, and how she had recoiled. As he recalls this scene, he fantasizes about having “done something brave.” “He should’ve,” he thinks, “carried her up the stairs to her room and tied her to the bed and touched that left knee all night long.” That his fascination with her takes the form of a rape fantasy is later revealed to be doubly significant. It is not just evidence of his resentment towards her for rejecting him, but also, we later learn, proof that he has somehow intuited the history of sexual trauma that lives behind her veneer of disassociation, her eyes which are always “wide open, not afraid, not a virgin’s eyes, just flat and uninvolved.”

I choose The Things They Carried to pick on here because it’s a favorite of mine. I think it’s brilliant, but it offers a prime example of the way our literary culture has long treated rage and aggression as if they are normal features of (white) male sexuality. (The racial component is of course significant here, since the exact opposite has long been true for depictions of black male sexuality, which have been represented as essentially and problematically aggressive.) The literature we choose to teach our children evidences how untroubled we are by this disturbing cliché that rage and a fascination with violation are characteristic features of (again, white) male sexuality. This is of course one of the main points of O’Brien’s beautiful book, but it doesn’t change the fact that as a teenager I had read many fictional accounts of men’s rape fantasies long before I had ever read a literary account from the woman’s perspective of rape, or even of consensual sex. I was trained to accept that male sexual frustration was a serious issue because I read hundreds of pages about it before the age of 20, far more than I read about issues of undoubtedly greater social import, like the legacy of slavery, the alienation of women and people of color from public life, or the violence of the settler colonialism on which the United States was founded. Perhaps these novels even coached me into taking male sexual frustration seriously through a kind of frightful education: look what happens, they seemed to say, when men don’t get what they want.

The plots of a number of “classic” novels are driven by a (white) male character’s frustrated desire with a remote woman.

And these are just the books I read in high school. Don’t even get me started on D.H. Lawrence, Somerset Maugham, Ernest Hemingway, Harold Pinter, Henry Miller, Saul Bellow, Vladimir Nabokov, John Updike, Norman Mailer, Bret Easton Ellis, or the patron saint of elevating male bullshit: David Foster Wallace. (Don’t @ me; I don’t care.) Though many of these authors are justly celebrated, they have all repeatedly treated male sexual frustration as if it deserves pride of place among the great issues of Life. Lolita even succeeds in conjuring sympathy for the desires of a pedophile. (Gregor von Rezzori famously called it “the only convincing love story of our century” in Vanity Fair, a quotation which has long been emblazoned on the cover of the Vintage edition of the novel.) By contrast, novels of women’s frustration with society — not sex — like those of Edith Wharton and Kate Chopin, are classed as special interest pieces: feminist fiction, or women’s fiction, not Great American Novels.

This all becomes even more ironic when we consider the history — not literary, but real — of identifying women’s sexual frustration as the psychological problem of hysteria. For hundreds of years, women were literally committed because of a “disease” that male doctors attributed to a handful of sexual causes: women with hysteria were either not getting fucked enough, had been fucked by the wrong people, had wanted to fuck the wrong people, or had just plain wanted to fuck too much. It’s hardly an insight to say that men have been telling women about how they should behave sexually forever, and that usually their instructions are geared to benefit their own pleasure or politics. That today’s most visible forms of misogyny, however, reverse the traditional rationale about female sexuality — it’s not that we need to get fucked more for our own good, but for the good of a nation plagued by mass shootings perpetrated by lonely men — just goes to show that this kind of misogyny cuts across political and ideological categories. I think our most celebrated and most taught literature also shows that. After revisiting the books that I was first introduced to as “great novels,” I see that many of them rehearse and even promote the idea that male sexual suffering (often represented by deprivation) is a public concern, while female sexual suffering (often represented by trauma) is a private, psychological issue. In literature, time and again, men — both writers and characters — elevate their pathos by revealing it. By contrast, female pathos marks a text as niche, as “confessional,” as minor.

The ‘great novels’ rehearse and even promote the idea that male sexual suffering is a public concern, while female sexual suffering is a private, psychological issue.

This is more extreme version of a broader phenomenon described by Rebecca Solnit (among others): “A book without women is often said to be about humanity but a book with women in the foreground is a woman’s book.” This is the same logic that allows us to unreflectively give teenagers The Catcher in the Rye instead of The Bell Jar, because Salinger’s book seems to have universal appeal, while Plath’s is an account of pathology (when in reality, of course, both books tackle the protagonist’s mental illness). It is the same logic that meant I wasn’t exposed to the novels of Alice Walker, Margaret Atwood, Marilynne Robinson, or Toni Morrison until college. It is the same logic that recently allowed Gay Talese to argue publicly that he had not been influenced by any female writers (as if that’s possible). In short, literary culture has long been complicit in upholding the structures by which we imagine men to be more worthy of attention and thus more human.

In both life and literature, we lock up women who are dangerously sexually frustrated for the (supposed) good of themselves and the good of the community, but we ask the community to adapt to and accommodate male sexual suffering. We regularly ask teenage girls to read books in which characters degrade women, expecting them to understand that the book’s other merits outweigh its misogyny. To set such an expectation and not consider its effect on young woman is foolish and hypocritical; we rarely expect young men to do the same, and hardy ever expect young white men to read extensively in traditions where their identities aren’t represented or are degraded. We need to reflect on the way the literature we celebrate supports the idea that women who are sexually frustrated create problems for themselves, while men in the same situation create problems for the world. Though the links are subtle, our celebration of a canon of sad white boy literature affects the way we think, and how much tolerance we offer to men like Alek Minassian and Elliot Rodger.

Our celebration of a canon of sad white boy literature affects the way we think, and how much tolerance we offer to men like Alek Minassian.

We have been told recently that there is a crisis in masculinity in America, and that we should be worried about it. We have been subjected to ideologues using this “crisis” as impetus to consider radically regressive ideas about sexuality. We can counteract this fearmongering by remembering the misogyny of the canon, which reveals to us that we have always worried about male sexual frustration more than we need to (or at least, more than we worry about more widely devastating social issues). We have always treated the alienation of men as if it deserved thousands of pages of analysis, perhaps because we feared it had the power to endanger us all. (Because, as Margaret Atwood famously put it, “men worry that women will laugh at them, and women worry that men will kill them.”) Reassessing the canon allows us to see that one of the reasons why “he was a lonely virgin” sounds like reasonable justification to us for a spree killing is that we have long valorized male isolation. Our literary canon treats such desire as if it is a (if not the) central topic in the lives of white men. It treats the frustration of male desire as if it merits exploration time and again. Maybe people like Jordan Peterson and Ross Douthat (two mainstream writers who have recently entertained the possibility that society would benefit from “sex redistribution”) wouldn’t think male isolation was a privileged social problem (rather than an individual psychological problem) if our literary culture didn’t also support that idea. Maybe Donald Trump wouldn’t have won the presidency in a country that didn’t worry so much about what white men think all the time.

I’m not saying that we need to divest entirely from the mid-century authors like Pinter, Bellow, Updike, and Roth who have so shaped American literary culture (though I’d personally be cool with letting Hemingway, Ellis, and Wallace drift into obscurity). But I do think it’s time to be done with this particular story, which treats white male rage as a ceaseless source of interest. Perhaps we already are done with this story, and instead of representing a generation-wide crisis in masculinity, the incels are just the dudes who haven’t gotten over the fact that we’ve gotten over them. In that case, we might view their terrorism (or even the affront to civil rights represented by Trump’s win) not as the beginning of an uprising but as the last gasps of a defeated army.

It’s time to be done with this particular story, which treats white male rage as a ceaseless source of interest.

I’m not naive enough to think that we will ever read or write misogyny out of existence, but I hope that more of us (especially men) will start reading more widely, start balancing books like American Psycho with books like Chris Krauss’s equally nimble satire of American life, I Love Dick. If I am right that there are subtle but real connections between mainstream literary structural misogyny and violent subcultures like that of the incel, then perhaps our lives actually depend on it.