Eight SF&F Road Trip Novels to Get You Ready for Mad Max: Fury Road

For some, the Mad Max movies set the tone for grungy, violent post-everything cinematic science fiction. For others, these movies might be remembered hazily as the butt of Mel Gibson jokes and the triumph of one really, really good Tina Turner song. Either way, Mad Max is back this weekend with the release of the new film (no one knows what to call it: Reboot? Recharge? Cash grab?) Mad Max: Fury Road. Like its predecessors — Mad Max, The Road Warrior, and Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome — Mad Max: Fury Road is an original screenplay that is not based directly on any novel or short story. And yet, a dark and fantastical road trip is something that crops up in plenty of science fiction and fantasy novels. Here are eight fantastic road trip books to give your Mad Max diet a little more literary flavor.

The Dead Lands

The Deadlands by Benjamin Percy

Set in a devastated future America, Ben Percy’s new novel might be the literary equivalent of a Mad Max-style narrative. The novel is a re-imagining of the path taken by Lewis & Clark, but plotted through a dystopian, bombed-out version of the West. Part political thriller, part survival story, Ben Percy has proven again (as he did with the werewolf novel Red Moon) that he is one of the best contemporary genre-benders out there.

The Hobbit cover

The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien

Tolkien is obsessed with road trips! If you don’t believe me think about this: the subtitle (or alternate title) to this book is actually “There and Back Again.” True, there’s some battles with various armies toward the end of this book, but what’s a magical road trip without some dwarf-war action? Tolkien liked this format so much that one could also argue that the entirety of the Lord of the Rings is a massive road trip too. Most of us wouldn’t want to take a road trip to a giant volcano where a certain Dark Lord was hanging out, but then again, maybe we would?

Monica Byrnes novel

The Girl in the Road by Monica Byrne

Definitely not a vision of the future that is apocalyptic (post or otherwise), Byrne’s 2014 novel bridges a futuristic India and Africa with a literal futuristic bridge. Told from two parallel narratives, occurring at different times, Byrne science fiction future is certainly dark, but it’s not exactly the same level of cynicism you might normally associate with a near-future novel.

Logan's run cover

Logan’s Run by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson

While the film adaptation of this book sees Logan and Jessica escaping an enclosed city to discover a decimated Washington D.C. around them, the novel is totally different. There is no enclosed city, but instead an entire futuristic and totally insane America which can be traversed by a high-powered underground subway. From the East Coast to North Dakota, and eventually even to the planet Mars, the 1967 book version of the iconic 1976 film is really, really BIG.

green lantern

Green Lantern/Green Arrow “Hard Traveled Heroes” by various

If you’re worried ever about superhero narratives just not being down-to-Earth enough, then check out this memorable storyline from the 70’s. Here, Green Arrow convinces Green Lantern and Green Lantern’s outer-space bosses that it’s time to see how America really lives. Everybody gets into a pick-up truck and drives across America discovering mostly economic and racially charged injustices. While reading a little clumsy and preachy today, it’s still hard to wrap your mind around the fact that DC even attempted this concept. The politics are super left and totally on the nose, which makes it not only a great historical comic artifact, but also a really compelling read.

Mockingjay cover

Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins

The last book in The Hunger Games trilogy is also a road trip of sorts. In an attempt to restore freedom to Panem, Katniss, Gale and her coterie of freedom fighters go on a variable tour of each of the “Districts” of this post-apocalyptic world. Though vaguely believed to some version of North America, Collins never tells us outright where and what Panem is specifically. Like a lot of great science fiction dystopias, the various cultural trappings of each of the 12 (well, sometimes 13) districts serves a political and sociological analog to real life problems. One-percenters are certainly a target of both Katniss’s arrows and Collins’s prose, but figuring out where they live versus everyone else is what makes this kind of world building a perfect blend of analogy and imagined reality.

Harry Potter cover

Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling

Whoa! Do the ends of popular “kid’s” series always result in a giant road trip? Breaking with the format of every single previous Harry Potter novel, Rowling sent Harry, Ron, and Hermione on a full-on quest across a England. Notably, a lot of this has the Hogwarts wizards chilling out in the “non-magical” world, trying to keep a lid on their wand-waving ways. But, the book is also a grand tour of all sorts of stuff that was mentioned in previous installments, including the house where Harry’s parents were murdered, a favorite pub in Hogsmeade, and more. My favorite part of reading Deathly Hollows when it first came out was thinking to myself “they’re not out of the woods yet,” and then realizing the characters were literally camping in the woods.

The Road by Cormac McCarthy

The Road by Cormac McCarthy

You knew this one was going to be on here. We couldn’t resist. You get one guess as to why this is a sci-fi/fantasy road trip that should remind you of Mad Max.

Miss Marple vs. the Mansplainers: Agatha Christie’s Feminist Detective Hero

The Murder at the Vicarage

By 1960, Agatha Christie was apparently exhausted with male know-it-alls. She had grown to despise her most famous detective, Hercule Poirot, whom she described as “an egocentric creep.” But her readers had loved the high maintenance Poirot since his first appearance in 1920 — his perfectly groomed moustache, his patent leather shoes, his delicate stomach — so much that he was the only fictional character ever to receive an obituary in the New York Times. It must have been a relief for Christie, in novels starting with The Murder at the Vicarage in 1930, to write about Miss Marple, her little old lady heroine, whose quiet expertise in the comings and goings of village life and the universality of human nature made her an unlikely master detective. She said that Miss Marple and Poirot never solved a mystery together because “Poirot, a complete egoist, would not like being taught his business or having suggestions made to him by an elderly spinster lady.”

Most men don’t, but the twinkling irony with which Miss Marple nudges blustering, blowhard cops in the right direction demonstrates how the Queen of Crime inherited just as much from Jane Austen as Arthur Conan Doyle, employing the sly humor that is a hallmark of British domestic fiction. Christie’s Miss Marple mysteries are ones in which female news and knowledge are vindicated, throwing a smiling side eye at mansplanations and male authorities. Miss Marple’s wisdom is overtly feminine — she relies on her knowledge of the domestic sphere, of relationships — and her methods are equally so, as she exercises her keen women’s intuition. “Intuition,” she says, “is like reading a word without having to spell it out.”

Miss Marple nudges blustering, blowhard cops in the right direction, demonstrating how the Queen of Crime inherited just as much from Jane Austen as Arthur Conan Doyle

Miss Marple elevates the archetype of the spinster, which has been, as Kathy Mezei writes, “a recurring icon in British literature.” This phenomenon reflects a reality of British demographics, particularly after the traumas of two world wars: women outnumbered men, and single women were seen as “lonely, superfluous, and sexually frustrated.” Mezei’s wonderful article “Spinsters, Surveillance, and Speech: The Case of Miss Marple, Miss Mole, and Miss Jekyll” from the Journal of Modern Literature lays out the way that a spinster character has been used by Christie and others to accomplish feats of narrative misdirection, and, more importantly, to “covertly query power and gender relations while simultaneously upholding the status quo.”

Joan Hickson as Miss Marple

Joan Hickson as Miss Marple

The brilliance of Christie’s deployment of Miss Marple is that she does not turn away from the spinster stereotype. We all know it: old, unmarried women are lonely, nosy, and spend their days eavesdropping and passing judgment. And it is just her apparent superfluousness, the ease with which she may observe society, unnoticed and unimportant, that perfectly situates the spinster to pick up on clues and intrigue. Miss Marple’s ambiguous position in domestic life, neither completely inside or outside the village families she observes, is where she gains her peculiar power to steer Christie’s stories: as Mezei’s mindblower of a sentence puts it, “[the spinster’s] narrative function, in representing the dialectic between seeing and being seen, omniscience and invisibility, often mirrors the ambiguous and hidden role of the author/narrator in relation to his/her characters.”

In this way, Miss Marple is never our narrator, nor does she provide the primary point of view for any of Christie’s novels. Christie’s mysteries only work in so far as they, as Mezei writes, “adroitly distort the reader’s and the characters’ angle of perception” — casting suspicion in every direction, manufacturing red herrings, following dead ends. Like all great magicians, Christie’s skill was sleight of hand, controlling her readers’ attention by flourishing the left hand while manipulating the cards with the right. Miss Marple acts as a guide in the story, or even as a fairy godmother or deus ex machina, reappearing periodically to right the investigation’s course and “readjust the focus of our gaze.”

Like all great magicians, Christie’s skill was sleight of hand, controlling her readers’ attention by flourishing the left hand while manipulating the cards with the right.

Of course, this sleight of hand has always been what Christie’s critics have complained about: that she eliminates “human interest,” as Edmund Wilson wrote in 1944, in favor of “the puzzle.” Wilson’s companion pieces “Why Do People Read Mystery Novels” and “Who Cares Who Killed Roger Ackroyd?” are masterpieces of vintage trolling, baiting readers by writing of the mystery, “As a department of imaginative writing, it looks to me completely dead,” and claiming that he grew out of detective stories by the age of twelve.

These pieces also seem to be opportunities for Wilson to covertly criticize female writers and concerns. The few writers whom he mildly praises, like Rex Stout and John Dickson Carr, are men; he criticizes Dashiell Hammett but seems to reserve the height of his asperity for the women who were at the vanguard of “the Golden Age of Detective Fiction.” He writes that Ngaio Marsh’s writing is not “prose at all except in the sense that distinguishes prose from verse;” of Christie he writes, “Her writing is of a mawkishness and banality which seem to me literally impossible to read;” of Dorothy Sayers, “She does not write very well;” of Margery Allingham, “The story and the writing both showed a surface so wooden and dead that I could not keep my mind on the page.”

The legendary crime writer Raymond Chandler wrote a response to Wilson’s first piece with his essay “The Simple Art of Murder,” effectively a defense of Hammett and a further heaping on of scorn for traditional English detective novels. He expands on Wilson’s critique of “the puzzle,” writing that the skills that contribute to artful writing and those that create a clever mystery are incompatible. “The fellow who can write you a vivid and colorful prose simply won’t be bothered with the coolie labor of breaking down unbreakable alibis,” he writes. “The master of rare knowledge is living psychologically in the age of the hoop skirt.”

But buried in these criticisms is an implicit statement about what kind of human beings make authentic characters and which reality is worthy of realism. Wilson writes that he skipped many sections of “conversations between conventional English village characters” in the books of the writers he refers to as “these ladies,” while heralding Chandler’s Farewell, My Lovely as a “novel of adventure.” Chandler says of the jaunty amateur detective in a Dorothy Sayers novel, “The English police seem to endure him with their customary stoicism; but I shudder to think of what the boys down at the Homicide Bureau in my city would do to him.” The “domestication of crime” that came with the rise of Christie and her cohort was necessarily a feminization of crime, and that emasculation is what Wilson and Chandler are writing against — Wilson goes so far as to say that Chandler is not a detective novelist at all; his writing is more allied with the spy stories of Graham Greene.

Raymond Chandler

Raymond Chandler

Chandler’s essay blames the enfeebling gentility of the detective story on the genre’s readers: he repeatedly characterizes them as “old ladies” who “like their murders scented with magnolia blossoms and do not care to be reminded that murder is an act of infinite cruelty.” In Chandler’s scheme, what Hammett and his “tough-minded” ilk brought to the detective story was a bracing, and specifically masculine, morality. “Hammett gave murder back to the kind of people that commit it for reasons,” Chandler writes, “not just to provide a corpse.” Then the only valid crime writing is tough guys writing about tough guys killing other tough guys. But one forgets, as Miss Marple says, “One does see so much evil in a village.” Or more to the point, as Miss Marple also says, “Clever young men know so little of life.”

The noir stories of Chandler and Hammett are about the malignant effects of a decaying, corrupt institution: the American city. Village mysteries are about the same, but their focus is tighter: the traditional family and its domineering patriarch. “This apparent example of English nostalgia,” Mezei writes of the Golden Age mystery, “has exposed one odd and dysfunctional household after another.” The secret subversion in this genre comes, as Mezei points out, as these mysteries explore not a threat to the status quo from the outside — chaos invading the otherwise orderly home — but from the inside. Their focus is on what is hidden, on secret identities, on the disorder and resentment that already exists within every family. Mezei quotes from Alison Light that Christie was “an iconoclast whose monitoring of the plots of family life aims to upset the Victorian image of home, sweet home.”

This “Victorian” connection is an interesting one: Miss Marple is often characterized as a Victorian because of her conservatism and her views of good and evil, but also the darkness and suspicion of her mind. “A mind like a sink, I should think,” one character says of her. “A real Victorian type.” Christie was also a real Victorian type. She was engaged by Victorian crazes like the one for travel and exotica — she was one of the first British people to surf standing up on Waikiki. Her mother believed she could talk to the dead, and when Christie famously went missing for eleven days in 1926, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle used a medium to search for her, continuing the Victorian mania for spiritualism.

Agatha Christie

Agatha Christie

Conan Doyle and Wilkie Collins were her literary heroes, as well they might be; after all, Edmund Wilson made the bold declaration that “the detective story proper had borne all its finest fruits by the end of the nineteenth century.” Collins’ The Woman in White was one of the earliest “detective novels,” and when it became the most popular book in England in 1859, reviewers leveled similar criticisms at it as Wilson did at Christie. “Our curiosity once satisfied, the charm is gone,” one reviewer wrote of the mystery in Collins’ novel. Even in the embryo days of the detective story, critics were weary of the formula, the puzzle, the sleight of hand that twists and turns our attention. But The Woman in White was a novel which innovated by borrowing from journalism, playing on the British public’s growing fascination with lurid court cases, as they devoured accounts of poisoning, bigamy, and false imprisonment. We think of the Victorian era as a time of repression and suffocating tradition, but it was also the time of a steadily germinating modernity. A population with dual preoccupations with “home, sweet home” and with salacious crime stories: who else could that beget than Agatha Christie, and all her brothers and sisters writing what we sneeringly refer to as “popular” fiction, genre fiction, airport fiction?

All our criticisms of genre fiction — that it relies too much on the sensationalism of a shocking plot; that it is unwieldy and messy; that it is too contemporary, resisting the classic’s tight-lipped timelessness; that it appeals too much to its audience’s emotions — sidestep the fact that the novel began as a popular form, one as potentially mind-rotting as TV, comic books, or Candy Crush. And it was never more so than in the Victorian era, when Charles Dickens published his own and others’ novels (including The Woman in White) in serial form, swaying with his audience’s desires. Those writers were shocking and suspenseful and sentimental and funny — they gave the people what they wanted. And if popular fiction is too formulaic, then we should tell that to Shakespeare the next time he writes about a Duke disguising himself to entrap his evil brother.

the novel began as a popular form, one as potentially mind-rotting as TV, comic books, or Candy Crush.

Shakespeare is our most enduring example of English popular fiction, and in his weaker moments he was just as messy and repetitive and the rest. Christie was a Shakespeare devotee — her only daughter was named Rosalind, after the heroine of As You Like It. In the 1950 Miss Marple novel A Murder is Announced, an unexpectedly sensitive policeman muses to himself that one of the characters would make a good Rosalind, and this sets the tone for the madcap novel, with multiple cases of mistaken identity, twins separated at birth, and even, in proper Shakespearean style, ending with a wedding.

Framing Christie’s novels as Shakespearean comedies is a fun thought experiment — I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that arguably the most popular novelist of all time (her books have sold two billion copies worldwide) is often funny. And she used comedic techniques passed down from Shakespeare and the Victorians — being too current, too meta, too cute — to sweetly barb back at her detractors. In A Murder is Announced, Miss Marple talks about reading Hammett’s stories. “I understand from my nephew Raymond that he is at the top of the tree in what is called the ‘tough’ style of literature,” she says, winkingly paraphrasing Chandler’s critique of the English mystery, of characters like herself. Miss Marple was Christie’s way of further feminizing an already feminine genre, of doubling down on her mysteries by old ladies about old ladies for old ladies.

TED WILSON REVIEWS THE WORLD: GAME OF THRONES

★★☆☆☆

Hello, and welcome to my week-by-week review of everything in the world. Today I am reviewing Game of Thrones.

You’ve probably heard of the TV show called Game of Thrones. I watched an episode the other day to see what all the fuss is about. I thought it was going to be a fun game show, like a modern twist on musical chairs. It wasn’t that at all. It’s basically like The Hobbit but with nudity. I’m glad the Hobbit didn’t have any nudity, because none of the characters were very attractive.

Game of Thrones fixes The Hobbit problem by hiring lots of attractive actresses and actors. I’ll be honest: I like seeing naked ladies, but I don’t like it when only the ladies are naked. I didn’t really see much male nudity. That seems unfair. If a wizard is uncomfortable being nude, there’s no reason they couldn’t give him a CGI penis.

In some ways the show is very accurate. For instance, a lot of the scenes are dark because they didn’t have electricity in England in the early 1800s. While it makes it hard for me to see what’s happening, I appreciate the commitment to authenticity.

However, some details, like the dragons, are completely inaccurate. Except for some religious extremists, there is not a single scientist who will say that man and dragons coexisted. Everyone knows that.

There are a lot of tough guys in this show but I didn’t recognize any of them. I’d like to see some big name, tough-guy actors like The Rock, Sean Penn, or Shia LaBeouf. And tough women, too. Katharine Hepburn was pretty tough but she’s dead. Whoever is the modern-day Katharine Hepburn. I like Amy Schumer a lot. I’d like to see her on Game of Thrones. I bet she’d ask for a CGI penis.

I have a lot of other ideas for the show, which I wrote down and mailed to George Martin, who is listed as the show’s creator. I hope he takes my ideas into consideration and implements some of them. George, if you’re reading this, I don’t need to be credited, I just want to make it a better show.

BEST FEATURE: Lots of candles everywhere. I think candles are romantic.
WORST FEATURE: The dragons don’t talk.

Please join me next week when I’ll be reviewing The Honeymooners.

Think Fast, Speak Even Faster: Mislaid by Nell Zink

by Alina Cohen

Perhaps most impressive about Nell Zink’s forthcoming Mislaid (May 19) is the author’s seemingly endless capacity for wit. When her protagonist, Peggy, gives birth to her gay husband’s son (Peggy herself is a lesbian), he proclaims that there won’t be any circumcision, believing that the practice was “dreamed up by moralists and lotion salesmen to make hand jobs chafe.” As a young man, the son asks his father, “Remember Antietam?” His father, Lee, replies, “sure, a lot of good men died,” and the son retorts, “no, I mean when I drove the car.” Zink peppers her story with clever one-liners and quick exchanges. Her characters think fast and speak even faster — about everything from circumcision to philosophy. When their marriage inevitably disintegrates, Peggy runs away from Lee and begins concealing her identity. She tells a “feminist encounter group” that her husband was an entomologist, “feeling that an intellectual in the family might make her butchering of Foucault seem less out of place.” It’s smart, sharp prose that invests the reader in the story.

The plot itself features a quirky, surprising series of comic adventures: Lee and his son, Byrdie, continue their lives in Stillwater, Virginia, where Lee is a poet and professor at an all-women’s university carrying on affairs with both men and women. Byrdie attends the University of Virginia where he’s tapped by a secret society and develops an interest in business administration, architecture, social work, and running for office. Peggy steals the identity of a black mother and daughter for herself and her daughter, Mireille. She begins hunting night crawlers and then collecting psychedelic mushrooms to support them. An alluring lesbian professor named Loredana, who goes by the name of Luke and is writing about a black lesbian playwright, comes into Peggy’s orbit.

“I didn’t want to join a fraternity anyway,” says Temple, Mereille’s boyfriend. “I was going to join a liberty first, and then an equality.” Sure, it’s a good joke, but it feels like something any of her characters, too smart for their own good, could have said. In fact, little emotion lurks beneath the surface throughout the novel. The omniscient narrator tells the reader what he or she should know, and there’s little to question. After Peggy abandons her husband and son and runs away with her daughter, the narrator states, “here a person might ask: Was Meg self-centered or what?” and answers that question explicitly: “Meg was self-centered. Early life spent fighting for chances to be herself, planning the cockeyed social suicide of manhood in the arm; weeks of unrequited lesbianism…” The narrator continues, listing all the events in the character’s life that have made her the way she is, or at least the way the narrator wants the reader to view her. There’s no subtext, no subtlety, no mystery for the reader to unpack. Thus, while the narrative touches on many loaded subjects — race, sexuality, affirmative action, welfare, drug trafficking, the feminist movement — the views come across without nuance since the injustices are blatant and occur to unreliable, underdeveloped characters.

Perhaps what’s most striking about Zink’s treatment is her insistence that her themes can be funny. She can crowd a novel full of the most contentious topics in our society and make it a pure comedy. This is a brave choice, an indication of Zink’s confidence in her own writing and humor to depict potentially troubling racial, sexual, and socioeconomic politics. Ultimately, Zink is able to pull off what Peggy, an aspiring playwright, can’t. As Peggy hones her craft, it’s “like honing a primitive tool, not a forged blade. Life with Lee had taught her to be laconic. She could quip. So her plays all ended on page two.” Zink, remarkably, turns her quips into a cohesive, full-length novel full of hijinks and clever remarks. It’s enjoyable, if not as thought provoking as it could be. There’s an unusual zest to her writing and in the zany situations she dreams up. It’s the voice of the narrator, and one might say Zink herself, that leaves the most lasting impression. And that, certainly, is admirable.

[Editor’s note: read “The Wallcreeper,” from Nell Zink’s previous novel of the same name, as recommended by Dorothy, a Publishing Project in Electric Literature’s Recommended Reading]

Mislaid

by Nell Zink

Powells.com

The Great Natural Drama, an interview with Helen Macdonald, author of H is for Hawk

We can now add Helen Macdonald’s name to England’s celebrated tradition of nature writers — except that she would probably bristle at being labeled a “nature writer.” In her new book H is for Hawk, Macdonald tells the story of the goshawk she acquires and trains to help her cope with the grief from her father’s death. It’s a hybrid of a book — a blend of nature writing and memoir, as well as a mini-biography of another hawk enthusiast, the fantasy writer T.H. White.

H is for Hawk won Britain’s Samuel Johnson Prize for nonfiction, and it’s now landed on bestseller lists in America. A dazzling writer, Macdonald has an almost incantatory power to evoke wonder. “My head jumps sideways,” she writes of the first time she sees her hawk. “She is a conjuring trick. A reptile. A fallen angel. A griffon from the pages of an illuminated bestiary.” The goshawk is a feral creature who leads Macdonald into the depths of her own inner wildness. Part of the drama of this story is to see how she pulls herself back from the brink once she’s become “more hawk than human.”

I talked with Macdonald about falconry, wildness, and the dangers of cutting yourself off from the human world. Our conversation aired on Public Radio International’s To the Best of Our Knowledge. You can subscribe to the TTBOOK podcast here.

Steve Paulson: You were very close to your father, who died suddenly from a heart attack. You say it was devastating. Did you find yourself starting to slip into some sort of madness?

Helen Macdonald: Yes, I think after big losses the world really does fracture. I was a very, very good friend of my dad. He wasn’t just a great dad, we were really partners in crime. We both shared obsessions — he loved airplanes, I loved birds and we used to wander around with binoculars looking up at the sky. And he had a massive heart attack and was suddenly gone. We didn’t even know he had any heart problems. And I just struggled to accept it.

SP: You were living alone at the time and didn’t have a regular job. Did you feel isolated?

I came back from the funeral and started to dream about goshawks.

HM: I guess if I’d had a family around me and a regular job and a house I owned and stuff like that, the structure might have kept me in place. But instead, I did something very strange. I came back from the funeral and started to dream about goshawks. Every night I’d go to sleep and wake up with the image of a goshawk flying through my dreams and slipping through the air into nowhere.

SP: You’d actually been a falconer years earlier.

HM: I’d been really obsessed with hawks. I was a very strange child! But I hadn’t flown hawks for a while and I never wanted to fly a goshawk. They’re these legendary, difficult birds — incredibly high strung and nervous, so they’re very hard to tame. And they’re renowned for their murderousness. I had never wanted anything to do with them, but suddenly they were all I could think about.

SP: So you decided to get one.

HM: I did. To deal with the grief, I decided to train a goshawk, which I don’t recommend to anyone. It’s not a particularly good way to deal with loss. But they spoke to me. And this whole decision came on a level that was really beneath conscious examination. When you lose someone very dear to you, you stop thinking logically. What drives you are very deep emotions and needs, and I just needed this goshawk. So I bought one off the Internet.

SP: You drove up to Scotland to get your young goshawk and named her Mabel. But even though you’d had all this experience training falcons when you were young, I got the sense that you didn’t really know what to do with her.

HM: I knew the steps to train a hawk; I’d done it many times before. I knew it was all done with positive reinforcement — with gifts of raw steak. I knew you had to withdraw to a darkened room for the first few days to get the hawk used to you, and then slowly get her used to other people. She jumps to your fist, then flies to it, and eventually you fly her free. I knew all those steps, but I didn’t really know who I was anymore. Now, that sounds really overblown, but I was a mess. And the more I watched the hawk to try and understand what she was feeling so I wouldn’t scare her, the more I empathized with her. Slowly, I sort of forgot who I was. The whole world shrank to just the hawk.

SP: So you cut yourself off from your friends and the human world?

HM: I did — and I think the hawk was to some extent an excuse. You do have to withdraw from the human world when you start training a hawk. So I unplugged the phone, drew the curtains, and told my friends to leave me alone. That kind of radical isolation wasn’t just about training the hawk. I just didn’t want to know about the world anymore. I didn’t like it.

SP: What was the hardest part about training your hawk?

HM: There were some surprises. I didn’t expect my hawk to be quite so friendly and lovely. In many ways, she was much more well-adjusted than I was. The most difficult thing, I guess, was just that because I was so broken at that time, I would worry an awful lot about whether I was doing things right. One of the strange things about this book is that I’ve had a lot of letters from young mums, who’ve been sitting in their houses with their very young children — obviously nothing like hawks — but they’ve said the book reminds them of what it’s like to be in a room with a very young person who can’t speak and is incredibly precious, and you just worry that you’re doing things wrong. I had this desperate sense, am I messing up this hawk, am I upsetting it?

SP: But there’s one huge difference about dealing with a hawk. Everything about a hawk is tuned to hunt and kill, and yet you were living in the middle of Cambridge. Was it hard to go back and forth between city living and this kind of wildness?

HM: I had to take the bird outside to get it used to people. If this had been the 17th century, I would have been totally unremarkable. Everyone was walking around with hawks. But I was pretty unusual, and Cambridge is a pretty eccentric place. You can wander around and speak Latin and wear clothes with holes, and that’s fine. But you try walking around with a hawk on your fist and you do get some pretty weird stares. I was trying to get the hawk used to people, but at that point I myself was pretty much as scared of people as the hawk was. So it was a very weird experience to try to get her used to the human world at the same time as me wanting to refuse that world. I pretty much wanted to stay indoors!

SP: You write that there was a period when you were becoming more hawk than human.

I became this feral creature covered in mud and blood and thorn scratches. I didn’t wash my hair. I was a mess, but it was an incredibly good way of forgetting that I was miserable.

HM: By the time I left the house with the hawk, I started to see the city through her eyes. Obviously, this is all in my imagination. Hawks have a very different sensory world than us. They see more colors and they see polarized light, so I didn’t share her literal vision. But I would come out and stare at what was going on and it would baffle me. I’d wonder what a bus was. Why is that woman throwing a ball for her dog — why would you do that? The whole city became very odd. Later, when the hawk began to fly free and hunt her own food, I really felt that I wasn’t a person anymore. I ran around after her in the bright open hillsides around Cambridge and watched this great natural drama — the hunting behavior of a wild hawk — and really completely lost touch with who I was. I became this feral creature covered in mud and blood and thorn scratches. I didn’t wash my hair. I was a mess, but it was an incredibly good way of forgetting that I was miserable.

SP: You also participated in the kill. Your hawk, Mabel, would catch a rabbit and you’d pry it out of her talons and then snap its neck to quicken the death.

HM: Yeah, it’s ironic. I’m one of the most sentimental and soft people you can imagine. I get upset when people step on spiders! But goshawks in the wild are not particularly bothered….if they catch something, they just start eating and at some point the poor thing is going to die. So I had to get in there and put the poor things out of their misery. That was a really astonishingly strong and serious moment every time. As I ran around with the hawk, I felt like an animal, almost like I could fly. But every time I had to kneel down and administer the coup de grace to some poor rabbit, I felt intensely responsible and very human. It made me realize that we don’t really see death much anymore. It all takes place behind walls, with people often in hospitals, with animals in slaughterhouses. The great irony is that I was running away from death, and yet there it was every single day. It was a deeply educational experience.

SP: Did you ever feel bad about this — not just that you were killing rabbits, but you were putting the hawk out there to kill wild creatures?

One of the things I learned is that we often use nature as a mirror of ourselves, and we use nature to justify things that humans do.

HM: That never really bothered me. That’s what birds do, that’s how they live. I don’t think you can apply human morality to birds of prey. One of the things I learned is that we often use nature as a mirror of ourselves, and we use nature to justify things that humans do. And one of the most important things to remember about birds is they’re not us! I was privileged to be part of her world at that time, but she wasn’t a person. It was very fascinating, and it taught me a lot. But I was never bloodthirsty.

SP: You’re also talking about the nature of wildness. Have you figured out what it means to be wild?

HM: Well, the weird thing about hawks is that we see them as remote symbols of wildness. Of course, Mabel was very wild, but then I’d bring her home and she’d sit on my hand and we’d watch television in the evenings and we’d play. I’d throw her scrunched up bits of paper and she’d catch them in her beak and throw them back to me. So she was a much more complicated and bewitching and strange and interesting and contradictory creature than just something that was made of wildness. I think we’ve invented this category of what wild is. We know what it is when we encounter it, but it’s complicated.

SP: Is wildness what is not human?

HM: Ultimately, yes, but in that sense, a chicken is wild. I think pretty much everything that isn’t human is a wild thing. But now when we talk about wildness, we think of mountain tops and predators. There’s a dangerous element to wildness, a sense that humans are being tested against it. That’s the kind of wildness I turned away from at the end of the book.

SP: Most of us don’t have any encounters with wildness other than fleeting glimpses. I mean, you’re not talking about a loving relationship with a dog. A goshawk is wild in some primal way and will never be domesticated.

HM: One of the great things about living with a hawk that year, apart from the emotional effects it had on me as a grieving woman, was that it was a way of encountering a wild animal in a very intimate, domestic setting. Although we went out every day and flew, there were these hours when we just hung out together. There’s not much opportunity for people to have that kind of relationship with a wild animal anymore. I fervently believe that the environment’s in big trouble and we should fight to protect all the astonishing life that’s out there. But you don’t fight to protect things unless you know and love them. I loved falconry, and this bird in particular, for showing me that these things really are astonishing.

SP: You also seem to be talking about the experience of wonder.

HM: It’s what the poet Wordsworth would have called joy — joy and wonder. That’s at the heart of what I love about the natural world. If you’re receptive to it, it does something to human minds that nothing else can do. There’s a wonderful piece of writing in one of Iris Murdoch’s philosophical books about what it’s like when you’re sitting in a room feeling cast down by life and everything seems to be crowding in on you, and you look out the window and see a kestrel hovering, and you become so tied up with that sight. I think she says, “The world becomes all kestrel, and all your fears and cares fall away in that moment of concentration.” That wonderment and joy is always there if we look for it in the natural world. It’s incredibly important to give our life space for that.

SP: Another thread to this story is your fascination with The Goshawk by T.H. White, which was published in 1951. Of course, he’s best known for his Arthurian fantasy novel The Once and Future King. Why were you so interested in White’s experience with his own goshawk?

HM: Well, I read it when I was very young and obsessed with birds of prey, and I absolutely hated it. It was about a man who was trying to train a goshawk, and he didn’t seem to know what he was doing. The bird was clearly suffering as he tried to bend it to his will. I remember flinging the book down and shouting to my poor long-suffering mother that he was doing it all wrong. I didn’t understand why a grownup would write a book like that about something he didn’t know. Many years later I realized that it was a deeply tragic, melancholy book about an attempt to fix oneself through training a hawk, which is what I wound up doing myself.

SP: You describe White as a tortured man. His parents hated each other and they didn’t seem to care about him. He was beaten as a child. He was gay at a time when you had to hide your sexual orientation. He was pretty miserable for much of his life.

HM: And the very sad thing about White is that he was incredibly successful, and yet despite his fame was clearly never happy or contented. He really was broken by his childhood experiences. His story is tangled up with mine because I wanted to try to get inside his head in the same way I tried to get inside the goshawk’s head.

SP: Why was it important to White to have this encounter with a goshawk?

So when he was fighting the hawk, he was in a weird way trying to civilize himself.

HM: He saw the goshawk as a lot of the things that he wanted to be. Being gay, being broken in many ways, having had a horrendous education, he wanted to train this hawk in an enlightened way. You can’t punish hawks, you can’t even shout at them because they don’t respond to that, and he liked that idea. He thought he could educate the hawk in the way he himself should have been educated. But he also saw the hawk as something feral — slightly gay, slightly sadistic — all the things he felt himself inside to be. So when he was fighting the hawk, he was in a weird way trying to civilize himself. It became a battle with himself in the form of a bird. And of course the bird itself came out quite badly in that battle.

SP: You seemed to read everything written by and about T.H. White. Did he end up haunting you?

HM: In a strange way, he did. I went down to the literary archive at the Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas, so I could go through all of White’s old journals and notebooks. Sometimes you look at a page and there are tear spots when he’s been crying — and you can see when he’s very drunk because his writing’s all over the place. And I’m holding and feeling these pages and outside it’s 90 degrees and there are vultures, and I’m reading about muddy winters in England, and I really did start to feel that he was somehow there.

SP: Coming back to this period when you felt you were becoming more hawk than human, how did you re-enter the human world?

HM: It got really bad. I started to do things that goshawks did. I’d either stuff my face with food and then not eat for days or I’d not eat at all. I’d literally hide behind the sofa if I saw people pass by the house. I got pretty nuts. It was at my dad’s memorial service in London when I realized I’d bought into that old chestnut that nature writing books tell you — that when you’re broken, running to the wild will heal you, it will be a place of solace and renewal. But I’d gone way too far and become seriously depressed. So I went to a local doctor and ended up going on anti-depressants, which were very helpful. I also made a big effort to see people again and negotiate that balance between wild and tame that I’d got very wrong. I managed to crawl back into the world slowly. I remember looking out the window one morning to check the weather and suddenly thinking the sky looked beautiful. At that moment, I knew that things were going to be okay.

SP: What eventually happened to your goshawk, Mabel?

HM: I flew her for many more years, in a much less feral, intense manner. We continued to watch television, and she continued to catch pheasants. But I had a life change. I couldn’t fly her every day for a while, so I lent her to someone in the north of England who was a very good falconer. Unfortunately, a couple of years ago she passed away very suddenly while she was in an aviary, from an airborne fungal infection called aspergillosis. It’s a horrible thing that attacks wild goshawks, and she just died overnight. We were all in pieces, anyone who’d known my goshawk. Mabel was a very unusual bird. I got this great email from this man saying she was the softest goshawk he’d ever known. And then he paused and put in brackets, “unless you were a rabbit.” So she’s much missed, but not by rabbits.

How Should You Order A Short Story Collection?

The first story in a short story collection should do two things:

1) Open strong to establish the writer’s authority

2) Prepare the reader for the rest of the collection

“The Sisters,” in James Joyce’s Dubliners, excels at both of these criteria. A young boy, watching from the dark street, tries to figure out whether an old priest is dead or not, based on the number of candles lit in a bedroom window. “Every night as I gazed up,” the narrator says, “I said softly to myself the word paralysis.”

As an opener, “The Sisters” does a couple of important things quickly. It establishes the narrative world as an ominous and oppressive place, and puts the narrator (and by extension the reader) in a state of overwhelmed inaction. In the spirit of T.S. Eliot’s Prufrock, we’re “like a patient etherized upon a table.” The story also introduces the stakes that will largely reign over the entire collection: the tension between the dullness of this existence and fear of any other, between staying and leaving, between sense and nonsense in life and death.

Sequencing a short story collection is pretty analogous to sequencing an album or a mix tape. The process largely depends on the balance between familiarity and change, of fulfilling the reader’s desires, while also challenging them. Flannery O’Connor’s A Good Man Is Hard To Find opens with a story about a serial killer, and transitions to a piece about a young boy’s river baptism. Miranda July’s No One Belongs Here More Than You begins with a love-fantasy on an apartment patio, followed by swim lessons in Belvedere, a middle-of-nowhere, pool-less town. Sequencing a story collection depends on mixing it up to keep things interesting, but not moving at a speed or in a manner that the reader can’t follow. This is how John Cusack’s character describes compilation-tape-making in the final scene of High Fidelity: “You gotta kick it off with a killer to grab attention. Then you gotta take it up a notch, but you don’t want to blow your wad. So, then you gotta cool it off a notch. There are a lot of rules…”

“The Lost Order,” the first story in Rivka Galchen’s 2014 collection American Innovations, shines as an opener in how effectively it establishes the collection’s narrative sensibility. The narrator in the story, after a stretch of unemployment, can’t start or finish anything, and has shifted her attention to not doing things. “I was at home, not making spaghetti,” she says. “I decided to not surf the internet. Then not to watch a television show.” A man calls with the wrong number and orders garlic chicken. He asks how long the wait will be; she gets flustered and says, “Thirty minutes?”

I had been reading most of the stories that eventually made up American Innovations as they were published, starting in 2008. Around that time, Galchen came to my college and read a frenzied, genre-bending story about time travel. I loved it. I read her first novel and I loved that, too. But when her stories appeared in The New Yorker and Harper’s, I tended to feel disappointed. I had a hard time finding their rhythm. I didn’t feel like I recognized her narrators, who behaved in ways that were at once ingratiating and infuriating.

Then the stories were released as a book and taken together, I understood them. “The Lost Order” effectively launches the sense of mental drifting that pervades over the entire collection. In one story, the narrator spends an hour and a half in a grocery store, not touching anything, pretending to be a ghost. In another, the narrator’s husband starts a blog about all the things he can’t stand about her. In the final story, the narrator’s furniture climbs out of her apartment window, away from her. The strange psychological trajectory that threads the collection together starts in that first story; the narrator hangs up the phone and obsesses over the chicken she accidentally promised to deliver. She notices it’s 11 AM and decides she better get dressed.

Scott McClanahan, a writer from West Virginia, is a contemporary master at story sequencing. McClanahan pays incredible attention to rhythm and musicality in his prose. He does the same thing in his performance: at his public readings, he whispers, shouts, and sings along to his audio tape recorder. The stories in his collections bleed and blend together. They start halfway through, and stop unexpectedly. Sometimes his stories have “second endings.” Sometimes they have the same titles, and continue where the last one left off. Especially in his most recent books — Crapalachia and Hill William — his stories crescendo, build toward twisted epiphanies, and then do it again. McClanahan’s books are fluid, brief, and conducive to a single feverish sitting.

Dorthe Nors’ Karate Chop, a recent translation from Denmark, is well-sequenced probably in large part because it emerged from the same burst of creative energy: Norse wrote the short collection in two weeks, while by herself in a cabin on the west coast of Denmark, and a hard-hitting yet tender sensibility anchors the fifteen tremendous stories. George Saunders’ books, meanwhile, are moored by his droll aw-shucksness, something that’s totally recognizable because there was a time when it was entirely unique. His books hang together, though. His whole catalog does.

Linked novels, or story cycles, seem to inherently have an easier time of story sequencing. The Things They Carried follows the same platoon of soldiers during and after Vietnam. Winesburg, Ohio, all takes place in its title town. In Olive Kittredge, Olive appears somewhere in every story. Sometimes she’s the narrator. Sometimes she’s just passing by. These books have continuity on the level of characters and place.

There are other short story collections that have an anchoring sensibility or perspective — any of Scott McClanahan’s books, for example — that might also be labeled linked novels. While a narrator is only sometimes named in Jesus’ Son, it’s presumable that all of the stories likely follow the same person, a drug addict nicknamed “Fuckhead”. In both of Junot Diaz’s collections, Drown and This Is How You Lose Her, Yunior narrates many of the stories. By strategically taking advantage of opportunities for continuity, these writers build rhythm on the level of the character, place and world-view, all of which adds up to a book that feels larger than the sum of its parts.

Collections suffer without a good strategy for organizing the content. The annual Best American Series — Best American Short Stories, Essays, Poems, etc. — for example, commits the story-sequencing sin of organizing its content by author last name. Neither the annual O. Henry Prize nor the Pushcart Prize series use this technique. Some Norton Anthologies do. When I read the annual Best American Short Stories, I always find it to be full of great stuff, but the collection struggles with rhythm. The 2014 story anthology, for example, opens with a piece by Charles Baxter that switches its narrative method and reveals a new narrator about halfway through. This might be a refreshing move once the reader has settled into the tempo of the collection, but it’s a jarring way to begin.

In the 2013 BASS, George Saunders and Jim Shepard appear immediately alongside each other, each with very long stories written in the form of diaries (“The Semplica-Girl Diaries” and “The World to Come,” respectively). If strategically distributed across the book, the stories might be able to engage in a dialogue, which could be an anthology highlight. With the stories right next to each other, the technique feels frustratingly redundant.

Book-size successes in story collections — a unified sensibility, an aesthetic wholeness, a desire in the reader to read more books by this writer — emerge from the innumerable interacting choices made in the process of writing. Story decisions are tangled together in ways that make it important for the writer to consider — when laying down a word, a scene, a story — how each piece interacts with everything that surrounds it. As Gary Lutz observes in his essay, “The Sentence Is A Lonely Place”: “words must be situated in relation to others to produce an enduring effect on a reader…there needs to be an intimacy between the words, a togetherness that has nothing to do with grammar or syntax but instead has to do with the very shapes and sounds, the forms and contours, of the gathered words.”

The same things can be said about sequencing a short story collection: each piece — linked or not — works in orchestration with the others to build a cumulative effect. Dubliners ends with Joyce’s most famous story, “The Dead.” In the final scene, Gabriel, unable to sleep, stares out his hotel window at the street. The collection begins out on the street, looking in; it ends inside, looking out. But we’re still paralyzed, still watching in fear and wonder. Joyce writes, “His soul swooned slowly as he heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.”

Some stories are openers. Some provide ballast in the middle. Different stories help writers pursue all sorts of different internal rhythms as they arise. “The Dead,” though, in all its rich and climactic melancholy, is a definitive closer.

Saeed Jones and Rob Spillman Among Winners of the 2015 PEN Literary Awards

The PEN America Center has just announced several of the winners of this year’s PEN literary awards. Among the winners are Buzzfeed Literary Editor Saeed Jones for his poetry collection Prelude to Bruise, Tin House editor Rob Spillman for editing, and author Anna Whitelock for her biography The Queen’s Bed: An Intimate History of Elizabeth’s Court.

Not all of the award winners have been announced though. Several awards, such as PEN/Robert W. Bingham Prize for Debut Fiction and PEN/Fusion Emerging Writers Prize will only be publicly announced at the June 8th ceremony. The shortlists for those awards are listed below.

Congrats to all the winners!

2015 PEN LITERARY AWARD WINNERS

PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award ($10,000): For a book of literary nonfiction on the subject of the physical or biological sciences published in 2014.

JUDGES: Sue Halpern, Marie Myung-Ok Lee, and Carl Zimmer

WINNER: War of the Whales: A True Story (Simon & Schuster), Joshua Horwitz

PEN/John Kenneth Galbraith Award for Nonfiction ($10,000): To an author of a distinguished book of general nonfiction possessing notable literary merit and critical perspective and illuminating important contemporary issues which has been published in 2013 or 2014.

JUDGES: Andrew Blechman, Paul Elie, Azadeh Moaveni, Rahna Reiko Rizzuto, and Paul Reyes

WINNER: Five Days at Memorial: Life and Death in a Storm-Ravaged Hospital (Crown), Sheri Fink

PEN/Jacqueline Bograd Weld Award for Biography ($5,000): For a distinguished biography published in 2014.

JUDGES: Emily Bernard, Nicholas Fox Weber, and Jon Meacham

WINNER: The Queen’s Bed: An Intimate History of Elizabeth’s Court (Sarah Crichton Books/ Farrar, Straus and Giroux), Anna Whitelock

PEN/Joyce Osterweil Award for Poetry ($5,000): For an emerging American poet showing promise of further literary achievement.

JUDGES: Marie Howe, Mary Szybist, and Craig Morgan Teicher

WINNER: Saeed Jones for Prelude to Bruise (Coffee House Press)

PEN/Phyllis Naylor Working Writer Fellowship ($5,000): For an author of children’s or young-adult fiction to complete a book-length work-in-progress.

JUDGES: Viola Canales, Selene Castrovilla, and Elizabeth Levy

WINNER: Stephanie Keuhn for The Pragmatist

PEN/ESPN Lifetime Achievement Award for Literary Sports Writing ($5,000): For a writer whose body of work represents an exceptional contribution to the field.

JUDGES: Mike Barnicle, Franklin Foer, and Selena Roberts

WINNER: Bob Ryan

PEN Award for Poetry in Translation ($3,000): For a book-length translation of poetry into English published in 2014.

JUDGE: Ana Božičević

WINNER: I Am the Beggar of the World (Farrar, Straus and Giroux), translated from the Pashto by Eliza Griswold

PEN Translation Prize ($3,000): For a book-length translation of prose into English published in 2014.

JUDGES: Heather Cleary, Lucas Klein, Tess Lewis, and Allison Markin Powell

WINNER: Baboon by Naja Marie Aidt (Two Lines Press), translated from the Danish by Denise Newman

PEN/Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater Awards ($7,500 and $2,500): Three awards which honor a Master American Dramatist, American Playwright in Mid-Career, and Emerging American Playwright.

JUDGES: Kathleen Chalfant, Ellen McLaughlin, and Adam Rapp

Master American Dramatist

WINNER: Tina Howe

American Playwright in Mid-Career ($7,500)

WINNER: Anne Washburn

Emerging American Playwright ($2,500)

WINNER: Jennifer Blackmer

PEN/Nora Magid Award for Editing ($2,500): For a magazine editor whose high literary taste has, throughout his or her career, contributed significantly to the excellence of the publication he or she edits.

JUDGES: Christopher Castellani, Carmela Ciuraru, and Bill Clegg

WINNER: Rob Spillman for Tin House

PEN/Ralph Manheim Medal for Translation: For a translator whose career has demonstrated a commitment to excellence through the body of his or her work.

JUDGES: Selected by the PEN Translation Committee

WINNER: Burton Watson

AWARDS TO BE ANNOUNCED

PEN/Robert W. Bingham Prize for Debut Fiction ($25,000): To an author whose debut work — a first novel or collection of short stories published in 2014 — represents distinguished literary achievement and suggests great promise.

JUDGES: Caroline Fraser, Katie Kitamura, Paul La Farge, and Victor LaValle

The winner will be announced at the 2015 PEN Literary Awards Ceremony on June 8

SHORTLIST:

The UnAmericans (W. W. Norton & Company), Molly Antopol

Ruby (Hogarth), Cynthia Bond

Redeployment (Penguin Press), Phil Klay

The Dog (Farrar, Straus and Giroux), Jack Livings

Love Me Back (Doubleday), Merritt Tierce

PEN/Diamonstein-Spielvogel Award for the Art of the Essay ($10,000): For a book of essays published in 2014 that exemplifies the dignity and esteem that the essay form imparts to literature.

JUDGES: Diane Johnson, Dahlia Lithwick, Vijay Seshadri, and Mark Slouka

The winner will be announced at the 2015 PEN Literary Awards Ceremony on June 8

SHORTLIST:

Moral Imagination (Princeton University Press), David Bromwich

Theater of Cruelty (New York Review Books), Ian Buruma

Loitering (Tin House Books), Charles D’Ambrosio

The Empathy Exams (Graywolf Press), Leslie Jamison

Limber (Sarabande Books), Angela Pelster

PEN/Fusion Emerging Writers Prize ($10,000): For a promising young writer under the age of 35 for an unpublished work of nonfiction that addresses a global and/or multicultural issue.

JUDGES: John Freeman, Roxane Gay, and Cristina Henríquez

WINNER: The winner will be announced later this month.­­­

PEN Open Book Award ($5,000): For an exceptional book-length work of literature by an author of color published in 2014.

JUDGES: R. Erica Doyle, W. Ralph Eubanks, and Chinelo Okparanta

The winner will be announced at the 2015 PEN Literary Awards Ceremony on June 8

SHORTLIST:

An Unnecessary Woman (Grove Press), Rabih Alameddine

Every Day Is for the Thief (Random House), Teju Cole

An Untamed State (Black Cat/ Grove Atlantic), Roxane Gay

Citizen (Graywolf Press), Claudia Rankine

The City Son (Soho Press), Samrat Upadhyay

PEN/Heim Translation Fund Grants ($2,000-$4,000): To support the translation of book-length works into English.

JUDGES: Esther Allen, Mitzi Angel, Peter Blackstock, Howard Goldblatt, Sara Khalili, Michael F. Moore*, Declan Spring, and Alex Zucker (*Voting Chair of the PEN/Heim Advisory Board)

WINNER: Grant recipients will be announced later this month.

Midweek Links: Literary Links from Around the Web (May 13th)

Looking for some interesting reading to get you through hump day? Here are some literary links from around the web to check out:

Speculative fiction author Alaya Dawn Johnson explains how all futures are political

A cool of gender fluid novels

Tips on inventing a language from George R. R. Martin and others

Atwood, Ballard, and other famous authors on the children’s books that got them hooked on reading

Benedict Cumberbatch reads Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis”

New novel by Patricia Park with a Korean American spin on Jane Eyre

Chipotle has a student essay contest with $20k in college fund as prize

The real world vs. the MFA: on publishing a fist novel

Finally, the strange afterlife of Poe’s hair

All Dogs Go to Heaven with a Vengeance

by Mapes Thorson, recommended by Electric Literature

Normally Darren isn’t allowed in the house, but my parents are gone for the weekend. I make sure he takes off his shoes. Where’s the bathroom, he asks. I show him where it is and he hands me the battleaxe. Wipe it down, he says. I nod and take the weapon back to the kitchen. Using a dishrag I remove all the moisture from the metal, careful to get the melted snow pooling in the recessed Celtic etchings. Darren shows up as I’m finishing and inspects my work, nodding his approval. I give him my seat and he dabs at the wet places I missed while I grab two Mountain Dews from the fridge.

It would be hard to be a sniper during a snowstorm, I say.

Not really, Darren says, and then proceeds to give me this whole spiel about next-gen scopes and how, if anything, whiteout conditions give the sniper an advantage because it makes his position harder to pinpoint.

Yeah I know all that, I say. I was joking, I say.

Yeah I know you were joking, Darren says.

The phone rings and I answer it in the other room. It’s Zulkoski, my cool friend. It’s time, he says. I hope you know what I’m talking about, he says. I don’t, but it sounds big. He asks if I can bring an extra sled and I tell him of course. When the call ends I’m so excited I dance a little. I swing an imaginary broadsword at a nearby ficus plant. I go straight to the utility room and consider my loadout; scarf or facemask, mittens or gloves. Or none of it. Don’t bundle up. Cold doesn’t affect me.

The roads in Darren’s housing development are worse than anticipated. Most have not been plowed. Some have been plowed, but not well. A few have been half-plowed to unexpected dead ends. I check the clock on the dashboard and do silent math to adjust my schedule. Darren notices and asks about my plans for the rest of the afternoon. Nothing, I say. Homework all afternoon, I say. My parents are forcing me, I say. Darren makes a jerk-off motion. He brags that his grandmother never forces him to do his homework. He tells me he’d like to see her try, then he pantomimes violent sex.

At last we arrive at our destination, a lone split-level in a cul-de-sac of two-story homes that never fails to remind me how poor Darren is compared to everyone else. The garage door is still missing from when it was stolen last month. A tarp billows in its place. There is no car in the driveway, which means Darren’s grandmother isn’t home from work yet. Darren points this out and then asks if I want to come inside and watch porn. Nope, I say. I keep the engine running. I drum my hands on the steering wheel.

Darren double-checks the zippers on his duffle bag. He fumbles with his seatbelt. He buttons his jacket. He finds his keys. He reaches into the backseat to retrieve the battleaxe and almost decapitates me lifting it forward over my headrest. Sorry, he says. Thanks for the ride, he says. I’ll have grandma drop me off at your house after dinner, he says. Then he steps out of the car.

Whoa hold on, I say. Maybe not tonight, I say. Tonight is maybe not so good, I say.

Darren freezes. He sets his duffle bag on the curb and his axe on the duffle bag. He pivots to face me. A defiant scoff hangs on his mouth. Why not, he asks. Where are you going, he asks. What are those sleds for, he asks, pointing to the sleds, thrusting his head forward to emphasize his indignation.

None of your business, I say. I need to leave right now, I say. Going sledding, I say.

Darren’s face unclenches. Shotgun, he shouts, moving as if to come with me.

I yank the car into drive and peel out.

I don’t like ditching Darren, but I don’t want to hurt his feelings. Darren is ugly. He’s a pervert. He has little eyes and his lips are scarred from a repaired cleft and his body has a weird shape like a Tyrannosaurus rex.

I stop at the end of the cul-de-sac, lean over, and pull the passenger door all the way shut. The side mirror realigns and I see Darren sprinting down the street trying to catch up. He slips on a patch of ice and eats shit in a snowbank.

Zulkoski lives in the woods and it’s hard to see his house from the road and I almost miss the turn. This is my first time here. I idle just past the mailbox and unbuckle my seatbelt and jockey my posture to get a better view. Most of the architecture is obscured by trees, but the parts that aren’t hint at a mansion beyond huge. I coax my mother’s station wagon forward up the winding driveway and park along the shoulder. I hike the rest of the way to Zulkoski’s pulling my two sleds. I pass at least twenty cars. I’m late.

I reach what I think is the front door and as I’m searching for a doorbell it opens. It’s Zulkoski’s older brother, Adam Zulkoski. He’s facing the other way saying something to a girl I can’t see but can hear laughing. Adam Zulkoski is laughing too. So I start laughing, which I hope communicates a sort of general I’m fun attitude and also hey there is someone at the front door in case you opened it by mistake or something.

Around back, Adam Zulkoski says. I do a quick lean in to see who he’s talking to, but don’t lean far enough and when I lean back Adam Zulkoski is looking at me like I’m some kind of smiling dumbfuck. Backyard, he says. Backyard, he says again.

In the backyard no one is sledding. Zulkoski is driving his father’s snowmobile in fast circles. Erin Kirchner is sitting behind him, sharing the saddle, seatbelting his stomach with her arms. Everyone else is standing around drinking Natural Ice beneath a pair of heat lamps. Zulkoski’s parents are nowhere.

I score a few acknowledging glances as I approach the crowd and dislodge a beer from the snow. Scott Schaefer shoots me an upward nod of solidarity even though I am positive Scott Schaefer doesn’t know who I am. I nod back and take a sip. The beer tastes triumphant. This is the best party I’ve ever been to.

I start walking towards Scott Schaefer’s conversation, but Zulkoski’s best friend Trent yells my name and waves me to his group instead. Trent is making a bizarre production of my arrival, checking either side of me, back and forth, with an exaggerated look of confusion on his face like maybe he thinks I’m hiding someone or something behind me. So where’s the other one, he asks.

I point back in the direction of the beer, where I left the second sled I was told to bring. Don’t worry, I say. I brought an extra, I say. That one with the stickers is mine, I say. This makes Trent lose his shit laughing. The others too. I smile and give them a lovable shrug. That’s my sled, I say.

Trent catches his breath and holds up a hand like he’s about to speak, but before he’s able to verbalize anything someone else calls my name and I turn.

It’s Zulkoski. He’s spotted me from his snowmobile and is flipping me off. Bend over, he shouts. Fuck you, I shout back, reenacting our inside joke from Earth Science last semester. Zulkoski smiles and makes a gesture like he’s eating someone out and then says something I can’t hear that makes Erin laugh. He cranes his neck and twists his head and winks at her. I brought an extra sled, I shout. Zulkoski shifts his attention back toward me. Sure, he shouts. Then he drives into a dog that he doesn’t see.

The yelp gets everyone’s attention.

Zulkoski kills the snowmobile’s engine and swivels to survey the vehicle, frantic. He doesn’t know what he hit. The animal’s hind legs are smeared along the tread, but most of the dog is caught in the undercarriage. Erin notices a piece of tail on her shoulder and screams. You hit a dog, someone shouts.

Zulkoski’s face flushes. What dog, he asks. Whose dog, he asks. What did I hit, he asks. Erin starts sobbing. Zulkoski looks like he’s about to cry too. He is taking big breaths.

The sliding door on the deck opens and we all turn toward the noise. It’s Adam Zulkoski. He walks out to the railing nearest us hefting an acoustic guitar to his shoulder like a yakuza brandishing a samurai sword. His eyes move from the chunks of dog to the snowmobile to Zulkoski. His open mouth poses a silent What The Fuck. Your brother hit a dog, someone shouts.

Adam Zulkoski tenses his grip on the neck of the guitar. Okay, he says. I’ll go get a shovel, he says. Come on Oscar, he says. A yellow lab joins him on the deck and follows him off along the side of the house. The sight of a living dog inspires me to chug the rest of my beer and open another.

Across the yard, a shaken Zulkoski dismounts the snowmobile, followed immediately by Erin, who then dashes, raw-faced, to her now also sobbing girlfriends. The rest of us move closer and form a cautious ring around the vehicle, just outside the spray of blood.

The dog’s head is half-buried upside down in the snow. Its lower jaw extends at an angle like an open stapler. Part of an ear is missing. There are bald patches in its fur. It is ugly, dirty, malnourished, an outdoor dog that has been lost or abandoned. There is no collar, but who knows; a cheap one could be shredded somewhere in the machinery. The goriest places remind me of last year’s Black Friday: Darren and I buying turkeys for cheap, lining them up in my backyard and taking the battleaxe to them.

Phil from World History moves closer, squatting near the sections of dog that are most intact. He prods the largest with his beer can. This isn’t a dog, Phil says. it’s a coyote, he says. My aunts keep coyotes on their farm, he says. You only hit a coyote, he says.

Zulkoski’s yellow lab brushes past my left leg and pads over to where Phil is crouched. It sniffs the dead animal. Phil goes to pull the dog away, but before he can it dances out of his reach and sinks its teeth into the coyote’s shoulder. It whips the carcass back and forth a few times then clenches into a tug of war with the vehicle’s undercarriage. Hey Oscar save some for the rest of us, someone shouts.

A tendon snaps and Oscar tumbles backward with most of a foreleg still in his mouth. He shakes his head and delivers the mangled limb to Phil, then he rolls over and exposes his belly.

Zulkoski laughs.

Phil laughs.

Everyone laughs, even Erin and the girls. And I’m laughing with them, but I’m also staring at the dead coyote and I’m thinking how much it looks like a dog.

Over the course of the next hour the party vibe rekindles. A few of us even suggest sledding, but nobody else seems interested. It’s getting too dark is the excuse. Trent has a brilliant idea that involves the roadside flares he keeps in his trunk. The other guests aren’t into it. Neither is Zulkoski, who has just spent the last hour cleaning coyote gore off the snowmobile with his brother. His mittens are caked with scabs of fur. Jesus Christ I am ready to get drunk, he says.

We all move to the basement and switch to liquor and decide to play charades because Zulkoski’s family has a version called Movie Charades that uses an interactive DVD. Zulkoski goes first since he’s played before. The rest of us face the other way while the television gives him his word. When the DVD announces Lights Camera Action, we all turn back.

Zulkoski is shuffling in place, hugging himself, puffing out his cheeks. Behind him, the television shows a black Cadillac rolling to a stop in front of a wheat field. A supertitle tells us it’s a scene from The Godfather. A Mediterranean variant of the Jeopardy theme plays instead of the scene’s original audio. A flashing timer counts down in the lower-right corner.

A car, someone shouts. Marlon Brando, someone shouts. The Godfather, someone shouts. Marlon Brando, someone shouts again.

Zulkoski tightens his expression and flares his eyes and shakes his head No. The Jeopardy music speeds up. The timer turns red. Clemenza leaves the car. Rocco raises his gun to shoot Paulie. The screen shakes with earthquake sound effects as the final seconds strobe away.

Cannoli, I shout.

Zulkoski exhales a burst of air and points at me. Yes, he shouts. The DVD’s narrator yells Cut and the word cannoli appears in the livery of an Italian flag.

The game awards Zulkoski 10 points for successfully acting out cannoli and awards me 15 points for guessing it. It’s my turn now. Scott Schaefer takes my Tom Collins and then he and everyone else turn their backs. The DVD gives me three different charade options: Claymore, Freedom, and Primae Noctis. The movie is Braveheart. I choose Primae Noctis because it’s worth the most points. The DVD starts a black and white countdown like an old projector. At two, the narrator calls Lights Camera Action.

I purse my lips. I frown. I point to an invisible Scottish bride. I try to look as much like nobility as possible. I scowl.

Braveheart, someone shouts.

I scowl harder. I point again to the invisible bride, this time directing her to stand in front of me. I hold out my hand and tell her to kiss it. I draw my sword to keep the groom at bay and with my free hand I bend the bride over. I start making love to her from behind, doggy-style. Every man dies but not every man truly lives, says a Scottish voice from the DVD. I continue pumping in rhythm with the bagpiped Jeopardy music until my time runs out and Primae Noctis appears in bold white letters over a flaming Union Jack. Jus primae noctis, I say, bracing to catch my breath. The right of English nobility to sleep with brides on their wedding nights, I say.

The room is silent. I feel a rush like I’ve just dropped something fragile. Zulkoski stares past me while Trent whispers something in his ear and every part of Trent’s body communicates such an intense I Told You So that I can’t help but look away. So I guess I’ll go next, says Scott Schaefer.

Some of the girls stifle laughter into their hands — not the sort of restraint meant to spare someone’s feelings; it’s the mean kind, the kind that demonstrates a shared desire to keep whatever joke hidden from me for as long as possible.

I reclaim my drink and stumble across the room to the nearest place furthest from the television, which is a papasan chair facing the sliding glass doors along the basement’s back wall.

Looking outside at my own stupid reflection, imminent thoughts of Darren put a tremble in my lower lip; I think about the childhood speech impediment that made Darren say his R’s like W’s and how all through seventh grade Bradley Neukirch would invite Darren to sit with him at lunch and trick Darren into talking, get him to embarrass himself in front of the rest of the table, get him to go on and on about elves and mutant powers and that kind of thing. I think about the four square game when Darren refused to go to the back of the line after being unfairly called Out so Bradley Neukirch started chanting Dawwen’s out, and he got everyone waiting in line to chant it, and the chant spread to the basketball courts, and it spread to the soccer field, and everyone was chanting Dawwen’s out; the teachers didn’t know what was going on, and neither did most of the students, but we all knew Darren — he said R’s like W’s and he always cried when he got mad.

A motion lamp activates somewhere along the side of the house, jerking my attention. I lean forward under the glare of the interior lights and press my face against the patio glass, straining to get an angle on whoever made the lamp turn on. My breath fogs my line of sight. I’m not seeing anybody.
I settle back into the papasan and raise my Tom Collins for another sip, but then realize my drink is just ice and Movie Charades is too loud and also people have begun guessing my name in response to whatever is being acted out behind me.

Upstairs, Phil from World History is busy arranging open beers in concentric circles on the dining room table. He looks excited when he notices me standing there. He tells me he’s rescued the fallen soldiers from this afternoon, gesturing to the thing he’s been working on. It’s all for Liquid Courage, he explains, a drinking game that he invented. We’re gonna play it later, he says. It’s kinda like strip poker, he says. It involves stripping, he says.

Your aunts have pet coyotes, I say.

Phil laughs and has me follow him into the kitchen. He opens the freezer and takes out a gallon of milk. He puts the milk in the sink to thaw. Yeah, he says. They’re lesbians, he says. My aunts are lesbians, he says. He turns toward me and holds out his hands making fists like he’s gripping the handlebars of an invisible bike. He knocks his fists together, which makes a sort-of clapping noise. Lesbians, he says again. He laughs.

The motion lights turned on but I couldn’t see who was out there, I say.

Uh oh, Phil says. He passes me the handle of whiskey.

Outside feels less cold than expected. I edge along the house’s exterior wall, hunching over, careful not to destroy footprints. The moon is worthless for tracking. It’s impossible to see any gradation in the snow. I bring my eyes within a few inches of the ground and squint to calibrate some measure of dynamic contrast range, but everything is still too flat and lights from the house are distracting my night vision — one basement window in particular, going from dark to light to dark to light.

I stoop closer to investigate.

It’s Adam Zulkoski’s bedroom. He and a topless girl are fighting over a light switch. She turns the lights off. He turns them back on. She turns them off. He turns them back on and then tries to squeeze her chest.

The topless girl shrugs out of his reach. She abandons the switch and retreats further into the room, closer to the bed, closer to the window I’m watching from. She shimmies out of her jeans, bending to help her legs free, and her tits are just hanging there, quivering, like water balloons ready to be tied.

Adam Zulkoski sidles up to assist with the remaining underwear, but the topless girl meets his advance and guides him to the mattress instead. She works his pants to his ankles all slow and smiling as if prelude to a blowjob or handjob, but then instead of removing the pants she re-fastens the belt to bind his legs. She whispers something that scandalizes Adam Zulkoski, then she punches his inner thigh and ballet twirls back to the light switch. The room goes dark. Then almost immediately the lights come back on, except now the topless girl is squinting in my direction and covering herself.

My spider-sense kicks in and gets me away from the window before she screams.

She’s reacting to the sudden movement, I tell myself. If she could see it was me, she would have screamed sooner. She’s just reacting to movement; she hasn’t seen my face, it’s too dark recognize what I’m wearing. I could be anyone out here.

A motion detector clicks somewhere close by and floodlights ignite the back patio. I adjust course and sprint for the woods. I’m deep in the trees when I hear the rattling bounce back of a door being rage opened to the limit of its hinges. How much time has passed, I try to guesstimate — enough time for pants, but maybe not gloves and a coat. Best-case scenario he’s still barefoot. I move further into the woods.

The new plan is make a wide circle back to the car, but when I reach the driveway there is no driveway. Zulkoski’s house is on my right instead of my left. The crest of the sledding hill is on my left instead of a hundred or so yards the opposite direction of where I should be. I’m all turned around. It’s dark and I’m freezing. There’s a full moon and a dog is howling. I’m halfway up a hill overlooking Zulkoski’s house. And it’s not a dog howling; it is a person howling — a person pretending to be a wolf. Darren, I say. I keep my voice quiet in case I’m wrong. Darren, I say again. I clean the tears off my cheeks. I lick the snot mustache forming on my upper lip. A swirly wind stirs up some loose powder. And then I see him.

Darren is there, twenty feet ahead in the margin of the sled path, standing just in front of the tree line. He has his battleaxe. He’s holding it high above his head like a barbarian or something, trying to look cool. He adjusts his stance and howls.

I point at Darren. I see you, I say.

Darren howls again, but this time his voice cracks and he sounds worse than a fucking retard. I see you, retard, I say, still pointing.

Darren points back at me. He gives me a thumbs down. He lowers his axe and starts spinning in circles while loosening his grip along the length of its handle like an Olympic hammer thrower but with zero athletic ability. After a dozen or so turns he lets go. The weapon silhouettes as it sails through the moonlight away from him, away from me, and up the hill to where it lands a good fifteen feet from either of us. Balls, Darren shouts, racing after the axe, trying to beat me to it, but Darren is dizzy and I’m faster. I’m faster and now Darren is lying on his back beneath me and I’m standing over him with his axe in my hands. I’m faster, I say. My heart is pumping, pounding blood, pounding in my eardrums.

I’m faster, I say again.

Darren looks up at me, smiles at me with his ugly cleft lip. He’s having trouble breathing. Not really, he says. I let you win, he says. If anything we’re equal, he says. Or I’m more like the agility specialist and you’re maybe more strength focused, he says. Plus you saw me coming, he says. You’re lucky the house was locked, he says. Next time I’ll ambush you, he says. You’ll see, he says. Next time, he says. Then he winks at me, which, when Darren does it, is more like both eyes close but one closes tighter.

Darren repositions his hands palm-down in the snow to push himself upright, but I put a foot on his chest and press him back to the ground. I tighten my hold on the haft of the axe and guide its head downward toward Darren’s left shoulder — closer and closer until the edge of its blade almost touches where his arm joins his body. I let it hover there like I’m lining up my shot.

Darren un-crosses his eyes and shifts focus to the distance exposed by the gap in my stance, as if he sees something behind me, as if oh shit there’s someone sneaking up behind me. Adam Zulkoski. I try to turn. Darren shoves my foot out from under me and I face plant instead. By the time I realize I’m down, I’m already up again, scrambling, desperate to explain myself to whoever it is Darren saw. There’s nobody.

See, Darren says. Agility, he says. Let’s mosey, he says. I’m late as fuck to this thing, he says.

Blood is smeared on my hands and I can see more blood in the snow where I fell. But I don’t feel it, whatever part of me is bleeding. I’m numb, light-headed. I make eye contact with Darren and rake my bloody fingers across my face like I’m applying war paint.

Darren gives me a look that is equal parts satisfied tormentor and excited toddler. He shows me he has the battleaxe, holds it out to me like, you want it, come get it, then he takes off running as if this was some sort of game. I stop chasing when I reach the trees and lose sight of him. I’m not giving you a ride home, I shout. This is your fault, I shout. I’m not giving you a ride home, I shout again.

Darren responds with a distant, sustained howl.

I respond to Darren’s howl with my own louder, more sustained howl.

Darren howls back, less confident than before. When he finishes, I howl again, take howling to the next level with a much louder, way more sustained howl. Darren howls back a goading, gay-sounding caricature of me howling. I interrupt him with a deafening, nearly perpetual howl, and, as soon as it’s over, I inhale and howl again, and again, chaining together howls, one after another. When I hear Darren’s howls trying to compete with mine, I howl harder, burn all remaining fuel, consume my strength, siphon my soul, howl to the point of vomiting.

A sudden, third voice rises above both of us.

I stop howling. So does Darren. It’s Adam Zulkoski, shouting like he’s trying to get someone’s attention, but I can’t see him; he must be near Darren. More shouting, and now he’s saying something. The words are too distant to hear, a pattern of incomplete sounds that resemble a single, angry question being repeated. Darren howls, but is cut off. More shouting. Screaming. Frantic apologies. More screaming. And I’m gone, running down the hill in great leaping strides.

The air in Zulkoski’s basement has that coating of morning wetness. I unravel myself from the papasan chair and try to stand without losing my balance. I’m the only person down here, unless everyone is hiding. All the couches are empty. The lights are on.

Upstairs there is still no sign of other life and too many cabinets in the kitchen so I use a dirty cup for water. There’s the residue taste of licorice, but it fades with each refill until it’s gone. I trace a dick into some spilled macaroni-and-cheese cheese powder, but otherwise just stand there drinking water until the morning sun crests the hill and enters the room. The bottles for Liquid Courage are still set up in patterns on the dining room table. The sunlight moves across them like a song in Fantasia.

At some point clouds shift. The room goes cold. I acknowledge that I’m wearing someone else’s shirt, and I’ve been cleaned. Whatever lingering desire I have to see the others awake leaves me. It’s time to go home. I finish my water and gather my coat and exit through the basement, which turns out to be a good thing because my sleds are out back and I might have forgotten them otherwise.

As I leave I pass the gore stain where the snowmobile accident occurred. I don’t have to remind myself it was just a coyote. I’m feeling zero emotional attachment to this stain right now. I squat next to it, study the grittiest splotches, locate the mixed-in animal remains and imagine undead versions of their owner.

A separate area of my brain skips back to the other day, back to before Zulkoski calls and invites me to the sledding party, back to when it’s just me and Darren taking turns chopping at saplings on my family’s acreage and I’m telling Darren how I wish the Earth was Middle-earth and how I would probably be an elf.

Darren chops a sapling and then looks at me like I’m seriously stupid. He rattles off a list of my traits. He explains how my traits are not elven traits. According to Darren, I’d be lucky to be Engwar — i.e. Man. An elf, he says. I don’t think so, he says. I’m cold let’s go inside, he says.

This is happening right as it’s my turn to chop of course, which is typical Darren autism. The gall of it, actually. I’m feeling a ton of hate in this moment, violent hate. I can’t tell if it’s real or if I’m revising the realness in hindsight or what, but the combined insult of being lectured by Darren and then losing my turn with the axe makes me so mad, so incredibly mad.

I hawk up some hangover bile and spit it on the coyote stain.

Darren is a forever-alone virgin. He doesn’t have elven traits, or life goals, or empathy. He’s a pathetic subhuman, a changeling who has sort-of learned how to mimic human form but won’t ever fully learn because of a learning disability. I gaze deep into the rust-colored snow, unblinking until the rust color distorts to a shiny purple at which point I let my eyes relax. I exhale. I tell myself pity is probably the most elven emotion, and pity is what I feel for Darren.

A gust of snow freckles the coyote stain and lifts my attention to the vast, unspoiled whiteness of the landscape beyond, where I’m about to ponder impermanence and my own mortality in the larger scheme of things, but then I see the true location of the coyote’s dismemberment is actually a dozen or so yards farther out. I’m not sure what I’ve been staring at for the past few minutes. It doesn’t matter. It’s snowing now and I don’t have the energy to walk out to the real stain of discolored snow where the snowmobile accident occurred, which from this distance looks smaller than I remember it being. I grab my leash of sleds and pull them the opposite direction, towards the front of Zulkoski’s house where all the cars from yesterday are still parked in the driveway.

BBC and Benedict Cumberbatch Bring Franz Kafka to Radio

The BBC has teamed up with nerd hero Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock, Star Trek, The Hobbit, etc.) to put Franz Kafka on radio. Cumberbatch recently read Kafka’s iconic story “The Metamorphosis,” and the audio file is free online for 29 more days!

The Kafka Cumberbatch mash-up was only one part of BBC’s “In the Shadow of Kafka,” the radio presentation of “a series of documentaries and drama examining one of the most elusive and intriguing figures in 20th century literature.”

Also notable is this radio drama production of Kafka’s great novel The Castle adapted by Ed Harris and featuring Dominic Rowan, Sammy T Dobson, Mark Benton, and more: In Franz Kafka’s mind-warping novel, set in a bureaucratic wonderland, the hapless land-surveyor known only as K answers a summons to work at the mysterious Castle, only to find himself drawn into a labyrinth of terror and absurdity. Part 1 is an hour long and available online (for 27 more days). Part 2 will go online after airing on radio.