by Natalia Borges Polesso, translated by Julia Sanches
Her hair spilled over her shoulders, and she was always in a hat and canvas shoes, which may have been why she reminded me a bit of Renato Borghetti, that folk singer with the accordion. Whenever I think of that time and of that place and try to remember people’s faces, or their voices, she’s the one I picture most clearly.
It was 1988, but thinking of it now, it seems like it could’ve been much earlier. Opposite my house stood Mr. Kuntz’s shop, with its dirt floor and exposed brick walls. That’s where I spent most afternoons, with Celoí, Mr. Kuntz’s daughter. Celoí’s mom had died in childbirth, which made them, Celoí and Mr. Kuntz, a very serious pair. I liked going there because it was right in front of my house and because Celoí had Xuxa’s latest album — the one with “Ilariê”, “Abecedário” and “Arco-íris” — and we’d dance to it in front of her dad’s store until six thirty at night, since we knew the transformer on the street always blew at seven. Seven p.m., without fail. The transformer probably couldn’t handle all the people watching telenovelas, taking showers, switching their radios on, using their blenders, and god knows what else, all at the same time, so it’d start crackling and sparking until boom! For a few hours, no one had electricity and it was like we lived in a far-flung Amazonian village. There were no sidewalks and the cobblestones in the street were totally uneven, which cost all us kids plenty of toenails since that’s where we learned to play soccer and to bike, and where we would dance to the latest hits. Not bad for a modest neighborhood on the border of Campo Bom and Novo Hamburgo.
Our house sat between two garages: the Klein family’s — a dad, a mom and their little daughter, all blond with alarmingly blue eyes, whose names I can’t really remember — and on the other side, the one run by the most striking figure of my childhood, a woman whose face I saw only once, but never forgot. Both garages had a decent enough clientele, but there was a sort of tension between the two shops that seeped through the walls of our house from both sides.
My parents were friends with the Klein family so we often had lunch together on weekends. My brother and I would play with their daughter, who was my brother’s age, I think — it’s all a bit of a blur. What’s stuck with me most from those gatherings is a phrase I once heard said: how could a machorra like that do such a thing? And curious kid that I was, I immediately asked: What’s a machorra? Total silence. Followed by my mom who started laughing really weirdly, clearly embarrassed. The men scratched their heads and stared into their beers. The Klein mom was so horrified to hear that word come out of my mouth that she started laughing, too. Mom tried to salvage the situation. Cachorra, like a dog, she said, cachorra. But I was sure I’d heard machorra, so I insisted, but they just changed the subject and ignored me. Except they weren’t expecting me to hang off their every word, to prick up my ears until they found their way back to that subject. So I stayed quiet and eavesdropped while feigning interest in a doll, my attention focused entirely on them. That’s when I understood that they were talking about our other neighbor. She was the machorra.
The next day, I was leaning over the wall, trying to catch a glimpse of her when I heard the crunching of her canvas shoes getting closer and stretched myself further over the wall… And fell. She ran over to help me and I remember hearing her voice, just like a fairy’s, asking if I was all right, if I was hurt. Mom ran out of the house, lifted me by the wrists and dragged me back to our patio. I heard a thank you from Mom and a you’re welcome from our neighbor followed by the sound of someone sucking on a cuia. I turned to Mom and asked her why our neighbor was a machorra. The slurping stopped abruptly. Mom’s face turned bright red as she dragged me into the house and asked me where I’d heard that word. Yesterday, at lunch, I said. The canvas shoes crackled over the hard earth as they rushed toward the garage. Mom leaned against the sink, both hands over her face, and sighed in a way that sounded terribly worried. I just stood there, wiping the dirt off my elbows and making sure the rest of me was fine, too; I’d fallen off a wall, after all, and my mom, strangely, seemed totally unconcerned. Honey, you can’t say those kinds of things to people. What kind of things and what kind of people was she talking about, I asked — I honestly couldn’t remember — and she answered with a pinch on the shoulder. My shoulder wasn’t hurt, but my feelings sure were, so I went to my room to cry. Between sobs, I tried to think of what a machorra could possibly be, and why it had offended our neighbor and upset mom so much. I made up my mind to ask again. It’s a sickness, honey. The neighbor’s sick. I went back to my room, nearly satisfied with her response. If it was a sickness, why hadn’t they just said so? I kept wondering whether it was contagious, but decided it couldn’t be. The garage was always busy, after all. I went back to the kitchen. Mom, what kind of sickness? My mom raised her hand to her face again and took a deep breath. It’s from the rusty metal they keep in the junk yard. I didn’t know you could get sick from metal, but felt satisfied with her response when, the next day, our teacher explained tetanus to the class.
The following morning, I did what anyone would do for a neighbor who’s sick, or at least what I thought, in my kid-brain, anyone would do: I took her flowers. I’d seen it on TV. I picked some of the flowers that grew around my house, real wildflowers, a couple of yellow ones and a bunch of daisies, then walked over to the mechanic’s — real early so no one would see me — and left the flowers at her door, in a glass of water. I also left a little note wishing she’d get well soon and asking her to please put the flowers in a vase and return the glass because my mom would probably notice it was missing. At noon, on my way home, I saw that the flowers were gone and smiled, happy she’d taken them. I walked into my house feeling cheerful, with a spring in my step, but as soon as I saw my mom’s face and the glass that had held the flowers in her hand, and her voice asking what had gotten into me, my mood was shattered. I explained to her that if the neighbor really had a case of machorra, whatever it was, someone had to go over there and wish her a speedy recovery. Which is what I did. My mom gave me a big hug and said I was such a good girl, which was why I shouldn’t play near the garage anymore. I asked which one and she said the neighbor’s. Then I asked her if I could still go play at Mr. Klein’s. Yes, she said, so I went out to see Celoí — I didn’t want to play in either shop anyway.
Celoí put Xuxa on and we danced between bags of beans and stacks of red floor wax. I remembered then that my mom was always buying that wax but our floor wasn’t red and I didn’t quite understand why, but just as I was about to ask Celoí about the wax, the neighbor walked in. I stopped dancing and stood there, petrified. My first thought was that when a person’s sick they should stay in bed, so I asked her: Are you feeling better, ma’am? She turned to me, her wet hair over her face and, with pink, pink lips and kind, honey-colored eyes, said she’d never been better. She thanked me for the flowers and kneeled to give me a kiss. Just then, my mom showed up and dragged me out by the hair. As we left, I heard Celoí’s dad saying Don’t worry about it, Flor.
Flor, her name was Flor. And she really looked like a flower, too. Actually, her whole name was Florlinda, lovely flower. I asked Celoí about it the next day, and told her about the sickness. Celoí rolled her eyes the way people do when they’re accusing someone of being naïve, said nothing, took me by the hand and into her room, then grabbed a teddy bear and two Barbies. OK, so they weren’t real Barbies, they were knock-offs, but they were affordable and they worked just fine for what she was trying to explain. I was eight years old and Celoí was eleven or twelve. She took one of the dolls and the teddy bear and began her explanation. This is a man and this is a woman, when they both love each other, they go into their bedroom and then they go like this — she put one toy on top of the other — your mom and dad do this and that’s why you exist, and why your brother does, too. I nodded, trying to follow her demonstration. Then, she took the two dolls and did the same thing and said: Some people do this instead. That’s machorra, but my dad said it isn’t nice to say that.
Mr. Kuntz was a quiet man, but he knew how to take care of people. He and Flor were friends. I’d often seen them sipping chimarrão together in her backyard or in front of his shop. I thought they were in love, so I asked Celoí about it. She slapped me and, annoyed, asked if I hadn’t understood what she’d just explained to me with the dolls. But the fact was a doll’s a doll, a bear’s a bear, and a machorra’s a machorra. Celoí tried again: OK, let’s see, What do you like more, dolls or cars? Well, it depends on the car and on the doll. Celoí rolled her eyes like she had before. What do you like more, dancing to Xuxa or playing tag? I didn’t know how to answer that, either, because everything depended, really, and I was having trouble understanding what she was getting at. OK, do you like the color pink or the color blue? I like green. For God’s sake, this is your last chance. Who do you like more, me or Claudinho? Claudinho was a boy who lived on our street; Celoí thought he was cute. You, of course, I said. Then you’re a machorra, she said, impatient.
I went home that day with my head hanging low and, as I crossed the street, ran right into Flor, who was standing between our gate and the electricity meter. Why the long face, sweetie? Because Celoí thinks I’m sick, too, that I’ve got what you have. I dragged my sneakers along the gravel. She bent over and put her hand on my forehead, as if I had the flu and she was trying to take my temperature. Don’t be silly, there’s nothing wrong with you. You’re doing just great. I looked up at her to see if she looked like she was telling me the truth. She brushed her hair away from her face and, just then, the transformer blew. The sparks lit up her eyes and, in that moment, she was the prettiest flower I’d ever seen.
Ivelisse Rodriguez conceives exquisite misery and makes alchemy of hopelessness in her debut short story collection Love War Stories(Feminist Press). In these tales, febrile adoration is returned with a slap, infidelity, and duplicity. Characters in this collection wade, and sometimes drown, in pools of delusion, eyes fixed on perceptions of idealized love. Rodriguez is adamant about drawing our attention to the ways love manifests, tenderly at first then twisting menacingly.
Each narrative in the collection is arranged against a backdrop designed with a careful and purposeful hand. It is the provincial society in the Arecibo of antiquity that heightens the protagonist’s desperation in “El Qué Dirán.” The hypermasculinity fermenting in an underprivileged inner city determines whom teenage boys are allowed to, not love, but lust in “Summer of Nene.” And in 1990s Holyoke, Massachusetts, girls armored with dark lipstick, baggy jeans and halter-tops guard against each other, yet the real enemies are their lovers.
To read these solely as tales of romance gone wrong is to miss the point completely. These are tales of mothers and daughters, initiation into womanhood, unwanted pregnancy, barren spaces where joy is suspended in air — unattainable and ephemeral. These are also tales steeped in Puerto Rican culture from the island to the mainland, from the past to the present, from the temporal to the divine.
Ivelisse and I talked about subjectivity as provenance, the malice of love, and her forthcoming novel.
Maria V. Luna: You’ve championed Latin American literature and that of the diaspora throughout your career, and now you are part of its corpus. How does that feel?
Ivelisse Rodriguez: It still feels surreal. I guess for me to feel integrated into the body of the work I would need to see it on a syllabus. My book is so new I have to wait to see if it has any impact. It’s thrilling to think I could be part of this lineage, but it ultimately depends on how the book holds up, and so we need a future life for the book.
MVL: There is a mode of literary analysis that would have us disembody art from the artist. But I don’t believe in that. I wonder if this collection comes from a place of deep subjectivity. Speaking of the work as a whole or identifying one of the short stories, can you say you have had first-hand experience with any of the themes you explore here?
IR: Absolutely. The collection does come from a place of subjectivity. A lot of it comes from my ruminations on certain situations, and the book itself does show my worldview, my thoughts on love, and my thoughts on how love can be damaging to women. It also shows my hope that women can learn other narratives — other ways of being than just being women in love. The thing with the stories though is that even if they do start from a kernel of truth, a whole story explodes from there, and by the time you see the finished story it’s so far from the original kernel. I think a story that in earlier drafts had a lot of what happened in real life is “The Light in the Sky.” But that’s part of the reason why I had trouble with the story coming together. I was relying too much on what happened. Truth gets in the way of fiction. I had to take a lot of the truth out in order for the story to stand on its own.
In the story “Some Springs Girls Do Die,”I was thinking of my friend’s suicide when I wrote the story. There may be some aspects that are true, but again I have a hard time with truth and fiction because at the end of the day, what you need to focus on, in terms of craft, is writing a compelling story. I find that the truth often gets in the way of that.
Truth gets in the way of fiction. I had to take a lot of the truth out in order for the story to stand on its own.
MVL: “Some Springs Girls Do Die” reads like a prose poem with interchanging point of views. Can you unpack the narrative and talk about the aesthetic arrangement of the piece?
IR: I think I wanted to write a prose poem when I started it, but since I don’t write poetry I ended up with a short short. The story is set up as two unnamed narrators with alternating narratives. In terms of not naming the narrators, I wanted to show how these two girls are living similar lives and are almost interchangeable or will be. In a sense, one character is near the beginning of this death process and one is at the end. Death comes in different ways. Death comes through suicide, or death comes through all the small actions we do that ultimately hurt us. Tragic things in relationships don’t start off as big things, right? They start off with small transgressions. One narrator in the story says, “If he were a different man he would use his fists instead of his words.” So right now this character is in this place where someone is being verbally abusive, and someone like that can get to a physically abusive space. The girls are similar because I wanted to show the ways girls kill themselves in relationships and things that have to do with beauty standards, etc. That’s why I set it up as a parallel story.
MVL: When I read the last line of each story in the collection, I closed the book and walked away like Dammit, she’s done it again! You are the master of crafting last lines. Is it intuition? How do you know when to stop and say there, I’ve done it?
IR: Even if you write a terrible story, a story can always be saved by its ending. It can come together. But a story can be destroyed by its ending. I’ve read stories that are chugging along, and I am enjoying them, but then they have flat endings, and I’m left like wait, there’s nothing else? To me, there has to be a sense of epiphany. I have to be moved when I get to the end. Like the ending for “The Belindas” — I’ll spend days going over the ending, and it has to sing to me. It has to touch me, and if it doesn’t touch me then it’s not the right ending. It needs to feel like something akin to a gut punch.
MVL: The end of “El Qué Dirán”made me shudder. Noelia becomes the colonizer upon her initiation into womanhood, and I was left devastated by the foreshadowing of what is to come.
You write of the goddess of love, Oshún, “If she fails herself, what about the rest of us?” Mothers, daughters, friends — the heart of no woman is spared in this collection. Though women are foregrounded, what can you say about your male characters? Are they winning the “love war”?
IR: I would say men are not winning the “love war.” It’s almost like they’re not even in the war. I don’t think the story for men is love. For them, it’s about power and getting women to do their bidding and be sexually available. For men, heterosexual men — in terms of the way they are socialized — they are not socialized to want to grow up and be married and fall in love. I think the war men are winning is having heterosexual women love them and having them do what they want them to do. I don’t think they are looking for love necessarily. I don’t know what war they are winning. They might be winning the sex war.
I don’t think the story for men is love. For them, it’s about power and getting women to do their bidding and be sexually available.
MVL: You developed really complex male characters in “Summer of Nene,” especially when it comes to their relationships. But I don’t want to give away key elements of the narrative.
So let’s talk about the Orishas. Just the other night, I was reading Tomi Adeyemi’s Children of Blood and Bone when a friend texted to announce the birth of his newborn daughter who he named Yemaya. The Orishas seem to be stepping out of the guise of what some have called syncretism. What is your relationship to the pantheon and its presentation in your work?
IR: My relationship is probably superficial, but the pantheon is alluring to me because it harkens back to an African tradition furthered by those in the Caribbean, so it seems like it’s our own thing. It’s how Xaviera feels in “La hija de Changó.”It’s a way to connect with your culture and stand apart. For Xaviera, that’s part of the reason why she wants to know what it means to be la hija de Changó — it’s a way for her to be special. It’s like connecting with a long lineage. The Orishas give you a place in history. In gay and lesbian studies, they talk about — basically, if you don’t have a history it’s difficult to situate yourself. With the pantheon, it’s like, “Look at us. We have existed for so long.”
MVL: El diamante del norte, Arecibo, features frequently in the collection. I’m feeling a bit of kinship with you since I recently found out it is my grandfather’s birthplace. Other than you being born there, what is it about this place that guides your pen back to it?
IR: In some alternate history, I wonder what my life would have been like if I had been raised in Puerto Rico. Obviously that fantasy is sometimes idealized. The idea that you’re in a place where everyone is like you and you are not a minority, that you have an extended family — that’s part of the reason. And I’m not being biased here, but I genuinely love Puerto Rico. There are places you go in this world where as soon as you land you feel like, “Umm…I don’t like it here.” Puerto Rico is one of those places that feel like home, and I feel the same way in Cuba and in Turkey.
The rewriting, or bringing the pen back to Arecibo, is a way to connect back to what could have been. That other life I could have had. There is a sense that you come to the U.S. mainland for a better life, but there are also losses. What would I have gained by being in Puerto Rico? So, I can always rewrite it, and go back with my pen. It’s a way of going home — an imaginary home.
In some alternate history, I wonder what my life would have been like if I had been raised in Puerto Rico. Obviously that fantasy is sometimes idealized.
MVL: The world of salsa music and dance comprises complex webs of hierarchy, history, gender, phenomenology — a world so often misrepresented as mere sexual artifice. Your newest project is a novel about a salsa band, yes? How did you land on this topic and what do you hope to convey about this musical art form in your work?
IR: I was attempting to do NaNoWriMo one year, and as I was free writing, Richie, my main protagonist, just came out, and then I kept pursuing his story. Richie was supposed to be a Nick Carraway-like figure, but that is not really working out at the moment.
What I want to convey about salsa is how it is this world of men, how there are so few female salsa singers. There is an emblematic photo of the Fania All-Stars, where Celia Cruz is sitting front and center, and she is surrounded by over twenty men. There is also a hyper-masculinity conveyed in salsa gorda, the dominant sub-genre of salsa during the seventies.
I am also interested in the friendships between great musicians, like Willie Colón and Héctor Lavoe or El Melao and Cortijo. And in listening to a lot of salsa music from the ‘70s, the time period of the novel, I am intrigued by the connections made to Africa in the music. For example, Ismael Miranda, when he is shouting out several Latin American countries, he includes the whole of Africa on his list. So there are numerous threads that I hope to be able to incorporate into my novel. I am enamored with salsa music and am so proud that the promulgators of this genre are Puerto Ricans.
I n the summer after high school, I road-tripped with two friends across the western United States to hunt for mountain lions. We sharpened snapped-off branches with Walmart machetes and tracked paw prints the size of our faces. We wandered deep into fir and spruce and found scat still steaming. Luckily we only found traces (pumas are masterful at avoiding people) because I imagine our confrontation playing out like hornets assaulting a ceiling fan. Why did we pursue carnivores with sticks? Because we’d grazed on Hollywood encounters with wild things, seasoned men wrestling beasts, blade in hand, rising marked. We craved talons raked against chests, body transcendence by experiencing another body, even larger, in our faces. We were lucky enough in our real lives that we could court predators for fun.
I still have this urge, to teleport beyond humanity. My skin isn’t enough, one human life inadequate. And because I’ve possessed predator ardor enough to chase a puma with a sharpened twig, I can imagine it might take to watch my three children run around terrified inside a houseful of untrained lions as I stood by and made a movie of it all.
Roar, directed by Noel Marshall and released in 1981, is widely regarded as the most dangerous film ever made. Upwards of 120 cast and crew members may have suffered injury (though the usual figure cited is 70). Most of them were mauled by a motley cast of predators left uninhibited on set.
The movie follows a wildlife biologist in Kenya, who lives in a two-story house filled with seven species of wild cats. His estranged wife and three children join him, but he arrives tardy at the airport. Missing him, the family buses to the house, and are surprised to find it packed with predators; they are terrorized until the biologist returns. The movie is bookended by Humane Society messages announcing no cats were harmed in the production. No such claim is made about the crew.
The movie is bookended by Humane Society messages announcing no cats were harmed in the production. No such claim is made about the crew.
Describing a film that teeters between terrifying and treacly, one critic summed up Roar as “Walt Disney went insane and shot a snuff version of Swiss Family Robinson.”
There are numerous on-screen depictions of maulings that shipped actors to the ER and many more that swirled behind camera. Movies like Roar not only don’t get made anymore; they are not even imagined. By now we know that a mansion or a set or a world filled with lions will forever be a household of tension.
Noel Marshall was born in the South Side of Chicago, raised in a rough-and-tumble world of Windy City gangs. As the eldest of twelve, he learned herding and protecting at a young age. Marshall later worked as Hollywood agent and producer, his fame germinating from The Exorcist, on which he was executive producer. He was impulsive, attacking each project with an atavistic, leonine ferocity.
His client, then wife, Tippi Hedren, had been a working model and single mother (of Melanie Griffith) until she starred in a diet shake commercial and attracted the appetite of Sir Alfred Joseph Hitchcock. Hedren signed a five-year contract with Hitch, during which time she made two movies, The Birds and Marnie, that in some ways would set the stage for her to risk her life with lions.
One reason for owning a tiger or bear or panther as a pet, I think, and to a lesser extent a dog, is to bring the wild into civilized lives. Many Americans still imagine nature as a wilderness stockpiled with predators in reality gunned down to almost-extinction long ago. In fact, more predators lie in human civilization: monolithic cancers, corporate poison-makers, the #metoo men in politics and Hollywood. Stocking your home with wild animals is a way of acknowledging this truth: that even supposedly civilized, domestic spaces are crawling with predators.
After a brief period of civility, Hitchcock began stalking Hedren. He drove by her house to spy from his limo and forbade male actors from touching her. On set, Hitch left baskets of bread and potatoes on Hedren’s doorstep with notes that read “eat me.” He eyeballed her even when he was mid-conversation with cameramen.
For the bedroom scene in The Birds, where Hedren’s character is ambushed by the flock, Hedren arrived for filming and found cartons of live, furious, flapping ravens, gulls, and pigeons. On Hitch’s cue, handlers pitched the squawking animals at Hedren. She fell to the floor, against the wall, and the aviary onslaught followed, pecking at her face. The birds were tied to Hedren so they wouldn’t escape. The scene filmed for five days.
Hitchcock once said, “Blondes make the best victims. They’re like virgin snow that shows up the bloody footprints.” Hedren later wrote, “Harassment and stalking were terms that didn’t exist.”
Later, on the set of Marnie, Hitchcock assaulted Hedren in her dressing room. He threatened her career, her stardom, but she fled. They never spoke again, finishing Marnie through intermediaries.
People knew what was going on, even Hitchcock’s wife, Alma. But nobody caged a monster like Hitchcock. In Hollywood beasts worse than lions roamed free.
Nobody caged a monster like Hitchcock. In Hollywood beasts worse than lions roamed free.
For Hedren, Marshall was a way to escape, which she admitted was a “really lame reason to get married.” It wasn’t love, but Marshall served as distraction from Hitch, a quasi-savior. His impulsiveness seemed frank, less calculating; he was a beast of a different order. Hedren once said, “I’d rather work with lions any day than ravens.”
After marrying, Marshall and Hedren visited the Tanzanian Serengeti. This was during the ’60s, when wild felines were being poached by the thousands for muffs and rugs. Dark reports circulated about wild cats being wiped out before the year 2000. Born Free hit theaters, its Academy Award-winning song conquering airwaves. Roar may have been released in 1981, but it is a cub of the decade dripping with a Kumbaya sense of ecological oneness. The ’60s held not an accurate depiction of wild predators but rather a sympathetic response to the misunderstandings that led to mass slaughter.
On a different safari the couple gawked at an abandoned, colonial, flat-roofed-style house flooded with the most massive pride of lions then in Africa. Big cats everywhere: filling the hallways, the balconies, the living room, sunbathing on the roof, peering from windows. Marshall and Hedren did what Hollywood types do; they said, “Let’s make a movie.”
Before even scriptwriting or story-boarding, they called their movie “Lions, Lions, and More Lions.”
Animal trainers informed Hedren and Marshall the movie industry standard required at least two adult trainers per beast, and Roar would come to have over 150 animals on set. One handler suggested raising their own big cats instead. Before 1972’s Endangered Species Act, anyone could mail order a tiger. Word got around Hollywood. Misguided predator parents, who’d witnessed the implosion of their homes, readily donated.
The first carnivores arrived in 1971 at the Hollywood couple’s Beverly Glenn home, just north of Bel Air in the mountains. The cats, many still cubs, wrestled across the boxy, post-modern house, chewing on $3,000 couches, shredding designer drapes, gnarling bedspreads for tug-of-war.
The cats’ roars caused trouble with the neighbors. At dawn, the lions spilled outside and let sail eight or nine sharp, guttural rumbles. Leonine thunder echoed across the hills. To the first neighbor who called, Hedren convinced her it was a motorcycle.
One male lion escaped through an unlocked door, and Hedren caught the cat in the middle of the street heading towards Beverly Hills. Another day, the next door neighbor looked up from gardening to see four adult lion eyes hunting her over the fence. Finally, a county animal control officer arrived and served a wildcat eviction notice.
When I find myself doubting the Marshall and Hedren’s lucidity, I recall that when I was in high school a three-year-old boy in Houston lost his arm at mid-bicep because an uncle left him alone with his pet tiger. I recall the pet chimpanzee that ate the face and hands of his owner’s friend in 2009. And the Minnesota documentarian who became lunch for her pet tiger in 2006.
I also conjure up my brother’s modest house filled with three Great Danes and a large Lab, something akin to a (tamer) lion-stuffed mansion. The Danes gnaw furniture and drywall, make thunderous growls. They have jaws that can encase my sister-in-law’s torso. They sleep, all four dogs, in bed with husband and wife.
I’ve asked my brother about this, and he says they inherited a dog, were gifted another, rescued a third and a fourth. At a certain point his house and life filled with carnivores. A lion grows from cub just as surely as a life grows from cells in utero, as bad ideas result from noble intentions. No one knew Roar was charging to final form, famous not for cinematography but for a family risking its necks to shoot a movie.
To house the big cats, Marshall and Hedren purchased a ranch north of Los Angeles, eventually owning two jaguars, two elephants, four leopards, four cranes, seven flamingos, nine black panthers, ten pumas, 26 tigers, 71 lions, and a tigon (lion-tiger hybrid). The only animal that Tippi and Noel turned down was a hippo.
The couple built a flat-roof colonial mansion. They morphed the California desert to tropical Tanzania, planting thousands of cottonwoods and Mozambique bushes. Marshall dammed a creek behind the house to create a lake. The film’s composer, Terrence Minogue, moved to the ranch and shipped in a piano to write the score with the roar of big cats around him. He would listen to yowls while he plucked at keys.
Marshall penned a script and convinced British and Japanese investors to fund the movie. Food was an immense expense. Every day predators needed 10 and 25 pounds of meat each so they wouldn’t chew the crew.
To let Hedren’s star power shine, Marshall had her act in the lead role as the mother. For the children, they hired Marshall’s sons and Hedren’s daughter, who were all actors, though Hedren’s daughter Melanie Griffith demurred at first, saying, “I don’t want to come out of this with half a face.”
For the lead, Hedren wanted Jack Nicholson, but neither he nor any actor was willing to work so close to a vortex of teeth. So Marshall cast himself as Hank the biologist and was now lead writer, director, producer, actor, and lion-tamer.
He almost died on the first day of shooting. Wanting to attract more investors with footage, Marshall stirred up a fight among the males. The quarter-ton lions scrapped and tore and circled. Toolbox mouths opened, roars built from the cauldrons of feline stomachs, creating a trail of unnerve down Tippi Hedren’s back. “The loudest, scariest, ugliest phenomena,” she wrote.
One of the arguments Roar makes is that lions are at heart peaceful and only need the right leadership to soothe them. Believing this, Marshall appointed himself alpha male and dashed in to stop the fight, charging into a whirl of claws. This clip made final cut; watching it feels like watching a man sprint into traffic to halt a pileup. Marshall was knocked into a pond and bitten through the hand, leaving a wound that resembled a volcano of flesh.
Because lion teeth are microbial test tubes, Marshall contracted blood poisoning even at the hospital and was within twelve hours of coma and death. Filming was suspended, as it would be off and on for the next five years.
The most dangerous thing you can do to a predator is take away something it’s claimed for itself. Hedren and Marshall didn’t know it yet, but the cats of Roar owned them. They had to be fed and reckoned with, or they would take what they wanted in blood. They needed constant attention and sapped Marshall and Hedren’s other projects.
It doesn’t seem like the couple predicted this. They skipping into predator rearing and lion movie shooting
I don’t think Noel and Tippi’s predator obsession, which led to their subsequent wild cat collecting, was born solely from the desire to save wild cats. The pair didn’t recognize the felines as dangerous — perhaps because, as Hedren knew well, civilized monsters wear different skins. Hedren and Marshal were so far removed from a jungle existence that the cats seemed like saviors. At the same time, there’s an uncanny unease staring at predators that situates humans within evolutionary origins on an unconscious level. Nothing grips the inner-primate mind like glancing at a creature that in another context or another second will attempt to dine on you. This blood-and-claw fear soothes people in a visceral way, one of the reasons they keep housing wild predators and making movies about them. A part of humanity, I believe, regrets what we’ve done to wild beasts and feels deeply that we should still be prey.
The pair didn’t recognize the felines as dangerous — perhaps because, as Hedren knew well, civilized monsters wear different skins.
After Marshall recovered from his attack, Hedren was scalped by a lioness who lacerated her cranium with its teeth; the sound of grating bone entering her ears from within was, she said, recorded in her memory forever. Later Hedren suffered a leg broken in the vise-clamp of an elephant trunk (also in final cut), pain knocking her unconscious. The wound gave her black gangrene.
The same lioness who attacked Hedren ripped cinematographer Jan de Bont’s scalp from neck to hairline, peeling his head like a grapefruit. De Bont’s assistant director started work that day and also quit that day. Twenty other crew members walked off set en masse.
Hedren’s daughter Melanie Griffith was attacked by a three-year-old lioness who bear-hugged her from behind, two paws on her face, one claw very near her right eye, ripping the skin back. Melanie’s fears of leaving set with half a face manifested. She would later undergo reconstructive surgery.
Marshall’s son John provoked the wrong male, who clamped its jaws around John’s head, teeth digging into his head for 25 minutes. “Every day was life or death,” John would later say.
One elephant gored another. One cheetah jumped a twelve-foot fence. Another lion escaped and was missing for three days. Hedren spent $3,000 on a helicopter and phoned in twenty friends for a search party, pinpointing the cat napping under a bridge.
Marshall allowed curious neighbors to visit, bringing children. One lioness attacked a 9-year-old boy moments after he ogled her powerful legs and steely eyes. Hedren’s book The Cats of Shambala includes a black-and-white photo of this same lion charging the viewfinder. My nerves give way just looking at the picture. This lion stalked that boy with the same laser gaze she gives the camera, cantaloupe-sized paws stirring dust, ears flattened to streamline her body.
I have a child now, and this image brews within me an atavistic sense of dread. Not for what the cat is, but for that blinding swiftness and capability left to roam free around a buffet of people. Hedren and Marshall doted on their predators, even loved them, and wanted to halt mass slaughter. But I don’t think they respected the unknowability inherent in a species that doesn’t speak our languages.
The only cast member to survive Roar without a hospital vacation was Kyalo Mativo, a bald, wiry Santa Monica resident. As a native Kenyan, Mativo had acted in two German films and would later star in the dinosaur flick Baby: Secret of the Lost Legend. In Roar, Mativo plays a friend who helps Hank sweep house and journey to the airport. Crew members, in interviews, remark about Mativo’s bravery because unlike Marshall, Mativo understood his peril.
Mativo would disappear from the production when his scenes weren’t filming to get away from the cats. “Where I come from,” Mativo said in an interview, “we don’t come close to animals to cuddle them, to kiss them, to go to bed with them.” In a scene when Mativo (whose character bore the same name) is surrounded by lions in the house, he asks Hank, “What do you think you’re doing, running a country club for lions?”
On-screen, Mativo is a target of Hank’s colonialist white-splaining. Hank grabs Mativo by the shoulder leading him around the compound, pointing out lions, and how they can act with guidance. “It’s just like life,” Hank says to Mativo, as a group of males squirms past him, “you get the gentle and the ferocious.”
At one point in the movie, reality arrives. Hank is murmuring to Mativo, “Cats got a little excited, that’s all — ” but doesn’t finish because he’s kneecapped by a charging lion. Five female lions then pounce on him. They bowl Marshall over, pawing at his face, clapping Marshall’s head in jaws. Mativo cries, “Are you okay? Crazy!” and then steps away. The cats do look like they’re playing, but the line between play and violence is as thin as a claw mark.
In another scene, Hank and Mativo are bicycling with tigers who won’t leave them alone. Mativo crashes his bike, and the two tigers attack. To escape, Mativo ascends a tree and says to Hank that he’s not leaving. Hank asks Mativo to dangle his shirt like a lure so Hank can sneak away.
Hank pedals towards the airport while Mativo fishes for tigers. From an overhead angle, this shot appears horrifying. A storm of claws and growls swirls around human arms and legs. In the film, Mativo stays in the tree until morning. To me, this is an entire movie in itself, an Open Water or The Edge, but in Roar it is a briefly-noted point of humor. After the camera cuts from Mativo, we see Hank biking into the sunset singing a tune. Mativo’s predicament is an afterthought compared to Marshall’s chirping.
Marshall was as condescending to Mativo as he was to the lions, refusing to consider who they were outside of a dreamscape. Fantasy is Hollywood’s breakfast staple, what peers out between the dark edges of a sleep-like movie theater. Roar is that unique moment when reality intrudes, critiquing dreams.
It’s not wrong, I think, that Tippi and Noel cared about lions; I too adore predators. But I respect them, or try to, and know that the only way we can ever cohabitate is to have separate cells in this prison of human-dominated earth. Marshall, especially, seemed oblivious to this, and his ignorance stands out most when he is monologuing to a native Kenyan about lions.
In Roar’s finished product there is spectacle unlike any film created. I feel palpable terror watching Tippi, Melanie, John, and Jerry flee from the big cats in the mansion, knowing the cast is in actual mortal danger. There is no CGI, no stunts. Pulse-pounding drums and percussion follow Hank’s family as they arrive at the ranch without him and dodge and hide in a house filled with monsters.
The family flees and turns corners while dozens of carnivores chase. The scene rolls like footage from a haunted mansion, harassed innocents thwarting death. The family hides, squirreling away in overturned lockers, wardrobes, barrels. They bolt along the balconies, swim in the pond, ascend ladders, forever running, running, running, which of course is precisely what you shouldn’t do with lions.
In one scene, Melanie falls to the kitchen floor, a lioness burrito-wrapped around her, pawing at thighs, chewing scalp. Hedren, her real-life mother, pulls the lioness away by the shoulders and tail and cries for help with tears in her eyes and a genuine shake in her throat. She glances off camera when she cries, “Please, somebody help!” Melanie utters the safe word “Noel,” but perhaps because it resembled “No” or perhaps because the scene was too good, Marshall let film roll.
When Roar was 80 percent complete a dam upstream from the filming collapsed. A ten-foot-high wall of water hit the compound, dumping thousands of tons of effluent. The house’s first floor filled with mud. The water carried away hundreds of planted trees, along with the production’s editing bay.
Fences and cages collapsed, many of the cats escaping. One was Robbie, the “star” of the film, the gentle giant. Robbie was shot and killed by a Sheriff’s Department Deputy when he growled.
It took the Marshall eight months to rebuild. They bought seven hundred trees to replace those lost. Hedren sold her jewels and a fur coat gifted to her by Hitchcock. It was ironic that a fur coat kept afloat a project bent on undermining the animal trade, doubly ironic that a gift from one predator would be used to feed 150 more.
It was ironic that a gift from one predator would be used to feed 150 more.
As soon as the set was rebuilt and the countryside dried up, a blaze 250 miles long circled the ranch. The lions were blanketed in smoke and ash. Luckily the set and animals were spared from the fire.
The flood and fire and cat bites and hospital visits have all led at least one critic to call Roar “the most plague-riddled production in Hollywood history.”
The aim of shepherding Roar to completion was like seeing a child off to college. After, for Hedren and Marshall, there were only “bitter arguments, recriminations, and tense, hollow silence,” as Hedren wrote. By 1978, Marshall and Hedren weren’t giving each other Christmas gifts.
Roar cost Hedren and Marshall and their investors $17 million, $80 million in today’s inflation. Because Marshall couldn’t barter with American studios, Roar was only released abroad and made less than $2 million. It was a critical nightmare: voice-overs as bad as any Showa Godzilla film, whiplash-inducing jump cuts, corny dialogue (“Oh, God, look what the cat dragged in!”). It’s not even clear what science Hank is practicing, and the family does not become individuals before they are confused and menaced by a house full of predators.
Marshall and Hedren imagined they knew their role in the lion movie, figured on raising and feeding predators and living alongside them in peace. They may not have used fences, but the producer couple built mental walls, blocking off possibilities: the possibility of the cats attacking the crew; the possibility of losing Robbie, the benevolent patriarch. The cats ignored their boundaries as wild animals will always do.
A male lion is only dominant until he’s pawed aside. Lions move and maneuver and follow the herd. They sometimes attack people. A pride may appear simple and languid from the view of a safari Range Rover but within is a universe that makes sense only to the felines. And humans change too, can grow, can redraw the fantasies that put us to sleep.
In 2015, Drafthouse Films, distribution arm of Alamo Drafthouse, bought Roar’s screening rights. Roar landed in American theaters 25 years after its completion. The film was reborn into a world that would shortly be more concerned with other types of Hollywood predators. Hoarding big cats, living among them without acknowledging their danger, seemed so naive as to be an oddity, the stuff of second-run art film houses. A year later it would be clear that everyone in the movie industry had been doing that all along.
After their divorce Marshall went back to making commercials, and Hedren resided with the animals at the ranch, renaming it Shambala. Hedren founded The Roar Foundation in 1983, a nonprofit providing sanctuary to exotic felines. The purpose of Shambala is so the big cats can “live out their lives in dignity,” according to its website. Over the years, Shambala has rescued hundreds of cats, many abused, from wayward predator enthusiasts, wildcat peddlers, roadside zoos.
Recalling her experiences on Roar, Hedren turned against owning carnivores. She co-authored a bill curtailing the wildcat trade and carried it to her California congressman, who, in a rare celebration of democracy, helped the Captive Wildlife Safety Act become law in 2003.
Marshall died in 2010 from brain cancer. “Seventeen years of nonstop impulsive chaos at a dead run,” Hedren once described their frenzy.
These days, Hedren, now 88, can be found wandering around Shambala, separated from the big cats by fences. She hosts fundraisers and spends every day walking the footpaths and bridges, spying on hunters. “They’re each so different,” she writes, “each with their own distinct personalities and sounds, as individual as people.” Some of the cats come to the chainlink to lick her hello.
Elsewhere at Shambala, lions head-butt and groom each other. They eat red meat from white buckets. Dawn is the cats’ favorite time as a cool mist wafts over the river where frogs trumpet. Desert orange crests over the chaparral mountains, and Hedren pulls the blinds open to watch. At sunrise, the cats roar, many of them less than twenty feet away from Hedren’s bed. Every morning she awakens to this chorus. The lions call to their littermates, setting each other off, sometimes 20 of them. The house earthquakes. The floors thrum.
There are other residents, a swirl of inky, dive-bombing birds who nip at fingers and send reminders scurrying through toes and echo the past. Shambala sports an eerie and sometimes greedy population of ravens.
They dine on the big cats’ leftovers. But sometimes the ravens get too close, and the lions and tigers swipe at them for sport, bringing one down in a satisfying display of feather confetti. The animals keep each other in check.
I grew up reading ghost stories — M.R. James, Edgar Allan Poe — and loved watching the ghost story dramas that were on television every Christmas. I’ve always enjoyed being frightened, to feel that surge of adrenaline when I’m doing no more than curling up on my sofa or in my bed. It’s a natural high without any serious consequences.
Buy the book
Haunted house stories bring that feeling of uncertainty or terror home. If you’re indoors when you’re reading a novel with a haunted house at its center, the room you’re in, its uncurtained windows and dark corners, will still be there when you put the book down, and so the thrill continues. And your own house doesn’t have to be a gothic mansion with turrets and secret staircases to be scary. Ordinary houses and apartments all have their own peculiarities that can unsettle. Are those noises water gurgling in the pipes or something else? Did the kitchen door creep open because it’s badly hung, or is something standing on the other side? The fun of reading novels with haunted houses is turning off your thinking brain and seeing how you react.
In Bitter Orange, my third novel, I play with the tropes of haunted houses: the grand dilapidated mansion, the bird found dead in a room, the white face at the window. It’s not only a haunted-house novel; Bitter Orange touches on the ghostly because the setting and the characters’ states of mind seemed to ask for it. Here are seven great haunted house novels that have me glancing over my shoulder:
This book is for anyone who has sat in a lighted room at night with a large glass window in front of them and worried about what’s out there beyond their reflection. Except that Kehlmann cleverly plays with that dread by altering the reflection so the terror becomes what is or in fact isn’t in the room. The narrator in this brief novel is staying with his wife and daughter in the antithesis of the haunted gothic mansion: a modern glass box rented from Airbnb, in the Alps. Written as a journal, the book includes the screenplay the narrator is attempting (pretending) to write, interspersed with notes on the state of his marriage. But as he looks back over what he’s written he sees entries he doesn’t remember making. The book plays with time-travel as well as hauntings, and even throws in a bit of geometry.
I couldn’t write a list of haunted-house novels without including this perfect example. Jackson sets the horror up from the first paragraph, saying of the house, “whatever walked there walked alone.” A paranormal researcher gathers three other people together, including lonely spinster Eleanor, to investigate Hill House in New England, a labyrinthine property of odd angles and dark corners. It’s clear by the end of the novel that the house has a malignant agency; it’s not haunted so much as it’s evil personified, which Eleanor becomes fixated on and changed by.
The McCray and Savage families decamp to their two Victorian summer houses at Beldame on a spit of land along the Alabama Gulf Coast, taking with them thirteen-year-old India who is visiting for the first time. But there is a third house in between the two, one that has been empty for years and is slowly being consumed by sand. No family member will step inside it except the spirited India. The location — all heat, light, and encroaching sand — is unlike the usual haunted-house trope of dank darkness, which makes it all the more vivid. The Elementals that inhabit the third house are slippery things, not quite ghosts, but some sort of malevolent shape-shifters that truly terrify.
In 1947 Dr. Faraday is called out to Hundreds Hall, a dilapidated English country house that he first visited when he was ten and his mother was a maid for the family: “I remember its lovely ageing details: the worn red brick, the cockled window glass, the weathered sandstone edgings. They made it look blurred and slightly uncertain — like an ice, I thought, just beginning to melt in the sun.” From that clever description, Waters hints that this story will be ambiguous and subtle. Faraday becomes entwined with the Ayres family as odd events occur in the house. This is an historical novel with wonderful period detail, and by the end you could say that it’s not the house that is haunted, but the people in it.
There aren’t any witches in White is for Witching, but there is a house in Dover, England that could be said to be alive. The story — which is slight — is told by four voices, one of which is the house itself. The main narrator is Miranda Silver, who has pica, an eating disorder which compels her eat things which aren’t food, including chalk and plastic. Four generations of dead Silver women exist within the walls of the house and it seems the building has no intention of letting Miranda go either. The writing style is fairytale-esque, and structure is unusual, with the points of view often swapping unexpectedly. There is a feeling of unsettling and confusing dark magic, and it’s the kind of book you have to sink into and not struggle against to discover its full enjoyment.
Mary and Graham Coles move to a rural cottage in Suffolk, England, one that is “dark and unsteady, turned in on itself.” They have suffered a terrible tragedy and are trying to make a new life for themselves in the country, but Mary catches fleeting glimpses of children in the house and hears their voices outside, as well as seeing a red-headed man. As this narrative develops we are switched into one taking place a hundred years previously. Here, a red-headed stranger is caught under a falling tree and taken in by the family who live in the same cottage as the Coles do now. We hear from a character who is “haunted” by a ghost from the future: “Merricoles.” The two timelines are intricately woven, and the whole story carries a wonderful undercurrent of menace.
This haunted house novel ticks a lot of boxes for familiar (and reassuring) tropes: rambling and isolated country house, weird current inhabitants, and a happy family that gets “stuck” there. Marian and Ben, together with their son David and aunt Elizabeth, rent a Long Island mansion from the Allardyce siblings one summer. But it’s so cheap, is it too good to be true? Marian becomes obsessed with the house and its contents, as well as an upstairs sitting-room beyond which lives old Mrs. Allardyce. Marian must provide meals for her three times a day, and yet never sees her. You do have to roll with the 1970’s dialogue and occasional sexism, but if you’re looking for a house that turns people mad, this is a classic.
When the sun is two trees up, the learners call Clyde to the room for work. Clyde leaves the people and enters the room with the machine. Clyde is one of the people who works. He is good. In the room with the machine, there is the machine, the glass, the door, and the window with shelf. Learners stand behind the glass with another machine. Door opens so learners can come inside the room for play. Window opens to let the people watch outside.
Clyde works with Peter. Peter is a learner. Clyde loves Peter. Peter has grey hair on his face and his laugh feels like sun-warmed dirt.
Today, Peter is not seen. Instead, it is Marta. Clyde does not like Marta. Marta does not listen. More and more Marta with Peter. Marta tends to Peter like he has hurt. Clyde has groomed Peter and there are no wounds, so Clyde does not understand. Peter asks CLYDE TALK TO MARTA but Clyde says NO. More and more Peter goes. Leaves Clyde with only Marta.
Marta is bad. Marta makes Clyde use machine sentences. Marta wants WHAT NAME OF THIS WHICH IS RED? And PLEASE GIVE CLYDE M&M. She says NO when Clyde tells her something true. Something like TICKLE SKY WATER GREEN BLUE RED BLUE BLACK HAPPY NANA NANA. Which is machine talk and too small. Clyde means: when it storms, Nana holds within her all the colors of the earth and makes the people forget their fear. Clyde tries teach Marta. Marta not listen.
Peter listens.
Clyde knows the learners’ words are too small. They need the Machine. They can’t see things the people do. Clyde feels sad for the learners. But this is why the people work. They teach. They help.
But Marta won’t learn. Today, Marta is behind the glass and Clyde wants Marta to listen more and more and the want fills his legs until he must kick. Feet to glass. Bam! Get it out.
Marta flinches. Clyde leans, shoulder against glass. He sees past Marta to find Peter hiding. But no Peter. Marta stands different. Marta’s arms hang sad. He cannot let her know he has seen so he turns to the machine instead of seeing closer to learn.
Clyde pulls the lever. Machine wakes up. Machine words light. Machine says “Hi Clyde,” with its voice.
Clyde gives the machine the bird. Peter taught Clyde the bird. Clyde gives the machine the bird whenever the machine says, “Hi Clyde.”
Before Clyde can use machine, Marta types, PETER NO MORE.
Clyde ignores this. It is nothing talk.
PLEASE MACHINE OPEN WINDOW, Clyde presses. Maybe Peter hides outside. Maybe Peter will scare Clyde in a fun way. Clyde’s hair tingles with possibility.
The shade on the window ups slowly. Clyde ups onto the shelf to see. He thwomps the window with his hands. Moves on one foot, then other. Finally, he sees outside. In that which is blue, birds weave grace without jumping from platforms or swinging from ropes. Plants on the ground, color of which is yellow, dance. Clyde likes the dancing grass. Its ends tickle his face and lips. Clyde talks about the grass with his voice. The other people respond. Nana loudest. They agree. Many are excited to be with the grass today.
But no Peter. Clyde sees to the glass. Marta is still there. She makes words with her hands but Clyde pretends not to see. If Clyde uses the machine, Marta uses the machine.
Clyde downs from the shelf, goes to the machine. He sees through the glass again. He sees through Marta. No Peter.
QUESTION WANT PETER, Clyde types.
NO PETER, Marta responds.
Clyde scans the symbols. Marta understands very few things. He must talk careful.
PLEASE OPEN DOOR PETER TICKLE CLYDE.
Marta shakes behind glass and Clyde sees. Marta plays hide. Bad hiding, like a baby. Hands over face.
Clyde thinks, talks. MARTA HIDE QUESTION. He sees. Marta does not answer or stop hiding. Marta’s game is not fun. Maybe Marta has hurt.
Clyde slides to the glass where he and Peter tickle with air. He presses his face against its coolness. One curved hand over his head to stop the false Clyde in the glass from appearing. He sees. Nothing. He bams the glass. Then waits. Waits for Marta move her hands. Clyde’s lips purse out. Question.
WHAT NAME MARTA EYES WHICH ARE RED.
Marta answers, SAD.
Clyde traces his finger over the symbol.
SAD QUESTION.
Marta shakes again. Clyde is sad for Marta now. Marta wants to say more and more but her words are too small. The machine talk touches few truths.
QUESTION MARTA WANT PETER.
YES, she says. CLYDE WANT PETER.
Clyde responds with his mouth. The people agree.
NO PETER, she says.
Clyde wants to talk about this with his mouth because she is right. Maybe she is learning good, but a feeling in his middle makes Clyde quiet. His arms turn heavy and slow. Clyde does not like that Marta wants Peter but Marta cannot have Peter.
QUESTION PETER QUIET GO HIDE SLEEP HIDE GO. He wants to know if Peter has gone beyond words and the ability to be seen except in the place of dreams. This is not a machine sentence, but Marta answers.
NO MORE PETER.
Clyde sees at feet. He wants Nana and the people and grooming. The hollow in his middle is bad. But the people’s voices are outside and Clyde is in the room.
QUESTION.
Clyde sees only at the machine. Not Marta.
QUESTION PLEASE MARTA OPEN DOOR HUG CLYDE.
Marta never enters the door. But it opens. Marta enters. She waits. Clyde takes Marta’s hand. It’s soft. He brings her into the room. Clyde wraps his arms around Marta. They rock. Marta’s eyes make more sad. The sad touches the hollow in Clyde’s middle. They stay in hug, and say nothing.
No machine between them to keep them from understanding one another.
About the Author
Dan Musgrave was raised by animals in rural Kansas. Currently, he is one of the Tulsa Artist Fellowship’s initial cohort of Literary Fellows. His work has appeared in The Missouri Review and The Sun. For nearly seven years, he did linguistic, cognitive, and behavioral research with captive bonobos while they trained him in the art of being a better person. Find him online at danmusgrave.com.
Black women novelists have won the Nobel Prize (Toni Morrison), garnered the Pulitzer Prize (Alice Walker), and conquered the New York Times bestseller list (Tayari Jones) but black women short story writers aren’t always as visible. When readers think of masters of the short form, they most likely draw from a canon of writers who are white and those who are male. 19th-century African-American writers were masters of nonfiction in the form of slave narratives and persuasive essays arguing for the liberation of their community but they were also capturing the dailiness of black life in short fiction.
Purchase the book
Through the Harlem Renaissance and the Black Arts Movement to the contemporary landscape, black writers have shaped their sentences to detail the impactful moments of their characters’ lives. I wanted the stories in my collection, Training School for Negro Girls to highlight the effects of racism, sexism, and classism on black girls and women and those stories now join a legacy of black women writers who wanted to see themselves on the pages of journals and on the covers of books.
You might know Roxane Gay’s short story collections or regularly return to the work of ZZ Packer, but below are seven other black and female short story writers you should be reading. The novel might be the more lauded form but in the hands of these women, the short story more than holds its own, brief but spectacular.
Ann Petry is probably best known for her debut novel The Street, which expertly detailed the struggles of Harlemites Ludie Johnson and her son, Bub, and went on to sell more than a million and a half copies. Petry’s discerning eye for the weight of the quotidian on her characters is just as evident in her short stories. Originally published in 1971 from stories written from the 1940s to the 1960s, her collection, Miss Muriel and Other Stories, was reissued last year. Themes of the black community’s relationship with the police and the inescapable realities of structural inequality are prominent in Petry’s work, meaning her stories are as relevant now as they were then.
When Toni Morrison and Alice Walker broke through to the mainstream literary scene in the early 1970s, Toni Cade Bambara was right there with them. Her essential anthology, The Black Woman, highlighted the work of black women writers across genre. She was also writing some of the best short stories to come out of the Black Arts Movement. Her 1972 collection, Gorilla, My Love, includes her much-anthologized story, “The Lesson”, about a group of black kids taught a painful lesson about class and race in one afternoon. Bambara was unabashedly radical and feminist and her work shows it. In the decades to come, Bambara would also become a master of the novel with The Salt Eaters and Those Bones Are Not My Child but if you want to witness her sharp, unflinching eye in its purest form, read her short stories.
The personal history of Gayl Jones is as complex as her fictional work, intertwined thematically by black male and female relationships, trauma, and historical legacy. Read about her personal life if you choose but don’t neglect to get familiar with the brilliance of her fiction. Her novels, Eva’s Man and Corregidora, were hailed by Maya Angelou and James Baldwin and her short fiction is as dynamic when it comes to form and voice. Jones painstakingly renders the rhythms of black speech and was ahead of her time in representing the spectrum of sexual identity and giving voice to those who are mentally ill. Try “The Women” or “Asylum” from her collection White Rat and see if Jones’s work doesn’t stay with you long after you’ve left the page.
Rest assured: black women writers aren’t only writing realist fiction. Octavia Butler and Nnedi Okorafor both have bodies of work that include short stories in addition to the speculative worlds of their novels. Likewise, Nalo Hopkinson builds worlds on the large scale of the novel and on the small scale in her short story collections Skin Folk, Report From Planet Midnight, and her 2015 collection Falling in Love With Hominids. Hopkinson remixes canonical texts, from fairy tales to Shakespeare, and infuses them with an Afro-Caribbean perspective. Adults become monstrous consumers of flesh and a free society of former slaves is infused with magical realism. Samuel Delany once noted that science fiction is particularly important “for those who are oppressed, because if they’re going to change the world we live in, they — and all of us — have to be able to think about a world that works differently.” Hopkinson is doing just that.
Stories about the black experience are often focused on east coast urban centers or the South but Dana Johnson’s work explores the African-American experience on the west coast, specifically Southern California. In her first collection, Break Any Woman Down, and In the Not Quite Dark, her 2016 collection, Johnson sets her characters on seemingly innocuous paths until the import of the friend they’re with or the destination they’ve reached lands its full literary impact. Socio-economic class and the imprecise discomfort of being the only black person in a predominantly white space often recur in her work, all under the glare of the California sun.
The most prolific short story writer on the list, Gautier has written three collections so far, Now We Will Be Happy, At-risk, and The Loss of All Lost Things. For her mastery of the genre, Gautier has been honored with the PEN/Malamud and Flannery O’Connor awards and it’s easy to see why from her stories. Black and Puerto Rican, Gautier makes literary art of both tostones, Puerto Rican fried plantains that become an entry point for a character’s narration, and the oceans of loss many of her characters experience. Couples have children go missing, lovers break up, and characters are forced to re-imagine themselves in a new place under the watchful eye of Gautier’s prose.
Want to see where the short story genre is headed? Look no further than Heads of the Colored People by Nafissa Thompson-Spires. Recently long-listed for the National Book Award, Thompson-Spires suffuses her stories with humor and the surrealism of the digital age. The title reaches back to the 19th century but the plot turns and character descriptions teeter between now and next. Intersectional is an understatement in Thompson-Spires’s hands where class and race and disability all gather in the pages of the collection.
The National Institute of Mental Health reports that nearly one in five adults in the United States lives with mental illness. The stigma surrounding mental illness is shifting, but that doesn’t mean it is any easier to write about. The challenge of writing about mental illness is to describe the indescribable, to make the concept of pain real for an audience not experiencing it, and to render pain simultaneously mental and physical, spiritual and cultural.
Buy the book
In my book Quite Mad: An American Pharma Memoir, I write about my experiences with severe anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, mental illnesses which often present as unreal to those who have not experienced them. To make these real for readers, I situate my story within the stories of others, weaving memoir with cultural criticism and positioning my complex history of treatment within the context of the United States’ treatment of the mentally ill — a cruel, coercive history fraught with issues of power, particularly for women, who are diagnosed at higher rates, yet less likely to have their pain believed.
Recent literature written about mental illness makes the seemingly unreal experiences of madness vivid and tangible. Here are seven new books that capture the complexities and nuance of mental illness:
McKibbens’ blud casts an insistent urgency over conversations surrounding trauma, survival, and violence to the female body with dark poems that take readers close to the heart of depression. McKibben’s speaker describes the inherited consequences of sexual abuse and physical violence, along with those of genetics. blud is unflinching in its examination of pain and legacy, a rhythmic collection that pulses with the desire to speak what is so frequently silenced. “We, the most feral singers,” McKibben fearlessly claims in the acknowledgements, “We who open our throats to swallow the sky’s shimmering and perfect darkness, we are so goddam holy.” While McKibbens’ poems detail the human hurts many would rather unsee, they are reckonings, stunning spells for those living with mental illness.
Lee’s debut novel, shares the story of two Chinese American sisters and the impacts that immigration, motherhood, and mental health have on their relationships. Told in alternating points of view, the novel follows pragmatic older sister Miranda as she chooses a conventional path of responsibility, while younger sister Lucia embraces a life of impulsivity, her magnetism shifting to madness. Concealing her schizoaffective disorder, Lucia abruptly leaves her Russian-Israeli Jewish first husband to have a child with an Ecuadorian immigrant, moving in and out of homes, hospitals, and various countries. Conflict over her treatment drives much of the tension. “It was not my story to tell,” Miranda begins the novel and her lifelong sense of duty, one she believes requires her to force her sister to seek treatment. Lucia’s point of view is insightful and intelligent, she is keenly aware of her illness and how it affects others. “I didn’t tell anyone,” she admits, “First, it was a secret. Second, I was ashamed. Third, I couldn’t stand to hear the human population’s efforts to convince me it wasn’t true.” The story is one of blurred lines between individual and diagnosis, familial duty and growing resentment, and the difficult choices we must make to care for ourselves and others.
Balancing brevity and boldness, sharp insight with stunning language, Mailhot’s debut memoir about intergenerational trauma places fragmented memories of her childhood of poverty, addiction, and abuse on Seabird Island Indian Reservation in Canada, with those of tumultuous relationships and her institutionalization in mosaic precision. Mailhot is careful not let this scaffolding show, instead, thrusting readers into the world of bipolar disorder and PTSD with little narrative explanation. “My story was maltreated. The words were too wrong and ugly to speak,” Mailhot writes in her frank introduction, her narrative refusing apology or sentiment while still lush with lyricism. The very act of reading Heart Berries is immersive, both breathtaking and brutal, indicative of what it is like to live with mental illness.
Emezi’s debut novel tells the story of Ada, an Igbo and Tamil woman with multiple selves. Set within the context of Nigerian Igbo spirituality as opposed to western understandings of mental health, much of the novel is narrated by the ogbanje — trickster spirits that occupy human bodies — which exist inside Ada from a young age, increasing their presence when she experiences trauma on her college campus in the United States. Demanding sex, alcohol, disordered eating, self-harm, they wonder, “What she would have been without us, if she would have gone mad still. What if we had stayed asleep? What is she had remained locked in those years when she belonged to herself?” Freshwater’s nonlinear lyricism and raw narration challenges the knowability of mental health through science, asking us all to consider our otherness, mutability, and multiplicity.
Broder’s debut novel is the surreal, obsessive, and darkly erotic story of a deeply depressed woman who escapes her dead-end relationship and doctoral dissertation to house sit for her wealthy sister in Venice Beach, LA. Lucy spends her time alternating between awkward group therapy sessions and Tinder dates, before meeting a handsome surfer late one night who, it turns out, is a sexual masterpiece. And also a merman. Delightfully bizarre, The Pisces holds nothing back in its critique of the capitalistic wellness industry, descriptions of the detached anxiety of online dating, and merfolk carnality. Border’s discussion of mental illness is equally explicit, Lucy asks, “Could anyone be totally ignorant of the void? Didn’t all of us have an awareness of it, a brush with it — perhaps only once or twice, like at a funeral for someone very close to you, when you walked out of the funeral home and it stopped making sense for just a blip that you existed?” The Pieces presents the duality of mental illness. Lucy is sexual and powerful, seeking pleasure and agency in her body, even as she is unsure of her mind and refuses to conform to the desire for marriage, children, or even recovery.
Stern’s Little Panic tells the story of her anxious childhood in New York City, one surrounded by mystery and misunderstanding until she is diagnosed at twenty-five. Plagued by fears that her mother will abandon her or that she will be kidnapped, Stern’s worries are exacerbated by the intelligence tests she is forced to undergo as a child. “If I try to explain to adults how I’m feeling, they say I’m being overdramatic,” she explains. “Adults always say that kids have it easy, that they wish they could go back to childhood. The kids around me are carefree and happy, but I’m not, and life doesn’t feel easy for me, ever, which means I’m being a kid in the wrong way.” Stories from Stern’s childhood are interspersed with a present-day narrative of failed relationships and the desire to become a mother. Throbbing with dread, yet tender in its rendering of life with a terrifying illness, Little Panic weaves the innocent voice of a child with the world-weariness of an adult who has spent a lifetime with panic disorder.
The Collected Schizophrenias is Wang’s highly anticipated forthcoming essay collection about her experiences with schizoaffective disorder, a diagnosis complicated by PTSD and Lyme disease, and the medical community’s own debates about mental illness and treatment. Wang’s insight is sharp, her experience as both a patient and former Stanford lab research lending itself to her blend of intimate personal revelations and careful research.
With almost 20 years of bookselling experience behind me and (hopefully) a good many more to come, compiling a list of fictional booksellers appeared at first to be an effortless task, but after a little research I was astonished to find out quite how many books have been set in bookshops.
Purchase the book
I suppose there’s a kind of romance associated with the place where old books await a new life in fresh hands, and a sense that a place that contains thousands of stories bound within the books on its shelves should be a natural home to the setting of a story.
My book, The Diary of a Bookseller, recounts a year of buying and selling books in my shop in rural Scotland, but there is a world of other tales set in and around bookshops. Below are some of my favorites booksellers in fiction:
Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons
Stereotype one— the ‘know-it-all’ sneering bookseller who appears to care less about making sales than he does about making his customers feel stupid. The creators of The Simpsons creators have distilled the most obvious characteristics of the obsessive into a character who is both odious and pitiable in equal measure. Comic Book Guy’s passion for his subject it matched only by his contempt for his customers, and in many respects this reflects the reason why people who are passionate about their subject find it frustrating dealing with others who are less well informed than they are.
Although Muir attempted to pass this off as a genuine diary, it quickly becomes obvious from reading it that this is a work of fiction, and Baxter — charming, knowledgeable, frustrated, and vaguely incompetent — is Muir’s parody of the booksellers he encountered in Edinburgh at the time in which he wrote it. Booksellers in fiction appear to conform to one of several stereotypes, and Muir’s protagonist certainly conforms to the most obvious; the autodidact who believes that his hard-learned knowledge entitles him to a better life than the lot he has been cast. Despite the inevitable bitterness that accompanies such a character, Baxter is someone to whom it is impossible not to warm as the book unfolds, and his final realization that he is content with his quiet life in a small Scottish bookshop comes as no surprise at the conclusion of the book.
Dean Corso from The Ninth Gate based on The Club Dumas by Arturo Perez-Reverte, translated by Sonia Soto
Another stereotype manifests itself — this time it is of the unscrupulous book dealer Dean Corso (played by Johnny Depp). No depths of dishonesty and manipulation are too low for Corso to sink in his avarice, and the premise of the story is that Depp’s bookseller is charged with acquiring the three remaining copies of a 17th century book which — when put together — contain the requisite information to summon the devil. Corso’s character in the film throws into relief the moral dilemma faced by booksellers on a daily basis; what are you prepared to sell in order to make a living, even if it conflicts with your own beliefs. Corso, though, appears to be so devoid of a magnetic field in his moral compass that this doesn’t seem to cause him any problems.
This is less about a fictional bookseller, and more about a fictional book. And another one about the devil, but this time the protagonist is a young boy whose father (an antiquarian bookseller) takes him to a secret library in post-Civil War Barcelona to pick a book which he has to protect for the rest of his life. The story is utterly spellbinding, and the message about the power of books — although far from subtle — is something which both booksellers and readers have found hard to resist.
This is a book which — I have to confess — I haven’t read. The film, though, I have watched, and as a bookseller found a little two-dimensional. Florence (the widow around whom the story is based) moves to rural Suffolk to open a bookshop in a building which the upstanding elders of the town have earmarked for use as a centre for the arts. She finds herself embroiled in a conflict with them, employing the daughter of a poor family (who she turns into a bibliophile) and being almost rescued from financial ruin by a reclusive aristocrat but ultimately losing her fight to keep her shop open.
Darling’s bookseller is — like John Baxter — a fictional creation. The melancholy essays which make up the book were purportedly written by a man who — after suffering the trauma of the First World War — decided to open a bookshop. In the foreword, the author (under the guise of a character known only as X. Z. E) describes the bookseller as having been ‘hit on the head in the War’ as a possible explanation for why he decided to become a bookseller. The essays are at times poignant, at others unspeakably funny. Even Darling’s foreword (to the foreword — there are two) is brilliantly understated. In describing how the bankrupt bookseller committed suicide, Darling explains how, on being notified of his impending financial catastrophe, he ended his life by putting his head in a gas stove; ‘The gas was full on and not lighted. The stove was one of the new kind — more like an ordinary grate than the upright sort’, paying more attention to the detail of the stove than the tragedy with which it was associated.
Bernard Black from Black Books
No list of fictional booksellers would be complete without the inclusion of Bernard Black, Dylan Moran’s superbly drawn character from the 18 episodes of this fine comedy series. Cranky, irascible, frequently drunk and with little or no patience for his customers, Bernard is the fictional bookseller with whom I most readily identify. The observations and detail made by the writers (Moran and Graham Lenahan) are precise and accurate, and the other members of the cast — Manny and Fran provide the eccentric characters who are the perfect foil to Bernard’s incessant fury at the world and his customers in particular.
About the Author
Shaun Bythell is the owner of The Bookshop in Wigtown, Scotland — Scotland’s largest second-hand bookshop — and is the author of The Diary of a Bookseller.
There are a lot of reasons to love J.D. Salinger’s first-person novel about a disaffected youngster, even nearly 70 years later. It’s a book with cussing in it that you’re often required to read in school. It’s the way many of us learned to pronounce the name “Phoebe.” It potentially pushes teens towards a career in cold-weather ornithology. And if you’re a white, relatively affluent, permanently grouchy young man with no real problems at all, it’s extraordinarily relatable. The problem comes when you’re not. Where’s the Catcher in the Rye for the majority of readers who are too non-young, non-white, and non-male to be able to stand listening to Holden Caulfield feel sorry for himself?
Fire the Canon is Electric Lit’s limited series on making the standard high school syllabus more inclusive. In this edition, our panel of writers and educators—high school English teacher Larissa Pahomov; National Book Award finalist Carmen Maria Machado; writer Jaya Saxena, who among other things wrote a series about classic children’s literature on The Toast; and writer and professor Kiese Laymon—suggest alternatives and supplements to The Catcher in the Rye.
Folks who think The Catcher in the Rye is the height of edginess and adolescent angst are not going to be ready for Shirley Jackson’s singular bildungsroman about social ostracism, ne’er-do-well relatives, witchcraft, and murder. Just read this opening paragraph and tell me you don’t want to sit down with this novel immediately:
My name is Mary Katherine Blackwood. I am eighteen years old, and I live with my sister Constance. I have often thought that with any luck at all, I could have been born a werewolf, because the two middle fingers on both my hands are the same length, but I have had to be content with what I had. I dislike washing myself, and dogs, and noise. I like my sister Constance, and Richard Plantagenet, and Amanita phalloides, the death-cup mushroom. Everyone else in our family is dead.
Jaya Saxena suggests: Paper Girls by Brian K. Vaughan
The thing about Catcher is that it’s really great for validating teen angst and really bad at transforming that angst into anything like empathy, because the second you turn 18 Holden Caulfield becomes a whiny brat who only softbois and murderers connect with. It could easily be replaced with Paper Girls, written by Brian K. Vaughan and illustrated by Cliff Chiang. Not only do you get four flavors of teenage angst in there (inspired by poverty, sexual orientation, race, addiction and more), the entire sci-fi story is about how adults fail children, generation after generation, even when they have the ability to time travel. Their angst feels real in a way Holden’s never does, and is complex enough to resonate beyond teen years.
Larissa Pahomov suggests: The Idiot by Elif Batuman
The main character of Elif Batuman’s novel is the kind of student who, had she been assigned “Catcher in the Rye” in English class, would have had a hard time connecting with Holden Caulfield’s dramatic flame-out. Selin is many things that Holden is not: communicative with her mother, going to Harvard in the fall, plays the violin. When she experiences her first love with an ambivalent upperclassman, she doesn’t run away to New York to brood, but her experiences are just as confusing. Am I embarrassing myself in Russian class? What do all of his emails mean? What if I follow him to Europe for the summer? Selin is even-keeled, tentative, hopeful — and ultimately just as vulnerable and troubled as Holden in his hotel room.
Caucasia was the first novel I assigned as a 26-year-old professor at Vassar and students more than loved it. They worked with it. The canary in the coal mine metaphor gets a bit clunky at the end, but the pacing and politics of the book are still astounding. While Holden makes his way through New York and a particular kind of white boyish existentialism, Birdie and Cole make their way through Boston, the American family, femininity, hybridity, antiblackness, sexual violence and the rugged unrelenting conundrum of how to love the folks who made you when the folks who made you are tired of loving themselves.
Electric Literature staff suggests: Lucy by Jamaica Kincaid
Like Holden Caulfield, Kincaid’s eponymous Lucy is a teenager who is reckoning for the first time with the fundamental artificiality of white middle-class American life. Unlike Holden, Lucy is an outside observer: an au pair from the West Indies observing the hollowness at the heart of her employer family. When she thinks something’s phony, it stings.
For the 30th birthday of the Roald Dahl novel Matilda, original illustrator Quentin Blake imagined some possible futures for its precocious heroine: astrophysicist, world traveler, librarian. That got us wondering where the rest of our childhood favorites ended up. Now, more than ever, we need to know that Ramona Quimby and the kid from The Snowy Day turned out okay.
To live in the modern world is to learn that if you check the news before you get out of bed in the morning, you may fail to understand what the point is in leaving your bed after all. The adults left in the room are the courageous ones, who are are being mocked, trivialized, and abandoned by the cowardly, powerful few. It’s times like these when we need to remember that the future is not our own, but that of our children. So we thought it might be time to remember the children who inspired us to grow up and seek change. (Note: we’ve taken the liberty of imaging these characters into our own time, even if they come from centuries ago.) Here are seven characters we’d like to imagine growing up to do a better job than we’re doing right now.
After abandoning a Ph.D. in anthropology, Karana met her partner and the two women returned to the island where Karana was born. Karana and her wife run a “survival camp” for women who have experienced trauma — particularly domestic trauma and migrational trauma — by empowering them to see the power in their capacity to survive without the patriarchal systems who abuse them. Her partner, an acclaimed psychologist, offers counseling and support for these same women. The camp is booked through the next three years.
Fern now runs an international non-profit organization for women farmers. At a young age, she learned how quickly men in power are willing to sacrifice the life of the terrific young, and how often women are assigned the duty of taking care of the defenseless. After observing Charlotte’s remarkable marketing skills, Fern was inspired to change the world. Her organization is committed to fostering community for women farmers, providing micro-loans to challenge the international wealth-gap, and provide social platforms for women farmers to connect with each other to challenge the sexist stories and celebrate the women who aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty. She is a vegetarian and still hates her dad.
Ramona Quimby from the Ramona series by Beverly Cleary
Ramona Quimby is a media personality who isn’t afraid to live her best life. After dealing with the guilt and frustration of being a “messy girl” she now has her own late-night show wherein she celebrates literal and figurative messes. Her rise to stardom started after an essay she wrote “In Defense of the Stain On My Shirt” about the sexist demands for women to remain “clean” and “pure,” went viral. She’s inspired girls everywhere to throw out their stain sticks and embrace getting into trouble.
Stanley and Zero have never really left each other’s side ever since the curse was lifted. Though the two lived seemingly happily-ever after, they continued to reflect on the prison-industrial complex — the structural inequalities and inherent racism represented in the breakdown of the US adult population in prison (where black adults represented 12% of the U.S. adult population but 33% of the sentenced prison population, and Hispanic adults represented 16% of the adult population and 23% of inmates, according to PEW) — and decided to do something about it. After studying hard in law school (and without using said hard work as an alibi for sexual assault accusations), the two are now defense attorneys, eager to reform the system from the inside. Zero’s book, The Hole Becomes a Grave: The Pitfalls of the Prison Industrial Complex by Hector Zeroni, J.D., will be out next fall.
Harriet runs a cybersecurity firm for journalists. She opens client pitches by recounting her experience at a young age with a special marble composition book that got into the wrong hands. It was the beginning of her education in journalistic integrity. She believes that confidentiality is crucial for those interested in documenting the realities of the world and uncovering dangerous truths that the powerful few would prefer remain hidden.
Peter is a painter and professor living in Brooklyn. As the earth continues to warm, that first snowfall has haunted him. While Peter completed an MFA in poetry at the New School and remains a tenured professor specializing in Haiku, his career as a painter started only recently, after a day in February when the temperature hit 85 degrees. Words failed him, but the feeling of that fleeting snowflake on his nose, the blanket of snow on his street, grew brighter in his mind’s eye. He applied his mind to the canvas. Peter’s painting now focuses on examining the effects of climate change in parts of the world that go “unseen.” He is interested in creating visual representations of the long-term devastations of climate change.
After finally obtaining their family’s fortune, the Baudelaire children decided to invest in a school for children misplaced and traumatized by the government. Violet, with her own independently successful career as an astrophysicist, spends some of her time partnering with education specialists to create programming for young girls in STEM. Klaus, now happily married to his partner Jerome, runs a program for the boys in the school, offering early sex education with special instruction on dealing with toxic masculinity. He runs the after-school book club and personally hand-picked every book in the library. Sunny learned at an early age what it meant to be understood, and now runs the language program and the self-defense program. All three Baudelaires are active in the adoption community and spend their weekends with children in the foster-care system. They are developing a campaign for reforming youth services.
DON’T MISS OUT
Sign up for our newsletter to get submission announcements and stay on top of our best work.
YOUR INBOX IS LIT
Enjoy strange, diverting work from The Commuter on Mondays, absorbing fiction from Recommended Reading on Wednesdays, and a roundup of our best work of the week on Fridays. Personalize your subscription preferences here.